If you are considering changes to a trust that controls assets for you or a loved one, a trust modification petition can be an effective legal tool. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist California residents in Koreatown and throughout Los Angeles County with evaluating whether a petition to modify or reform an existing trust is appropriate based on changed circumstances, drafting the necessary pleadings, and guiding clients through court procedures when needed. Trust modifications can address errors, changed relationships, tax considerations, or shifts in financial situations while striving to preserve the grantor’s intent and beneficiaries’ rights.
Trust modification involves legal and factual analysis to determine whether the current trust document can be changed through agreement of interested parties or whether a court petition is necessary. Whether the goal is to correct a drafting mistake, accommodate a beneficiary’s disability, update fiduciary appointments, or respond to new tax laws, the process requires careful planning to avoid unintended consequences. Our approach is focused on thorough document review, clear explanations of options, and practical steps to pursue amendment, reformation, or modification while minimizing disruptions to estate plans and family relationships.
A trust modification petition can bring clarity and fairness to an estate plan when circumstances change or when the original document does not reflect current intentions. Modifying a trust can correct administrative problems, resolve ambiguities, update fiduciary appointments, protect beneficiaries’ public benefits, or address tax planning adjustments. Pursuing a modification through agreement is often less intrusive, but a court petition can be required when parties disagree or when legal doctrines like reformation or decanting are involved. The primary benefit is aligning the trust with the grantor’s present wishes while preserving the integrity of asset transfers and beneficiary protections.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients in Koreatown and across Los Angeles County with estate planning and trust administration matters. Our lawyers handle revocable and irrevocable trust issues, draft amendments, and represent clients in trust modification petitions when necessary. We emphasize practical solutions tailored to family dynamics, tax and asset preservation goals, and the need for clear legal documentation. Clients receive personalized attention from attorneys who review documents in detail, discuss alternatives, and explain likely outcomes under California law so that families can make informed decisions about modifying trust arrangements.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that seeks to modify, reform, or terminate an existing trust when parties cannot accomplish the change informally or when legal grounds require judicial approval. California law provides routes for amendment by consent, reformation to correct mistakes, or modification where changed circumstances make the original terms impracticable or contrary to the grantor’s intent. The process typically begins with a careful review of the trust instrument, identification of interested parties, and analysis of statutory and case law to determine the viable legal arguments and the likely procedural path through probate or superior court.
Before filing a petition, it is often possible to negotiate an agreement among the grantor and beneficiaries to amend or restate the trust without court intervention. When agreement cannot be reached, a petition can seek reformation to correct scrivener’s errors, equitable modification to reflect the grantor’s true intent, or termination for impracticability. Each path requires specific factual proof, supporting documents, and careful drafting. The process may involve hearings, evidence, and potential objections, so thorough preparation and clear explanation of objectives help manage timelines and costs for clients pursuing trust changes.
A trust modification petition asks the court to alter the legal effect of an existing trust document for reasons that can include mistake, changed circumstances, ambiguity, or the need to protect beneficiaries’ interests. The petition may request reformation to correct an error, clarification where language is uncertain, or modification to address changes that make terms impracticable. Petitions can also address the transfer of assets, appointment of a new trustee, or preservation of public benefits for a beneficiary. The goal is to maintain the grantor’s original intent while adapting the trust to present realities and legal requirements.
Successful trust modification begins with identifying the grantor’s intent and gathering all relevant trust documents, amendments, and related estate planning instruments. Next comes an assessment of interested parties and potential objections, followed by consideration of alternatives such as nonjudicial amendment or mediation. If a court petition is required, the attorney prepares pleadings that present evidence of mistake, changed circumstances, or other grounds recognized by California law. The process may include notice to beneficiaries, discovery, hearings, and a court order that formalizes the modification or reformation of the trust.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. This glossary explains words such as grantor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, decanting, and modification petition. Clear definitions help demystify court procedures, the roles of parties, and the legal standards used to evaluate requests to change trust terms. Familiarity with these terms also makes it easier to provide required evidence and to communicate effectively with counsel throughout the petition process.
The grantor, sometimes called the settlor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The grantor’s intent is central to trust modification matters because courts often seek to honor that original intent when considering petitions to reform or amend trust terms. In modification proceedings, evidence such as correspondence, earlier drafts, and contemporaneous statements can help demonstrate what the grantor intended, which may support a petition to correct mistakes or adjust terms to reflect present circumstances without undermining the trust’s fundamental objectives.
Reformation is a judicial remedy that changes the language of a trust to correct mistakes or to reflect the true intent of the grantor when the written document does not accurately express that intent. Courts consider extrinsic evidence to determine whether a scrivener’s error or mutual mistake occurred. A successful reformation aligns the trust language with the grantor’s actual wishes while preserving the document’s legal integrity. Reformation is typically pursued when amendment by parties is impossible or when the mistake is undisputed but cannot be fixed without court action.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for beneficiaries. Trustees owe fiduciary duties such as loyalty, prudence, impartiality among beneficiaries, and proper record-keeping. In modification proceedings, issues may arise regarding a trustee’s authority to amend or interpret trust provisions, or whether a trustee breached duties that justify court intervention. Courts may consider whether a trustee acted within the scope of authority and whether modification is necessary to correct administrative or fiduciary problems.
Modification changes the terms of a trust while keeping the trust in effect, whereas termination ends the trust and distributes assets according to the trust’s provisions or the parties’ agreement. Termination may be appropriate when the trust’s purpose has been fulfilled or when continued administration is impractical. Modification is more common when the trust requires adjustment for reasons such as tax planning, beneficiary needs, or corrections to drafting errors. Both options may require court approval when beneficiaries or parties disagree or when legal standards demand judicial oversight.
When considering changes to a trust, parties can often pursue informal amendment if the trust authorizes it and all interested parties agree. Reformation addresses mistakes in drafting, typically requiring a showing of the grantor’s true intent and evidence of error. A court petition for modification covers a broader range of relief, including changes based on changed circumstances or impracticability. Each route has trade-offs regarding cost, time, evidentiary requirements, and the degree of court involvement, so selecting the right approach depends on the trust language, the willingness of parties to agree, and the legal grounds available under California law.
If all interested parties, including the grantor and beneficiaries, agree on the proposed change, an informal amendment or restatement can often achieve the desired result without court intervention. This path minimizes legal fees and avoids the delays associated with court proceedings. To proceed safely, parties should document the agreement in writing, ensure compliance with the trust’s amendment provisions, and confirm that the change does not jeopardize tax planning or third-party rights. Having clear, signed documentation reduces the risk of future disputes and preserves a consistent record of intent.
Minor administrative errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect dates that do not affect substantive distribution terms, can often be corrected through a straightforward amendment or trustee action if the trust allows it. When the change is purely clerical and all interested parties concur, court action may be unnecessary. It remains important to document the correction formally and to ensure the trustee’s actions comply with fiduciary duties. Proper documentation helps prevent later challenges and maintains the trust’s reliability for asset administration.
When beneficiaries disagree about the meaning or application of trust provisions, or when the trust contains ambiguous language that cannot be reconciled by informal agreement, a court petition may be necessary to achieve a binding resolution. Courts evaluate evidence to determine the grantor’s intent and may issue orders that clarify, reform, or modify the trust to reflect that intent. Representation in these proceedings helps ensure that filings are properly supported by evidence, notices are provided to required parties, and hearings are prepared for with persuasive factual and legal arguments.
When drafting errors or outdated provisions could lead to significant distribution changes, tax liabilities, or unintended disinheritance, a court-supervised modification can protect the financial interests of beneficiaries and the grantor’s estate plan. Complex cases may require forensic review of documents, testimony, and expert input on tax or trust administration issues. In such circumstances, the additional cost and formality of a petition are often justified by the need for a definitive legal remedy that prevents costly disputes or unanticipated tax exposure in the future.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines thorough document review, careful fact-gathering, and strategic planning to produce durable results. By evaluating the trust in light of current family, financial and tax circumstances, attorneys can identify the most effective path—whether informal amendment, reformation, or a court petition. This method reduces the likelihood of future disputes, anticipates potential objections, and ensures that modifications are legally sound. The end result is a trust that better reflects the grantor’s present intentions and provides clearer guidance for trustees and beneficiaries.
Comprehensive planning also addresses related documents such as wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives to ensure consistent estate planning across instruments. When modifications are coordinated with tax planning and beneficiary needs, the adjusted trust supports long-term goals like asset protection, benefit eligibility, or efficient administration. This holistic review prevents unintended consequences from isolated changes and creates a cohesive estate plan that can be implemented more smoothly by trustees and family members when circumstances require action.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is achieving clarity and legal finality in trust documents. Clear language and court-approved modifications reduce the risk of interpretation disputes and litigation among beneficiaries. When changes are properly documented and, where necessary, ratified by the court, trustees have confident authority to administer assets as directed. This stability is especially valuable for families with complex assets, blended-family arrangements, or beneficiaries with special needs because it minimizes administrative uncertainty and potential conflicts during sensitive times.
A well-planned modification ensures beneficiary protections remain in place while adapting to changing needs. Whether the goal is to protect a disabled beneficiary’s public benefits, adjust distributions for changing financial circumstances, or update trustee duties, a deliberate approach tailors the trust to safeguard interests. Properly executed modifications can preserve eligibility for government programs, improve asset management, and reduce the potential for future disputes, giving families peace of mind that the trust will operate as intended when it matters most.
Start by assembling all versions of the trust document, amendments, prior wills, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence or drafts that shed light on the grantor’s intent. Documentation that shows the evolution of the estate plan can be invaluable when presenting evidence to support a petition. Financial statements, tax records, and proof of asset transfers also help clarify how the trust was funded. A complete record speeds evaluation, reduces surprises during discovery, and strengthens the foundation for either negotiated modifications or court pleadings.
Before making modifications, evaluate long-term tax implications, beneficiary needs, and the potential effect on other estate planning documents like wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. An isolated change to a trust without coordinating related instruments can create inconsistencies or unintended tax consequences. Reviewing the broader estate plan ensures that any modification supports overall goals, maintains benefit eligibility where needed, and provides cohesive instructions for trustees and family members during future administrations of the trust.
Clients may consider a trust modification petition when the existing trust no longer reflects the grantor’s intentions, contains drafting errors, or is impractical to administer under current circumstances. Examples include changes in family structure, newly discovered mistakes in trust language, changed tax laws that affect distribution planning, or a trustee’s inability to carry out duties. A petition gives the court the authority to reform or modify the trust to protect the grantor’s goals and beneficiaries’ interests when other remedies are unavailable or insufficient.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when a beneficiary’s circumstances require special protection, such as preserving eligibility for public benefits or accommodating a disability through tailored distribution terms. Additionally, when trustees disagree about authority to interpret or amend terms, a court’s ruling can provide binding clarity. Pursuing a petition is a serious step that should follow a careful review of alternatives, but it can deliver legally enforceable changes that reduce uncertainty and prevent future litigation among family members.
Typical situations prompting modification petitions include ambiguous trust provisions, scrivener’s errors that materially alter distributions, changes in beneficiary needs, the death or incapacity of a named trustee, and tax law developments. Other circumstances are when the trust’s purpose has been frustrated, assets cannot be effectively administered under existing terms, or when a trust omits important successor trustee mechanisms. Each fact pattern requires careful legal assessment to determine whether amendment by agreement or a court petition is the most effective means of achieving the desired result.
Ambiguities in trust language or drafting errors can create uncertainty about beneficiaries’ rights or trustee duties, and such issues often lead to petitions to reform the document. Evidence like earlier drafts, correspondence, or the grantor’s instructions can support a petition for reformation to reflect the true intent. Correcting these kinds of errors helps ensure distributions align with what the grantor meant to achieve, reduces administrative disputes, and provides trustees with clear direction for asset management and distribution.
Life changes such as remarriage, the birth of a child, divorce, or major shifts in financial circumstances can render trust provisions outdated or detrimental to intended beneficiaries. In these situations, modification can better reflect current family dynamics and financial realities. Addressing these changes proactively through amendment or petition helps avoid future conflicts and ensures that the trust continues to align with the grantor’s most recent intentions and priorities for asset distribution and protection.
When a beneficiary’s eligibility for public benefits could be affected by trust distributions, modification can establish protective provisions such as special needs trust language or spendthrift terms to preserve benefits. Modifications may also tailor distributions to provide long-term care or management for incapacitated beneficiaries. Courts can authorize changes that help maintain benefit eligibility or appoint fiduciaries to manage funds on behalf of those unable to handle finances, supporting the beneficiary’s needs while honoring the grantor’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local representation for Koreatown and Los Angeles County residents who need guidance on modifying trusts. We assist with evaluating your trust documents, advising on nonjudicial amendment options, preparing petitions for reformation or modification, and representing clients in court if necessary. Our office understands California trust law and the procedural requirements in local courts, and we work to provide practical, straightforward counsel to help clients pursue changes that align with their current goals and family needs.
At our firm, clients receive focused attention to the factual and legal issues that affect their trust plans. We begin with a detailed review of the trust and related estate documents, identify the most viable procedural options, and outline likely outcomes and costs. Our goal is to provide clear guidance that enables informed decision-making and to pursue modifications that reduce future dispute risk and ensure dependable administration of assets according to the grantor’s intent.
We guide clients through both negotiated resolutions and court proceedings, preparing thorough petitions and supporting evidence when judicial approval is required. Communication is a priority, and clients are kept informed about timelines, necessary disclosures, and potential obstacles. This careful preparation helps streamline hearings and reduces surprises, making the process more manageable for families during what can be a stressful time.
Our approach also includes coordinating trust modifications with related estate planning documents and financial considerations to avoid unintended consequences. Whether the matter involves updating trustees, correcting drafting errors, or protecting beneficiaries with disabilities, we pursue solutions that reflect the client’s present goals and provide durable, legally defensible results that help secure family and financial interests over the long term.
Our process begins with a consultation to review the trust and explain options for amendment, reformation, or court petition. We collect relevant documents, identify interested parties, and evaluate the strength of the legal grounds for modification. If an out-of-court resolution is feasible, we assist in negotiating and documenting the changes. When a petition is necessary, we prepare pleadings, handle service and notice to beneficiaries, manage discovery, and represent clients at hearings to seek a judicial order authorizing the requested modification.
The initial step involves a comprehensive review of the trust, amendments, related estate planning documents, and any correspondence or drafts that illuminate the grantor’s intent. We also identify trustees, beneficiaries, and any potential claimants. This assessment determines whether an informal amendment is possible or whether grounds exist for reformation or court-ordered modification. The findings shape the strategy, required evidence, timelines, and estimated costs, allowing clients to make informed decisions about moving forward.
We gather all documents that may bear on the trust’s meaning or funding, such as earlier drafts, emails, signed letters, and financial records. Evidence that shows the grantor’s intent or supports a claim of mistake is assembled and analyzed to determine its admissibility and persuasive value. This forensic review helps build a factual record for a petition or negotiation, and it identifies any holes in the documentation that might need supplementation through discovery or witness statements.
We create a list of all interested parties, including beneficiaries, trustees, and potential creditors, and assess their likely positions and legal interests. Early identification of potential conflicts allows us to plan for notice requirements and to anticipate objections that might arise during the petition process. Understanding these dynamics helps shape settlement talks or litigation strategy and ensures that notices and pleadings comply with procedural requirements to avoid delays or challenges to the court’s jurisdiction.
Based on the assessment, we pursue the most effective path forward. If parties are willing, we draft and negotiate an amendment or settlement that documents the agreed changes. If court action is necessary, we prepare a thorough petition with supporting declarations and exhibits, ensure proper service on all interested parties, and file with the appropriate court. Our filings focus on presenting clear factual evidence and legal arguments to support the requested modification or reformation under California law.
When an out-of-court resolution is feasible, we draft a formal amendment or restatement that accurately reflects the agreed changes and complies with the trust’s amendment procedures. We help clients document the agreement with clear language, execute the necessary signatures, and update related documents to maintain consistency. This nonjudicial route saves time and expense but requires careful drafting to ensure the change is durable and does not create inconsistencies with other estate planning instruments.
When a petition is required, we prepare the complaint or petition, supporting declarations, and documentary evidence, and handle service and notice to all required parties. We respond to discovery requests, argue motions as necessary, and prepare clients and witnesses for hearings. The goal is to present a clear narrative supported by admissible evidence that persuades the court to grant modification, reformation, or other relief sought while minimizing procedural delays and addressing objections effectively.
If the court grants the petition, we assist with implementing the court’s order, which may include revising trust documents, transferring assets, updating beneficiary designations, or instructing trustees on new duties. If the petition is denied, we advise clients on appellate options or alternative strategies. Implementation also involves notifying financial institutions and title holders of changes and ensuring the updated trust terms are enforced in administration going forward, reducing the likelihood of future disputes.
After a favorable order, we prepare updated trust documents and coordinate asset retitling, beneficiary designations, and communications to trustees and beneficiaries. We provide written instructions for trustees regarding the new terms and ensure financial institutions accept the revised documents. Proper implementation prevents administrative errors and ensures that the trust operates according to the court’s directives, providing beneficiaries and fiduciaries with the clarity needed to administer assets and carry out distributions without further conflict.
We advise clients on steps to minimize the risk of future disputes, such as documenting the rationale for changes, obtaining releases where appropriate, and aligning related estate planning instruments. Where beneficiaries are concerned, we facilitate clear communication about the order and the revised administration plan. For clients who face potential challenges after the order, we outline options for enforcement or defense and help establish practices that reduce the chance of renewed litigation or confusion over trust terms.
Grounds for filing a trust modification petition include drafting errors that do not reflect the grantor’s intent, changed circumstances that render the trust impracticable, ambiguity in key provisions, or situations where a court order is required to effectuate changes to protect beneficiaries. Courts may grant reformation when extrinsic evidence demonstrates that the written instrument fails to express the grantor’s actual intention. Similarly, modification can address unexpected tax consequences or fiduciary issues when nonjudicial solutions are not viable. Selecting the appropriate legal theory requires careful factual review and documentary evidence. Petitioners must identify interested parties, establish standing, and present admissible evidence to support the requested relief. Because courts analyze the grantor’s intent and the specific statutory framework, preparation involves assembling drafts, correspondence, and testimony that corroborate the asserted grounds for modification to persuade the court to issue an order.
If beneficiaries disagree, out-of-court modification becomes more difficult but not always impossible. Parties can engage in negotiation or mediation to reach a settlement that amends the trust, which can be a quicker and less expensive path if everyone consents. Even when some parties object, a subset of interested parties might have authority under the trust’s terms or applicable statutes to effect certain changes without full judicial involvement. However, where objections cannot be resolved or where the trust language or legal grounds require judicial action, a petition may be necessary to obtain binding relief. In such circumstances, court proceedings provide a definitive resolution that protects the interests of all parties and establishes a clear legal basis for the modification.
Timelines for trust modification petitions vary based on case complexity, the court’s calendar, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions supported by clear documentary evidence and lacking substantial objections may resolve in a matter of months, while contested proceedings involving discovery, witness testimony, or multiple hearings can extend longer. Local court procedures and backlog can also affect timing, so it’s important to factor in potential delays when planning modifications. Early case assessment, thorough preparation of pleadings, and proactive resolution efforts such as mediation can shorten the timeline. Clients should expect initial document gathering and case evaluation to take several weeks, followed by formal filing, service, and scheduling of hearings according to the court’s procedures, with counsel providing regular updates about anticipated milestones.
Modifying a trust can affect a beneficiary’s eligibility for public benefits, depending on the nature of the change and how distributions are structured. To preserve eligibility for programs like Medi-Cal or Supplemental Security Income, modifications can include protective mechanisms such as special needs trust provisions, discretionary distribution standards, or spendthrift language to prevent direct distributions that might disqualify benefits. Proper planning is essential to balance access to trust resources with eligibility requirements for public assistance. Before pursuing changes that could impact benefits, it is important to analyze the beneficiary’s situation and to design modifications that protect benefits while providing for supplemental needs. Coordination with counsel who understands public benefits rules and trust drafting techniques helps ensure that modifications achieve the intended support without inadvertently causing loss of critical programs or creating exposure to recoveries by government agencies.
Evidence supporting a reformation petition may include earlier drafts of the trust, email or written communications reflecting the grantor’s instructions, contemporaneous notes, witness testimony, and financial records that show the intent behind particular provisions. Courts often look for a consistent pattern of documentary evidence that demonstrates the grantor’s actual intent and the existence of a drafting mistake or mutual misunderstanding. A strong evidentiary record increases the likelihood of convincing the court to correct the written document. Documentation that shows the grantor’s statements about the distribution plan, reasons for selecting certain beneficiaries, or instructions given to counsel or staff can be particularly persuasive. When direct documentary evidence is limited, testimonial evidence from those who interacted with the grantor during the drafting process can help fill gaps, though courts weigh such evidence carefully against the plain language of the trust instrument.
Whether a trustee can unilaterally modify a trust depends on the trust terms and California law. Some trusts grant trustees limited amendment authority for administrative or tax reasons, while others require consent from beneficiaries or court approval for substantive changes. Trustees must act within their fiduciary powers and in the trust’s and beneficiaries’ best interests; any action outside those powers may be subject to challenge by beneficiaries. When trustee authority is unclear or contested, seeking judicial clarification or approval often provides the most secure path forward. A court can authorize a trustee’s action or direct specific modifications to ensure they are legally valid and enforceable, reducing the risk of later disputes or claims of breach of duty against the trustee.
Creditors and third-party interests are considered in modification proceedings depending on the trust’s terms and the nature of the relief sought. Notice requirements may obligate notifying creditors, contingent interest holders, or others whose rights might be affected by the modification. Courts balance these interests when determining whether to permit changes that could prejudice third parties, and sometimes conditions are imposed to protect those interests while allowing necessary modifications. Where creditor claims are a concern, counsel may propose arrangements that satisfy or protect claimants before seeking modification. Proper notice and, if necessary, addressing claims in the petition or settlement agreements helps avoid post-order challenges and ensures the trust modification remains effective without exposing the estate or beneficiaries to additional liability.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating an amendment among interested parties, using trustee amendment powers where authorized, or pursuing mediation to resolve conflicts. Out-of-court solutions can be quicker, less expensive, and more private than litigation. A formal amendment or restatement executed by the necessary parties can often accomplish the desired change if parties are cooperative and the trust’s terms allow it. When parties cannot agree, exploring structured negotiation, neutral evaluation, or mediation may narrow issues and lead to partial agreements that reduce the scope of any required litigation. These alternative dispute resolution approaches preserve relationships and can produce durable solutions without the cost and publicity of court proceedings when they succeed.
Costs for trust modification petitions depend on complexity, the need for discovery, expert testimony, and whether the matter is contested. Simple amendments or negotiated agreements tend to be far less costly than contested litigation. When a petition is necessary, legal fees and court costs may escalate with the number of parties, the volume of evidence, and the number of hearings required. Counsel should provide an estimate after reviewing the trust and the facts, outlining anticipated tasks and likely ranges of cost for different scenarios. Clients should weigh the potential benefits of a successful modification against the expected costs and timelines. In many cases, careful pre-filing investigation and strategic negotiation reduce litigation time and expense. Discussing fee structures, possible phased approaches, and alternatives with attorneys helps set realistic expectations and budget for the process.
For an initial consultation about modifying a trust, bring the most recent trust document, any amendments or restatements, related wills, powers of attorney, health directives, and any correspondence or drafts related to the trust’s drafting. Financial statements, deeds, account statements showing trust funding, and letters that reflect the grantor’s intentions are also helpful. Providing as complete a record as possible enables a more accurate assessment of options and likely outcomes. In the meeting, be prepared to explain the reasons for seeking modification, identify potential interested parties, and describe any disputes or concerns among beneficiaries or trustees. This background helps counsel evaluate whether an out-of-court amendment is feasible or whether a petition may be required, and provides the basis for a recommended plan of action and cost estimate.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas