A trust modification petition can be essential when circumstances change or when a trust no longer reflects a grantor’s current intentions. Residents of El Segundo and the surrounding Los Angeles County communities often seek adjustments to trust terms to address new family dynamics, tax considerations, or changes in asset ownership. Our page explains what a trust modification petition involves, who may file one, the typical legal standards applied in California courts, and practical steps you can take to pursue a modification. This overview helps you decide whether a petition is the appropriate course for your situation.
Navigating trust changes requires careful documentation and adherence to state law. A petition to modify a trust may be uncontested when beneficiaries and trustees agree, or it may require court review to resolve disputes or ambiguities. This guide outlines common grounds for modification, how the process generally works in Los Angeles County courts, timelines you might expect, and how to prepare supporting evidence. Whether you are a trustee, beneficiary, or settlor considering adjustments, understanding the process reduces surprises and helps preserve relationships while protecting assets and intentions.
A properly pursued trust modification petition can clarify ambiguities, correct drafting errors, adapt to changed circumstances, and prevent future disputes. Modifying a trust through the court can preserve the original intent while updating provisions to reflect current family situations, newly acquired assets, or changes in tax law. Doing this lawfully helps protect beneficiaries’ interests and ensures trustees have clear directions. When handled sensitively, a modification can avoid costly litigation down the road by resolving potential conflicts early and creating enforceable revisions that align the trust with present realities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across California with a focus on estate planning and trust-related matters. We work with clients in El Segundo and throughout Los Angeles County to assess whether a trust modification petition is appropriate and to manage the legal process with clear communication. Our attorneys prioritize careful analysis of the trust document, collecting necessary evidence, and explaining options to clients so they can make informed choices. We are committed to practical, client-centered advocacy that seeks durable resolutions while respecting family relationships and the settlor’s intent.
A trust modification petition asks the court to change the terms of an existing trust for valid legal reasons recognized under California law. Typical bases include mistakes in the original document, changes in circumstance that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or agreements among interested parties to alter provisions. The court evaluates petitions based on statutes and case law, often looking for clear evidence that the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent or corrects an obvious error. Knowing the legal grounds and evidence required helps set realistic expectations for outcome and timing.
The process begins with a thorough review of the trust document and relevant facts, followed by preparing and filing a petition in the proper probate or superior court. Interested parties are notified, and the court may hold hearings to consider objections or additional evidence. In many cases, parties reach agreements that the court then approves. In contested matters, the court decides based on credibility of evidence and applicable legal standards. Understanding each step and preparing solid documentation can make the process more efficient and reduce the potential for prolonged disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court seeking amendment of an existing trust instrument. It applies when circumstances have changed since the trust was drafted, when there is evidence the written terms do not reflect the settlor’s intent, or when parties mutually agree to restructure distributions or trustee powers. The petition details the requested changes and the legal basis for those changes, and it includes evidence such as testimony, documents, or prior communications. The court’s role is to ensure changes are lawful and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent.
Essential elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested changes, the legal grounds supporting the modification, identification of interested parties, and supporting evidence. The process typically involves document review, drafting the petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and trustees, attending hearings if necessary, and obtaining a court order that memorializes the modification. Timely communication with all parties and careful evidence gathering, such as updated financial records or testimony about the settlor’s intent, significantly strengthens a petition and helps the court reach a resolution.
Understanding common legal terms helps demystify the modification process and clarifies what to expect when filing a petition. This glossary covers terms frequently encountered in trust modification matters in California, such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, and material mistake. Familiarity with these terms can help you better understand petitions, court filings, and communications with trustees or other interested parties. Clear definitions make it easier to follow the legal process and ensure your documentation addresses the legal standards courts apply.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intent, as reflected in the trust document and surrounding circumstances, is central to many modification petitions because courts typically aim to preserve or honor that intent. When proposing changes, petitioners often present evidence about what the settlor intended, such as prior drafts, correspondence, or testimony from those familiar with the settlor’s plans. Accurate identification of the settlor and their intent helps the court determine whether a modification is appropriate.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties, including loyalty and prudent administration, and must act in beneficiaries’ best interests. In a modification petition, a trustee may be a party to proceedings and may support or oppose changes based on fiduciary considerations. Clear documentation of trustee actions, accountings, and communications can be important evidence when assessing whether proposed modifications preserve the settlor’s intent and comply with legal obligations.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to receive benefits from the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have legal rights to notice of trust proceedings, to review certain trust records, and to contest proposed modifications when they believe the changes harm their interests. When parties propose modifications, courts weigh beneficiary interests against evidence that the change aligns with the settlor’s intent. Engaging beneficiaries in discussions and providing transparent documentation often reduces disputes and can lead to agreed modifications that the court will approve.
A material mistake refers to an error in the trust document that misstates the settlor’s intent, while changed circumstances are events that make the original trust terms impractical or inconsistent with the settlor’s purpose. Either can justify a petition to modify the trust if supported by credible evidence. Examples include omitted provisions, changed tax law, or significant changes in family structure. Courts assess whether the proposed modification corrects the error or adapts the trust in a manner consistent with what the settlor would likely have wanted.
When a trust needs revision, parties can often pursue negotiated amendments, obtain a written agreement among all interested parties, or file a trust modification petition with the court. Negotiated solutions and agreements can be faster and less costly when beneficiaries and trustees are cooperative and documentation supports the change. A court petition is appropriate when parties disagree, when clarification is needed, or when statutory procedures require judicial approval. Choosing the right path depends on the nature of the change, the strength of supporting evidence, and whether all parties are willing to resolve matters collaboratively.
Minor clarifications or administrative adjustments to a trust can often be addressed through a written agreement among the trustee and beneficiaries without court involvement. These changes may include correcting typographical errors, clarifying ambiguous terms, or updating administrative provisions that do not alter beneficiaries’ core distribution rights. When parties are in agreement, documenting the change and obtaining legal review can reduce the risk of future disputes. This approach is typically faster and less expensive than filing a petition, but it requires cooperation and clear evidence that the change does not contradict the settlor’s intent.
Administrative updates such as changing trustee contact information, replacing a trustee due to incapacity, or updating successor trustee names can often be handled without court approval if the trust instrument provides for such changes. These updates streamline trust administration and ensure continued management of trust assets without altering distribution provisions. Even when the trust allows administrative changes, documenting the reasons and following trust procedures is important to avoid later challenges. Clear records and timely notice to beneficiaries help maintain trust integrity during routine updates.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often necessary when parties dispute proposed changes or when the settlor’s intent is ambiguous. In these situations, gathering and presenting persuasive evidence to the court—such as prior drafts, witness statements, or financial records—can be critical to achieving a favorable resolution. Representation also helps ensure procedural compliance, including proper notice and filing requirements, which can be decisive. Skilled legal guidance helps build a clear case that aligns proposed modifications with the settlor’s probable intent while protecting clients’ legal rights throughout the process.
When proposed trust revisions involve complex asset structures, tax implications, or significant financial consequences, thorough legal analysis and coordination with financial advisors may be required. A comprehensive approach evaluates how changes will affect tax liabilities, retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, or special needs provisions. Proper planning helps avoid unintended tax consequences and ensures that modifications integrate smoothly with the settlor’s overall estate plan. Courts also expect clear, well-documented reasoning when changes affect major assets or long-term distribution strategies.
A comprehensive strategy minimizes the risk of future disputes by ensuring that proposed modifications are legally sound, well-documented, and aligned with the settlor’s intent. This approach includes detailed document review, careful evidence gathering, coordination with financial professionals when needed, and clear communication with all interested parties. A court-approved modification provides lasting clarity and enforceability, reducing ambiguity for trustees and beneficiaries. Investing time upfront in a thorough approach often saves resources and stress over the long term by preventing contested litigation.
Comprehensive handling also helps preserve family relationships by encouraging transparent negotiation and documenting agreed terms in a way the court can uphold. When modifications are supported by solid evidence and legal reasoning, the court is more likely to approve them without protracted litigation. This approach also identifies potential tax or administrative pitfalls and addresses them proactively. Ultimately, a thorough process protects assets, clarifies trustee authority, and helps ensure the settlor’s updated intentions are respected and carried out effectively.
When a modification is achieved through a comprehensive legal process and approved by the court, the resulting order provides greater legal certainty and enforceability. This reduces the chance of future challenges from beneficiaries or third parties and gives trustees clear direction on how to administer the trust post-modification. Properly recorded court orders and updated trust records also help successor trustees and fiduciaries follow the settlor’s revised plan, avoiding confusion and potential mismanagement of assets.
A comprehensive review anticipates and addresses unintended consequences such as tax exposure, retirement account conflicts, or impacts on special needs benefits. By evaluating the full estate plan context, legal counsel can recommend modifications that achieve the settlor’s goals without creating new problems. This thoroughness helps ensure that changes are implemented in a way that preserves intended distributions, maintains eligibility for public benefits where appropriate, and aligns with related estate planning documents like pour-over wills or powers of attorney.
Collecting documentation early strengthens any petition to modify a trust. Relevant materials include the original trust document and any drafts, financial account statements, correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent, and witness recollections. Timely organization of records helps demonstrate the rationale for proposed changes and can make negotiations with other parties more productive. Keeping a chronological file of events and communications reduces uncertainty, supports your position, and streamlines preparation for filings or court hearings when necessary.
Assessing tax and administrative consequences before pursuing substantive trust changes is important. Modifications can affect income tax reporting, retirement plan distributions, or eligibility for certain benefits. Consulting with financial professionals or accountants in tandem with legal review helps identify potential consequences and craft modifications that achieve intended goals without adverse financial impact. Being proactive in this way reduces surprises and ensures that court-approved revisions fit within the broader estate plan.
People pursue trust modifications for many reasons, including to correct drafting errors, reflect changes in family relationships such as births or deaths, accommodate new tax laws, or address newly acquired assets. Sometimes a settlor’s intentions were not fully captured in the original document, or circumstances have changed so substantially that the trust no longer achieves its original purpose. A petition can update terms to align with current realities, clarify ambiguous language, or reassign trustee powers to ensure effective trust administration going forward.
Other common reasons include resolving unanticipated consequences of trust provisions, adapting to beneficiaries’ changing needs, or consolidating estate planning documents for consistency. When a trust interacts with life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, or special needs arrangements, targeted modifications can preserve intended benefits without disrupting other planning components. If parties are uncertain about whether a modification is appropriate, a careful legal review can identify practical options and potential outcomes to help guide decision making.
Circumstances that commonly prompt trust modifications include ambiguous drafting that creates uncertainty about distribution, major changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage, significant changes in asset ownership, or legal developments that affect trust administration. Unexpected events like a beneficiary’s disability or a shift in financial needs may also warrant modification. Identifying the specific circumstance is the first step in determining whether a negotiated update or a court petition is the appropriate remedy to align the trust with current needs and intentions.
Ambiguous language within a trust can lead to misunderstandings among trustees and beneficiaries and may merit a formal modification to clarify intent. When a provision produces conflicting interpretations or leaves trustee powers uncertain, petitioning the court to interpret or modify the terms can provide definitive guidance. Clearer language prevents administration problems, reduces the risk of disputes, and helps ensure distributions are made as the settlor intended. Documentation of intent and consistent supporting evidence is important in these cases.
Significant family changes such as marriage, divorce, the birth of grandchildren, or the death of a beneficiary often prompt consideration of trust modifications. These events can alter distribution needs or the settlor’s priorities, making updates necessary to reflect current relationships and responsibilities. A modification petition can realign the trust with the settlor’s present wishes and help avoid future disagreement among family members. Addressing such matters proactively helps preserve relationships and ensure fair administration consistent with current circumstances.
Acquiring substantial new assets, inheriting property, or encountering changes in tax law can render existing trust provisions outdated or impractical. Modifying the trust can ensure assets are handled in the most effective manner possible and that tax consequences are considered. When retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, or business interests are involved, comprehensive review and potential modification help integrate new assets into the overall estate plan, maintain intended beneficiary designations, and address any tax implications associated with the change.
We provide legal services for clients in El Segundo, nearby Beach Cities, and throughout Los Angeles County. Whether you need guidance on pursuing a trust modification petition, negotiating a settlement, or reviewing your estate planning documents, we offer practical legal support and clear communication about your options. Our approach focuses on helping clients understand the legal standards, anticipate possible outcomes, and take steps that preserve their interests and relationships. Contact us to discuss your specific circumstances and next steps.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman combines decades of estate planning practice with a focus on thoughtful client communication. We assist clients in evaluating whether a trust modification petition is necessary, gathering supporting documentation, and representing clients through negotiation or court proceedings. Our legal services emphasize clear explanations of potential risks and benefits, tailored strategies, and careful handling of sensitive family matters. Clients benefit from a methodical approach that seeks durable results while keeping them informed at every stage of the process.
Clients turn to our firm when they need steady guidance through the complexities of trust law and trust administration. We help identify legal options, coordinate with financial advisors when tax or asset issues arise, and prepare persuasive filings that address the court’s concerns. Our goal is to achieve outcomes that honor the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ interests. We also work to minimize conflict when possible by encouraging constructive dialogue and exploring settlement opportunities prior to formal litigation.
From initial consultations through court proceedings, we focus on actionable advice that reflects California law and local court practices. We assist with associated documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and certifications of trust where they affect or are affected by proposed modifications. For clients in El Segundo and throughout Los Angeles County, we strive to make the process clear, efficient, and responsive to personal needs, helping clients reach decisions that are practical and legally sound.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents, followed by an assessment of the legal grounds for modification and possible outcomes. We then identify interested parties, gather supporting evidence, and pursue negotiation or file a petition in the appropriate court. Throughout, we keep clients informed of procedural requirements, timelines, and likely next steps. If court proceedings are needed, we prepare the case with detailed documentation and present arguments that align proposed changes with the settlor’s intent and applicable legal standards.
The initial step involves carefully reviewing the trust, any related estate planning instruments, and records that illuminate the settlor’s intent. This review helps determine whether a modification petition is warranted and identifies potential evidence or defenses. We examine financial records, correspondence, and prior drafts, and we discuss relevant facts with interested parties. A thorough assessment at the outset clarifies the strengths and weaknesses of proposed changes and shapes the strategy for negotiation or court filing.
Examining the trust document and associated estate planning materials is essential to identify ambiguous clauses, omitted provisions, or inconsistencies. We look for evidence of the settlor’s intent in drafts, memos, or witness accounts and assess how the trust interacts with other instruments like pour-over wills and powers of attorney. Understanding these relationships helps determine the scope of necessary changes and whether a court petition or a negotiated amendment best addresses the issue. Clear documentation supports a persuasive case for modification.
Part of the initial work is identifying who must be notified and who may object, including beneficiaries, trustees, and successors. We gather witness statements, financial records, and any written communications that support the proposed changes. Understanding the positions of interested parties early allows us to anticipate objections and develop strategies to address concerns. Engaging with parties constructively can lead to agreements that the court will approve, while a well-documented evidentiary strategy strengthens a contested petition if one becomes necessary.
If negotiation does not resolve the matter, we prepare and file a formal petition with the appropriate probate or superior court. The petition sets forth the requested changes and the legal basis supporting them. After filing, we serve notice to all required parties and provide them an opportunity to respond. The court may schedule hearings to consider evidence and arguments. Careful compliance with procedural rules and timely service is critical to avoid delays or procedural dismissals during this phase.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires a clear statement of the requested modification, a legal rationale, and supporting evidence such as declarations, documentary proof, and witness statements. The petition should present a coherent narrative showing why the change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or corrects a material mistake. Well-organized exhibits and concise legal argumentation help the court assess the request efficiently and reduce the risk of prolonged evidentiary disputes or additional rounds of filing.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is essential and must comply with statutory requirements. After service, parties may file responses or objections, and we work to address concerns either through negotiation or by preparing rebuttal evidence. Effective case management involves coordinating deadlines, responding to discovery requests when appropriate, and attempting to mediate disputes when feasible. Maintaining an organized record of service and communications protects procedural rights and supports the petition’s credibility.
If the court schedules hearings, we present evidence and argument to support the requested modification and respond to objections from other parties. The court may issue an order granting, denying, or modifying the requested relief. Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the changes, updating trust records, and ensuring trustees follow the new terms. If the order requires additional steps, such as accountings or follow-up filings, we guide clients through the remaining requirements to finalize the modification.
At hearings, presenting organized, credible evidence can be decisive. We prepare witness testimony, documentary exhibits, and legal argument that explain why the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or remedies a material mistake. Addressing objections thoroughly and respectfully helps the court evaluate competing positions. Courts appreciate well-prepared presentations that narrow issues and demonstrate a legitimate need for modification, which can streamline decision-making and reduce post-order appeals or further disputes.
After the court issues an order, it is important to implement the changes promptly and document the updated trust records. This includes providing copies of the court order to trustees and beneficiaries, updating account records, and ensuring successor trustees understand their duties. Where related instruments are impacted, such as pour-over wills or powers of attorney, coordinating updates helps maintain a cohesive estate plan. Proper implementation reduces future confusion and ensures the settlor’s revised intentions are carried out effectively.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with a California court seeking to change the terms of an existing trust. It is used when a trust’s language is ambiguous, when new circumstances make the original provisions impractical, or when evidence shows the settlor intended something different than what the written document states. The petition explains the requested changes, the legal basis for those changes, and includes supporting evidence such as declarations, financial records, or witness statements. The court reviews the petition and decides whether to approve the requested modification based on the settlor’s probable intent and applicable law. Individuals who may file a petition include trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested parties with standing under California law. At times, the settlor may seek court approval before death if allowed by the trust instrument and statute. Interested parties must be notified of the petition so they can object or support the proposed changes. When parties reach an agreement, courts often approve stipulated modifications, but contested cases require presenting evidence and legal argument to persuade the court that the change is appropriate and lawful.
California recognizes several grounds for modifying a trust, including correction of a material mistake, reformation to conform to the settlor’s intent, or modification due to changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s original purpose. Courts also consider whether all interested parties have agreed to a change, in which case judicial approval may be streamlined. Statutes and case law guide courts on what constitutes sufficient evidence to support a modification and how the settlor’s intent should be interpreted in context. Support for a modification typically relies on persuasive documentation such as prior drafts, contemporaneous communications, witness testimony, or clear evidence of changed circumstances. The stronger and more coherent the evidentiary record, the more likely the court is to approve a requested change. If parties disagree, the court will weigh competing evidence and legal arguments to determine whether the modification should be granted under California principles.
The timeline for a trust modification in Los Angeles County varies depending on whether the parties agree, the complexity of the issues, and court scheduling. An uncontested modification where parties reach an agreement and file a stipulated request may conclude in a few months after filing and service. Contested matters that involve discovery, multiple hearings, or complex evidentiary disputes can take significantly longer, potentially many months to over a year, depending on court calendars and case complexity. Early preparation and effective communication with interested parties can shorten the process. Properly prepared petitions with well-organized supporting evidence reduce the likelihood of procedural delays, and mediation or negotiation efforts can resolve disputes more quickly than contested litigation. Timing also depends on the need for expert financial analysis, witness availability, and the court’s docket at the time of filing.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification and raise challenges in court. When beneficiaries believe a proposed change harms their interests or does not reflect the settlor’s intent, they may file objections and present evidence opposing the petition. The court will consider those objections alongside the petition and supporting materials, evaluating credibility, documentary proof, and applicable law to decide whether the modification should be approved. Even when beneficiaries object, parties can often resolve disputes through negotiation or mediation before trial. Courts view efforts to reach agreement favorably, and settlements that protect beneficiary interests are commonly presented for court approval. If disputes cannot be resolved, well-prepared evidence and clear legal argument are essential to address beneficiary objections and persuade the court that the modification is appropriate.
Modifying a trust can affect related estate planning documents, including pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and life insurance or retirement plan beneficiary designations. It is important to review the entire estate plan when considering modifications to ensure that changes are consistent and do not create unintended conflicts. Coordinating updates helps maintain an integrated plan that functions as intended across multiple instruments and accounts. When a court approves a trust modification, parties should update trust records and notify relevant financial institutions or plan administrators if the modification affects account ownership or beneficiary designations. Where other documents require revision to reflect the modified trust, taking a coordinated approach avoids inconsistencies and reduces the risk of future disputes or administrative complications during trust administration.
Helpful evidence for a modification petition includes prior drafts of the trust, written communications that reflect the settlor’s wishes, financial records showing changed assets, and witness declarations from individuals who knew the settlor’s intentions. Documentary evidence that establishes a consistent pattern of intent or clarifies ambiguous language is particularly persuasive. Organizing this evidence clearly and presenting it alongside a focused legal argument strengthens the petition. Evidence that demonstrates changed circumstances, such as medical records, affidavits describing altered family needs, or account statements showing newly acquired assets, can also be important. The more directly the evidence connects the proposed change to the settlor’s intent or to legitimate practical needs, the more likely the court will view the modification as appropriate. Thorough documentation reduces uncertainty and increases the chance of judicial approval.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating amendments among the trustee and beneficiaries, entering into a written settlement, or using trust provisions that permit administrative changes without court involvement. When all interested parties agree and the trust instruments allow for such changes, a negotiated approach can be quicker and less costly than formal litigation. These solutions require cooperation, clear documentation, and sometimes a neutral mediator to facilitate discussions. However, when parties cannot reach agreement or when statutory procedures require judicial review, a petition may be necessary. It is important to evaluate the strength of your position and the willingness of other parties to negotiate. Early efforts at communication and mediation often lead to mutually acceptable outcomes and can preserve relationships while avoiding the expense and uncertainty of contested court proceedings.
Court fees and litigation costs vary depending on the complexity of the case and the duration of proceedings, and they can exceed the costs of a negotiated settlement. Filing fees, service costs, attorney time, and potential expert fees for specialized analysis all contribute to the expense of a contested petition. Negotiated agreements often reduce these costs by avoiding prolonged discovery and multiple hearings, making them a more cost-effective choice when parties can reach a fair resolution. That said, an early settlement that compromises on important legal rights may not always be in a client’s best interest. Assessing potential costs against the likelihood of success and the significance of the requested changes helps determine whether negotiation or litigation is more appropriate. A realistic appraisal of costs and outcomes aids informed decision making about the best path forward.
If a trustee refuses to comply with a court order, the court has mechanisms to enforce its directives, which may include sanctions, appointment of a new trustee, or orders compelling compliance. Beneficiaries or interested parties can request enforcement remedies to ensure the trustee follows the court’s ruling. Courts take compliance seriously and may impose penalties or other remedies to protect the trust and beneficiaries’ interests. When enforcement becomes necessary, presenting clear evidence of noncompliance and following court procedures for enforcement petitions is critical. Acting promptly to request enforcement prevents further harm to trust assets and ensures fiduciary obligations are upheld. In some instances, successor trustee appointment or supervision may be ordered to restore proper administration of the trust.
To begin a trust modification in El Segundo, start by gathering the trust document, any drafts, related estate planning instruments, and records that explain the current circumstances or the settlor’s intent. Contact a law firm with experience in California trust matters to review the materials, discuss potential grounds for modification, and evaluate whether negotiation or a petition is the best option. Early consultation helps identify key issues and develop an effective strategy tailored to your situation. The firm will explain procedural requirements, notice obligations, and potential timelines, and begin assembling supporting documentation if a petition is warranted. If parties are open to settlement, the firm can facilitate discussions and help draft an agreement for court approval if needed. Taking organized, deliberate steps at the outset improves the chances of a successful and cost-effective outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas