A trust modification petition allows a settlor or interested party to request changes to an existing trust when circumstances change or when an error must be corrected. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we help clients in East Rancho Dominguez and throughout Los Angeles County evaluate whether a petition is the right path. Whether the change involves trustee powers, beneficiary designations, or clarifying ambiguous language, a modification petition can provide a court-approved solution that updates the trust while preserving the settlor’s intent and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Deciding to pursue a trust modification petition often follows life events like remarriage, births, deaths, changes in assets, or newly discovered drafting problems. Our approach balances careful legal analysis with attentive client communication so you understand the possible outcomes, timeline, and potential impacts on estate administration. We will outline alternatives such as nonjudicial settlement agreements when appropriate and explain when court intervention may be necessary to secure a clear, enforceable modification that aligns with current needs and legal requirements under California law.
A trust modification petition can preserve the intent of the trustmaker while addressing unforeseen changes and ambiguities that could lead to disputes among beneficiaries. It offers a formal avenue to update terms, adjust distributions, or correct drafting errors with judicial oversight that reduces future challenges. By obtaining a court order, parties gain clarity and enforceability, which can prevent protracted disagreements and reduce the likelihood of costly litigation. For many families, a modification petition restores alignment between current circumstances and the trust document, improving estate administration and providing peace of mind for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across California with a focus on practical, client-centered estate planning and trust administration solutions. Our team assists with a full range of trust-related matters including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, trust modification petitions, and related petitions such as Heggstad and trust modification filings. We emphasize careful preparation of documents and clear communication through every step of a court process so clients understand options, timelines, and likely outcomes. Our office works to protect family relationships and financial interests while navigating probate court when required.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court asking that the terms of a trust be changed or reformed for reasons such as mistake, changed circumstances, or impossibility of performance. The petition typically outlines the requested changes, explains why modification is necessary, and identifies interested parties who must be notified. California law requires specific grounds and procedural steps, including notice and the opportunity for beneficiaries to object. The court evaluates whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent and whether the alteration is legally appropriate under the governing statutes and case law.
Some modifications can be accomplished outside of court through agreements among beneficiaries when statutes allow, but where consensus is not possible or where the trust document is ambiguous, a petition seeks a judicial resolution. The petition process may involve gathering trust documents, financial records, and declarations that explain the factual basis for the change. The court may grant the petition in whole or in part or may order alternative relief. Understanding the legal standards and evidentiary requirements helps interested parties assess the likelihood of success and prepare effectively for hearings or settlement discussions.
A trust modification petition requests judicial authority to alter a trust’s terms when the original provisions are inconsistent with the settlor’s current intent or when unforeseen conditions make compliance impractical. Reasons include clerical errors, ambiguous language, changed family dynamics, or the discovery of facts not known at the time of drafting. The petition sets out the legal theory for modification, which may rely on statutes permitting reformation for mistake or judicial modification under the trust code. The petition must present sufficient evidence to show that the proposed change reflects the true intent of the settlor or corrects a significant problem.
A successful petition typically includes a clear statement of the requested changes, supporting declarations or affidavits, copies of the trust and related documents, and proof of notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties. The court evaluates admissible evidence, considers filings or objections from interested persons, and may schedule a hearing. Legal representation helps ensure procedural requirements and timelines are met, that notice is properly served, and that evidence is presented in a compelling manner. The court’s decision may resolve ambiguities, correct mistakes, or approve equitable adjustments consistent with statutory standards.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. Terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, petition, notice, hearing, and conservatorship implications when relevant. Each term has procedural and practical implications, such as who must be notified, how evidence is introduced, and how modifications affect asset distribution. Clear definitions reduce confusion during settlement discussions or court proceedings and support collaborative resolutions when possible. This glossary provides plain-language explanations so clients and family members can communicate effectively through the legal process.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and chose its initial terms, beneficiaries, and trustee. In modification matters the settlors intent, as reflected in the trust document and supporting evidence, is central to the court’s decision. If the settlor is alive and has capacity, certain types of modifications may be made directly without court involvement through amendments. When the settlor is deceased or capacity is disputed, petitions and court filings rely on extrinsic evidence, declarations, and relevant documents to establish intent and justify requested changes.
Reformation is a legal remedy that allows the court to modify the terms of a written instrument, such as a trust, to reflect what the parties actually intended when a mistake or ambiguity is shown. Reformation requires proof that a drafting error or mutual mistake resulted in language that diverges from the settlor’s true intent. In trust contexts the remedy can correct wording that would otherwise frustrate the settlor’s objectives, provided that the court finds persuasive evidence supporting the requested reformation and determines that the change aligns with legal standards.
Notice is the required communication to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties informing them of a pending petition and their right to respond or object. Proper notice is essential to due process and the validity of any court order. Notice procedures may include personal service, mail, or published notice depending on the circumstances and the identities of interested persons. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to delays, challenges to court orders, or the need to re-serve parties, so attention to procedural detail ensures the process moves forward correctly.
A hearing is a court proceeding where parties present evidence and argument regarding the merits of a trust modification petition. The hearing allows the judge to ask questions, evaluate witness declarations, and consider objections from interested persons. Preparation includes filing legal briefs, witness declarations, and documentary evidence that support the requested change. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or propose modifications and conditions. Outcomes are entered as orders that amend, reform, or clarify trust terms as authorized by the court.
When trust terms need to change, parties may consider a nonjudicial agreement among beneficiaries, a direct amendment by the settlor if alive, or a court petition when consensus cannot be reached. Nonjudicial solutions can be faster and less costly when all interested parties agree and the trust document allows such actions. In contrast, a court petition provides formal authority and clarity when disputes exist or when legal grounds require judicial oversight. We help clients weigh the relative costs, timelines, privacy considerations, and risks of each path to recommend a strategy that best protects family relationships and asset distribution goals.
A limited, nonjudicial approach can be effective when all beneficiaries and the trustee are in agreement and the trust instrument permits modifications through written consent. This path avoids court costs and preserves confidentiality, making it suitable for straightforward changes such as correcting typographical errors or clarifying minor distribution instructions. Parties should carefully document their agreement to reduce the risk of later disputes, and should seek legal review to ensure the amendment or settlement complies with the trust terms and state law to prevent unintended consequences down the line.
When the settlor is alive and retains capacity, they may be able to amend a revocable trust directly, which can be the simplest and most direct solution. Direct amendment allows the settlor to revise terms without court involvement, preserving privacy and reducing expense. Even when the settlor can amend, legal guidance helps ensure changes are drafted clearly and integrate properly with related documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. Properly executed amendments minimize ambiguities that could otherwise lead to future disputes.
When family dynamics are strained or trust provisions affect substantial assets, a comprehensive legal approach helps identify potential contest grounds and craft persuasive evidence for the court. Complex factual histories, competing beneficiary claims, or interrelated estate planning instruments may require careful analysis and coordinated filings to protect interests and achieve an equitable result. Legal counsel can help manage discovery, prepare declarations, and negotiate settlements while ensuring that procedural protections such as proper notice and documentation are strictly followed to reduce the risk of later challenges.
Ambiguous language or drafting mistakes that alter distributions or administrative powers often call for a focused judicial resolution to ensure the trust reflects the settlor’s intent. A thorough approach gathers supporting evidence such as draft documents, correspondence, and witness declarations to demonstrate what the settlor intended. This preparation is important for persuading the court to reform the trust or grant the requested modification rather than leaving unclear provisions that invite future disputes. Court orders can then provide definitive, enforceable direction for trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
Pursuing a court-approved modification can yield greater certainty and enforceability than informal changes, especially when interests conflict or legal standards require judicial review. A court order clarifies trustee powers, beneficiary rights, and distribution instructions, reducing the likelihood of subsequent litigation. The structured process also creates a formal record that can aid trustees in administering assets with confidence. For families with significant assets or complex estate documents, judicial resolution helps avoid piecemeal disputes that could deplete the estate and damage relationships over time.
A comprehensive process also protects vulnerable parties by ensuring notice and opportunities to object are provided, which can prevent later allegations that a change was improper. Courts apply legal standards to balance fairness and intent, which can be especially valuable when evidence must be weighed or when competing interpretations arise. Ultimately, the formal route reduces ambiguity for estate administration, supports compliance with statutory requirements, and helps trustees act within the scope of their authority under a clarified trust document.
Court-reviewed modifications create an authoritative record that decreases the chances of future contests and disputes among beneficiaries. By addressing the legal and factual issues before a judge, parties can secure binding relief that clarifies distributions and trustee responsibilities. This certainty supports smoother trust administration and can save time and expense that would otherwise be spent defending informal agreements. For trustees, an order reduces personal liability risks by providing court-approved guidance for carrying out administrative duties in accordance with the revised terms.
A court process ensures that all interested parties receive notice and an opportunity to be heard, protecting the rights of minors, incapacitated beneficiaries, or parties with contested claims. This procedural fairness helps ensure modifications reflect appropriate legal standards and equitable outcomes. The resulting order can include conditions, oversight, or other measures to protect the trust’s purpose and the beneficiaries’ interests. When fairness and transparency are important, judicial review provides a structured framework that helps preserve relationships and reduce future uncertainty.
Collect all versions of the trust, related wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Documentation such as draft trust versions, handwritten notes, or emails can be valuable evidence if a petition seeks reformation for mistake or to clarify ambiguous language. Maintaining organized records of asset ownership and account statements also helps demonstrate how distributions should be handled following a modification. Early evidence preservation reduces the risk of disputes about authenticity or the facts relied upon during court proceedings.
Although court resolution provides certainty, many matters are resolved through negotiated settlement that preserves privacy and reduces costs. Explore mediation and settlement discussions early in the process if parties are willing to engage in constructive conversations. Preparing realistic proposals and understanding each party’s priorities can facilitate compromise. When settlement is reached, documenting the agreement carefully and obtaining court approval when required ensures enforceability and reduces the risk of later disputes interrupting trust administration.
There are several scenarios where a trust modification petition becomes a practical option, including when the trust contains drafting errors, when beneficiaries no longer reflect the settlor’s relationships or circumstances, or when administration issues arise due to outdated provisions. Petitions are also used to adjust trustee powers, correct clerical mistakes, or address tax planning changes that affect distribution timing. A petition can offer clarity and judicial approval that reduces disputes and aligns the trust instrument with current realities for the settlor and beneficiaries.
Other common grounds include the discovery of assets not accounted for in the original trust, the need to transfer retirement account benefits through a retirement plan trust, or to revise irrevocable trust terms under limited statutory authority. Life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths often trigger a reevaluation of trust provisions. Engaging in a careful review of the trust and related estate planning documents helps determine whether a nonjudicial amendment, a formal reformation, or a court petition best achieves the desired outcome.
Common circumstances prompting petitions include ambiguous distribution instructions, errors in beneficiary identification, changes in asset composition, or issues where the original trust fails to address modern financial instruments. Disputes often arise when multiple beneficiaries interpret language differently or when trustee authority conflicts with administration needs. Other situations such as guardianship nominations becoming outdated or special needs planning needing adjustment can require a court-reviewed modification to ensure the trust continues to serve its intended protective and planning roles.
Ambiguities in trust provisions can create disagreement among beneficiaries and uncertainty for trustees, making efficient administration difficult. When language is unclear about distribution timing, conditions, or beneficiary definitions, a petition can request reformation or clarification so that the trust’s terms are enforceable and reflect the settlor’s presumed intent. Gathering contemporaneous drafts, communications, and other evidence helps the court interpret intent and decide whether reformation or a different remedy is warranted to resolve ambiguities without undermining the trust’s purpose.
Life events such as births, deaths, relationship changes, or the needs of a beneficiary with disabilities can make the original trust terms no longer appropriate. When these changes create conflicts or require updated provisions for guardianship nominations, special needs planning, or pet trusts, a modification petition may be necessary. The court can approve revisions that address evolving family needs while safeguarding the trust’s intent and ensuring beneficiaries receive proper notice and the opportunity to respond to proposed changes.
Drafting errors, omitted provisions, or inconsistencies between the trust and related estate planning documents can interfere with proper administration. When clerical mistakes or omissions materially alter expected distributions or trustee powers, a petition to reform the document can correct the record so that the trust functions as intended. Courts will examine evidence of the settlor’s intent and the nature of the error before granting relief, and having a clear factual record improves the chance of a favorable judicial resolution.
If you are in East Rancho Dominguez or elsewhere in Los Angeles County and need assistance with a trust modification petition, our office can guide you through procedural requirements and potential outcomes. We help identify interested parties, prepare and file petitions, coordinate proper notice, and advocate for resolutions that reflect the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiary interests. From initial document review to court hearings or negotiated settlements, our role is to provide clear direction so clients understand options and can make informed decisions during what can be a sensitive family process.
Clients choose our firm for careful handling of trust matters and a focus on practical, efficient solutions. We prioritize transparent communication, thorough preparation of petitions and supporting evidence, and attention to procedural details such as notice and service. Our approach is to evaluate whether nonjudicial alternatives are viable and to pursue court-based relief when necessary to secure a clear, enforceable order. Throughout each case we work to minimize unnecessary cost and delay while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
We assist with a broad range of estate planning documents including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and specialized trust forms like irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, and special needs trusts. This breadth of experience enables us to anticipate related document conflicts and to craft petitions that coordinate with existing estate plans. Clients benefit from integrated support that aligns trust modifications with overall end-of-life and asset transfer goals.
Our office offers practical guidance on timelines, likely court procedures, and strategies for minimizing disputes. We help clients prepare declarations, gather documentary proof, and engage in negotiations or mediations when settlement is possible. If a hearing is required, we ensure filings meet local court rules and that interested parties are properly notified. Our goal is to achieve durable resolutions that preserve family relationships and ensure the trust operates as intended for the benefit of beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust and related estate planning documents to identify the issues and possible remedies. We then advise whether direct amendment, nonjudicial settlement, or a court petition is appropriate. If a petition is necessary we prepare the required pleadings, collect supporting declarations and exhibits, and ensure proper notice to interested parties. We maintain ongoing client communication about timing, expected costs, and settlement opportunities, and represent clients at hearings or negotiations to reach a resolution that aligns with the trustmaker’s intent and legal standards.
The first step involves reviewing the trust document, related estate planning instruments, asset inventories, and any communications or drafts that shed light on the settlor’s intent. This analysis identifies if a clerical error, ambiguity, or changed circumstance supports a petition. We assess potential interested parties, evaluate chances of settlement, and outline possible legal strategies and timelines. Initial counsel focuses on preserving evidence, securing critical documents, and advising on immediate actions to protect assets and the trust’s integrity while a decision about formal proceedings is made.
Gathering all relevant documents is essential to build a persuasive petition. This includes all versions of the trust, associated wills, powers of attorney, account statements, and any draft notes or communications that reveal the settlor’s intent. We review these materials to identify inconsistencies, errors, or evidence of intent that supports reformation or modification. Detailed analysis helps determine whether nonjudicial remedies are possible or whether judicial intervention is necessary to achieve the desired correction or clarification.
Identifying interested persons who must receive notice is a key procedural step because failure to notify can jeopardize a court order. We compile a list of beneficiaries, trustees, heirs, and other interested parties, confirm contact information, and plan notice methods in compliance with California procedures. Advising clients on proper notice and service reduces the risk of procedural challenges and establishes a foundation for a valid court proceeding should the petition move forward.
Once the petition and supporting materials are prepared, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and serve notice on all interested persons. The filing will set forth requested modifications, factual support, and legal bases for relief. Proper service gives beneficiaries an opportunity to respond, object, or enter settlement discussions. Timely and accurate filings and service are critical to preserve the court’s jurisdiction and to keep the process moving efficiently toward a hearing or negotiated resolution.
Supporting declarations and documentary exhibits are often decisive in showing why a modification is warranted. Declarations from witnesses, copies of drafts, or financial records can illuminate the settlor’s intent and substantiate claims of mistake or changed circumstances. We prepare and review these materials to ensure they comply with court requirements and persuasively tell the relevant factual story. Clear, well-documented exhibits increase the petition’s effectiveness and help the court reach a reasoned conclusion.
After filing, the court requires that interested parties be given the opportunity to respond. We manage the service process and monitor any objections or responses that are filed. If parties object, we evaluate options such as additional discovery, negotiations, or motions to resolve disputes. Handling objections promptly and strategically is important to avoid unnecessary delays and added costs, and to position the case for either settlement or a productive hearing.
If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present declarations, exhibits, and legal argument to the judge, addressing objections and emphasizing evidence that supports the requested modification. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or propose alternative relief and conditions. After the hearing the judge issues an order that may reform or modify the trust, clarify trustee powers, or set other terms for administration. We assist in implementing the order and updating trust records so trustees can carry out their duties under the revised provisions.
Presenting at a hearing involves clear, well-organized filings and oral argument that explain the factual basis for the requested change and the legal authority supporting it. We prepare witnesses and declarations to reinforce the petition and address the court’s likely questions. Effective presentation clarifies the settlor’s intent, demonstrates the necessity of the modification, and shows that the proposed changes serve the trust’s purpose while respecting beneficiaries’ rights.
Following a court order, we help implement the required changes by preparing amended trust documents, updating account registrations, and communicating the order’s terms to trustees, banks, and other institutions. If court approval is required for transfers or distributions, we assist with compliance steps to facilitate efficient administration. Proper implementation protects trustees from liability and ensures the revised trust functions as intended for the benefit of named beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with probate court seeking to change, reform, or clarify the terms of an existing trust. Reasons for filing include clerical errors, ambiguous language, or changed circumstances that make the original provisions inconsistent with the settlor’s intent or impractical to administer. The petition explains the proposed changes and provides supporting evidence such as draft documents, declarations, and financial records. The court evaluates the materials and may hold a hearing to determine whether the requested relief is appropriate under California law. A petition is typically needed when a direct amendment by the settlor is not possible or when beneficiaries disagree and judicial resolution is required. Filing initiates notice to interested persons and gives parties the opportunity to respond or object. The court may grant, deny, or modify the request and issue an order that clarifies or changes trust provisions. The outcome depends on the quality of evidence and the legal standards applicable to reformation or modification in the specific case.
Yes, a trust can sometimes be changed without court involvement if the settlor is alive and has capacity to amend the trust directly, or if the trust document or statute allows nonjudicial settlement agreements among beneficiaries. Direct amendments preserve privacy and avoid court fees. Nonjudicial agreements work when all interested parties agree and the changes do not violate mandatory legal provisions. Proper documentation and legal review are important to prevent future disputes and to ensure changes integrate with other estate planning documents. When disagreements arise, the trust contains ambiguous terms, or there is a need to correct mistakes that cannot be resolved by mutual consent, a court petition may be necessary. The judicial route provides authoritative resolution and an enforceable order that clarifies trustee powers and beneficiary rights, which can be essential for complex or contested matters.
California procedure requires notice to interested persons including beneficiaries, trustees, and heirs who may have an interest in the trust. Notice ensures due process and gives these parties an opportunity to file objections or participate in settlement discussions. The specific method of notice depends on who the interested persons are and may involve personal service, mail, or, in limited circumstances, substituted service. Proper identification and service of notice are essential to the court’s authority to act on a petition. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to delays, motions to set aside orders, or the need for additional service steps. When preparing a petition we compile a thorough list of potentially interested parties, confirm contact information, and follow statutory requirements for notification. This attention to procedural detail protects the validity of any resulting court order and reduces the risk of future challenges.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether objections are filed. Simple petitions with unanimous agreement can move more quickly, potentially resolving in a few months, while contested matters involving discovery, hearings, and multiple filings may take significantly longer. Local court schedules and the need for additional briefing or evidence can also extend the timeline. Early case assessment and organized preparation help streamline proceedings and clarify expected milestones. If parties are willing to negotiate or mediate, settlements can shorten the process and reduce costs. When a hearing is required, the court sets dates for briefing and oral argument, and the judge will issue an order after considering the evidence. Working proactively on notice, evidence collection, and possible settlement strategies can help manage timeframes and reduce uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries.
Evidence to support a petition for reformation often includes contemporaneous drafts of the trust, correspondence showing the settlor’s intent, declarations from witnesses or attorneys involved in drafting, and financial records that explain administrative expectations. Demonstrating that a mistake occurred or that the written terms do not reflect the settlor’s intent requires clear, admissible documentation. Witness statements and objective records that corroborate the claimed intent are especially persuasive to the court. In addition to drafting history, evidence may include emails, handwritten notes, meeting summaries, or other materials that establish what the settlor intended. Financial statements and asset inventories can show how the trust was meant to operate. Properly prepared declarations and authenticated documents increase the petition’s credibility and help the court assess whether reformation or another remedy is appropriate under California law.
A court will not automatically grant any requested modification; it evaluates whether the petition satisfies statutory standards and whether the proposed change reflects the settlor’s intent or resolves a legitimate mistake. The judge considers the sufficiency of evidence, the interests of beneficiaries, and potential impacts on trust administration. If the court finds inadequate proof or that a requested change would contravene law or public policy, it may deny the petition or propose limited relief instead. Parties may be encouraged to negotiate or present alternative remedies if the court is reluctant to grant the precise modification sought. Preparing a well-supported petition with strong documentary evidence and clear legal arguments increases the likelihood of a favorable result. Courts also consider fairness and notice to all interested parties when making their determinations.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary based on complexity, contested issues, and the amount of court time required. Simple matters resolved by agreement generally incur lower fees, while contested petitions that require discovery, multiple hearings, or extensive briefing will be more expensive. Court filing fees and costs for serving notice are additional expenses to consider. We discuss likely ranges early in the process and provide cost estimates based on the facts of the case to help clients plan financially for the proceedings. Many clients reduce expense through early settlement efforts, thorough document preparation, and by focusing litigation on key contested issues. Efficient case management and clear communication about goals and priorities can control costs while still protecting important rights and interests. We work with clients to identify cost-effective strategies and to pursue resolution paths that align with their budgetary constraints.
Yes, heirs and beneficiaries may object to a proposed trust modification, and such objections are part of the normal adjudicative process. Objections can be based on perceived changes to expected distributions, concerns about trustee conduct, or doubts about the evidence supporting the petition. When objections arise the court may permit additional evidence, discovery, or argument to resolve disputed factual or legal issues before making a ruling. Managing objections typically involves addressing the substantive concerns through documentation, negotiations, or legal argument that clarifies intent and legal authority. In some cases mediation or settlement discussions facilitate compromise. If objections proceed to hearing, the court weighs evidence from all sides to determine whether modification is justified while respecting beneficiaries’ rights to due process.
Alternatives to a court petition include direct amendment by the settlor if alive and capable, and nonjudicial settlement agreements among all interested parties when the trust and statute permit. These paths often preserve privacy, are faster, and cost less, but they require unanimity or specific authority in the trust document. Mediation can also help parties reach a compromise without formal court rulings. Each alternative has trade-offs related to enforceability and protection against future challenges. When alternatives are viable they can produce an efficient resolution that updates the trust while minimizing acrimony. However, when parties cannot agree, or when statutory or factual obstacles prevent nonjudicial solutions, a court petition provides authoritative relief and clarifies rights and obligations for trustees and beneficiaries. Choosing the best course depends on case facts and the parties’ willingness to cooperate.
To start a trust modification petition in East Rancho Dominguez, gather all relevant estate planning documents, account statements, and any drafts or communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Contact our office to schedule an initial review where we will assess whether a nonjudicial amendment, settlement, or a court petition is most appropriate. We will explain procedural requirements, notice obligations, and likely evidence needed to support the requested change. After reviewing documents we advise on next steps, assist in identifying interested parties for proper notice, and help collect supporting declarations and exhibits. If a petition is filed we manage the preparation and filing, coordinate service, and represent clients in negotiations or at hearings, guiding the matter toward an efficient and lawful resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas