A Heggstad petition is a legal tool used in California to address assets that were intended to be in a trust but were never properly transferred. If a trustmaker’s property was left outside the trust after their death, a Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that those assets should be treated as trust property and distributed according to the trust’s terms. For Stratford and nearby Kings County families, pursuing this petition helps avoid costly probate court administration. Understanding when and how to file can protect beneficiary expectations and preserve the settlor’s documented wishes for asset distribution.
Many families discover after a death that some recently acquired property or accounts were never retitled into a living trust, even though the trust was intended to control distribution. A Heggstad petition can correct that oversight by asking a court to recognize that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. The process focuses on proving intent, documentary evidence, and the trustmaker’s consistent estate plan. Timely action can simplify administration, reduce conflict among heirs, and align final distribution with the trust creator’s plan without undergoing a full probate proceeding in Kings County.
A successful Heggstad petition can confirm that assets belong to a trust and should be distributed outside of probate, which can save time and expense for beneficiaries. It helps enforce the trustmaker’s intentions, minimize public court supervision, and often reduces the potential for disputes among heirs. For families in Stratford and the surrounding California communities, filing a petition can also protect privacy because trust administration is generally private while probate records are public. Securing a judicial declaration that omitted assets are trust property preserves continuity in estate administration and respects the settlor’s final arrangements.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is based in San Jose and assists families throughout California with estate planning and post-death administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. The firm focuses on clear communication, careful documentation, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. Whether a file involves simple omitted assets or more complex trust funding issues, the office works to assemble the necessary evidence, prepare persuasive filings, and guide clients through court proceedings in Kings County. The priority is securing results that honor the trustmaker’s written plan while minimizing stress and delay for relatives.
A Heggstad petition is rooted in California case law and court procedure that allows a personal representative, trustee, or beneficiary to ask a probate court to find that certain property was intended to be part of a trust. The petition typically presents written instruments, such as the trust document, deeds, account statements, and correspondence, to show intent to fund the trust. The petitioner must describe the property, explain why the asset was omitted, and show that the trust governs distribution. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine if the asset should be treated as trust property.
Evidence in a Heggstad petition can include contemporaneous documents, draft trust versions, beneficiary communications, and actions by the trustmaker that demonstrate intent. Courts look for clear indicia that the trustmaker meant the asset to be governed by the trust, such as consistent estate planning documents or steps taken to place similar assets into the trust. A petition may involve negotiation with interested parties and sometimes contested hearings, so a careful factual presentation and clarity about the legal basis for relief are important. Outcomes can range from agreement among heirs to judicial rulings resolving ownership.
A Heggstad petition requests that the court issue an order declaring that specific assets are trust property even though they were never formally transferred. The petition explains the omission and provides evidence of the decedent’s intent to place the asset into the trust. The typical goal is to avoid probate for those items and to enable the trustee to distribute them according to the trust terms. The process emphasizes intent and written record. When successful, the ruling streamlines administration, permits trustee action, and enforces the trustmaker’s plan without additional probate administration for the omitted assets.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves identifying omitted assets, gathering supporting documents, preparing a petition that describes the property and the basis for relief, and serving interested parties. Documentation may include deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, drafts of the trust or related estate planning documents, and witness statements that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. The process can include informal resolutions or court hearings if parties object. The judge will review the record, weigh competing evidence, and issue an order that either recognizes the asset as trust property or denies the petition, depending on the strength of the proof.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions makes it easier to follow the legal process. Terms such as trustmaker, trustee, settlor, probate, funding, and petition have specific meanings and roles in a post-death trust-related court filing. Knowing what documents are persuasive, how courts view intent, and what relief a Heggstad petition can obtain helps families make informed decisions. This glossary highlights common phrases you will encounter during case preparation and court proceedings so you can recognize important concepts when assembling materials or discussing the case with counsel.
Trustmaker, often called the settlor, is the person who created the trust and set its terms. The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing and distributing trust assets according to those terms. In the Heggstad context, the trustmaker’s intent is central; the trustee may file a petition or act to have omitted assets declared as trust property so distribution follows the trust. Identifying these roles clarifies who has standing to file, who must be served, and who will carry out any court-ordered transfers to align property ownership with the trust document.
Deeds and title documents show ownership of real property and are critical when the omitted asset includes a house, land, or other real estate. A Heggstad petition may ask the court to recognize a property as part of the trust despite the deed remaining in the decedent’s name. For bank or investment accounts, account registration and beneficiary designations affect ownership status. Demonstrating consistent intent to transfer title or control to the trust can persuade the court that the asset should be administered by the trustee rather than through probate.
Probate is the court-supervised process for settling a decedent’s estate when assets pass under a will or have no designated mechanism to avoid probate. Trust administration is a private process where a trustee distributes assets according to the trust without court oversight in many cases. A Heggstad petition can shift specific assets out of probate and into trust administration by obtaining a court declaration. Eliminating probate for those assets often saves time and expense and keeps distribution details private, which is a primary reason families pursue this remedy.
Evidence of intent includes draft estate planning documents, correspondence showing plans to fund a trust, declarations or affidavits from witnesses, and transaction records suggesting the transfer was intended but not completed. Courts evaluate all relevant evidence to determine whether the trustmaker intended the item to be trust property. Clear, consistent documentary proof often carries the most weight, but circumstantial evidence can also play a role. Assembling a coherent record increases the likelihood that a petition will be successful and helps the court understand the trustmaker’s intentions.
When assets are omitted from a trust, families generally consider several legal options: negotiating an agreement among beneficiaries, filing a Heggstad petition, or administering the property through probate. Negotiation can sometimes resolve matters quickly if all beneficiaries agree, while probate can be time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition aims to achieve the trustmaker’s intended outcome without full probate by obtaining a court declaration that the asset belongs to the trust. Choosing the right option depends on the strength of the evidence, the level of family agreement, and the desire to preserve privacy and reduce costs.
A limited approach often works when all beneficiaries and interested parties agree that a particular asset should be treated as part of the trust. In such cases, the trustee can gather documentation and distribute the asset without court intervention, provided there is sufficient evidence of the decedent’s intent and no third-party objections. This path avoids the time and expense of a contested court filing and preserves privacy because distributions can be handled within trust administration. Parties should document the agreement carefully to minimize future disputes and to provide a clear paper trail.
For assets of relatively low value or those that can be quickly and simply re-titled, informal resolution may be practical. If the trustee and beneficiaries consent and the asset can be transferred with straightforward paperwork, handling it without court involvement can save time and legal costs. Even when values are modest, careful documentation is advisable to confirm the transfer and the parties’ understanding. However, when questions about the decedent’s intent or competing claims arise, a Heggstad petition or formal process may be necessary to provide legal certainty and avoid future litigation.
If family members or other interested parties dispute whether an asset belongs to the trust, pursuing a Heggstad petition can provide a definitive judicial ruling. Disputes can arise over interpretation of documents, ambiguous beneficiary designations, or competing accounts of what the decedent intended. A court’s determination helps prevent ongoing conflict and creates a clear legal basis for the trustee to act. Preparing a persuasive petition and managing contested proceedings requires careful attention to evidence, legal argument, and procedural requirements to achieve a stable resolution for all parties.
When the omitted asset is real estate, a substantial investment account, or an asset with complex title or ownership issues, court assistance may be necessary to clarify ownership and facilitate transfer. Real property often requires clear judicial direction to update deeds and titles, and high-value accounts can attract competing claims that complicate distribution. A formal Heggstad petition can secure the legal authority needed to retitle property to the trustee or instruct financial institutions to recognize trust ownership, which protects beneficiaries and reduces the risk of future challenges.
A comprehensive approach to resolving omitted trust assets prioritizes clear evidence gathering, precise legal filings, and thoughtful communication with interested parties. This method reduces the chance of future litigation and increases the likelihood that the court will recognize the trustmaker’s intended distribution. It also helps trustees avoid personal liability by securing judicial authority for transfers. For families in Stratford, investing in a comprehensive process can preserve relationships, minimize delays, and ensure the trust’s terms are enforced as written, rather than leaving distribution to uncertain or contested probate procedures.
Beyond legal certainty, a complete approach protects privacy and reduces administrative burden. A court declaration that omitted property is trust property typically permits the trustee to act without opening a broader probate estate, keeping sensitive financial information out of public records. Comprehensive preparation and presentation of a petition can shorten court proceedings and help reach agreements with other heirs. In situations where assets are distributed according to the trust, families often experience fewer surprises and less tension compared with full probate administration, which can be lengthy and more costly.
Securing a judicial declaration that omitted assets belong to a trust lessens the risk that someone later challenges the distribution. A clear court order establishes the legal status of the property and provides the trustee with authority to act without fear of personal liability for distribution decisions. This protection is especially meaningful when asset values are significant or when family relationships are strained. By resolving ownership issues upfront and with formal legal backing, beneficiaries gain certainty and can proceed with the trustee’s administration according to the trust’s directives.
A comprehensive legal strategy speeds up the process by organizing evidence and presenting a persuasive case to the court, which can reduce delays caused by contested claims or unclear documentation. When the court issues an order recognizing omitted assets as trust property, the trustee can proceed with distribution without opening a full probate estate for those items. This efficiency saves time and expense for beneficiaries and avoids the extended timelines that often accompany probate. Clear planning and thoughtful case preparation make administration smoother and more predictable.
Start by collecting every document that could show the trustmaker’s intent, including trust drafts, final trust documents, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, emails, letters, and any notes referring to transfers. Witness statements from family members or advisors who recall the decedent’s plans can be helpful. Organizing these materials chronologically and making copies for interested parties and the court streamlines the petition process. Clear documentation reduces ambiguity and strengthens the petition, making it easier to demonstrate that an asset was meant to be treated as trust property.
Provide up-to-date valuations and descriptions of omitted assets when preparing a petition, including appraisals for real estate or items of significant value and account statements for financial holdings. Accurate valuation reduces disputes over distribution and clarifies the estate’s financial picture. If property requires maintenance, secure records of expenses or improvements that may affect distribution. Detailed information helps the court understand the asset’s importance to the estate and supports a well-reasoned petition that aligns ownership with the trustmaker’s intentions.
Families consider a Heggstad petition when assets were unintentionally left out of a trust, when probate would be inconvenient or costly, or when beneficiaries want to honor the trustmaker’s planned distribution. The petition provides a pathway to transfer assets into the trust administration and avoid the public, time-consuming probate process for those items. It also reduces uncertainty and potential disputes by obtaining a court declaration that clarifies ownership and authorizes the trustee to manage and distribute the assets according to the trust’s terms, aligning outcomes with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to protect the trustee from liability. Without court approval, trustees may face personal exposure if they distribute or transfer disputed assets. A Heggstad petition, when granted, gives legal authority for trustee actions and helps insulate administrators from claims arising later. Additionally, this process can be particularly important when assets are sizable, involve title issues, or when family relationships suggest a risk of contest. Securing a court order provides finality and peace of mind for those charged with carrying out the trustmaker’s plan.
Typical circumstances include recently acquired property that was never retitled, accounts that were opened after a trust was executed, mistakes in transferring real estate deeds, or proceeds from a sale that were deposited into nontrust accounts. Situations also arise when a trust is drafted but the funding steps were not completed due to illness or oversight. Family members may discover these gaps only after the trustmaker dies, prompting the need for a judicial determination to place the asset under the trust’s control and ensure distribution consistent with the trust.
When a trustmaker purchases property but the deed is not changed into the trust’s name, the asset remains technically outside the trust despite the intention to fund it. After death, heirs may need the court to confirm that the property should pass under the trust. A Heggstad petition presents the evidence showing the intent to transfer ownership to the trust and requests that the court declare the property as trust-owned. Resolving real estate title issues through a petition simplifies subsequent property transfer and protects beneficiaries’ expectations under the trust.
Accounts opened or maintained in the decedent’s individual name, rather than in the trust, can create confusion after death. If the account holder intended those funds to be part of the trust, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the account as trust property. Supporting documentation such as account statements, beneficiary communications, and draft planning records helps show the decedent’s intention. When successful, the ruling allows the trustee to take control of those funds and distribute them under the trust without full probate administration for the account.
Sometimes proceeds from a sale, insurance payouts, or other assets end up held by third parties in the decedent’s name rather than the trust. In those cases, a Heggstad petition can request a court order directing the third party to recognize the trust’s claim to the funds. Evidence that the proceeds were intended for the trust, such as closing documents, insurance designations, or written instructions, supports the petition. Securing court authority helps compel third parties to transfer funds to the trustee for distribution under the trust terms.
If you are facing omitted trust assets in Stratford or elsewhere in Kings County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help you assess options and pursue the right path to secure those assets for trust administration. We assist in gathering documents, preparing petitions, communicating with interested parties, and navigating court procedures to resolve funding gaps. The goal is to align outcomes with the trustmaker’s documented wishes while minimizing delay and expense for family members. Local knowledge of California probate rules and practical courtroom experience guide the approach to each case.
The firm provides calm, practical guidance for families handling omitted assets and post-death trust administration matters. We begin by reviewing all relevant documents to evaluate whether a petition is appropriate and viable, then outline the evidence needed to support a favorable result. Our process emphasizes clear communication with clients, careful assembly of the record, and prompt action to meet court deadlines. Clients appreciate a grounded approach that focuses on achieving the legal relief necessary to honor the trustmaker’s intentions and move the estate forward.
We also prioritize working cooperatively with beneficiaries and financial institutions when possible to resolve matters without unnecessary litigation. When disputes arise, the firm prepares measured, well-supported filings and advocates for the most efficient route to a court determination. Our aim is to limit cost and delay while obtaining definitive legal authority for trustees to manage and distribute the assets. By considering both settlement and courtroom options, we tailor the strategy to each family’s situation and priorities in a manner that aims to preserve relationships and protect assets.
Practical considerations such as the type of asset, valuation requirements, and potential third-party claims shape how we approach each matter. The firm helps clients anticipate objections, obtain necessary valuations or appraisals, and prepare clear declarations or affidavits from witnesses. Whether the case resolves by agreement or requires a contested hearing, our focus remains on obtaining a durable, legally enforceable solution that follows the trust’s terms. We work to keep clients informed at each step so they understand both the immediate options and the likely timeline to resolution.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust document and all related records to assess whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed. We then gather supporting evidence, prepare the petition, and serve interested parties in accordance with California probate procedures. When feasible, we seek resolution through negotiation and documented agreements. If contested, we present the factual record and legal argument at hearings. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries updated, coordinate necessary valuations or title work, and pursue an outcome that places omitted assets under the trust for distribution.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the facts and assembling all documents that can show intent to include the asset in the trust. This includes reviewing the trust, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any relevant drafts. We identify the asset, determine who must be served, and outline the documentary gaps that need addressing. A careful initial review shapes the petition’s strategy and helps estimate likely timelines and costs while informing clients of options for resolving the matter without litigation where possible.
We locate and document the current ownership records for the asset, including deeds, account registrations, or receipts. Confirming exactly how the property is titled and who has control is essential to tailoring the petition and requesting the appropriate court relief. Identifying third parties that hold the asset or related proceeds allows us to notify them and, if necessary, request their cooperation or account records. Accurate identification reduces ambiguity and prepares the case for either negotiated resolution or court review.
Next, we gather evidence that the trustmaker intended the asset to belong to the trust, such as draft trust language, emails, appointment notes, or contemporaneous statements. Affidavits from witnesses who recall instructions or planning meetings can strengthen the record. We organize these materials into a coherent, chronological presentation for the court. Preparing clear exhibits and witness declarations helps the judge understand the context and increases the chance of obtaining a favorable determination that aligns with the trustmaker’s plan.
In this stage, the petition is drafted to describe the omitted asset, explain the legal basis for relief, and present the supporting evidence in a persuasive format. The petition includes factual declarations and exhibits that document the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances of the omission. We ensure proper service on all parties with legal standing to object and provide required notice under California probate rules. Clear, accurate filings and correct service are critical to preserving the court’s jurisdiction and preventing procedural challenges.
We prepare the petition with detailed declarations that narrate the relevant events, attach documentary exhibits, and cite applicable legal authorities supporting the request. The goal is to present an organized file that makes it straightforward for the court to see the intent and facts supporting trust ownership of the asset. Clear exhibits and a well-crafted factual narrative reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding and help move the matter toward resolution without unnecessary delay or repeated filings.
After filing, interested parties must be given notice and an opportunity to respond. We handle service requirements and follow up on any objections or requests for additional information. If objections arise, we evaluate them and pursue appropriate responses, including negotiation, supplemental evidence, or prepared court argument. Responding promptly and strategically to challenges preserves legal options and increases the likelihood of a definitive court ruling that places the asset under trust administration.
If parties agree or objections are resolved, the court may grant the petition on submitted papers and issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property. If a hearing is required, we present the evidence, examine witnesses as needed, and argue for the requested relief. Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the decision, including updating titles, instructing financial institutions, and documenting transfers to the trustee. The final order provides the legal authority for the trustee to distribute the asset according to the trust.
After the judge grants relief, we secure certified copies of the order and provide them to title companies, banks, and other third parties holding the asset. Those entities generally update their records, transfer title, or release funds to the trustee upon presentation of the court order. We coordinate with county recorder offices or financial institutions to complete the administrative steps necessary to place the asset under the trust’s control and make certain the trustee can carry out distributions in accordance with the trust terms.
Once transfers are completed, we help the trustee document the steps taken and ensure records reflect the updated ownership and distributions. Maintaining accurate records helps protect the trustee from later claims and provides transparency for beneficiaries. We can assist with any additional filings required to close related estate matters or to address complementary tasks such as preparing pour-over wills, certification of trust documents, or resolving title or account issues that surfaced during the petition process. Proper closing procedures finalize the administration.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to ask a judge to declare that specific assets should be treated as trust property even though they were not formally titled in the trust at the time of the trustmaker’s death. Consider filing when an asset was clearly intended to be included under the trust, but technical funding steps were missed. The petition focuses on proving intent through documents, witness statements, and actions showing the trustmaker’s consistent plan. It provides a legal path to transfer the asset to the trustee so distribution follows the trust’s terms. Filing is appropriate when beneficiaries want to avoid probate for the specific asset, when title issues need court resolution, or when there is disagreement among heirs about ownership. If all parties agree, informal transfer is sometimes possible, but a court order can provide finality and protection for the trustee. The decision to file depends on the strength of the evidence, the asset’s value, and the likelihood of dispute.
A Heggstad petition aims to have particular items recognized as trust property and administered under the trust, whereas opening a probate estate involves court-supervised administration of assets that pass under a will or have no mechanism to avoid probate. The petition can prevent a specific asset from entering probate by obtaining a court declaration that it belongs to the trust. Probate typically involves broader inventory, creditor notice procedures, and public filings, while a Heggstad petition can limit court involvement to the determination of ownership for the omitted assets. Choosing between the two approaches depends on the overall estate plan and the specific assets involved. When multiple assets are omitted or when probate formalities are unavoidable for other reasons, the probate process may be necessary. When only certain items are at issue and evidence supports treating them as trust property, a Heggstad petition offers a focused remedy to keep those items out of probate.
Documents that most persuasively show intent include the trust instrument itself, draft versions of the trust indicating intent to include the asset, deeds or account statements showing the decedent discussed or attempted to retitle items, and written communications such as emails or letters explaining funding plans. Affidavits or declarations from witnesses, such as family members or advisors who remember the trustmaker’s directions, can supplement documentary evidence. A consistent set of records that point to the same funding intention strengthens the petition’s case. Other helpful evidence includes contemporaneous notes, transaction histories that align with the trust timeline, and records of estate planning meetings. The more coherent and corroborated the evidence, the more likely a court will find that the asset was intended to be part of the trust. Lack of direct documentation does not always preclude relief, but it makes the factual presentation and witness credibility more important.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition. If objections are filed, the court may schedule a hearing to consider evidence from both sides. The opposing party might contest the existence of intent, the authenticity of documents, or assertion of competing rights. When objections occur, the petitioner must respond with further evidence or legal argument to support the claim that the asset belongs to the trust. The court will weigh the credibility of the submissions and issue a ruling based on the preponderance of the evidence. Objections do not necessarily prevent a favorable outcome; they require the petitioner to demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent more convincingly. Negotiation or mediation may resolve disputes before a contested hearing. If unresolved, a judge’s decision provides finality and creates a clear legal basis for the trustee to take action in accordance with the order.
Timing varies depending on whether the petition is contested, the court’s schedule, and how quickly parties provide required documents. An uncontested petition may be resolved in a matter of months if the evidence is clear and parties cooperate. Contested matters can take longer due to discovery, witness preparation, and hearing dates. Local court calendars in Kings County influence scheduling, and additional time may be required for valuations or title work in complex cases. Working proactively to gather documents and respond promptly to requests can shorten the timeline. Early communication with interested parties and financial institutions can also reduce delays. While speed is desirable, careful preparation improves the chances of a successful outcome and helps avoid repeated filings or appeals that could extend the process significantly.
A Heggstad petition can help keep the distribution of the affected asset private to the extent it resolves the matter without opening a broader probate estate. Trust administration typically remains private, and when a court declares the property to be trust property, subsequent actions by the trustee are generally handled within the trust framework rather than public probate filings. However, the petition itself is a court filing and becomes part of the public record, so some details will be accessible through the court system. Overall, the petition often leads to greater privacy than a full probate administration, because it limits the public aspects to the ownership determination while allowing trustee-managed distribution to proceed privately once the court’s order is obtained and provided to relevant third parties.
When real estate has title issues, a Heggstad petition can request that the court issue an order clarifying ownership and directing county recorder or title companies to update deeds accordingly. Real property matters often require careful preparation, including documentary proof of intent and possibly a title report or related documentation. Resolving title problems through a court order provides the necessary legal foundation for retitling and avoids future disputes over the property’s status, facilitating a clear transfer to the trustee for distribution under the trust. If third parties such as lenders or lienholders have claims, those matters may need to be addressed in tandem with the petition. We coordinate with title companies, obtain required clearances, and incorporate necessary remedies into the petition or follow-up documentation to ensure the transfer is effective and properly recorded in the county where the property is located.
There are costs associated with filing a Heggstad petition, including court filing fees, service of process fees, possible appraisal or title search costs, and attorney fees for preparing the petition and representing clients in hearings. If disputes arise, costs can increase due to additional filings, discovery, and potential expert reports. When parties agree or the evidence is compelling, the process may be more economical than opening a full probate estate for the affected assets, but it still requires careful handling to achieve the intended result. We discuss likely costs and possible alternatives during an initial consultation and provide estimates based on the asset type, anticipated evidence needs, and whether the matter appears contested. Early planning to collect documents and identify potential objections can help manage expenses and focus resources where they will be most effective.
If all beneficiaries and interested parties agree that an asset should be treated as trust property, they may be able to complete transfers without a court order by providing written consents and coordinating with the financial institution or title company. However, a court order provides stronger legal protection for the trustee and reduces the risk of later claims. Where third parties require formal direction or where title issues exist, a Heggstad petition and court order are often the most reliable path to effect transfer and insure against later disputes. Even with agreement, it is prudent to document the consensus and confirm that third parties will accept private documentation in lieu of a court order. When uncertainty or potential challenges exist, obtaining judicial recognition through a petition provides finality and protects the trustee from future liability arising from distribution decisions.
To begin, contact our office to schedule an initial consultation so we can review the trust, the omitted asset, and any supporting documents you have gathered. During the first meeting we assess the strength of the available evidence, identify additional records needed, and outline the likely steps to prepare and file a petition if appropriate. We also explain timelines, required notices, and anticipated costs so you can make informed decisions about the best path forward for your family. If you decide to proceed, we assist in collecting supporting documentation, prepare the petition and declarations, and handle the filing and service process. We keep you informed at each stage, respond to objections if they arise, and work to finalize the matter efficiently so the trustee can administer the asset in accordance with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas