A Heggstad petition resolves situations where a trust owner intended for certain assets to be held in a trust but those assets were never properly retitled before their death. In Del Aire and broader Los Angeles County, California courts can be asked to transfer assets into a trust using this petition when documentary evidence shows the decedent intended ownership to pass to the trust. This page explains how the Heggstad process works, why people pursue it after a trustmaker’s death, and what documentation typically supports a successful filing in probate court for transfer of real or personal property into a trust.
Many families encounter Heggstad issues when a trust was prepared but assets remain recorded in the decedent’s name. The Heggstad petition can be an efficient remedy that avoids prolonged probate for certain assets by demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. On this page you will find practical information about common steps, evidence that courts consider persuasive, timelines typical in Los Angeles County, and how a careful petition can protect beneficiaries’ interests while preserving the terms of a trust. Understanding the approach helps clients make informed choices about next steps after a loved one’s passing.
A Heggstad petition is important because it can align legal title with a trustmaker’s documented estate plan without subjecting all assets to formal probate administration. For beneficiaries, filing a Heggstad petition can restore intended control of assets, ensure trust distributions proceed according to the trust document, and reduce delay and expense compared with open probate for every asset. This approach is particularly valuable when clear evidence shows the decedent intended to transfer ownership to the trust but paperwork or recordation was incomplete. Courts look for convincing indicators of intent and manifestation of trust ownership, and a well-prepared petition organizes that evidence efficiently.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across California, with practical experience handling Heggstad petitions and related probate matters in Los Angeles County. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful documentation, and respectful handling of family concerns during post-death administration. We assist clients in assembling proof of intent, preparing pleadings for the probate court, and coordinating with fiduciaries and beneficiaries to minimize disputes. This service is grounded in a strong knowledge of California probate rules and a commitment to preserving the trustmaker’s wishes while guiding clients through procedural requirements and timelines.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that particular assets should be treated as trust property despite not having been formally retitled prior to the trustmaker’s death. The petition relies on evidence such as the trust document, beneficiary designations, prior transfers, statements by the decedent, or other indicia of intent. Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate for assets that clearly belong to the trustmaker’s estate planning plan, streamlining distribution to the trust’s beneficiaries. Courts evaluate whether the trustmaker intended the trust to control the property and whether equitable relief is appropriate based on the facts presented.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition requires careful gathering of records and statements that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. Typical supporting materials include trust documents, copies of wills such as a pour-over will, bank or title records showing steps taken toward funding, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, and testimony from individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s intent. The court considers these materials alongside statutory and case law to determine whether title or ownership should be treated as having been transferred into the trust. Timely action and clear presentation reduce the risk of contested proceedings and delays.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court to have property declared part of a trust even though it was never formally retitled. It is used when the trustmaker created a trust but, at death, assets remained in their individual name or otherwise were not recorded in the trust’s name. The petition asks the court to effectuate the trustmaker’s intent by ordering title changes or directing distribution to the trust. Courts review evidence to determine whether the trustmaker intended the trust to hold the specified assets, balancing the need to honor estate planning documents with statutory probate procedures.
Successful Heggstad petitions generally include a clear statement of facts, copies of the trust document, evidence of actions the trustmaker took toward funding the trust, and any related documents such as pour-over wills or beneficiary designations. The process begins with assembling evidence, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and filing in the appropriate probate court. Notice is provided to interested parties and beneficiaries, and the court schedules a hearing. At that hearing, the judge evaluates whether the trustmaker intended the property to be held in trust and may issue an order to transfer title or otherwise direct distributions consistent with the trust.
Understanding common terms helps when navigating a Heggstad petition. Important concepts include the trust instrument itself, pour-over will provisions that direct assets to a trust, beneficiary designations on accounts, and the distinction between probate and nonprobate transfers. Other relevant items include documents that evidence intent, such as correspondence or trust funding checklists. Familiarity with these terms and how they apply in real cases prepares beneficiaries and fiduciaries to respond to a petition, to gather necessary evidence, and to anticipate the questions a court may ask when deciding whether to honor the trustmaker’s funding intent.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that requests the court recognize property as trust property despite formal title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition requires demonstration of the deceased person’s intent to fund a trust and is often used when trust documents exist but certain assets were overlooked or not retitled. It can provide a pathway for transferring title or directing distribution without a full probate administration for those specific assets. Evidence supporting the petition may include the trust document, witnesses who can attest to intent, and records suggesting an intention to transfer ownership to the trust.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets not already in the trust at death to be transferred into the trust through the probate process. It serves as a safety net to ensure the trust receives property the trustmaker forgot to retitle. When combined with a Heggstad petition, a pour-over will can support the argument that the trustmaker intended those assets to be governed by the trust. Courts consider the pour-over will as part of the overall estate plan when evaluating funding intent and appropriate remedies for unfunded trust assets.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime or through post-death remedies so the trust holds legal title to those assets. Proper funding frequently involves retitling real property, updating account ownership or pay-on-death designations, and recording deeds where necessary. When funding is incomplete at death, mechanisms like a Heggstad petition or probate administration may be used to align legal title with the trustmaker’s intent. Evidence of partial funding or steps taken toward funding can strengthen a Heggstad petition.
A beneficiary designation is a contract-driven instruction on accounts or policies that names who will receive the proceeds at death, often superseding a will. Retirement accounts, payable-on-death bank accounts, and life insurance policies commonly use beneficiary designations. When these designations align with the trust or trust beneficiaries, they can support a claim that the trustmaker intended certain assets to benefit the trust. Courts may consider the consistency of beneficiary designations with trust documents when evaluating a Heggstad petition and determining appropriate relief for unfunded trust assets.
When assets remain outside a trust at death, families typically consider a Heggstad petition or formal probate administration. A Heggstad petition can be a focused remedy addressing specific assets that the decedent intended for the trust, potentially avoiding the broader expense and publicity of full probate. Probate administration may still be necessary for estate assets without sufficient evidence of intent or where multiple creditors and claims must be resolved in court. The choice depends on the nature of the assets, the clarity of the trustmaker’s intent, and whether interested parties agree on the trust’s control over the property.
A limited Heggstad petition is often sufficient when there is clear documentary evidence that the decedent intended specific assets to be in the trust. Examples include a trust document referencing the asset, prior deeds or account changes reflecting steps toward funding, or consistent beneficiary designations. When such documentation exists, the court can often order transfer of title to the trust for those items without opening a broad probate estate. A focused petition reduces administrative complexity and concentrates litigation risk on the properties in question, enabling a faster alignment of title with the trust’s instructions.
A Heggstad petition is particularly appropriate when beneficiaries and interested parties are largely in agreement about the trustmaker’s intent and the disposition of the assets. If family members and potential heirs consent or do not object to transferring property into the trust, the court can grant relief more expeditiously. When conflict is unlikely or evidence strongly favors the trustmaker’s intent, a streamlined petition avoids the broader exposure, time, and administrative costs associated with full probate, and it can maintain privacy for trust distributions by keeping proceedings limited to the specific property at issue.
Comprehensive probate or trust administration may be necessary where estates are complex, multiple creditors assert claims, or beneficiaries dispute the trustmaker’s intent. In such situations, the court-supervised probate process provides an established framework for resolving claims, adjudicating disputes over assets, and ensuring proper notice to interested parties. When the facts surrounding asset ownership are contested or evidence is ambiguous, a broader legal process ensures all interested parties have an opportunity to be heard and the court can make determinations that settle title and distribution across the entire estate.
A full probate administration may be required when assets are numerous, intermingled with personal holdings, or when financial records are incomplete and a court-supervised accounting is necessary. Probate allows for formal appointment of a personal representative, an inventory of assets, and a structured process for addressing creditor claims and distributing assets. When trust funding issues are widespread across many accounts or property types, a comprehensive approach can clarify ownership, ensure legal compliance, and protect the rights of creditors and beneficiaries through court oversight and statutory procedures.
A comprehensive approach ensures all assets and liabilities are properly accounted for, reducing the risk of overlooked property or unresolved creditor claims. This method provides clarity to beneficiaries about the estate’s full value and can help prevent future disputes by documenting transfers and distributions under court supervision when necessary. Although broader administration may involve added time and formalities, it offers a definitive legal resolution that can be helpful in complex estates, those with contested elements, or where multiple jurisdictions and account types require coordinated action to settle an estate and implement the trustmaker’s overall intentions.
Comprehensive administration also creates a clear record of decisions and transactions, which can be invaluable in family situations that could otherwise lead to disagreement. It can provide finality by producing court orders that resolve contested ownership claims and by establishing a timeline for distribution. For families seeking a complete and defensible process, thorough administration combined with carefully drafted petitions and documentation minimizes the chance that latent issues will arise after distributions are made, thereby promoting stability among beneficiaries and fiduciaries during and after the settlement process.
One significant advantage of a comprehensive approach is the creation of a formal record that documents asset inventories, valuations, and distribution decisions. This accountability helps protect fiduciaries from later claims and provides beneficiaries with transparent evidence of how the estate was handled. In complex families or where large or unusual assets exist, a documented process helps preserve trust among parties, supports court rulings if disputes arise later, and ensures that transfer and titling issues are addressed methodically so distributions reflect the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Comprehensive administration provides a structured timeline for creditor claims and beneficiary challenges, which helps reduce the risk of surprise claims after distribution. By following established legal procedures and offering required notices, the process limits later attempts to undo transfers or challenge inheritances. This protection is particularly valuable when estates include contested assets, mixed ownership, or earlier planning steps that were incomplete. The court’s oversight and formal orders provide legal certainty that can give beneficiaries and fiduciaries peace of mind about the finality of distributions to the trust or estate.
Collecting comprehensive documentation is one of the most effective ways to support a Heggstad petition. Relevant items include the trust document and any amendments, deeds or account statements that show partial steps toward funding, beneficiary designations that align with the trust, and correspondence or declarations that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Statements from individuals who oversaw the trustmaker’s planning, when available, can also be helpful. Organizing these materials chronologically and clearly presenting them in the petition improves the court’s ability to evaluate the request and accelerates the resolution of title disputes.
When only a few assets are at issue, keeping a Heggstad petition narrowly tailored to those items can streamline the court’s review and reduce administrative burden. A focused petition that emphasizes the strongest evidence for each specific asset allows the judge to decide the matter efficiently and can reduce exposure to broader challenges. This approach is often preferable when documentation for some assets is clear while other items may require separate handling. Narrow petitions minimize friction, limit the scope of proceedings, and often produce quicker results for beneficiaries awaiting distribution under the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a trust exists but one or more assets were overlooked or not retitled in the trustmaker’s name prior to death. If the trust document clearly expresses an intent for those assets to be governed by the trust, and you have supporting records such as account statements, deeds, or beneficiary designations, the petition can provide an efficient remedy. Families often pursue this when they prefer to follow the trust’s terms rather than open a full probate for select assets. The petition can preserve the trustmaker’s plan and minimize delay and expense for the specific properties involved.
Another reason to consider this service is when privacy is important to the family. Heggstad petitions can address discrete assets without the broader public inventory and administration associated with full probate, preserving more confidentiality about distributions. Additionally, when heirs and beneficiaries generally agree on the trustmaker’s intent, the petition can achieve the desired result with less confrontation. It is also a useful option when time is a factor and a streamlined judicial order for specific assets can speed transfer into the trust compared with opening a full estate administration.
Common circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include recently created trusts with incomplete funding, oversight when deeds or titles were not updated, changes in account ownership that were started but not completed, and situations where a trustmaker relied on estate planning professionals but assets remained in personal name. Families also use Heggstad petitions when a trustmaker’s intention is documented but the administrative steps were interrupted by illness or death. These real-world scenarios often result in a concentrated need to align legal title with the trustmaker’s estate plan to permit smooth distribution under the trust.
Real property often triggers a Heggstad petition when the deed was never changed into the trust’s name despite the trustmaker’s clear intent. In such cases, presenting the trust document, evidence of drafting or funding efforts, and correspondence showing the decedent intended the property to be held by the trust helps the court determine that title should be recognized as trust property. The petition seeks a judicial order so that the trustee may manage or distribute the property according to the trust’s terms without a lengthy probate process for that asset.
Accounts that were intended to be transferred into a trust but remain in the decedent’s personal name are common candidates for a Heggstad petition. Exhibits such as statements showing prior attempts to retitle, beneficiary designations that point to trust beneficiaries, or contemporaneous notes can show the trustmaker’s intent. The probate court can then be asked to order transfer of the account proceeds to the trust or otherwise direct their disposition consistent with the trust document, avoiding a full estate administration when the evidence is persuasive and interested parties are notified and given an opportunity to respond.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies can create complications when beneficiary designations are inconsistent with a trust or were left unchanged. A Heggstad petition may be part of a broader strategy to align these instruments with the trustmaker’s intent, particularly when other evidence supports that intent. Courts will examine whether contractual beneficiary designations control or whether equitable considerations and trust documents justify transfer into the trust. Resolving these issues through careful documentation and petition can help ensure the overall estate plan is implemented as the trustmaker intended.
If you face an unfunded trust or uncertain title in Del Aire or elsewhere in Los Angeles County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and preparing the necessary filings. We help clients collect supporting documents, draft petitions and declarations, coordinate notice to interested parties, and represent clients at hearings if needed. Our focus is on preserving the decedent’s planning goals while providing clear guidance during a sometimes stressful post-death process. Call to discuss specifics and learn about timelines and likely outcomes for your situation.
Choosing legal representation for a Heggstad petition matters because careful preparation of the petition and supporting evidence improves the chances of a favorable court decision. The firm emphasizes clear and thorough documentation gathering, appropriate legal pleadings, and careful attention to court rules and notice requirements. We work to present a concise, persuasive case to the probate court that aligns with the trustmaker’s documented intentions. Timely and methodical preparation helps reduce delays and helps safeguard family relationships through respectful and transparent communication.
Our approach includes assessing whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy better fits the circumstances, explaining the strengths and limitations of each option to clients, and tailoring the strategy to the family’s priorities. We prepare the necessary paperwork for filing in Los Angeles County courts, assist with gathering declarations and documentary evidence, and coordinate service and notice to ensure compliance with court procedures. Our goal is to guide clients toward a resolution that honors the trustmaker’s plan while minimizing cost and uncertainty wherever feasible.
We also prioritize clear communication with beneficiaries and fiduciaries to reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings. By presenting a well-organized petition and working with interested parties, we seek to resolve title issues in a way that preserves the trust’s purpose. When hearings are necessary, we advocate for pragmatic outcomes while ensuring the court has the information needed to decide on transfers or orders. Clients receive honest assessments about timelines, probable steps, and what documentation will be most persuasive in court.
Our handling of Heggstad petitions begins with an initial review of the trust documents and relevant asset records to determine whether the petitioner has a strong basis for filing. We help clients assemble declarations, collect supporting documents, and draft a petition tailored to the assets at issue. After filing, we coordinate required notices and, when possible, seek agreements among beneficiaries to expedite the process. If a hearing is scheduled, we prepare witness declarations and legal arguments to present a clear picture of the trustmaker’s intent and the requested relief from the probate court.
The first step focuses on assessing the strength of the case and collecting evidence that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. This includes reviewing the trust document, any related wills such as a pour-over will, account or deed records, beneficiary designations, and correspondence indicating intent. We identify the strongest pieces of evidence for each asset and prepare declarations from individuals with knowledge of the trustmaker’s planning. A careful inventory at this stage reduces the likelihood of missing key documents and helps shape a targeted petition for the court.
Gathering trust documents and property records involves collecting deeds, account statements, policy documents, and any amendments to the trust. We verify dates, signatures, and any references to particular assets in the trust language. This documentary foundation forms the backbone of a Heggstad petition and helps the court see whether the trustmaker took steps to fund the trust. In cases where records are incomplete, we work to find corroborating evidence such as prior transfers, checks or payment records, and communications that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent to include specific assets in the trust.
Statements and declarations from people who were involved in the trustmaker’s planning provide valuable context for the court. These can include caregivers, financial advisors, or family members who observed the trustmaker taking steps to transfer assets or who were told about the trustmaker’s intentions. Declarations should be precise, factual, and focused on actions and communications that indicate intent to fund the trust. Well-prepared declarations help the judge understand contemporaneous steps and support the argument that title should be treated as belonging to the trust.
Once evidence is assembled, the next step is drafting a petition that presents the facts clearly and persuasively, attaching supporting documents and declarations. The petition is filed in the appropriate Los Angeles County probate court and requires service on interested parties as dictated by court rules. Proper filing includes completing statutory forms, preparing proposed orders for the judge, and ensuring that notice is provided to beneficiaries, heirs, and other entities with potential interests. Careful attention to procedural detail reduces the risk of delays or technical objections to the filing.
Preparing the legal pleadings involves drafting the Heggstad petition, attaching a clear chronology of events and supporting exhibits, and crafting proposed orders for the court to sign. The proposed orders are written to effectuate title changes or direct distribution into the trust when the court finds the evidence persuasive. Clear, well-organized pleadings make it easier for the judge to follow the facts and reach a decision, and they also help other parties understand the requested relief and the basis for it, which can reduce misunderstandings and foster resolution without contested litigation.
Providing proper notice and service to beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors is a required part of the Heggstad process. We make sure notices comply with local court rules, statutory requirements, and any jurisdictional nuances in Los Angeles County probate practice. Timely and accurate notice allows interested parties to object or to agree with the petition, and it prevents procedural grounds for delaying or setting aside a court’s order. Documentation of service and proof of notice are included with filings to demonstrate compliance with legal obligations.
After filing and notice, the court schedules a hearing where the judge considers the petition, evidence, and any objections. At the hearing, the court evaluates whether the trustmaker intended for the assets to be held in trust and whether equitable relief is appropriate. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order that may direct a title company or county recorder to transfer ownership or instruct how funds should pass into the trust. We prepare clients and witnesses for the hearing and present the factual record so the court can resolve the matter efficiently.
Presenting evidence at the hearing requires organizing documentary exhibits and witness declarations to tell a coherent factual story about the trustmaker’s intent. Witnesses provide sworn testimony through declarations and, if necessary, live testimony at the hearing. The court assesses whether the evidence shows a clear intent to fund the trust and whether transferring the property into the trust is an equitable remedy. Effective presentation reduces the chance of confusion and supports a timely court ruling that aligns legal title with the trustmaker’s plan.
Following a favorable court decision, the probate court issues orders that specify how title or proceeds should be transferred into the trust. Those orders often direct the recorder to accept deeds, instruct financial institutions to reissue accounts in the trustee’s name, or guide distribution consistent with the trust terms. We assist clients in implementing the court’s directives, coordinating with title companies and banks, and completing the paperwork necessary to finalize transfers. Post-hearing steps are essential to ensure that the court’s relief has the practical effect of placing assets within the trust.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that certain property should be treated as trust property even though it was not retitled before the trustmaker’s death. The petition asks the probate court to effectuate the trustmaker’s intent by ordering title changes or directing distribution to the trust. Courts review the trust document and surrounding evidence to determine whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be governed by the trust rather than passing through general probate. The remedy is particularly useful for discrete assets that were overlooked during trust funding. It provides a pathway to implement the trustmaker’s plan for those specific items without opening a full estate administration for every asset, provided sufficient evidence supports the petition and interested parties receive proper notice.
Timelines for Heggstad petitions vary depending on the complexity of the evidence, the number of interested parties, and the court’s schedule. In some straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, the petition may be resolved within a few months, while contested matters or those requiring extensive evidence gathering can take longer. Local probate court calendars in Los Angeles County influence scheduling for hearings and rulings. Early organization of documents and proactive communication with beneficiaries can shorten delays. Ensuring proper notice and compliance with procedural requirements reduces the risk of continuances or objections that extend the process, allowing the court to reach a decision more efficiently.
Courts consider a range of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the trust document itself, deeds or account records showing attempts to transfer assets, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that reveals the trustmaker’s intent. Declarations from people familiar with the trustmaker’s planning and contemporaneous actions that indicate intent to fund the trust are also persuasive. The court assesses whether these materials collectively demonstrate the decedent’s intent to have the trust control the property. While different pieces of evidence vary in weight, a clear, consistent pattern of documentation and factual testimony strengthens the petition. The absence of conflicting claims and the presence of contemporaneous records typically make it easier for the court to grant the requested relief.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for specific assets that the court finds should be treated as trust property, but it does not automatically avoid probate for the entire estate. It is a targeted remedy for items that were intended to be in the trust but were not properly retitled. When evidence is strong for particular assets, the court may order transfer of those assets to the trust, leaving other assets to any necessary probate administration. For estates with widespread funding issues or multiple contested claims, a broader probate process may still be necessary. The Heggstad petition is most effective when used selectively for clearly identifiable assets with persuasive supporting evidence.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must provide notice to interested parties as required by probate rules. This typically includes named beneficiaries, trustees, heirs, and anyone else who may have a legal interest in the property. The court’s local rules and statutory procedures determine who must be served and how notice must be carried out to ensure parties have an opportunity to respond. Proper notice is important both for procedural compliance and for reducing the risk of objections later. Providing clear documentation with the petition and documenting service helps protect the court’s order from procedural challenges and supports a smoother resolution.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may require additional evidence, testimony, or briefing before deciding. Objections can raise factual disputes about the trustmaker’s intent, competing claims to property, or procedural defects in notice. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and may schedule hearings to resolve contested issues and determine whether the requested relief is appropriate. In contested cases, parties may negotiate settlements or the court may rule following a contested hearing. Preparing for potential objections by building a robust documentary record and securing persuasive declarations in advance helps address likely challenges and supports an orderly resolution.
Pour-over wills are relevant because they express the trustmaker’s intent to direct any probate assets into the trust. When combined with other documentation, a pour-over will can support the argument that certain assets were intended to be governed by the trust. The court considers the pour-over will as part of the entire estate plan when assessing whether the trustmaker wanted the trust to control assets at death. While a pour-over will alone may not be sufficient in every case, it strengthens the overall record of intent and, together with other contemporaneous evidence, can be persuasive in obtaining an order transferring assets into the trust.
A Heggstad petition does not eliminate creditors’ rights; creditors retain the ability to assert claims according to probate procedures and applicable statutes. If assets are subject to claims, the court will consider how to address outstanding debts while respecting the trustmaker’s documented intent. Proper notice to creditors and adherence to statutory claim periods are important to protect both the estate and beneficiaries from future disputes. When creditor issues are present, a broader administration may be necessary to ensure proper resolution. The petition process must be coordinated with creditor procedures to provide a defensible path for transferring assets into the trust while addressing obligations owed by the estate.
Courts do not always require live testimony to grant a Heggstad petition. Many petitions succeed based on well-prepared written declarations, documentary evidence, and affidavits. Probate courts routinely accept sworn written statements that establish the necessary facts, which can avoid the need for witnesses to appear in person. However, if material disputes exist or the court requests further proof, live testimony may be required to resolve conflicting accounts. Preparing clear, credible written declarations and exhibits can reduce the likelihood that live testimony will be necessary and can expedite the court’s resolution of the matter.
Families can prepare for a Heggstad petition by gathering all relevant estate planning documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that indicates the trustmaker’s intent. Identifying potential witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s actions or statements and collecting their statements early helps create a strong factual record. Ensuring that beneficiary contact information is available also streamlines the notice process and reduces delays. Additionally, organizing documents chronologically and noting any partial steps taken to fund the trust helps counsel assess the likelihood of success and draft an effective petition. Early preparation often shortens the time to resolution and improves the court’s ability to grant the requested relief.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas