A Heggstad petition can resolve situations where assets that should have been transferred into a trust were instead left in a decedent’s individual name. In East San Gabriel and across Los Angeles County, families encounter confusion when a trust maker intended to fund a revocable living trust but assets were never retitled. This introductory overview explains how a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize those assets as trust property, enabling distribution according to the trust document rather than through intestacy or separate probate proceedings. Understanding this process helps reduce delay and expense during trust administration.
When a successor trustee discovers property that appears to belong to the trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition provides a clear legal path to correct the record. The petition typically requests a judicial determination that the asset was owned by the trust at the time of death, or that the decedent intended the trust to control that asset. For residents of East San Gabriel, pursuing this petition can avoid multiple probate matters and ensure beneficiaries receive their intended inheritances under the trust’s terms, while preserving the overall estate plan drafted by the trust maker.
A Heggstad petition protects the intent of the trust maker by confirming which assets are subject to the trust. This remedy reduces the chance that property will pass through intestate succession or duplicate probate, which can delay distributions and increase costs for beneficiaries. For trustees managing an estate in East San Gabriel, obtaining a judicial declaration saves time and clarifies title issues so that transfers to beneficiaries or into the trust registry proceed smoothly. The petition can also limit disputes by providing a formal court ruling, helping trustees and family members move forward with trust administration and asset distribution.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with trust administration matters throughout California, including Heggstad petitions in Los Angeles County and East San Gabriel. Our firm focuses on thorough document review, careful title analysis, and clear communication with successor trustees and beneficiaries. We guide clients through drafting the petition, gathering supporting evidence, and presenting the case to the probate court. Our goal is to resolve funding disputes efficiently while protecting the decedent’s intent and minimizing stress for family members during what is often a difficult time.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding brought to establish that certain property was intended to be held in trust, even though the title remained in the decedent’s name. The petition typically includes affidavits, copies of trust instruments, and evidence such as beneficiary designations, bank records, or other documentation showing intent to fund the trust. In East San Gabriel, initiating this petition begins with a thorough review of estate planning documents and asset records to create a coherent factual narrative demonstrating the decedent’s intent to place those assets into the trust.
The outcome of a successful Heggstad petition is a court order declaring the property to be trust assets, which allows the successor trustee to distribute the property according to the trust terms without separate probate administration. The process requires careful factual proof and clear legal arguments to show why title should be treated as belonging to the trust. Timing and documentation matter; starting promptly after the decedent’s death makes it easier to collect evidence and avoid disputes among beneficiaries or creditors, and it helps preserve records needed for court review.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial finding that listed assets were part of the decedent’s trust at the time of death despite being titled in the decedent’s individual name. The petition explains the circumstances that led to the mistaken title, such as oversight, clerical error, or incomplete funding, and presents corroborating evidence like trust language, account documents, and declarations from witnesses. The court then evaluates whether the preponderance of evidence shows intent to have the assets controlled by the trust. This legal mechanism restores the trust maker’s intended plan for distribution and administration of the estate.
A successful petition requires a clear statement of facts, authenticated trust documents, title records, and supporting declarations that explain why property was not retitled. The process involves preparing pleadings, filing in the appropriate probate court, serving interested parties, and responding to any objections. Evidence that supports intent might include beneficiary forms, draft deeds, bank correspondence, or testimony from those who assisted with the estate plan. The court may set a hearing where the trustee or petitioner presents the case, and after review, the judge issues an order resolving title and allowing distribution under the trust.
This glossary explains commonly used terms in Heggstad proceedings, such as trust funding, successor trustee, title retitling, and judicial declaration. Understanding these terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the legal process and know what to expect from filing through resolution. Clear definitions also aid in gathering the proper documentation and communicating effectively with the court. For those in East San Gabriel, familiarizing yourself with these terms makes the path forward more manageable and reduces confusion when working with legal representatives and court staff.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership or title of assets into a trust so that they become trust property and are controlled by the trust’s terms. Proper funding can involve retitling real estate, changing account registrations, assigning ownership of personal property, and updating beneficiary designations. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to show that the decedent intended the assets to belong to the trust. Funding ensures that assets avoid separate probate and are administered by the successor trustee under the trust instrument.
A judicial declaration is an order issued by the probate court stating the legal status of property, such as confirming that assets are trust property despite appearing in the decedent’s name. This declaration resolves title disputes and instructs the successor trustee on proper distribution. The petitioning party presents evidence to support the requested declaration, and the court evaluates whether the decedent’s intent and surrounding circumstances warrant treating the asset as trust-owned. Once entered, the declaration provides legal clarity and prevents duplicate or conflicting claims on the asset.
A successor trustee is the person or entity named in a trust to take over management and distribution of trust assets after the trust maker’s death or incapacity. The successor trustee has the responsibility to identify trust property, pay debts, and distribute assets to beneficiaries according to the trust terms. If property intended for the trust remains untitled, the successor trustee may bring a Heggstad petition to have the court confirm that property belongs to the trust. Acting promptly as successor trustee helps preserve the estate plan and reduces disputes among beneficiaries.
A pour-over will is a will designed to transfer any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name into their trust when they die. It acts as a safety net to capture assets that were not funded into the trust during life. However, unlike properly funded trust assets, property passing through a pour-over will may still require probate. A Heggstad petition can sometimes prevent assets from going through probate by confirming they were intended for the trust, thereby honoring the decedent’s plan and simplifying distribution for beneficiaries.
When a property appears outside the trust, trustees and beneficiaries may consider different approaches such as filing a Heggstad petition, initiating a separate probate, or resolving matters through informal agreement among heirs. A Heggstad petition seeks a court ruling that property was trust-owned, avoiding separate probate. Probate can be more time-consuming and public, while private settlement among heirs can be faster but may not provide legal clarity or protection for the trustee making distributions. Choosing the right approach depends on the strength of documentation, willingness of interested parties to cooperate, and the desired speed and certainty of distribution.
A limited or informal approach may succeed when documentation clearly shows the decedent intended the trust to hold the asset and all heirs and interested parties agree on disposition. In cases where bank records or beneficiary forms are unambiguous and beneficiaries trust the successor trustee, parties can sometimes reach an out-of-court resolution to transfer the asset into the trust or distribute it under trust terms. This path avoids court expense and delay, but it requires transparent documentation and cooperation among stakeholders to prevent later disputes or challenges to the transfer.
When the asset value is modest and there is little likelihood of contest, parties sometimes prefer informal transfers to minimize costs. If heirs are aligned with the trust maker’s intent and there are no competing claims, a simple retitling transaction or mutual release can resolve the issue. However, smaller value is not always decisive; prudent documentation and written acknowledgements from beneficiaries reduce future risk. In such situations, the informal route can be quicker, but it still benefits from legal oversight to ensure the transfer complies with applicable law and the trust instrument.
When ownership of significant assets is disputed or heirs contest the intended disposition, a formal Heggstad petition provides a definitive resolution through the probate court. Courts can evaluate evidence and issue a binding ruling that clarifies title and the proper party to manage and distribute the property. This avoids recurring disputes and protects trustees who must act in accordance with the trust instrument. When disagreements exist, formal legal action ensures fair consideration of competing claims and results in a clear, enforceable order to guide administration.
Complex title issues, multiple accounts with different registrations, or high value assets may require judicial intervention to confirm trust ownership and ensure proper transfer. A Heggstad petition allows the court to assess intricate factual records, review documentary evidence, and issue an order that resolves conflicting records. For trustees handling sizable estates in East San Gabriel, a court determination reduces risk of future litigation and clarifies the legal path for transferring or selling assets. This structured approach protects beneficiaries and provides transparency in administration.
A comprehensive, court-based approach to resolving funding issues helps secure a binding legal determination, reducing uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. When the probate court issues an order recognizing assets as trust property, it prevents subsequent claims that could otherwise reopen distribution decisions. This clarity is especially valuable for families managing complex estates or assets spread across multiple accounts and titles. Formal proceedings also produce a record that clarifies the trustee’s authority to manage, sell, or distribute the asset in line with the trust provisions.
Another benefit of a formal petition is the protection it offers successor trustees acting in good faith. With a court order, trustees can proceed without fear of later personal liability for distributing assets under the trust. Formal resolution also provides beneficiaries with the assurance that the trust maker’s wishes have been honored under judicial scrutiny. For residents of East San Gabriel, this reliable path helps families resolve disputes, move forward with estate administration, and preserve relationships by providing a neutral forum for resolving disagreements about asset ownership.
A court-ordered declaration gives legal clarity and makes subsequent enforcement straightforward if parties attempt to challenge the distribution. This clarity helps the successor trustee make decisions about selling or transferring property and gives beneficiaries confidence that distributions follow the trust’s terms. In contested situations, a court ruling reduces the chance of protracted litigation by establishing facts and legal conclusions that future courts will respect. The enforceable nature of the order is especially valuable where assets are significant or where family dynamics may lead to dispute without judicial intervention.
Although court proceedings require upfront time and expense, a successful Heggstad petition can streamline long-term administration by consolidating asset control under the trust. With property declared as trust-owned, trustees avoid separate probate estates and can manage assets coherently under the trust instrument. This consolidation minimizes duplicate administration tasks, lowers the risk of conflicting distributions, and expedites final closure of the trust administration. Ultimately, choosing a comprehensive legal route can save time and reduce uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries over the duration of estate settlement.
Collecting records promptly after a death makes it easier to prove that an asset was intended for the trust. Gather bank statements, account applications, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any communications with financial institutions or advisors that indicate the decedent’s intent. Early collection preserves documents that may be lost over time, and it helps create a clear narrative for a petition if one becomes necessary. Timely documentation reduces obstacles in court and supports a smoother administration process for the successor trustee and beneficiaries in East San Gabriel.
When material assets are untitled or when heirs disagree about ownership, filing a Heggstad petition can provide finality. A court determination removes doubt about whether those assets belong to the trust and helps trustees act confidently. Preparing a petition involves assembling convincing evidence and explaining the reasons behind the funding omission. While litigation is not always necessary, a petition is often the clearest way to resolve competing claims and protect the integrity of the trust’s distribution plan, particularly for larger estates or contentious family situations.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets were clearly intended to be trust property but remain in the decedent’s name, or when the successor trustee faces conflicting claims from heirs. This filing helps ensure assets are distributed according to the trust document rather than through intestate succession or multiple probate matters. The petition can prevent duplicative administration and possible creditor complications, while establishing a record that supports the trustee’s authority. For many families in East San Gabriel, the petition protects the estate plan and shortens the timeline to final distribution to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is also advisable when asset ownership is complex or involves high-value property that would create significant expense or delay if probated separately. Where documentation is available showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, a judicial declaration can concentrate the estate administration under the trust instrument, making the process more efficient and predictable. When heirs or institutions raise questions, the court’s involvement often resolves disputes and provides a binding path forward for trustees handling the estate in Los Angeles County.
Common circumstances include forgotten or overlooked deeds, bank accounts left in the decedent’s name, retirement plans with conflicting beneficiary designations, or transfers that were intended but not completed. Life changes, misfiled paperwork, and administrative oversights can leave significant assets outside the trust. When those assets should have been trust property, successor trustees often need a judicial declaration to bring them into the trust flow. Identifying these scenarios early and gathering supporting evidence helps streamline filing and improves chances of a favorable court decision.
One frequent issue is real estate that remains in the decedent’s name despite a trust instrument calling for its inclusion. Property deeds may not have been updated, or transfers intended before the decedent’s death may have been initiated but never completed. Because real estate often represents a significant portion of an estate’s value, clarifying its status through a Heggstad petition avoids separate probate for the property and lets the successor trustee manage or sell the real estate under the trust’s terms, consistent with the decedent’s wishes.
Financial accounts sometimes remain registered in the decedent’s individual name due to oversight or delays in paperwork. Even when the decedent intended those accounts to fund the trust, institutions may not process retitling without a court order. Filing a Heggstad petition allows the probate court to confirm that those accounts belonged to the trust, enabling the trustee to access and manage funds for payment of expenses, debts, and distributions. Prompt action preserves account records and supports the petition’s factual showing.
When beneficiary designations on retirement or insurance accounts conflict with trust provisions or when forms were not updated, the result can be confusion about who controls the asset. A Heggstad petition can reconcile these conflicts by presenting evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be managed by the trust. Courts review the totality of documentation to determine intent. Resolving these discrepancies through a petition helps trustees administer the estate in a manner consistent with the overall plan and reduces risks of successful challenges later.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance to trustees and families in East San Gabriel seeking to resolve trust funding issues. We assist with reviewing trust instruments, collecting supporting records, drafting petitions, and representing clients in probate court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, careful evidence gathering, and efficient handling of court procedures. Clients receive practical advice on the best strategy for their circumstances, whether that means pursuing a petition or exploring alternate resolution methods that preserve the decedent’s intended plan.
Clients choose our firm because we provide focused help with trust funding issues and probate petitions in California. We take time to understand the specifics of each estate, review all relevant documents, and explain the legal options available in clear terms. Our work includes preparing the petition, communicating with financial institutions and other interested parties, and presenting a persuasive factual record to the court. For trustees in East San Gabriel, we aim to make the process as straightforward as possible while protecting the trust maker’s intentions and the trustee’s interests.
In handling Heggstad petitions, our emphasis is on diligent preparation and transparent client communication. We help clients gather affidavits, title records, account histories, and other documentation that supports a claim that assets were intended to be held in trust. We also explain practical consequences of different approaches so trustees can weigh options conservatively. Throughout the process, we strive to reduce stress for family members by providing updates, answering questions, and coordinating necessary court filings and service of process in Los Angeles County.
Our firm assists with both uncontested and contested matters, working to resolve issues efficiently while preserving the trust maker’s wishes. We guide trustees through post-death administration, help coordinate with title companies and financial institutions, and represent clients at hearings when needed. By focusing on careful documentation, thoughtful strategy, and responsive client care, we aim to achieve durable resolutions so trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with confidence and clarity following the trust maker’s intended plan.
Our process begins with an initial review of trust documents, asset records, and title information to assess whether a petition is the appropriate path. We then collect corroborating evidence, prepare the petition and required declarations, and coordinate service on interested parties. If necessary, we represent the successor trustee at a court hearing to present the factual record and request a judicial declaration. Throughout, we keep trustees informed of milestones and recommended next steps so that administration proceeds in an orderly way and distributions can be made consistent with the trust.
The first step focuses on gathering trust documents, account statements, deeds, and any communications that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We examine beneficiary designations, account registrations, and any drafts or instructions that shed light on the intended ownership of assets. This initial review helps determine whether a petition is likely to succeed and identifies the strongest evidence to support the filing. We also advise on immediate actions trustees should take to preserve records and avoid inadvertent transfers that could complicate the case.
Document assembly includes obtaining certified copies of the trust, copies of deeds, account statements, and correspondence with financial institutions. Title research may involve checking recorder’s office records for deeds and liens, and obtaining account histories from banks or brokerages. These documents are organized into a factual narrative supporting the position that assets were intended to be trust property. Accurate, well-organized documentation strengthens the petition and aids the court in understanding the context of the funding omission.
We prepare sworn declarations and affidavits from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent or to actions taken to fund the trust. These statements often come from family members, advisors, or persons who assisted with trust administration. Declarations should address specific facts, such as conversations about funding the trust, attempts to retitle property, or drafts of transfer documents. Clear, focused affidavits help the court evaluate the petitioner’s claims and provide necessary corroboration for the requested judicial declaration.
Once the petition and supporting documents are ready, we file with the appropriate probate court in the county where the decedent resided or where the property is located. Proper service on interested parties is arranged according to court rules to ensure all parties have notice and the opportunity to object. Filing triggers statutory timelines and sets the matter for review. We handle procedural requirements and coordinate service to ensure compliance with local court procedures, helping avoid delays or procedural challenges that could impede resolution.
Filing the petition initiates the court’s involvement and results in assignment of a case number and scheduling of necessary hearings or timelines for responses. The petition must include clear statements of the relief sought and attach supporting exhibits. Proper filing also involves payment of required court fees and submission of any local forms. Accurate, timely filing is essential to move the matter forward and to give the court the information needed to review the petition efficiently and set appropriate next steps for consideration.
After filing, the petitioner must serve copies of the petition and notices to all interested parties, including beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors as required. If objections arise, we prepare responses and supporting evidence to address contested points. The court may set a hearing to adjudicate disputes. Handling objections thoughtfully and promptly helps maintain momentum toward resolution and increases the likelihood of obtaining the requested declaration. Clear communication with affected parties also preserves options for settlement where appropriate.
At the hearing, the judge reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections and then determines whether to issue an order declaring the property to be trust-owned. The court’s order clarifies title, authorizes transfer if necessary, and instructs the successor trustee on handling the asset. After the order is entered, the trustee can proceed with distributions, sales, or other actions authorized by the trust. The court’s decision creates a clear legal framework for administration and helps prevent future disputes over the asset.
During the hearing, the petitioner or trustee presents documentary evidence and sworn testimony, if needed, to support the claim that the asset belonged to the trust. The judge evaluates the credibility and sufficiency of the evidence, considering documents, declarations, and any admissions by interested parties. Clear organization and a focused presentation of facts increase the chance of a favorable ruling. The hearing also allows the court to request clarifying information and to give parties an opportunity to be heard before issuing its decision.
Once the court issues an order, the trustee receives formal authority to treat the asset as trust property and to take actions authorized under the trust. The order may instruct the county recorder or financial institutions to update title or account registration. With the order in hand, trustees can confidently distribute assets to beneficiaries, sell property if needed, or otherwise manage assets in accordance with trust provisions. The recorded order and related filings serve as permanent documentation of the court’s determination.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court to declare that certain property was intended to be held in a trust at the time of the decedent’s death despite being titled in the decedent’s individual name. It is used when assets were not properly retitled or transferred during the trust maker’s lifetime, and when the successor trustee seeks a judicial declaration to treat those assets as trust property. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, account records, deeds, and sworn declarations to show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This petition is an appropriate remedy when informal retitling is not possible or when there is a dispute among beneficiaries or institutions about ownership. A court order issued after the petition clarifies title, authorizes the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust, and helps avoid separate probate administration for the same property. Starting early in the process preserves records and supports a well-documented petition.
A Heggstad petition differs from probate because it seeks to confirm that the asset already belonged to the trust, avoiding administration in a probate estate. Probate generally determines how assets in the decedent’s individual name pass to heirs under a will or intestacy, and it is a separate process from trust administration. By contrast, the petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership so that the successor trustee may administer the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through probate court distribution. While probate resolves distribution of individually owned assets, a successful Heggstad petition consolidates administration under the trust and prevents duplicative proceedings. This can reduce delay and public exposure associated with probate, but the petition still requires court review and evidence to support the requested declaration.
Typical evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument, certified or notarized copies of deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence with financial institutions, and any drafts or instructions indicating an intent to fund the trust. Sworn declarations from those familiar with the trust maker’s intent—such as family members or advisors—also strengthen the case by explaining the history of efforts to retitle assets or the circumstances leading to the omission. Documentation that connects the asset to the trust maker’s estate plan and shows steps taken toward funding helps persuade the court. The more direct and contemporaneous the records, the easier it is to establish intent, so gathering complete and organized evidence is an important early step before filing the petition.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the case, the court’s calendar, and whether objections arise. Preparing the petition and assembling evidence can take several weeks to a few months, particularly if records must be obtained from banks, title companies, or government offices. Once filed, scheduling, service, and potential responses from interested parties add to the timeline; uncontested petitions can sometimes be resolved more quickly, while contested matters may take longer. Local probate court backlog and the need for a hearing affect overall duration. Prompt preparation, accurate documentation, and clear communication with interested parties can help streamline the process, but stakeholders should allow for several months of lead time in many cases to accommodate filings, service, and any necessary court hearings.
Filing a Heggstad petition, when successful, aligns distributions with the trust’s terms rather than with separate probate rules, so beneficiaries named in the trust will receive the asset according to the trust instrument. If the petition resolves ownership in favor of the trust, the successor trustee can distribute or manage the asset as provided by the trust, subject to any court orders addressing creditor claims or administrative obligations. If objections or competing claims exist, distributions may be delayed until the court resolves those issues. The petition’s purpose is to clarify ownership so the trustee can act consistent with the trust maker’s plan. Trustees should communicate with beneficiaries about expected timelines and any interim measures taken to preserve estate assets while the petition is pending.
Financial institutions sometimes require a court order before retitling or releasing funds when account registrations do not match the trust or when documentation is incomplete. Policies differ among institutions, and some may accept a letter, affidavit, or beneficiary designation to effect a transfer, while others insist on a judicial declaration to avoid future liability. When an institution refuses informal retitling, a Heggstad petition provides a binding court order that resolves the dispute and instructs the institution on how to proceed. Working with the institution to obtain account histories and written statements can provide helpful evidence for the petition. Where possible, coordinating with the institution early and presenting a clear petition supplemented by documentation reduces friction and supports a faster resolution, but the court order eliminates uncertainty for banks and title companies that are concerned about potential liability.
If heirs or other interested parties object to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider those objections and evaluate the evidence presented by all sides. Objections can lead to a contested hearing where each party has the opportunity to present documentation, declarations, and argument. The judge will weigh the totality of evidence regarding the decedent’s intent and the circumstances of the asset’s title to determine whether a judicial declaration is warranted. Objections may prolong the process and increase costs, but the court’s review provides a definitive result that reduces the likelihood of future disputes. In some situations, parties may choose to negotiate a settlement to avoid litigation, while in others the court’s determination is the clearest path to resolution and legal certainty for the trustee and beneficiaries.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include informal agreement among beneficiaries to retitle property, using a pour-over will and probating the asset, or pursuing a negotiated transfer with institutions if they accept supporting documentation. Informal resolutions can be faster and less expensive when parties are cooperative and the asset value is modest, but they may lack the enforceability and finality of a court order. Probate resolution may be appropriate when a pour-over will clearly applies or when trust funding is not supported by sufficient evidence. Each alternative has trade-offs related to time, cost, publicity, and legal finality. In cases with significant value or potential disputes, the petition often provides the clearest outcome. Trustees should consider the strength of available evidence, the likelihood of objection, and the goals of the beneficiaries when choosing whether to pursue a petition or an alternative path.
Yes, petitions filed in probate court generally become part of the public record, including filings, exhibits, and the court’s order. This transparency helps ensure that interested parties receive notice and have the opportunity to object, and it provides a durable, searchable record of the court’s determination regarding asset ownership. While public filing protects interested parties’ rights and promotes fairness, it also means some details of estate administration become accessible through court records. For clients concerned about privacy, discussing strategies with legal counsel can help minimize unnecessary disclosures and tailor filings to include only essential supporting documents. In some cases, confidential exhibits or redacted material may be considered where permitted, but parties should plan for the typical public nature of probate court filings when pursuing a Heggstad petition.
To start a Heggstad petition in East San Gabriel, begin by gathering all trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any communications that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman or another probate practice to schedule a case review where we can assess the documentation and advise on the strength of a petition. Early review allows us to identify key evidence, request records from financial institutions, and recommend next steps to preserve relevant documents and legal rights. After reviewing the materials, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, file with the appropriate probate court, and coordinate service on interested parties. We explain timelines and possible outcomes so trustees and beneficiaries understand the process and can plan accordingly. Taking these initial steps promptly helps build a well-supported petition and advance the probate process toward a clear legal resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas