A Heggstad petition can be an important tool when assets were transferred to a trust but a court must recognize a beneficiary’s continued interest for probate or other legal purposes. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist California residents with the procedural and practical steps involved in pursuing a Heggstad petition in Los Angeles County. This guide explains when the petition is appropriate, what the court considers, and how to present clear documentation. If property was transferred into a trust and your interest needs confirmation in probate or related proceedings, understanding the petition process is the first step toward protecting your rights.
A Heggstad petition often arises when assets intended to pass under a decedent’s will or through probate appear to have been moved into a trust, and a party needs the court to declare what property should be included in an estate or probate distribution. The petition asks the court to treat transferred assets as if they had remained in the decedent’s estate for the limited purpose of probate administration or distribution. For family members, trustees, and other interested persons, clear allegations and supporting evidence are necessary. This page describes key factors, common scenarios, and the typical court responses in Culver City and across California.
Filing a Heggstad petition can resolve disputes about whether certain assets should be included in probate or recognized as having been effectively transferred to a trustee. The primary benefit is clarity: the court can deem property to be part of the probate estate for distribution or to effect certain creditor claims, guardianship matters, or other pending estate issues. For beneficiaries and fiduciaries, a successful petition can prevent delays in administration, protect inheritance interests, and ensure proper handling of assets that were transferred under ambiguous circumstances. The petition also helps courts reconcile competing documents and historical actions regarding trust transfers and estate plans.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and probate representation for individuals and families across California, combining practical estate administration with litigation experience when disputes arise. Serving clients in Culver City and beyond, the firm addresses matters including revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and post-death petitions such as Heggstad petitions and trust modification petitions. We focus on clear communication, careful documentation, and a strategic approach tailored to each client’s needs. Our approach is client-centered and aims to resolve matters efficiently while protecting the lawful interests of beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request asking the court to find that certain property, though transferred to a trustee, should be treated as if it was part of the decedent’s probate estate for specific purposes. This procedure often arises when records are inconsistent or when a transfer was made near the time of death and there is a question about the transferor’s intent. Courts will examine documentation, title records, testimony, and the totality of circumstances. The goal is not to reassign ownership broadly, but to clarify how the property should be treated for administration, creditor claims, or distribution under existing estate documents.
In practice, a Heggstad petition requires careful factual development and supporting evidence. Relevant elements can include the timing of transfers, whether the transferor retained control or made complementary estate planning documents like a pour-over will, and whether the transfer aligns with the overall estate plan. The petitioner must present a coherent narrative and documentary proof to persuade the probate court. Courts in California will balance competing considerations, such as the named beneficiaries of a trust against those named in a will, and will aim to effectuate the decedent’s intent while complying with statutory probate procedures.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that specific property transferred to a trust should be treated as part of the decedent’s estate for probate purposes. This may be necessary when transfers are incomplete, made informally, or when documentation suggests the transferor intended probate treatment despite the trust transfer. The petition often cites evidence such as transfer documents, bank records, title changes, and witness testimony to establish the context of the transfer. The remedy is narrowly tailored: the court’s declaration typically applies to probate administration, creditor claims, or distribution, rather than changing underlying trust ownership broadly.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts consider several factors, including the timing and manner of the transfer, the transferor’s intent, supporting documentary evidence, and whether the transfer was cumulative with other estate planning instruments such as a pour-over will. The petition must be accompanied by precise allegations and exhibits that trace the asset’s history. Courts also assess whether treating the asset as part of the probate estate will affect creditors or other interested parties. Effective petitions frame the issue clearly and supply the required legal authority and factual proof to justify the requested declaration.
Understanding common terms in Heggstad petitions helps demystify the process and prepares petitioners and interested parties for the documentation and arguments the court will expect. Definitions cover trust and probate vocabulary, types of transfers, and procedural concepts such as notice, jurisdiction, and evidentiary standards. Becoming familiar with these terms can make it easier to gather records, draft persuasive pleadings, and anticipate responses from other parties. Below are concise definitions of frequent terms encountered in Heggstad matters in California probate courts.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that requests a judicial declaration that property transferred to a trust should nonetheless be treated as part of the decedent’s estate for purposes of probate administration, creditor claims, or distribution. The petition identifies the property at issue, explains the basis for treating it as part of the estate, and provides supporting evidence. The remedy is intended to resolve uncertainty about whether a transfer was intended to exclude property from probate or whether it should be regarded as part of the estate for specific legal purposes.
Transfer documentation includes deeds, account change forms, beneficiary designation forms, trust instruments, bank statements, and any correspondence evidencing the movement of assets into a trust. These records are essential in a Heggstad petition because they help establish the timing, manner, and intent behind transfers. Clear and contemporaneous documentation strengthens a petition, while gaps or conflicting records increase the likelihood of contested proceedings. Accurate title records and authenticated bank documents are among the most persuasive evidence a petitioner can provide to the court.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name at death into a trust named in the will. It functions as a safety net for assets that were not previously transferred to the trust during the decedent’s lifetime. In Heggstad matters, the existence of a pour-over will can demonstrate an intent to unify an estate plan and may be relevant to whether certain assets should be treated as part of the probate estate for distribution purposes.
The probate estate comprises assets that are subject to court-supervised administration after a person’s death. These assets are distributed according to a will or state intestacy laws if no will exists. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the question is whether assets that appear to have been transferred to a trust should nevertheless be treated as part of the probate estate for limited purposes, such as creditor claims or satisfying bequests under a will. The probate court’s declaration guides administrators and beneficiaries on how to proceed.
When confronting transfers into a trust that intersect with probate matters, interested persons can consider several approaches in addition to a Heggstad petition. Alternatives may include negotiating with trustees and beneficiaries, pursuing reformation or constructive trust claims in broader litigation, or seeking a declaratory relief action in civil court depending on the circumstances. Each option has trade-offs in terms of time, cost, and remedy scope. A Heggstad petition offers a targeted procedural vehicle within probate court that directly addresses the status of specific assets for estate administration, often providing a focused and efficient path to resolution.
A targeted Heggstad petition often suffices when asset transfers into a trust are recent or accompanied by documentation that leaves only a narrow legal question about probate treatment. If title changes, bank records, or a pour-over will indicate an intent consistent with the decedent’s estate plan, and there are no substantial competing claims, a focused petition can prompt the court to clarify the asset’s status without prolonged litigation. In such cases, the matter can be resolved efficiently by presenting clear evidence and concise legal arguments that align with California probate law and established case precedent.
When beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties agree on how an asset should be treated, a Heggstad petition can formalize that understanding and provide judicial confirmation to prevent later disputes. Agreement reduces contested motion practice and shortens the timeline in probate court. The court will still review the evidence and legal basis, but cooperative filings supported by consistent documentation often streamline the process and minimize legal expenses. This cooperative approach can be particularly effective where the factual record is complete and the requested remedy merely clarifies treatment for estate administration.
Comprehensive legal action may be necessary when transfers are disputed, documentation is inconsistent, or multiple parties claim interests that could be affected by the court’s decision. In such situations, courts may need detailed evidentiary hearings, discovery, and coordinated legal argument to resolve competing claims. Broader litigation can address related issues such as trustee conduct, potential undue influence, or conflicting estate documents. Where stakes are high, a broader approach ensures that all legal avenues are explored and that evidence is fully developed to support a favorable and enforceable outcome.
When the question of asset inclusion intersects with creditor claims, tax considerations, or other estate administration actions, a broader legal strategy can protect rights across multiple fronts. Coordinating responses to creditor assertions, addressing potential tax consequences, and ensuring proper notices are made to interested parties may require a more comprehensive litigation posture. Courts may also need to consider whether treating property as part of the probate estate will affect other pending matters. A comprehensive approach helps ensure that all related issues are identified and addressed in a cohesive manner.
A comprehensive legal strategy in contested Heggstad matters provides assurance that all relevant facts and legal arguments are presented. This reduces the risk of later challenges and increases the likelihood of a durable court ruling that accounts for creditor interests, tax implications, and potential collateral disputes. Comprehensive preparation often includes gathering thorough documentary evidence, preparing witnesses, and mapping how a court order will affect the trust and probate estate. For parties facing multiple overlapping claims, such preparation can preserve long-term interests and reduce the chance of further litigation down the line.
Comprehensive representation also helps streamline compliance with procedural requirements and ensures that notices and filings satisfy California probate rules. Well-prepared petitions and supporting briefs anticipate common defenses and present legal authority supporting the requested relief. This can shorten hearing time and improve the clarity of the court’s order. When multiple parties are involved, a comprehensive approach improves communication and documentation, which in turn can lead to negotiated resolutions or clearer judicial findings that facilitate estate administration and distribution.
A measured, thorough approach builds a stronger evidentiary record to support a Heggstad petition, providing the court with clear proof of transfers, dates, and the transferor’s intent. Collecting contemporaneous documents, preparing affidavits, and organizing chain-of-title evidence helps the court assess whether property should be treated as part of the probate estate. A robust record minimizes ambiguity and reduces the risk that the court will defer decision-making or require additional discovery. This preparation ultimately increases the chance of a decisive ruling consistent with the petitioner’s objectives.
Comprehensive legal work coordinates the Heggstad petition with concurrent estate matters like creditor claims, estate accounting, or trust administration, so court actions do not conflict and administration proceeds efficiently. By addressing related issues together, parties can avoid piecemeal rulings that leave obligations unresolved. A coordinated approach also facilitates settlements or stipulated orders when appropriate, reducing cost and delay for beneficiaries and fiduciaries. The result is a clearer path to final distribution and a reduced likelihood of future disputes arising from unresolved questions about asset status.
Collecting comprehensive records is essential when preparing a Heggstad petition. Locate deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, trust instruments, and any communications that show when and how assets were moved. Detailed chronology and authenticated documents strengthen the factual presentation to the court. If records are missing, contemporaneous affidavits and witness statements can help fill gaps. Organizing evidence chronologically with clear labels helps the court and opposing parties quickly grasp the sequence of events and reduces confusion during hearings.
Early and proper notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and creditors helps avoid procedural defects and increases the chance of a smoother resolution. Identifying and notifying all potentially interested parties gives them an opportunity to respond and can encourage cooperative solutions. When disputes are anticipated, early communication may lead to stipulated facts or agreed-upon remedies, reducing contested court time and legal costs. Proper notice also satisfies statutory requirements and supports the validity of any judicial declaration.
Consider filing a Heggstad petition when the status of assets is unclear and that ambiguity affects probate administration, creditor claims, or distribution to beneficiaries. If assets appear to have been transferred to a trust but factual records suggest the transfer should not defeat a will provision or a creditor’s claim, judicial clarification may be necessary. The petition provides a formal mechanism to obtain a court ruling that guides estate administration. It is appropriate when informal resolution is not possible and when a clear judicial declaration will protect legal and financial interests.
Another important reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to prevent future litigation by obtaining a court order that documents how contested assets will be treated. A judicial determination can reduce uncertainty, protect beneficiaries from later claims, and help trustees administer assets correctly. Where title records, beneficiary designations, or other formalities are inconsistent with the decedent’s apparent intent, the petition helps reconcile those discrepancies. The clarity provided by a court order can also be valuable when distributing assets and closing probate proceedings efficiently.
Typical scenarios prompting a Heggstad petition include last-minute transfers to a trust, discrepancies between trust and will provisions, property that remains titled in a decedent’s name despite a trust plan, or accounts with beneficiary designations that conflict with trust documents. These circumstances generate uncertainty about whether property should be included in probate for distribution or creditor resolution. A petition brings the issue before the probate court so the judge can evaluate the facts and determine how the asset should be treated consistent with California law and the decedent’s overall estate plan.
When assets are retitled shortly before death, questions may arise about whether the transfer was intended to change distribution or whether probate treatment remains appropriate. A Heggstad petition can clarify whether the transfer should be respected or whether the asset should be treated as part of the probate estate. The court will review timing, documentation, and surrounding circumstances to assess intent. These reviews are particularly common when the transferor executed multiple estate planning documents in a short timeframe or when records are incomplete.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations on accounts and terms of trust or will documents can create a need for judicial clarification. If an account lists one beneficiary while trust documents or a will indicate another distribution plan, the discrepancy may impede administration. A Heggstad petition enables the court to reconcile these differences and determine whether the asset should be treated as part of the probate estate for distribution. Courts weigh the formality of the documents and the transferor’s intent in resolving these conflicts.
Assets that were intended to be placed into a trust but remain in the decedent’s individual name create uncertainty in administration. When funding is incomplete or appears inconsistent with the rest of the estate plan, a Heggstad petition may be used to request a judicial declaration about how those assets should be handled for probate purposes. The petition assists in ensuring the decedent’s plan is effectuated in a way that addresses both trust and probate considerations, and helps administrators take the next steps needed to resolve asset distribution.
If you are facing questions about assets transferred to a trust and need certainty for probate or distribution, local representation in Culver City can guide the process and ensure filings comply with Los Angeles County probate procedures. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in preparing petitions, assembling supporting documentation, and navigating court timelines. We aim to present clear, organized filings and to communicate with trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties to pursue an efficient path to judicial resolution that clarifies how contested assets should be treated in estate administration.
Selecting counsel who understands both trust administration and probate proceedings matters when petitioning the court for declarations about asset status. Our firm combines hands-on estate planning practice with courtroom familiarity in probate matters, allowing us to prepare pleadings that speak directly to the legal standards and evidentiary needs of California probate judges. We focus on building clear factual records and presenting persuasive legal reasoning that explains why the court should treat particular assets as part of the estate for administration or distribution purposes.
We place emphasis on careful document assembly, chronological presentation of transfers, and appropriate service and notice to interested parties. These procedural details can determine whether a petition advances efficiently or faces delays. By anticipating questions about intent, title, and supporting documentation, we help petitioners avoid common pitfalls in probate filings. Our approach strives to reduce contested litigation where possible and to secure decisive rulings when contested matters require judicial resolution, always keeping client goals and estate administration timelines in focus.
When preparing to file a Heggstad petition, potential petitioners benefit from a clear roadmap: identify the asset, gather authentic records, prepare witness statements or affidavits if needed, and provide the court with a straightforward legal argument grounded in relevant California authorities. We assist clients through each step, including interactions with trustees and other interested parties, to reduce misunderstanding and promote orderly administration. Our goal is to obtain a court decision that provides clarity and enables the estate process to proceed to final distribution efficiently.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the relevant documents and a focused investigation into the history of the asset transfer. We identify necessary evidence, prepare the petition and exhibits, ensure proper notice to interested parties, and file with the appropriate Los Angeles County probate court. We then handle follow-up matters such as responses to objections, requests for additional discovery, and preparation for hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, likely outcomes, and any options for negotiated resolution to reduce delays and costs.
The first step is a careful case assessment and collection of all documents bearing on title, transfers, and the decedent’s intent. This includes trust instruments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, wills, and correspondence. We create a timeline of events and identify any missing records that could be obtained through subpoena or cooperation from custodians of records. A comprehensive factual foundation helps the petition clarify the status of assets and demonstrates to the court why a judicial declaration is appropriate.
We work with clients to identify all potentially relevant records and witnesses who can attest to transfer events or the decedent’s intent. Witness statements, bank records, and title documents are organized into exhibits designed to tell a coherent story to the court. If necessary, we assist in obtaining certified copies of deeds or bank statements and in preparing affidavits from witnesses who recall material facts. The objective is to assemble a complete, well-organized record that supports the petition’s factual assertions.
After gathering facts, we evaluate which legal theories and remedies best fit the circumstances, whether a Heggstad petition is the right procedural vehicle, or whether related actions are advisable. We prepare a legal analysis that aligns the facts with applicable California probate law and precedents so the petition presents a persuasive and lawful request for relief. This analysis informs the drafting of the petition, choice of exhibit materials, and strategy for addressing predictable defenses or procedural issues.
Once the petition and supporting exhibits are prepared, we file the petition with the probate court and serve all required parties according to statutory notice rules. Proper service and timely filing are essential to avoid procedural delays or challenges. We draft clear, concise pleadings that frame the issue for the judge and include a proposed form of order when appropriate. The filing triggers the court’s review and sets the schedule for any responses, discovery, or hearings necessary to resolve the matter.
We prepare the petition, exhibits, and supporting declarations with attention to local court rules, required attachments, and formatting. The goal is to submit a complete package that allows the court to understand the request without unnecessary follow-up. Proper pleading conventions, clear statements of facts, and concise legal argument help expedite the court’s consideration. Filing also initiates the official case number and schedule that governs subsequent proceedings.
After filing, we ensure that all required notices are served and tracked, and we monitor responses from interested parties. If objections or requests for additional documentation are filed, we respond promptly and work to resolve factual disputes through stipulation or evidentiary exchange when possible. Where disagreements persist, we prepare the case for hearing, including witness preparation and exhibit indexing, to present a compelling and organized presentation to the probate judge.
The court may resolve a Heggstad petition on written submissions, but often a hearing is necessary to weigh evidence and legal argument. We prepare for hearings by organizing exhibits, preparing witness testimony, and drafting concise argument points that address likely judicial questions. Following the hearing, the judge issues an order that may declare the asset to be part of the probate estate for specified purposes or take other appropriate action. We then advise on steps to implement the court’s decision within the estate administration process.
At hearing, the court evaluates the documentary record, testimony, and legal argument. We present an organized case that traces the asset’s history, explains any inconsistencies, and shows why the requested declaration is appropriate under California law. Clear presentation of timelines, authenticated exhibits, and corroborating witness statements helps the judge reach a decision that aligns with the estate plan and statutory framework. We remain prepared to address evidentiary objections and to streamline testimony for efficient court consideration.
After the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the decision, which may include updating estate inventories, coordinating distribution steps, addressing creditor claims affected by the ruling, and communicating the outcome to trustees and beneficiaries. Proper follow-through ensures the court’s declaration is enforced in the administration or distribution of assets. If further proceedings are required, such as accounting or clarifying orders, we guide clients through those next steps to bring the estate matter to final resolution.
A Heggstad petition is a probate filing requesting that the court declare certain property, though transferred to a trust, be treated as part of the decedent’s probate estate for specific purposes such as distribution or creditor claims. The petition is typically used when transfers are ambiguous, when a pour-over will suggests a unified estate plan, or when title changes near the time of death raise questions about the transferor’s intent. The court examines the factual history and legal authorities to decide whether the asset should be included in the probate estate for limited purposes. In practical terms, the petition provides a procedure within probate court to resolve uncertainties without initiating broader civil litigation. It focuses narrowly on the status of specified assets, and the remedy is tailored to the needs of estate administration. The petitioner presents documentary evidence, witness statements, and legal argument to support the requested declaration, and the court issues an order that facilitates distribution or other probate actions consistent with the ruling.
A Heggstad petition differs from a general probate claim because it asks the probate court to recognize that particular property transferred to a trust should nonetheless be treated as part of the probate estate for certain purposes. A typical probate claim may address debts, creditor demands, or the validity of a will, whereas a Heggstad petition specifically targets the question of whether trust-transferred assets should be subject to probate administration or distribution under the decedent’s estate plan. The petition is focused and fact-driven, requiring documentation of transfers, timing, and intent. While creditor claims and will contests can be part of probate proceedings, the Heggstad petition’s purpose is to reconcile transfers with probate needs rather than to litigate the overall validity of estate documents. Courts use established legal standards to determine whether the petition’s requested treatment is appropriate under the circumstances.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad petition includes authenticated transfer documents such as deeds, account change forms, beneficiary designation records, trust instruments, and bank statements that establish the timing and nature of transfers. Contemporaneous records that show the transferor’s actions and intentions carry significant weight. Affidavits or declarations from individuals with direct knowledge, such as bank personnel or witnesses to signing, can help corroborate documentary evidence. Equally important is a clear timeline that links transfers to the decedent’s estate plan, such as a pour-over will or correspondence reflecting intent. The court evaluates the totality of the documentary and testimonial record, so organized, authenticated exhibits and coherent witness statements improve the petition’s likelihood of success. Gaps or inconsistencies in records may complicate the proceeding and require additional discovery or testimony.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can affect creditor claims because a court’s declaration that property be treated as part of the probate estate may make the asset subject to probate creditor procedures. If the asset is deemed part of the estate for the purpose of satisfying obligations, creditors who timely present claims may have rights against those assets. The petition can therefore influence the pool of property available to satisfy estate debts and the priorities of claimants under probate rules. Because creditor interests may be implicated, proper notice to potential creditors and compliance with statutory timelines are important. The probate court will consider the effect of its declaration on creditor rights, and interested parties may respond to protect their claims. Addressing creditor issues as part of the petition process helps ensure that the court’s order can be implemented without creating unresolved liabilities.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies with case complexity, court schedules, and whether objections are filed. A straightforward, uncontested petition supported by clear records can be resolved within a matter of months, while contested matters involving discovery, multiple parties, or complex evidentiary disputes can take longer. Local court calendars in Los Angeles County and the need for hearings or additional briefing also affect timing. Early document collection and proper notice help expedite the process. When petitions are contested, additional steps such as depositions, motions, and evidentiary hearings extend the timeline. Prompt cooperation among parties and focused preparation reduce delays. It is prudent to plan for variable timelines and to address procedural requirements promptly to avoid unnecessary setbacks in probate administration.
Interested parties with a legal stake in the treatment of assets can file a Heggstad petition, including beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, executors, or administrators who believe the court should declare particular property part of the probate estate for administration or distribution. The petitioner must have standing, meaning a legitimate interest that could be affected by the court’s declaration. Courts will require appropriate notice to other interested parties so they can respond. In some situations trustees may also bring related actions to clarify their duties, while beneficiaries or heirs may file petitions to protect distribution interests. Because procedural rules govern who may file and how notice is provided, petitioners should ensure they comply with California probate statutes to avoid defects that could delay or invalidate a petition.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically open a trust for general review; rather, it asks the probate court to treat specified property as part of the probate estate for limited purposes. The scope of the court’s order is typically tailored to the petition’s request, such as including an asset in estate accounting or distribution. Trustees retain their role with respect to trust administration unless a separate action seeks broader relief regarding trust management or validity. However, the court’s declaration may have practical effects on how assets are administered and distributed, and it may lead to coordination between probate and trust processes. If broader relief is sought regarding trustee conduct or trust terms, those matters generally require separate or additional proceedings under the appropriate legal framework.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the property will generally remain treated under the trust’s terms absent other court orders. A denial means the judge was not persuaded that the asset should be deemed part of the probate estate for the requested purposes. Petitioners may evaluate available options, such as seeking reconsideration if new evidence surfaces, pursuing alternative legal remedies in civil court, or negotiating with trustees or beneficiaries regarding equitable solutions. A denial may also prompt parties to reassess estate administration strategies and consider whether other claims, such as reformation or accounting actions, are appropriate. Because the consequences vary with the case, understanding the court’s reasoning and consulting on next steps helps ensure parties take appropriate follow-up actions.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include negotiation with trustees and beneficiaries to reach an agreed resolution, pursuing a declaratory relief action in civil court where broader remedies are needed, or pursuing related probate remedies such as accountings or petitions addressing trustee duties. In some cases parties may agree to stipulated orders that accomplish the practical result without contested proceedings. Choosing an alternative depends on the parties’ willingness to cooperate and the legal issues at stake. Mediation or settlement discussions can also resolve disputes without court determinations, saving time and expense. However, when parties cannot agree and clear legal declarations are necessary for proper administration, a Heggstad petition remains a direct probate avenue to obtain formal judicial guidance on asset status.
Before seeking a Heggstad petition, prepare a thorough set of documents that trace the asset’s history, including deeds, account and bank statements, trust instruments, beneficiary designations, pour-over wills, and any correspondence about transfers. Create a clear timeline of events and gather witness contact information for those who can attest to material facts. Certified copies of title documents and authenticated bank records strengthen the petition’s factual foundation. It is also helpful to organize records into exhibits with labels and to prepare concise summaries that explain how each document supports the requested relief. Early attention to proper service lists and potential interested parties ensures compliance with probate notice rules and reduces the chance of procedural setbacks once the petition is filed.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas