If a trust beneficiary or trustee discovers that certain assets were not properly transferred into a revocable living trust before a decedent passed away, a Heggstad petition can provide a path to have those assets treated as trust property. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Cobb and throughout Lake County understand how a Heggstad petition works, what evidence is needed to support the request, and what outcomes to expect. This guide explains the petition process in plain language and outlines how common estate planning documents such as pour-over wills and transfer documents interact with trust administration and probate alternatives.
A Heggstad petition often arises when a decedent intended certain assets to be part of a living trust but formal transfer steps were incomplete. Typical examples include real property still titled in a deceased person’s name, retirement accounts, or bank accounts not retitled to the trust. The petition asks the court to recognize that the asset should be considered owned by the trust as of the date of death, avoiding a full probate for that property. This page walks through legal concepts, common circumstances, and practical steps for those pursuing or responding to a Heggstad petition in Cobb, California.
A Heggstad petition can protect a decedent’s clear intent that assets be administered under a trust, reduce the estate’s exposure to a broader probate proceeding, and preserve the efficiencies associated with trust administration. When successful, the petition allows trust beneficiaries to treat qualifying assets as trust property for purposes of distribution and management, often resulting in greater privacy and faster resolution than formal probate. In many cases, the petition also helps avoid additional court-supervised processes, conserves estate assets that would otherwise be consumed by court costs, and clarifies title for third parties such as banks or county recorders.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists individuals and families across California with estate planning and trust administration issues, including petitions to have assets treated as trust property. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, transfer records, and facts surrounding the decedent’s intent. We work collaboratively with clients to prepare the necessary declarations, gather supporting evidence, and present issues clearly to the court and other parties. While serving clients in Cobb and Lake County, our goal is to resolve disputes efficiently and to help trustees and beneficiaries move forward with trust administration in a predictable and cost-conscious manner.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to determine that property which was intended to be part of a trust should be treated as trust property even though formal transfer steps were not completed during the decedent’s lifetime. The petition relies on proof of intent, supporting documents such as the trust instrument, and evidence showing that the decedent took steps toward funding the trust or otherwise intended the asset to be included. Filing a petition starts a court process where evidence is considered, interested persons can respond, and the judge issues an order establishing the asset’s proper status for administration and distribution purposes.
The Heggstad petition process is fact-specific and requires careful attention to timing, documentation, and statutory requirements. It may involve title transfers, bank declarations, declarations from witnesses, and review of related estate planning instruments such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and certificates of trust. A petition can be used by trustees or beneficiaries to clear title and avoid a probate administration for the asset at issue. Courts will examine whether the decedent intended the transfer to be effective during lifetime or at death and whether actions taken were consistent with funding the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing under California probate law that seeks a judicial declaration that property should be treated as if it had been transferred to a trust in the decedent’s lifetime or at least that the trust should control distribution of that property. The petition typically includes the trust document, evidence of the decedent’s intent, and proof of any actions taken to transfer or encumber the property. Courts apply case law standards to determine if the asset belongs with the trust, examining whether the decedent’s conduct and surrounding circumstances establish that intent to fund the trust.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts look for objective evidence of the decedent’s intent, such as written instruments, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, and witness declarations. Procedural steps include preparing the petition, serving interested parties, submitting supporting documentation and declarations, and attending hearings when disputes arise. The court may order that the property be treated as trust property only after it finds clear indications of intent and appropriate legal justification. Understanding each element of the case early helps streamline the process and reduces the risk of contested litigation.
This glossary clarifies terms commonly encountered in Heggstad petition matters, such as funding, title, pour-over will, trustee, beneficiary, and probate. Knowing these definitions helps trustees and family members follow the petition process and evaluate what evidence is useful. It also explains how commonly used estate planning documents interact and what courts typically look for when assessing whether property should be regarded as part of a trust. A clear understanding of these terms can prevent misunderstandings and make it easier to gather the documentation needed to support a petition or to respond to one.
Funding a trust refers to the process of transferring legal title of assets to the trust so the trustee can manage and distribute them according to the trust’s terms. Funding may involve changing the title on real property, retitling bank and investment accounts, naming the trust as beneficiary of retirement accounts, or assigning personal property into the trust. Proper funding is important to avoid probate and to enable the trust to operate as intended. A Heggstad petition addresses instances where funding was incomplete and seeks to align administration with the decedent’s intent.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any property still titled in the decedent’s name at death to be transferred into the trust. While a pour-over will can help ensure that assets become part of the trust, property passing through a pour-over will may still be subject to probate. A Heggstad petition may be filed to show the decedent intended certain assets to be included in the trust, and to avoid treating that property as subject to a full probate administration when supporting evidence is present that a transfer into the trust was intended.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust’s provisions, while beneficiaries are those entitled to receive benefits from the trust. In Heggstad petition proceedings, trustees or beneficiaries may file petitions or oppose them depending on the facts. The court considers the trust instrument and supporting evidence to determine proper ownership and administration. Clear documentary evidence showing the decedent intended the trust to control the asset can be persuasive to the court when assigning property to the trust.
Title and record documents include deeds, account statements, vehicle registrations, and similar records that show legal ownership of assets. These records are often central to a Heggstad petition because they establish how assets were titled at death. Supporting documentation like transfer forms, recorded quitclaim deeds, declarations from financial institutions, and contemporaneous correspondence can help demonstrate intent to transfer property to the trust. Courts weigh title records alongside other evidence when deciding whether an asset should be treated as trust property.
When property intended for a trust remains outside the trust, interested parties can pursue different paths: filing a Heggstad petition, initiating traditional probate, or attempting informal resolution through documentation and institution cooperation. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that avoids full probate for the specific asset, while probate administration addresses all estate assets through court-supervised distribution. Informal resolution may work when financial institutions accept trust-related documents or transfer forms, but when institutions decline, a petition or probate may be required to clear title and allow distribution according to the decedent’s intent.
A limited approach may suffice when banks, brokers, or county recorders readily accept documents and retitle assets without court intervention. If institutions will accept a trust certificate, a recorded deed, beneficiary designation or other proof of intent and ownership, trustees or beneficiaries can often avoid litigation. Clear, contemporaneous documentation such as a signed deed or account change request can assist in persuading third parties to transfer assets to the trust. When institutions are cooperative, informal resolution can be quicker, less costly, and less adversarial than court proceedings.
When assets are modest in value and all interested parties agree on the intended disposition, it may be appropriate to complete transfers using simple corrective documents or to obtain institutional confirmations, avoiding a petition. Informal transfers can be efficient if beneficiaries and trustees present consistent paperwork that shows the decedent’s intentions. However, even with agreement, it is important to document the transaction clearly and retain records in case questions arise later. Carefully handling these transfers helps prevent disputes and preserves the decedent’s goals for distribution.
A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when there is disagreement among heirs or when the evidence of intent is ambiguous. In contested situations, formal pleadings, declarations from witnesses, discovery, and court hearings may be required to resolve ownership questions. Courts will consider the weight of documentation and testimony, and a carefully prepared petition presents those facts persuasively. Using a full legal process helps protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries and reduces the risk of later challenges to the distribution of the asset.
Complex titles, missing deeds, jointly owned property with unclear survivorship rights, or institutions that refuse to recognize trust documents often necessitate formal legal action. When third parties decline to cooperate or when the asset in question has significant value, a Heggstad petition may be the most reliable path to clear title and effect distribution. The formal process can compel resolution, obtain court endorsement of the trust’s claim, and create an enforceable record that simplifies future transactions involving the property.
A comprehensive legal approach provides clarity and finality when addressing assets omitted from trust funding. By assembling robust documentation, presenting clear legal arguments, and securing a court order when necessary, trustees and beneficiaries gain a dependable determination that aligns with the decedent’s intentions. This reduces the chance of subsequent disputes and provides greater certainty for third parties who may need to retitle property. The result is a smoother administration process and a better chance of honoring the wishes expressed in estate planning documents.
Comprehensive representation can also improve efficiency in the long run. Although litigation requires time and resources, resolving ownership questions through appropriate legal channels prevents protracted challenges and ambiguous title issues later. With a clear court order, banks and government agencies are more likely to cooperate, transactions can proceed, and beneficiaries can receive distributions without repeated delays. Investing in a thorough approach upfront can save estate assets and reduce the emotional strain on family members during an already difficult time.
One major benefit of pursuing a thorough legal process is the finality it brings to title and ownership issues. A court order resolving a Heggstad petition establishes a clear public record that the asset is to be administered under the trust. This clarity helps prevent later disputes, simplifies sale or transfer of property, and allows trustees to manage and distribute assets consistent with the trust’s terms. The formal resolution reduces uncertainty and gives beneficiaries confidence that distributions follow the decedent’s established plan.
Securing judicial confirmation that an asset belongs to a trust limits opportunities for future challenges from interested parties who might later assert conflicting claims. The court’s determination acts as authoritative guidance for institutions and future successors, preserving the integrity of the trust administration. By documenting evidence, presenting witnesses when needed, and obtaining an enforceable order, trustees and beneficiaries reduce the risk that the asset’s status will be questioned again, helping ensure the decedent’s wishes are carried out without prolonged litigation down the road.
Start by locating original trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any signed transfer forms. If a decedent had correspondence indicating an intent to place assets in the trust, preserve those communications. Written evidence and contemporaneous records can be persuasive in court and with institutions. Organize these documents chronologically and make certified copies where possible. Having a complete record helps clarify the decedent’s intentions and supports a petition if informal resolution with banks or county recorders is unsuccessful.
Addressing omitted funding promptly helps avoid complications such as creditor claims, disputes among beneficiaries, and changes in asset values. Prompt attention also preserves evidence and witness recollection, which can be important if a petition becomes contested. Timely decisions help trustees carry out their duties and allow beneficiaries to receive distributions sooner. Taking decisive steps quickly—while coordinating with relevant institutions—reduces uncertainty and keeps the focus on implementing the decedent’s plan in the most efficient manner possible.
Residents of Cobb may need a Heggstad petition when an asset intended for a living trust remains titled otherwise at the time of death. Common scenarios include property still in the decedent’s name, bank accounts not retitled, or transfers that were started but not completed. A petition can preserve the trust’s role in managing and distributing assets, reduce the scope of probate, and provide a legal mechanism to clarify ownership. When the decedent’s intent is evident, pursuing a petition often aligns administration with the original planning goals and reduces the likelihood of later disputes.
Other reasons to consider this service include institutional resistance to retitling, family disagreement over ownership, and concerns about time or cost of a full probate administration. A Heggstad petition can create a focused court proceeding to address a specific missing funding issue rather than opening a broad probate case. For trustees and beneficiaries seeking a practical and enforceable solution that honors the decedent’s plan, filing a petition may be the most effective route to restore intended distributions and to secure a clear path for trust administration.
Typical circumstances include deeds that were prepared but not recorded, bank or brokerage accounts left in the decedent’s name, beneficiary designations that conflict with trust provisions, or retirement accounts that require beneficiary confirmation. Other scenarios involve transfers executed shortly before death without completing recording procedures, or assets held jointly where survivorship is unclear. Any instance where the decedent’s intent to include property in a trust is evident but title does not reflect that intent can result in the need for a Heggstad petition to align administration with the trust.
Real property such as a family home or vacation property that remains recorded in the decedent’s individual name at death is a common candidate for a Heggstad petition. Even if a deed was prepared or a transfer was discussed, failure to record the deed can leave title inconsistent with the trust. A petition can help the court recognize the decedent’s intent and allow the trustee to treat the property as a trust asset for management and distribution, simplifying transactions like sale or transfer by clarifying ownership for third parties and purchasers.
Bank accounts or brokerage accounts intended to be owned by the trust but left in the decedent’s name may cause delays in distribution. Institutions may refuse to transfer funds without clear authority or a court order. A Heggstad petition can establish that the accounts should be considered trust assets, enabling trustees to access funds for administration or distribution. Providing account statements, transfer requests, and supporting declarations can support the petition and help institutions recognize the trust’s claim to those funds.
Retirement accounts present special issues because beneficiary designations govern disposition and may or may not align with trust provisions. When there is ambiguity or conflict between beneficiary designations and trust intentions, a Heggstad petition may be used to clarify how those assets should be treated in light of other estate planning documents. Resolving these matters through appropriate procedures helps ensure retirement assets are administered in accordance with the decedent’s overall plan while addressing any inconsistencies among related documents.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation and guidance for Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters in Cobb and throughout Lake County. We assist clients by evaluating documents, preparing petitions and declarations, coordinating with financial institutions and county recorders, and representing clients at any necessary hearings. Our goal is to provide clear options, realistic timelines, and practical strategies so trustees and beneficiaries can make informed decisions about how best to resolve missing trust funding and move forward with administration and distribution.
Choosing representation that understands probate, trust administration, and petition practice helps ensure that a Heggstad petition is prepared with attention to detail, supporting evidence, and procedural requirements. We focus on gathering relevant documents, drafting persuasive declarations, and presenting a clear case to the court that aligns with the decedent’s intentions. Effective advocacy also involves anticipating potential objections, working with opposing parties when appropriate, and seeking efficient resolutions that preserve estate assets and family relationships whenever possible.
We prioritize practical strategies to minimize delay and expense while protecting the rights and interests of trustees and beneficiaries. That approach includes communicating with institutions to explore non-litigation remedies, preparing court filings when necessary, and ensuring that petitions are supported by credible and organized evidence. By taking a systematic approach to each matter, we aim to reduce the uncertainty and to help clients obtain the legal determinations needed to administer trust assets responsibly and in accordance with the decedent’s plan.
Our office assists clients at every stage, from pre-filing evaluation to post-order implementation. We work with trustees to obtain orders that facilitate title transfers, account access, or other administrative needs and we advise beneficiaries about their rights under the trust. Whether the issue can be resolved with documentation or requires a court declaration, our focus is on providing clear guidance and practical action steps so clients in Cobb and Lake County can proceed with confidence through the trust administration process.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to collect trust documents and related records, followed by a review of the assets in question to determine whether institutional cooperation might resolve the issue without court involvement. If a petition is warranted, we prepare the necessary pleadings, declarations, and exhibits to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property. We then serve interested parties, respond to oppositions, and present the matter to the court with the aim of securing a clear and enforceable order that facilitates trust administration.
The first step is to gather all relevant estate planning documents, titles, account records, and any communications that reflect the decedent’s intent. This includes the trust instrument, pour-over will, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any transfer or funding paperwork. Collecting thorough documentation at the outset enables a realistic assessment of whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed and whether any simpler alternatives exist, such as securing institutional cooperation through a certificate of trust or corrected transfer paperwork.
We review the trust document, pour-over will, powers of attorney, and other related instruments to understand the decedent’s expressed intentions and the trustee’s powers. This review identifies whether the trust’s provisions and pertinent documents support a conclusion that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. It also helps identify potential conflicts or omissions that may require additional evidence or declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent and actions taken during their lifetime.
We collect any evidence of steps taken to fund the trust, such as signed transfer forms, unrecorded deeds, bank correspondence, or statements indicating attempted retitling. Declarations from those with knowledge of the decedent’s planning, as well as documentary evidence showing an intent to transfer, strengthen the case. Properly organizing and documenting these materials helps craft a persuasive petition and reduces the chance of deficiencies that could slow or complicate the court process.
If the evaluation indicates that a Heggstad petition is appropriate, the next step is drafting the petition and supporting declarations, compiling exhibits, and filing with the probate court. The petition sets forth factual assertions and legal grounds for treating the property as trust property and requests a judicial order to that effect. We ensure required notices are prepared and served on all interested persons in accordance with probate rules, and we respond to any initial inquiries from the court or opposing parties to keep the process moving smoothly toward resolution.
The petition is accompanied by declarations from the trustee, beneficiaries, and any witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s actions and intent. We organize exhibits such as the trust instrument, account statements, deeds, and correspondence to present a coherent factual narrative. Careful drafting addresses foreseeable objections and frames the legal question clearly for the court, increasing the likelihood of a favorable disposition without unnecessary delays or supplemental filings.
After filing, we arrange service on all interested persons and any parties identified in probate rules, ensuring compliance with statutory notice requirements. If objections arise, we work to resolve disputes through negotiated stipulations when possible or prepare responsive pleadings and declarations for hearing. Our goal is to limit contested litigation while protecting client interests, and we pursue settlement when appropriate but remain prepared to present the matter to the court for a definitive ruling when necessary.
Following hearings or negotiation, the court will issue an order resolving whether the asset is to be treated as trust property. If the court grants the petition, we assist with implementing the order by preparing documents to convey title, coordinating with banks or recorders, and updating trust records to reflect the court’s determination. We also advise trustees on how to proceed with administration and distribution consistent with the trust terms and the court’s order, helping ensure the property is handled properly and efficiently.
Once the court issues an order, it serves as authoritative guidance for third parties and provides the legal basis to retitle property, access accounts, or complete transactions. We prepare any necessary transfer documents or certifications required by institutions and assist in recording deeds or updating account registrations as needed. The court order reduces the risk that institutions will resist transfer and helps ensure that trustees can carry out their duties without further legal obstacles.
With title clarified and assets treated as trust property, trustees can proceed to administer and distribute assets according to the trust’s terms. We advise on distribution mechanics, tax considerations, and record-keeping to ensure compliance with fiduciary duties. Providing clear documentation of the court order and updated trust records helps prevent future disputes and supports orderly administration so beneficiaries receive their distributions in a timely and lawful manner.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as trust property, often because the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust but formal transfer steps were not completed before death. The petition presents evidence of intent, such as the trust instrument, deeds, account records, and declarations from witnesses, and seeks an order that aligns administration with the trust’s terms rather than treating the asset as part of a probate estate. This remedy addresses situations where title and intent are out of alignment and a focused judicial determination is needed. When a petition is appropriate depends on the facts. If institutions will not retitle assets without a court order, or if the parties disagree about ownership, a Heggstad petition can be a practical and focused alternative to opening a larger probate administration. The petition specifically targets the asset in question and asks the court to treat it as trust property, thereby helping trustees and beneficiaries proceed with distribution without having to process the entire estate through probate for that item.
The time required to resolve a Heggstad petition varies with each case and depends on factors such as the complexity of title issues, the responsiveness of involved institutions, and whether any interested persons object. A straightforward petition with cooperative parties and clear documentation may be resolved more quickly, while contested matters requiring hearings and additional evidence can take several months or longer. Court schedules and procedural timelines also influence how long the matter remains pending. Early preparation and thorough documentation can shorten the process where possible. By assembling clear deeds, account statements, and witness declarations, and by attempting institutional resolution before filing, parties can reduce delays. When disputes arise, mediation or negotiated stipulations can speed resolution, but if hearings are needed, the calendar and briefing requirements will determine the timetable for a final court order.
Evidence to support a Heggstad petition commonly includes the trust document, deeds or transfer forms, account records, correspondence indicating the decedent’s intent, and declarations from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s plans and actions. A recorded deed, signed but not recorded transfer document, or evidence that a transfer was initiated but not completed can be persuasive. Documents showing the decedent’s consistent planning and intent to fund the trust strengthen the petition’s factual foundation. In addition to documentary evidence, courts consider witness testimony or declarations about actions the decedent took to fund the trust, conversations reflecting intent, and any contemporaneous records. The more direct and consistent the evidence regarding the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust, the more likely the court will be to grant the requested relief. Organizing and authenticating records carefully is important to present a coherent case.
A Heggstad petition is focused on specific assets that were intended to be part of a trust but were not properly transferred before death. It is not a substitute for probate that resolves every item in an estate. While a successful petition can avoid probate for the particular asset at issue by having it treated as trust property, other assets that were not part of the trust or that lack adequate evidence of intent may still require probate administration. The petition is a targeted remedy rather than a wholesale avoidance of probate for all estate matters. If multiple assets remain outside the trust and meet the factual threshold, separate petitions or other legal actions may be necessary. In some cases, a petition can resolve several items if the evidence supports that all were intended for the trust. It is important to evaluate each asset individually and to consider whether broader probate administration is required to address creditor claims, tax issues, or assets not addressed by trust documents.
In California, trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested persons with standing under probate law can file a Heggstad petition to ask the court to treat property as trust property. Trustees often bring petitions to clarify title and enable administration, while beneficiaries may seek resolution when an asset intended for the trust remains outside it. The filing must comply with statutory notice and service requirements so that all persons with potential interest in the property receive appropriate notice and an opportunity to respond. Identifying interested persons and providing proper notice are important procedural steps. Failure to serve required parties or to comply with court rules can result in delays or issues that delay a final determination. Careful preparation and adherence to service requirements help ensure the court can proceed to evaluate the petition on its merits.
A Heggstad petition can be effective in resolving issues with financial institutions when those institutions require a court order to retitle accounts or release funds. Many banks and brokerage firms will request a certified court order before making changes to account registration or releasing assets, especially if account ownership is disputed or documentation is incomplete. A judicial declaration that treats the asset as trust property provides institutions with the authority they need to comply with transfers and disbursements. However, institutional response varies and some entities may have additional requirements even after a court order, such as specific forms or additional documentation. Working with institutions in parallel with filing the petition can sometimes minimize the burden, but when institutions remain unwilling, the court order typically provides the most reliable path to obtaining compliance and facilitating the necessary retitling or access to assets.
If family members contest a Heggstad petition, the matter can become contested litigation requiring hearings, additional evidence, and possibly discovery. Courts will evaluate the competing claims and weigh the evidence of intent, title, and the circumstances surrounding the asset’s funding. Parties may seek settlement or resolution through negotiated agreements, but if differences persist, the court will make a determination based on applicable law and the evidence presented at hearing. Contested proceedings can extend the timeline and increase costs, so early efforts to document intent, communicate with potential objectors, and consider mediation are often productive. Clear, well-organized evidence and a reasoned presentation to the court increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution even in the face of opposition, while preserving the interests of trustees and beneficiaries throughout the process.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include seeking voluntary cooperation from financial institutions, recording corrective deeds when appropriate, using a certificate of trust, or obtaining a short-form order that some institutions accept. In some cases, a pour-over will or other testamentary instrument can move property into a trust after probate, though that may involve a probate administration for those assets. Informal solutions work best when all interested parties agree and institutions are willing to cooperate based on the documentation provided. When institutions refuse to act or when parties disagree, an alternative might be mediation or negotiating a stipulated court order without a contested hearing. However, when title issues are complex or when third parties decline to retitle without a judicial determination, a Heggstad petition provides a reliable path to obtain the legal authority necessary to clear title and proceed with trust administration.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the title issues, the amount of evidence that must be gathered, whether disputes arise, and court filing fees. A straightforward petition with cooperative parties and clear documentation may result in lower costs, while contested matters requiring hearings, discovery, or additional filings can increase expenses. Court costs and filing fees are only part of the total expense; preparation of declarations, document gathering, and professional time also factor into overall costs. Discussing potential fee structures and cost estimates with counsel at the outset helps set expectations. In many matters, careful preparation reduces surprise costs by identifying necessary documentation early, exploring non-litigation remedies, and limiting contested proceedings through negotiation or stipulation when possible. Transparent communication about likely expenses helps clients plan and make informed decisions about pursuing a petition.
For an initial consultation about a Heggstad petition, bring copies of the trust document, any wills or pour-over wills, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any paperwork that shows attempted transfer or retitling. If there are communications that indicate the decedent’s intent to place assets in the trust, include those as well. Providing a comprehensive set of documents at the start allows a thorough assessment of whether a petition is appropriate and what evidence will be needed. Also bring contact information for institutions holding the assets, dates of any attempted transfers, and the names and addresses of potential interested persons such as heirs or beneficiaries. Having those details available helps counsel evaluate notice requirements, potential objections, and the procedural steps needed to pursue informal resolution or to prepare a petition if necessary.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas