A Heggstad petition can resolve situations where assets intended to be held in a revocable living trust were never properly retitled into the trust or were unintentionally omitted. In Lemoore and throughout Kings County, this legal procedure asks a probate court to declare that certain property belongs to the trust despite lacking formal transfer paperwork. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, the approach is to carefully gather documentation, explain options in plain language, and pursue the petition in a way that protects the settlor’s intent while addressing the rights of heirs and interested parties. This paragraph explains the basic purpose and benefit of pursuing a Heggstad petition.
Many families encounter Heggstad situations when a deed, vehicle title, or financial account was meant to be placed in a trust but remained titled in the individual’s name. A successful petition clarifies ownership and allows trust administration to proceed according to the settlor’s estate plan. The process reduces the risk of additional probate proceedings, helps preserve privacy compared to full probate, and supports efficient distribution to beneficiaries. This section outlines why addressing these title gaps promptly is important and how a court determination can restore the trust’s intended control over assets for successor trustees and beneficiaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent delays and disputes during trust administration by confirming that assets belong to the trust despite the absence of formal retitling. It helps successors carry out the decedent’s or settlor’s wishes, preserves the privacy benefits of trusts, and can limit the need for larger probate proceedings that are public and may take longer. The petition also provides legal certainty to financial institutions, counties, and other entities that need a court order to recognize trust ownership. Addressing these title problems early reduces stress for family members and supports efficient asset distribution consistent with the estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including residents of Lemoore and Kings County, providing practical estate planning and trust administration services. Our team focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and court filings when necessary to protect trust-based distributions. We work with families to gather deeds, beneficiary designations, and other records that support a Heggstad petition. Throughout the process, we prioritize responsiveness and thorough preparation, explaining options and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions that align with their goals for preserving family assets and honoring the trustmaker’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a procedure used in California when property that was intended to be part of a revocable living trust was not properly retitled or conveyed before the trustmaker’s death or incapacity. The petition asks the probate court to determine that the property should be treated as trust property despite the lack of formal transfer documentation. This remedy often applies to real estate, vehicles, bank accounts, and other titled assets where the settlor’s intent is supported by affidavits, deeds, trust documents, and witness statements. The court decision lets trustees manage and distribute the asset under the trust terms.
Securing a court’s determination through a Heggstad petition typically requires assembling evidence showing that the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust. Evidence may include the trust instrument, draft deeds, records of communications, and actions taken by the settlor consistent with trust ownership. The process also involves providing notice to heirs and interested parties and allowing them to respond. While not every omitted asset needs a petition, pursuing this path brings legal clarity and can prevent future challenges to the trust’s administration, supporting a smoother transition for beneficiaries and trustees.
A Heggstad petition requests a probate court to declare that certain property belongs to a trust despite being titled in the name of the deceased or incapacitated settlor. The petition rests on evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust and may include deeds, trust documents, and affidavits. Originating from case law, the procedure provides a clear legal mechanism for addressing unintended title gaps without reworking the trust. The court’s order allows the trustee to administer or distribute the asset under the terms of the trust, which often prevents the need for full probate proceedings and reduces public exposure of estate matters.
The Heggstad petition process typically begins with a detailed review of the trust document and related records to identify the omitted asset and evidence of the settlor’s intent. Required steps include gathering documentary support, preparing the petition and declarations, serving notice on heirs and interested parties, and filing with the appropriate probate court. A hearing may be scheduled where the court evaluates the proofs and any objections. If the court finds in favor of the petition, it issues an order that clarifies ownership for purposes of trust administration, enabling the trustee to proceed with distribution or management consistent with the trust terms.
Understanding key terms helps clarify the petition process and the roles of individuals involved. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, title, deed, petition, and notice. Knowing how these pieces fit together is useful when assembling documentation and planning next steps. This section provides practical definitions and examples that show how each term applies in real scenarios where property was intended for a trust but was not properly transferred before the trustmaker’s death or incapacity.
The settlor, sometimes called the trustmaker, is the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it. The settlor sets the terms for how assets are to be managed and distributed by a trustee. In Heggstad cases, the settlor’s expressed intent—through the trust document, deeds, or other records—is central to establishing that a particular asset belongs to the trust even if it was never formally retitled. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent is a primary component of a successful petition and provides the foundation for the court to recognize trust ownership.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets according to the trust’s terms for the benefit of named beneficiaries. Following a Heggstad petition, the trustee may be authorized to take control of an asset that had not been titled into the trust, allowing administration and distribution under the trust’s directions. The trustee has fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of beneficiaries, and court confirmation through a petition helps provide the trustee with the legal authority needed to carry out those duties without uncertainty or delay.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, or other designated recipients. When a Heggstad petition is filed, beneficiaries may receive notice and have the opportunity to respond or raise objections. The petition’s outcome can directly affect the timeline and manner in which beneficiaries receive trust assets, so transparent communication and careful documentation help protect beneficiary interests and ensure distributions align with the trustmaker’s intentions.
Title and deed refer to the legal documents that show ownership of real property. If a deed was never reexecuted in the name of the trust or recorded to reflect trust ownership, the property may remain titled to the individual. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that, notwithstanding the recorded title, the settlor intended the property to be trust property. Supporting documents and testimony are used to establish that intent, allowing the trustee to treat the property as part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
When assets intended for a trust are found outside the trust, families often consider several paths: informal transfer through beneficiaries, title correction, filing a Heggstad petition, or initiating probate. Each option has trade-offs in cost, timing, notice requirements, and public disclosure. Heggstad petitions provide a formal court finding without full probate and often preserve the privacy and structure of the trust. Title transfers outside court may be possible in limited situations, but courts provide lasting clarity and reduce the risk of later disputes. Choosing the right route depends on asset type, family dynamics, and the strength of supporting documentation.
A limited, non-litigation approach may suffice when clear, uncontested documentation shows the settlor intended trust ownership and all interested parties agree to a direct title transfer. For example, when beneficiaries and heirs are aligned and a straightforward deed can be executed and recorded to place property into the trust, the parties may avoid court proceedings. That said, institutions such as county recorders or financial firms sometimes require a court order to accept retitling, so it is important to confirm procedural acceptance before relying on a title correction alone.
If there are no anticipated disputes, no unknown heirs, and all parties with an interest consent to the transfer, a brief administrative retitling or agreement may achieve the desired result without court involvement. This path can be quicker and less expensive, but it depends on cooperation among stakeholders and the willingness of institutions to reissue titles. When there is any uncertainty about parties or future challenges, seeking a Heggstad petition provides more durable legal protection for the trustee and beneficiaries.
When family members or other parties dispute ownership, or when competing claims appear likely, a Heggstad petition provides a formal setting to present evidence and resolve disagreements under the authority of the probate court. The court’s determination clarifies title and reduces the chance of future litigation. In contentious situations, having a clear record and a court order helps trustees proceed with confidence and diminishes the risk of subsequent challenges that could delay administration and increase costs for the estate and beneficiaries.
Financial institutions, title companies, and county recorders sometimes insist upon a court order before recognizing trust ownership of a particular asset. When those entities will not accept a direct administrative transfer, a Heggstad petition provides the necessary judicial confirmation. Pursuing the petition avoids back-and-forth with institutions that could otherwise stall trust administration. The court’s order gives clear authority to the trustee and compels third parties to recognize the trust’s rights in the asset at issue.
A comprehensive approach that includes a Heggstad petition offers lasting legal clarity, reduces the likelihood of later disputes, and supports timely administration of trust assets. It may prevent multiple rounds of litigation and reduce uncertainty for successors and beneficiaries. While filing a petition involves court filings and notices, the resulting order often enables trustees to manage and distribute assets confidently, helping preserve estate value and honoring the settlor’s intent. The approach balances procedural steps with long-term benefits for family harmony and efficient administration.
In addition to legal certainty, a court determination can improve interactions with third parties such as escrow companies, banks, and county recorders by providing an authoritative document they will accept. That acceptance can speed transfers and reduce administrative friction. For families that value privacy, resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition can limit the scope of public probate proceedings while still providing a judicial remedy. Overall, the comprehensive route focuses on durable solutions that align property records with the trustmaker’s written and documented intentions.
A Heggstad petition produces a court order that clarifies ownership and provides the trustee with legal authority to act on behalf of the trust. This level of certainty eases transactions involving the asset, such as sale, refinancing, or distribution, because third parties can rely on the court’s finding. By resolving uncertainties through the judicial process, trustees reduce the chance of future disputes and protect beneficiaries from delays. The court’s determination integrates the asset into the trust’s administration in a way that is recognized by institutions and recording offices.
Using a Heggstad petition can help avoid full probate administration, which is typically broader and more public. While the petition requires filings and notice, it is narrower in scope and often limits disclosure relative to a full probate estate. Preserving privacy around estate matters is important to many families who prefer to resolve title issues within the framework of trust administration. The result supports timely handling of assets while keeping sensitive financial details more contained than would be the case in a full probate proceeding.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any deed copies, titles, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and notes that reflect the settlor’s intent. Early documentation helps establish a coherent timeline and supports the factual assertions needed for a petition. Photocopies, recorded deeds, and bank statements that show payments or actions related to the asset can be helpful. Thorough preparation reduces delays and provides a clearer presentation to the court and interested parties, which can improve the likelihood of a favorable determination and speed the trustee’s ability to manage the asset.
Confirm the specific requirements of county recorders, title companies, and financial institutions regarding recognition of trust ownership, as some may require a court order. Knowing these institutional rules helps you choose between a direct administrative transfer and pursuing a petition. Plan for the time necessary to file documents, serve notices, and wait for a hearing date, and weigh the benefits of a formal court finding against the timeline and costs. Proper planning prevents unnecessary delays in administering or distributing the asset within the trust.
Families should consider a Heggstad petition whenever an asset intended for a trust remains titled in the settlor’s name and that asset is needed for trust administration or distribution. The petition is also appropriate when institutions refuse administrative retitling or when heirs and beneficiaries require judicial clarity to avoid future disputes. If the asset is significant—such as real estate—or if public probate proceedings are undesirable, the petition provides a narrower court remedy that aligns title with the trustmaker’s documented intent while maintaining more privacy than full probate.
Even when assets seem minor, unresolved title issues can create administrative roadblocks, delay distributions, or trigger creditor or tax complications. A court-ordered determination through a Heggstad petition resolves uncertainties and supports the trustee’s authority to act. If family relationships are strained or if unknown heirs may later surface, securing a judicial finding reduces the opportunity for future challenges. Considering a petition early in the trust administration process can preserve estate value, reduce friction, and provide a stable path for carrying out the settlor’s wishes.
Typical circumstances include real estate where the deed was never reexecuted in the name of the trust, bank or brokerage accounts still in the individual’s name, vehicles not retitled, or transactions where the settlor took actions indicating an intent to fund the trust but formal steps were incomplete. Other scenarios include failed attempts to transfer assets before incapacity or death, or where third-party institutions insist on a court order before recognizing trust ownership. Each circumstance requires tailored documentation and an appropriate legal approach to secure trust administration.
Real estate is one of the most common assets involved in Heggstad petitions because deeds are often not reexecuted or recorded in time. When a property remains titled in the settlor’s name, the trustee may be unable to sell, refinance, or transfer the property without a court ruling. A Heggstad petition asks the court to acknowledge the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, enabling the trustee to treat the property as trust-owned and proceed with necessary transactions while honoring the trust’s distribution directives and protecting the interests of beneficiaries.
Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and vehicle titles can be overlooked during trust funding, especially if the settlor performed many transfers or relied on a pour-over will. When such assets remain outside the trust, administrative and practical problems can arise for successor trustees. A petition provides the legal recognition needed to integrate those assets into the trust’s administration. Documentation like account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence indicating intent to include the asset will bolster the case for court confirmation.
Sometimes title companies, banks, or county recorders will not accept an administrative transfer or correction without a court order. In those cases, a Heggstad petition becomes the method to secure the documentation these institutions require. The court’s order provides an authoritative record that third parties will accept. Pursuing the petition in such circumstances prevents prolonged negotiations or stalled transactions and ensures that the trustee can complete necessary actions to manage and distribute trust assets according to the settlor’s plan.
Serving Lemoore and Kings County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers practical assistance for resolving trust title issues and filing Heggstad petitions when necessary. We focus on clear, client-centered communication and a methodical approach to gathering evidence and preparing court filings. Our goal is to help families achieve legal clarity so trustees can manage and distribute assets in a timely manner while minimizing needless delay. If you are facing title uncertainty for property intended to be in a trust, reach out for an initial review and explanation of available options tailored to your situation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings a focus on responsive client service and practical legal solutions to Heggstad matters in California. We prioritize understanding each client’s goals and assembling a factual record that communicates the settlor’s intent clearly to the court. Our approach emphasizes clear explanations of likely outcomes, required documentation, and timelines, so clients can make informed decisions. We aim to resolve title issues efficiently while protecting the trust’s terms and promoting a smooth administration process for trustees and beneficiaries.
We recognize the importance of preserving family relationships and limiting stress during trust administration. That understanding guides how we handle communications with heirs, beneficiaries, and third-party institutions. We prepare petitions and supporting declarations carefully to present a coherent, persuasive case to the probate court, and we coordinate required notices to interested parties. Our practice balances the procedural steps of litigation with practical attention to timing, cost, and the goal of achieving a workable resolution that aligns with the settlor’s documented intentions.
Clients appreciate a hands-on, detail-oriented process that anticipates common institutional requirements and stands ready to respond to objections professionally. While pursuing a Heggstad petition may require court involvement, the end result is a court order that gives trustees the authority to administer assets according to the trust. Our firm assists throughout filing, service, and hearings so trustees can proceed without uncertainty. We also help with follow-up steps such as recording orders or coordinating with title companies to ensure the asset is managed properly post-decree.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust document and the asset’s records to determine whether a petition is appropriate. We gather deeds, titles, account statements, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent, then prepare the petition and supporting declarations tailored to the county’s probate court procedures. We handle service of notice to heirs and interested parties, file the petition with the court, and represent the trustee at hearings if one is scheduled. Throughout, we keep clients informed of deadlines, likely timelines, and next steps to secure trust administration.
The first step is a thorough intake to identify the asset, locate the trust document, and collect supporting proof of the settlor’s intent. This includes reviewing deeds, titles, bank statements, correspondence, and any prior attempts to retitle assets. The goal is to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and to identify any potential objections or unknown heirs who must be notified. Clear documentation at this stage strengthens the petition and helps streamline subsequent filings with the probate court.
We examine the trust instrument and any amendments to confirm the settlor’s directives and to identify named trustees and beneficiaries. This review clarifies whether the trust’s terms and timing support a claim that the asset was intended to be trust property. We also check for matching signatures, notarizations, and related conveyance documents that show an intent to fund the trust. A focused review ensures the petition will accurately reflect the settlor’s plan and prepare the strongest possible factual presentation to the court.
Gathering title evidence includes obtaining copies of deeds, vehicle titles, account records, and correspondence that reflect the settlor’s actions and intentions. We may seek declarations from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s statements or actions showing intent to include the asset in the trust. These supporting materials create a cohesive narrative for the court demonstrating the settlor’s intent and provide the foundation for the petition. Properly prepared statements and documentation improve the likelihood of a clear court determination.
After assembling the necessary evidence, we draft the petition and accompanying declarations that present the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property. The filing package includes a proposed order and proof of service forms required by the probate court. We ensure compliance with local rules for Kings County and file the papers with the appropriate court. Accurate, well-organized filings minimize technical objections and position the case for substantive review by the judge.
We prepare declarations from the trustee and other witnesses explaining the settlor’s intent and attach documentary exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and trust excerpts. These declarations provide a narrative that ties the documentary evidence to the legal standard the court will apply. Organizing exhibits clearly and referencing them in the declarations helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently and supports a favorable determination when the facts demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust.
Proper service of notice on heirs and interested parties is required in most Heggstad petitions, and we manage the notice process to ensure compliance with procedural rules. After serving notice, we file proofs of service and any required declarations with the court. Timely and correct service avoids unnecessary delays or procedural challenges and gives interested parties an opportunity to respond before the court acts. We track deadlines and manage filings so the case proceeds without avoidable setbacks.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the case for judicial determination and address any objections that may arise. The court evaluates the evidence and declarations to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. If the order is granted, we assist with implementing the court’s directive, which may include recording the order with the county recorder or providing it to financial institutions to effect the transfer. The final order gives the trustee the authority needed to administer the asset according to the trust.
At any scheduled hearing, we explain the factual record and legal basis for the petition and answer the court’s questions. We address objections, present witness declarations, and cite relevant authorities to support the requested relief. The hearing provides an opportunity to clarify ambiguous facts and demonstrate why the settlor’s intent merits judicial recognition. A clear presentation at the hearing helps the court reach a reasoned decision that aligns property title with the trustmaker’s documented plan.
Once the court signs an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we help implement the order’s terms. This may include recording the order with the county recorder for real property or presenting the order to financial institutions to change account titles. The order serves as the authoritative record that third parties will accept, enabling the trustee to sell, transfer, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust. We assist with follow-through to ensure the asset is properly integrated into the trust administration.
A Heggstad petition is a court process used to confirm that property belongs to a revocable trust even though it remains titled in the name of the settlor. It is typically filed when the trustmaker dies or becomes incapacitated and assets intended for the trust were not formally retitled. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, asking the probate court to recognize the trust’s ownership so that trustees can administer or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. This procedure is used when administrative retitling is not possible or when third parties require judicial confirmation to accept trust ownership. The petition provides a focused judicial remedy that is narrower than full probate and often helps trustees avoid the delays and public disclosures associated with probate, while giving third parties the assurance they need to transfer or manage the asset under the trust.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies by county and the complexity of the case, but commonly it can take several weeks to a few months from filing to resolution. Factors that affect timing include the court’s calendar, the need for service to interested parties, whether objections are filed, and the amount of evidence required. Some petitions proceed more quickly when documentation is clear and no contested issues arise, while contested matters will extend the timeline. Advance preparation helps shorten the process: gathering deeds, titles, account records, and witness declarations early can reduce delays. In Kings County and nearby jurisdictions, anticipating local filing and service requirements helps keep the petition moving and gives trustees and beneficiaries a clearer expectation of when they will be able to manage or distribute the contested asset.
Supporting a Heggstad petition typically requires the trust document, copies of deeds or account statements showing the asset in the settlor’s name, and any drafts or records that indicate an intent to fund the trust. Declarations from the trustee and witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard statements about the intent to include the asset are often important. The goal is to assemble a coherent set of documents and testimony that tie the asset to the trustmaker’s expressed wishes. Other helpful materials include correspondence, closing statements, payment records, and any notes or drafts that show the settlor planned to transfer the asset into the trust. Presenting organized exhibits and clear explanations in declarations helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently, reducing the likelihood of disputes and improving the chance of a straightforward ruling in favor of recognizing the trust’s interest.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically trigger a full probate administration. The petition is a targeted petition to determine that a particular asset belongs to the trust despite being titled in the settlor’s name. Because it focuses on a narrow issue, the process is typically more limited in scope than opening a full probate estate, and it often results in an order that allows trust administration to proceed without broader probate oversight. However, if significant disputes or competing claims emerge, related probate matters could become necessary. The petition aims to avoid expanding the case into full probate by providing a judicial resolution limited to the specific asset. Maintaining clear documentation and communicating with potential claimants can help keep the matter narrowly focused on title clarification rather than comprehensive estate administration.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the facts, the amount of attorney work required, court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions that require minimal litigation will cost less than cases with multiple interested parties or disputes that necessitate hearings. In addition to court fees, costs can include fees for serving notice, obtaining certified records, and recording the final order if required to clear title. Estimating total costs early in the process helps trustees plan. A careful document review and focused preparation can reduce unnecessary expense by anticipating objections and addressing likely evidentiary questions upfront. The firm will discuss estimated fees and likely court costs during an initial consultation to provide a realistic expectation of the financial commitment involved in pursuing the petition.
Yes, heirs and interested parties may object to a Heggstad petition, and the court will consider any timely objections before issuing an order. Objections often focus on whether the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust, or whether other legal issues such as undue influence or lack of capacity affect the settlor’s decisions. The court will evaluate the evidence presented by both sides and decide whether the petition’s showing meets the legal standard for recognizing trust ownership. To minimize the risk of successful objections, it is important to assemble strong documentary evidence and credible declarations supporting the settlor’s intent. Proper notice and careful preparation of exhibits and statements reduce surprises at hearing and help the court resolve disputes efficiently. When objections are raised, the petitioning party must respond with clear factual support to demonstrate that the asset belongs to the trust.
Real estate is a frequent subject of Heggstad petitions because deeds are not always reexecuted or recorded, leaving property titled in the settlor’s name. Vehicles, bank and brokerage accounts, and retirement plan trust matters that were overlooked during funding may also require a petition. Any titled asset that third parties will not allow to be administered by the trustee without a court order can be the focus of a petition to clarify ownership for trust purposes. Additionally, assets associated with pour-over wills or transactions that were intended but not completed before the settlor’s death commonly lead to petitions. The petition process adapts to varied asset types, but the common theme is showing clear evidence that the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned despite the absence of formal retitling.
A Heggstad petition is not the same as a trust amendment or restatement. A trust amendment or restatement is a document the settlor signs to change the trust’s terms while alive and competent. A petition, by contrast, is a court filing after the settlor’s death or incapacity asking a judge to recognize that an asset belongs to the trust despite lacking formal transfer. The petition addresses title and evidentiary questions, whereas amendments change the trust’s substantive provisions while the settlor is alive. Where a settlor intended to amend the trust but did not complete the amendment before death, the remedy is fact-specific. A Heggstad petition focuses on aligning property ownership with the trustmaker’s demonstrated intent. When the parties need formal recognition of ownership rather than a change in trust language, the petition is the appropriate judicial mechanism.
Banks, title companies, and county recorders generally accept a court order that clearly declares trust ownership, but procedures and timelines vary by institution. Some entities will not reissue titles or release funds without an order, while others may accept a recorded deed or a certification of trust. The Heggstad court order typically carries the weight institutions need to process the transfer, but it is wise to confirm individual institutional requirements early so filings and supporting documents meet their standards. When institutions have specific requirements, we include steps to comply with those conditions in the petition process. That preparation can include drafting an order in a form acceptable to the title company or presenting recordable findings for the county recorder. Anticipating these needs reduces back-and-forth and helps trustees complete post-order transactions promptly.
After obtaining a Heggstad order, trustees should expect to implement the court’s directives by providing the order to relevant institutions and, when necessary, recording it with the county recorder. The order authorizes the trustee to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Trustees should also ensure that any subsequent transactions, such as sales or title transfers, follow the trust’s provisions and that beneficiaries receive distributions as directed. Trustees may face follow-up administrative steps such as updating account records, coordinating with escrow or title companies, or filing documents with financial institutions. The firm assists with these post-order tasks to ensure the asset is integrated into trust administration smoothly and that the trustee’s actions are properly documented and compliant with legal and institutional requirements.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas