A Heggstad petition can resolve a common and often confusing problem that arises when a decedent intended to fund a trust but some assets remained solely in their name at death. In Hermosa Beach and across California, these matters require careful review of trust documents, probate filings, and property records to confirm intent and transfer ownership appropriately. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition does, when it is used, and how the process can help complete an estate plan so the settlor’s wishes are honored without unnecessary delay or expense for family members and beneficiaries.
Families facing an unfunded trust often worry about cost, timelines, and whether assets will pass according to the decedent’s plan. A Heggstad petition offers a pathway to establish that certain assets were intended to be held in trust and to request a court order reflecting that intention. While the petition is commonly used for real property, it can apply to other assets featured in estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, transfer-on-death accounts, and retirement plan beneficiary designations. This overview sets realistic expectations about the legal process and available outcomes in California.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition can prevent unintended intestacy or probate administration, allowing assets to pass consistent with the decedent’s trust plan. This remedy helps family members avoid transferring property through formal probate when the settlor clearly intended a trust to control distribution. The court order resulting from a successful petition confirms trust ownership, enabling title companies and financial institutions to re-title assets to the trust. That confirmation reduces administrative friction, limits delay in distributions, and preserves privacy by keeping asset transfers out of public probate proceedings whenever possible.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on practical estate planning and trust administration for California families, combining careful document review with responsive client communication. Our approach emphasizes listening, documenting intent, and coordinating with title companies, banks, and court clerks to move petitions forward efficiently. We guide clients through gathering supporting evidence, preparing declarations, and filing the petition in the appropriate California court. Throughout the process we prioritize clear explanations of possible outcomes, timelines, and costs so families can make informed decisions about resolving unfunded trust matters in Hermosa Beach and throughout Los Angeles County.
A Heggstad petition asks a California court to recognize that certain property was intended to be part of a trust despite not having been formally retitled before the settlor’s death. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, supporting declarations showing the settlor’s intent, title or account statements for the asset in question, and any other relevant documents such as pour-over wills or transfer-on-death forms. The court evaluates evidence of intent and may issue an order directing that the asset be treated as trust property, facilitating transfer and administration in accordance with the trust terms rather than probate laws.
Because a Heggstad petition asks the court to infer intent, the quality and completeness of supporting documentation matters. Common supportive evidence includes the trust document itself, consistent beneficiary designations, prior communications reflecting intent, and deeds or account records that match items listed in the trust schedule. The process may also involve notifying interested parties, responding to objections if they arise, and coordinating the court order with title companies or financial institutions to effectuate the necessary transfers. Clear organization of records and thoughtful legal presentation improve the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized probate court filing used to reassign assets to a trust when a settlor intended those assets to be held in trust prior to death but failed to complete the transfer. The petition relies on evidence of the settlor’s intent and legal principles that permit the court to treat the property as if it had been transferred. While not appropriate in every situation, this remedy is commonly used for real estate or accounts that remain in the decedent’s name yet match descriptions or schedules in a trust document, and where there are no valid competing claims from creditors or alternate beneficiaries.
Successful petitions generally include a clear trust instrument, contemporaneous documents or testimony supporting the settlor’s intent, and property records linking the asset to the trust’s schedules or descriptions. The process often involves preparing a verified petition, attaching declarations and exhibits, serving notice to interested persons, and filing with the probate court. Courts will consider whether evidence demonstrates a settled intent to place the asset in trust. If the court finds sufficient proof, it issues an order treating the property as trust property and directing any necessary ministerial steps to record or retitle the asset accordingly.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process and communicate effectively with professionals. This section defines words and concepts you are likely to encounter such as settlor, trust instrument, petition, notice, and court order. Familiarity with these terms clarifies what evidence is needed, the types of documents that support a petition, and the procedural steps required by California probate courts. Clear definitions also reduce misunderstanding when coordinating title transfers or when discussing potential objections and timelines with family members or institutions.
The settlor is the individual who created and funded the trust, setting out the trust’s terms and naming beneficiaries. In the Heggstad petition context the settlor’s intent at or before death is central; courts look for actions and documents demonstrating that the settlor intended certain assets to become trust property. Evidence can include the trust document, contemporaneous correspondence, trust funding schedules, or consistent designation of beneficiaries. Clarifying the settlor’s intent is essential to showing that retained title was an oversight rather than an intentional exclusion from the trust.
A petition is the formal court filing that requests judicial action or recognition; a Heggstad petition specifically asks the probate court to treat identified property as having been held in trust. The petition sets out factual and legal grounds, attaches supporting declarations and documents, and requests the court enter an order directing that the asset be considered trust property. The petition must comply with local court rules, include required notice to interested persons, and present evidence sufficient to convince the court that the settlor intended the property to be in the trust.
The trust instrument is the written document that establishes the trust, names beneficiaries, and specifies how trust assets should be managed and distributed. For a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is a primary piece of evidence to show the settlor’s intent and the terms governing the asset in question. The instrument may include schedules that list property, pour-over provisions that funnel probate assets into the trust, and amendment history that clarifies changes. Courts compare the instrument’s terms with external records to assess whether property should be treated as trust-owned.
A court order in the Heggstad petition process is the formal ruling that acknowledges an asset should be treated as trust property and instructs the appropriate ministerial steps to effectuate the transfer. Once entered, the order can be recorded with a county recorder or presented to financial institutions to re-title accounts and real estate. The order provides legal confirmation to third parties that the property belongs to the trust, which facilitates distribution and administration according to the trust’s terms instead of probate procedures.
When property intended for a trust remains outside it at death, options include initiating probate, pursuing a Heggstad petition, or using informal procedures where allowed by institutions. Probate is the default route for nontrust assets but can be time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition may allow assets to move into the trust without full probate administration, provided the court recognizes the settlor’s intent. Which path is best depends on asset types, potential creditor claims, the identities and locations of beneficiaries, and whether clear documentation supports a petition. Families should weigh timelines, costs, and privacy considerations when choosing a strategy.
A limited administrative transfer or informal resolution may be appropriate when the trust document and related records clearly identify the asset and financial institutions or title companies are willing to accept the documentation without a court order. If banks or county recorders accept a certified trust and supporting declarations, parties can sometimes retitle property without litigation. This approach is faster and less costly than a court petition but depends on the willingness of third parties to accept the documents and the absence of disputes among beneficiaries or competing claims that would require a judicial determination.
When the asset has relatively low value and there is consensus among heirs and beneficiaries, a practical administrative solution may suffice. Institutions sometimes process transfers based on a combination of trust documents, death certificates, and affidavits of personal representative or successor trustee. This route minimizes expense and delay, but it is only reliable when the documentation is persuasive and no creditor issues or competing claims are present. Families should ensure clear records exist and consult counsel to confirm that an informal transfer will accomplish their goals without risking future contests.
Comprehensive legal action, including a Heggstad petition, is often necessary when ownership is disputed, beneficiaries disagree, or creditors may have claims against the decedent’s estate. In these circumstances, relying on informal transfers risks future reversal or litigation. A court order resolves disputes by making a legal determination about whether the asset was intended to be trust property, providing stronger protection for successor trustees and beneficiaries. Preparing a full petition with robust evidence and legal arguments helps address objections and creates a clearer path for recording or re-titling the asset.
High-value real estate, property with complex title issues, or assets involving out-of-state elements often require a formal court order to ensure a smooth transfer. Title companies and financial institutions typically demand definitive legal documentation before changing ownership of significant assets. A Heggstad petition provides that judicial determination, minimizing the risk of later challenges and facilitating clear title insurance or account re-registration. When substantial assets are involved, the added certainty and enforceability of a court order generally justify pursuing a petition rather than relying on informal administrative procedures.
Choosing a comprehensive approach with a Heggstad petition provides legal certainty that assets will be administered under the trust terms, reduces the likelihood of post-transfer disputes, and supports clear title for real estate and accounts. A court order addresses competing claims and creates a record that third parties are more likely to accept, which streamlines subsequent distributions. This formal route can protect beneficiaries from future challenges and reduce the administrative burden on successor trustees by providing definitive instructions recognized by institutions and other parties.
Although a petition involves court filing and procedural steps, the long-term benefits often outweigh the upfront effort for significant or contested assets. The clarity provided by a court determination can also help preserve family relationships by resolving disputes through neutral legal analysis rather than prolonged informal negotiation. In addition, an order that reassigns assets to the trust keeps transfers out of public probate administration, preserving the privacy of the trust’s terms and avoiding the costs and publicity associated with full probate proceedings in California courts.
A primary advantage of seeking a court order is the legal finality it provides. Once the court determines that property should be treated as trust assets, title companies and financial institutions are far more likely to accept the order and complete re-titling or transfer. This clarity reduces the risk of subsequent disputes over ownership, which can delay distributions and increase costs. For real property transactions, an order that can be recorded with the county recorder is especially valuable for achieving marketable title and enabling successor trustees to manage or sell the property as the trust directs.
By documenting the court’s determination, a Heggstad petition helps protect beneficiaries and successor trustees against later challenges from heirs or creditors. The judicial finding serves as authoritative evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, making it harder for parties to mount successful contests. This protection is particularly important when significant assets are involved or where family relationships are strained. The court process provides a structured forum for resolving disputes and leaves a written record that supports stable administration of the trust going forward.
Start by collecting the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, beneficiary designations, and related estate planning documents like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. Gathering this documentation early helps identify which assets were intended for the trust and supports a clear narrative for a petition or administrative transfer. Organized records reduce research time, improve the quality of declarations, and increase the likelihood that institutions will accept transfer documents or that a court will find the evidence persuasive in a Heggstad proceeding.
Give timely notice to beneficiaries and other interested persons, as required by California law, and keep family members informed about the steps you are taking. Transparent communication reduces the chance of surprises and contested objections, and may encourage cooperative resolution without litigation. When disputes do arise, well-documented communication can serve as evidence of intent and consistency with the trust’s terms. Clear records and respectful dialogue often lead to faster outcomes and lower costs for everyone involved.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a settlor’s trust exists but certain assets were never formally transferred before death and those assets are significant or likely to be disputed. If failing to secure a court determination would force assets into probate or create uncertainty about ownership, a petition provides a route to complete trust administration. This option is particularly relevant for real estate, retirement accounts lacking trust beneficiary designations, or accounts that were intended to pour over into the trust via a will. Timely action helps preserve the settlor’s plan and reduces administrative complications for successors.
Also consider this service when title companies or financial institutions refuse to accept trust documentation without judicial confirmation, or when heirs disagree about distribution. A Heggstad petition can clarify intent and produce a formal order that institutions accept to re-title property or permit trustee control. While informal transfers sometimes work for low-value items or when all parties agree, contested or high-value assets typically benefit from the certainty and enforceability a court order provides. Assessing the particular asset, relationships among interested persons, and institutional requirements will guide whether a petition is the right path.
Typical circumstances include real estate titled only in the decedent’s name despite a trust schedule listing the property, bank or investment accounts that were overlooked for retitling, or situations where a pour-over will indicates trust intent but assets were not transferred. Other triggers include transfers attempted near the settlor’s death that remained incomplete, or beneficiary designations that do not align with the trust plan. Each situation requires gathering supporting documents and assessing whether the evidence will satisfy a California probate court that the trust was the intended owner.
A frequent scenario involves real estate appearing on a trust schedule but still recorded solely in the decedent’s name. Recording errors, oversight, or delayed closings can leave title unchanged. Because county recorders and title insurers generally require clear proof of ownership, a Heggstad petition can provide the judicial confirmation needed to re-record the property in the name of the trust. Preparing a petition in such cases involves presenting the deed, trust instrument, and any additional evidence that supports the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust.
Accounts with significant balances that were not transferred into the trust before death can create delays and disagreements among survivors. Financial institutions may refuse to re-title accounts without a court order, especially when account names and beneficiary designations conflict with the trust. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the settlor’s intent and direct re-registration of accounts in the trust. Presenting statements, beneficiary forms, and trust schedules supports the petition and assists institutions in processing the change in ownership.
Pour-over wills are intended to move assets into a trust at death, but when assets remain titled in the decedent’s name, the will alone may not be sufficient for immediate transfer. When a pour-over will indicates the settlor’s plan to direct assets into the trust, a Heggstad petition can complement that document by asking the court to treat specific items as trust property. Combining the will, trust instrument, and supporting evidence strengthens the legal argument that the settlor intended the assets to be administered under the trust terms.
For Hermosa Beach families dealing with unfunded trusts, local representation ensures familiarity with Los Angeles County probate procedures and county recorder practices. We assist in collecting documents, preparing declarations, filing the petition, and coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to effectuate transfers. Our team communicates with beneficiaries and provides clear timelines for each step. Whether the matter is straightforward or contested, we work to present persuasive evidence to the court and to secure an outcome that aligns with the settlor’s written plan while minimizing costs and delays.
Clients turn to our firm for careful document review and thorough preparation of court filings that present a clear case for trust ownership. We prioritize organizing supporting evidence such as deeds, account records, and communications that demonstrate intent, and we prepare declarations that explain the facts in plain language. Our goal is to obtain the judicial recognition necessary to transfer assets to the trust while avoiding unnecessary litigation when possible. Clear writing, attention to procedural rules, and proactive coordination with third parties are central to our approach.
We also focus on client communication and setting realistic expectations about timing and potential outcomes. The Heggstad petition process involves court procedures and notice requirements, and we explain those steps in a straightforward manner so clients know what to expect. When institutions require additional documentation or when objections arise, we advise on practical strategies for resolution and represent clients’ interests in court proceedings as needed, always aiming to protect the settlor’s plan and the beneficiaries’ rights.
Finally, our practice integrates estate planning documents that commonly coexist with Heggstad petitions, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance directives, and related instruments. By reviewing the full estate plan and related records, we can identify additional issues that may affect administration or distribution and recommend corrective steps. That holistic perspective helps ensure the trust functions as intended after assets are properly titled and reduces the risk of future disputes among heirs and successors.
Our process begins with an intake that gathers trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any related estate planning instruments. We then evaluate the strength of the evidence showing the settlor’s intent and recommend either an administrative transfer approach or a court petition. If a petition is advisable, we prepare the verified petition, declarations, and exhibits, serve required notices, and file with the probate court. We follow up with title companies and institutions after a court order to ensure transfers are recorded and accounts retitled in the name of the trust.
The first step is collecting and reviewing all relevant documents to form a comprehensive picture of the settlor’s intent and the asset’s status. This includes the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and any correspondence that references intended transfers. After assessing the evidence, we advise whether an administrative approach may succeed or whether a Heggstad petition is the prudent path. A thorough initial review greatly improves the quality of the petition and the prospects for an efficient resolution.
We help clients identify and retrieve records from banks, title companies, county recorders, and financial institutions that hold the contested assets. Accurate account statements, recorded deeds, and any lists or schedules that reference the property are particularly important. If records are missing, we assist in obtaining copies from institutions or public offices. Complete and well-organized documentation forms the backbone of a persuasive petition and reduces the need for additional discovery or follow-up requests during court proceedings.
After collecting documents, we analyze whether the trust instrument and supporting records reliably show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. We look for consistency among documents, timing of transactions, and any written or witnessed statements from the settlor that indicate intent. Where gaps exist, we identify other evidence that may help, such as statements by witnesses or contemporaneous communications. This evaluative stage determines whether to pursue an administrative transfer or prepare a court petition.
If a court petition is necessary, we draft a verified petition that lays out the facts, attaches the trust instrument and supporting exhibits, and presents legal authority for treating the asset as trust property. The petition includes declarations from knowledgeable persons, copies of relevant records, and a proposed form of order for the court. We ensure the filing meets local rules, prepare required proof of service and notices for interested persons, and submit the petition to the appropriate probate department in Los Angeles County for consideration.
We prepare sworn declarations from the successor trustee, witnesses, or other individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the asset. Exhibits typically include the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that corroborates the trustee’s statements. These materials are organized to present a coherent narrative that addresses potential counterarguments and meets the court’s standards for demonstrating intent to treat the property as trust-held.
After filing, we serve required notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties as required by California law. If objections or competing claims arise, we respond with additional evidence and legal argument to address concerns. The goal is to resolve disputes efficiently through documentation or court procedures, while protecting the trustee’s ability to manage and distribute trust assets. Where possible we seek stipulations or negotiated resolutions to shorten timelines and reduce litigation costs.
Once the court grants the petition, we obtain the signed order and coordinate necessary ministerial actions such as recording the order with the county recorder or presenting it to banks and title companies to re-title assets. We guide successor trustees through the steps needed to update records, obtain title insurance if required, and proceed with distribution according to the trust. Implementing the court order promptly helps finalize administration and provides the beneficiaries with clarity about the trust’s assets and next steps.
Following the court’s order, we assist in preparing grant deeds or other documents required to record the change of ownership with the county recorder, and we coordinate with title companies to clear any title issues. For bank and investment accounts, we work with institutions to re-register accounts in the trust’s name, provide certified copies of the order, and ensure beneficiary distributions proceed in accordance with the trust. These administrative tasks complete the transfer and enable the trustee to manage trust property effectively.
Once assets are retitled to the trust, the successor trustee carries out management duties including inventorying assets, notifying beneficiaries of distributions, and preparing any required accountings. We advise trustees about their fiduciary duties and assist with preparation of trustee reports or accountings when necessary. Ensuring these closing steps are handled carefully helps prevent later disputes and confirms that the settlor’s instructions are carried out responsibly and transparently for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing asking the probate court to recognize that a particular asset was intended to be part of a decedent’s trust despite not being formally transferred before death. The petition presents the trust document, supporting declarations, and relevant records to show the settlor’s intent. This remedy is appropriate when assets remain titled solely in the decedent’s name but documentation indicates they were meant to be trust property, and when relying on informal transfers is unlikely to succeed or would create legal risk. You should consider a petition when the asset is valuable, when third parties such as title companies require judicial confirmation before re-titling, or when there are likely to be disagreements among heirs. If the documentation is clear and institutions refuse to accept administrative retitling, a petition provides authoritative court recognition that simplifies subsequent transfers and reduces the risk of later disputes about ownership and distribution under the trust.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Los Angeles County varies depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether objections are filed. A straightforward petition with cooperative parties may resolve in a few months from filing to order, while contested matters or those requiring additional evidence can take longer. Court hearing availability and the need to serve notice on interested persons also affect timing. Preparing a well-documented petition at the outset helps reduce procedural delays and can shorten the overall timeline. Factors that can lengthen the process include missing records that must be obtained, objections that require briefing or additional hearings, and complications with title or beneficiary designations. Engaging counsel early to gather documents, draft persuasive declarations, and comply with local court requirements improves the chance of an efficient resolution. After the order is entered, administrative steps like recording or retitling with institutions may add additional time to complete the transfer.
Courts look for evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to be held in trust. Helpful materials include the trust instrument itself and any schedules listing the property, deeds or account statements linking the asset to the decedent, and contemporaneous communications or records indicating the settlor’s plan. Declarations from the successor trustee or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent are frequently used. The combination of written documents and sworn statements builds a persuasive record for the court. Additional supportive evidence may include pour-over wills, beneficiary designation forms consistent with the trust, and prior attempts to transfer the asset into the trust that remained incomplete. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence is with the trust’s terms, the more likely the court will find that the asset should be treated as trust property. Clear organization and thorough presentation of exhibits are important in persuading the court.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent the need to administer the particular asset through full probate because the court’s order treats the asset as already belonging to the trust, allowing it to be managed and distributed under the trust’s terms. While the petition does not automatically eliminate all probate for other assets, it can remove specific items from probate administration and streamline the process for the trust. This outcome provides privacy and often reduces time and expense compared to probate for those assets. However, whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the overall estate and which assets remain outside the trust. If multiple assets are unfunded or creditor claims exist, some probate steps may still be necessary. A petition is a tool to realign ownership with the settlor’s plan and should be considered alongside a review of the entire estate plan to determine the best overall strategy for administration and distribution.
Yes. Filing a probate petition typically requires serving notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties under California law. This notice requirement ensures that those with potential legal interests have an opportunity to object or participate in the proceeding. Proper service and compliance with notification rules are part of the petition process and help maintain the integrity of the court’s decision by providing all interested parties a chance to be heard. Because notice is required, parties who might object are made aware of the petition early in the process. If an objection is filed, the court will consider the objection and any supporting evidence. Addressing notice requirements carefully helps avoid delays caused by improper service and ensures the petition proceeds smoothly toward a hearing and potential order.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary with complexity, required court filings, and whether the matter is contested. Fees include court filing costs, costs of obtaining certified documents or records, and professional fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. If the process is uncontested and documentation is clear, expenses can be more modest, while contested matters with hearings and discovery increase expense. Clients should expect an initial assessment to estimate likely costs based on the specific facts and the level of evidence needed. To manage costs, gathering complete documentation and attempting administrative resolutions with institutions when feasible can reduce the scope of court involvement. Early consultation helps prioritize the most efficient path: an administrative transfer where appropriate or a focused court petition when judicial confirmation is necessary for significant assets or when title issues exist.
If an interested person objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and any additional evidence or argument presented by both sides. Objections might contest the settlor’s intent, raise creditor claims, or dispute beneficiary designations. When objections arise, we respond with evidence and legal argument tailored to address the specific concerns, and if necessary, present testimony or additional documentary proof at hearings to support the petition. The court’s role is to weigh the evidence and rule on whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Handling objections may extend the timeline and increase costs, but the formal court process provides a structured way to resolve disputes. A strong initial petition that anticipates likely objections and addresses them proactively reduces the likelihood of prolonged contested proceedings and improves the chance of a favorable outcome for the trustee and beneficiaries.
Heggstad petitions are used most commonly for real property, but they can also apply to other assets such as bank or investment accounts when documentation supports that the settlor intended those assets for the trust. Retirement accounts and payable-on-death designations can present additional complexity because they often have beneficiary designations governed by plan rules. If a retirement account or other account lacks a trust designation but the trust and related documents indicate intent, a petition may be appropriate to seek judicial recognition and facilitate transfer when plan administrators require a court order. Each institution has its own procedures, so success depends on the quality of evidence and institutional requirements. Because retirement plan rules and tax considerations can be involved, we evaluate each account type and coordinate the petition with counsel or plan administrators as needed to ensure proper handling and to address any regulatory or procedural obstacles preventing transfer.
Recording the court order with the county recorder is commonly necessary for real property transfers so the public record reflects the change in ownership to the trust. The recorded order, often accompanied by a grant deed prepared pursuant to the court’s direction, enables the title to be cleared and any subsequent sales or financings to proceed with the trust as owner. Recording provides third parties and future purchasers with notice of the court’s determination and helps establish marketable title for the trustee’s use of the property. For bank and investment accounts, presenting certified copies of the order to the institution is typically sufficient for re-registration. Each institution has its own requirements for accepting court orders and retitling accounts. We assist clients in determining what actions are required post-order and in coordinating with title companies, county recorders, and financial institutions to complete the transfer process promptly and in compliance with procedural requirements.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition later, review and complete trust funding tasks during lifetime by transferring deeds, re-titling accounts, updating beneficiary designations, and confirming ownership matches the trust’s schedules. Regular estate plan maintenance, including checking titles and account registrations after significant life events, reduces the risk that assets will remain outside the trust at death. Clear communication and recordkeeping about the settlor’s intentions also help successor trustees and family members understand how assets were meant to be managed. If there are assets that cannot be transferred easily during life, consider documenting the intent to include them in the trust through clear written schedules or contemporaneous declarations, and ensure pour-over wills and beneficiary forms align with the trust. Periodic reviews with legal counsel help identify and correct discrepancies, minimizing the need for court intervention after death and ensuring a smoother transition for trustees and beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas