A Heggstad petition is a legal tool used when assets intended for a trust were not formally transferred before the settlor’s death or incapacity. If you are in Brentwood and concerned that trust assets were not properly moved into a trust, this petition can help a court confirm that those assets should be treated as part of the trust. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our central goal is to explain how a Heggstad petition works, what documentation is usually required, and how the process can protect beneficiaries and preserve the settlor’s estate planning intentions in a clear and effective way.
Many families encounter unexpected hurdles when a decedent’s assets remain titled in an individual’s name instead of the trust. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that such assets were meant to be in the trust, based on available evidence like trust documents, statements, and other records. The petition can be an efficient method to avoid prolonged probate, minimize disputes among heirs, and align asset administration with the decedent’s stated plan. This page outlines how the Heggstad petition process typically unfolds in Los Angeles County and what steps to prepare for a successful filing.
Filing a Heggstad petition can offer several important benefits when assets intended for a trust were not properly transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. It can provide judicial recognition that specific property belongs to the trust, reduce the time and cost involved in probate administration, and clarify title for banks, brokers, and transfer agents. The petition commonly relies on documentary evidence and witness statements to demonstrate the settlor’s intent. When successful, the court’s order helps trustees carry out the trust’s terms, preserve the settlor’s wishes, and limit potential disputes from beneficiaries or creditors who might otherwise challenge asset ownership.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents individuals and families across California in estate planning and trust administration matters. Our approach is to provide clear guidance on trust documentation, probate alternatives, and petitions like those under Heggstad that help align asset ownership with the settlor’s intentions. We work with clients to gather necessary records, prepare persuasive filings, and coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries to streamline the process. Communication is emphasized at every step so clients in Brentwood and surrounding communities understand timelines, possible outcomes, and practical next steps tailored to their estate planning needs.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets owned by a decedent or incapacitated person should be treated as trust property despite the absence of formal transfer. The petitioner must present evidence showing that the settlor intended those assets to be held in the trust, such as trust language, beneficiary designations, transfer documents, correspondence, financial statements, and witness declarations. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and may enter an order clarifying ownership. The procedure can be used to avoid separate probate proceedings for assets meant to pass under the trust’s terms.
Common examples that prompt a Heggstad petition include bank or brokerage accounts, real property, or retirement assets that remain in the decedent’s name, or where transfer paperwork was incomplete. The petition process often involves coordinating with financial institutions and recording corrected titles where necessary. Filing parties should be prepared for potential responses from beneficiaries or creditors and for the court to review evidence closely. Proper preparation of the petition increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling and helps trustees administer the trust asset pool without unnecessary delay or dispute.
At its core, a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain assets belong to a trust even though the formal transfer was not completed. The legal theory rests on demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and showing sufficient documentation or correspondence supporting that intent. The petition typically requests the court to confirm trust ownership, authorize the trustee to manage and distribute the assets under the trust’s terms, and direct third parties such as banks and title companies to recognize the court order. The Heggstad route is frequently used to protect the trust’s integrity and expedite estate administration.
A successful Heggstad petition depends on assembling convincing evidence and following local procedural rules. Important elements include a clear description of the asset, the trust document or its relevant provisions, any written communications that show intent to fund the trust, account statements or deeds, and declarations from those with knowledge of the settlor’s intent. The filing must comply with Los Angeles County probate court requirements, include proper notice to interested parties, and anticipate potential objections. Working through these steps methodically reduces the risk of contest and helps move assets into trust administration efficiently.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process and supports informed decisions. This short glossary covers the typical language you will encounter in filings and court orders associated with Heggstad petitions. Knowing these definitions aids in gathering the right documentation, communicating with the trustee and court, and evaluating whether a petition is the best path to resolve misplaced or uncleared trust assets. Clear terminology reduces confusion for trustees, beneficiaries, and family members during a sensitive probate or trust administration matter.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets, or intended to transfer assets, into that trust. The settlor’s written instructions and documented actions are central to a Heggstad petition, because the petition must show that those assets were meant to be held in trust. Evidence such as the trust instrument, account applications, correspondence, or contemporaneous notes can help establish the settlor’s intent. When the settlor has died or is incapacitated and assets remain outside the trust, the settlor’s documented intentions often determine whether the court will recognize trust ownership.
The trustee is the person or institution charged with managing trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries according to the terms of the trust. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee may petition the court or support a petition to have certain assets declared part of the trust so they can be managed and distributed properly. The trustee’s role includes assembling documentation, presenting evidence to the court, and, if ordered, taking steps to retitle property and inform financial institutions of the court’s ruling to avoid administrative delays.
A probate court order is a formal ruling that resolves a dispute or clarifies ownership and authority during trust administration or probate proceedings. For a Heggstad petition, the court may issue an order recognizing particular assets as trust property, thereby authorizing the trustee to act on those assets. This order is useful for banks, title companies, and other third parties who require legal confirmation before transferring or releasing assets. The order helps prevent conflicting claims and guides trustees in carrying out the settlor’s intentions as reflected in the trust document.
Notice to interested parties means providing formal notification to beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other stakeholders about the petition and any scheduled hearings. Proper notice is typically required under California probate rules to give those parties an opportunity to appear and raise objections. Failure to provide adequate notice can delay the process or result in hearings being continued. Including appropriate notice lists and proof of service in the petition filing helps the court proceed efficiently and reduces the risk of procedural challenges from parties who might contest the petition.
When assets intended for a trust are not properly transferred, there are multiple paths to consider, including a Heggstad petition, initiating full probate, or negotiating transfers with financial institutions when possible. A Heggstad petition can be faster and more focused than full probate because it specifically addresses ownership questions for particular assets. Probate involves a broader court-supervised administration process that may be lengthier and more public. Sometimes informal resolutions are available if third parties accept trust documents without court action, but when institutions or title issues resist, a petition may be the most reliable way to protect the trust’s interests and ensure proper distribution.
A limited approach can be appropriate when the assets in question are small in value or are accompanied by clear documentation showing the settlor’s intent to include them in the trust. If banks or brokers will accept trust paperwork and change title without court involvement, the trustee may avoid court altogether. This path depends on the willingness of third parties to rely on declarations and trust copies. Documentation such as account statements, trust provisions, and contemporaneous communications reduce uncertainty and can enable direct transfer of assets into the trust with minimal formal proceedings.
When beneficiaries and other interested parties agree on how to treat the assets, and there are no foreseeable disputes, an informal transfer or a short declaration may resolve the issue without a Heggstad petition. Mutual agreement can simplify communications with financial institutions, leading to title changes and distributions aligned with the trust. Nonetheless, informal resolutions require careful documentation to prevent later challenges. When consensus is clear and third parties cooperate, trustees can often administer the assets efficiently while preserving the settlor’s intended distribution plan and avoiding court delays.
Court intervention is often required when title issues are complex or financial institutions refuse to recognize trust ownership without judicial direction. Real property deeds, retirement accounts, or brokerage holdings can present legal and procedural hurdles that third parties will not resolve based on trust copies alone. When institutions demand a court order, filing a Heggstad petition clarifies ownership and compels third parties to comply. Preparing a petition in such situations involves careful evidence collection, adherence to local rules, and clear presentation to the court to obtain the necessary directives for asset transfer and trust administration.
If beneficiaries or potential heirs raise disputes or conflicting claims about whether assets should be part of a trust, a Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate competing evidence and make a binding determination. Disagreements over intent, ambiguous documentation, or competing beneficiary claims can delay administration and increase costs. Bringing the matter before the probate court provides a structured forum for resolving conflicts based on the record and testimony. The resulting order helps prevent future litigation and gives trustees clear authority to manage and distribute trust property.
A careful, court-backed approach to unresolved trust transfers helps ensure legal clarity and reduces the chance of future disputes. When the court issues an order recognizing assets as trust property, trustees can act decisively, financial institutions will accept the ruling, and beneficiaries gain confidence that distributions will follow the trust’s written terms. This approach can ultimately save time and expense compared with protracted disagreement or repeated ad hoc negotiations. Court involvement offers a durable solution that supports effective estate administration and preserves the settlor’s stated intentions through enforceable directives.
Additionally, pursuing a formal petition can provide peace of mind by producing a final, enforceable determination of ownership. That certainty helps trustees complete account transfers, retitle real estate, and manage assets without the risk of later reversal. It also clarifies tax and reporting responsibilities and can protect trustees from liability when they act in accordance with a court order. For families dealing with the loss of a loved one, a definitive judicial ruling can reduce conflict and allow beneficiaries to focus on honoring the decedent’s wishes rather than engaging in prolonged legal disputes.
One major benefit of a successful petition is that it produces a clear title that third parties will recognize, facilitating smooth transfers and distributions under the trust. Banks, brokerage firms, and county recorders are more likely to process retitling or release funds when presented with a court order. This reduces administrative friction and helps trustees avoid delays when paying debts, taxes, or distributing assets. Achieving clear title through the court process enables the trustee to carry out the trust’s terms reliably and prevents later disputes over asset ownership that could otherwise disrupt administration.
A formal court determination lowers the likelihood of future challenges to the ownership and disposition of trust assets because the ruling creates an authoritative record. When a judge reviews the evidence and issues an order, subsequent litigants face a higher hurdle to overturn that decision. For trustees and beneficiaries, this stability can mean fewer contested proceedings and less emotional and financial strain on the family. By resolving ownership questions early and definitively, the Heggstad petition helps ensure distributions align with the decedent’s documented plan and that administration proceeds with predictable legal support.
Collecting all available documentation is essential before filing a Heggstad petition. This includes the trust document itself, account statements, deeds, transfer applications, correspondence indicating intent to fund the trust, and any draft forms or notes the settlor left. Declarations from family members or professionals who observed the settlor’s actions can also bolster the petition. Thorough preparation saves time during court review, helps address potential objections promptly, and demonstrates the strength of the settlor’s intent to treat the asset as part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
Expect financial institutions and title companies to have internal requirements before they will retitle accounts or transfer property. Some institutions accept a certified copy of a trust plus a corporate or trustee signature, while others insist on a court order. Confirming those requirements early helps tailor the petition and supporting documentation so the court’s order addresses the specific concerns institutions raise. Early coordination saves time and minimizes back-and-forth after the order is entered, allowing trustees to complete retitling and distribution more efficiently.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets that should have been transferred to a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name or when third parties refuse to recognize trust ownership. If a trust exists but funding was incomplete, a petition can clarify ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Petitions are particularly helpful where title issues threaten to delay distribution, where financial institutions demand judicial confirmation, or where unclear documentation risks creating disputes among beneficiaries or creditors seeking competing claims against the same property.
Families may also pursue a petition to reduce the administrative complexity and expense associated with full probate, since a focused petition that addresses specific assets can be narrower and faster than opening a comprehensive probate estate. When there is evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, a petition can preserve the benefits of trust administration by keeping assets within the trust framework. This option supports orderly administration, protects beneficiary expectations, and helps trustees carry out distributions in line with the settlor’s written plan.
Typical circumstances include newly discovered assets still in the decedent’s name, inadvertent omissions during trust funding, and financial institution resistance to accepting trust documentation. Real property sometimes remains titled in the deceased person’s name due to oversight, or accounts may have been opened without naming the trust as owner. Retirement account beneficiary designations or payable-on-death registrations that contradict trust planning also create scenarios where a petition clarifies intended ownership. Identifying these situations early helps families decide whether petition filing is the most efficient path forward.
Real estate intended for a trust but still listed in the settlor’s personal name is a frequent reason to file a Heggstad petition. Mortgages, deeds, and county records may show the decedent as owner, and title companies often require a court order to transfer or clear title. The petition can establish that the property was always meant to be part of the trust and secure a judicial order directing recordation or retitling. This protects beneficiaries by allowing the trustee to manage or sell real property pursuant to trust provisions, avoiding separate probate proceedings for the asset.
Bank and brokerage accounts that remain in the decedent’s name rather than the trust can block immediate access to funds needed for estate administration or distributions. Institutions often insist on legal documentation before releasing assets, and when they will not accept trust copies alone, a court order may be necessary. A Heggstad petition provides the formal recognition required for institutions to transfer or release funds to the trustee. This helps ensure bills are paid, taxes are handled, and beneficiaries receive distributions according to the trust’s instructions.
Retirement and certain investment accounts sometimes present complications due to beneficiary designations, plan rules, or institutional policies. If those accounts were meant to be controlled by a trust but paperwork was not completed correctly, a Heggstad petition can clarify how the assets should be handled. Courts review the intent behind account titling and beneficiary choices, and when appropriate will authorize treating the account as trust property. This remedy assists trustees in making informed decisions about distribution, rollover options, or tax implications consistent with the trust terms.
If you are in Brentwood and facing issues with trust funding or asset title, local representation can help coordinate filings within Los Angeles County. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with petitions that confirm trust ownership, retitle assets, and facilitate trust administration. We explain the process, prepare required documentation, and work toward a timely court resolution when necessary. Our goal is to help trustees and families move forward with confidence so assets are managed and distributed in line with the settlor’s intentions while complying with regional court procedures and institutional practices.
Our firm focuses on clear communication and practical solutions for estate planning and trust administration in California. When preparing a Heggstad petition, we prioritize collection of persuasive evidence, compliance with court rules, and careful notice to interested parties to reduce delays and handle objections thoughtfully. We work to present a compelling case to the court so assets are recognized as part of the trust and the trustee may proceed with administration. Clients benefit from a structured process that aims to resolve title issues efficiently and protect beneficiary interests.
We assist trustees and families in gathering trust documents, financial statements, deeds, and declarations that demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Our approach includes early outreach to relevant financial institutions and title companies to clarify their requirements and anticipate potential hurdles. By addressing these details before filing, we aim to limit rounds of supplemental filings and speed the court’s review. Clear preparation helps the filing stand up to scrutiny and reduces the chance of extended proceedings or additional court appearances.
Communication with beneficiaries and interested parties is part of the process, and we help ensure proper notice and documentation are served to reduce surprise objections. When disputes arise, we seek to resolve matters efficiently through evidence and focused hearings rather than protracted litigation. Our representation is designed to protect the settlor’s intentions as expressed in the trust while providing trustees with the legal foundation they need to manage and distribute trust assets reliably under California law.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents, asset records, and any related correspondence to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then gather supporting evidence, draft the petition according to Los Angeles County probate rules, and prepare notices for interested parties. If the petition proceeds to hearing, we present the evidence to the court and respond to objections on behalf of the trustee. After obtaining an order, we help implement the court’s directives by coordinating with financial institutions and recorders to retitle or transfer assets as needed.
The first step involves a thorough review of the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. We identify documents that support a judicial determination, request copies of account records from institutions as needed, and collect declarations from knowledgeable witnesses. Establishing a clear evidentiary foundation at the outset increases the likelihood of a favorable court ruling and helps streamline the subsequent filing and notice process with minimal need for supplemental material.
Careful review of the trust document and asset records reveals whether the settlor’s language and actions point to an intent to include the asset in the trust. We analyze beneficiary designations, deed histories, account forms, and any draft forms or communications that show contemporaneous intent. Pinpointing relevant evidence early allows us to craft a petition that directly addresses potential gaps in title or disagreements, and helps anticipate what the court will consider persuasive during its evaluation of the request to recognize assets as trust property.
When necessary, we obtain supplementary documentation such as account statements, transfer forms, or communications from financial institutions to support the petition. Declarations from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent or actions, including family members or advisors, help fill evidentiary gaps. Consolidating this additional information with the trust document increases the petition’s clarity and supports a concise presentation to the court. This preparation reduces the likelihood of continuances and helps the court reach a timely decision based on the full record.
Once the petition is prepared with supporting exhibits and declarations, we file it with the appropriate Los Angeles County probate court and serve notice to all interested parties. Serving notice in accordance with California probate rules ensures that beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors have an opportunity to respond. Proper service and filing help protect the final order from procedural attacks. We include relevant exhibits and prepare clear proofs of service so the court can schedule a hearing with the necessary record of notice and documentation.
We prepare the petition and attach all supporting exhibits, including trust excerpts, account statements, deeds, and witness declarations. The filing package is assembled to comply with local rules and court formatting requirements. After filing, we monitor the court calendar, respond to any procedural inquiries, and ensure that hearing dates and timelines are communicated clearly to the trustee and interested parties. Accurate and complete filings reduce the risk of continuances and present the court with a well-organized record for review.
Timely and proper service to beneficiaries and other interested parties is essential. We prepare proofs of service and track responses or potential objections, addressing any procedural issues promptly to preserve the integrity of the petition. If objections arise, we evaluate the grounds and advise on potential resolution strategies. Maintaining transparent communication with stakeholders while following court procedures ensures the process advances effectively and that the trustee is prepared for any hearing or negotiation that may be required to secure the desired outcome.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition and evidence, hears any objections, and decides whether to enter an order recognizing the assets as trust property. If the court issues an order, we assist with implementing its terms, including coordinating with banks, title companies, and recorders to retitle or transfer assets. We also prepare the trustee to act under the order, documenting compliance and completing any follow-up filings required by the court. Final implementation ensures the trustee can manage and distribute assets in accordance with the trust.
During the hearing we present the record of documents and supporting declarations that establish the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. We respond to any objections, clarify factual issues for the court, and emphasize legal principles that support recognizing the asset as trust property. A focused presentation helps the judge evaluate the petition efficiently and make a reasoned determination. Strong preparation beforehand ensures the hearing addresses the key questions and seeks an order that resolves title issues conclusively.
After the court issues an order, we work with trustees and third parties to carry out necessary transfers and recordings. This can include providing a certified order to banks for account transfers, submitting documents to county recorders to correct deeds, or coordinating with retirement plan administrators for required forms. Ensuring that institutions receive the court’s order in the accepted form speeds the transfer process and completes the administrative steps that allow the trustee to manage, liquidate, or distribute assets under the trust according to the settlor’s directions.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize specific assets as part of a trust even though formal transfer paperwork was not completed. It is used when the settlor clearly intended assets to be held in the trust but title remains in the settlor’s name, or institutions refuse to accept trust documents without court confirmation. The petition compiles evidence such as the trust instrument, account statements, deeds, and declarations to show intent and requests an order directing the assets be treated as trust property. Filing a petition helps trustees obtain legal authority to manage and distribute the asset under the trust terms. The court’s order can provide clear direction to banks, brokers, and recorders, enabling retitling or transfers that support efficient administration. When properly prepared, a petition can reduce delays and provide a binding resolution that aligns asset handling with the settlor’s documented plan.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, the complexity of the evidence, and whether interested parties object. Some petitions proceed relatively quickly if documentation is straightforward and no objections are filed, while contested matters may take longer due to additional pleadings and hearings. Local court caseloads and the need for supplemental evidence can also extend timelines, so early and thorough preparation helps move the matter forward more efficiently. Planning for potential responses and communicating with interested parties often reduces delays. Preparing a complete record, anticipating institutional requirements, and addressing notice properly increase the likelihood of a timely hearing and decision. In many cases, constructive outreach to beneficiaries and institutions before filing can shorten the overall process and limit the need for extended court proceedings.
Effective support for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document showing the settlor’s intent, account statements or deeds indicating the disputed asset, and any contemporaneous correspondence or forms that show the settlor intended to fund the trust. Declarations from family members, advisors, or other witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent can add persuasive weight. The more directly the evidence links the asset to the trust, the stronger the petition’s likelihood of success. Documentation from financial institutions, such as account applications or internal notes, can also be important when an institution questions ownership. Chambered evidence that clarifies the settlor’s intent and the asset’s history helps the court make a clear determination. Gathering thorough records before filing reduces the need for supplemental materials and supports a focused presentation to the judge.
A Heggstad petition can avoid opening a full probate estate for specific assets by having the court recognize those assets as trust property. Because the petition addresses title for particular items rather than conducting full probate administration, it can be a narrower option to preserve the benefits of the trust. However, whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the nature and number of assets involved and any competing claims from creditors or heirs that might require probate resolution. When assets are successfully declared part of the trust, trustees can often manage and distribute them under the trust without broader probate proceedings for those particular items. That said, parties should assess the overall estate picture to determine if other assets or circumstances still require probate, and plan filings accordingly to ensure comprehensive administration of the decedent’s affairs.
California probate rules require notice to interested parties when filing a Heggstad petition. Interested parties typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, and known creditors who may have claims against the estate. Identifying and properly serving these parties ensures they have the opportunity to respond and protects the court’s eventual ruling from procedural challenge. Proofs of service must be filed with the court to demonstrate compliance with notice requirements. Providing clear and timely notice reduces the chance of surprise objections and supports an orderly hearing process. When parties are informed and understand the petition’s purpose, many issues can be resolved through communication rather than contention. Proper notice also gives the court confidence that all stakeholders have been afforded due process before it issues an order addressing ownership and administration of the disputed assets.
If a beneficiary objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection along with the evidence presented. Objections may challenge the sufficiency of the proof of the settlor’s intent, contest the characterization of the asset, or raise concerns about notice and service. The petitioner must then respond to the objections with additional evidence or legal argument to show why the assets should be recognized as part of the trust. The court may schedule a contested hearing to weigh the competing claims and reach a decision. Resolving objections often requires careful review and possible supplementation of documentation. In some cases, parties reach a negotiated resolution that avoids a prolonged contested hearing. When disputes persist, the court’s factfinding determines ownership, and the judge’s order will specify how the asset is to be treated going forward, providing clarity and direction for the trustee and beneficiaries.
A court order entered after a Heggstad petition is typically persuasive to banks, brokerage firms, and title companies, and those institutions will usually comply with an order that clearly recognizes the asset as trust property. The order gives trustees the formal authority they need to retitle accounts, record deeds, or access funds consistent with the trust’s terms. Providing these institutions with the certified court order and any required trustee documentation helps ensure prompt execution of transfers or releases. Occasionally, institutions have internal procedures requiring additional paperwork or specific forms, even with a court order in hand. When that occurs, the trustee or counsel works with the institution to satisfy its procedures while relying on the court’s order to support the requested actions. Combining the order with attentive follow-through helps complete administrative steps efficiently.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition can include informal resolution with the asset holder, presenting trust documentation directly to institutions for retitling, or negotiating releases or affidavits that satisfy third parties. When an institution is willing to accept a certified trust copy and trustee signatures, court intervention may not be necessary. Families may also consider limited probate or other settlement procedures depending on the asset profile and potential creditor claims. However, when institutions refuse to accept trust documents or when disputes arise among heirs, a petition provides a reliable legal means to secure recognition of trust ownership. Assessing the likelihood of institutional cooperation and potential disputes helps determine whether a petition is the most cost-effective and secure route to achieve the desired outcome.
Costs to file a Heggstad petition vary with complexity, local court filing fees, the need for additional declarations or expert reports, and whether the petition is contested. Budget considerations should include attorney preparation time, court fees, and any costs for obtaining copies, certified documents, or records from financial institutions. Contested matters increase expenses due to additional filings, hearings, and potential discovery. Planning and gathering thorough evidence before filing helps limit surprises and keeps costs more predictable. In many cases, a well-prepared petition that addresses institutional requirements and provides clear notice will be resolved more quickly, reducing overall expense compared with protracted disputes or full probate administration. Discussing estimated fees and likely scenarios with counsel before filing helps families understand potential costs and make informed decisions about the best path forward.
Preparing documents for a petition means assembling the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, transfer forms, and any communications that indicate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from those who observed the settlor’s actions, such as family members or advisors, can help fill evidentiary gaps. Also obtain copies of any forms submitted to financial institutions or title companies and request account histories if helpful to trace ownership and transactions. Organizing these materials clearly and labeling exhibits improves the petition’s presentation to the court. Early outreach to institutions to learn their requirements can prevent repeated filings and help prepare an order that addresses specific concerns. Solid document preparation is essential to a focused petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome that enables trustees to manage and distribute trust assets.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas