If you are a resident of Agoura Hills or elsewhere in Los Angeles County considering changes to an existing trust, a trust modification petition may be the appropriate legal path. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients with understanding when a petition to modify a trust is needed, the practical effects of amendments, and how the process interacts with other estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and powers of attorney. This page outlines key considerations to help you make informed decisions about updating trust terms.
Trusts sometimes need updates because of changed family circumstances, new financial realities, or shifts in California law. A trust modification petition allows a court to authorize changes that cannot be made informally due to legal constraints, beneficiary objections, or questions about a settlor’s capacity. This process can preserve the settlor’s intent while reducing future disputes among heirs. We explain how petitions are filed in Los Angeles County, what evidence is typically required, and steps to protect assets and family relationships during the modification process.
A properly handled trust modification petition can prevent long-term uncertainty and reduce the likelihood of costly disputes. When circumstances have changed or a trust contains terms that are ambiguous or impossible to carry out, a court-directed modification can restore clarity and ensure that assets are distributed in line with the settlor’s current intentions. This approach often avoids the expense and delay of full trust litigation by targeting specific provisions for amendment. It also helps trustees and beneficiaries move forward with confidence when formal authority is needed to make necessary adjustments.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on practical estate planning and trust administration. Our team assists with a full range of documents including revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and trust petitions. We emphasize clear communication, careful preparation of petitions and supporting declarations, and strategies that aim to preserve family relationships while protecting client interests. For clients in Agoura Hills and surrounding communities, we combine local procedural knowledge with a commitment to helping families navigate complex trust matters thoughtfully and responsibly.
A trust modification petition is a formal request submitted to a probate or superior court asking for permission to alter specific terms or provisions of an existing trust. Grounds for filing can include a settlor’s changed circumstances, clerical errors, ambiguities that make administration impracticable, or situations where the settlor’s intent must be clarified. The court considers evidence, including declarations and sometimes testimony, to determine whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s present intent or resolves an enforceable problem. This process is governed by California trust and probate rules and local procedures in Los Angeles County.
When pursuing a modification petition, careful planning and documentation are essential. The petitioner must prepare a clear statement of the modification sought, identify parties with notice rights, and explain why informal amendment is not appropriate or possible. Beneficiaries and other interested parties may object, and the court will weigh their interests against the proposed change. The timeline can vary depending on whether the petition is uncontested or contested. Proper legal guidance helps ensure petitions are well-supported and tailored to achieve a durable resolution.
A trust modification petition formally asks the court to approve changes to a trust where direct amendment is not feasible or where legal clarity is required. Common situations include correcting drafting errors, realigning trust terms with a settlor’s updated wishes, resolving conflicts between trust provisions and current law, or addressing trustee powers that need adjustment. The petition outlines the requested changes, provides factual support, and identifies affected beneficiaries. Courts evaluate whether the modification furthers the settlor’s intent or remedies an administration problem, and may grant the petition with appropriate findings and conditions.
Successful petitions include a clear description of the trust provision to be changed, a proposed revised drafting, factual declarations showing why the change is necessary, and a list of interested parties for notice purposes. Filing typically requires submitting proposed orders and supporting exhibits and serving copies on beneficiaries and trustees. Courts may schedule a hearing where objections can be heard. In some cases, parties reach agreement and submit a stipulated order without contested litigation. Attention to procedural detail and thorough documentation increases the likelihood of a prompt and enforceable result.
Below are common terms you will encounter when pursuing a trust modification petition in California. Understanding these definitions can make it easier to follow court filings, declarations, and orders, and help you communicate effectively with the attorney handling the petition. Terms address roles such as settlor and trustee, legal concepts like capacity and intent, and procedural elements like notice and proposed orders. Clear familiarity with this vocabulary reduces confusion and supports informed decision making throughout the process.
The settlor, sometimes called the trustor, is the person who created the trust and whose intentions govern the trust’s terms. Understanding the settlor’s original purpose and any subsequent communications or actions is central to resolving requests for modification. Courts consider the settlor’s intent and any evidence that clarifies wishes when deciding whether to approve a proposed change. In cases where the settlor’s capacity or consent is at issue, additional documentation or testimony may be required to support the petition and to demonstrate that the modification accurately reflects the settlor’s objectives.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust according to its terms and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary duties to manage trust assets prudently, make distributions per the trust, and act in beneficiaries’ best interests. When a petition asks the court to modify trustee powers or clarify duties, the trustee’s role is central to both the petition and any resulting order. Trustees may be required to participate in the petition process, provide records or declarations, and implement approved modifications after the court issues its decision.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits, distributions, or other interests under the terms of a trust. Beneficiaries may have the right to receive notice of petitions that affect their interests and may object if they believe a proposed modification would harm their rights. Courts weigh beneficiary interests when considering modifications and may impose conditions to protect those interests while allowing necessary changes. Clear communication with beneficiaries and careful drafting of proposed modifications can reduce the risk of objections and contested proceedings.
Capacity refers to the mental ability of the settlor to understand and make decisions about their property and the effects of trust terms. Intent speaks to what the settlor wanted the trust to accomplish. Courts often analyze both capacity and intent in modification petitions to determine whether the requested change accurately reflects the settlor’s wishes and whether the settlor was able to form those wishes when the original trust or later communications were made. Documentation such as medical records, declarations, and contemporaneous statements can be important evidence in these evaluations.
When a trust no longer fits current circumstances, property owners can consider a narrow court petition to modify specific provisions, or a broader approach that revises multiple trust elements through amendment or restatement. Limited petitions focus on targeted issues like correcting language or updating a beneficiary designation, often requiring less disruption and cost. Broader revisions may address systemic issues or comprehensive estate plan changes, which can offer long-term clarity but may involve more extensive negotiation and documentation. Deciding which path to take depends on the nature of the issue, parties involved, and long-term planning goals.
A limited petition is often suitable when a trust contains a typographical or drafting error that undermines administration, such as an incorrect asset description or a conflicting distribution clause. In such cases, the court can approve a narrowly focused correction that preserves the trust’s overall structure while removing language that causes confusion. This targeted approach minimizes disruption for beneficiaries and trustees and usually resolves the problem more quickly than a full trust restatement, while maintaining alignment with the settlor’s original intent wherever that intent is clear.
If the need for change is confined to one provision—such as adjusting the timing of a distribution, clarifying trustee authority over a particular asset, or updating a successor trustee designation—a limited modification petition can accomplish that goal without altering unrelated terms. This approach can reduce the time and expense involved in court review, and it can be less likely to provoke objections from beneficiaries who are not affected by the change. The narrow petition should include precise proposed language and supporting facts to justify the specific alteration.
A comprehensive approach is warranted when a trust contains multiple provisions that interact in ways that could cause future disputes or inconsistent administration. Examples include outdated distribution schemes that no longer reflect family realities, trust terms that conflict with recent changes in law, or complex asset structures that require coordinated adjustments. In these circumstances, a full amendment or restatement helps ensure that all provisions work together harmoniously and that the trust aligns with current planning objectives and legal requirements.
Significant life events such as marriage, divorce, birth of new heirs, substantial changes in wealth, or major asset transfers may call for a comprehensive revision rather than piecemeal fixes. A broader update allows you to revisit beneficiary designations, trustee appointments, distribution timing, and tax planning provisions to ensure the overall plan reflects present needs. When multiple interdependent changes are required, addressing them together reduces the risk of inconsistencies and supports a cohesive estate plan that better serves the settlor and beneficiaries over time.
A comprehensive revision can provide long-term clarity and stability by ensuring all trust provisions are consistent and aligned with current goals. Rather than addressing symptoms of a problem individually, a full update evaluates the trust holistically, which can reduce future litigation risk and simplify administration. This process also creates an opportunity to integrate new planning tools and address modern issues such as digital asset management, retirement plan coordination, and charitable giving strategies, producing a coherent plan that functions smoothly for trustees and beneficiaries.
Comprehensive modifications can also improve tax planning, streamline succession arrangements, and update trustee roles to reflect current family dynamics and financial realities. By reviewing the plan in its entirety, potential conflicts between provisions can be identified and resolved, and clear instructions can be put in place for trustees. The result is a trust document that better anticipates future issues and reduces ambiguity, making administration more predictable and reducing the likelihood of costly disputes down the line.
One primary benefit of a comprehensive revision is the elimination of contradictory provisions and the creation of consistent distribution rules. This cohesion helps trustees carry out their duties without needing repeated court guidance, and it reduces confusion among beneficiaries. When all clauses are harmonized and cross-referenced appropriately, administration becomes more efficient and predictable. A well-structured trust reduces the risk of disputes and supports the settlor’s broader estate planning goals by providing clear, actionable instructions that trustees can follow confidently.
A full trust revision offers the chance to modernize provisions to reflect current tax considerations, beneficiary needs, and trustee capabilities, which enhances long-term planning outcomes. By updating distribution timing, contingency provisions, and successor designations, the settlor can create a plan that adapts to future changes. Comprehensive updates also allow for incorporation of newer planning devices and detailed instructions for trustees, fostering flexibility while maintaining clear boundaries and objectives for the trust over time.
Careful documentation of the settlor’s intent is one of the most persuasive elements of a successful petition. Gather contemporaneous communications, dated letters, and any prior trust drafts that reflect the settlor’s wishes. Medical records and declarations from those who regularly interacted with the settlor can also be helpful when capacity or intent is questioned. Clear, organized evidence helps the court understand the basis for the requested change and reduces the potential for objections from beneficiaries who may interpret the trust differently.
Providing timely notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties encourages transparency and can prevent surprises that lead to objections. Early communication may facilitate voluntary resolution or agreement, which can save time and expense. When notice reveals potential conflicts, consider mediation or settlement discussions before litigation escalates. Courts typically require formal notice under probate rules, so combining early informal outreach with proper legal service often produces the best practical outcomes for all parties involved.
Consider a trust modification petition when a trust no longer reflects current realities, such as significant life events, ambiguous language that hampers administration, or legal changes that affect trust operations. If the settlor lacks capacity to sign a formal amendment, or if beneficiaries contest a proposed change, a petition can provide a judicial path to resolution. Seeking a petition helps to create a formal record that clarifies intent and establishes court-approved authority for trustees, reducing future uncertainty and potential litigation among heirs and fiduciaries.
You may also consider a petition when trustee powers need formal clarification or when assets have changed in ways not anticipated by the original trust terms. For example, unexpected business interests, money from settlements, or newly acquired property can require trust language adjustments to ensure appropriate management and distribution. Whether the need is narrow or broad, a well-supported petition helps trustees fulfill their duties and preserves the trust’s purpose, providing stability for beneficiaries who depend on the trust’s guidance.
Typical circumstances include errors in the trust document, conflicts between beneficiaries, changes in family structure such as births or divorces, newly discovered assets, or changes in the settlor’s intentions that cannot be accomplished through informal amendment. Trustees may request clarifying orders when duties are unclear or when creditor claims create complications. Each scenario requires careful analysis to determine whether a narrow correction or broader revision is appropriate, and whether court approval is necessary to achieve a legally enforceable outcome.
Drafting errors or omissions can create real-world problems for trustees and beneficiaries by making it unclear how assets should be managed or distributed. When key terms are missing, dates are incorrect, or asset descriptions are imprecise, the trustee may be unable to act without court guidance. A petition that corrects those errors clarifies administration, reduces delays, and aligns distributions with what the settlor intended. Properly documenting the nature of the error and proposed corrective language assists the court in granting an effective remedy.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or major financial changes often prompt a review of trust provisions. When such events alter beneficiary relationships or the appropriateness of prior distributions, a modification petition can adjust terms to better reflect current priorities. For instance, adding provisions for a new descendant or adjusting shares in response to changed financial needs may require court approval when the settlor cannot directly amend the trust. Thoughtful revisions help ensure the trust remains relevant and fair under present circumstances.
Ambiguous language that impedes trustees from carrying out their duties can create administrative paralysis and disputes among beneficiaries. When trustees face conflicting interpretations of distribution instructions, powers, or conditions, a judicial clarification through a modification petition can resolve those conflicts and provide authority to proceed. Court-approved clarification promotes efficient trust administration and reduces the risk that well-meaning actions will be second-guessed later, helping trustees fulfill obligations and beneficiaries receive intended benefits without protracted disagreement.
If you live in Agoura Hills or elsewhere in Los Angeles County and need help with a trust modification petition, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can guide you through local procedures and filing requirements. We understand the probate and superior court processes in nearby jurisdictions and assist clients with preparing petitions, gathering evidence, serving notice, and representing their interests at hearings when necessary. Our goal is to help clients obtain clear, enforceable court orders that reflect appropriate adjustments to trust documents while minimizing disruption for trustees and beneficiaries.
Clients rely on our firm for practical legal support that focuses on resolving trust issues efficiently and with careful attention to detail. We prioritize well-documented petitions and transparent communication so clients understand the likely outcomes and procedural steps. Our team assists with drafting proposed orders, preparing supporting declarations, and coordinating notice to interested parties. By taking a methodical approach, we aim to minimize surprises and position petitions for favorable resolution while keeping clients informed at every stage of the process.
We also emphasize proactive planning to reduce the likelihood of future conflicts. In addition to court petitions, we advise on steps that trustees and settlors can take to prevent disputes, such as maintaining clear records, executing pour-over wills and powers of attorney that align with trust terms, and periodically reviewing plan documents. For families with diverse assets or evolving circumstances, our guidance helps create a cohesive plan that supports smooth administration and long-term clarity.
Finally, we assist clients in evaluating alternatives and pursuing the most efficient path to resolution, whether that means negotiating an agreed order with beneficiaries or proceeding through a contested hearing when necessary. Clients appreciate our focus on practical outcomes, local court familiarity, and a commitment to preserving family relationships where possible. For trust matters in Agoura Hills and across Los Angeles County, our firm provides consistent legal support aimed at producing durable and legally sound results.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document, related estate planning instruments, and the facts prompting the modification. We evaluate whether an informal amendment is possible or whether a formal petition is necessary, gather supporting evidence such as declarations and records, and identify all interested parties who require notice. We prepare the petition with proposed language, file documents with the appropriate court in Los Angeles County, and handle service and scheduling. If a hearing is required, we present the factual and legal basis for the requested modification and pursue an order that implements the change.
The first step is a comprehensive document and factual review to determine the extent of the issue and the best legal path forward. We examine the trust, wills, powers of attorney, asset lists, and any relevant communications from the settlor. This review helps determine whether the modification needed is narrow or broad, identifies potential opponents or beneficiaries to be notified, and informs whether alternative dispute resolution might avoid court intervention. Clear initial strategy and planning reduce surprises and streamline later steps in the process.
Collecting documents is critical to supporting the petition. This includes the trust instrument, prior drafts or amendments, medical records if capacity is relevant, correspondence indicating intent, and financial records showing asset ownership. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent can be important. Organizing this material into a coherent evidentiary package increases the petition’s credibility and helps the court understand why the modification is appropriate. Well-prepared documentation also aids in settlement discussions with beneficiaries.
Drafting clear proposed language for the court is essential. The proposed modification should precisely state the changes sought and include a redline or comparative version so the court and interested parties can see exactly how the trust will be altered. The drafting should anticipate potential objections and include proposed findings to support the change. Clear, unambiguous language reduces the chance of future disputes and aids trustees in carrying out the revised terms once the court enters an order.
Once the petition and supporting materials are prepared, the next step is filing with the appropriate court and ensuring proper service on all interested parties. California probate rules require notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other parties who may be affected. Properly documented service and a complete proof of service are essential to establish the court’s authority to act. When all parties receive notice early and clearly, it can facilitate voluntary resolution and reduce the need for contested hearings, though objections are sometimes inevitable.
Service must comply with California rules, which may require personal service or other methods depending on the parties involved. We prepare comprehensive service lists, follow statutory timelines, and file proofs of service to document that all required recipients received notice. Careful attention to service details helps ensure the court has jurisdiction to act and prevents procedural challenges that could delay resolution. Transparent notice practices also create opportunities for negotiation and settlement before a contested hearing.
If beneficiaries or other interested parties object to the proposed modification, we evaluate the basis for their objections and pursue negotiation or settlement where possible. Mediation or focused discussions can often resolve disputes without protracted litigation. When settlement is not possible, we prepare responsive pleadings and evidence to address objections at the hearing. Our approach seeks to limit adversarial conflict while ensuring the court has the information necessary to make a sound decision based on the settlor’s intent and relevant legal standards.
If the matter proceeds to hearing, the court will consider the petition, supporting declarations, evidence, and any objections. We present the factual record, proposed findings, and legal arguments showing why the requested modification is appropriate. The court may grant the petition in full, in part, or impose conditions to protect beneficiaries. Once an order is entered, trustees implement the modifications and update trust records to reflect the court-directed changes, ensuring consistent administration going forward.
At the hearing, the petitioner must present a coherent narrative supported by declarations, documentary evidence, and, when necessary, witness testimony. The goal is to show that the proposed modification clarifies the settlor’s intent or remedies an administrative problem without unfairly prejudicing beneficiaries. Clear organization of evidence and persuasive legal argumentation help the judge understand the requested change and its rationale, increasing the likelihood of a well-reasoned order that the trustee can implement confidently.
Once the court issues an order approving the modification, trustees must update trust records, distribute assets according to the revised terms, and ensure all administrative steps comply with the order. This may include recording updated asset ownership, notifying financial institutions, and updating related documents like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and beneficiary designations. Proper implementation preserves the integrity of the trust and reduces the chances of further disputes by making the court-approved terms clear and actionable.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate or superior court asking permission to change one or more trust provisions when informal amendment is not possible or appropriate. Reasons for a petition include correcting errors, clarifying ambiguous language, adjusting trustee powers, or adapting trust terms to reflect changed circumstances. The petition must describe the requested change, provide supporting factual evidence, and demonstrate why judicial approval is necessary to resolve the issue. Courts evaluate the proposed amendment against the settlor’s intent and the rights of beneficiaries before issuing an order. When a petition is appropriate, it can provide a definitive, enforceable resolution that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on going forward. The court’s order becomes part of the official record and reduces the risk of future disputes, provided the petition is supported by clear documentation. While some petitions proceed without opposition, others may involve objections that require hearings and responsive evidence. Careful preparation and timely notice to interested parties increase the likelihood of an efficient outcome.
A settlor who has capacity may be able to amend a revocable trust directly through an amendment or restatement without court involvement, provided the trust document grants amendment authority and the settlor can sign the necessary documents. Informal amendments are often the quickest route when the settlor is available and competent to act. However, when the settlor lacks capacity, is deceased, or when beneficiaries contest an amendment, a court petition may be required to effect the change legally and securely. Even when direct amendment is possible, there are circumstances where a petition is preferable. For example, if a beneficiary disputes the validity of an amendment, or if asset titles or beneficiary designations make informal changes risky, a court-supervised modification can create a clear, enforceable resolution. Legal guidance helps determine whether direct amendment or a petition is the better option for your situation.
California probate rules require notice to those individuals and entities with a legally protectable interest in the trust, which commonly includes current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes creditors or other parties affected by the proposed change. The exact list of required recipients depends on the trust’s terms and the nature of the modification requested. Proper service of notice is essential to ensure the court has jurisdiction to act and to provide interested parties an opportunity to object or participate in resolving the matter. Failure to provide required notice can delay proceedings or result in procedural challenges that undermine the petition. Our office helps prepare thorough service lists, follows statutory timelines for notice, and files proofs of service with the court. This attention to detail reduces the risk of procedural defects and promotes a smoother path to final resolution.
Timing for trust modification petitions varies depending on whether the petition is contested, the court’s calendar, and the complexity of the factual record. Uncontested petitions that are well-documented and supported by beneficiary agreement can often be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a matter of weeks to a few months. Contested matters that require hearings, additional declarations, or evidentiary proceedings typically take longer, potentially several months or more depending on court availability and the need for discovery or expert testimony. Local factors in Los Angeles County, such as court backlog and scheduling constraints, also influence the timeline. Early preparation, clear documentation, and attempts to resolve disputes informally can shorten the process. We work with clients to set realistic expectations and to move petitions along efficiently through careful drafting and proactive case management.
Key evidence often includes the trust instrument and any prior drafts or amendments, contemporaneous writings that indicate the settlor’s intent, and declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s wishes or capacity. Medical records or physician declarations may be necessary when capacity is at issue. Detailed documentation of the factual changes prompting the modification—such as changes in asset ownership or family circumstances—also helps the court evaluate the petition’s merits. Organized, well-presented evidence increases the chance of a favorable outcome and can reduce the risk of objections gaining traction. Courts look for a coherent narrative tied to documents or witness statements that support the proposed change. Preparing a clear evidentiary package and proposed findings helps the judge understand both the requested modification and the rationale for granting it.
Yes, beneficiaries may object to a proposed trust modification if they believe the change harms their interests or if they dispute the factual basis for the petition. Objections can lead to hearings where both sides present evidence and arguments. When objections arise, courts weigh the settlor’s intent, the proposed modification’s reasonableness, and any potential prejudice to beneficiaries prior to issuing an order. Objections may result in negotiation, mediated settlement, or a contested hearing to resolve the dispute. Early, transparent communication and efforts to resolve disagreements can reduce the likelihood and severity of contested proceedings. Where negotiation is possible, it often produces faster and less costly outcomes. When objections cannot be resolved, thorough preparation for hearing, including strong evidentiary support, is essential to persuasively address opposing claims and obtain an enforceable court ruling.
A trust modification petition may interact with other estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and beneficiary designations, so it is important to review the entire estate plan together. Court-approved changes to trust terms may necessitate updates to related documents to ensure consistency. For example, if a trust distribution scheme changes, corresponding provisions in a pour-over will or beneficiary designations should be reviewed to avoid future conflicts during administration. Coordinating updates across all estate planning documents promotes coherence and prevents inconsistent instructions that could confuse trustees or financial institutions. We help clients assess and update related instruments after a court order to ensure the whole plan functions as intended, reducing the chance of future disputes and ensuring beneficiaries receive benefits as the settlor intended.
If the court denies a trust modification petition, parties may need to consider alternative legal strategies, which could include revising the proposed changes, gathering additional evidence, or pursuing negotiated settlement with beneficiaries. The denial may identify evidentiary or legal shortcomings that can be addressed in a subsequent filing. In some cases, the petitioner and interested parties can discuss limited alternatives that achieve similar goals without further litigation, such as restructuring arrangements among beneficiaries or updating related estate planning documents when the settlor is able to act. A denial can also signal the need for more comprehensive planning or a different approach to resolving conflicts. Reviewing the court’s reasons and consulting on next steps helps determine whether refiling, settlement, or other measures are appropriate to protect client interests and move toward an acceptable resolution.
Alternatives to filing a trust modification petition include seeking voluntary agreement among beneficiaries, pursuing mediation, or executing a direct amendment or restatement if the settlor has capacity to sign changes. Negotiation and mediation often resolve disputes without formal court involvement, saving time and expense while preserving family relationships. When parties can reach an agreement, they may submit a stipulated order to the court that reflects the compromise and avoids a contested hearing. However, when the settlor lacks capacity, beneficiaries disagree, or the legal issue cannot be solved informally, a court petition may be the safest and most durable path. Our approach includes evaluating and pursuing settlement options where feasible, while preparing a strong petition when court action is necessary to secure a binding solution.
Our firm assists clients with every aspect of a trust modification petition, from initial evaluation to preparing petitions, serving notice, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. We help assemble the factual and documentary evidence that supports the requested change, draft precise proposed language, and coordinate notice and service to beneficiaries and trustees. This comprehensive support helps reduce procedural errors and positions the petition for effective resolution in Los Angeles County courts. We also explore alternatives such as negotiation or mediation when appropriate, and we provide guidance on updating related estate planning documents after a court order. For clients in Agoura Hills and beyond, we aim to deliver practical solutions that resolve issues efficiently while protecting the settlor’s objectives and the interests of beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas