A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used in California to address situations where assets intended to belong to a living trust were not transferred into the trust before the transferor died. This petition asks the court to recognize that certain property should be treated as having been transferred to the trust and to order the county recorder to reflect the trust as the owner. Families in Bradbury often turn to this process to avoid a full probate or to clear title problems that block the transfer of homes, bank accounts, or other assets. We help local clients gather the right paperwork and present a clear evidentiary record to achieve orderly transfer and peace of mind.
Handling a Heggstad petition in Los Angeles County involves careful documentation, timely filings, and attention to local court and recorder practices. Typical items that help a petition succeed include declarations from trustees and beneficiaries, the trust instrument or certification of trust, a death certificate, and any transfer documents or correspondence showing the decedent’s intent. Because every case has unique facts, meeting with counsel to review available records and develop a plan for filing can make the process more efficient. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in Bradbury with collecting evidence, preparing the petition, and managing communications with the court and recorder to move retitling forward.
A Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary delay and expense by resolving title defects without full probate administration. When property intended for a trust remains in the decedent’s individual name, beneficiaries may face hurdles in selling, refinancing, or managing assets. The petition process gives a pathway to obtain a court order recognizing the transfer, clarifying ownership and enabling recordation. Benefits include a more direct transfer to trust-controlled ownership, clearer chain of title for heirs and purchasers, and fewer administrative steps than a contested probate. For families in Bradbury, securing a court order can reduce stress and allow trustees to carry out the trust’s disposition plans in a timely manner.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning and post-death administration matters for individuals and families across California, including residents of Bradbury. The firm approaches Heggstad petitions with a practical mindset, prioritizing thorough document review, clear communication, and efficient court filings. We work to assemble declarations, trust documents such as revocable living trusts, certification of trust forms, and related evidence to support a petition. Our goal is to help clients resolve title problems with as little disruption as possible while ensuring legal requirements are met and all interested parties are properly notified and given an opportunity to be heard in court.
A Heggstad petition addresses the gap that occurs when a person created a trust but some assets never got retitled before death. The petition asks the probate court to declare that specific property should be considered part of the trust because it was intended to be transferred or because ownership should be treated in a way consistent with the trust document. Outcomes commonly include a court order directing the county recorder to accept documents transferring title, clarification of beneficiary rights, and a formal record that allows trustees to manage or distribute assets as the trust requires. The process relies on factual evidence of intent and supporting declarations.
Successful petitions typically require assembling a clear narrative supported by documents and witness statements. Important materials include a copy of the trust or certification, proof of the decedent’s death, any instrument that attempted to transfer property, and declarations from those with knowledge of the decedent’s intent. The court examines whether the evidence shows that the property was meant to be controlled by the trust. If the court grants the petition, the order can be used to update public records, confirming trust ownership and enabling trustees to take necessary actions such as selling, refinancing, or distributing assets to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition derives its name from a California appellate decision addressing property that was never retitled into a trust but was intended to be part of it. The petition asks the probate court to determine that property belongs to the trust based on the decedent’s intent and the surrounding circumstances. Courts look for documentary and testimonial evidence showing the decedent took steps to make the transfer or intended the trust to hold the asset. The resulting order provides a legal foundation for recording a transfer or otherwise confirming title in the trust’s name, reducing ambiguity for trustees and beneficiaries.
Important elements of a Heggstad petition include a clear identification of the property, a statement of the decedent’s intent, and supporting documentation such as trust instruments, transfer documents, and declarations from knowledgeable individuals. The process generally involves an initial case assessment, preparation of the petition and supporting declarations, filing and service on interested parties, and a court hearing where a judge evaluates the evidence. If successful, the court issues an order enabling the recorder to update title records. Attention to local rules and proper notice to heirs or creditors is an essential part of this process.
This glossary covers terms commonly encountered when pursuing a Heggstad petition, helping clients understand the vocabulary used in filings and court proceedings. Terms explain the nature of a petition, what a trust certification does, how probate differs from a trust remedy, and how court orders are recorded. Familiarity with these concepts makes communication with counsel and the court more efficient. When gathering documents, knowing which items correspond to these terms accelerates the preparation of a persuasive case that supports the transfer of assets to the trust’s control.
A Heggstad petition is a probate filing seeking a judicial determination that specific property should be treated as part of a trust, even though legal title remains in the decedent’s name. The petition presents facts and evidence of the decedent’s intention to transfer the property into the trust before death or to have the trust control that property. Supporting materials often include the trust document or a certification of trust, declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, and proof of death. The court’s order provides authority to record the decision and change public records to reflect trust ownership, enabling trustees to manage or distribute assets according to the trust instrument.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a deceased person’s estate when assets are held in the decedent’s individual name or when there is no effective trust. It typically involves proving a will, appointing a personal representative, identifying and valuing assets, paying creditors, and distributing remaining property to heirs. A Heggstad petition provides an alternative in some situations by allowing a court to recognize that certain assets belong to a trust, thereby avoiding the need to administer those assets through probate. Understanding the distinction helps families choose the most appropriate legal path for resolving title and distribution issues.
A constructive trust is a judicial remedy that treats property as held in trust to correct situations where retention of property by a party would be unjust. In the context of trust transfers and Heggstad petitions, the court may consider equitable remedies when a decedent’s intent and the conduct of parties suggest the property should have belonged to the trust. While a Heggstad petition focuses on recognizing a transfer to a trust, equitable concepts such as a constructive trust can arise when courts evaluate fairness, intent, and the appropriate disposition of disputed assets. Remedies are fact-driven and depend on the court’s analysis.
A certification of trust is a summary document that provides key information about a trust without disclosing the entire trust instrument. It typically includes the trust’s name, date, the identity of the trustee, and the trustee’s powers, along with a notarized signature. Courts, financial institutions, and county recorders often accept a certification of trust as proof of the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority. When preparing a Heggstad petition, a certification of trust can help demonstrate that a trust existed and identify the authorized trustee, assisting the court in evaluating whether certain assets should be recognized as trust property.
When dealing with assets that were not retitled into a trust, several legal pathways may be available. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that the specific property should be treated as trust property based on intent and supporting evidence, potentially avoiding broader probate proceedings. Probate is the traditional court process for administering estate assets left in a decedent’s name. In some cases, an action to quiet title or other equitable remedies could be relevant. Deciding which path to take depends on the property value, the clarity of supporting records, the presence of competing claims, and the client’s objectives for speed, cost, and finality.
A limited petition can be appropriate when documentation clearly shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Examples include a trust instrument referencing the asset, transfer paperwork that was nearly completed, or communications indicating the decedent’s intent. When such documentary evidence is available, the court can more readily determine that title should reflect the trust’s ownership without the need for full estate administration. Preparing a well-organized file of the trust and supporting records helps streamline the petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable, narrowly tailored court order.
A narrow petition may suffice when the asset at issue is of limited value or when there are no competing claims from other heirs or creditors. Courts review the surrounding facts and may grant relief that adjusts title for the specific asset without opening an extensive probate matter. This approach can save time and reduce costs for families seeking to clear title for practical needs like selling a property or accessing a bank account. Clear notice to potential interested parties and transparent documentation are important even for limited petitions to avoid later challenges.
A more comprehensive proceeding is often necessary when multiple parties claim ownership or when there are contested questions about the decedent’s intentions. In such circumstances, the court may need a full record that addresses creditor claims, will contests, or competing beneficiary assertions. A broader approach can include probate administration or declaratory relief to resolve disputes and produce a final determination of rights. Preparing for a contested matter requires careful fact development, witness preparation, and a strategy to address all potential claims to achieve a clear, enforceable resolution.
When the decedent owned a mix of property types or assets located in multiple jurisdictions, resolving title issues may demand a broader legal approach. Cross-jurisdictional matters can involve differing recording requirements, variations in trust recognition, and coordination with local counsel or foreign recorders. Complex portfolios may include retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, or property with title encumbrances that all need to be addressed in a coordinated way. A comprehensive plan can help ensure that each asset is handled appropriately to protect beneficiary interests and bring finality to estate administration.
Taking a comprehensive approach to resolve title issues provides stronger protection against future disputes by addressing related matters in a single proceeding. This method may incorporate review of the trust, notice to potential claimants, addressing creditor issues, and coordinating recordings with county offices. By creating a complete administrative and evidentiary record, families reduce the risk of lingering questions that could delay sales or transfers. A thorough process also tends to streamline subsequent transactions by ensuring that trustees have clear authority and that public records reflect accurate ownership.
A broader approach can also provide greater assurance to third parties such as title companies, lenders, and buyers that the transaction is legally sound. When the court issues comprehensive orders resolving ownership and authority, recorders and title insurers are more likely to accept transfers and clear title endorsements. Additionally, resolving related issues at once often lowers cumulative costs and reduces the time families spend navigating multiple separate proceedings. The result is a more predictable path forward for trustees and beneficiaries seeking to manage or distribute estate property.
A comprehensive strategy helps create a definitive record demonstrating the trust’s rights to specific assets, which in turn allows recorders, title companies, and potential buyers to proceed with confidence. By addressing competing claims, creditor issues, and recording requirements in a coordinated way, families secure a clearer chain of title. This reduces the risk of future litigation and makes it easier for trustees to sell, refinance, or transfer property in accordance with the trust. The overall benefit is fewer surprises and smoother transactions when dealing with estate property.
Addressing potential issues across the estate in a single, organized proceeding reduces the chance that unresolved matters will lead to later disputes or delays. When the court issues orders that resolve ownership and trustee authority, those orders can be relied upon by title companies and other parties, which decreases the likelihood of subsequent challenges. Managing notifications, creditor timelines, and recording all at once helps minimize administrative delays and provides beneficiaries with clearer expectations for distribution and management of assets.
Begin by collecting any trust documents, certification of trust, deed copies, transfer forms, and correspondence that reflect the decedent’s intent to place the asset into the trust. Include a certified copy of the death certificate and any bank or title company communications. Organize materials chronologically and note who has personal knowledge of the transfers or discussions. The clearer and more comprehensive the documentation you provide, the stronger the factual foundation for a petition. Organized records also shorten preparation time and reduce back-and-forth during the court’s review.
Understand local recorder office procedures and filing windows to plan how a court order will be recorded after a Heggstad petition is granted. Some recorders require specific forms or additional proof before updating title. Coordinating the timing of filings and preparing recording documents in advance helps expedite the transfer once the court issues an order. Also consider potential deadlines for creditors or claims that might affect notice requirements. Awareness of these practical steps reduces delays and helps trustees complete transactions promptly after a favorable order.
Families often pursue a Heggstad petition when a loved one created a trust but did not complete all retitling steps before death, leaving property technically in the decedent’s name. This can prevent trustees from exercising control or transferring assets according to the trust terms. A petition can be faster and more targeted than full probate when evidence of intent is clear and disputes are unlikely. Clients choose this path to gain court recognition of trust ownership, enabling practical actions like selling a home or transferring bank accounts without unnecessary administrative hurdles.
A Heggstad petition also benefits situations where a quick resolution is important, such as when property needs to be transferred to settle financial obligations or to preserve value. The petition process can clarify ownership for title companies, lenders, and beneficiary distributions, reducing obstacles to refinancing or sale. For trustees tasked with carrying out trust provisions, a successful petition offers a path to enforce the settlor’s wishes and bring greater certainty to estate administration in a cost-effective way compared with broader contested proceedings.
Frequent triggers for a Heggstad petition include deeds or accounts that remain in the decedent’s name despite a trust being in place, administrative errors at closing, or assets that were intended to be moved into the trust but were overlooked. Other scenarios involve transfers attempted shortly before death that were never recorded, or when third parties refuse to accept trust documentation without a court order. In these circumstances, filing a petition helps create a judicial record clarifying title so trustees can take necessary actions on behalf of beneficiaries.
When real estate or other titled assets were never formally transferred into the trust, those assets remain in the decedent’s name and can pose administrative obstacles for trustees. A Heggstad petition can address this by presenting evidence showing the decedent’s intent and requesting a court order to record title in the trust’s name. This process helps trustees access and manage the property, resolve issues with buyers or lenders, and complete transactions that would otherwise be delayed until a probate administration concluded or a more involved litigation resolved competing claims.
Closing errors, missing signatures, or paperwork that was never properly recorded can leave assets improperly titled after death. When the trustee can show that steps were taken to transfer property to the trust or that the decedent intended the transfer, a Heggstad petition asks the court to remedy the defect. Demonstrating intent through documents and witness statements often allows the court to grant relief that corrects recorder records, enabling trustees to proceed with the administration or sale of the property without unnecessary further legal delay.
Occasionally, a decedent’s will and trust may appear to conflict, or assets referenced in estate documents are described inconsistently, creating confusion over ownership. A Heggstad petition can be used to clarify that certain property belongs to the trust despite such discrepancies, provided the evidence supports that intent. The court evaluates the overall circumstances, including the trust language, the decedent’s actions, and supporting declarations. Resolving these discrepancies through court order helps trustees avoid prolonged disputes and ensures the decedent’s intended distribution is honored.
We assist Bradbury residents with every step of a Heggstad petition, from reviewing trust documents and gathering declarations to preparing the petition and coordinating filings with Los Angeles County. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about timelines, required documentation, and potential outcomes so clients know what to expect throughout the process. We prepare the necessary court papers, serve notices to interested parties, and follow through on recording any court orders with the county recorder after the hearing. Our goal is to help clients move retitling forward efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings focused attention to probate and trust-related filings, including Heggstad petitions, and works to assemble a persuasive presentation of the facts. We prioritize meticulous document review to identify the strongest evidence of intent and ownership, and we prepare declarations and exhibits that help the court understand the circumstances surrounding the transfer. Clear organization and thorough preparation improve the likelihood of an efficient resolution that enables trustees to act in accordance with the trust terms.
We emphasize timely communication with clients in Bradbury, explaining options, expected timelines, and the practical steps required to move from filing to recording. Our process includes a careful assessment of whether a Heggstad petition is the most appropriate remedy versus alternative approaches, and we discuss likely outcomes and potential areas of dispute. Throughout the matter, we work to minimize procedural surprises, keep interested parties informed, and coordinate with title companies or county recorders as needed to implement the court’s order.
Clients receive support in preparing for hearings and in responding to any inquiries from the court or other parties. We prepare declarations and other evidentiary materials, help identify witnesses, and ensure that necessary notices are provided. After a favorable order, we assist with recording the order and any deed or transfer instruments required to update public records. This full-service handling helps trustees complete administrative tasks efficiently so they can focus on carrying out the trust’s intent.
Our process begins with an intake to gather the trust document, death certificate, and any transfer paperwork, followed by a careful review to determine the best path. We then prepare the petition and supporting declarations, file the case in the appropriate probate court, and serve required parties. At the hearing, we present a concise factual record that demonstrates the decedent’s intent. After the court’s order, we assist with recording the order and any deeds so title reflects the trust ownership. Throughout, we keep clients apprised of court dates and next steps.
The first step focuses on collecting and reviewing all relevant materials that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to transfer property into the trust. This includes obtaining the trust instrument, certification of trust, deeds, transfer forms, account statements, and the decedent’s death certificate. We also identify potential interested parties who must be given notice. A comprehensive initial review allows us to determine whether the facts are suitable for a Heggstad petition and what additional evidence or declarations may be needed to support the requested relief.
During a detailed client interview we discuss the timeline of events, any attempted transfers, and the decedent’s estate planning documents. We examine the trust to identify the trustee, beneficiaries, and dispositive provisions that relate to the property at issue. This conversation helps us determine which witnesses and documents will best support the petition and clarifies any factual gaps that require additional investigation. Clear answers and assembled records at the outset reduce delays and improve the quality of the petition.
We conduct a title and asset search to confirm how property is currently recorded and to identify liens or encumbrances that may affect the proposed transfer. For bank or brokerage accounts, we verify account ownership and any beneficiary designations. This step uncovers issues that could complicate the petition and informs the drafting of declarations and supporting exhibits. Understanding the current title status enables tailored remedies and helps anticipate any objections from third parties or creditors.
After gathering evidence and completing the initial review, we draft the petition and supporting declarations to present a clear factual narrative to the court. The filing includes proposed orders and recording documents to be used if the court grants relief. We ensure that all interested parties are properly served and that statutory notice requirements are satisfied. Proper drafting and notice preparation are essential to avoid procedural defects that could delay relief or require supplemental filings.
Drafting focuses on presenting a coherent story supported by documents and witness statements. Declarations typically come from the trustee, beneficiaries, or professionals who assisted with transfers. Exhibits include trust excerpts, deeds, correspondence, and death records. Precise drafting of the petition and declarations helps the court understand the basis for recognizing trust ownership and reduces the need for supplemental evidence. We aim to prepare materials that facilitate an efficient hearing and a clear court order.
Once the petition package is complete, we file it with the appropriate probate court and arrange for service on all required parties, including heirs, beneficiaries, and creditors when applicable. We comply with local rules regarding filing procedures and timing. Proper service ensures the hearing can proceed and reduces the risk of post-judgment challenges based on defective notice. We monitor court filing calendars and confirm the case is scheduled for a hearing at a time that allows necessary witnesses to be available.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, the evidence, and any objections, then issues a ruling. If the court finds that the evidence supports trust ownership, it will enter an order that can be recorded with the county recorder to update title. After the order is entered, we assist clients with recordation and any follow-up matters, such as contacting title companies or lenders to confirm the updated ownership. Recording the court’s order is the final step in effecting the transfer in public records.
During the hearing, counsel presents the petition and any supporting declarations or exhibits, answers the judge’s questions, and addresses any objections from other parties. Clear presentation of the facts and evidence often results in a prompt ruling. We prepare witnesses and ensure that the record reflects the decedent’s intent and the steps taken toward transfer. Being well-prepared at the hearing helps the court reach a decision and reduces the likelihood of additional proceedings or requests for further proof.
Once the court enters an order granting the petition, the order and any accompanying documents are submitted to the county recorder for updating the public records. We prepare deeds or other recording instruments consistent with the court’s order and follow the recorder’s requirements to effect the title change. Updating title completes the transition of the asset into the trust’s control and enables trustees to manage, sell, or distribute the property in accordance with the trust terms without further administrative obstacles.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize that property should be treated as part of a trust despite remaining in the decedent’s individual name. It is used when the decedent intended to transfer certain assets to a trust but did not complete the recording or retitling steps before death. The petition sets out facts and evidence showing the decedent’s intent and requests an order directing the recorder or other entities to treat the property as trust property. This remedy is often chosen to avoid opening a full probate for the assets at issue and to provide a clear path for trustees to manage or distribute those assets. The success of the petition depends on the strength of documentary and testimonial evidence. Commonly submitted items include the trust or a certification of trust, correspondence or transfer documents, a death certificate, and declarations from those with knowledge of the transfer or the decedent’s wishes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Los Angeles County varies based on document preparation, court scheduling, and whether objections are filed. Preparing a thorough petition can take several weeks to assemble declarations and exhibits. Once filed, the court’s calendar determines the hearing date, which may be a matter of weeks or a few months depending on court workload and notice periods required for serving interested parties. If the petition is uncontested and the evidence is clear, the court may grant relief at the first hearing and the subsequent recording process can be completed shortly thereafter. Contested matters or missing documentation can extend the timeline. Working proactively to gather complete proof and to provide proper notice typically expedites the process and reduces delays related to supplemental filings or additional hearings.
Key documents for a Heggstad petition include the trust instrument or a certification of trust, a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate, any deeds or transfer documents that show attempted conveyance, and account statements or other records indicating the decedent’s intention. Declarations from the trustee, beneficiaries, or third parties who observed the decedent’s efforts to transfer property also carry significant weight. Corroborating materials, such as emails or correspondence referencing the transfer, further strengthen the record. Organizing these materials clearly and presenting them with well-drafted declarations helps the court evaluate intent and the surrounding circumstances. If any documents are missing, an explanation and credible witness testimony addressing the gap can still support the petition. The presence of multiple consistent sources of proof increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A Heggstad petition does not necessarily require full probate administration; its purpose is to resolve title for specific assets intended to belong to a trust. When the evidence supports the requested relief and there are no competing claims, the court may grant an order limited to the assets at issue without opening a complete probate estate. This focused remedy can save time and cost compared with administering the entire estate through probate. However, if there are unresolved creditor claims, disputes among heirs, or other contested issues that affect the broader estate, the court may require additional proceedings or notice to interested parties. It is important to evaluate whether a limited petition is appropriate given the full context of the decedent’s assets and potential claims.
Title companies commonly accept a court order entered after a Heggstad petition as evidence to clear or update title, provided the order is explicit about the property and the recording instruments are prepared correctly. The order typically instructs the county recorder to accept certain documents or clarifies ownership in a manner that title companies can rely upon when issuing title policies. Preparing recording documents consistent with the court’s directives helps ensure acceptance by title professionals. Some title insurers may request additional proof or endorsements, especially if there are liens or complex encumbrances. Early communication with the chosen title company about their documentation requirements helps anticipate any necessary steps. Having a clear court order and properly prepared recording instruments generally facilitates title acceptance and issuance of policies.
Proper notice is an important component of filing a Heggstad petition. Interested parties typically include heirs, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors or persons who might claim an ownership interest in the property. Local probate rules set out who must be served and the method of service, and failing to provide required notice can lead to procedural complications or delay. Identifying all potential interested parties early in the process avoids surprises and helps ensure the hearing can proceed. In some cases, notice must be published or delivered by mail, depending on who the parties are and whether their identities are known. Completing service in accordance with statutory requirements protects the validity of the court’s order and reduces the likelihood of post-judgment challenges based on insufficient notice.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, the supporting declarations, and any objections from other parties. Counsel presents the factual record showing the decedent’s intent and the evidence of attempted transfers to the trust. The judge may ask questions about the documents or the witnesses’ statements to evaluate whether the petition meets the legal standard for recognizing the transfer. If the court is satisfied, it will issue an order granting the requested relief for the specified property. If objections are raised, the court may continue the matter to allow for additional evidence or may limit relief pending further proof. Being prepared with clear declarations and organized exhibits increases the likelihood of a prompt decision and reduces the need for supplemental proceedings.
A Heggstad petition might be denied if the court finds insufficient evidence of the decedent’s intent to transfer the property to the trust or if important interested parties were not properly notified. Incomplete, inconsistent, or weak documentary support and declarations may lead the judge to conclude that the petitioner has not met the required standard. Similarly, if competing claims raise significant factual disputes, the court may decline to grant relief without a more extensive proceeding. Addressing potential weaknesses at the outset by gathering corroborating documents, preparing detailed declarations, and ensuring proper notice reduces the chances of denial. If the petition is opposed, negotiating with other parties or obtaining additional evidence may resolve disputes and allow the court to grant relief at a later hearing.
A Heggstad petition typically addresses ownership between the decedent and the trust rather than directly resolving creditor claims. Creditors of the decedent may still have rights against assets that would otherwise have been part of the decedent’s estate. The court will consider notice requirements for creditors and any applicable statutes when evaluating the petition. In some situations, the court’s order may be conditioned on satisfying creditor notice requirements or addressing outstanding liabilities. It is important to identify and consider creditor issues early in the process so that appropriate notice can be given and potential claims are addressed. Working proactively with counsel helps ensure that the petition does not inadvertently affect creditor rights or create downstream complications for trustees and beneficiaries.
To begin, gather the trust document or a certification of trust, a certified copy of the death certificate, and any deeds or transfer records related to the property at issue. Compile any correspondence or account statements that indicate the decedent’s intent and identify anyone who can provide a declaration about the transfer attempts or the decedent’s discussions. Having these materials ready allows for an efficient intake and assessment of whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. Contacting counsel to review the assembled documents and to discuss potential interested parties, notice requirements, and the likely evidence needed for court is a practical next step. Early consultation helps develop a plan for gathering supplemental proof, drafting declarations, and setting expectations for timeline and likely outcomes so you can move forward with clarity.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas