A Heggstad petition can resolve a common probate issue when assets intended to pass by trust instead remain in the decedent’s individual name. If you live in Soda Bay or elsewhere in Lake County, California, and are dealing with an estate where a trust was intended to own certain property but the title was never transferred, a Heggstad petition may be the path to clear title and carry out the decedent’s plan. This page explains when a petition is appropriate, how the process works in state court, and what documents and evidence are typically needed to establish that the trust was intended to own the property at the decedent’s death.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process can save time, avoid unnecessary estate administration, and preserve the settlor’s intent to have a trust manage assets outside probate. In many situations a properly supported petition allows a successor trustee to demonstrate to a probate court that the decedent intended the trust to hold the property, even though formal transfer paperwork was not completed. This guide outlines practical steps, typical timelines under California law, and how the firm representing you approaches documentation, witness testimony, and court filings to pursue confirmation of trust ownership with care and attention to detail.
A Heggstad petition is important because it can effectuate a decedent’s estate plan without requiring a full probate administration for assets that were intended to be held in trust. The benefits include conserving estate resources, achieving the settlor’s goals for asset distribution, and clarifying title for real property and other assets. When successful, a petition resolves ownership questions and allows trustees or beneficiaries to move forward with management, sale, or distribution. Courts will consider documentary evidence, credible testimony, and the overall circumstances showing that the trust was intended to hold the property, which is why careful preparation and accurate records are central to a positive outcome.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in San Jose, Soda Bay, and across California with a focus on estate planning and trust-related matters. Our practice assists clients with petitions to confirm trust ownership, trust administration issues, and related court proceedings. We emphasize clear communication, thorough documentation gathering, and strategic case presentation to support a petition under California Probate Code. Whether you are a trustee, beneficiary, or family member seeking clarity on trust property, we provide grounded guidance on preparing declarations, assembling records, and presenting the factual narrative the court needs to find the property belonged to the trust.
A Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to confirm that property belonged to a trust even though formal transfer procedures were not completed before the settlor’s death. In California courts the petition typically includes declarations from the trustee and witnesses, copies of the trust and settlement documents, and evidence of the settlor’s intent to place the asset in trust. The goal is to obtain a court order recognizing trust ownership, allowing the trustee to administer the property according to the trust terms without further probate complications. Preparing a persuasive petition involves organizing records, witness statements, and legal authority to support your claim.
The process begins with an evaluation of title records, trust documents, and any communications or actions that show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. If the evidence is sufficient, a petition is drafted and filed in the appropriate probate court. The court may schedule a hearing and require notice to interested parties. At the hearing the factual record and legal arguments are presented. If the court grants the petition, an order is entered confirming that the property belongs to the trust, resolving title issues and enabling trust administration to proceed. Timely documentation and transparent communication with interested parties reduce the chance of objections and delays.
A Heggstad petition is named after a California case that established a remedy for situations in which a deceased person intended to transfer property to a trust but failed to complete the transfer. The petition asks the probate court to recognize the settlor’s intent and adjudicate that the asset should be treated as trust property. Courts review the trust document, title records, contemporaneous actions, and testimony to determine intent. Where sufficient proof exists, the court issues an order declaring the asset part of the trust. This remedy helps avoid unnecessary probate and carries out the settlor’s estate planning objectives when administrative technicalities otherwise threaten those goals.
Preparing a persuasive Heggstad petition requires assembling certain core elements: the trust agreement, declarations from the trustee and witnesses recounting the settlor’s intent, evidence of any attempts to transfer title, and title or asset records. The petition must also identify interested parties and provide proper notice under California law. The filing will include a memorandum of points and authorities explaining legal standards and case law supporting a finding of constructive transfer to the trust. Attention to procedural requirements, witness credibility, and corroborating documents strengthens the likelihood the court will grant the relief requested.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions can help you follow the process and communicate more effectively with your attorney and the court. Terms you may encounter include settlor, trustee, successor trustee, declaration, probate court, title vesting, and constructive trust. A working knowledge of these terms clarifies the roles of parties, the types of evidence courts weigh, and the procedural steps needed to obtain an order confirming trust ownership. Clear definitions reduce confusion and make it easier to prepare the necessary documents and witness statements for a successful petition.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it or intended to do so. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the settlor’s intent is central because the petition seeks to demonstrate that the settlor intended for particular property to be trust property despite a failure to complete the formal transfer. Evidence of intent can include the trust document, written correspondence, trust funding steps taken before death, or credible witness testimony. Establishing what the settlor intended is a key factual inquiry in the court’s decision-making process.
Trustee denotes the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets according to the trust terms. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee often seeks judicial recognition that certain assets are trust property so they can administer those assets without a probate estate proceeding. The trustee’s declaration, knowledge of trust terms, and actions taken to administer or claim the property are important pieces of evidence. The trustee also has a duty to provide notice to beneficiaries and interested parties and to act in accordance with the trust’s distribution provisions once title issues are resolved.
Probate court is the judicial body that oversees matters related to wills, trusts, estate administration, and related petitions in California. A Heggstad petition is filed in probate court because it involves resolving ownership and distribution questions that affect estate administration and trust administration. The probate court reviews evidence and applies relevant statutes and case law to determine whether trust ownership should be confirmed. Procedural rules such as notice requirements and filing practices must be followed to ensure the court will consider the petition on its merits and issue an enforceable order.
Title vesting refers to how legal ownership of property is recorded on public documents such as deeds, account records, or titles. A Heggstad petition commonly addresses situations where the title remains in the decedent’s individual name despite the settlor’s intent to have the trust own the property. The court examines title records alongside trust documents and other evidence to determine whether the property should be considered trust property. Correcting title vesting through a court order allows trustees or beneficiaries to transfer, manage, or distribute the asset according to the trust terms.
When confronting assets that were intended to be in trust but are still titled in a decedent’s name, property owners and beneficiaries generally face a choice between pursuing a Heggstad petition or proceeding through formal probate. A Heggstad petition aims to have a court confirm that the asset belongs to the trust, potentially avoiding full probate for that property. Probate, by contrast, is a broader court-supervised process for administering assets titled in the decedent’s name. Evaluating the complexity of the estate, the strength of supporting evidence, and the goals of beneficiaries guides which approach is most appropriate for a particular situation.
A limited court approach such as a Heggstad petition is often sufficient when there is clear documentary evidence that the decedent intended the property to be held in trust. Documents that can support this include the trust agreement itself, deeds showing attempted transfer, beneficiary designations, and correspondence reflecting the settlor’s plan. When these materials demonstrate the transfer intention and there are no conflicting claims by other parties, filing a petition focused on confirming trust ownership can be an efficient and targeted way to resolve the title question without subjecting the entire estate to probate administration.
A limited approach can succeed when interested parties agree or raise minimal objections, allowing the court to rule on title without extended litigation. If beneficiaries and heirs understand the settlor’s plan and are willing to accept a court order recognizing trust ownership, the process is typically more streamlined. Cooperation can reduce litigation costs, shorten timelines, and simplify the evidence the court must consider. Clear communication and properly served notice to interested parties are essential so that the court can enter an order with confidence that the parties had the opportunity to be heard.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary if title issues are complex, documents are ambiguous, or multiple parties assert competing ownership or beneficiary rights. Situations involving multiple transfers, unclear beneficiary designations, or alleged fraud require a careful litigation-ready strategy that includes detailed fact investigation, depositions, and case development. When the facts are disputed, the court will evaluate the credibility of competing narratives, and a thorough legal plan helps ensure claims are properly presented and defended. The aim is to protect the interests of the trustee and beneficiaries while seeking a legally sound resolution.
When creditor claims, potential tax consequences, or estate liabilities are involved, a more comprehensive legal strategy may be required to address those interrelated matters alongside title correction. Creditors might assert claims against assets, or complex tax implications could arise depending on the nature of the property and trust terms. In such cases the legal team coordinates responses, considers estate administration options, and analyzes the best procedural path to protect assets and comply with applicable deadlines. This broader approach ensures that resolving title issues does not create unforeseen legal or financial exposure.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title issues blends careful factual investigation, clear legal argumentation, and proactive stakeholder management. The benefits include increased likelihood of obtaining a favorable court order, reduced risk of later challenges, and protection against claims that could undermine the settlor’s intentions. When the factual record is fully developed and procedural requirements are meticulously met, trustees and beneficiaries can complete transactions, manage property, or distribute assets with greater certainty. This comprehensive preparation helps avoid delays and preserves estate value for intended recipients.
Another key benefit is strategic coordination with related estate matters such as beneficiary claims, creditor concerns, or related petitions. Addressing potential conflicts, notice requirements, and evidentiary gaps before filing enhances the petition’s persuasive force and mitigates the risk of contested hearings. By anticipating common challenges and assembling corroborating documents and witness testimony, a comprehensive approach aims to streamline court proceedings and provide a defensible record of the settlor’s intent, improving the chances of a timely resolution that honors the trust’s terms.
Creating a stronger evidentiary record increases the probability the court will recognize the property as trust-owned. This includes collecting contemporaneous documents, title and deed records, witness declarations, and account statements that corroborate the settlor’s intent. A thorough evidentiary compilation helps address questions about timing, attempts to transfer title, and the settlor’s actions related to trust funding. When the record clearly supports the trust’s claim, courts can issue orders with confidence, enabling trustees to administer the assets without reopening the issue later.
A comprehensive strategy reduces the likelihood of future litigation by addressing potential objections and documenting the facts thoroughly before the court rules. Anticipating opposing arguments and resolving procedural gaps helps produce a final order that is durable and less vulnerable to attack. Clear notice to interested parties and careful handling of competing claims minimize surprises that can lead to post-judgment disputes. The result is greater stability for trust administration and a clearer path for trustees and beneficiaries to manage or distribute assets according to the settlor’s plan.
Start by collecting every relevant document that shows the settlor’s intent to transfer property into the trust. This should include copies of the trust agreement, any deeds showing attempted transfers, bank or brokerage statements referencing the trust, beneficiary designations, and written communications such as emails or letters. Also obtain the decedent’s estate planning folder and any notes about funding the trust. A well-organized file with dated documents increases the credibility of the petition and helps the court see a clear pattern of intent despite a missing formal transfer.
Follow California procedural rules for giving notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties before filing the petition. Clear communication with potential objectors, where possible, can minimize contested hearings and encourage cooperative resolution. Serving notice properly and documenting service helps avoid procedural challenges that could delay relief. When parties are informed and understand the basis for the petition, the court can more readily evaluate the merits of the claim and move toward an order confirming trust ownership, enabling the trustee to administer assets promptly.
A Heggstad petition is worth considering when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, creating uncertainty about administration and distribution. The petition offers a focused court procedure to confirm ownership by the trust so trustees can proceed with management, sale, or distribution. Filing a petition may save time and expense compared with full probate for each affected asset, particularly when the trust document and supporting evidence strongly indicate the settlor’s intent. Timely action can prevent prolonged title issues that impede asset transfers and estate settlement.
You may also consider a petition to avoid disruptions to ongoing financial affairs, such as the ability to access accounts, collect rents, or sell real property. A court order recognizing trust ownership clarifies who has authority to act and reduces the risk of contradictory claims by heirs or creditors. Where parties are uncertain or conflicting documents exist, a properly supported petition can resolve disputes and provide a clear legal foundation for the trustee’s subsequent decisions. This remedy helps ensure the settlor’s estate plan is honored and assets are handled efficiently for the beneficiaries’ benefit.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include a deed never transferred into the trust, bank or investment accounts remaining in the decedent’s name, or a transfer-on-death designation that fails to reflect trust ownership. Other scenarios involve real property purchased by the settlor with the intent to place it in trust but lacking formal title changes, or when transactions were interrupted by illness or death. These situations create a mismatch between the settlor’s estate plan and recorded ownership, and the petition offers a legal path to reconcile that difference and allow trust administration to proceed.
A frequent issue arises when a real estate deed remains in the decedent’s individual name despite the settlor’s intention to hold the property in trust. This can occur because the settlor forgot to re-title the property, lacked time to complete the transfer, or believed another action had been taken. A Heggstad petition uses evidence such as the trust agreement, communications, and witness testimony to show the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned. When the court is persuaded, it can enter an order confirming trust ownership, enabling the trustee to handle the property.
Financial accounts and investment holdings sometimes remain titled in an individual’s name even after a trust has been created. Without re-titling, these assets may be subject to probate administration or access issues. A Heggstad petition can resolve this by demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include those accounts in the trust. Supporting documents might include beneficiary designations, trust assignment forms, or transaction records. When the court confirms trust ownership, the trustee gains authority to manage or transfer those accounts in alignment with the trust’s terms.
Sometimes property was purchased with funds intended for the trust or labeled as trust property in related documents, but the deed or title transfer was never completed. Situations like illness, oversight, or unexpected death can interrupt the process. A Heggstad petition establishes that the settlor’s intent existed and that the failure to transfer title was a technical omission. Courts consider the totality of evidence, and a successful petition results in an order that treats the property as trust-owned so that trustees can proceed with the trust’s distribution and management plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Soda Bay and throughout Lake County to address trust-related title questions and estate administration matters. If you face property that was intended to be in a trust but remains in the decedent’s name, our firm can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy is appropriate. We assist with document review, petition drafting, notice procedures, and court representation when needed. Our focus is on achieving practical results that respect the settlor’s plan and provide trustees and beneficiaries with clear legal authority to act.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because the firm emphasizes careful case preparation and practical court solutions for trust title disputes. We begin by conducting a thorough review of trust documents, title records, and pertinent communications to determine the best path forward. Our team prepares clear petitions and supporting declarations that present the facts in a persuasive manner and comply with California procedural requirements. We strive to keep clients informed at every step and to pursue the most efficient route to secure a court order recognizing trust ownership when appropriate.
When a petition or related court action is necessary, we focus on building a reliable factual record and fulfilling notice obligations to reduce the risk of objections that could delay resolution. This includes working with trustees and witnesses to prepare declarations, gathering documentary exhibits, and drafting legal arguments tailored to the court’s standards. Our goal is to resolve title issues so trustees can manage or distribute assets smoothly, protecting the interests of beneficiaries while honoring the settlor’s intent documented in the trust instruments.
We also counsel clients on alternative approaches when a petition may not be the best option, providing candid guidance about timelines, likely outcomes, and the steps needed to protect assets during the process. Our practice handles related matters such as trust modification petitions, trust administration, and filing pour-over wills or HIPAA authorizations when those documents are relevant to the estate issues. By taking a comprehensive view of the client’s objectives and legal constraints, the firm works to arrive at solutions that minimize delay and expense while achieving reliable legal outcomes.
Our process starts with an initial review of the trust documents and title records to assess whether a Heggstad petition is suitable. We then gather supporting evidence, prepare declarations and exhibits, and identify parties requiring notice under California law. After drafting the petition and related legal filings, we file with the probate court and serve interested parties. If a hearing is required, we prepare the factual presentation and legal argument to support the requested order. Throughout the process we communicate progress, anticipate potential objections, and adapt the approach to achieve an efficient resolution for our clients.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the facts and documents that bear on trust ownership. This includes examining the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any communications showing an intention to transfer property into the trust. We also identify potential interested parties and gather witness information. This early stage clarifies whether the petition route is appropriate, which evidence will be most persuasive, and what additional steps might be necessary to address competing claims or procedural hurdles. A well-documented case lays the foundation for a successful petition.
Our team reviews deeds, trust instruments, account records, and any relevant correspondence to understand how title presently stands and what steps were taken toward funding the trust. We check public records to verify current vesting and look for any encumbrances or liens. This analysis helps us identify gaps in the documentary record, determine what additional proof is needed, and plan the most effective way to present the factual narrative to the court. Accurate title analysis ensures the petition addresses the precise legal question before the probate court.
We identify individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent or actions related to trust funding and prepare declarations for their testimony. Declarations are drafted to capture specific facts, dates, and events, and are supported by documentary exhibits whenever possible. The goal is to compile a coherent and credible factual account that the court can evaluate. Clear witness statements reduce uncertainty and provide context for interpreting the trust document and title records, improving the petition’s prospects in court.
After building the evidentiary record, we draft and finalize the petition and supporting materials, including exhibits and a points and authorities memorandum tailored to relevant California law and case precedents. We ensure the petition identifies required parties and prepares proper service documents. Once filed with the probate court, we arrange for notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties as required. Proper attention to filing formalities and notice obligations is essential to prevent unnecessary delays or procedural challenges to the petition.
Drafting the petition involves presenting a clear factual narrative supported by declarations and exhibits, together with legal argument that frames the request within California statutory and case law. The memorandum of points and authorities summarizes legal standards and helps the court understand why confirmation of trust ownership is appropriate. Careful drafting ensures that the petition addresses likely objections and provides the court with a well-organized record from which to make findings and issue an order in favor of the trust when warranted.
We arrange for proper service of the petition and accompanying documents on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties to meet statutory notice requirements. Documentation of service is filed with the court to demonstrate compliance. Clear and timely notice allows parties to raise concerns early and can reduce the likelihood of contested hearings. Where feasible, engaging in pre-filing communication with beneficiaries may facilitate agreement and expedite the court’s consideration of the petition, allowing trustees to proceed more quickly with administering trust assets.
If the court schedules a hearing on the petition, we present the factual record and legal argument in support of confirmatory relief. That presentation typically relies on the trustee’s declaration, witness statements, and documentary exhibits. At the hearing the court evaluates the totality of evidence and determines whether the property should be treated as trust-owned. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies title and authorizes the trustee to act under the trust. Such an order facilitates asset management, sale, or distribution according to trust terms.
At the hearing we succinctly present the evidence and explain why the court should find that the property belonged to the trust based on the settlor’s intent. We highlight the trust agreement, declarations, and supporting documentation that together create a coherent factual picture. The goal is to provide the judge with a clear and organized record for decision making. Effective presentation involves anticipating questions, clarifying ambiguities in the record, and addressing any objections or concerns raised by interested parties in a focused manner.
When the court issues an order confirming trust ownership, we assist with implementing that order in the title records, financial institutions, and other relevant places. This may involve recording the court order with the county recorder for real property, updating account registrations, and notifying institutions about the change in ownership status. Implementation ensures that trustees can manage, sell, or distribute assets in accordance with the trust terms without further administrative barriers, thereby completing the legal process that began with the petition filing.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare certain property belonged to a trust despite the absence of a formal recorded transfer. Courts look at the settlor’s intent, supporting documents, and witness testimony to make this determination. It is used when recorded title does not reflect the trust ownership the settlor intended, and the petition provides a legal mechanism to align recorded ownership with the settlor’s estate plan. The petition is appropriate when the trustee has documents and testimony that support the claim and when parties interested in the estate can be notified. It aims to confirm trust ownership so trustees can administer or distribute the asset without subjecting it to full probate administration, though results depend on the strength of the evidence presented and any objections raised by interested parties.
Timing for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on the complexity of the facts, the need to gather evidence, notice periods, and the court’s schedule. In straightforward cases where documentation is clear and there are no objections, the process can be completed in a matter of months. More complicated situations involving contested facts or multiple interested parties will generally take longer and may require additional hearings. Early preparation and proper notice help streamline the timeline. Gathering declarations and exhibits in advance, addressing potential disputes proactively, and ensuring compliance with procedural rules will reduce delays. Your counsel can provide a more precise estimate after reviewing the specific circumstances and court calendar for the county where the petition will be filed.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad petition tends to be a combination of a clear trust document, contemporaneous actions showing attempts to fund the trust, and credible witness declarations describing the settlor’s intent. Documents such as deeds, transfer correspondence, account statements, and notes reflecting the settlor’s plan can help the court see a consistent pattern consistent with trust ownership. Witness declarations that recount specific conversations, dates, and actions can fill factual gaps, especially when formal transfer documents are missing. Courts assess the totality of the evidence, including how cohesive and consistent the documentary and testimonial record is, to determine whether to recognize trust ownership without a formal deed transfer.
A successful Heggstad petition can result in a court order that treats the asset as trust property, which often avoids the need for the asset to pass through probate. However, whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the nature and extent of assets titled in the decedent’s name and any creditor, tax, or other estate matters that must be addressed. Some estates may still require a limited probate or other petitions for unrelated assets. An evaluation of the full estate and related legal issues is necessary to determine whether a petition will fully prevent probate for all assets. Counsel can review the estate’s inventory and advise on the most efficient path that honors the settlor’s intent while addressing remaining legal requirements.
When filing a Heggstad petition, notice must generally be provided to all beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties as prescribed by California probate rules. Proper notice gives interested parties the opportunity to object if they believe the property should not be treated as trust-owned. Proof of service must be filed with the court to show compliance with these requirements. Providing clear, timely notice helps reduce surprises and potential contestation. In some cases, prior discussion with beneficiaries can lead to voluntary agreements that streamline the court process. Where notice reveals potential disputes, the subsequent proceedings will give the court a chance to evaluate competing assertions and decide accordingly.
Creditors may assert claims against assets if they believe an asset is part of the decedent’s probate estate, and in some cases creditor claims can factor into litigation over asset ownership. A Heggstad petition focuses on establishing trust ownership, but it may be necessary to address creditor concerns as part of the broader estate picture. Courts will consider relevant laws regarding creditor notice and claims when resolving disputes over asset title. Addressing creditor issues early, including confirming whether claims are timely and properly asserted, helps minimize unexpected complications. Counsel can evaluate creditor exposure and coordinate the petition with appropriate notices or defenses to prevent inadvertent loss of estate value while pursuing confirmation of trust ownership.
If an heir objects to the petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule additional hearings or request supplemental evidence. An objection does not automatically prevent the petition from succeeding, but it may extend the timeline and require more robust evidence to resolve factual disputes. The court will weigh competing declarations, documents, and testimony to determine the settlor’s intent. When objections arise, the resolution may involve negotiation, additional discovery, or litigation. The objective is to present a clear record that enables the judge to decide whether the asset should be treated as trust property, and addressing objections proactively can sometimes lead to agreements that avoid protracted court battles.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition vary depending on the amount of evidence to be gathered, whether parties object, and how extensive court hearings become. In straightforward matters with solid documentary support and cooperative parties, the cost can be modest compared with full probate. Complex or contested cases that require depositions, expert analysis, or prolonged hearings will increase expenses accordingly. Counsel can provide an estimate after reviewing the case and outlining likely tasks. Early organization of documents and proactive communication with interested parties often reduces both time and cost. Transparency about likely fees and costs helps clients decide the most practical path for resolving title issues.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be used for financial accounts and investment holdings as well as for real property, provided there is sufficient evidence that the decedent intended those assets to be part of the trust. Records showing account titling, beneficiary designations, or transfer attempts, together with trust documentation and witness declarations, help the court assess whether the accounts should be treated as trust property. Each institution may have its own procedures for updating records once a court order is obtained. After a successful petition, trustees commonly use the court order to present to banks or brokerage firms to re-title accounts or release funds in accordance with the trust’s terms, enabling trustees to manage those assets as the trust directs.
If you believe a Heggstad petition is needed, begin by collecting all trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent. Compile contact information for individuals who can attest to the settlor’s plans and actions. Organize these materials chronologically and note any gaps so those can be addressed during case preparation. Reach out to counsel early for an assessment and to confirm which documents and declarations will be most persuasive. Early consultation helps identify whether additional steps such as title searches or creditor reviews are needed before filing the petition, and allows the process to move forward more efficiently once the petition is prepared.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas