If you are considering a trust modification petition in Canoga Park, it is important to understand the legal options available and how a petition can help adjust an existing trust to reflect new circumstances. A trust modification petition is often used to correct drafting errors, accommodate changes in family or financial situations, or respond to changes in the law. This page explains the basic concepts, timelines, and steps involved in seeking court approval to modify a trust, and provides practical guidance on gathering documentation and preparing a persuasive petition to present to the court for consideration.
Trust modification petitions require careful drafting and a clear presentation of the reasons for change, along with evidence supporting the requested modification. Whether you are a trustee seeking to adjust trust terms, a beneficiary concerned about changes affecting your interests, or a settlor seeking to clarify intentions, a petition must demonstrate that the modification is appropriate under California law. This section offers an overview of the process, including the types of modifications commonly requested and the kinds of documentation the court will expect to see to evaluate whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent and current needs.
A trust modification petition can preserve the original goal of a trust while allowing necessary adjustments that reflect changed circumstances. Benefits include preventing unintended outcomes, ensuring assets are managed and distributed according to current wishes, and avoiding future disputes among beneficiaries. Properly seeking a modification through the court can protect trustees from liability and clarify responsibilities, while providing beneficiaries with legal assurance that revisions were approved through an appropriate judicial process. Overall, a well-prepared petition balances respect for the settlor’s intent with practical solutions for evolving family or financial challenges.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a long history of assisting clients with estate planning matters, including trust modification petitions, from initial evaluation through representation in court when necessary. Serving clients in California, the firm combines a pragmatic approach to problem solving with careful attention to documentation and court procedure. Attorneys at the firm are experienced in drafting petitions that clearly explain factual changes and proposed legal language, working collaboratively with trustees, beneficiaries, and other counsel to reach solutions that preserve family relationships while protecting legal rights and financial interests.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms of an existing trust. Modifications can address ambiguities, correct mistakes, add or remove beneficiaries, change distribution methods, or alter trustee powers when circumstances have changed substantially since the trust was created. The petition must explain why the change is justified, provide supporting facts, and propose specific amended trust language. Courts consider whether the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent, whether all interested parties have been properly notified, and whether the change promotes fairness and the efficient administration of the trust.
In California, trust modification petitions may be used when the trust instrument allows modifications or when the court finds that conditions warrant judicial approval, such as to address an unanticipated event or resolve a drafting error. The process involves filing a petition in the appropriate probate court, providing notice to interested parties, offering evidence such as declarations or financial statements, and, when necessary, presenting oral argument. Understanding procedural requirements and the types of evidence the court expects will increase the likelihood of a successful outcome and reduce delays and disputes among interested parties.
A trust modification petition is a legal motion asking the court to alter the terms of a trust document for specific, stated reasons. It typically sets forth the history of the trust, the provisions sought to be changed, the factual basis for the requested amendment, and a proposed form of the revised trust terms. The petitioner must identify all parties with an interest, provide adequate notice, and supply factual declarations or other evidence supporting the requested change. The court will review whether the modification preserves the settlor’s intentions as much as possible and whether it serves the trust’s beneficiaries equitably and efficiently.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear explanation of the facts that justify modification, a proposed amended trust instrument or redline showing changes, supporting declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, and a legal argument tied to applicable California probate statutes and case law. Notice to all interested parties is essential, as is documentation of any attempted communications or agreements. Courts may weigh the settlor’s original intent, the effect on beneficiaries, and public policy considerations. Preparing a petition that organizes facts, legal authority, and proposed language clearly helps the court evaluate and rule on the request efficiently.
This glossary explains common terms used in trust modification petitions so petitioners and beneficiaries can better understand filings and court procedures. Definitions include terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, residuary clause, pour-over will, and modification petition among others. Knowing these concepts can help you gather the right documents, identify who must be notified, and understand the potential outcomes of a petition. Clear definitions reduce confusion during the process and provide a foundation for effective communication with counsel and the court.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and whose intent guides the interpretation of trust provisions. In trust modification matters, courts prioritize preserving the settlor’s probable intent unless the settlor’s goals have become impossible to achieve or circumstances have changed in ways that require adjustment. The settlor may still be living or may have passed away; both situations present different procedural considerations. Documentation such as trust declarations, draft language, or related estate planning records can help establish what the settlor intended when the trust was formed.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for administering the trust and carrying out its terms for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests, manage assets prudently, keep accurate records, and follow the trust terms. When a trustee seeks to modify a trust, the petition should demonstrate that the proposed changes help fulfill the trust’s purpose and protect beneficiaries’ interests. Trustees may seek judicial guidance to confirm authority to act or to obtain approval for proposed modifications when the trust instrument does not clearly allow them.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, or other designated recipients. When a modification petition is filed, beneficiaries must generally be notified because the proposed change may affect their interests. Beneficiaries may support, oppose, or request clarifying changes to the petition. Courts weigh the impact on beneficiaries carefully and consider whether notice and an opportunity to be heard were provided before approving any substantive change to a trust.
A pour-over will is a testamentary instrument that directs any assets not already placed in a trust at the settlor’s death to be transferred into the trust, ensuring that the trust ultimately controls distribution. When trust terms are modified, it may be necessary to consider corresponding changes to pour-over wills or other related estate planning documents to maintain consistent administration and avoid unintended results. Reviewing these interconnected documents together ensures that modifications to the trust do not create conflicts or gaps in the overall estate plan.
When circumstances change, trustees and beneficiaries have several potential avenues to address trust issues. Informal agreements among parties can sometimes resolve matters quickly but require cooperation and full disclosure to avoid future disputes. A trust modification petition to the court provides formal approval and a clear record that changes were lawfully authorized. In other cases, remedies such as a reformation action, settlement procedures, or petition for instruction may be more appropriate. Evaluating the relative strengths and risks of each approach helps determine the most practical and durable solution for the situation at hand.
In situations where all interested parties agree on a minor clarification or correction, an informal agreement can be a practical and efficient solution. Examples include correcting typographical errors, clarifying ambiguous wording, or adjusting administrative provisions when beneficiaries and trustees are aligned and communication is transparent. The parties should document the agreement carefully, sign written amendments where permitted by the trust, and, when advisable, obtain a court order or confirmation to avoid challenges later. This approach can save time and expense when cooperation is genuine and documented properly.
When proposed changes are strictly administrative and do not alter beneficiaries’ substantive rights or distributions, a limited approach may be sufficient. Adjustments such as updating trustee contact information, clarifying procedural steps, or making administrative provisions more practical can often be handled without formal court intervention. Even so, careful documentation is essential to show that the change did not affect the core interests of beneficiaries. Transparent communication and written consent from affected parties reduce the risk of future disagreements and help preserve the integrity of the trust.
When requested changes significantly affect beneficiary rights, remove or add beneficiaries, or alter distribution schemes, seeking formal court approval through a petition is often the most secure path. A comprehensive legal approach ensures procedural requirements are met, parties receive proper notice, and supporting evidence is organized for judicial review. Court approval creates a clear legal record that reduces the likelihood of future litigation and provides certainty for trustees and beneficiaries about how the trust should be administered going forward.
If beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes, or if the settlor’s intent is unclear and conflicts arise, a comprehensive legal process can resolve disputes through the court system. Formal petitions provide a neutral forum for presenting evidence, assessing competing claims, and obtaining an enforceable judicial decision. Having a structured legal process helps protect the rights of all parties, ensures that statutory notice and procedural rules are followed, and prevents unilateral actions that could lead to contested litigation down the line.
A comprehensive, court-approved approach to trust modification offers legal clarity and enforceability that informal agreements may not provide. Court approval creates an official record of the change and reduces the risk that a party will later challenge the modification. This pathway protects trustees acting in good faith and ensures that beneficiaries have had notice and an opportunity to object. The formal process also allows the court to weigh competing interests and legal standards, resulting in a solution that is defensible and aligned with the settlor’s probable intent.
Beyond legal certainty, a comprehensive approach can preserve family relationships by providing a neutral resolution when disputes arise. The court review process encourages transparent disclosure of facts and may lead to compromises that all parties accept. Additionally, an authorized modification clarifies the trust’s ongoing administration, reduces ambiguity for successor trustees, and helps prevent future litigation. For families with complex assets or intergenerational issues, obtaining clear judicial authorization can be a prudent step to ensure long-term stability and predictability in trust management.
Court-approved modifications reduce the possibility of future challenges because the change is recorded and validated by a judge. This legal certainty benefits trustees, who gain confidence in carrying out revised instructions, and beneficiaries, who receive assurance that the adjustment was lawfully authorized. The formal record can prevent misunderstandings and discourage later attempts to overturn the modification, making it easier to administer the trust without ongoing disputes. It also helps future fiduciaries who rely on an authoritative court order when implementing the trust terms.
An approved modification provides trustees with clear, court-sanctioned guidance on how to manage and distribute trust assets under the revised terms. This protection reduces the likelihood of trustee liability and gives successors a reliable template for future administration. The clarity afforded by judicial oversight also facilitates interactions with financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties who may require evidence of a lawful amendment. Ultimately, a formal modification streamlines administration and reduces operational friction for trustees acting in good faith.
Start by collecting all relevant documents including the original trust instrument, any codicils or amendments, financial statements, beneficiary communications, and any drafts that reflect the settlor’s intent. Declarations from trustees or beneficiaries explaining changed circumstances can be persuasive when supported by documentary evidence. Early document collection helps identify ambiguities, track prior decisions, and demonstrate the factual basis for a proposed change. Having a well-organized file makes drafting the petition more efficient and reduces delays during court review and discovery.
When asking the court to modify a trust, include clear proposed language or a redlined version of the trust to show exactly how the terms should change. Vague requests are harder for the court to grant and can invite further dispute. Proposed language should be practicable, consistent with the settlor’s overall objectives, and drafted to prevent future ambiguity. Clear drafting reduces the likelihood of unintended consequences and helps the court evaluate whether the modification is reasonable and consistent with the trust’s purposes.
You may consider a trust modification petition when life circumstances or laws have changed since the trust was created, creating outcomes that do not align with current needs. Common reasons include shifts in family dynamics, such as divorce or remarriage, changes in financial circumstances, tax law updates, or errors discovered in the original drafting. A court-approved modification can realign the trust with current intentions while providing legal authority for trustees to act under the revised terms, helping to avoid confusion and potential contests after the change.
Another reason to pursue a modification petition is to address ambiguities or administrative difficulties that impede efficient trust management. For instance, overly rigid distribution provisions or unclear trustee powers can create practical problems that a modification can solve. Seeking judicial approval ensures the revision is recorded and enforceable, which can streamline administration and reduce the risk of contested interpretation. Petitioning the court provides a structured process for resolving competing interests and securing a binding decision that governs future administration.
Common circumstances prompting trust modification petitions include changes in family composition, such as the birth of new grandchildren, deaths, divorce, or remarriage, as well as significant changes in the value or type of trust assets. Other triggers include ambiguous drafting, discovery of drafting errors, changes to tax or trust law, and practical difficulties in administration caused by outdated provisions. In each case, the petition should explain why the modification is justified and provide evidence demonstrating the necessity and proposed impact of the change.
Drafting errors discovered after a trust becomes effective can produce unintended outcomes that contradict the settlor’s probable intent. Ambiguous language may create confusion over beneficiary entitlements or trustee powers, leading to disputes and administrative delays. A trust modification petition can clarify the settlor’s original intentions, correct scrivener errors, or reconcile inconsistent provisions. When filing a petition, present supporting documents and testimony that demonstrate what the settlor intended and why the proposed correction aligns with that intent.
Life events such as divorce, the death of a beneficiary, remarriage, or significant changes in financial status can make a previously appropriate trust arrangement impractical or unfair. Modifying the trust may be necessary to update distribution schedules, remove or add beneficiaries, or change fiduciary powers to better suit current realities. The petition should clearly explain how circumstances have changed and why the requested modifications are reasonable and consistent with the settlor’s goals and the beneficiaries’ legitimate expectations.
Shifts in tax laws or probate rules can affect the effectiveness of previously drafted trust provisions, particularly where tax planning was a central objective. When legal changes create unintended tax consequences or administrative burdens, a petition to modify the trust can realign the document with current law and the settlor’s goals. Demonstrating the legal or financial impact of such changes in the petition helps the court see that modification is necessary to preserve the settlor’s intended benefits for beneficiaries and to avoid adverse fiscal outcomes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers representation and guidance for clients seeking trust modification petitions in Canoga Park and throughout Los Angeles County. Whether you need assistance evaluating whether a petition is warranted, preparing supporting evidence, or pursuing court approval, the firm provides thorough document preparation and procedural support. Services include reviewing existing estate planning documents, preparing a clear proposed amendment, arranging proper notice to interested parties, and managing communication with fiduciaries and beneficiaries to resolve issues efficiently and respectfully.
Choosing representation for a trust modification petition ensures the petition is presented clearly and in compliance with California probate rules. The firm helps organize evidence, draft proposed trust language, and prepare legal arguments that explain how the requested changes align with the settlor’s intent. Legal representation can also help coordinate communications among trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties, reducing the likelihood of misunderstandings and improving the chances of a resolution that meets court standards and protects all parties’ interests.
Representation assists with procedural requirements including proper notice, filing deadlines, and court rules so that petitions are not delayed or dismissed on technical grounds. The firm can also facilitate negotiations among interested parties to reach agreements when appropriate, or, when necessary, advocate before the court to obtain a decisive ruling. Handling the procedural and legal complexities allows trustees and beneficiaries to focus on practical and family considerations while the petition advances through the court system efficiently.
When matters are contentious, legal representation provides a structured approach to resolving disputes through settlement discussions or court proceedings. The firm emphasizes clear communication and documentation to protect fiduciary obligations and reduce the risk of future litigation. By coordinating the petition process with care and attention to detail, representation helps ensure that trust modifications are durable, enforceable, and aligned with the settlor’s underlying goals and the beneficiaries’ legitimate expectations.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a trust modification petition is necessary or whether alternatives may suffice. We identify interested parties, gather evidence, and draft the petition and proposed amended language. We handle statutory notice requirements and strive to resolve contested issues through negotiation when possible. If court intervention is required, we prepare declarations and supporting exhibits and represent clients at hearings to obtain clear judicial approval for the requested modifications.
In the initial stage we review the trust document, related estate planning instruments such as pour-over wills and powers of attorney, and any correspondence or records that shed light on the settlor’s intent. We assess whether the proposed changes are administrative or substantive and recommend a strategy accordingly. This includes advising on possible alternatives, identifying interested parties, estimating likely timelines, and outlining the documentation necessary to support a petition that is persuasive and procedurally sound.
We assist clients in compiling all relevant records including the trust instrument, amendments, financial statements, communications among parties, and any evidence that supports the requested modification. Gathering thorough documentation early helps define the factual foundation of the petition, demonstrates changed circumstances or errors to be corrected, and reduces the risk of surprises during court proceedings. Well-documented petitions are more likely to proceed smoothly and receive favorable consideration from the court.
Identifying and providing notice to all interested parties is essential to a valid petition. We determine who must be served under California probate rules, prepare appropriate notice documents, and ensure proper timing and proof of service. Proper notice gives beneficiaries an opportunity to respond and prevents jurisdictional challenges. It also encourages transparency and can lead to negotiated resolutions when parties are informed and involved from the outset.
Once documents are collected and parties identified, we draft the petition, proposed amended trust language, and supporting declarations. We package exhibits and prepare proof of notice for filing with the probate court. Drafting is focused on clarity and on presenting a logical factual narrative that supports the legal basis for modification. Filing with the court initiates the formal review process and sets the timeline for responses, hearings, and potential rulings on the requested changes.
The petition must explain the grounds for modification, present supporting facts and exhibits, and include a proposed form of the amended trust or redline showing changes. Clear, precise drafting helps the court understand the requested relief and minimizes ambiguities that could lead to additional hearings. Proposed amendments are practical and tailored to the family and financial context to ensure they are workable in day-to-day administration.
After filing, interested parties will be served and may respond or object. We prepare responsive documents and, when appropriate, engage in settlement discussions with opposing parties to resolve disputes before trial. If objections remain, we prepare evidentiary materials and legal arguments to support the petition at hearing. Handling responses tactically can often limit contested litigation and guide parties toward practical resolutions that mitigate time and expense.
If a hearing is necessary, we present the petition and supporting evidence to the probate court, addressing legal and factual issues that arise. The court may grant, deny, or modify the requested relief and will issue an order reflecting its decision. If approved, the court’s order and the revised trust language create an enforceable record of the modification. We ensure that the final order and amended trust are properly recorded and that trustees and beneficiaries receive copies to guide ongoing administration.
We prepare persuasive declarations and organize exhibits so that the court can readily assess the factual basis for the requested change. Oral argument at a hearing focuses on the legal standards and the factual reasons that support modification, emphasizing the settlor’s probable intent and the practical benefits of the change. Clear presentation helps the court reach a well-reasoned decision and reduces the chance of remand or further litigation.
After the court issues its ruling, we assist with preparing the final ordered documents, incorporating the approved amendments into the trust instrument, and ensuring all parties have copies of the new terms. We advise trustees regarding the practical steps for administering the trust under its revised terms, including updating account titles, beneficiary designations where appropriate, and coordinating with financial institutions. Proper implementation ensures the modification achieves its intended effect without unnecessary administrative friction.
Amending and modifying a trust can sometimes be used interchangeably in casual conversation, but there are practical differences that matter in the legal context. An amendment is often a direct written change to the trust instrument made pursuant to the authority granted in the trust document while the settlor is alive and retains the power to alter terms. A modification, particularly when sought by petition, typically refers to a court-approved change made when the settlor cannot or will not amend the trust directly or when the nature of the change requires judicial authorization due to ambiguity or dispute. The petition explains why a judicial remedy is necessary and presents evidence supporting the requested change. Whether an amendment or a modification is appropriate depends on the trust language and the circumstances. When the settlor has retained amendment power and the language permits a straightforward amendment, parties may proceed by executing the amendment according to the trust’s formalities. When the settlor has passed away, lacks capacity, or when beneficiaries dispute the meaning of terms, a modification petition to the probate court provides an authoritative path to revise the trust. Courts consider the settlor’s probable intent, the interests of beneficiaries, and public policy when deciding whether to grant a modification.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in California varies with the complexity of the matter, whether interested parties agree, and the court’s schedule. Simple uncontested matters with thorough documentation and cooperative parties can often be resolved in a few months, allowing time for preparation, proper notice, filing, and a court hearing. Contested matters, especially those involving factual disputes, multiple parties, or complex financial issues, can extend for many months or longer depending on discovery needs and hearing availability. Preparation and attention to procedural details can shorten the process, while objections or incomplete documentation will slow it down. Early collection of records, prompt service on interested parties, and efforts to negotiate or mediate disputes may reduce the need for prolonged litigation. Consulting knowledgeable counsel early helps set realistic expectations and a strategic timeline tailored to the specific case.
California probate rules require notice to be given to all interested persons who have a current or future interest in the trust, including named beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes descendants who may be affected by the change. The required notice forms and methods of service depend on the nature of the petition and the parties involved. Proper notice is essential to ensure that the court has jurisdiction to make a binding decision and to give beneficiaries an opportunity to object or be heard. It is important to identify all potential interested parties early in the process, including contingent beneficiaries, remainder beneficiaries, and certain creditors in some cases. Failing to provide adequate notice can result in delays, additional hearings, or a court declining to approve the petition. Counsel can assist in drafting and serving the required notices and preparing proofs of service for the court file.
A trustee cannot safely make substantive changes to a trust unilaterally unless the trust instrument explicitly grants the trustee that power. Trustees must follow the trust terms and their fiduciary duties, and unilateral alterations to beneficiary rights or distributions can expose a trustee to legal challenge. For administrative changes that clearly fall within trustee authority, written documentation and transparent communication with beneficiaries may be sufficient, but altering core provisions typically requires either settlor approval or court authorization. When doubt exists about the extent of trustee authority, a petition for judicial instruction or modification provides legal protection. Seeking court approval prevents later disputes and shields the trustee from potential liability by obtaining an order that confirms or authorizes the proposed action. This formal route is prudent when changes are material or when beneficiaries might reasonably contest the trustee’s actions.
The court expects factual and legal support for any requested modification, including declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, copies of the trust instrument and related estate planning documents, financial records demonstrating changed circumstances when relevant, and any prior correspondence indicating the settlor’s intentions. If the petition alleges a drafting error, evidence such as drafts, contemporaneous notes, or testimony that sheds light on the settlor’s direction will strengthen the request. The petitioner should present a clear narrative supported by documentation that explains why the modification is necessary and reasonable. Legal authority must also be cited to connect the facts to grounds for modification under California law. The petition should explain how the proposed language aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and why the change will be consistent with the trust’s purposes. Well-organized exhibits and a coherent legal argument make it easier for the court to evaluate the petition and reach a decision.
Modifying a trust can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the trust structure. Changes affecting the allocation of assets, how income is reported, or the treatment of certain tax-advantaged accounts may alter tax obligations. For example, transferring assets into different trust structures or changing beneficiary designations can affect estate or gift tax considerations. Reviewing the tax implications is an important part of planning a modification to avoid unintended tax liabilities or to accomplish tax planning goals effectively. Before implementing significant changes, it is advisable to coordinate with tax counsel or financial advisors to understand the potential tax effects. The petition should disclose any tax planning rationale and demonstrate that the modification aligns with legal and financial goals. Thoughtful coordination helps ensure that the modified trust achieves intended benefits without creating adverse tax consequences for beneficiaries or the estate.
If beneficiaries oppose the proposed modification, the court will consider their objections and the supporting evidence from both sides before ruling. Opposition can lead to contested hearings where parties present declarations, documents, and legal arguments. The court evaluates whether the proposed change respects the settlor’s probable intent, whether proper notice was given, and whether the modification serves fairness and practicality. Persistent opposition may prolong the process and increase cost, but it also helps ensure the court has a comprehensive record on which to base its decision. Often, negotiations or mediation can resolve disputes more quickly than contested hearings. Parties who engage in structured discussions may find compromises that address concerns while preserving most of the intended change. Representation and clear communication about the factual basis for modification can sometimes reduce the intensity of objections and lead to negotiated settlements that the court can later formalize.
Yes, a trust can be modified after the settlor has died when circumstances or ambiguities arise that the settlor did not address or when errors in drafting are discovered. Because the settlor cannot execute an amendment after death, parties often petition the probate court for judicial modification or reformation to correct mistakes, clarify intent, or adapt to changed circumstances. The petition must provide compelling factual support that the proposed change reflects the settlor’s probable intent or is necessary to effectuate the trust’s purpose. Post-death modifications require careful presentation of evidence, including testimony about the settlor’s statements, documentary drafts, and contextual facts that support the requested change. Courts exercise caution to ensure the modification does not override the settlor’s clear intentions and that all interested parties have been given appropriate notice and opportunity to object.
Minor administrative changes that do not alter beneficiary interests may sometimes be implemented without a court order, especially if the trust expressly grants the trustee authority to take such actions. Examples include updating contact information, clarifying procedural items, or correcting non-substantive clerical errors. Even when an amendment is permissible without court involvement, documenting the change carefully and communicating with beneficiaries can prevent misunderstandings and future disputes. When doubt exists about whether a change is substantive, or when parties may later challenge a trustee’s unilateral action, seeking a court order or at least documenting beneficiary consent provides added protection. Courts can issue instructions or approve minor modifications to provide legal certainty and reduce the risk of future litigation over administrative adjustments.
To start the process, gather the trust document and related estate planning materials, make a list of interested parties, and collect any records or correspondence that explain the reasons for the proposed change. Contact counsel to review the documents and advise whether an informal amendment, negotiated agreement, or a formal petition to the probate court is the best path. Early legal input helps identify necessary proof and notice requirements and frames a practical strategy for moving forward. Once the decision to petition the court is made, counsel will help draft the petition, assemble supporting declarations and exhibits, prepare notice and proof of service, and file the petition with the probate court. Counsel can also handle negotiations or represent your interests at hearings to seek an authorized and enforceable modification that achieves the desired outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas