If you are considering modifying a trust in Acton, this guide explains what a trust modification petition involves and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist. A trust modification petition may be necessary when circumstances change, when terms need clarification, or when a trustee or beneficiary relationship must be adjusted. Our goal is to help you understand the practical steps, timelines, and potential outcomes so you can make informed decisions about your estate plan. This overview covers common reasons for modification, the legal process in California, and what documentation and evidence typically support a successful petition.
Navigating trust modification in Los Angeles County involves careful attention to state law and local court procedures. Whether you seek to correct ambiguities, reflect new circumstances, or address administrative issues with a trust, the petition process requires clear drafting, supporting facts, and proper notice to interested parties. This section outlines the initial steps you should take, from gathering relevant trust documents and correspondence to documenting changes in assets or family situation. We emphasize practical guidance on preparing for court filings, responding to objections, and achieving an outcome that aligns with your goals while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
A trust modification petition can provide a formal path to update trust terms and resolve disputes without undermining the trust’s overall intent. It can address changes in beneficiary circumstances, update administrative provisions, or correct drafting mistakes that cause confusion or conflict. Filing a petition helps create a clear legal record of the requested changes and gives the court an opportunity to approve modifications that reflect the settlor’s intent or current realities. Additionally, the process can reduce long-term conflict by clarifying duties and distribution terms, and by offering a vetted legal solution for contested situations and evolving family dynamics.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across Los Angeles County with estate planning and trust administration matters, including trust modification petitions. We provide practical, court-focused guidance tailored to the nuances of California trust law and local court practice. When a trust requires amendment through a court petition, our approach is to assess the factual basis for relief, prepare clear and persuasive filings, and communicate openly with affected parties to pursue an efficient resolution. We strive to balance the legal objectives of the client with transparency and respect for beneficiaries and court expectations throughout the process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change trust provisions, interpret ambiguous terms, or correct errors that affect administration. In California, petitions are governed by state statutory provisions and case law, and there are specific procedural requirements for notice, service, and documentation. Typical grounds include changed circumstances, mistake in the original drafting, or unforeseen tax or administrative consequences. The process generally begins with filing a petition that details the requested relief, the reasons for modification, and any supporting declarations and exhibits that demonstrate why court approval is appropriate under the law.
Successful petitions depend on establishing a clear factual and legal foundation for the requested modification. The court will consider the settlor’s intent, whether the proposed change aligns with that intent, and how the modification affects beneficiaries. Notice to interested parties is a critical requirement, and affected beneficiaries may object or request alternative solutions. It is important to gather all relevant trust documents, correspondence, financial records, and evidence of changed circumstances to support the petition. The process can include negotiation, settlement discussions, and, if necessary, a court hearing to resolve contested issues.
A trust modification petition requests judicial approval to change specific trust terms, interpret ambiguous language, or correct mistakes in the trust instrument. The petition sets out proposed modifications and explains the factual and legal reasons underpinning the request, often relying on evidence of the settlor’s intent, changes in beneficiary needs, or clerical errors that require correction. In California, petitions may also seek instruction for trustees or reformation to reflect what the settlor actually intended. Courts evaluate petitions with attention to preserving the core purpose of the trust and ensuring that any changes are consistent with legal standards and equitable considerations.
The trust modification petition process generally includes identifying the specific relief sought, assembling supporting documentation, preparing the petition and necessary declarations, and providing proper notice to all interested parties. Once filed, interested parties may respond or object, and the parties often engage in settlement discussions to avoid a contested hearing. If the matter proceeds to court, hearings allow the judge to consider evidence and legal arguments before issuing an order. After court approval, the trust document may be amended or a court order will direct the trustee on how to implement the modification in accordance with the decision.
Understanding common terms is helpful when considering a trust modification petition. Familiarity with concepts such as settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, reformation, and notice will clarify the petition process and what the court evaluates. A clear grasp of these terms helps you gather relevant evidence, identify interested parties, and anticipate procedural requirements. Below are concise definitions of several key terms used frequently during petitions, probate court proceedings, and trust administration, designed to help clients and family members follow the process and engage constructively as needed.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms. In a trust modification petition, courts often seek to honor the settlor’s original intent when deciding whether to approve changes. Evidence of the settlor’s wishes can include drafts, correspondence, and testimony about the circumstances surrounding the trust’s creation. If the settlor is still living, their current intent and capacity may be relevant. When the settlor is deceased, the court relies on documented indications of intent and other factual evidence to determine whether a proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s objectives.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered revision of a trust document to correct mistakes or reflect the true intention of the settlor. A petition for reformation typically requires evidence that the document, as written, contains errors that do not match what the settlor intended. Courts exercise caution when approving reformation, ensuring that the requested change accurately reflects the settlor’s intent and does not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries. Supporting documentation, such as draft versions, correspondence, or other contemporaneous records, strengthens the case for reformation by showing the discrepancy between the written document and the intended terms.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust according to its terms and any applicable court orders. Trustees have fiduciary duties to manage trust assets prudently, communicate with beneficiaries, and adhere to instructions set forth in the trust instrument. When a petition seeks to change administrative provisions or trustee powers, the court considers the impact on the trustee’s duties and whether the proposed modification promotes effective administration. Trustees may be named in a petition as respondents and will have an opportunity to present their perspective to the court regarding proposed changes.
Notice to interested parties is a procedural requirement that ensures beneficiaries and other stakeholders are informed about a petition and have an opportunity to respond or object. Proper notice typically involves serving the petition and supporting documents on all persons entitled to receive them under California law. Adequate notice preserves due process and allows the court to consider any objections, proposed alternatives, or agreements among parties. Failure to provide proper notice can delay proceedings or result in the court declining to act until all interested parties have had an opportunity to participate.
When seeking to address trust issues, parties may consider limited remedies such as clarifying interpretations or requesting minor administrative adjustments, versus pursuing a full trust modification or reformation. Limited remedies can be quicker and less disruptive when the issue is narrowly defined and parties are in agreement. A full modification or reformation may be appropriate when the trust contains substantial errors, when materially changed circumstances render original terms impractical, or when the desired change affects distributions or trustee powers. The choice depends on the scope of the problem, the willingness of beneficiaries to cooperate, and the evidence available to support judicial relief.
A limited approach is often appropriate for resolving minor ambiguities or administrative matters that do not alter the substantive distribution scheme of the trust. Examples include clarifying ambiguous language, updating contact information for trustees, correcting typographical errors, or confirming procedural directions for asset management. When all interested parties agree or when the matter is straightforward, a brief petition or stipulated order can provide needed clarity without extensive litigation. These limited filings aim to maintain the overall intent of the trust while addressing discrete issues that hinder efficient administration.
When administrative changes are necessary and beneficiaries do not object, a limited petition can streamline the process and avoid contentious hearings. Examples include updating trustee powers to reflect current financial practices, modifying distribution timelines for convenience, or resolving account identification issues. By focusing narrowly on administrative or procedural fixes, parties can often obtain an order that clarifies duties and allows trustees to act without further impediment. Such an approach preserves relationships among family members and limits expense by avoiding protracted disputes when the underlying trust goals remain unchanged.
Full modification or reformation may be necessary when requested changes affect beneficiary rights, materially alter distribution schemes, or address substantial errors that change the trust’s operation. In such cases, comprehensive legal work is needed to marshal evidence, address statutory standards, and navigate potentially contested proceedings. The court closely reviews the rationale for such amendments to ensure that changes reflect the settlor’s intent or are justified by valid legal grounds. These matters often require detailed factual development, negotiation with multiple parties, and careful presentation to the probate court to achieve a fair outcome.
When modifications are contested by beneficiaries or other interested parties, comprehensive representation helps protect clients’ interests through negotiation and litigation if required. Contested matters often involve complex legal arguments about intent, capacity, undue influence, or interpretation of ambiguous terms. The process may include discovery, depositions, and evidentiary hearings, all of which demand focused preparation and strategic planning. Effective advocacy in contested cases aims to reconcile competing claims, present persuasive evidence, and secure a court order that resolves disputes while respecting the trust instrument’s purpose and applicable law.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all relevant facts and legal issues are considered before seeking judicial relief, which can reduce the likelihood of future challenges. By preparing a complete record that documents the settlor’s intent, changed circumstances, and the reasons for proposed changes, parties improve their chances of obtaining an enforceable order. Thorough preparation also supports more effective negotiations and settlement discussions, as parties and the court can clearly see the basis for the requested relief. This approach promotes durable solutions that support efficient trust administration over time.
Comprehensive preparation can also protect beneficiaries’ interests by anticipating objections and addressing procedural requirements proactively. Detailed filings and well-documented factual support reduce delay and limit the scope of disputes. When courts have a clear and complete presentation, they can issue precise orders that minimize ambiguity in trustee duties and distribution instructions. This level of care helps preserve family relationships by encouraging resolution through informed negotiation and by creating a reliable roadmap for administration after the court acts.
A carefully prepared petition and supporting record can produce a court order that offers clear guidance for trustees and beneficiaries going forward. This greater certainty reduces disputes about interpretation and helps ensure consistent administration of trust assets. A stable and enforceable resolution also helps protect beneficiaries from future litigation and provides trustees with the authority to act confidently. Over time, the clarity provided by court-approved modifications can reduce administrative costs, prevent confusion, and support the settlor’s overall intentions for asset distribution and stewardship.
When a petition is backed by thorough documentation and a clear legal rationale, the court is better positioned to grant modifications that align with the settlor’s wishes or the parties’ reasonable expectations. Comprehensive presentation addresses likely objections in advance and shows the practical necessity or legal basis for the requested change. This reduces the risk of partial rulings or remands and increases the likelihood of an outcome that fulfills the purpose of the trust instrument while balancing beneficiaries’ rights and obligations under California law.
Collect all versions of the trust, related amendments, trust funding documents, correspondence, and financial records that show how the trust has been administered. Documentation such as draft trust instruments, emails, and contemporaneous notes can provide persuasive evidence of the settlor’s intent or demonstrate clerical errors. Organizing these materials early accelerates the petition drafting process and helps identify potential weaknesses that can be addressed before filing. Accurate and complete records also facilitate settlement discussions and support credibility in court when presenting reasons for the requested modification.
When the basis for modification involves changed circumstances, provide clear evidence of those changes, such as medical records, financial statements, or records of family events that affect the trust’s operation. Demonstrating the practical impact of changed circumstances helps the court assess whether a modification is appropriate. Precise documentation reduces ambiguity, supports negotiation positions, and helps the court determine how proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent. Complete factual records also guide trustees and beneficiaries in understanding the need for adjustments and in implementing any approved modifications.
People consider trust modification petitions when the trust no longer reflects current realities, when errors or ambiguities create administrative challenges, or when trustee powers must be adjusted to address modern financial needs. Other reasons include changes in family relationships, beneficiary incapacity, tax planning adjustments, or the need to correct clerical mistakes. A petition offers a judicial remedy to align the trust with present needs while creating a formal record for administration. Deciding to pursue a petition requires weighing the importance of the change against the time and expense of court involvement.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to prevent future disputes by obtaining a definitive court ruling on contested provisions or ambiguous terms. A clear order from the court can help trustees act with confidence and reduce the likelihood of later litigation among beneficiaries. In some situations, petitioning for modification can resolve conflicts proactively and preserve family relationships by fostering negotiation under judicial oversight. Considering these factors early can help determine the most appropriate course of action, whether a limited clarification or a more substantial modification.
Common circumstances that prompt petitions include the discovery of drafting mistakes, changes in beneficiary circumstances such as divorce or incapacity, unforeseen tax consequences, or changes in asset ownership that make trust terms impractical. Trustees may also seek court instruction when unsure how to carry out ambiguous provisions, or beneficiaries may request modification to carry out the settlor’s current wishes. When trust instruments were created some time ago, advances in financial tools or differences in family structure can create a genuine need for court-approved updates to ensure the trust functions as intended.
Ambiguous language or drafting errors in a trust can cause confusion about distribution timing, beneficiary designations, or trustee authority, prompting parties to seek a judicial correction. A petition can clarify ambiguous terms or reform the document to reflect the settlor’s actual intent if evidence supports such a change. Addressing drafting issues through the court produces a clear, enforceable result that trustees can follow without fear of future dispute. Properly documenting the nature of the error and the rationale for correction helps the court understand why modification is needed for sound administration.
Changes in family relationships, such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, often affect how a trust should operate and who should benefit. When these changes make trust provisions outdated or unfair, parties may seek a modification that reflects current family dynamics while respecting the settlor’s underlying intent. The court will evaluate the reasons for change and the proposed modification’s consistency with the trust’s purpose. Presenting clear evidence of these changed circumstances helps the court determine whether an amendment is appropriate and how best to accomplish it.
Shifts in tax law, retirement planning needs, or the identification of assets not properly incorporated into the trust can necessitate adjustment. Trustees or beneficiaries may petition the court to modify administrative provisions or distribution timing to address tax efficiency, integrate retirement accounts, or properly allocate newly discovered assets. A petition grounded in documented financial or tax considerations can enable the court to approve modifications that facilitate practical administration while aligning with the trust’s intent, avoiding future complications related to asset management or tax compliance.
Residents of Acton, Los Angeles County, can rely on local knowledge and court experience when addressing trust modification matters. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients by preparing clear petitions, coordinating service of process, and explaining procedural steps in the local probate court. We prioritize open communication with clients and interested parties to pursue efficient resolutions while safeguarding beneficiaries’ rights. For those facing trust administration uncertainty or contemplating a petition, local representation helps navigate court timelines, filing requirements, and opportunities for settlement in the context of Los Angeles County practice.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused support for trust modification matters, emphasizing careful preparation, clear legal reasoning, and practical solutions that align with clients’ goals. Our approach centers on building a complete factual record, communicating with interested parties, and pursuing a course that seeks to minimize conflict and cost. We advise clients on the most appropriate pathway, whether that is a limited clarification or a full petition for modification, and assist throughout notice, filing, negotiation, and any court proceedings required to achieve an enforceable resolution.
Clients can expect assistance with document collection, drafting persuasive petitions and declarations, and coordinating procedural matters such as proper notice and proof of service. We aim to present the court with a clear statement of the requested relief and the factual support for it, helping judges understand why action is warranted. We also represent clients in settlement discussions to explore alternatives to contested litigation and to secure outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent while balancing beneficiaries’ needs and legal constraints.
When matters become contested, our representation focuses on advancing the client’s position through careful factual development and clear legal argument, while seeking efficient resolution when possible. We work to limit unnecessary dispute by encouraging communication and proposing practical solutions where appropriate. For clients in Acton and surrounding areas who need assistance with trust modification petitions, we provide a measured, court-aware approach intended to achieve durable, defensible results that facilitate smooth administration after the court’s decision.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and related records to determine the appropriate remedy and to identify interested parties. We then gather supporting evidence, draft the petition and necessary declarations, and prepare service documents for notice. We file with the appropriate Los Angeles County probate court and manage communications with opposing parties to explore settlement where possible. If a hearing is needed, we present a concise and well-organized case to the court and follow through on implementing any order issued, including preparing conforming trust documents or advising the trustee on next steps.
The initial phase focuses on gathering trust instruments, amendments, related estate planning documents, and any evidence of the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. We review account records, correspondence, and any relevant medical or financial information that supports the petition. Identifying interested parties early ensures proper notice and helps anticipate potential objections. This stage establishes the factual foundation for the petition and informs strategic decisions about the scope of relief to request, the optimal timing for filing, and whether alternative dispute resolution may be appropriate.
Careful review of the trust and associated documents is essential to determine the exact provisions at issue and to locate any prior amendments or related instruments such as wills, powers of attorney, and funding records. Examining draft versions or correspondence can reveal the settlor’s intent and identify inconsistencies that may justify reformation or clarification. This review also helps determine who must be notified and whether issues such as funding gaps or asset titling require separate action to effectuate a comprehensive solution for trust administration.
We compile a list of beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties who must receive notice and may participate in the proceeding. Gathering declarations, financial records, and supporting exhibits strengthens the petition and reduces the risk of surprise objections. Early identification of stakeholders also allows us to explore settlement opportunities and to tailor the petition to address foreseeable concerns. Thorough evidentiary preparation is critical for persuading the court that the requested modification is appropriate and supported by a complete factual record.
Once the petition and supporting documents are prepared, we file with the probate court and arrange for proper service on all interested parties in accordance with California law. Timely and correct notice is essential to preserve the court’s authority and to provide recipients with the opportunity to respond. After filing, we monitor the response period, address any procedural challenges, and engage with opposing parties to assess prospects for resolution. If objections arise, we evaluate options for narrowing disputes, mediation, or preparing for a contested hearing.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires clear statements of the requested relief, factual declarations, and legal argument tailored to California statutes and case law. We prepare exhibits and proofs of service and ensure that the petition meets the court’s formatting and procedural requirements. Properly drafted filings reduce the likelihood of technical rejections and help the court and other parties quickly understand the issues at stake. Accurate filing also sets the stage for efficient case management and opportunities for early resolution where appropriate.
After filing, we ensure each interested party receives the petition and supporting documents through proper service methods, and we track the statutory response deadlines. When responses or objections are filed, we review them promptly to determine whether negotiation, clarification, or supplemental evidence can resolve the dispute without a hearing. Effective communication during this phase can often narrow issues and reduce litigation time and expense, while also preserving options to pursue court intervention when resolution through agreement is not possible.
If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present evidence and legal argument to the probate court, addressing objections and clarifying how the proposed modification serves the trust’s purpose. After the court issues its decision, we assist with any required implementation, including drafting conforming documents, updating asset titles, and advising trustees on compliance with the order. Whether through settlement or judicial ruling, this final phase focuses on translating the court’s decision into practical steps that allow trustees to administer the trust in accordance with the modified terms.
At hearing, the court evaluates declarations, documentary exhibits, and testimony to determine whether the requested modification is legally justified and consistent with the settlor’s intent. Presenting a well-organized record and clear factual narrative increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling. The hearing also provides an opportunity to address objections and to propose compromise solutions. Preparation includes anticipating objections, identifying supporting witnesses or documents, and presenting concise argument to help the court reach a reasoned conclusion that provides clear instructions for trust administration.
Following a court order, we assist clients with any necessary steps to implement modifications, such as preparing conforming amendments, advising trustees on new duties, and guiding how to retitle assets when appropriate. Proper implementation ensures that the trust functions as the court intended and reduces the chance of future disputes. We also help document compliance with the order and provide guidance on long-term administration matters that may arise from the changes, ensuring trustees and beneficiaries have a clear plan to follow moving forward.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change, interpret, or correct trust terms. It is used when the trust contains ambiguities, clerical errors, or provisions that no longer function as intended due to changed circumstances. The petition details the specific relief sought, the factual basis for the change, and the legal grounds under California law. It is accompanied by declarations and exhibits that document the settlor’s original intent and the reasons for the requested modification. Filing is appropriate when informal agreement among parties is not available or when a court order is needed to give trustees clear authority. Proper notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is required so they may respond or object. Courts balance the settlor’s intent with fairness to beneficiaries and the legal standards for reformation or interpretation when deciding whether to grant relief.
California courts evaluate petitions by considering statutory criteria, case law, the settlor’s intent, and the impact on beneficiaries. For reformation or modification, the petitioner must present a persuasive factual record, such as draft documents, communications, or evidence showing a mistake or changed circumstances that justify the requested change. The court will also consider whether the change aligns with the overall purpose of the trust and whether it creates unfair prejudice. Procedural fairness is also important, so courts require proper notice to interested parties and consider any objections raised. If the petition is contested, factual credibility and the quality of evidence presented at hearing will influence the court’s decision, which aims to resolve ambiguities while preserving the core intent of the trust instrument.
Notice must be provided to all beneficiaries, trustees, and other parties who have a legal interest in the trust under California law. This ensures that those affected have the opportunity to respond, object, or participate in settlement discussions. Proper service methods and adherence to statutory timeframes are essential to avoid procedural defects that can delay the case or require re-filing. Identifying interested parties early helps manage the process and anticipate potential objections. Counsel typically prepares a comprehensive list of beneficiaries and related parties and arranges service in accordance with the Probate Code, while monitoring responses and addressing any procedural challenges that might arise during the petition process.
Yes, trusts can be modified after the settlor’s death through a petition when circumstances warrant reformation, interpretation, or correction. Courts may approve modifications that reflect the settlor’s intent if evidence supports that the written document does not accurately reflect those intentions due to mistake or ambiguity. The probate court seeks to honor the settlor’s objectives while ensuring the modification is legally justified and equitable to beneficiaries. Post-death petitions often require substantial documentary evidence, such as drafts, communications, or testimony that clarify intent. Courts review the totality of evidence and weigh it against objections from beneficiaries, if any, before issuing an order that guides administration consistent with the settlor’s demonstrated wishes.
Evidence supporting reformation often includes draft trust instruments, correspondence between the settlor and attorney, notes from meetings, and contemporaneous documents that reveal the settlor’s intent. Financial records demonstrating how assets were intended to be managed and any actions taken by the settlor consistent with the intended plan can also be persuasive. The goal is to show a clear discrepancy between the trust’s written language and what the settlor intended. Affidavits or declarations from witnesses who were involved in the drafting process can strengthen the petition, as can evidence of clerical errors or omissions. A well-organized evidentiary presentation helps the court understand the nature of the mistake and whether reformation would better effectuate the settlor’s objectives without unfairly harming beneficiaries.
The timeline for a petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, whether the matter is contested, and court scheduling in Los Angeles County. Uncontested petitions with proper notice and no objections can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. Contested matters that require discovery, evidence development, and a contested hearing may take several months or longer to reach resolution due to procedural requirements and court calendars. Prompt and thorough preparation, accurate notice, and early efforts to resolve disputes through negotiation can shorten the process. However, when significant disputes arise, expect additional time for briefing, motions, and hearings as the court works through contested factual and legal issues.
Modifications are not always contested. Many petitions address limited, uncontested administrative matters or clarifications where beneficiaries agree or do not object. In such instances, the court can often grant relief without a full hearing. Parties may also reach settlements that produce stipulated orders, avoiding protracted litigation and preserving family relationships. When disputes exist, hearings may be required to resolve credibility issues and legal arguments. Even contested matters can sometimes be resolved through negotiation or mediation if parties are willing to engage constructively. Whether contested or uncontested, careful preparation of the petition and evidence improves the chances of an efficient and fair outcome.
A trustee’s fiduciary duties require them to act in the best interests of beneficiaries, manage assets prudently, and follow the terms of the trust. When a trustee seeks modification or is asked to implement changes, the court considers whether the requested relief aligns with these duties and whether it promotes sound administration. Trustees must act transparently, provide accountings when required, and avoid self-dealing or conflicts of interest when proposing modifications. If a trustee’s actions are challenged, the court examines whether those actions were reasonable and consistent with the trust’s purpose. Trustees should document their decision-making and consult with counsel to ensure proposed modifications or administrative steps comply with fiduciary obligations and the court’s expectations.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiation among beneficiaries, executing amendments if the trust’s terms and state law permit, or using nonjudicial settlement procedures where all interested parties consent. Mediation can also help resolve disputes and produce agreements that the court can adopt, reducing litigation costs. When parties are cooperative, these alternatives can be faster and less adversarial than contested court proceedings. However, not all issues can be resolved without court involvement, especially when parties disagree or when statutory requirements demand judicial oversight. In those cases, a petition provides the authoritative path for modifying or clarifying trust terms while protecting the rights of all interested parties.
Preparing your family and documents before filing involves gathering trust instruments, amendments, financial records, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. Discussing the matter with key family members and identifying interested parties early can help reduce surprises and facilitate notice. Clear organization of documents and a timeline of relevant events will streamline the petition process and support a persuasive presentation to the court. Communicating the reasons for the proposed modification and encouraging cooperation where possible can promote settlement and reduce conflict. When disputes are likely, preparing a strong evidentiary record and understanding potential objections help you set realistic expectations about timelines and outcomes while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas