At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, clients in Stratford and throughout Kings County turn to our firm for clear guidance on trust modification petitions. A trust modification petition can address changed circumstances, tax concerns, or drafting errors in an existing trust. This introduction explains what a petition can accomplish, typical timelines, and how local courts generally handle requests to modify trust terms. We focus on practical planning that protects beneficiaries and aligns the trust with current family and financial realities while complying with California law and local probate court procedures.
This guide is designed for trustees, beneficiaries, and family members who are considering a trust modification petition in Stratford. You will learn about the legal standards used by California courts, common reasons for seeking modification, and potential outcomes so you can make informed decisions. The content highlights steps to prepare documentation, how hearings typically proceed, and what evidence supports a favorable court decision. Our goal is to provide accessible, actionable information so you understand whether a petition is appropriate and how to organize your case for the best possible resolution.
A trust modification petition can preserve the original intent of the settlor while adapting to new circumstances that were not anticipated at the time the trust was created. Modifying a trust can correct drafting ambiguities, address changed family dynamics, update tax planning strategies, or fix administrative problems that prevent proper distribution. The primary benefit is maintaining continuity of asset management and distribution while reducing the likelihood of future disputes. Well-documented petitions can prevent lengthy litigation by providing the court with clear reasons for the requested changes and evidence supporting the request.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California, including Stratford and surrounding communities. Our practice focuses on estate planning matters such as revocable living trusts, trust modifications, pour-over wills, and related petitions. We emphasize methodical preparation, detailed documentation, and a client-centered approach that prioritizes clear communication. When assisting with trust modification petitions, we review the trust instrument, relevant records, and family circumstances to develop a strategy that aligns with legal requirements and your desired outcome. Clients benefit from straightforward advice and practical next steps tailored to their situation.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court asking for a change to the terms or administration of an existing trust. Grounds for modification can vary and may include clerical errors, ambiguity in language, changed circumstances like the incapacity of a trustee or beneficiary needs, or new tax or asset protection considerations. The process usually begins with a careful review of the trust document, notice to interested parties, and filing detailed pleadings with the court. The petition should show why the modification serves the trust’s purpose or corrects a mistake while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
California law provides specific procedures and standards for trust modifications, and courts will consider the settlor’s intent, the language of the trust, and surrounding evidence when deciding whether to grant a petition. Parties are often required to attempt resolution through discussion before judicial intervention. When matters proceed to court, hearings focus on legal authority and equitable considerations. It is important to gather supporting documents, such as financial records, communications, and medical evidence when appropriate, so the court can evaluate whether the requested change is appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s goals.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing that asks the court to alter the terms, administration, or interpretation of a trust. The petition outlines the reasons for the requested change, provides legal and factual support, and identifies the specific provisions to be modified. Courts may approve modifications to correct drafting errors, reflect the settlor’s proven intent, or adapt to circumstances that make the original terms unworkable. The petition process often includes notices to beneficiaries and interested parties, an opportunity for objections, and a hearing where the court evaluates whether the proposed change protects the settlor’s wishes and beneficiaries’ interests.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear statement of the requested change, supporting evidence of why the change is necessary or appropriate, and documentation showing notice to affected parties. The process often requires drafting a proposed order, assembling trust and financial records, and preparing declarations from witnesses. Court procedures include filing the petition, serving interested parties, responding to any objections, and attending a hearing. Attention to procedural requirements and careful preparation of factual support are essential to help the court understand how the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent.
Familiarity with common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the modification process. Important concepts include the settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, trust instrument, standing, and judicial standards for modification. Knowing these terms clarifies who must be notified, what evidence is persuasive, and what remedies the court can grant. A glossary below explains commonly used words and phrases you are likely to encounter while preparing or responding to a petition. Understanding these terms supports effective communication with counsel and more efficient case preparation.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and established its terms and objectives. The settlor’s intent is central to most trust disputes and modifications; courts look to the settlor’s expressed wishes in the trust instrument and relevant surrounding evidence. If the settlor is alive, their written or demonstrated intent may be directly considered. If the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, the court relies on the trust document and admissible evidence to interpret intent. Understanding the settlor’s role helps clarify whether a modification aligns with the trust’s original purpose.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Duties of the trustee include prudent asset management, following the trust’s distribution provisions, and providing required accounting to beneficiaries. A trustee may file or oppose a trust modification petition depending on whether the requested change affects administration responsibilities or asset distribution. Trustees must act in the beneficiaries’ best interests while adhering to the trust’s terms and applicable state law.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have standing to be notified of petitions that affect their interests and may object to proposed modifications. When evaluating a petition, courts weigh how a change would affect beneficiaries and whether the modification preserves the settlor’s intent. Beneficiaries may request accountings, information about trust administration, and participate in hearings to protect their rights. Clear communication among trustees and beneficiaries can reduce disputes and streamline resolution.
Standing refers to a party’s legal right to bring or challenge a petition in court, typically based on a direct interest in the trust’s outcome. Judicial review is the process by which the court examines the petition, supporting evidence, and any objections to determine whether a modification is appropriate. Courts apply legal standards that consider intent, fairness, and statutory authority. Parties should ensure they have proper standing before filing or objecting and prepare thorough evidence and legal arguments that address both statutory criteria and equitable considerations.
When circumstances change, property owners and trustees may consider several legal approaches, including informal agreement among interested parties, court-ordered modification, or creating a new trust subject to the terms of the original. Informal amendments can be efficient when all beneficiaries and trustees agree, but some changes require court approval to be legally binding. A trust modification petition is the formal path when legal authority or disputes prevent a simple amendment. Understanding the benefits and limits of each option helps parties select the approach most likely to achieve a stable, legally enforceable result.
A limited approach can be appropriate when trustees and all beneficiaries reach an informed agreement to address a minor error or to clarify ambiguous language. Such consensus allows parties to execute an amendment or restatement consistent with the trust’s original intent, often without court intervention. Documenting the agreement thoroughly and updating trust records minimizes future misunderstandings. When the settlor is available and supports the change, executing a formal amendment can be the most efficient route. Open communication and careful recordkeeping are key to ensuring the amendment is enforceable and reflects the parties’ intentions.
Administrative adjustments, such as correcting account information, changing trustee contact details, or updating administrative procedures, may not require a court petition if they do not alter distribution rights or the trust’s core purpose. Trustees should document changes and provide notice to beneficiaries to maintain transparency. For routine administrative matters, maintaining clear communications and preserving documentation can prevent disputes. If uncertainty exists about whether a change affects substantive rights, seeking legal guidance before proceeding helps protect trustees and beneficiaries from unintended consequences.
Complex family situations, conflicting beneficiary interests, or significant financial consequences often require a comprehensive legal approach. When disputes arise over interpretation or when proposed changes affect tax treatment, creditor protection, or major asset transfers, careful legal analysis and formal court involvement help ensure the trust modifications are legally sound and durable. Comprehensive preparation includes gathering financial records, witness statements, medical documentation when relevant, and clear legal arguments that consider statutory standards and equitable principles to present a persuasive petition to the court.
When beneficiaries or trustees cannot reach agreement and negotiations fail, the matter may require judicial resolution. In contested situations, a comprehensive approach includes pre-filing investigations, evaluation of evidence, drafting persuasive pleadings, and preparing for hearings. Courts assess credibility, legal authority, and whether the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent. Preparing a detailed record and addressing potential objections in advance increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the chance of protracted litigation that can deplete trust assets and strain family relationships.
A comprehensive petition strategy helps protect the interests of both trustees and beneficiaries by ensuring that proposed changes are clearly justified, properly documented, and legally enforceable. Detailed preparation reduces surprises at hearing, minimizes procedural defects, and demonstrates respect for statutory notice and procedural requirements. Judges are more likely to approve modifications when the record shows careful consideration of the settlor’s intent and the effect on beneficiaries. This approach also helps identify and resolve peripheral issues early, such as tax consequences or creditor claims, before they jeopardize the trust’s purpose.
Comprehensive preparation also supports amicable resolution where possible by presenting clear options and potential outcomes to all parties. When beneficiaries understand the implications of different approaches and see that proposals are well supported, they are often more willing to cooperate. Even in contested cases, a thorough record reduces the time and cost of proceedings by narrowing disputed issues. The result is a higher probability of durable decisions that respect the settlor’s intent and provide a predictable path for trust administration going forward.
One significant benefit of a comprehensive approach is clear documentation that anticipates and addresses common objections, which in turn reduces the risk of extended litigation. By compiling relevant records, drafting thorough declarations, and presenting a coherent legal argument, petitioners help the court see why a modification is justified. Clear documentation also assists trustees in maintaining transparency and fulfilling duties to beneficiaries. Having a solid record can prevent future disputes and create a stable foundation for trust administration that reflects current circumstances while honoring the settlor’s stated goals.
A well-prepared petition increases the chances of efficient court resolution, which helps preserve trust assets that might otherwise be consumed by protracted legal battles. By narrowing contested issues and presenting persuasive evidence up front, parties can reduce hearing time and limit discovery costs. Efficient resolution protects the value of the estate for beneficiaries and decreases emotional strain on family members. Thoughtful planning also enables trustees to implement changes that improve administration and reduce ongoing compliance burdens, resulting in smoother trust management over time.
Begin by assembling the original trust document, any amendments, related financial records, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent and the trust’s administration. A comprehensive document review reveals ambiguous provisions, possible drafting errors, and areas where clarification or correction is needed. Identifying these issues early helps determine whether a simple amendment, a restatement, or a court petition is the best path. Accurate records also support better communication with beneficiaries and form the foundation of persuasive declarations and exhibits for court filings.
Gather relevant evidence, including financial statements, medical records when appropriate, communications with the settlor, and sworn declarations from witnesses who can attest to circumstances that support the petition. Well-crafted declarations explain the facts in a clear and organized manner, linking evidence to the legal standards the court will apply. Exhibits should be labeled and referenced in pleadings to make it easy for the judge to evaluate the request. Solid evidentiary support increases the likelihood of gaining court approval and reduces the scope of objections from interested parties.
People consider trust modification petitions for many reasons, including incorrect or ambiguous language in the trust, changes in family relationships, the need to address newly acquired assets, or unanticipated tax consequences. A petition may be appropriate when a trustee lacks authority to perform necessary functions or when a distribution plan no longer meets beneficiaries’ needs. Seeking a petition can clarify administration responsibilities and align the trust with present circumstances. Understanding these common triggers helps trustees and beneficiaries evaluate whether a petition is the appropriate next step.
Other reasons for pursuing a petition include correcting clerical mistakes, reconciling inconsistent provisions between documents, or updating terms to comply with new legal developments. Sometimes changing family dynamics, such as remarriage or the birth of grandchildren, warrants revisiting distribution plans to ensure fairness and practicality. When significant assets are at stake or when a trust impacts long-term caregiving and support arrangements, formal modification provides legal certainty and prevents future disputes by creating a court-verified record of the settled terms.
Common circumstances that prompt trust modification petitions include ambiguous drafting that hinders administration, discovery of unanticipated debts or creditor claims, a beneficiary’s disability or special needs requiring different support arrangements, or a trustee’s incapacity or resignation. Life events such as marriages, divorces, or the need to provide for a dependent with special needs can also necessitate an adjustment. In these situations, a court-supervised modification can provide a legally enforceable path to resolve issues while maintaining fidelity to the settlor’s intent.
Ambiguities or conflicting clauses in trust documents can create uncertainty about distribution and administration. When language is unclear, trustees may be unsure how to proceed and beneficiaries may have differing interpretations. A trust modification petition can resolve these inconsistencies by asking the court for a construction or change that reflects the settlor’s intent. The process typically involves presenting the trust instrument and supporting evidence such as drafts, communications, or contemporaneous records that clarify how provisions were meant to operate in practice.
Significant changes in family circumstances or financial conditions often prompt trust modifications. For example, a beneficiary who develops a disability, a trustee who becomes unable to serve, or substantial shifts in asset values may require revising distribution plans or administrative powers. A petition allows the court to consider evidence showing why existing terms are impractical and what modifications would better accomplish the trust’s purpose. Addressing these matters through a formal petition can offer clarity and preserve the trust’s value for intended beneficiaries.
Drafting errors or omissions discovered after a trust is executed can hinder its administration and may require correction through a petition. Additionally, changes in tax law or financial objectives can make prior provisions outdated or disadvantageous. A trust modification petition can correct mistakes and update terms to align with the settlor’s likely intent while addressing tax or estate planning considerations. Proper documentation linking the requested changes to the settlor’s established goals helps persuade the court that the modification is justified.
Residents of Stratford and Kings County seeking assistance with trust modification petitions can contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for practical guidance. We help clients assess whether a petition is necessary, gather supporting documentation, and prepare concise pleadings that comply with California probate court procedures. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, managing expectations about timelines and likely outcomes, and focusing on solutions that preserve trust assets and reduce the risk of future disputes. Call or email to arrange a consultation to review your situation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer personalized legal support for trust modification matters in Stratford and across California. We approach each case with thorough document review, careful assessment of legal standards, and attention to procedural detail to prepare persuasive petitions. We prioritize clear explanations of options and expected outcomes so clients understand the process and can make well-informed decisions. Our goal is to achieve resolutions that preserve trust value and honor the settlor’s intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and minimizing unnecessary conflict.
When preparing a trust modification petition, we focus on gathering high-quality supporting evidence, presenting logical and statute-based arguments, and ensuring strict compliance with notice and filing requirements. This meticulous preparation reduces procedural risk and helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently. We work closely with trustees and family members to identify potential objections early and propose practical solutions that can lead to cooperative resolutions whenever possible. Our process is designed to reduce uncertainty and deliver clear next steps at each stage of the matter.
We also assist with related estate planning documents that often interact with trust modifications, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and certification of trust. Coordinating these documents with any requested trust changes helps ensure the settlor’s broader estate plan remains cohesive. Members of the community value our attention to detail, responsiveness, and steady guidance through what can be an emotionally charged process, enabling clients to focus on family needs while legal matters are addressed.
At our firm, the process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust document, identify the issues, and determine the proper legal pathway. We then assemble necessary records, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and handle required notices to beneficiaries and interested parties. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present a clear factual and legal record designed to assist the court’s decision. Throughout, we keep clients informed about scheduling, required documents, and likely outcomes so they can make thoughtful choices at each step.
The first step involves a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, amendments, and related records to identify ambiguities, potential defects, and the scope of requested changes. We evaluate standing and the likelihood that the court will grant the petition under California law. This stage includes identifying necessary witnesses and evidence, mapping out interested parties for notice, and creating a litigation plan or a negotiation strategy aimed at resolving disputes without court intervention when feasible. Solid planning at this stage shapes the petition’s strength.
Collecting the original trust, any amendments, account statements, correspondence, and relevant medical or financial records is essential to supporting a petition. These materials demonstrate the trust’s history, the settlor’s likely intent, and the factual basis for the requested change. Properly labeled exhibits and organized documentation make it easier for the court to review the case and reduce delays. During this phase, we also create a timeline of events that highlights key facts and supports the narrative presented in the petition and declarations.
Identifying all beneficiaries, potential creditors, and other interested parties is critical to ensure statutory notice requirements are met. Proper service of notice prevents procedural challenges that could invalidate a petition or delay proceedings. We prepare clear notices and coordinate service to confirm receipt by all necessary parties. Early outreach can also open channels for negotiation, reducing the need for contested hearings. Providing timely, accurate notice is both a legal requirement and a step that fosters transparency and fairness in the process.
After planning and document gathering, we draft a petition that clearly states the relief sought, the factual and legal basis for modification, and a proposed order for the court. The petition includes supporting declarations and exhibits that provide the evidence necessary for the court to evaluate the request. Once filed, the petition must be served on interested parties in accordance with statute. We monitor responses, prepare replies to objections if they arise, and work toward narrowing contested issues ahead of any hearing.
Preparing clear, well-structured pleadings and exhibits helps the court quickly understand the requested changes and the supporting facts. Each exhibit is referenced and explained in declarations to connect evidence with legal arguments. Attention to clarity and organization reduces confusion and demonstrates that the requested modification is reasonable and supported. Well-crafted pleadings also facilitate settlement discussions by outlining the strengths of the petition and potential areas for compromise, which can lead to faster and less costly resolutions for all parties involved.
After filing the petition, the next critical tasks are serving all interested parties and responding promptly to any objections or motions they file. Properly addressing objections often involves providing additional declarations or evidence, clarifying ambiguities, and proposing reasonable alternatives. Engaging constructively with objecting parties can lead to partial settlements that narrow disputed issues before a hearing. When court appearances are necessary, being well-prepared to address objections and present concise legal arguments improves the chance of a favorable outcome.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, the court will evaluate the petition, supporting evidence, and any objections to determine whether the modification should be approved. Hearings typically focus on whether the proposed change reflects the settlor’s intent, whether it is equitable to beneficiaries, and whether statutory standards are met. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or order alternative relief. After a decision, parties receive an order that outlines the approved changes and any conditions for implementing them, providing the legal basis for revised trust administration.
During hearings, presenting concise evidence and witness testimony that directly addresses the legal standards can strengthen a petitioner’s position. Declarations often substitute for live testimony, but in contested matters witnesses may appear to provide sworn statements. Demonstrating a logical connection between the facts and the requested change helps the court make a reasoned decision. Preparation includes rehearsing direct points, organizing exhibits for easy reference, and ensuring that testimony supports the narrative in the pleadings without introducing unnecessary complications.
If the court approves a modification, the final order will specify the amended trust terms and any conditions for implementation. Trustees must follow the court’s directives, update trust records, and provide notice and accounting to affected beneficiaries as required. Implementing approved changes may involve transferring assets, updating bank or brokerage account registrations, or amending related estate planning documents. Careful execution of the court’s order completes the process and helps ensure that the trust functions effectively under its revised terms moving forward.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust. It is used when informal amendments are not possible, when there are ambiguities or errors in the trust document, or when changing circumstances make the original provisions impractical. Filing a petition provides a clear, legally enforceable path to correct or adapt the trust while ensuring that interested parties have notice and an opportunity to raise objections. The petition sets out the specific changes sought and includes supporting evidence such as the trust instrument, financial records, and declarations. The court will review the petition under applicable legal standards and consider factors such as the settlor’s intent and the effect on beneficiaries. Preparing a well-documented petition increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution and helps avoid future disputes over trust administration.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on factors like the complexity of the requested changes, whether there are objections, and court scheduling. For uncontested matters, the process can sometimes be resolved within a few months, including time for notice, filing, and court review. Contested petitions or matters requiring extensive discovery can take considerably longer, often stretching into many months or more, depending on the need for hearings and responses. Early planning and clear communication with interested parties can shorten the timeline. Preparing complete documentation, addressing likely objections in advance, and pursuing negotiated settlements when feasible help reduce delays and minimize court appearances. Staying responsive to procedural requirements and court requests also contributes to a more efficient process.
When filing a trust modification petition, interested parties who must receive notice typically include all named beneficiaries, current trustees, and any persons with a financial interest in the trust’s outcome. Depending on the situation, other parties such as creditors or contingent beneficiaries may require notice. Proper service ensures that parties have an opportunity to object and prevents procedural challenges that could invalidate the petition. Failure to provide appropriate notice can delay proceedings or require refiling. It is important to identify everyone with a legal interest early in the process, confirm current contact information, and follow statutory service methods. Documenting service and keeping records of communications helps demonstrate compliance with notice requirements and supports the integrity of the petition.
A trustee generally has authority to perform duties spelled out in the trust instrument, but the power to modify substantive terms is often limited. Minor administrative changes that do not alter beneficiaries’ rights or the trust’s core purpose may be handled by the trustee under the trust’s existing powers. However, substantive changes that affect distributions or the settlor’s intent typically require court approval or the consent of all affected parties. When a proposed change might affect beneficiaries’ interests or exceed the trustee’s authority, filing a trust modification petition is the appropriate step. Courts evaluate whether the trustee’s actions align with the trust’s terms and applicable law. Trustees should document their authority and seek guidance before making significant changes that could be challenged.
Strong evidence for a trust modification petition includes the original trust document and any amendments, communications or drafts that show the settlor’s intent, financial records demonstrating changed circumstances, and medical or other records when relevant. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s statements or the context of certain decisions can be persuasive. Clear, organized exhibits that directly connect facts to the requested modification make it easier for the court to grant relief. Chronologies and labeled exhibits help judges and opposing parties understand the factual basis for the petition. Demonstrating that the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s goals, and explaining why existing terms are no longer workable, strengthen the petition. Attention to detail in preparing and presenting evidence reduces the chance that objections will derail the request.
Courts decide whether to approve a modification by examining the trust instrument, applicable statutes, and the evidence presented about the settlor’s intent and the effects on beneficiaries. The judge considers whether the proposed modification is consistent with the trust’s purpose, whether it corrects an error or addresses unanticipated circumstances, and whether it is fair to the beneficiaries. The strength of documentary and testimonial evidence plays an important role in the court’s determination. Courts also consider procedural factors such as whether proper notice was given and whether interested parties had an opportunity to be heard. A well-prepared petition that anticipates legal standards and addresses potential objections is more likely to persuade the court that modification is warranted and appropriate.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will consider their objections as part of the hearing process. Objecting parties may file declarations, present evidence, and request discovery to challenge the factual or legal basis for the petition. Objections can delay the process and may result in contested hearings where the court weighs competing evidence and arguments before issuing a decision. Resolving objections often involves negotiations to narrow disputed issues or propose alternative language that addresses concerns. Mediation or settlement discussions can be effective in reducing conflict. When settlement is not possible, thorough preparation for hearings and strong, well-supported legal pleadings are key to addressing objections and persuading the court to approve appropriate modifications.
Modifying a trust can affect related estate planning documents, such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives, because these instruments often operate together within an overall plan. After a modification, it is important to review related documents to ensure consistency and to update any provisions that reference the trust. Failure to coordinate these documents can lead to unintended consequences or conflicts during administration. Coordinated updates preserve the integrity of the estate plan and ensure that all documents reflect the settlor’s current wishes and practical realities. Trustees and family members should review beneficiary designations, account registrations, and successor trustee appointments to confirm they align with the revised trust terms and provide clear guidance for future administration.
Yes, trusts can often be modified after the settlor’s death, but the standards and permissible grounds for modification may be different than during the settlor’s lifetime. Courts generally focus on the settlor’s intent and may allow modifications to correct errors, respond to changed circumstances, or address unforeseen administrative issues. Evidence such as drafts, correspondence, and testimony about the settlor’s intentions is particularly important in post-death petition matters. Post-death modifications typically require a showing that the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s intent or necessary to carry out the trust’s purpose. Because the settlor cannot speak for themselves, courts rely heavily on documentary and witness evidence. Parties should prepare a clear factual record and be ready to address objections that focus on protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
To reduce disputes over trust terms, consider maintaining clear, updated estate planning documents, keeping records of the settlor’s intentions and communications, and encouraging open family conversations about the plan. Regularly reviewing and updating documents when circumstances change, and documenting reasons for material decisions, helps create a record that clarifies intent and reduces ambiguity. Including successor trustee contact information and explicit distribution instructions also minimizes confusion in administration. When changes are contemplated, involving beneficiaries in discussions and providing transparent explanations about the rationale for proposed updates can help build consensus. Maintaining organized records, labeling drafts, and preserving relevant communications can provide valuable evidence later, making it easier to implement amendments or obtain court-approved modifications if needed.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas