A trust modification petition can be necessary when circumstances have changed since a trust was created or when the original trust document contains ambiguities or errors that affect administration. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in Lucerne and Lake County with clear, practical guidance about whether a petition to the court is the appropriate path. The process often begins with a careful review of the trust, related documents, and the parties involved. We help people understand the potential outcomes, the need for notice to interested persons, and how a petition can restore alignment between the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intentions.
Trust modification petitions differ from simple amendments in that they may require judicial review when parties do not agree or when legal obstacles prevent a private change. Common estate planning documents we review during an assessment include a revocable living trust, pour-over will, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, certification of trust, and similar records that inform the court about the settlor’s intent. Preparing a strong petition involves documenting the facts that support modification, clarifying beneficiary interests, and proposing precise language for the requested change so the court can enter an effective order.
Modifying a trust through a petition can preserve the trustmaker’s intentions while addressing unforeseen circumstances, administrative problems, or drafting errors. When handled appropriately, a court-approved modification brings legal clarity that reduces disputes among beneficiaries and can improve asset management under a trustee. A successful petition can restore the intended distribution scheme, correct technical defects, and allow the trust to function as intended without reopening the entire estate. For families in Lucerne, a well-prepared petition can prevent delays and limit ongoing friction, helping settle matters efficiently while respecting the trustmaker’s wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout San Jose, Lake County, and nearby Northern California communities with focused estate planning services. Our practice assists individuals and families with trust creation, trust administration, and petitions to modify trust terms when necessary. We prioritize clear communication, careful document review, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s unique circumstances. When a trust modification petition is appropriate, we prepare the required pleadings, coordinate notice to interested parties, and present the factual record to the court so that the process moves forward in an orderly and predictable way.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court asking to change the terms or administration of a trust when private amendment is not possible or when an issue requires judicial resolution. California law allows for a range of remedies, including petitions to reform the trust to match the settlor’s intent, petitions to correct mistakes, and petitions that request specific orders regarding trustee powers or distributions. The petitioner must typically show facts supporting the change, provide notice to beneficiaries, and explain why the requested modification is consistent with the trustmaker’s objectives or necessary due to changed circumstances.
Not every disagreement or change requires court involvement. When the settlor is available and willing, a trust can often be amended directly. A petition becomes necessary when the settlor is unavailable, deceased, incapacitated, or when beneficiaries or trustees cannot agree about an interpretation or change. The court evaluates evidence such as the trust document, related estate documents, correspondence, and the practical effects of the requested modification. The process includes filing, service, possible negotiations or mediations, and ultimately a court hearing where a judge may approve, deny, or modify the requested relief.
A trust modification petition is a pleading that asks the probate or superior court to enter an order changing the trust’s terms, clarifying ambiguous language, or resolving disputes about administration. The petition identifies the trust, states the reasons for the requested change, and attaches supporting documents and proposed orders. Petitioners must provide notice to interested persons so that beneficiaries and other parties have an opportunity to respond. The court then reviews evidence and legal arguments before deciding whether the requested modification serves justice and the trustmaker’s expressed or reasonably inferred intent.
Key elements of the process include a thorough document review, drafting a clear petition that outlines the requested relief, compiling supporting evidence, preparing a proposed order, and serving notice to all interested persons. Procedural steps also include filing the petition with the correct court, responding to any objections, and attending hearings if necessary. Gathering witness statements, certifications of trust, and financial records helps the court understand the practical effects of the change. Effective preparation anticipates likely objections and frames the request in terms of fidelity to the trustmaker’s intent and the interests of beneficiaries.
Understanding terminology helps demystify the modification process and makes it easier to follow procedural steps. Key terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, notice, and modification order, each of which plays a distinct role in the courtroom and trust administration. Knowing these definitions clarifies who must be notified, who may object, and what kind of evidence the court will consider. For people in Lucerne and Lake County, this familiarity supports informed decisions and smoother interaction with counsel and the court during a petition seeking to update or correct a trust.
The settlor, sometimes called the trustmaker, is the person who created the trust and set out its terms. The settlor’s intent is the principal guide for how the court interprets trust language when presenting a modification petition. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include the original trust document, prior versions of the trust, related estate planning instruments, letters, or communications indicating the settlor’s wishes. When the settlor is alive but incapacitated or has passed away, a petition may be needed to resolve ambiguity or to permit changes that reflect the settlor’s true intentions.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits, distributions, or other rights under the trust. Beneficiaries have legal interests that the court considers when a petition seeks to change how a trust operates or distributes assets. Notice to beneficiaries is a fundamental requirement so they can object or participate. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, and organizations named in the trust. Their views on the proposed modification can affect the court’s decision and may lead to settlement discussions or litigation if disagreements arise.
The trustee is the person or institution charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. The trustee’s duties include administering assets prudently, keeping records, making distributions according to the trust, and sometimes responding to or defending modification petitions. When a trustee is uncertain about how to proceed or when a proposed change would affect fiduciary duties, a petition may ask the court for direction. The trustee’s cooperation or opposition can influence the shape and speed of the modification process.
Notice of petition refers to the formal process of informing interested persons that a petition has been filed; it explains the requested relief and the time frame for responses. A modification order is the court’s written decision that approves, denies, or refines the requested changes to the trust and becomes part of the legal record. The notice ensures due process by giving beneficiaries a chance to object, while the modification order provides legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries going forward. Both documents are essential for an enforceable and transparent resolution.
When contemplating a change to a trust, several legal avenues may be available including direct amendment by the settlor, beneficiary agreements, trust restatement, decanting, or a court petition. Simple edits and mutual agreements can be efficient when parties concur and the settlor is able to sign. Decanting transfers assets to a new trust with different terms and may be used in limited circumstances. A petition to the court is the appropriate option when parties disagree, the settlor is unavailable, or when formal correction is needed. Assessing pros and cons helps determine the least disruptive path that achieves the intended result.
If the settlor is available and able to act, a simple amendment or restatement may resolve minor drafting errors or update beneficiary designations without court involvement. When the settlor clearly agrees to the change and the modification does not affect third-party rights or create ambiguity, handling the change privately can save time and expense. It remains important to document the amendment properly and to update related estate planning documents, such as powers of attorney and healthcare directives, to ensure consistency across the estate plan and to reduce the risk of future disputes among beneficiaries.
A collective agreement among all beneficiaries to a proposed change may permit a nonjudicial resolution in some cases. When beneficiaries have full information and provide written consent, and the trust instrument or applicable law allows for private adjustments, the parties can often avoid the time and complexity of court proceedings. Even where agreement exists, it is important to create clear written documentation, update trust records, and ensure that the change is executed in a way that legally bindingly reflects the consensus of interested persons to minimize later challenges.
When the trust contains ambiguous language, conflicting provisions, or multiple documents that point to different intentions, a judicial petition often provides the needed clarity. Courts can interpret terms, reconcile inconsistencies, and issue orders that guide trustees and beneficiaries. In contested situations where parties assert different interpretations or rights, relying on a comprehensive legal process helps ensure that the resolution is durable and defensible. A judge’s decision can also set a clear path for administration that reduces the likelihood of repeated disputes over the same issue.
Significant life changes, such as remarriage, death of a beneficiary, or substantial changes in assets, can make existing trust provisions impractical or unfair. Drafting mistakes, omitted clauses, or unclear provisions may require court action to correct technical defects or to effectuate the settlor’s original intent. A petition can seek reformation, clarification, or other relief tailored to resolve the practical problem while honoring the foundational purposes of the trust. This approach provides a formal record and legal authority for the recommended change.
Pursuing a comprehensive court-based approach can deliver lasting legal certainty by producing a judicial order that governs trust administration going forward. This pathway addresses objections, documents the factual record supporting the change, and reduces ambiguity that might otherwise invite further litigation. It is particularly valuable when beneficiaries have competing interests, when there are allegations of mistake or fraud, or when the trustmaker’s intent is not easily proven through existing documents. The resulting order provides clear instructions to trustees and reduces future administrative risk.
In addition to clarity, a court-approved modification can secure resolution of contentious issues and provide a publicly enforceable directive for trustees and fiduciaries. The process encourages careful fact gathering and legal analysis, which helps the court craft an order that is practical and enforceable. For trustees, following a court order minimizes exposure to liability for distributions or administrative decisions. For beneficiaries, it creates a predictable framework for distributions and ongoing administration that mitigates uncertainty and dispute.
A court order resolving a modification petition gives parties a definitive ruling that guides how the trust will operate going forward. By establishing legal clarity, the order reduces the risk of conflicting interpretations and repeated challenges. This finality is important for trustees responsible for managing and distributing assets, because it reduces the likelihood of exposure to claims based on competing understandings of the trust document. For families, the certainty brought by a judicial resolution promotes smoother administration and helps preserve relationships that might otherwise be strained by ongoing disagreement.
When the court issues an order that approves a modification after proper notice and hearing, the remedy is generally more resistant to later attack because it rests on a considered judicial determination. That reduces the potential for subsequent litigation over the same issue. A properly documented proceeding that resolves conflicts and records the rationale for the change also supports fiduciary decisions and helps ensure that assets are distributed according to the resolved terms. For many clients, this stability is the primary advantage of seeking judicial approval.
Begin by assembling all trust-related documents including the revocable living trust, prior trust drafts, pour-over will, financial power of attorney, advance health care directive, certification of trust, and any letters or communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. Also collect records of asset ownership, account statements, and documentation of any transactions that bear on the trust’s administration. Having a complete file speeds review, helps identify inconsistencies or errors, and strengthens any petition by providing the factual support the court will expect. Organized records also ease notice and service requirements.
When a modification petition is based on changed circumstances, omissions, or mistakes, gather contemporaneous evidence that demonstrates the need for change. This may include medical records, financial statements, correspondence, or affidavits from individuals familiar with the settlor’s intent. Clear evidence helps the court understand why an amendment or reformation better reflects reality and the settlor’s wishes. Presenting a well-documented factual record from the outset improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and reduces opportunities for misunderstanding or later challenge.
Consider a modification petition if the trust contains errors that alter the settlor’s intended distributions, if beneficiaries disagree about interpretation, or if unforeseen life events make existing terms impractical. Other reasons include correcting typographical or drafting mistakes, addressing outdated trustee powers, or obtaining judicial clarification that protects trustees from liability. A petition may also be necessary when assets have been omitted from a trust or when a uniform legal remedy is needed to resolve a multi-party dispute so that administration can proceed without ongoing uncertainty or obstruction.
Many clients also pursue petitions to adapt trusts to significant financial developments, changes in family structure, or to correct technical defects uncovered during trust administration. Where informal amendment is not possible, where consent cannot be achieved, or where legal ambiguities threaten the orderly distribution of assets, a petition provides a controlled process to obtain a court order that clarifies obligations and rights. For families in Lucerne and Lake County, this formal route can prevent prolonged conflict and provide a clear framework for future administration.
Common situations include beneficiary disputes over meaning or distribution, discovery of drafting errors or omissions, substantial changes in the settlor’s assets, and instances where the trustee needs court direction to act. Other triggers include changes in tax law, the death or incapacity of a beneficiary or trustee, or newly discovered evidence showing that the trust language does not reflect the settlor’s intent. Recognizing these circumstances early allows for timely intervention and the preparation of a focused petition that addresses the court’s likely concerns.
Disagreements among beneficiaries about distribution intent or trustee actions commonly lead to petitions seeking clarification or modification. When parties read trust provisions differently or assert competing rights, the trustee may seek court guidance or a beneficiary may file to resolve the conflict. Courts consider the trust language, surrounding circumstances, and evidence of intent to determine the appropriate result. Resolving such disputes through a petition creates a clear, enforceable order that supports consistent administration and reduces the risk of repeated litigation among heirs.
Drafting mistakes, missing clauses, or ambiguous language discovered during administration often require correction through formal proceedings. A petition can request reformation or clarification to align the instrument with the settlor’s intended meaning. Evidence such as prior drafts, letters, and testimony may be used to show the original intent and to support the requested change. Addressing these defects through the court helps ensure that the trust functions as intended and that trustees can act without fear of personal liability for following the clarified terms.
Major events like remarriage, divorce, death of a beneficiary, sudden changes in asset composition, or unforeseen tax implications can render original trust terms impractical. When such events occur, a petition may be appropriate to update distributions, adjust fiduciary powers, or accommodate new family realities. Demonstrating the changed circumstances to the court and proposing a narrowly tailored modification often produces an outcome that honors the settlor’s broader goals while adapting to current conditions, allowing for efficient and fair administration going forward.
We assist clients in Lucerne and throughout Lake County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning needs. From the initial review of a revocable living trust and related documents to filing a petition and presenting the case in court, the practice provides attentive support and clear guidance. If you have questions about whether a modification petition is appropriate, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and available options. We aim to help local families resolve trust issues efficiently and thoughtfully.
Clients choose our firm because we focus on practical solutions that are responsive to each family’s needs. We thoroughly review trust documents, related estate planning records, and the factual circumstances that give rise to the requested modification. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful preparation of court materials, and realistic guidance about likely outcomes. We work to identify the least disruptive path to resolve disputes or to implement necessary changes while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries alike.
When a petition is necessary, we prepare the pleadings and supporting evidence with attention to detail, ensure proper notice to interested persons, and advocate for outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent and practical considerations for administration. We also explore alternatives to court when appropriate, such as negotiation or mediation, while always keeping clients informed about procedural requirements and timelines. For families in Lucerne, our local focus enables us to manage filings and hearings efficiently in regional courts.
Throughout the process we emphasize transparency and responsiveness, explaining legal options in plain terms and preparing clients for the likely stages of a petition. Whether the matter can be resolved by agreement or requires a contested hearing, our service aims to secure a resolution that provides clarity for trustees, protection for beneficiaries, and a stable framework for future trust administration. To discuss a potential petition, call 408-528-2827 and we will schedule a time to review the relevant documents and next steps.
Our process begins with a comprehensive intake and document review to understand the trust, related estate planning instruments, and each party’s position. We then advise on whether a nonjudicial solution is feasible or whether a petition is recommended. If filing is appropriate, we prepare the petition, assemble supporting evidence, and file with the correct court. We coordinate service and responses, engage in settlement discussions where possible, and represent clients at hearings. The goal is to achieve a clear, enforceable resolution that supports efficient administration of the trust.
The first step is a careful review of the trust and related documents to identify the issues and evidence supporting modification. This assessment includes evaluating prior drafts, related estate planning documents, account records, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. We determine who must be notified, whether a petition is necessary, and what relief should be requested. A thorough initial assessment sets expectations for timing, possible outcomes, and the likely need for witness testimony or additional documentary evidence.
Collecting complete records is essential. This means gathering the trust document, pour-over will, powers of attorney, advance health care directive, certification of trust, and any drafts or correspondence. We analyze these materials to identify inconsistencies, gaps, or evidence supporting the requested modification. Financial records and asset inventories are also reviewed to ensure proposed changes are practical and reflect current holdings. A well-documented file increases efficiency and strengthens the petition before filing.
Identifying all interested persons, including beneficiaries, trustees, and potential creditors, is a critical early step. We map each stakeholder’s likely position, assess potential objections, and evaluate opportunities for resolution without court intervention. Understanding stakeholder interests helps shape the petition’s requests and supporting evidence. Early positioning also guides settlement discussions and can reduce the time and expense of contested proceedings if agreement can be reached on key issues.
If a petition is warranted, we prepare the required pleadings, compile exhibits, and file with the appropriate court in the county with jurisdiction. Proper service of the petition on all interested persons is essential to meet due process requirements. We also prepare proposed orders and declarations that explain the factual basis for the requested relief. Timely and accurate service allows affected parties to assess their positions, respond, and engage in potential settlement discussions before any contested hearing.
Drafting the petition requires a clear statement of the requested relief and a well-organized presentation of supporting evidence, such as the trust document, relevant account statements, witness declarations, and any prior drafts or communications. A proposed order that precisely describes the requested change helps the court and opposing parties understand the practical effect. Attention to evidentiary detail and legal argument increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome or a settlement that achieves the intended result.
Serving the petition on beneficiaries and other interested persons ensures they have notice and the opportunity to respond. Service protocols and timelines must be followed closely to avoid procedural defects. We coordinate service, prepare proof of service documents, and track responses. Early engagement with recipients can sometimes uncover information that aids resolution, and an orderly service process positions the petitioner to proceed to a hearing if necessary without facing avoidable technical challenges.
Court proceedings may include hearings, briefing, and evidentiary submissions. Parties may reach a negotiated resolution at any stage, or the court may hold hearings to evaluate the petition and objections. When the court issues an order, we ensure the order is properly implemented, that trustee actions comply with the terms, and that any formal trust documents are updated or recorded if required. The final step is to confirm that administration proceeds in accordance with the order to provide long-term stability for beneficiaries and trustees.
At hearings the court considers the petition, testimonial evidence, documentary exhibits, and legal arguments from all sides. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present the factual narrative showing why the requested modification is justified. The goal is to demonstrate a coherent, document-supported case that aligns with the settlor’s intent or demonstrates the necessity of change. Clear presentation and focused evidence help the judge reach a reasoned decision that resolves the dispute and authorizes appropriate relief.
After the court issues its decision, we assist in implementing the order by updating trust records, advising trustees on required actions, and preparing amended trust documents or certification updates as needed. Ensuring compliance with the order helps avoid future challenges and provides a clear path for ongoing administration. We also advise beneficiaries about the effect of the order on distributions and trustee responsibilities so that the trust can be managed with confidence and according to the court’s directive.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a judge to change, interpret, or reform the terms of a trust when private amendment is not possible or when disputes or legal defects prevent a straightforward administrative solution. The petition explains the requested change, attaches the trust and supporting documents, and describes the factual basis for the modification. The petitioner also serves notice on interested persons so beneficiaries and trustees have an opportunity to respond before the court acts. The court then evaluates evidence and decides whether to grant the requested relief. The petition process may address various issues such as correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous provisions, adjusting trustee powers, or resolving conflicts among beneficiaries. A judge’s order adds legal certainty and can help trustees act confidently in accordance with the court’s direction. The specifics vary by case and depend on the facts, the trust language, and the applicable provisions of California law, so early document review and careful preparation are important.
The time required for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, whether parties agree, and court schedules. Simple matters that proceed without contest may be resolved more quickly, while contested petitions involving numerous parties, extensive evidence, or multiple hearings typically take longer. Administrative tasks like gathering documents, serving notice, and meeting court filing deadlines also contribute to the overall timeline. Local court availability and any required continuances can affect how long the matter remains pending. Preparing a thorough petition and attempting early settlement discussions can shorten the process, but contested matters may extend over months. Clients should expect an initial assessment to provide a realistic timeline based on the precise facts, the number of interested persons, and whether the case can be resolved by agreement or requires a full evidentiary hearing in probate court.
Yes, a trust can often be modified after the settlor dies in certain circumstances. When the settlor is deceased, statutes and case law allow parties to petition the court for reformation or clarification if the trust document does not accurately reflect the settlor’s intent or contains mistakes that frustrate administration. The court will review evidence such as prior drafts, communications, or other indications of intent to determine whether the requested change is warranted and consistent with the settlor’s goals. Post-death petitions can be sensitive because beneficiaries’ rights are fixed in many cases, so courts are careful to protect those interests. The specific remedy depends on the facts and legal standards, and a well-prepared petition focused on documentary evidence and coherent factual narrative increases the chance of a favorable outcome while respecting legal protections for beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries disagree with a proposed modification, the matter may proceed to contested proceedings where each party presents evidence and legal arguments. Before that stage, counsel often explores negotiation or mediation to find a mutually acceptable resolution. A negotiated settlement can avoid the time and expense of a contested hearing and produce a practical arrangement for the trust’s administration. If agreement cannot be reached, the court will evaluate the competing positions and issue an appropriate ruling after considering the trust document, evidence of intent, and the effect on beneficiaries. The court process ensures that all interested persons have notice and an opportunity to be heard. Preparing clear evidence, anticipating objections, and demonstrating how the modification aligns with the trustmaker’s intent or resolves practical problems improves the prospects for a resolution that holds up under judicial review and reduces the likelihood of repeated litigation.
Yes, providing notice to beneficiaries and other interested persons is a fundamental part of the modification petition process. California rules generally require that interested persons be informed of the petition and given an opportunity to respond or object. Proper service of the petition helps ensure due process and avoids procedural defects that could delay the case or invalidate an order. The identities and addresses of interested persons should be compiled early so that service can be completed correctly and proofs of service can be filed with the court. Failing to notify interested persons can lead to challenges or reversal of a court order, so attention to detail in the service process is essential. If there are unknown or hard-to-locate beneficiaries, special procedures may be necessary to provide constructive notice, and the court can advise on acceptable methods to proceed in those circumstances.
Modifying a trust may have tax or public benefit implications depending on the substance of the change and the settlor’s or beneficiaries’ financial circumstances. Changes that affect ownership, distribution timing, or beneficiary designations can sometimes alter estate, gift, or income tax consequences. Similarly, adjustments that change income distributions or asset ownership could affect means-tested public benefits for certain beneficiaries. It is important to identify these risks early and, where necessary, coordinate with tax or benefits advisors to evaluate potential consequences before finalizing the modification. When tax or benefit impacts are possible, the petition and proposed order can be drafted to minimize unwanted consequences, or the parties may consider alternative solutions. Full disclosure and careful planning reduce the risk of unintended financial or eligibility outcomes that would complicate administration after the modification is implemented.
The cost of filing a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the matter, court filing fees, the need for documentary and witness preparation, and whether the case is contested. Simple petitions with few interested parties and minimal factual dispute will generally incur lower fees. Contested proceedings that require extensive evidence, expert reports, or multiple hearings will increase costs. The required court filing fees and potential costs for service, copies, and document production should also be considered when estimating the total expense. We provide an initial assessment to outline likely steps and anticipated costs based on the facts presented. Exploring settlement options early in the process often reduces overall expense. Clients should weigh the benefits of judicial resolution against the expected costs and time, and we help identify pathways that balance effectiveness with practical budgeting considerations.
Support for a modification petition typically includes the trust document and any prior drafts, related estate planning instruments, account statements showing assets, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, and witness declarations or affidavits. Medical records, financial records, and other contemporaneous documentation that explains changed circumstances or demonstrates a mistake in drafting can be critical. The strength of the petition often depends on the quality and relevance of the documentary record and credible witness accounts that corroborate the requested modification. Compiling a coherent evidentiary package improves the court’s ability to evaluate the request and reduces the likelihood of prolonged disputes. Early identification of the most persuasive documents and witness statements allows focused preparation and a clearer presentation of the reasons supporting the proposed change.
A trustee may have authority under the trust instrument or state law to take certain actions that effectively alter administration without court involvement, such as exercising discretionary powers or decanting assets into a new trust in jurisdictions and circumstances that allow it. However, unilateral trustee action to modify trust terms that affect beneficiaries’ vested rights can expose the trustee to liability if the action exceeds granted powers. When trustee authority is unclear or a proposed change would significantly affect beneficiary rights, seeking court approval provides protection and clarity for the trustee and beneficiaries alike. If the trustee believes modification without judicial involvement is appropriate, documenting the legal basis and notifying interested persons is important. Consulting about whether a court petition is advisable helps determine the safest path forward and prevents unnecessary exposure to claims against the trustee for unauthorized action.
A Heggstad petition addresses situations where assets were transferred to a trust after the trustmaker’s death in a manner that raises questions about whether those assets were intended to be part of the trust. The petition asks the court to determine whether a particular transfer should be treated as trust property for administration and distribution purposes. Heggstad petitions often arise when a decedent’s assets were never formally re-titled or where there is ambiguity about whether assets were meant to fund the trust, making the petition a useful tool in trust administration disputes. While a Heggstad petition is distinct from a petition that modifies trust terms, both seek judicial resolution of issues related to trust administration. A Heggstad petition can be part of a broader trust proceeding if the ownership status of assets affects the relief requested in a modification petition. Clear evidence about transfers, the settlor’s intent, and the timing of transactions is important in these matters.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas