A trust modification petition lets a settlor, trustee, or beneficiary request court approval to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances or intentions change. In Charter Oak and across Los Angeles County, many people turn to this process when a trust no longer matches family dynamics, tax planning needs, or asset management goals. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand when adjustment of a trust is appropriate, what legal standards apply in California, and how a modification can preserve the settlor’s intent while addressing present realities and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Trust modification can arise from many situations: changes in family composition, errors in drafting, tax law changes, or needs arising from incapacity. The petition process in California requires attention to procedural requirements and careful drafting to show the court why modification is warranted and consistent with the settlor’s intent. Whether a modification is pursued to clarify ambiguous provisions, correct technical mistakes, or realign trust terms with current circumstances, a clear plan and thorough documentation reduce delays and avoid disputes among interested parties who may be affected by the proposed change.
Filing a trust modification petition can offer practical and legal benefits, such as updating beneficiary designations, correcting drafting errors, or making the trust respond to changed financial or family circumstances. When handled properly, modifications can prevent future litigation, align asset distribution with current intentions, and improve administration efficiency. For families in Charter Oak and nearby communities, the process can also help clarify the settlor’s wishes and reduce ambiguity that often leads to conflict. A well-prepared petition balances legal formality with sensitivity to relationships and long-term planning objectives, helping preserve family harmony.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services with a focus on trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and related petitions throughout California, including Charter Oak and Los Angeles County. Our firm assists clients with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, special needs trusts, and trust-related litigation such as Heggstad and modification petitions. We aim to deliver clear guidance on procedural steps, documentation, and communication with beneficiaries. Clients can reach our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss how trust modifications may affect their planning and to schedule a consultation about next steps and potential outcomes.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that requests permission to change the terms of a trust when certain legal standards are met. In California, judges consider factors such as the settlor’s intent, the nature of the requested change, and whether interested parties are notified and given an opportunity to object. Modifications can be requested for reasons including mistake, ambiguous language, impossibility of performance, or changed circumstances. The process usually involves drafting the petition, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence or supporting documents that justify the proposed change while honoring the trust’s overall purpose.
Not all trust changes require a court petition. Some modifications can be completed privately when the trust authorizes amendments by the settlor or when all beneficiaries consent. When a court petition is needed, timelines and notice requirements become important, and the petition must clearly explain the grounds for modification and the relief sought. The court evaluates whether the change is consistent with the settlor’s intent or necessary to achieve the trust’s purposes. Preparing a complete petition and providing clear supporting documentation helps streamline the court process and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change specific trust provisions or to permit actions not originally contemplated by the trust document. Typical reasons include correcting drafting errors, addressing changed family or financial circumstances, resolving ambiguities, or fixing provisions that are impossible to carry out. The petition explains why the original terms should be altered and how the change aligns with the settlor’s general intent. Clear evidence, such as contemporaneous drafting notes or extrinsic evidence of intent, often supports the petition. The court will consider the petition in light of statutory rules and the interests of beneficiaries.
Successful petitions typically include a detailed statement of the trust’s background, the specific provisions requested to be modified, and the factual basis supporting the change. Required steps often involve identifying all interested parties, preparing a proposed order or amended trust language, and filing proof of service. The petition should show that the modification serves the trust’s purpose or corrects an error without undermining fundamental settlor intent. In some cases, mediation or negotiated agreements with beneficiaries can limit litigation. Properly assembling documentary evidence and following procedural rules are critical to moving the petition forward efficiently.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process: terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust amendment, and Heggstad petition frequently appear in filings. A clear grasp of these words will help clients follow the petition, recognize their rights to notice and objection, and understand the court’s role. This section provides concise definitions and practical context so clients in Charter Oak and beyond can make informed decisions about whether to pursue a modification and what documentary support will be helpful in court proceedings.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and who originally set the terms and purposes of the trust. In modification proceedings, the settlor’s original intent is central to the court’s analysis, whether the settlor is alive and seeking a change or whether others propose modifications after the settlor’s incapacity or death. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include the trust document itself, related estate planning documents like wills or powers of attorney, and contemporaneous communications or notes. Demonstrating alignment with the settlor’s objectives strengthens the petition’s chances of approval.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to accept assets as part of a trust even if those assets were not properly transferred at the time the trust was created. This petition is often used alongside modification or correction petitions when funding errors occurred. The court evaluates whether the documents and circumstances reflect the settlor’s intention to include the assets in the trust. Successful resolution of a Heggstad petition can clarify title, simplify administration, and ensure that assets are governed by the trust’s terms, reducing the need for separate probate proceedings.
A trust amendment typically refers to changes made according to provisions within the trust that allow the settlor to alter terms without court involvement. Trust modification often implies a court-supervised change when internal procedures are insufficient or when the settlor cannot personally amend the document. Court modification becomes important where there is a dispute, ambiguity, or legal obstacle preventing simple amendment. Understanding this distinction helps clients determine the appropriate path: negotiate an amendment when possible, and petition the court when formal intervention is necessary.
A pour-over will is a legacy tool used with revocable living trusts to transfer any assets not previously funded into the trust at death. In trust modification work, related documents such as revocable living trusts, certification of trust, financial powers of attorney, and advance health care directives are often reviewed to ensure consistency. Changes to a trust may require updating these complimentary documents. Coordinating all estate planning instruments helps maintain a cohesive plan and avoids conflicting instructions that could complicate administration or require further court action.
When contemplating changes to a trust, clients typically consider informal amendments, beneficiary consent-based changes, or filing a court petition. Informal amendments are efficient when the settlor retains amendment power and can act unilaterally. Consent-based changes avoid court but require unanimous beneficiary agreement and clear documentation to prevent later disputes. Court petitions are appropriate when unanimity is lacking, when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when legal issues like mistakes or impossibility arise. Each route has trade-offs in time, cost, and certainty, and choosing the right path depends on the facts and relationships involved.
A limited amendment is often sufficient when the settlor is alive and the trust’s terms expressly permit the settlor to amend or revoke the trust. In these situations, the settlor can execute a written amendment or restatement that memorializes the change without involving the court. This path is generally faster and less expensive, and it preserves privacy. Proper execution and record-keeping are important to ensure the amendment is effective and that the updated trust language is available to successors and trustees responsible for future administration.
A limited approach can also work when all beneficiaries agree to a proposed change in writing. California law allows beneficiaries to consent to modifications in many cases, and unanimous consent can avoid court involvement. Consent should be documented carefully and should address the effect on all relevant trust provisions to avoid future disputes. Even with consent, it is wise to ensure formal amendments or restatements are properly drafted and executed so trustees and successor beneficiaries have clear guidance on the trust’s new terms.
Comprehensive legal action is often necessary where disputes exist among beneficiaries, where trust language is ambiguous, or where the settlor is incapacitated and cannot amend the trust personally. In such cases, court petitions help establish an authoritative resolution and protect the interests of all parties involved. A thorough approach examines related estate planning documents, identifies interested parties, and anticipates potential objections so that the court can make informed decisions. This level of preparation reduces the risk of protracted litigation and protects estate assets from mismanagement or misinterpretation.
When trusts involve complex assets, business interests, or tax-planning features such as irrevocable life insurance trusts or retirement plan trusts, a comprehensive legal strategy ensures modifications maintain intended tax outcomes and asset protections. Changes can have unintended consequences for creditor exposure, tax liabilities, or beneficiary rights, so careful drafting and consideration of ancillary documents are essential. A court petition may be necessary to obtain certainty and document judicial approval of modifications that affect these specialized trust features and long-term tax or asset management objectives.
A comprehensive, court-supported modification provides legal clarity and finality, reducing the likelihood of future challenges and disputes. When the court approves a modification, beneficiaries and trustees can proceed with administration knowing the change has judicial endorsement. This reduces uncertainty for successor fiduciaries and can preserve estate planning goals across time. Comprehensive preparation often includes reviewing related documents such as pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and financial powers of attorney to ensure all instruments remain coordinated after the trust is modified.
Another benefit of pursuing a full, well-documented modification is the protection it affords to trustees who must act according to the trust’s revised terms. Judicial approval minimizes personal liability for trustees and reduces potential conflicts among beneficiaries by settling disagreements through a structured legal process. This path can also be valuable when modifications affect distributions to special needs trusts, pet trusts, or irrevocable arrangements, as the court can tailor relief to preserve established protections and consistent administration of the settlor’s estate plan.
Judicially approved modifications create a clear, enforceable record of the trust’s revised terms, which is helpful for trustees, successor fiduciaries, and beneficiaries. This certainty simplifies administration, reduces the potential for litigation, and provides a reliable roadmap for handling trust assets. A formal court order can resolve disputes and provide direction about the interpretation and implementation of complex provisions, ensuring that trustees can carry out duties with confidence and that beneficiaries understand their rights under the updated trust structure.
Comprehensive modifications protect vulnerable beneficiaries, such as those relying on special needs trusts, and safeguard provisions that affect long-term care planning, tax treatment, or creditor protections. When modifications involve coordinating multiple instruments, like retirement plan trusts or irrevocable life insurance trusts, court oversight ensures changes will not inadvertently undermine protections. This careful approach reduces the chance of adverse consequences for beneficiaries with special needs and helps preserve intended financial safeguards across the trust’s administration.
Before filing a petition, assemble every related estate planning document, including the trust instrument, pour-over will, certifications of trust, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and any correspondence or drafts that bear on the settlor’s intent. Having complete documentation helps clarify the reasons for modification and provides the evidence the court will consider. Organizing records also helps identify interested parties who require notice and ensures the petition will accurately reflect the trust’s history, prior amendments, and any funding gaps that might need a Heggstad petition to resolve.
Consider the broader estate plan when proposing a modification: updates may be needed for related instruments like pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and retirement plan trust arrangements, and changes might create tax considerations. Review beneficiary designations, trust funding, and any provisions involving irrevocable trusts to make sure the modification does not unintentionally alter tax outcomes or protective arrangements. Accounting for these issues up front prevents surprises, helps maintain the settlor’s intent, and ensures the revised trust functions cohesively within the broader estate plan.
Consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, or provisions that cannot be carried out as written. Other common reasons include changes in family structure, addition or removal of beneficiaries, or the need to update distribution terms for tax or asset protection reasons. If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and the trust no longer reflects intended outcomes, a petition can provide judicial clarity. Evaluating the expected benefits against cost and time will help clients decide whether a petition or an alternate route is the best path forward.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when assets intended for the trust were never properly transferred, creating funding gaps that complicate administration. Combining a Heggstad petition with a modification can streamline title issues and prevent separate probate actions. Additionally, when disputes are likely among beneficiaries or when the change affects special arrangements like special needs trusts or irrevocable life insurance trusts, court approval can provide a secure framework for implementation and protect trustees who must act on the trust’s new terms.
Common circumstances include drafting mistakes discovered after execution, beneficiaries contesting language, changes in family relationships such as divorce or remarriage, or newly discovered assets that should be part of the trust. Other triggers include the settlor’s changing health or incapacity, evolving tax rules that affect trust planning, or the need to clarify successor trustee powers. When these issues arise, a trust modification petition can resolve legal uncertainty, align the plan with current needs, and document judicial approval to reduce the chance of future conflict.
Drafting errors or ambiguous language in the trust instrument often prompt petitions to clarify the settlor’s intended meaning. When clauses are unclear, beneficiaries and trustees may interpret provisions differently, risking disputes and misadministration. A petition can ask the court to interpret ambiguous terms or correct mistakes reflected in the document. Providing contemporaneous evidence of intent or related drafts can support the requested correction, and a court-ordered clarification can prevent further disagreement over trust administration and distributions.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant shifts in financial circumstances may make the original trust terms unsuitable. Adjusting distributions, changing trustees, or updating conditions for gifts can be necessary to reflect current realities. A petition provides a formal mechanism to align the trust with these changes when the settlor cannot amend the trust directly or when beneficiary consent is not available. Doing so helps ensure the trust continues to serve its intended purpose under new circumstances.
When assets intended for a trust were never properly transferred, funding gaps can create administration challenges and unintended probate exposure. A Heggstad petition or related court action can resolve title issues by confirming that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite technical defects in transfer. Addressing funding gaps through a petition clarifies asset ownership, simplifies estate administration, and can eliminate the need for separate probate proceedings that would otherwise complicate distribution under the settlor’s plan.
We provide local representation to clients in Charter Oak and Los Angeles County who need help evaluating whether a trust modification petition is appropriate. Our team assists with initial case assessment, assembling documentation, preparing petition drafts, and managing service and court filings. We also communicate with beneficiaries and opposing parties to explore resolution before litigation. For questions or to schedule a consultation, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827. We serve clients throughout the region and coordinate with local counsel as needed for court appearances.
Clients choose our firm for careful handling of trust disputes, modifications, and related estate planning matters. We focus on clear communication, thorough preparation, and practical solutions to minimize delay and expense. Our approach emphasizes documenting the settlor’s intent, coordinating any necessary ancillary documents, and providing guidance on negotiating beneficiary agreements to avoid unnecessary litigation. We work to balance legal rigor with sensitivity to family relationships and long-term planning objectives to achieve outcomes that reflect the settlor’s goals.
From initial consultation through court filings and final orders, our team helps clients navigate the procedural requirements involved in trust modification petitions. We assist with drafting proposed orders, serving interested parties, and assembling evidence to support the requested change. When matters can be resolved by agreement, we help memorialize those agreements in legally reliable documents. If litigation is required, we prepare thoroughly to present the facts and legal arguments that support a favorable resolution while seeking to minimize disruptions to trust administration.
We also coordinate reviews of related instruments such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and powers of attorney to ensure consistency after any modification. Our goal is to provide a seamless update to the estate plan that preserves asset protections and distribution intentions, including arrangements like special needs trusts, pet trusts, and irrevocable life insurance trusts. Clients benefit from a comprehensive approach that looks beyond the immediate modification to the long-term functioning of the estate plan.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and supporting documents to identify the exact nature of the requested change and the interests of all parties involved. We then prepare a petition or draft amendment, advise on notice requirements, and explore opportunities for beneficiary consent. If court intervention is necessary, we file the petition, manage service and responses, and represent the client at hearings. Throughout, we communicate expected timelines, potential outcomes, and steps to preserve assets and administration efficiency while pursuing the desired relief.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the trust, related estate planning documents, and any communications or drafts that shed light on the settlor’s intentions. We identify interested parties, potential funding issues, and whether a simple amendment, beneficiary consent, or court petition is the appropriate route. Gathering clear documentation at this stage allows us to draft a persuasive petition or amendment and anticipate objections, which helps streamline subsequent stages and reduces the likelihood of avoidable delays.
We compile a list of all beneficiaries, successor trustees, and others who must receive notice under California law, and collect evidence supporting the requested modification. This may include prior drafts, correspondence, financial records, or medical documentation if incapacity is relevant. Proper identification and notification are essential for due process and a smooth court review. Early evidence-gathering also helps determine whether beneficiary consent might permit a non-judicial resolution.
During the initial phase we assess whether an amendment or beneficiary agreement could achieve the same result without court involvement. When unanimous consent is realistic and the settlor can act, informal amendment is often faster and private. If consensus is unlikely or the settlor cannot amend the trust, we prepare to file a petition and explain the process to all interested parties. Evaluating alternatives early helps clients weigh cost, timing, and privacy considerations before proceeding.
If a court petition is necessary, we draft the petition with precise proposed language, factual background, and supporting exhibits, then file it with the appropriate probate court. We prepare proposed orders and ensure compliance with California procedural rules, including required forms and filing protocols. Proper service to all interested parties is arranged according to legal requirements so that recipients have fair notice and the opportunity to respond or object within specified timelines.
We prepare exhibits such as the trust document, related estate planning instruments, and any affidavits or declarations that support the petition. A proposed order or redlined trust amendment is included to show the exact form of relief requested. Clear, well-organized supporting documents help the court understand the change sought and the evidence justifying it, which can increase the likelihood of a favorable and timely ruling.
After filing, we arrange proper service on beneficiaries and other interested parties, adhering to statutory notice requirements. If objections arise, we attempt to resolve disputes through negotiation or mediation when appropriate, and we prepare legal responses for matters that require court resolution. Managing service and objections promptly helps avoid procedural pitfalls and supports an efficient hearing process if the matter proceeds to court.
If the petition proceeds to a hearing, we present evidence and legal argument to support the requested modification and respond to objections. The court may approve the petition, deny it, or enter a modified order reflecting compromises or clarifications. Once an order is entered, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, notifying relevant institutions, and coordinating revisions to related documents so administration can proceed smoothly under the revised terms.
Preparing for a hearing involves organizing exhibits, drafting declarations, and outlining the factual and legal basis for the modification. We rehearse testimony and present the factual record in a clear, concise manner that aligns with the court’s standards. Effective presentation focuses on demonstrating consistency with the settlor’s intent, necessity of the change, and fairness to beneficiaries. Thorough preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial determination and clear order.
After an order is entered, implementation includes updating the trust instrument, providing certified copies of the court order to financial institutions and title holders, and coordinating any follow-up filings such as amended certifications of trust. We advise trustees on complying with the order, modifying administration procedures, and documenting actions to minimize future disputes. Proper implementation ensures the settlor’s updated plan is followed and the trust continues to function effectively.
Filing a trust modification petition in California typically requires a petition filed with the probate court that has jurisdiction over the trust. The petition should include the trust document, a clear statement of the relief requested, a factual basis for the modification, and proposed order language or amended trust provisions. Proof of service or planned service to all interested parties is essential. Evidence such as declarations, prior drafts, or communications supporting the settlor’s intent can strengthen the petition and clarify why the requested change is necessary for proper administration. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory standards. Interested parties must receive notice and have an opportunity to object within set timeframes. If objections arise, hearings may be scheduled to resolve disputes. Preparing the petition carefully, including accurate identification of parties and comprehensive supporting exhibits, helps the process move forward efficiently and improves the chance of a clear judicial ruling.
Yes, many trust changes can be made without court involvement when the trust document explicitly permits amendments by the settlor and the settlor is able to act. If the settlor retains amendment power, a formal amendment or restatement can effect the desired changes privately and more quickly than a court petition. Additionally, if all beneficiaries provide informed, written consent, some modifications can proceed without court intervention, provided the consent is properly documented and addresses the impact of the change on all relevant trust provisions. However, when the settlor is incapacitated, deceased, or when unanimity cannot be achieved among beneficiaries, a court petition may be necessary. Certain issues like correcting funding errors or resolving ambiguities often require judicial approval to create a binding resolution. Evaluating whether private amendment, consent, or a petition is the appropriate route depends on the facts, the trust language, and the interests involved.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on the complexity of the issues and whether objections are raised. Straightforward petitions with no objections and complete documentation may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on probate court caseload. The need to serve interested parties, allow time for responses, and schedule a hearing can extend timelines, and courts sometimes require additional briefing or evidence, which adds time to resolution. When objections or disputes occur, the process can take longer, potentially several months to a year or more. Negotiation, mediation, or discovery between parties can lengthen the process, as can the need for multiple court appearances. Early preparation and clear documentation help reduce delays and streamline the court’s review of the petition.
Yes. California law requires notice to interested parties when a trust modification petition is filed so beneficiaries and other interested persons have an opportunity to respond or object. Proper service of the petition and any supporting documents is a legal requirement, and failure to provide notice may delay proceedings or result in the court refusing to act. Identifying and serving all interested parties is an important early step in the petition process to ensure due process and prevent later challenges based on defective notice. Notice typically includes providing copies of the petition, proposed order, and supporting exhibits. The manner of service depends on each recipient’s relationship to the trust and statutory requirements. Keeping thorough records of service and communications with beneficiaries helps demonstrate compliance with notice rules and supports the petition process if objections are raised.
Evidence that supports a trust modification petition includes the original trust instrument, prior drafts or earlier versions showing intent, correspondence with the settlor indicating intended changes, and declarations from people familiar with the settlor’s intent. Medical records or declarations may be relevant if incapacity is part of the justification for the modification. Documents that demonstrate mistakes in drafting or changed circumstances affecting the trust’s operation strengthen the factual basis for the requested relief. Affidavits from trustees or beneficiaries, financial records showing funding gaps, and titles or account statements can also be important, particularly when a Heggstad petition is combined with a modification. Well-organized exhibits and clear narratives explaining how the evidence aligns with the settlor’s intent help the court evaluate the petition efficiently and fairly.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the court to treat certain assets as part of a trust even if they were not formally transferred into the trust at the time of its creation. It is used when the settlor intended for those assets to be governed by the trust but technical defects in transfer occurred. The petition asks the court to recognize the intended trust ownership to prevent assets from passing through probate separately, simplifying administration and honoring the settlor’s plan. Heggstad petitions are often filed alongside trust modification or correction petitions when funding errors are identified. Supporting evidence may include beneficiary designations, account records, or documents indicating the settlor’s intent to include the assets in the trust, and the court assesses whether the circumstances justify treating those assets as trust property despite imperfect transfers.
Modifications can affect special needs trusts and irrevocable trusts, but changes in those areas require careful planning to avoid undermining protections or tax consequences. Special needs trusts are designed to preserve eligibility for government benefits, and altering distributions or ownership could risk those benefits. Irrevocable trusts often have tax or creditor-protection objectives that can be affected by modification. Any proposed change should be evaluated in light of the trust’s purpose and the potential consequences for beneficiaries who rely on specific protections. When proposed modifications touch on these arrangements, judicial oversight can provide assurance that the change preserves necessary protections and intended outcomes. The court can tailor modifications to maintain benefit eligibility or tax treatment, and coordinated updates to related documents help ensure the estate plan continues to perform as intended without unintended adverse effects for vulnerable beneficiaries.
Funding gaps occur when assets intended for a trust were never properly retitled or transferred, creating the risk that those assets will remain outside the trust at the settlor’s death. Resolving these gaps can involve corrective transfers, beneficiary designations, or court petitions such as a Heggstad petition to confirm that assets should be treated as trust property despite technical defects. Addressing funding gaps early avoids probate and simplifies administration under the trust provisions. The appropriate remedy depends on the asset type, timing, and available evidence of intent. For some assets, straightforward retitling is possible. For others, documentation and court approval may be needed to establish trust ownership. A careful review of account records, deeds, and beneficiary designations helps identify the best approach to secure the settlor’s intended plan and minimize administrative complications.
Common objections from beneficiaries include claims that the modification conflicts with the settlor’s true intent, concerns about unfair changes to distribution shares, allegations of undue influence, or disputes over whether proper notice and procedural steps were followed. Beneficiaries may also object if they believe changes will harm their financial position or remove protections previously available to them. Raising timely, documented objections can lead to hearings where the court evaluates the merits of the petition and the evidence presented by all sides. Resolving objections often involves negotiation, mediation, or court hearings where factual records and legal arguments are presented. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent, fairness to beneficiaries, and statutory criteria. Preparing a well-supported petition, communicating with beneficiaries, and documenting efforts to reach agreement can reduce the likelihood of protracted disputes and help the court resolve contested matters more efficiently.
Court-approved modifications establish a clear legal basis for trustees to act according to the revised terms, reducing personal liability for decisions made under the modified trust. Once the court issues an order, trustees should update trust records, provide required notices, and implement the new provisions in administration. A judicial order gives trustees confidence that their actions comply with the court’s determination and protects them from claims that they misapplied trust terms. Trustees must follow the court order and update related documentation, such as certifications of trust and account titles, to reflect the change. They should also maintain careful records of distributions and administration steps taken under the revised trust. When trust modifications affect beneficiary entitlements or administration processes, clear communication with beneficiaries and institutions reduces confusion and helps ensure the trust operates smoothly under the new terms.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas