A general assignment of assets to a trust can be a practical tool in estate planning, allowing individuals to transfer property into a living trust with clarity and control. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our focus is on helping clients understand how a general assignment works, why it may be appropriate for certain assets, and how it interacts with other estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, certification of trust, and powers of attorney. This introduction outlines the basics, how the process fits into a broader plan, and initial steps to consider before transferring assets into a trust.
Deciding whether a general assignment of assets to a trust is the right move requires a careful review of asset types, ownership structures, and your overall goals for protection and distribution. This portion of the guide explains how an assignment differs from direct retitling, when a general assignment might be used as a temporary measure, and how it affects beneficiaries and successor trustees. We also touch on practical matters like beneficiary designations, retirement account considerations, and potential tax and administrative implications to keep in mind during the transfer process.
A general assignment of assets to trust serves multiple practical purposes within a comprehensive estate plan. It can streamline the transfer of property into a trust, support a pour-over will strategy, and help avoid certain probate steps for assets that are properly assigned. Benefits include enhanced privacy for the estate, consolidated management of assets by a trustee, and a clearer path for distributing property according to the grantor’s wishes. This paragraph explores common benefits while noting the need to coordinate assignments with beneficiary designations, titles, and other planning documents to ensure the assignment accomplishes the intended outcome.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a long history of serving California clients with practical estate planning, including living trusts, wills, and related documents. Our approach is client-centered and focused on producing documents that work within California law and the personal circumstances of each client. We assist with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and assignments to trusts, providing hands-on guidance through the decision and signing process. Our aim is to make estate planning accessible, understandable, and effective for families, business owners, and individuals across San Jose, Inglewood, and surrounding communities.
A general assignment of assets to trust is a legal instrument that transfers ownership of specified property into the name of a trust, often simplifying administration and preserving the grantor’s intent for asset management. This transfer can be used with many types of assets, though techniques differ depending on whether property is real estate, tangible personal property, bank accounts, or securities. The assignment should be drafted to clearly identify the trust, the grantor, and the assets being transferred, and it must be executed in accordance with California law to be effective. Proper documentation and coordination with beneficiary designations prevent unintended gaps or conflicts.
While the general assignment can streamline the process of funding a trust, it is important to understand limitations and practical mechanics. Not all assets can be transferred solely by a general assignment; some require retitling or beneficiary changes, such as retirement accounts or vehicles with transfer restrictions. The assignment works best when combined with a review of account titles and beneficiary forms. This section clarifies when an assignment is sufficient versus when retitling is necessary, and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive review to ensure trust funding is complete and effective.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is typically a written declaration that certain property is assigned to the trust for management and distribution according to the trust document. It operates as a conveyance from the grantor to the trust, often signed and dated in the presence of a notary. The assignment should identify the trust by name and date, and specify whether it transfers all assets listed on a schedule or particular items. In practice, it functions as part of the trust funding process and should be used in combination with other estate planning documents to ensure a seamless transition of property upon incapacity or death.
Executing a general assignment involves several key elements, including clear identification of the trust, accurate listing or scheduling of assets, proper signatures, and in many cases notary acknowledgment. The process typically begins with an inventory of assets, followed by determination of which items can be assigned versus which require separate retitling or beneficiary updates. Additional steps include recording deeds for real property when necessary and updating account documentation for financial holdings. Coordination with trustees and successor trustees ensures that the trust will be able to administer the assigned assets effectively when the time comes.
Understanding common terms related to a general assignment helps demystify the process and makes communication with legal counsel and financial institutions clearer. This section defines terms such as grantor, trustee, successor trustee, pour-over will, trust funding, and designation of beneficiaries. Clear definitions reduce confusion about roles, responsibilities, and the legal effects of transferring property into a trust. Knowing the vocabulary also assists clients in reviewing documents and making informed choices about how to title assets and which form of transfer best fits each asset type.
Grantor refers to the individual who creates the trust and transfers assets into it. The grantor retains the authority to establish the terms of the trust, designate beneficiaries, and often maintains certain powers over the trust while alive if it is revocable. The grantor’s intent and instructions are central to the trust document, and any assignment of assets is typically signed by the grantor to effect the transfer. Understanding the grantor’s role clarifies who authorizes the assignment and who may later amend, revoke, or otherwise interact with the trust under the plan.
Trust funding is the process of moving assets into the trust so that the trust holds legal title or control over those assets. This process can involve general assignments, deed transfers for real property, retitling bank and investment accounts, updating beneficiary designations, and providing copies of trust documentation to institutions. Effective funding is essential to ensure the trust operates as intended and that the trust’s distribution instructions take effect without unnecessary delay or court involvement. Proper funding reduces the risk of assets passing through probate and clarifies the trustee’s role in management.
The trustee is the person or entity charged with holding and managing trust assets according to the terms outlined by the grantor. The trustee’s responsibilities include preserving trust property, making distributions to beneficiaries, and handling administrative tasks such as paying bills and filing tax returns when required. Choosing the right trustee is a matter of trustworthiness and administrative ability, and successor trustees are named to step in if the initial trustee is unable or unwilling to serve. The assignment of assets to the trust grants the trustee the authority to manage those assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
A pour-over will is a will designed to transfer any assets not previously placed into a trust into the trust upon the testator’s death. It works as a safety net to catch assets that were not assigned or retitled during the grantor’s lifetime, directing them to the trust for distribution under the trust terms. While a pour-over will can help consolidate assets under the trust, assets passing under a will may still be subject to probate, so combining a pour-over will with proactive trust funding is the most effective way to minimize probate exposure.
When considering how to move assets into a trust, clients often weigh options such as general assignments, direct retitling, beneficiary designation changes, and beneficiary trusts. Each method has advantages and limitations: assignments can be efficient for certain asset classes, retitling provides clear title transfer, and beneficiary designations handle specific accounts like life insurance and retirement plans. This section compares these approaches, highlighting considerations such as ease of administration, effect on probate, tax implications, and interactions with existing ownership arrangements like joint tenancy or community property ownership.
A limited approach, such as assigning only a few tangible items or updating beneficiary designations, may be sufficient for individuals with straightforward asset structures or small estates. If most assets already pass outside probate via beneficiary designations, joint ownership, or payable-on-death designations, a targeted assignment or minor retitling might accomplish funding goals without a wholesale retitling of every account. The important step is to inventory assets and confirm that the chosen method truly places those assets under trust control or ensures they pass to intended beneficiaries without unnecessary delay or litigation.
In some cases, a general assignment can serve as a temporary measure while more comprehensive retitling is arranged. This approach can be useful during life transitions, such as relocation or the sale of significant assets, where immediate retitling would be impractical. The assignment documents should clearly indicate the intended long-term plan and be followed up with permanent retitling or beneficiary updates once circumstances allow. Using an assignment as an interim step requires careful documentation to avoid confusion or institutional resistance when future title changes occur.
A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when assets include real property, business interests, retirement accounts, and assets with transfer restrictions or tax implications. Comprehensive planning coordinates assignments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and trust terms to manage tax exposure and ensure assets are properly titled. It also accounts for unique documents like irrevocable life insurance trusts or retirement plan trusts. This level of planning helps prevent unintended outcomes such as assets being excluded from the trust or creating tax complications, and it ensures the trust operates smoothly in the grantor’s absence.
Family considerations, such as minor beneficiaries, blended families, or beneficiaries with special needs, often require a more comprehensive planning approach. Properly structured trusts and assignments can establish protections, management guidelines, and distribution schedules that reflect the grantor’s wishes while providing continuity. Comprehensive planning addresses contingencies like incapacity, guardianship nominations, and successor management to ensure assets are preserved and managed responsibly. Taking a holistic view reduces confusion, avoids disputes, and supports the grantor’s objectives for legacy and care of loved ones.
A comprehensive approach to funding a trust offers several important benefits, including reduced likelihood of probate, clearer asset management, and a stronger framework for handling incapacity and succession. This method coordinates retitling, beneficiary updates, and assignments to make sure the trust truly holds the assets intended by the grantor. It can also reveal gaps in planning, recommend protective measures like irrevocable trusts when appropriate, and provide a written plan for successor trustees and beneficiaries. Overall, the goal is to create a durable plan that aligns legal form with practical effect.
Comprehensive funding reduces administrative friction for family members and trustees by minimizing disputes and clarifying distribution pathways. When assets are properly assigned and documented, successors can follow a clear roadmap for management and distribution, which reduces delays and costs. This approach also allows for proactive consideration of tax planning, creditor protection, and special circumstances such as planning for a beneficiary with special needs or preserving assets for long-term care considerations. Thorough planning fosters peace of mind and helps ensure the grantor’s intentions are carried out respectfully.
One of the most tangible benefits of properly assigning assets to a trust is reduced exposure to probate administration. When assets are placed into a trust or pass via nonprobate mechanisms, they typically avoid the delays and public nature of probate proceedings. This benefit can save time and expense for survivors, ensuring beneficiaries receive assets in line with the grantor’s wishes in a more private manner. Proper documentation and consistent titling are key elements in realizing this benefit and avoiding unintended probate for assets that were not effectively transferred.
A fundamental advantage of funding a trust comprehensively is that it provides a clear plan for management if the grantor becomes incapacitated. With assets properly in the trust, the named trustee can manage finances, pay bills, and handle ongoing affairs without court appointment or guardianship processes. This continuity preserves the grantor’s autonomy and reduces family stress. Ensuring that powers of attorney align with trust arrangements and that financial institutions recognize the trustee’s authority are practical steps that support effective incapacity planning within a comprehensive estate framework.
Before preparing a general assignment, make a detailed inventory of all assets you intend to place into the trust. Include real estate descriptions, account numbers, title holders, and any contractual restrictions. Knowing what you own and how it is currently titled prevents surprises and helps determine whether a general assignment suffices or whether retitling or beneficiary changes are necessary. A complete inventory streamlines conversations with financial institutions and ensures that documentation is accurate and complete at signing.
After executing a general assignment and related trust funding steps, maintain organized records including signed assignments, deeds, account correspondence, and trust certificates. Follow up with banks, title companies, and investment firms to confirm that retitling or beneficiary updates were processed correctly. Timely follow-up prevents administrative errors and ensures assets are recognized as part of the trust. Providing successor trustees with clear copies of these records will ease future administration and reduce confusion for family members.
A general assignment can be an efficient way to place assets into a trust as part of a larger estate plan. Individuals may choose this service to centralize management, prepare for incapacity, or complement a pour-over will strategy. This approach is especially relevant when clients want to consolidate ownership under a trust while handling certain assets through specific retitling or beneficiary updates. Considering a general assignment is often part of a broader review of how different assets should be titled and administered to accomplish long-term objectives.
Beyond administrative benefits, a well-crafted assignment supports privacy and continuity in family affairs by minimizing the need for probate for funded assets. It can also provide clearer guidance for successor trustees and beneficiaries when combined with complete trust documentation and supporting instruments like powers of attorney and health care directives. Prospective clients should consider both immediate needs and future events, such as potential incapacity or life changes, when deciding whether to use a general assignment as part of their estate planning toolkit.
People turn to general assignments in a range of circumstances, including establishing a new trust and needing to fund it, consolidating scattered assets under one plan, or using an assignment as a temporary measure during property transfers. Other common situations include aligning assets after life changes such as marriage, divorce, or relocation, and ensuring that personal property and certain nonfinancial holdings are recognized as part of the trust. This service provides a practical tool for clients who want to ensure their trust covers the intended property without unnecessary complexity.
When creating a revocable living trust, clients typically need to place assets into the trust so that the trustee can manage them on behalf of beneficiaries. A general assignment may be used to transfer ownership of personal property and certain financial instruments into the trust, making it easier to administer the estate plan. This step is frequently accompanied by deeds for real property and retitling for accounts. Proper documentation ensures that the trust functions as intended during the grantor’s lifetime and after death.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, or the sale of a business can change the composition of one’s assets and prompt updates to estate planning documents. A general assignment can help incorporate newly acquired or redistributed property into an existing trust, keeping the plan current. It is important to evaluate each asset’s legal and tax standing during such transitions and to make corresponding updates across beneficiary designations and account titles to prevent assets from unintentionally falling outside the trust framework.
Preparing for potential incapacity often motivates clients to fund a trust so that a named trustee can step in and manage affairs without court intervention. Assigning assets into the trust can simplify access to funds for care, bills, and ongoing living expenses if the grantor becomes unable to manage finances. Coordinating this step with powers of attorney and advance health care directives ensures a cohesive plan for both financial and medical decision-making, reducing the burden on family members during stressful times.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical estate planning support to clients in Inglewood and across Los Angeles County. We assist with all stages of trust creation, funding, and administration, including general assignments, deeds, and related documents like certification of trust and pour-over wills. Our office helps clients clarify objectives, inventory assets, and implement a plan that aligns with California law. For residents of Inglewood seeking reliable guidance on trust funding and estate coordination, we offer consultations and individualized planning tailored to each client’s needs.
Clients who engage our services receive careful attention to detail in the drafting and execution of assignments and trust documents. We provide clear explanations of options for funding a trust and help clients navigate institutional requirements for retitling or recording deeds. Our office works with clients to create a comprehensive plan that integrates living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives in a cohesive manner. Throughout the process, we emphasize communication and practical steps that produce reliable, enforceable results.
We prioritize making the process as straightforward and efficient as possible by preparing clear documents, coordinating with title companies and financial institutions when needed, and confirming that the trust receives proper recognition. Our services are designed to reduce administrative burdens on families and ensure that successor trustees have the necessary documentation to administer the trust effectively. This hands-on assistance helps prevent common pitfalls such as incomplete funding or inconsistent beneficiary designations.
In addition to document preparation and coordination, we assist clients with strategic considerations such as how assignments interact with retirement accounts, life insurance, and potential long-term care planning. Clients receive guidance on practical matters like record-keeping and succession planning while ensuring the legal clarity of assignments and trust instruments. Our approach is to provide a durable plan that respects the client’s intentions and supports smooth administration when needed.
Our process for handling a general assignment and broader trust funding starts with an initial consultation to review assets and objectives. From there, we prepare the required documents, coordinate retitling or deed recording if needed, and guide clients through signing and notarization. We follow up with institutions to confirm that transfers are processed and maintain a file with executed documents for future reference. Clear communication at each step ensures that clients understand what was done and why, and provides heirs and trustees with a complete record.
The first step is performing a detailed inventory and planning session to identify assets, titles, and beneficiary designations. This review reveals which assets can be transferred using a general assignment and which require retitling or separate beneficiary changes. We discuss your goals and suggest an integrated plan that may include deeds, certificates of trust, and updates to account documentation. This groundwork prevents gaps and creates a roadmap for efficient implementation that aligns with California legal requirements and personal objectives.
Gathering documents is a practical but essential part of the process. Collect deeds, account statements, trust documents, life insurance policies, and any contractual paperwork that affects ownership or transferability. Accurate documentation helps determine whether a general assignment will accomplish the transfer or if retitling or beneficiary updates are needed. Bringing these items to the planning session enables informed decisions, smooth document drafting, and fewer follow-up issues with institutions or recording offices.
Not all assets transfer in the same way, so identifying the best method for each item is critical. We review titles, account rules, and any restrictions to determine whether a general assignment, deed, or beneficiary designation is the appropriate route. This stage includes prioritizing actions that affect probate exposure and confirming the legal effect of each transfer method. The result is a clear plan that specifies next steps and assigns responsibilities for completing each transfer efficiently.
After planning, we draft the assignment and any required supporting documents, including deeds, certificates of trust, and retitling instructions. Documents are prepared accurately to reflect trust names, dates, and asset descriptions, and we coordinate signing and notarization to meet legal and institutional requirements. We advise on witnessing and recording for deeds when necessary and provide instructions for submitting documents to banks and custodians. Proper execution at this stage ensures the intended legal effect of each transfer.
Drafting clear assignment language is important to avoid ambiguity about which assets are included and under what terms. We prepare assignments that identify the trust and specify whether they cover listed items or a broader set of property, and we review the draft with clients for accuracy. This review step helps ensure the assignment reflects the client’s intent and prevents later disputes. A precise written assignment is a central element in trust funding and serves as a reference for trustees and institutions.
Proper signing and notarization are necessary for many assignment documents and deeds. We arrange for execution in accordance with California requirements and provide guidance on where notarization or witnessing is needed. When deeds are involved, we coordinate recording with the county recorder’s office. After signing, we assist clients in distributing executed copies to relevant institutions and retaining originals in a secure location. Ensuring execution compliance prevents challenges and clarifies legal effect.
The final step is confirming that transfers are processed and establishing an ongoing maintenance plan. We follow up with financial institutions, title companies, and recording offices to verify that assets are recognized as part of the trust. We provide clients with a complete set of executed documents and recommendations for periodic reviews, particularly after major life events or changes in assets. Ongoing maintenance ensures the estate plan remains current and effective over time.
Verification involves confirming with banks, brokers, and title offices that the trust is properly recognized on accounts and deeds. Some institutions require particular forms or may have internal procedures for accepting trust documentation. We communicate with these entities as needed to resolve issues and confirm that the trust holds the assigned assets. This verification step reduces the likelihood of later administrative complications and provides assurance that the asset transfers achieved their intended outcome.
Establishing a review schedule helps keep the plan current as circumstances change. We recommend periodic reviews after significant life events, changes in asset holdings, or shifts in family circumstances. These reviews identify assets requiring additional action, such as new retitling or updated beneficiary designations. A regular review schedule helps maintain alignment between the trust and actual asset ownership, preserving the intended benefits of trust funding for the long term.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a written declaration by the grantor that certain property is transferred into the trust, often used to place personal property or other eligible assets under trust control without individually retitling each item. Retitling, by contrast, changes the recorded ownership of an asset, such as recording a deed in the trust’s name or changing account ownership with a financial institution. The assignment can be an efficient method in some situations but may not be sufficient for all asset classes, so it must be evaluated in light of the specific items involved and institutional requirements. When deciding between an assignment and retitling, it is important to inventory assets, review account rules, and consult with legal counsel to confirm the most reliable method for funding the trust. Some assets, like bank and investment accounts or real property, frequently require formal retitling or recorded deeds to effect a transfer. Others, like tangible personal property, may be appropriately assigned. The right approach depends on the type of asset, the legal requirements, and the client’s overall objectives for privacy, probate avoidance, and management continuity.
A general assignment can help move assets into a trust, but avoiding probate depends on whether each asset is properly transferred into the trust in a manner recognized by California law and the institutions holding the assets. Assets that remain titled in an individual’s name or that pass by beneficiary designation may still be subject to probate unless the title or beneficiary designation is changed to reflect the trust. Therefore, assignments should be part of a comprehensive funding strategy that ensures each asset is placed in a nonprobate transfer pathway. To reliably reduce probate exposure, it is important to confirm that deeds are recorded for real estate, account titles are changed where necessary, and beneficiary forms are updated when appropriate. The pour-over will can catch assets not placed in the trust, but assets passing under a will may still require probate. A coordinated review and follow-up with institutions helps confirm that the trust holds the intended assets and achieves the probate-avoidance goals.
Retirement accounts and many life insurance policies have their own rules and tax consequences, and they often pass to named beneficiaries rather than by assignment to a trust. In some cases, the trust can be designated as the beneficiary of a retirement account or life insurance policy, but doing so has tax and administrative implications that should be carefully considered. Transferring ownership by assignment is not always possible for these accounts, and the correct method is usually through beneficiary designation forms or a qualified beneficiary trust arrangement. If a trust is named as the beneficiary, it is important to ensure the trust language and structure are appropriate for receiving such assets, particularly retirement accounts, because distributions may be subject to income tax and specific payout rules. Coordination between trust provisions and account custodians is necessary to manage tax outcomes and distribution options, and professional guidance will help determine the best approach for each account type.
Yes, deeds for real property generally must be recorded to effect a change in ownership from an individual to a trust. A general assignment alone may not be sufficient to change the public record for real estate, and recording a new deed conveying the property into the trust is the standard method. Recording ensures that title records reflect the trust’s interest and provides clarity for future transactions, financing, or administration by a trustee. The deed should reference the correct trust name and date and be prepared to meet county recording requirements. Recording deeds should be done with attention to potential transfer taxes, mortgage lender requirements, and any restrictions that may affect conveyance. It is advisable to confirm requirements with the county recorder and, if there is a mortgage on the property, notify the lender. Properly recorded deeds ensure the trust has recognized ownership and prevent administrative complications during trust administration or sale of the property.
A pour-over will directs any assets remaining in an individual’s name at death to the trust, acting as a safety net for items not previously funded into the trust. While a pour-over will helps ensure that intended assets ultimately fall into the trust for distribution under trust terms, assets passing under a will are typically subject to probate before they can be transferred to the trust. Therefore, relying solely on a pour-over will can result in probate for those assets unless other nonprobate mechanisms were used beforehand. Using a pour-over will alongside active trust funding, including assignments and retitling where necessary, creates a layered plan that minimizes the risk of probate while providing a fallback for inadvertent omissions. The goal is to fund the trust as fully as practical during life, while keeping the pour-over will as a protective measure to capture any remaining assets and maintain alignment with the grantor’s plan.
If a bank or broker will not accept the trust as owner after an assignment, it may be due to institution-specific procedures, missing documentation, or internal policy requirements. In such cases, follow-up is required to determine the precise deficiency, which might include a need for a certified copy of the trust, a certificate of trust, identification of trustees, or additional forms requested by the institution. Working directly with the institution to clarify requirements often resolves the issue and allows retitling or beneficiary updates to be completed. If problems persist, alternative solutions include preparing specific retitling documents, providing clearer supporting trust documentation, or exploring other mechanisms such as payable-on-death designations. Persistent institutional resistance should be addressed through documented communication and, if necessary, additional legal steps to ensure the trust receives the intended assets. Clear records and patient coordination typically resolve most acceptance issues.
It is prudent to review your trust funding and assignments periodically and after major life events. Recommended review times include after marriage or divorce, birth or adoption of children, significant changes in asset holdings, relocation, or receipt of an inheritance. Regular reviews ensure that beneficiary designations, account titles, and deeds remain aligned with the trust and grantor intentions. An annual or biennial check-up helps catch changes in institutional forms or state laws that may affect your plan. During reviews, update records and execute any necessary retitling or beneficiary changes to maintain the effectiveness of the trust. Keeping an updated asset inventory and copies of executed assignments saves time and reduces confusion for trustees and family members. Regular reviews preserve the benefits of trust funding and support smooth administration when the plan needs to be implemented.
A general assignment can be used as a temporary measure to place assets into a trust during transitions, such as when a trust is newly created or when permanent retitling is delayed due to logistics or ongoing transactions. As a temporary step, an assignment can document intent and provide a bridge while long-term retitling is completed. However, treating an assignment as temporary requires clear records and an action plan to complete permanent transfers when feasible to avoid confusion and institutional issues later on. When using an assignment temporarily, follow up to ensure permanent changes occur, such as recording deeds or updating account titles and beneficiary forms. A temporary assignment should be clearly dated and documented, and clients should maintain records of subsequent actions to confirm that the trust ultimately holds the assets in the manner intended. Long-term reliance on temporary measures increases the risk of assets remaining outside the trust.
After completing assignments and funding the trust, successor trustees should receive a complete file containing executed trust documents, assignments, deeds, certificates of trust, and a detailed asset inventory with account numbers and contact information for financial institutions. Also include any powers of attorney, health care directives, and information about insurance and retirement accounts. Providing trustees with a clear, organized packet reduces delays and confusion when administration is needed and helps them locate important documents quickly. It is also helpful to provide instructions on where originals are stored, a list of passwords or access instructions for online accounts if appropriate, and contact information for professionals who assisted with the plan. Keeping these records in a secure but accessible place and informing successor trustees of their location promotes efficient administration and honors the grantor’s intentions without unnecessary burden on family members.
Beneficiary designations often take precedence for accounts like life insurance and retirement plans, so they can supersede trust assignment if not updated. When planning to have such assets administered by the trust, it is important to update beneficiary designations to name the trust where appropriate or structure the trust to receive the asset in a tax- and administratively-appropriate manner. Failure to coordinate designations and assignments can result in assets passing outside the trust despite other funding efforts. For certain accounts, naming the trust as beneficiary may have tax or distribution consequences and should be considered carefully. Coordination between the trust terms and account custodian requirements is necessary to ensure the chosen approach aligns with overall objectives. Clear documentation and periodic checks of beneficiary forms help maintain consistency between account designations and trust planning.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas