If you are considering a trust modification petition in Compton, this page explains what a petition involves, who may file one, and how the process typically unfolds. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist individuals and families with matters related to estate planning and trust administration throughout California. A trust modification petition seeks court permission to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances require amendment, clarification, or correction. This overview will prepare you to make informed choices about whether a petition is appropriate and what steps are likely to follow, including documentation and timelines.
A trust modification petition can address a wide range of situations: changes in beneficiaries, tax considerations, correcting drafting errors, adapting to changed family circumstances, or responding to new legal or financial realities. The petition process usually begins with a careful review of the trust instrument, relevant communications, and any related estate planning documents. Understanding the grounds for modification, required notices to interested parties, and potential objections will help you anticipate outcomes. Our goal is to present clear information about your options in Compton and how to move forward thoughtfully under California law.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the original intent of the trust while adapting it to new facts, such as changed relationships, unexpected tax consequences, or drafting mistakes. When parties and circumstances evolve, a petition allows the court to approve changes that keep the trust functional and legally enforceable. Benefits include resolving ambiguities, preventing disputes among beneficiaries, and ensuring that management of trust assets remains consistent with current needs. A well-prepared petition also encourages transparent communication with interested parties and reduces the risk of prolonged litigation by addressing contested issues early in a court-supervised setting.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services across California, including handling trust modification petitions in the Los Angeles County area. Our approach focuses on careful document review, clear communication with clients and interested parties, and practical strategies that aim to resolve disputes and secure appropriate court orders. We work with clients to gather relevant records, draft persuasive petitions, and manage required notices and filings. The firm takes a problem-solving approach tailored to each family’s circumstances, emphasizing sensible outcomes that protect assets and honor the settlor’s intentions.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to alter, interpret, or reform the terms of an existing trust when certain legal or factual conditions are present. Grounds for modification can include a mutual mistake in drafting, changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, ambiguous language needing judicial interpretation, or the settlor’s subsequent communications that clarify intent. The court weighs the petition against statutory requirements and the interests of beneficiaries. Preparing a petition requires thorough factual documentation, legal authority, and thoughtful notice to interested parties so the court can reach a fair resolution for all stakeholders.
Some modifications are relatively straightforward, while others can trigger objections from beneficiaries or trustees. The court may permit a modification if it finds clear and convincing evidence of the settlor’s intent, or if the change aligns with statutory criteria for reformation or modification. Timing, standing, and the presence of a conservatorship or incapacity issues can affect the process. Parties should expect a period of investigation, drafting, and potential negotiation before filing. The court’s role is to ensure that any approved modification serves the settlor’s intentions and complies with California trust law protections for beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms of a living trust or other trust instrument. The petition outlines the requested changes and the legal and factual reasons supporting them, such as mistakes in the original drafting, changed circumstances, or evidence that the settlor’s true intent differed from the trust document’s language. Courts may reform trusts to reflect intent when there is clear evidence, or they may modify agreements in accordance with statutory authority. The process is designed to clarify ownership, distribution, or administrative provisions while safeguarding beneficiary rights and preserving estate planning goals.
A trust modification petition typically includes a statement of the trust’s background, the specific provisions to be changed, supporting evidence such as drafts or communications, and the relief requested from the court. The petitioner must serve notice to interested parties and allow an opportunity for responses or objections. The court may hold hearings, consider evidence, and then issue an order approving or denying the requested changes. Document preparation, evidence gathering, and clear articulation of legal grounds are essential steps in presenting a persuasive petition while respecting the rights of beneficiaries and trustees throughout the process.
Understanding core terms helps clarify the petition process. Common phrases include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, and cy pres doctrine. Familiarity with these concepts allows clients to follow procedural steps, participate in mediation or hearings, and understand how proposed changes may affect distribution and administration. Knowing the roles of interested parties and the significance of evidentiary standards is especially helpful when disputes arise. This section defines essential terms and explains how they apply to petitions to modify trust terms under California law, offering practical context for planning and decision-making.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intentions, as evidenced by the trust document and supporting records, are central when a court considers a petition to modify or reform a trust. Courts look to the settlor’s expressed intent and surrounding circumstances to determine whether a proposed change would align with the original purpose. When the settlor is alive and able to express intent, certain modifications may be permissible without court petition, but when clarity is lacking or when parties disagree, a court-supervised petition often provides a definitive resolution.
Reformation refers to a judicial change to the language of a trust to reflect the true intent of the settlor when the document as written contains a mistake or drafting error. Reformation requires evidence showing that the parties had a different agreement than what was memorialized, or that the language fails to express the actual intent due to inadvertent error. The court examines written communications, drafts, and other relevant records to determine whether reformation is appropriate. The remedy corrects the instrument while preserving the settlor’s underlying plan for distribution and management of assets.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets, carrying out administrative duties, and distributing property according to the trust’s terms. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudence. In modification proceedings, a trustee may be named as a party and may need to provide accountings or evidence about administration. Courts expect trustees to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and to cooperate with lawful petitions that resolve ambiguity or correct errors, while ensuring that proposed changes do not unfairly disadvantage protected beneficiaries under trust law.
Beneficiaries are individuals or organizations entitled to receive trust benefits. Their interests are protected by statutory notice requirements and judicial oversight during modification petitions. Only parties with standing—typically beneficiaries, trustees, or the settlor if alive—may bring certain claims or file petitions. Beneficiaries may object to proposed changes that reduce their interests or alter distribution timing. Courts balance the need to honor the settlor’s intent with statutory protections for beneficiaries, often requiring clear evidence when a modification would materially affect beneficiary rights.
When considering changes to a trust, parties can pursue different routes depending on the nature and scope of the requested alteration. A limited correction addresses specific errors or ambiguities without changing the trust’s overall structure, while a full modification may alter beneficiary designations, dispositive provisions, or administrative terms. Alternatives such as trust decanting, nonjudicial settlement agreements, or successor trustee actions may be viable in some cases. Choosing the appropriate path requires evaluating the trust document, stakeholder positions, and potential objections, with an aim to achieve a durable solution that minimizes conflict and complies with California law.
Limited corrections are often sufficient when a trust contains inadvertent drafting mistakes such as typographical errors, incorrect dates, or misnamed beneficiaries that do not alter the settlor’s essential plan. In these situations, a petition or a stipulated approach can clarify intended meanings and correct the record without changing the substantive distribution scheme. The court will examine drafts, correspondence, and other evidence to confirm that the correction reflects the settlor’s original intent. Resolving such errors promptly can prevent misunderstandings and reduce the risk of contested litigation among beneficiaries or fiduciaries.
Sometimes trust provisions contain ambiguous language that leads to differing interpretations among trustees and beneficiaries. A limited approach that seeks judicial clarification can provide authoritative guidance without broader changes to the trust. Courts can construe unclear terms, specify distribution timing, or confirm administrative duties to resolve disputes. Clarification helps trustees follow a clear directive, reduces the likelihood of future disagreements, and protects beneficiaries’ interests by ensuring the trust operates as intended despite imprecise wording in the instrument.
Comprehensive court-supervised modification may be necessary when proposed changes affect primary distribution provisions, remove or add beneficiaries, or alter the fundamental purposes of the trust. These types of petitions raise substantive concerns about fairness and intent, and they often involve multiple interested parties with conflicting positions. A full petition allows the court to review all evidence, hear objections, and issue an enforceable order that resolves competing claims. This process provides finality and ensures that major changes are made in a manner consistent with applicable statutes and beneficiary protections.
When adjustments involve tax consequences, retirement accounts, or significant asset transfers, comprehensive legal work is often required to evaluate the consequences and secure appropriate court approval. These matters demand careful analysis of tax law, creditor considerations, and potential unintended impacts on beneficiaries. Courts may need to weigh the broader effects of proposed modifications, and trustees must ensure compliance with fiduciary duties while protecting the estate’s financial interests. A thorough approach helps manage risk and aligns modifications with long-term financial objectives.
A comprehensive approach under court supervision can resolve complex disputes, produce a binding order that settles competing claims, and protect all parties through formal procedures and notice requirements. By bringing all interested parties into the process, a petition can prevent later challenges and provide clarity for trustees tasked with administration. The court’s involvement often lends finality, ensuring that changes take effect with judicial authority. For families facing contested issues or complex financial considerations, a comprehensive petition can create a workable solution that minimizes future litigation and stabilizes trust administration.
Another benefit of a comprehensive process is the ability to address multiple related legal issues in a single proceeding, such as accounting disputes, trustee removals, or requests for instructions. Consolidating matters reduces duplicative litigation and streamlines resolution, saving time and resources over the long term. Comprehensive petitions also allow the court to tailor remedies to the unique circumstances of the trust, crafting orders that balance the settlor’s intention with equitable treatment of beneficiaries. This integrated approach helps families move forward with a clear plan for estate management and distribution.
When a court approves a trust modification petition, it issues an enforceable order that resolves disputes and clarifies administration going forward. This judicial determination reduces the likelihood of subsequent challenges and gives trustees confidence to carry out distributions consistent with the ruling. Finality is particularly important when changes involve significant assets, contested beneficiary claims, or ongoing management concerns. With a court-approved modification, trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with reduced uncertainty, knowing the order reflects a legally binding resolution of contested issues under California law.
A comprehensive petition creates an opportunity to address multiple related issues simultaneously, such as clarifying trust terms, resolving accounting disputes, and handling trustee conduct or removal. Coordinated resolution simplifies administration by consolidating disputes and reducing the administrative burden of separate actions. This efficiency can decrease legal costs over time and reduce emotional strain on family members by limiting prolonged conflict. The court’s integrated view of all issues often leads to more balanced outcomes that preserve estate value and respect the settlor’s intentions while safeguarding beneficiary rights.
Begin by collecting all versions of the trust instrument, drafts, related estate planning documents such as the pour-over will, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, correspondence showing intent, and records of asset transfers into the trust. Comprehensive documentation strengthens a petition by providing evidence of the settlor’s intent and showing the chain of events that led to the requested change. Early organization also helps identify interested parties who must be notified and facilitates clearer communication, which can reduce misunderstandings and streamline the court process.
Explore nonjudicial solutions such as mediated agreements, trustee-led clarifications, or nonjudicial settlement agreements when appropriate, because these alternatives may resolve issues with less cost and delay. However, when disagreements persist or when the requested change affects fundamental distributional terms, a court petition may be the better option to obtain a binding resolution. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine whether a formal petition is necessary and allows parties to prepare for the procedural and evidentiary requirements if court action is the chosen path.
You might consider a petition if the trust contains errors, ambiguous language, or if changed circumstances make original provisions impractical or unfair to beneficiaries. Situations such as a beneficiary’s death, disability, remarriage, or changed tax laws can alter the effectiveness of a trust as originally drafted. A petition can also address administrative issues, clarify trustee powers, or resolve disputes over distributions. Evaluating the potential benefits and consequences of a modification requires a careful review of the trust document and consideration of interested parties’ rights under California law.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to reconcile conflicting documents or to give the court authority to correct drafting mistakes that could otherwise invalidate important provisions. When the settlor’s probable intent can be supported by evidence such as drafts, letters, or contemporaneous notes, a petition may persuade the court to reform the instrument to reflect that intent. In contested situations, a court proceeding also provides structured notice and an opportunity for all parties to be heard, helping achieve an enduring resolution.
Common circumstances include unclear beneficiary designations, errors in property descriptions, changes in family structure, or actions by trustees that require clarification or judicial instruction. Additionally, tax planning needs or the discovery of assets not previously included in the trust may necessitate modifications. When distributions are affected by external events such as creditor claims or changes in law, a petition can align trust administration with present realities. Identifying the specific circumstance helps determine whether a limited correction, nonjudicial settlement, or full court petition is most appropriate.
Ambiguities or conflicting provisions between drafts and final trust instruments often lead to litigation or petition filings. When language is unclear about distribution timing, beneficiary classes, or trustee authority, interested parties may disagree on interpretation. A petition asking the court to construe or reform the trust can provide a definitive ruling. Presenting evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, and contemporaneous notes strengthens the case for correction and reduces the likelihood of further disputes by offering an authoritative statement of the settlor’s intent.
Life events such as marriages, divorces, births, deaths, or changes in a beneficiary’s financial or medical needs can justify trust modifications to reflect new realities. These changes may alter the appropriateness of original distributions or the designation of fiduciaries. A petition can adapt the trust to serve current family circumstances while maintaining essential planning goals. Courts consider the settlor’s probable intent and the fairness of proposed alterations, aiming to balance the needs of beneficiaries with the trust’s original purposes under applicable law.
Shifts in tax law or financial circumstances sometimes require updates to a trust to preserve estate value or achieve intended tax outcomes. A petition can authorize changes that align the trust with updated strategies for asset protection, retirement account handling, or insurance trusts such as an irrevocable life insurance trust. When proposed changes affect significant assets or tax positions, court approval can provide certainty and documentation that the modification was made in accordance with legal standards and the settlor’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in Compton and surrounding communities with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We focus on practical solutions that address drafting errors, changing family circumstances, beneficiary disputes, and tax-related concerns. Our team helps gather evidence, prepare petitions, and manage notifications to interested parties. Whether you are seeking a limited clarification or a comprehensive court-supervised modification, we aim to guide you through the procedural steps and help secure an outcome that preserves estate value and honors the settlor’s likely intentions.
Choosing legal counsel for a trust modification petition means working with a firm comfortable navigating probate procedures, notice requirements, and evidentiary standards. We provide clients with clear guidance on documentation, possible outcomes, and procedural timelines. Our approach centers on careful preparation of petitions and strategic communication with interested parties. We work to resolve disputes where possible and to present compelling legal arguments when court action is necessary, helping clients achieve durable solutions that reduce the risk of future challenges.
We also assist trustees and beneficiaries in managing the practical aspects of a petition, including compiling records, coordinating service of process, and preparing declarations and exhibits. Attention to procedural detail is essential to avoid objections based on technical grounds. Our goal is to present a complete and organized petition that allows the court to focus on merits rather than procedural issues. We strive to keep clients informed and to pursue outcomes that protect assets and reflect the settlor’s intentions within the framework of California law.
When disputes arise, our priority is to pursue solutions that conserve estate resources and reduce family conflict. That may include negotiation, mediated settlement, or stipulated modifications when appropriate. If litigation is necessary, we prepare thoroughly to present evidence in court. Throughout the process we aim for transparency, timely communication, and practical recommendations so that clients in Compton and throughout Los Angeles County can move forward with confidence and clarity about the trust’s administration and future distributions.
Our process begins with a consultation to understand the trust instrument, the desired changes, and the perspectives of interested parties. We review documents, identify necessary evidence, and outline potential strategies including nonjudicial options. If a court petition is required, we prepare the petition, gather supporting declarations and exhibits, and handle service of process to beneficiaries and trustees. We then represent clients at hearings, respond to objections, and work toward a settlement or court order. Throughout, we maintain communication about timelines, likely costs, and possible outcomes under California law.
The first formal step is a detailed review of the trust document and related records to identify the grounds for modification and the evidence needed to support the petition. This includes locating earlier drafts, communications, funding records, and any documents that show the settlor’s intent. We also identify all interested parties who require notice and potential witnesses for hearing. Thorough evidence gathering at this stage increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution and reduces the chance of procedural surprises during court proceedings.
We assist clients in collecting all relevant documents, which may include the trust instrument, prior drafts, wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, trust certifications, and asset transfer records. Analyzing these materials helps establish the settlor’s intent and provides a factual foundation for the petition. We also identify any inconsistencies that require clarification. A methodical document review prepares the client for possible negotiation or litigation by clarifying strengths and potential challenges in the case.
Once documents are reviewed, we identify beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties who must receive notice under California law. Proper notice is essential to avoid procedural challenges and to give parties an opportunity to respond or negotiate. We prepare clear notices and manage service to ensure compliance with statutory timelines. Early notification also helps surface potential objections sooner, allowing for discussions or alternative dispute resolution before contested hearings become necessary.
After evidence is compiled and interested parties are identified, we draft a petition that outlines the requested changes, the factual basis for modification or reformation, and the legal authorities supporting relief. The petition is accompanied by declarations, exhibits, and proposed orders. We file the petition in the appropriate probate court, serve required parties, and monitor deadlines for responses. Clear, well-documented filings help the court evaluate the request efficiently and reduce the scope for procedural objections that could delay resolution.
Supporting documentation commonly includes sworn declarations from witnesses, copies of relevant drafts or correspondence, and evidentiary exhibits showing the settlor’s intent or the circumstances justifying modification. Declarations must be precise, factual, and connected to the legal claims in the petition. We help clients prepare declarations that are persuasive and comply with evidentiary rules, ensuring the court has the material it needs to decide whether a change to the trust is appropriate under the law.
Once the petition and supporting materials are assembled, we file the documents with the probate court and provide service to all required parties. Proper filing and service establish the court’s jurisdiction and allow interested parties to appear or object. We track response deadlines and prepare for potential opposition by evaluating likely arguments and identifying resolution strategies. Timely and accurate filing minimizes unnecessary delays and preserves options for settlement or hearing as the case proceeds.
After filing and service, courts may set hearings to consider the petition, allowing parties to present arguments and evidence. Many matters resolve through settlement or stipulated agreements before a contested hearing. If contested, the court will evaluate evidence and issue an order granting or denying the requested modification. The court’s order may reform language, modify provisions, or provide instructions for trust administration. We represent clients during hearings and advocate for orders that reflect sound legal reasoning and the settlor’s probable intent.
Mediation and negotiation are often productive ways to resolve disputes without a full hearing. We assist clients in negotiating settlements that protect beneficiaries’ interests and preserve estate value. Through mediation, parties can reach mutually acceptable resolutions that a court can then formalize. Settlements can be faster and less expensive than contested litigation, and they may maintain family relationships by reducing adversarial conflict. When mediation succeeds, we prepare the stipulation or agreement for court approval and finalize the order.
If a petition proceeds to hearing, we present evidence and legal arguments supporting the requested modification. The court will evaluate declarations, exhibits, and testimony as needed before issuing a final order. The order may reform, modify, or construe the trust instrument and provide instructions for administration going forward. After the order is entered, parties and trustees act in accordance with the court’s directives. Final orders help ensure predictable administration and reduce the potential for subsequent litigation over the same issues.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court to alter, reform, or clarify the terms of an existing trust when circumstances or evidence show the document does not reflect the settlor’s intent or practical needs. Typical reasons include drafting mistakes, ambiguous language, significant life changes among beneficiaries, or tax and financial considerations that require judicial approval. The petition explains the requested change, presents supporting documents, and identifies interested parties who must be notified under California law. When a petition is appropriate, it provides a structured legal forum to resolve disputes, correct errors, or adjust trust administration. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order that becomes part of the trust record. Petition outcomes vary based on the strength of the evidence and the presence of objections, but the process ensures that modifications are made transparently and with notice to beneficiaries and trustees.
In California, parties with standing such as beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes the settlor may file petitions related to trust modification or reformation. Trustees may seek instructions from the court when uncertainties arise in administering the trust. Beneficiaries may petition to reform a trust if they can present evidence showing the trust does not accurately reflect the settlor’s intent. The court will only act when proper notice is provided and when statutory requirements for standing and procedural compliance are met. Before filing, identifying all interested parties is essential because the court requires notice to those who have legal or financial interests. Failure to provide proper notice can lead to procedural delays or dismissal. Attorneys help ensure that petitions are properly brought by those with standing and that notice and service of process are completed in accordance with court rules.
The timeline for a trust modification petition can vary widely depending on the complexity of the issues, the need for discovery, and whether parties agree through negotiation or require contested hearings. Simple petitions that clarify a drafting error and encounter no opposition may be resolved in a matter of months, while contested matters involving multiple beneficiaries, complex financial issues, or extensive evidence gathering can take longer. Court schedules and local probate calendar congestion also affect timelines. To keep the process moving, early document collection, clear communication with interested parties, and prompt service of process are important. Exploring mediation or settlement options can shorten the timeline significantly. When litigation is necessary, preparing strong declarations and exhibits and responding timely to court deadlines helps avoid unnecessary delays and positions the case for resolution as efficiently as possible.
Evidence supporting a trust reformation or modification petition often includes earlier drafts of the trust, correspondence or notes showing the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous records of conversations, and documents demonstrating the circumstances that justify change. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent and relevant financial records can be persuasive. The court looks for a factual basis linking the evidence to the claimed mistake, ambiguity, or changed circumstance. Organized, credible documentation improves the likelihood of a favorable decision. Evidence should be gathered and presented in a clear, chronological manner so the court can follow the history of the trust’s drafting and administration. Properly prepared declarations and exhibits make the factual narrative understandable and support the legal arguments needed for reformation or modification.
Yes, beneficiaries may object to proposed modifications if they believe the change reduces their interest or departs from the settlor’s intent. When objections are raised, the court will consider the opposing evidence and hold hearings as needed. Objections can prompt settlement negotiations or lead to a contested hearing where both sides present declarations, documentary evidence, and arguments in support of their positions. An objection does not automatically block a modification, but it does require the petitioner to present stronger evidence and legal reasoning. Courts balance the need to honor the settlor’s probable intent with protections for beneficiary rights, and the resolution will depend on the strength of the evidence and applicable legal standards under California law.
Alternatives to court petitions include nonjudicial settlement agreements, trust decanting where permissible, and negotiated clarifications among beneficiaries and trustees. Mediation or settlement discussions can resolve disputes quickly and reduce costs when parties are willing to cooperate. Trustees may also take administrative steps within their authority to address minor issues, provided those actions do not exceed their powers or harm beneficiary interests. However, when parties cannot agree or when the change would alter significant distribution provisions or correct major drafting errors, court-supervised petitions provide binding resolution and formal notice. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine whether a nonjudicial route is feasible or if a petition is required to achieve a durable solution.
A court-ordered modification can affect the tax treatment of trust assets depending on the nature of the change. Modifications that alter dispositive provisions or change ownership may have tax consequences such as triggering recognized income, affecting estate tax exposure, or impacting the tax basis of assets. When tax consequences are likely, careful planning and consultation with tax professionals are advisable before seeking court approval. The court may be asked to consider tax implications as part of the petition, and trustees should disclose relevant financial information. Preparing the petition with an understanding of potential tax outcomes can help ensure that the requested change aligns with broader financial planning goals and minimizes unintended tax burdens for beneficiaries or the estate.
Trustees play a central role in the modification process because they administer trust assets and owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries. A trustee may petition the court for instructions or to reform the trust when faced with ambiguous provisions or uncertain duties. Trustees must balance the settlor’s intent and the practical needs of administration while ensuring proper notice to beneficiaries and compliance with fiduciary obligations. If trustees oppose a proposed modification, their position carries weight in court proceedings and may lead to contested hearings. Trustees must document their decisions, cooperate with discovery, and, when appropriate, support reasonable changes that clarify administration while protecting beneficiary interests. Courts expect trustees to act in good faith and to seek judicial guidance when uncertain.
Common grounds for court approval include demonstrated drafting errors, mutual mistake, ambiguity in dispositive language, or changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose. Reformation may be appropriate when evidence shows the settlor’s intent differed from the written instrument. Modification may also be justified under statutory provisions that permit alterations to achieve the settlor’s probable intent without harming beneficiary protections. Courts evaluate whether proposed changes reflect the settlor’s intentions or are necessary to preserve the trust’s purpose. Strong documentary evidence, consistent testimony, and a clear showing of why clarification or reformation is needed improve the chance of court approval, particularly when beneficiaries’ rights are carefully considered and protected throughout the process.
To begin, gather relevant trust documents, drafts, correspondence, and records of asset transfers, then schedule a consultation to review the facts and determine whether a petition is likely needed. Early assessment helps identify whether a limited clarification, a negotiated settlement, or a court petition is the best path. Clear documentation of the settlor’s intent and the reasons for change will be essential in evaluating options and preparing any necessary filings. After initial review, the next steps typically include identifying interested parties who require notice, compiling supporting declarations and exhibits, and discussing potential strategies. If a petition is appropriate, we help prepare and file the petition, coordinate service, and represent your interests at hearings or in settlement negotiations to seek a timely and durable resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas