If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Artesia, understanding the legal options and local procedures can help you make informed decisions that protect your wishes and your family. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with requests to modify or adjust trust terms, whether to reflect changed circumstances, correct drafting errors, or respond to changes in family dynamics. This introduction outlines the purpose and scope of trust modification petitions, what to expect during the process, and how a thoughtful approach can preserve estate planning goals while complying with California law and Los Angeles County procedures.
Modifying a trust in California often requires careful planning to avoid unintended consequences and to ensure the revised terms are enforceable. A trust modification petition may be appropriate where parties seek court approval for changes to a revocable or irrevocable trust, or to address ambiguities, trustee succession, or tax and creditor concerns. This paragraph provides context about common triggers for modification petitions, the importance of clear documentation, and how local filing practices in Artesia and Los Angeles County shape the timeline. Call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to discuss whether a petition fits your situation.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can preserve family intentions, update beneficiary designations, and correct administrative or drafting issues that might otherwise cause disputes. In many cases, court authorization provides a clear legal record that reduces the risk of later challenges from beneficiaries or creditors. For people in Artesia and throughout Los Angeles County, the benefit of a formal petition is having a documented resolution that courts, banks, and other institutions will recognize. A well-managed process can also limit delays in trust administration, protect assets for intended beneficiaries, and reduce the likelihood of costly litigation down the road.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Artesia and across California with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. The firm handles trust modification petitions, will drafting, powers of attorney, health care directives, and related documents like pour-over wills and trust certifications. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust instruments, clear communication with clients and beneficiaries, and practical strategies that align with California statutes. We assist with petition preparation, court filings, and negotiations among interested parties to reach resolutions that uphold client goals while respecting statutory requirements and local court practices.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when private amendment is not possible or when a dispute or ambiguity exists. Reasons for filing include correcting a drafting error, clarifying trustee powers, updating beneficiary designations, or reconciling changes in circumstances that affect the trustor’s intent. In California, the probate courts in Los Angeles County handle these matters under statutory and case law guidance. Understanding what the petition must show and which parties should be notified helps streamline the court process and reduce friction among interested persons.
Filing a petition requires attention to procedural details, including identifying all interested persons, attaching relevant trust documents, and explaining the factual and legal basis for the requested modification. Courts will consider the trust’s language, the trustor’s intent when the trust was created, and any subsequent conduct that indicates changed intent. In some instances, the parties can reach a stipulated modification without contested proceedings; in others, the court may need to resolve disputes about capacity, undue influence, or interpretation. Timely notice, accurate filings, and clear evidence are essential for successful outcomes.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to authorize changes to a trust’s terms or administration when the existing document cannot be changed privately or when disagreements arise. The petition should explain why the change is necessary, detail the specific amendments sought, and show how the proposed change aligns with the trustor’s intent and legal standards. Common grounds include correcting operative errors, changing trustee powers, resolving ambiguous provisions, or addressing tax and creditor implications. The court evaluates petitions under California law and seeks outcomes that respect the trustor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested relief, supporting facts, citation of applicable statutory or case law, and evidence such as the original trust, amendments, and relevant communications. The process typically involves preparing the petition, serving notice on all interested parties, filing with the probate court in Los Angeles County, and attending hearings as required. In some matters, parties negotiate stipulations to resolve issues without prolonged litigation. Accurate pleadings, coordinated service of process, and readiness to present evidence at hearing help move the case toward a practicable resolution.
Familiarity with common terms helps you follow the petition process. This glossary defines words and roles frequently encountered during trust modification matters in California, including parties to the trust, types of trusts, and legal instruments that may affect a modification petition. Understanding these terms makes it easier to review documents, communicate with counsel, and participate effectively in negotiations or court proceedings. Below are clear definitions of terms used throughout this guide and during the petition process to help you prepare and respond appropriately.
Trustor refers to the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The trustor sets the terms, appoints a trustee, and designates beneficiaries, and their intent is central to decisions about modifying a trust. When the trustor is alive, many amendments can be made privately if the trust terms allow; after incapacity or death, court petitions may be necessary to alter trust provisions. Courts give significant weight to evidence of the trustor’s intent, including the original document, later declarations, and surrounding circumstances that demonstrate the desired outcome.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s provisions for the benefit of beneficiaries. The trustee’s duties include loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and trustees may have statutory obligations under California law. When a proposed modification affects trustee powers or succession, the court examines whether the change is necessary and whether it serves the trustor’s intent and beneficiaries’ interests. Trustees often play a central role in modification petitions, either as petitioners or respondents, depending on the circumstances.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to receive benefits under a trust, and they hold rights that the court will consider before approving any modification. Beneficiaries must typically be notified of petitions and given an opportunity to object, particularly when a change may affect their distributions or legal position. The court balances beneficiaries’ interests with the trustor’s intent and may require procedures to protect those interests, including accountings or hearings. Clear notice and communication with beneficiaries often reduce disputes and facilitate agreed resolutions.
A Heggstad petition addresses assets that were intended to be held in a trust but were never formally transferred, asking the court to recognize the trust’s beneficial ownership. This type of petition can be relevant when assets were left in the decedent’s name but were meant to fund the trust, and clarification is needed to ensure proper administration. Heggstad petitions, trust certification, and pour-over wills are related tools in the estate planning toolkit that help align assets with the trustor’s plan and resolve technical defects without disturbing substantive distribution intentions.
When considering changes to a trust, several options may be available depending on the trust’s terms, the trustor’s capacity, and the level of agreement among interested parties. Private amendment works when the trustor is competent and the trust allows modifications without court involvement. An agreed petition or settlement can accomplish modifications when beneficiaries and trustees consent. A court petition becomes necessary when agreement is lacking, the trustor is incapacitated or deceased, or legal defects must be corrected. Evaluating risks and benefits of each path helps determine the most appropriate approach for your circumstances.
If the trustor retains capacity and the trust document expressly allows amendments without court involvement, a direct amendment can be the least disruptive option. This approach is appropriate when the trustor wishes to update beneficiary designations, change trustee appointments, or clarify distribution provisions and can sign an amendment that complies with the trust’s formalities. Private amendments avoid court fees and reduce delays, but require careful drafting and execution to prevent ambiguity and ensure that third parties like banks and title companies will accept the revised document.
When all interested parties, including beneficiaries and trustees, agree to a modification, they can sometimes execute a written agreement or file a stipulated petition to effect the change without contested litigation. An agreed resolution can streamline the process, lower costs, and preserve family relationships. The agreement should be documented in writing and may still require court approval in certain circumstances, especially where independent oversight is necessary to protect minor or incapacitated beneficiaries. Full disclosure and clear documentation of consent are essential for this approach.
A formal petition is often needed when beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions, when there are allegations of undue influence or incapacity, or when the trust contains ambiguities that cannot be resolved through private amendment. In those situations, the court provides a forum for evidence and legal argument that clarifies rights and obligations. A well-prepared petition frames the dispute, presents factual support, and proposes a remedy that aligns with the trustor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ legal interests.
When assets were intended to fund a trust but were not properly transferred, or when title issues complicate administration, a petition such as a Heggstad action or declaration may be necessary to correct the record. These matters can affect the trust’s ability to carry out its terms and may require the court to declare beneficial ownership or direct corrective measures. Court intervention clarifies property status, enables proper asset distribution, and reduces the risk of later litigation over ownership or misadministration.
A comprehensive approach that uses a petition and court supervision can provide a durable resolution when private amendment is not feasible or when disputes exist among interested persons. Court orders create an authoritative record accepted by financial institutions and third parties, reducing the chance of future challenges. Comprehensive handling also allows for thorough review of the trust instrument, proper notice to all parties, and structured hearings that weigh evidence and legal standards. For complex situations, this approach can resolve multiple related issues in a single proceeding, saving time and uncertainty in the long term.
In addition to formal resolution, a court-managed process can protect vulnerable beneficiaries by ensuring appropriate oversight and judicial review. The process clarifies trustee duties and may authorize corrective actions that restore the trust’s intended operation. While court involvement can involve costs and procedural steps, the certainty of a court order often outweighs the expense, particularly when property titles, tax considerations, or contested beneficiary rights are at stake. The result is greater predictability for administration and for beneficiaries expecting distributions according to the trustor’s plan.
A key advantage of a court-authorized modification is finality: orders issued by the probate court provide definitive guidance for trustees and institutions, reducing the risk of future disputes over the same matters. Financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties typically accept court orders as authoritative, which can prevent administrative delays in distributing assets. This reliability is particularly important when multiple parties or complex assets are involved, since the court’s ruling clarifies responsibilities and enables trustees to act with confidence in carrying out the trust’s terms.
Court involvement provides built-in protections for beneficiaries who may be minors, incapacitated, or otherwise unable to safeguard their own interests. The probate process includes notice requirements and opportunities for representation or intervention that help ensure those beneficiaries receive appropriate consideration. Judges can order accountings, appoint guardians or conservators where needed, and put safeguards in place for ongoing administration. These mechanisms reduce the risk of mismanagement or disputes that could deplete trust assets or undermine the trustor’s intentions over time.
Before filing any petition, collect the original trust instrument, all amendments, beneficiary designations, and any documents related to asset transfers. Include title documents, deeds, account statements, and correspondence that show the trustor’s intent or evidence of attempted transfers. These records form the factual backbone of a petition and make it easier to identify whether a private amendment, agreed resolution, or formal court petition is required. Proper documentation reduces delay and strengthens your position when communicating with other interested persons and the probate court.
When parties are willing to cooperate, an agreed modification or stipulated petition can save time and costs compared to contested proceedings. Mediation or facilitated negotiation can resolve many disagreements about trustee powers, beneficiary distributions, or drafting errors. Even when court involvement remains necessary for formality or enforcement, presenting a united plan to the court often streamlines approval. Evaluate the benefits of a negotiated outcome, document all agreements carefully, and ensure that any settlement is reflected in proper legal instruments or court orders to avoid future challenges.
Consider a petition if the trust contains ambiguous language that affects distributions, if assets intended for the trust were not properly transferred, or if there are changes in family circumstances that the original instrument does not address. Examples include remarriage, births, deaths, beneficiary incapacity, or relocation that affects fiduciary administration. A petition can also be necessary when a trustee’s role needs to be clarified or altered to allow effective administration. Assessing the legal and practical consequences of proposed changes helps determine whether a petition is the best course of action.
You should also consider a formal petition when there are concerns about potential challenges from creditors, tax consequences that require court oversight, or when asset title issues prevent the trustee from carrying out trust instructions. In many cases, filing a petition prevents prolonged uncertainty by providing a definitive court order that third parties will accept. Even when a private amendment seems possible, involving the court may be prudent to ensure broad acceptance by banks, retirement plan administrators, and title companies, especially in Los Angeles County.
Typical circumstances include incomplete funding of a trust, disputes over interpretation of terms, changes in the trustor’s family status, trustee incapacity or misconduct, and tax or creditor issues affecting administration. Problems often surface when assets remain in the decedent’s name, when a new beneficiary claim arises, or when state law changes affect trust administration. A petition can clarify ownership, confirm the trustor’s intent, and authorize corrective actions to allow the trustee to manage and distribute assets in accordance with the plan.
When a trustor intended assets to be held in trust but some assets were not retitled or transferred, a petition may be necessary to have the court recognize the trust’s beneficial ownership. This situation can delay distribution and administration and may require a Heggstad petition or other remedial filing to clarify ownership for banks, title companies, and tax authorities. Properly documenting the intent and the circumstances of failed transfers helps the court resolve these issues and permits the trustee to proceed with administration.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about interpretation, distributions, or trustee duties, a petition provides a formal mechanism for resolving disputes through legal arguments and evidence. The court evaluates the trust’s language and surrounding facts to reach a determination that balances the trustor’s intent with beneficiaries’ rights. Disputes can arise over perceived unfairness, removed or replaced trustees, or claims of undue influence, and a judicial resolution can prevent prolonged conflict and uncertainty in trust administration.
Significant life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or disability can alter the circumstances under which a trust was created, prompting requests for modification. Changes in tax law, relocation of trust assets, or discovery of drafting errors may also necessitate judicial intervention to ensure the trust functions as intended. A petition allows the court to consider updated facts and approve adjustments that align with what the trustor would likely have wanted under the new circumstances.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local guidance for residents of Artesia and nearby communities in Los Angeles County who face trust modification questions. We explain options, help gather documentation, and prepare petitions or agreements that reflect your goals. Our team assists with notices, court filings, and representation at hearings when necessary, and works to keep beneficiaries informed during the process. We provide practical advice tailored to California probate procedures and local courthouse practices to reduce delays and help achieve a clear resolution.
Selecting a law firm to handle a trust modification petition means choosing a team familiar with California probate procedures and Los Angeles County practices. We guide clients through the steps of preparing petitions, identifying interested parties, and providing evidence of the trustor’s intent. Our practice emphasizes clear written pleadings, timely service of notice, and practical courtroom presentation, all intended to support a favorable outcome. We focus on resolving issues efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and the trust’s intended purpose.
Our attorneys help clients weigh the pros and cons of private amendment, stipulated agreements, and formal petitions, recommending the path that best fits the facts and legal constraints. We handle related documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, powers of attorney, and health care directives to create a cohesive estate plan. Clients benefit from strategic planning that addresses both immediate concerns and long-term administration needs, reducing the chance of future disputes and ensuring that documents function as intended.
We also assist in coordinating with financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties to implement court orders or trust amendments in practice. Effective implementation requires careful attention to documentation and communication with those who control trust assets. By preparing complete records and liaising with third parties, the firm helps trustees fulfill their duties and ensures beneficiaries receive their intended distributions. Our objective is to make the process as manageable and predictable as possible for everyone involved.
Our process begins with a document review and intake to identify the trust’s provisions, any attempted amendments, and the identities of interested persons. We then recommend whether a private amendment, stipulated agreement, or court petition is appropriate and outline the necessary steps. If a petition is needed, we prepare pleadings, coordinate service, file with the Los Angeles County probate court, and manage hearings. Throughout the process we update clients, assist with negotiations where possible, and work to secure a clear written order that third parties will accept.
The first step is to assess the trust instrument and collect all relevant documents, including deeds, account statements, prior amendments, and correspondence related to the trustor’s intent. This factual groundwork identifies gaps or defects that may require correction and reveals parties with potential interests. A thorough assessment clarifies whether an amendment can be executed privately or whether a court petition is necessary, and enables us to craft a factual and legal strategy tailored to the complexity of the matter and the needs of the beneficiaries.
We carefully review the trust’s language, any previous amendments, and asset titles to determine whether property was properly transferred into the trust. This review highlights technical defects such as assets left in the decedent’s name, mismatched beneficiary designations, or ambiguous clauses that can hinder administration. Identifying these issues early helps determine whether a corrective petition, such as a Heggstad filing, is necessary and informs the scope of relief to request from the court to achieve the trustor’s intended distribution of assets.
Identifying all interested persons—trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and any guardians or conservators—is essential to ensure proper notice and avoid procedural challenges. We evaluate relationships, potential conflicts, and any prior communications that may affect willingness to agree to changes. Early identification enables targeted outreach to resolve disputes where possible, and it ensures the petition includes accurate service information and a plan for addressing objections that may arise during the court process.
If the assessment indicates court intervention is necessary, we prepare a petition that sets forth the requested modifications, factual support, and legal basis under California law. The filing package includes the trust instrument and any relevant exhibits, and it complies with Los Angeles County probate court rules. Accurate and persuasive pleadings help the court understand the need for relief and streamline subsequent proceedings. We handle service requirements and coordinate filings to move the matter forward promptly.
Drafting a petition involves clear statements of the relief sought, precise references to the trust provisions at issue, and presentation of supporting facts and evidence, such as affidavits or declarations. Exhibits like the original trust, amendments, deeds, and financial records are attached to substantiate claims. Clear organization and thorough documentation reduce the likelihood of delays and help the court evaluate the matter efficiently, whether the petition is contested or settled by stipulation of the parties.
Properly serving notice on beneficiaries and other interested persons is a procedural requirement and protects the finality of the court’s decision. We prepare and execute service documents in compliance with statutory rules, ensuring that recipients receive clear information about the petition and the opportunity to respond. Where parties reside out of state or cannot be located, alternative service methods may be required, and we take steps to meet court standards for notice so the proceedings remain valid and enforceable.
After filing, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition, hear objections, and issue an order granting, denying, or modifying the requested relief. We prepare evidence, present arguments, and work to achieve orders that clearly direct trustees and third parties to act. Once an order is entered, our team assists in implementing the court’s directives, including updating titles, communicating with financial institutions, and preparing any follow-up filings needed to complete the trust administration process in accordance with the court’s instructions.
At hearing, presenting coherent factual evidence and legal argument helps the judge determine whether the requested modification aligns with the trustor’s intent and legal standards. This may involve testimony, declarations from witnesses, and documentary proof such as communications or financial records. Clear presentation of facts and a concise explanation of the relief sought assist the court in making an informed decision. Well-prepared hearings increase the likelihood of an order that resolves the issues with minimal further litigation.
After the court issues an order, the trustee must carry out the directives to update trust records, retitle assets if required, and distribute property according to the modified terms. We help coordinate with banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to implement changes and secure compliance with the court’s order. This implementation phase ensures the trust functions as intended and that beneficiaries receive their distributions, while also closing any remaining administrative matters to conclude the estate planning process.
A trust modification petition is a legal request submitted to the probate court to change a trust’s terms or administration when private amendment is not possible or when there is disagreement among interested persons. It typically explains the requested modifications, attaches the original trust and supporting documents, and shows why the court should approve the change under California law. Courts evaluate the trustor’s intent, the trust language, and supporting evidence to determine whether the requested relief is appropriate, balancing beneficiaries’ interests with the trust’s purposes. You may need a petition when the trustor is incapacitated or deceased, when parties disagree about interpretation, or when technical defects such as untransferred assets prevent proper administration. Petitions can also address trustee succession, correct drafting errors, or clarify powers. Filing a petition provides a formal, enforceable resolution, accepted by banks and title companies, and helps avoid ongoing disputes by creating a judicially approved directive for trustees and beneficiaries to follow.
Determining whether a private amendment suffices depends on the trust’s amendment provisions and the trustor’s capacity. If the trust allows the trustor to amend during life and the trustor is competent, a direct amendment may be the simplest route. When all interested parties agree, a written settlement or stipulated petition can often effect changes without contested litigation. These non‑litigation paths avoid probate court fees and public proceedings if the parties can reach a clear, documented agreement. A court petition becomes necessary when the trustor lacks capacity, when parties cannot agree on changes, or when legal defects prevent private amendment, such as assets never transferred into the trust. In such cases the petition process provides a structured forum for resolving disputes and obtaining a binding court order that third parties will accept, which can be essential when title or creditor issues complicate the situation.
California law requires that all interested persons receive notice of a petition affecting a trust. Interested persons include beneficiaries, trustees, heirs, and sometimes creditors or persons named in related documents like powers of attorney or wills. Proper notice ensures those parties have an opportunity to respond or object, and failure to serve notice correctly can lead to procedural delays or challenges to the court’s order. Identifying every interested person at the outset prevents problems later in the process. Service often must follow statutory requirements for method and timing, which may include personal service, mail, or substituted service in certain circumstances. When people are out of state or cannot be located, courts permit alternative methods if due diligence is shown. We assist in preparing and executing notice to satisfy the Los Angeles County probate court’s standards and protect the validity of the proceeding.
Transferring assets into a trust after the trustor’s death can be complicated, but certain petitions, including Heggstad actions, can ask the court to recognize assets as trust property if evidence shows they were intended to be held in trust. When title to assets remains in the decedent’s name, courts can review communications, intent, and the estate plan to determine whether those assets should be treated as trust property. Successful petitions clarify ownership so trustees can administer assets according to the trust’s terms. In other situations, assets may pass to beneficiaries via probate if they were never part of the trust, or trustees may need to work with banks and title companies to retitle assets consistent with a court order. Proper documentation and timely petitions reduce administrative delays and help ensure distributions align with the trustor’s overall estate plan.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets, though still titled in the decedent’s name, are nonetheless trust assets because they were intended to be transferred into the trust. This type of filing often arises when the creator of the trust took steps indicating intent to fund the trust but failed to complete title transfers. The court examines evidence such as deeds, account forms, and communications showing intent, and may declare that the trust is the beneficial owner of those assets. Heggstad petitions differ from ordinary modification petitions because they focus on ownership and funding rather than altering trust terms. While a modification petition seeks changes to the trust’s provisions or administration, a Heggstad action addresses whether assets should be administered under the trust’s directions, enabling trustees to distribute or manage property consistent with the trustor’s plan.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether the matter is contested. Simple agreed petitions or stipulated modifications can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested petitions involving disputes, complex title issues, or multiple hearings can take many months or longer. Local courthouse schedules and the need for discovery or additional evidence can extend the timeline, so it is prudent to plan for variable durations. Prompt, thorough preparation reduces delays: gathering documents, identifying interested persons, and communicating with potential objectors often speeds resolution. When a hearing is scheduled, the court’s calendar affects final timing, and follow-up implementation steps—such as retitling assets—may add further time. We help clients set expectations and work to move matters forward efficiently within Los Angeles County procedures.
Court-ordered modifications can affect creditor claims and tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and timing relative to the trustor’s death. Courts may consider creditor rights in probate-related matters and may require steps to address claims before approving certain distributions. Additionally, some modifications could have estate or income tax implications if they change ownership or the timing of transfers, so understanding potential financial impacts is important before seeking relief. When tax or creditor exposure is possible, the petition can propose measures to protect interested parties, such as reserving funds to satisfy claims or structuring modifications to minimize tax impact. Coordination with tax advisors and careful drafting of petitions helps ensure court-approved changes do not create unintended obligations or risks for beneficiaries and trustees.
Beneficiaries generally have the right to object to a proposed modification by filing a response with the court and presenting evidence or legal arguments against the change. The court will consider objections in light of the trust’s language, the trustor’s intent, and the equities involved. An objection can lead to negotiation, mediation, or a contested hearing where the judge decides whether the requested modification should be approved and under what terms. Early outreach and transparent information sharing can reduce adversarial responses; sometimes objections arise from misunderstandings that are resolvable through dialogue or limited modifications. When objections persist, the court process provides a neutral forum to evaluate the merits of competing positions and issue an enforceable decision that clarifies rights and obligations.
Trustees are generally required to comply with valid court orders and should implement directives promptly to avoid liability for failure to follow the court’s instructions. After an order is entered, trustees should update trust records, retitle assets if required, and carry out distributions as set forth by the court. Acting in accordance with a court order provides trustees with legal protection when dealing with banks, title companies, and other third parties who rely on judicial determinations. If compliance raises practical challenges, trustees should seek clarification or follow-up orders rather than unilaterally deviating from the court’s directives. When third parties resist implementing an order, trustees may request the court’s assistance to enforce compliance and ensure that actions taken conform to the modified trust terms and the judge’s instructions.
Before seeking a trust modification petition, gather the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and communications that reflect the trustor’s intent. Create a list of interested persons, including beneficiaries, trustees, and heirs, with updated contact information. Having comprehensive documentation and a clear understanding of the issues at hand enables efficient case assessment and supports a well-founded petition if court action is necessary. It is also helpful to consider whether parties might agree to a negotiated resolution and to be prepared to disclose relevant facts to facilitate settlement. Understanding potential title issues, tax considerations, and creditor exposures ahead of filing helps shape the petition and avoids surprises during the probate process. Thoughtful preparation makes the process more predictable and increases the chances of obtaining a practical, enforceable outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas