A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in court to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances, relationships, or assets have shifted since the trust was created. People pursue a modification when life events such as a remarriage, divorce, major financial changes, the need to correct drafting mistakes, or a change in the settlor’s intentions require adjustments. For residents of Boyle Heights and surrounding Los Angeles communities, a trust modification petition can preserve family wealth, clarify trustee duties, and reflect current wishes while maintaining continuity within estate plans. We guide clients through assessing options and preparing focused petitions that reflect their goals and comply with California statutes.
When a trust no longer reflects the grantor’s intentions or the realities of family and financial life, a properly drafted petition can bring the trust back in line with those intentions. The process involves evaluating the original trust language, identifying permissible methods for modification under California law, and preparing court filings that explain the requested changes. For many clients, filing a petition helps avoid downstream disputes and provides a clear path forward for trustees and beneficiaries. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication with all involved parties when appropriate, and measured advocacy in court to seek an outcome that honors the grantor’s updated wishes.
Bringing a trust up to date through a modification petition can prevent confusion, reduce the risk of contested administration, and ensure that asset management aligns with present intentions. A successful modification can correct ambiguities, realign distributions, change trustee appointments, and address changes in financial circumstances without undoing the benefits of a trust structure. For families in Boyle Heights, clear and current estate planning documents reduce emotional strain and legal uncertainty after a major life event. The process also offers an opportunity to confirm tax considerations and beneficiary needs while maintaining orderly administration of trust assets under California law.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California with a focus on estate planning matters including trust modifications, wills, powers of attorney, and related petitions. The firm provides hands-on guidance in preparing petitions, navigating probate court procedures, and coordinating with trustees and beneficiaries to resolve disputes and implement desired changes. Clients benefit from a practical approach that emphasizes careful document analysis, clear explanations of legal options, and diligent representation at hearings when necessary. Our team aims to keep the process as streamlined and transparent as possible for families in Boyle Heights and across Los Angeles County.
A trust modification petition is a formal court action that requests changes to an existing trust instrument, which may be necessary when the original terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions or when circumstances make the original provisions impractical. In California, the law allows certain modifications through court petitions when parties meet statutory standards, when all interested parties consent, or when the trust document provides a process for amendment. The petition explains the reasons for the change, cites legal authority, and proposes amended terms or clarifications. The court evaluates the petition in light of the settlor’s intent, beneficiary interests, and any potential conflicts among parties.
The outcome of a petition can range from a minor clarifying amendment to a substantive change in distributions, trustee powers, or trust administration. The court will consider whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and whether it protects beneficiaries’ rights. Parties may resolve many matters by agreement prior to or during court proceedings, but contested issues require careful briefing and presentation. A thoughtful petition balances legal argument with factual clarification of why the change is necessary or appropriate, and it accounts for potential concerns about unintended consequences for tax treatment, creditor claims, or beneficiary expectations.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing seeking a court order to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust. This mechanism is used when the trust document does not provide an effective method to address changed circumstances or when all interested parties do not or cannot consent outside of court. Grounds for a petition include rectifying errors, adjusting distributions, removing or replacing trustees, and clarifying ambiguous language. The petition sets forth supporting facts, references the trust instrument, and requests specific relief. The court’s role is to determine whether the requested changes are lawful and consistent with the trust’s intent and applicable California statutes.
Filing a trust modification petition typically requires a clear statement of the trust’s provisions at issue, factual context explaining why a change is needed, identification of interested parties, and a proposed form of order or amended trust terms. Supporting documentation may include the original trust document, any relevant amendments, and evidence such as correspondence or financial records that bear on the settlor’s intent. The process generally involves serving notice to beneficiaries and interested persons, responding to objections, and, when agreement cannot be reached, presenting the petition in court. The judge then evaluates whether the requested modification adheres to statutory requirements and the settlor’s likely intent.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the legal process and participate effectively. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, Heggstad petition, and pour-over will often appear in pleadings and communications. Each term carries a specific role in trust law: the settlor creates the trust, the trustee manages trust assets, and beneficiaries receive benefits. Familiarity with these definitions supports clearer discussions about proposed changes, potential objections, and the likely practical impact of amendments on estate administration and family planning goals.
A settlor is the person who creates and funds a trust, defining the terms under which assets are held and managed. The settlor’s intent, as reflected in the trust document and underlying circumstances, guides judicial decisions in modification proceedings. When considering a petition, courts examine evidence of the settlor’s purpose and any later statements or actions that clarify their wishes. Recognizing the settlor’s desired outcomes is essential to crafting changes that preserve the trust’s core objectives while addressing evolved needs or correcting errors in drafting or administration.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize assets that were intended to be part of a trust even though title to those assets was not formally transferred into the trust prior to the settlor’s death. Such petitions typically show clear and convincing evidence that the settlor intended the assets to be governed by the trust. In California, courts may accept declarations, correspondence, or other proof indicating the settlor’s plan to include particular property. Resolving these matters helps ensure that assets are administered according to the overall estate plan rather than becoming subject to probate.
A trustee is the individual or institution appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the settlor’s instructions. Trustee duties include investing assets prudently, making distributions according to the trust terms, keeping beneficiaries informed, and avoiding conflicts of interest. When a petition seeks to modify trustee powers or remove a trustee, the court examines whether the requested change better serves the trust’s purpose and the beneficiaries’ interests. Changes to trustee responsibilities require careful drafting to ensure clarity in ongoing administration and legal compliance.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets that remain outside of a trust into the trust at the time of the grantor’s death. This mechanism provides a safety net ensuring that assets not formally retitled during the grantor’s lifetime pass into the trust for distribution according to its terms. In the context of trust modifications, a pour-over will remains relevant because the combination of trust and will determines overall estate distribution, and petitions may sometimes address issues where assets were meant to be included in the trust but were handled through a will instead.
When a trust requires change, clients may consider informal agreement among interested parties, formal amendment methods provided by the trust instrument, or a court petition. Voluntary agreement can be efficient when all beneficiaries and trustees concur and the trust allows amendment without court involvement. Where unilateral authority is limited or disputes exist, a petition offers a judicial path to resolve conflicting interests. Each route carries different timelines, costs, and levels of scrutiny. Evaluating the nature of the changes sought, the relationships among involved parties, and the potential for disagreements helps determine the most appropriate approach in Boyle Heights and elsewhere in California.
A limited amendment or written agreement is often adequate when all beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties agree to a proposed change and the trust document permits such amendments without court involvement. This path is efficient and preserves privacy, avoiding public court records. The parties must ensure that any amendments comply with the trust’s amendment provisions and that documentation is properly executed and recorded where necessary to reflect the revised terms. Legal review is beneficial to confirm that the agreed changes are valid and do not create unintended gaps in the estate plan.
When the needed changes are technical in nature, such as correcting a scrivener’s error, clarifying ambiguous language, or updating contact information for trustees and beneficiaries, a limited approach may suffice. Simple corrections that do not alter substantive beneficiary rights or significantly shift control of assets can usually be handled without court intervention, provided the trust allows such corrections. Ensuring that the amendment is well-documented and signed according to the trust’s procedures helps prevent future disputes about the intended terms or administrative authority.
A comprehensive approach, involving court petitions and formal litigation when necessary, becomes important when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes or when the trust instrument lacks a clear amendment mechanism. Disputes can arise over distribution terms, trustee removal, or whether particular assets should be included in the trust. In these situations, a formal petition allows the court to weigh evidence, interpret the settlor’s intent, and issue an order that resolves conflicting claims, thereby providing a stable basis for future administration and reducing the likelihood of ongoing disputes.
When proposed changes substantially alter beneficiary rights, change distribution frameworks, or modify fiduciary powers in ways that could disadvantage certain parties, involving the court ensures that the legal standards for modification are met and that affected parties have notice. A judicial process provides a formal record and enforceable order that clarifies the new terms and preserves enforceability. For many clients, this level of formality reduces future uncertainty and creates a clear path for trustees to administer the trust in accordance with the court-approved changes.
A comprehensive, court-supported modification provides legal certainty and a durable resolution when informal resolution is not feasible. Court approval produces enforceable orders that trustees can rely on without fear of future successful challenges, and it creates a public record clarifying the trust’s new terms. This is particularly valuable in situations involving large estates, complex asset structures, or family dynamics that may produce future disputes. The formal process also ensures that procedural requirements such as notice to interested persons are satisfied, reducing the risk of procedural defects that could undermine the modification.
In addition to certainty, pursuing a comprehensive approach helps preserve the settlor’s intent by placing proposed changes under judicial review, especially when that intent might reasonably be questioned. The court’s involvement can help reconcile competing interpretations and prevent misunderstandings that lead to costly litigation later. For trustees and beneficiaries seeking finality, the order issued after a petition provides an authoritative framework for administration, distribution, and any future trust-related matters, making long-term planning and asset management more predictable.
A court-approved modification yields clarity about rights, powers, and distributions that all parties can rely upon. This legal certainty reduces the chance of future litigation, gives trustees confidence in carrying out duties, and protects beneficiaries from unexpected claims. For families and fiduciaries in Boyle Heights, finality translates into smoother administration and a clearer path to carry out the settlor’s revised intentions. The formal judgment or order becomes a binding record that supports practical decision-making during trust administration and asset distribution.
When disagreements exist among trustees and beneficiaries, a comprehensive approach ensures all voices are heard and the court weighs the competing positions under applicable law. This impartial review can resolve disputes over interpretation, rectify inequitable outcomes, and balance competing interests in a transparent manner. Parties who might otherwise contest administration have the opportunity to present evidence and objections, and the court’s resolution minimizes the risk of lingering conflict that could jeopardize trust administration or prompt future litigation.
Collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, financial records, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intentions makes the petition process smoother. Clear documentation helps demonstrate the need for modification, supports claims about intended distributions, and provides evidence for Heggstad petitions when assets were not retitled. Early organization prevents delays and reduces the likelihood of disputes over missing information. Keeping an itemized list of trust assets and any correspondence with trustees or beneficiaries can be invaluable when drafting pleadings and preparing for hearings.
When proposing modifications, think ahead about how changes will affect beneficiaries, tax implications, asset management, and trustee duties over time. A modification that solves an immediate problem but creates future administrative burdens or tax exposure may not serve family interests in the long run. Discuss potential ripple effects with legal counsel and, when appropriate, financial advisors to ensure the revised terms are durable. A holistic review helps craft changes that align with long-term estate planning goals and reduces the potential for additional petitions later.
Clients typically consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s language no longer matches the settlor’s intentions or when events such as divorce, remarriage, changing financial circumstances, or the need to correct drafting errors arise. The petition route is often necessary when all interested parties do not agree on a proposed change, when the trust lacks an adequate amendment mechanism, or when title to assets requires judicial clarification. Pursuing a petition provides a formal process for resolving disputes and ensures that changes are legally enforceable under California law, protecting both trustees and beneficiaries.
Another reason to seek a petition is when assets that were intended to be part of a trust were not properly titled during the settlor’s lifetime, requiring judicial recognition to effectuate the settlor’s plan. In cases involving complex asset structures, blended families, or potential creditor claims, the clarity and durability of a court-approved modification can be especially valuable. We help clients assess whether a petition is the most effective path to preserve the settlor’s objectives while minimizing the risk of future litigation or administrative confusion.
Typical circumstances prompting petitions include disputes over trustee decisions, changes in beneficiary relationships, the need to add or remove assets, corrections to drafting errors, or situations where the settlor’s intent is in question. Aging, incapacity, remarriage, divorce, or significant changes in asset value can all create conditions where the original trust provisions are no longer appropriate. When title issues or unintended omissions arise, petitions such as Heggstad petitions may be necessary to bring assets into the trust and honor the settlor’s plan.
Significant life events such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of a child, or the death of a beneficiary can prompt the need to alter trust terms. These events may change the equitable distribution of assets or the settlor’s priorities, making previously acceptable provisions outdated. A petition can address shifts in beneficiary designations, adjust distribution timing, or modify trustee powers to reflect the new family landscape. Addressing these issues promptly through an appropriate legal path helps avoid ambiguity and ensures that the trust continues to serve its intended purpose.
Drafting errors, ambiguous language, or omitted provisions discovered after the trust’s execution often necessitate legal action to correct the record. Even minor scrivener’s errors can cause substantial confusion in administration or lead to disputes among beneficiaries and trustees. A petition can clarify intent, correct mistakes, and provide a definitive interpretation that trustees can follow. Establishing a clear and correct document through court proceedings reduces the risk of costly litigation down the road and facilitates orderly trust management.
When assets that the settlor intended to be held by the trust were not retitled or formally transferred, a petition such as a Heggstad petition may be needed to have the court recognize those assets as part of the trust. This situation can arise with real property, investment accounts, or retirement assets that were overlooked or could not be retitled before the settlor’s death. Judicial recognition helps avoid probate for those assets and allows them to be administered in accordance with the trust’s terms, preserving the settlor’s overall estate plan.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation to clients in Boyle Heights and throughout Los Angeles County for trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. Our office assists with reviewing trust instruments, preparing petitions, coordinating notice to interested parties, and advocating before the probate court when necessary. We prioritize clear communication and practical guidance to help clients understand their options and the likely outcomes. Whether the goal is a straightforward amendment or a contested modification, our team aims to guide clients through each step with attention to detail and responsiveness.
Clients turn to our firm for careful analysis of trust documents and strategic planning tailored to their circumstances. We focus on preparing persuasive petitions grounded in relevant statutes, compiling supporting evidence, and managing notice and procedural requirements to minimize delay. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that consider family dynamics, asset management goals, and the need for durable resolutions. For individuals in Boyle Heights and beyond, working with a firm familiar with California probate court procedures helps navigate the process more efficiently and with greater certainty of outcome.
We also place importance on client education and regular communication throughout the process. From initial review to resolution, clients receive clear explanations of legal options and potential consequences, enabling informed decision making. When agreements are possible, we assist in drafting and documenting terms to avoid future disputes. When court action is required, we handle filings, serve interested parties, and represent clients at hearings, aiming to secure an order that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiary interests.
Our office handles a broad spectrum of estate planning documents including revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and related trust instruments. This comprehensive knowledge supports a holistic view of a trust modification’s effects on the overall estate plan. By coordinating with financial advisors and other professionals when appropriate, we help ensure that modifications integrate smoothly into long-term planning and asset management strategies for clients in Boyle Heights and elsewhere in California.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents to identify the precise issues and available solutions. We then advise on whether a voluntary amendment, negotiated agreement, or court petition is the best path and explain potential timelines and costs. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare a detailed pleading, gather supporting evidence, provide required notices, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we maintain clear communication about strategy, developments, and practical implications for trustees and beneficiaries, helping clients pursue a resolution that aligns with their goals.
Step one involves an in-depth review of the trust, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and communications that bear on the settlor’s intent. We assess title issues, beneficiary designations, trustee powers, and any potential grounds for modification or objection. Based on this review, we recommend a strategy that balances the client’s objectives, the likelihood of opposition, and procedural considerations. This planning phase clarifies whether negotiation, informal amendment, or a formal petition will best achieve the desired outcome while minimizing expense and delay.
Collecting the trust document, amendments, wills, deeds, account statements, and any written or recorded indication of intent is essential. We analyze these materials to determine the settlor’s stated wishes, identify ambiguities or drafting errors, and locate assets that might be affected. This factual groundwork supports a persuasive petition and helps anticipate potential challenges. Proper documentation also streamlines the notice process and assists in demonstrating the basis for any requested modifications in court.
Before filing a petition, we often reach out to trustees and beneficiaries to gauge their positions and explore whether an agreed amendment is possible. Early negotiation can narrow disputes and save time and expense by resolving issues without formal litigation. When meaningful agreement is achievable, we help draft and execute the necessary documents to record the amendment. When consensus cannot be reached, the information gathered during outreach informs the petition and supports a targeted court filing.
If a petition is necessary, we prepare a clear pleading that outlines the requested changes, the factual basis for those changes, and the legal grounds supporting the relief sought. This filing includes exhibits such as the trust document, amendments, and any evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent or the necessity of modification. Proper service on all interested parties is essential, and we manage this procedural step to ensure compliance with California rules. The petition frames the issues for the court and sets the stage for subsequent response and hearings.
Factual declarations from trustees, family members, or other witnesses may be necessary to explain the context and support the proposed modification. These statements provide the court with relevant background, demonstrate the settlor’s intent, and detail any administrative or title issues. We prepare and organize these materials to present a coherent narrative that supports the requested relief. Well-prepared evidence can often persuade the court to grant targeted modifications without protracted dispute.
Ensuring that all interested parties receive proper notice of the petition is a critical procedural requirement. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to delays or the need to refile. We handle the service of process, prepare the necessary affidavits or declarations of service, and confirm compliance with local court rules. Attention to these details protects the petition from technical challenges and keeps the matter moving through the court system efficiently.
After filing, the court may set hearings to evaluate the petition, consider objections, and determine whether the requested modification should be granted. Some matters resolve through negotiated stipulations or limited hearings, while contested disputes require fuller presentation of evidence and legal argument. Our representation includes advocacy at hearings, negotiation of settlement terms when appropriate, and preparation of final orders or updated trust documents that reflect the court’s decision. The aim is to achieve a practical and enforceable result that aligns with the settlor’s intended outcomes.
The court may schedule one or more hearings to consider the petition and any objections. In some cases, mediation or settlement negotiations occur to reach a mutually acceptable resolution prior to a contested hearing. Mediation can be a productive avenue for reconciling differing views while avoiding extended litigation. When mediation is unsuccessful or inappropriate, hearings provide an opportunity to present evidence and legal argument to support the requested modification. Our role is to advocate for a resolution that best reflects the settlor’s intentions and the beneficiaries’ interests.
Once the court rules, we prepare the final order and ensure that the trust documents are updated to reflect the approved changes. We assist trustees with implementation steps such as retitling assets if necessary, updating account information, and communicating the new terms to beneficiaries. Properly documenting the court’s order and coordinating the administrative follow-through helps prevent future disputes and promotes orderly trust administration. We work with clients to ensure that practical steps are taken to implement the court-approved modifications.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting that a judge approve changes to the terms or administration of an existing trust. Common reasons for filing include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, changing trustee powers, adjusting beneficiary distributions, or bringing assets into the trust that were not properly retitled. The petition lays out the original trust terms, explains why the modification is necessary or appropriate, and requests specific relief. It also ensures that interested persons receive notice and an opportunity to respond. Filing a petition becomes necessary when the trust document lacks an adequate amendment mechanism, when not all interested parties consent to changes, or when title issues or disputes prevent resolution outside of court. The court evaluates whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent and comply with applicable statutes, and it issues an order that creates a binding record for trustees and beneficiaries to follow. Consulting with counsel early helps determine if a petition is the most practical route.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the matter’s complexity, whether interested parties object, and court scheduling. Simple, uncontested petitions with full agreement can resolve in a few months once filings and required notices are completed. Contested matters, especially those requiring evidentiary hearings or extensive discovery, may take longer, sometimes many months or more. Local court calendars and procedural requirements also affect timing. Early preparation, thorough documentation, and cooperative engagement with other parties can shorten the process when possible. Where disputes exist, mediation or negotiation may produce a settlement that resolves the matter before protracted litigation. Your attorney can provide a more specific estimate based on the facts of your case and the likely responses of other interested persons.
Beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification, and courts take objections into account when considering a petition. An objection does not automatically prevent modification, but it does require the petitioning party to substantiate the requested changes with legal argument and supporting evidence. The judge will weigh the settlor’s intent, any written instructions, and competing claims from beneficiaries to determine whether the modification should be allowed. Where objections are raised, the process may involve hearings, declarations from witnesses, or other proof to clarify factual disputes. In many cases, negotiating with objecting parties or engaging in mediation can narrow issues or lead to a compromise acceptable to all. If a compromise cannot be reached, the court will issue a decision based on the presented evidence and law.
A Heggstad petition requires evidence showing the settlor intended particular assets to be held by the trust even though formal retitling did not occur. Such evidence can include consistent instructions in the trust or related documents, correspondence, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, or testimony reflecting the settlor’s plan. The goal is to show that the lack of retitling was a technical oversight rather than a change in intent. Because the court must be convinced that the assets were meant to be included in the trust, thorough documentation and clear testimony are critical. Declarations from those with knowledge of the settlor’s intentions, financial statements, and any steps that were taken toward transferring assets all strengthen the petition. Proper presentation of facts helps the court apply principles allowing the trust to govern the disputed assets.
Whether modifying a trust triggers tax consequences depends on the nature of the changes and the types of assets involved. Routine clarifications or corrections typically do not alter tax status, but substantive changes affecting ownership, distributions, or control could have implications for estate, gift, or income tax. Changes to irrevocable trusts in particular may carry tax consequences depending on how they affect beneficial interests and control over assets. Because tax issues can be complex, it’s important to review proposed modifications with both legal counsel and a tax advisor when significant assets or retirement accounts are involved. Coordinating legal and tax perspectives helps ensure that modifications achieve intended goals without unexpected tax exposure or negative consequences for beneficiaries.
Yes, a trustee can be removed through court proceedings if sufficient grounds exist, and a trust modification petition can include requests to remove or replace a trustee when appropriate. Courts consider whether removal is in the beneficiaries’ best interests, whether the trustee has breached fiduciary duties, or whether a change is necessary for proper administration. The petition should present evidence supporting the need for removal and propose a replacement or an alternative plan for trusteeship. When seeking removal, demonstrate how the trustee’s conduct or incapacity impedes administration or harms beneficiaries. The court reviews facts and legal standards to determine whether removal and replacement better serve the trust’s purpose. Alternative remedies, such as limiting powers or appointing co-trustees, may also be considered to address concerns while minimizing disruption to trust administration.
Alternatives to filing a petition include pursuing an informal amendment if the trust document allows, negotiating a written agreement among interested parties, or using mediation to resolve disputes. When all beneficiaries and trustees agree, documenting amendments properly can avoid court involvement and preserve privacy. Mediation can be an efficient path to resolution when relationships remain open to negotiation and parties prefer to avoid adversarial proceedings. However, when unanimity is not possible, when title issues exist, or when objections raise legal questions, a petition may be the most reliable method to obtain enforceable changes. An initial evaluation helps determine whether negotiation or a petition is the faster or more durable path for the circumstances at hand.
If assets were not retitled into the trust before the settlor’s death, those assets may be subject to probate unless a Heggstad petition or other legal mechanism demonstrates that the settlor intended those assets to be held by the trust. Filing the appropriate petition can persuade the court to treat those assets as trust property when there is convincing evidence of the settlor’s plan. Successfully bringing such assets into the trust can avoid probate administration and allow the trust to control distribution. Evidence supporting such petitions may include transactional records, beneficiary designations, correspondence, or testimony indicating intent to include the assets in the trust. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the assets should be administered under the trust’s terms. Early identification and documentation of those assets improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary based on the complexity of the issues, whether the matter is contested, and the amount of work required to prepare pleadings, gather evidence, and appear in court. Uncontested petitions that proceed smoothly involve lower fees, while contested matters requiring discovery, expert testimony, or multiple hearings increase legal costs. Court filing fees and potential fees for service of process or third-party records are additional considerations. We provide an initial assessment and estimate based on the specific facts of each matter and discuss fee structures and potential alternatives. Early outreach and negotiation can reduce expense by narrowing disputes. Understanding anticipated costs helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing petitions versus alternative resolution paths.
To begin a trust modification petition in Boyle Heights, start by scheduling a consultation to review the trust document and related materials. During the initial meeting, bring the trust, any amendments, wills, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence or notes that explain the settlor’s intentions. This information allows us to assess whether a petition is appropriate and to outline likely procedural steps and timelines. From there, we discuss strategy, potential alternatives, and the evidence needed to support a petition. If proceeding, we handle preparation of the petition, required notices, and filings with the probate court, while keeping you informed at each stage. Early, organized preparation improves the likelihood of an efficient and effective resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas