A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to validate and access assets that were intended to be part of a trust but remain titled in an individual name after a grantor passes away. In La Crescenta-Montrose and throughout California, these petitions help trustees and beneficiaries carry out the decedent’s estate plan without unnecessary delay. The petition asks the court to confirm that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust and permits transfer of those assets into trust administration. This process can prevent long delays and provide a clear legal path to achieve the trust’s objectives for beneficiaries and trustees.
When an asset remains titled in the deceased person’s name, beneficiaries and trustees may face obstacles in administering the trust. A Heggstad petition documents the trust’s intent and requests court approval to treat the asset as trust property. The procedure offers a streamlined way to resolve title discrepancies while preserving the settlor’s wishes as expressed in the trust instruments. Handling a Heggstad petition carefully reduces the chance of later disputes, supports smooth asset transfer, and provides beneficiaries with clarity about ownership and distribution under the trust terms and California law governing trusts and estates.
A Heggstad petition serves as a practical remedy when a trust asset remains improperly titled or when documentation is lacking to show an asset was meant to be in trust. It brings legal recognition that the asset belongs to the trust, enabling trustees to administer and distribute assets as intended. For beneficiaries, the petition minimizes delays and legal uncertainty while facilitating access to trust property without full probate in some situations. Courts evaluate the documentary evidence and circumstances to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property, so presenting a well-prepared petition can simplify resolution and protect the estate plan’s integrity.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with trust administration matters across California, including preparation and filing of Heggstad petitions. Our approach focuses on careful review of trust documents, asset records, and title information to support a clear legal argument to the court. We guide trustees and beneficiaries through each procedural step, advising on documentation and court filings while maintaining attention to client goals and timelines. Whether resolving a single asset issue or coordinating transfers for a larger estate, we prioritize practical solutions that uphold the decedent’s intent and make trust administration more predictable and efficient.
A Heggstad petition is used to establish that certain property should be treated as owned by a trust despite being titled in an individual’s name. This can happen when the settlor intended to fund the trust but did not complete title transfers, or when documents like a certification of trust and pour-over will indicate the settlor’s intent. The petition asks the probate or superior court to recognize the trust’s interest and authorize appropriate transfers. Outcomes depend on the quality of documentation and evidence presented, so thorough record review and accurate pleadings are essential to support a favorable decision.
The common situations prompting a Heggstad petition include bank or investment accounts, real estate, vehicles, or other assets still in the decedent’s name. The petition must demonstrate that the decedent intended those assets to be trust property, often through trust terms, transfer paperwork, beneficiary designations, and related correspondence. The court may grant orders correcting title or authorizing the trustee to manage the asset on behalf of the trust. Understanding local court procedures and evidentiary expectations helps trustees and beneficiaries avoid delays and provides a secure path to complete trust administration.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court to establish that certain assets are trust property even though they remain titled in the decedent’s name. It derives from a California appellate decision and is commonly used to correct title discrepancies without full probate administration of the estate. The petition presents trust documents, affidavits, and other evidence showing the decedent intended the assets to be part of the trust. If the court is satisfied, it can issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest, allowing the trustee to manage or transfer the assets according to the trust terms and facilitating efficient distribution to beneficiaries.
A successful Heggstad petition typically relies on clear trust documentation, consistent evidence that the settlor intended to fund the trust, and records showing the asset was meant to be controlled by the trustee. Supporting materials include the trust instrument, any certification of trust, pour-over wills, bank statements, transfer forms, and correspondence reflecting intent. The process involves preparing the petition, filing with the appropriate court, serving interested parties as required, and responding to any objections. Meticulous assembly of evidence and precise legal pleadings increase the likelihood that the court will recognize the trust’s interest and authorize corrective action.
Understanding the terminology used in trust administration and Heggstad petitions helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, pour-over will, certification of trust, and title record all play a role in showing intent and ownership. Knowing what documentation courts expect and how those items support a petition reduces uncertainty. Familiarity with these terms empowers clients to gather necessary records, communicate effectively about estate assets, and work with counsel to prepare a petition that addresses the court’s requirements and aligns with the settlor’s documented wishes.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and placed assets into it or intended to do so during their lifetime. In the Heggstad petition context, establishing the settlor’s intent is critical to show that assets remaining in the decedent’s name were meant to be held by the trust. Evidence of intent can include the trust document itself, funding records, and communications or financial instructions demonstrating the settlor’s plan. Accurate identification of the settlor and clear documentation of their wishes supports the court’s consideration of the petition and the trustee’s authority to manage those assets for beneficiaries.
The trustee is the individual or entity appointed by the trust instrument to manage trust assets and carry out the settlor’s directions. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee typically petitions the court to confirm that certain assets belong to the trust and to obtain authority to transfer or administer them. The trustee is responsible for presenting evidence of intent and for following the court’s orders regarding asset management. The trustee’s duties include acting in the beneficiaries’ interests, maintaining accurate records, and ensuring transfers comply with the trust terms and California law.
A beneficiary is a person or entity named in the trust who is entitled to receive distributions from trust assets according to the trust terms. Beneficiaries may be affected when assets remain in the decedent’s name because access and distribution can be delayed or contested. A Heggstad petition helps clarify ownership and supports timely administration for beneficiaries. Beneficiaries may receive notice of the petition and have opportunities to respond. Clear demonstration of the settlor’s intent and proper court orders can protect beneficiaries’ interests and enable distributions consistent with the trust’s provisions.
A certification of trust is a condensed version of the trust document that confirms the existence and key terms of the trust without revealing private provisions. It is often used to show third parties, like banks or title companies, that the trustee has authority to manage or transfer assets. In Heggstad petition matters, a certification of trust can be important supporting evidence that the trust exists and that the settlor intended certain assets to be part of it. Providing a certification along with other records strengthens the petition and may streamline the court’s recognition of trust ownership.
When assets remain improperly titled, several legal paths are available. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that the assets belong to the trust, while full probate administration may be necessary when clear title issues or creditor claims require estate court supervision. Informal resolution with financial institutions or title companies may work for some accounts or property, but where documentary evidence is inconsistent, the petition provides a formal legal remedy. Choosing the right route depends on the asset type, documentation, potential disputes, and the parties’ goals. Evaluating the options early helps avoid unnecessary time or cost and protects beneficiary interests.
Some banks, brokers, and title companies have procedural pathways to transfer assets into a trust when documentation is straightforward, such as a certification of trust or completed transfer forms. If the institution accepts the provided records and the asset type does not present legal complications, trustees can accomplish transfers without court involvement. This limited approach is faster and often less costly than filing a petition. It works best when the evidence clearly supports the settlor’s intent and there are no contested beneficiary claims or competing titleholders opposing the transfer.
When assets are low-value or beneficiaries are in agreement about the transfer, informal resolution may suffice. If all interested parties accept the documentation and no creditors or adverse claimants are present, the trustee may transfer or retitle assets by relying on institutional procedures or mutual consent. This approach minimizes court time and filing fees. However, even in uncontested scenarios, maintaining detailed records and obtaining confirmations from institutions is important to prevent later disputes or surprises during final distribution of trust assets.
If title documents are inconsistent or another party asserts ownership, a more thorough legal process may be necessary to resolve competing claims. A Heggstad petition presents evidence to the court supporting trust ownership, and if challenges arise, additional pleadings or hearings may be required to protect the trust and beneficiaries. In these cases, counsel assistance helps prepare a complete record, respond to objections, and present persuasive legal arguments to secure an order that clears title and allows administration to proceed under the trust’s terms.
Complex assets such as real property with liens, retirement accounts with beneficiary complications, or assets involving out-of-state parties may require court resolution to address competing interests and legal encumbrances. When litigation risk exists or when asset transfer affects creditor rights or tax considerations, a carefully drafted petition and comprehensive legal strategy are essential. Courts can issue clear orders resolving complex ownership issues, which protects trustees and beneficiaries from future challenges and ensures that the administration of the trust proceeds in accordance with applicable law.
Filing a Heggstad petition and seeking a court order provides an authoritative resolution to title disputes and confirms the trustee’s authority to handle trust assets. This comprehensive approach reduces the risk of future litigation by creating a record-supported court determination. It helps ensure that transfers are valid under California law and that beneficiaries receive distributions consistent with the settlor’s plan. Although it may involve filing fees and time in court, the long-term benefits of clear legal title and reduced uncertainty often outweigh the initial procedural costs for contested or high-value assets.
A comprehensive approach also promotes thorough documentation and transparency in trust administration. Court involvement generates formal orders and documentation that financial institutions, title companies, and third parties recognize. This can simplify subsequent transactions, clear liens or clouds on title, and provide peace of mind to trustees and beneficiaries. In situations where multiple parties have interests or where third-party cooperation is uncertain, having a court decision makes it easier to complete transfers and distributions while protecting the legal and financial interests of the trust and those entitled to receive its benefits.
A court order recognizing trust ownership gives trustees a defensible basis to retitle assets and distribute proceeds. This clarity reduces the chance of later challenges that could reopen matters and cause delay or expense. By creating a judicially approved record, trustees can show banks, title companies, and potential claimants that transfers were authorized and lawful. For beneficiaries, this helps provide smoother and more predictable access to assets, supporting timely distributions in accordance with the trust terms and minimizing the risk of contested claims down the road.
Courts issue orders that third parties recognize and accept when retitling assets or releasing funds. Banks, brokers, and title companies are more likely to cooperate when there is a judicial determination supporting the trustee’s authority. This acceptance can prevent prolonged negotiation with institutions and reduce administrative friction when completing transfers. For trustees, having an authoritative court order simplifies compliance with financial institutions’ policies and streamlines the final steps of trust administration in a way that informal documentation alone may not achieve.
Collecting all relevant documents before filing a petition saves time and strengthens your case. Start with the trust instrument, any certification of trust, account statements showing intent to fund the trust, pour-over wills, deeds, transfer forms, and any correspondence that supports the settlor’s plan. Detailed records of account titling and transaction histories help demonstrate that the asset was meant to be trust property. Organized documentation makes it easier to prepare a persuasive petition, respond to inquiries, and present evidence to the court, reducing the chance of delays or requests for additional proof.
Evaluate whether a petition is necessary based on asset value, institutional cooperation, and the likelihood of disputes. For straightforward transfers where banks or title companies will accept certification of trust and simple forms, court action may not be needed. However, for high-value assets, contested ownership, or situations involving liens or complex beneficiary issues, a petition provides definitive legal resolution. Balancing time, cost, and risk helps trustees choose an approach that protects the trust and beneficiaries while avoiding unnecessary litigation when informal solutions are feasible.
A Heggstad petition helps clear title clouds and affirms the trustee’s authority to manage assets intended for the trust. When assets are omitted from trust funding due to oversight or administrative error, the petition serves to align legal title with the settlor’s documented intent. This can be particularly important for real property, investment accounts, or other high-value assets where institutional requirements or third-party claims might otherwise delay distributions. Seeking a court order provides a formal resolution that supports efficient trust administration and reduces the risk of later challenges.
Pursuing a petition can also protect trustees by providing clear judicial authorization for transfers and distributions. When financial institutions or title companies demand proof of authority, a court order clarifying ownership and trustee powers can prevent rejections or liability concerns. For beneficiaries, petition resolutions expedite access to trust assets and provide documentary assurance that distributions align with the settlor’s intentions. Overall, the petition is a practical tool for resolving title inconsistencies that might otherwise complicate or prevent completion of the trust’s objectives.
Typical circumstances that prompt a Heggstad petition include assets left in the decedent’s name after death, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled, property deeds not transferred into the trust, missing transfer forms, or conflicting beneficiary designations. Other triggers include out-of-state asset titling, accounts with institutional requirements that cannot be resolved informally, or where heirs disagree about ownership. Identifying these issues early and gathering supporting records helps determine whether a petition is the most appropriate path to correct title and complete administration of the trust assets.
Real estate intended to be part of a trust but left in the decedent’s name often requires formal correction of title. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the property was meant to be trust property, enabling the trustee to record a deed transferring the property into the trust or otherwise manage it according to the trust terms. This is a common scenario because property transfers require careful documentation and sometimes are overlooked during lifetime estate planning. The petition helps ensure the property is administered consistent with the settlor’s intentions.
Accounts that were not retitled into the trust before the settlor’s death can create barriers to administration. Financial institutions may require evidence that the account was intended to be part of the trust. In such cases, a Heggstad petition presents the trust terms and supporting records to the court to establish ownership. Once the court recognizes the trust’s interest, the trustee can request the institution to retitle the account or release funds to the trust to be distributed as directed.
When documentation is inconsistent—such as beneficiary designations that conflict with the trust, outdated transfer forms, or missing funding paperwork—the legal status of assets can be uncertain. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that reconciles those inconsistencies by showing the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. The petition process brings clarity and allows the trustee to resolve title issues under court order, reducing the risk of future disputes and enabling faithful administration of the trust according to the settlor’s instructions.
If you are dealing with trust assets that remain in the decedent’s name in La Crescenta-Montrose, we can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and guide you through the process. We work with trustees and beneficiaries to collect necessary documentation, prepare a persuasive petition, and handle court filings. Our goal is to provide clear next steps, manage communications with interested parties, and pursue a timely resolution that aligns with the settlor’s intent and California law. Starting early and documenting evidence thoroughly improves the potential for a favorable outcome.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on estate planning and trust administration services, including preparation and prosecution of Heggstad petitions. We place emphasis on careful document review, clear client communication, and thoughtful presentation of evidence to the court. Our process begins with collecting trust instruments and asset records, assessing the strength of the documentation, and outlining realistic options tailored to your situation. We work to reduce surprises, clarify timelines, and provide practical guidance to trustees and beneficiaries facing title discrepancies.
We assist clients in assembling the necessary paperwork and preparing court filings required for a Heggstad petition, including certifications of trust, affidavits, and supporting records that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. When interested parties must be notified or served, we coordinate those notifications and handle the procedural requirements. Throughout the matter, our goal is to maintain transparency about likely outcomes and to pursue a resolution that minimizes cost and delay while addressing title issues comprehensively under California law.
Clients receive guidance on alternatives to court filing when appropriate, such as institutional retitling or administrative transfers, and clear advice when court action is the most reliable route. For contested matters, we help prepare responses and evidentiary submissions to address objections and support a court order. Our communication focuses on practical steps to protect beneficiaries’ rights and to ensure that trust administration proceeds in a way that honors the settlor’s intentions and reduces the likelihood of future disputes.
Our process begins with an intake to identify the asset, review the trust instrument, and collect supporting records. We evaluate whether institutional remedies are available or whether a petition is the proper route. If filing is recommended, we draft the petition, assemble exhibits, prepare required notices, and file with the appropriate court. We handle communications with interested parties and represent the trustee through any hearings. After a court order is obtained, we assist with retitling, recording deeds, and completing necessary transfers to effectuate the trust’s terms and allow distributions to beneficiaries.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust document, transfer records, account statements, and any correspondence relevant to the asset’s intended ownership. We identify gaps, conflicting documents, or institutional hurdles that could affect the process. This assessment determines whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed or whether alternatives are preferable. The goal is to create a strategic plan that details necessary evidence, identifies interested parties, and outlines projected timelines and costs so trustees can make informed decisions about next steps.
Collecting the trust instrument, certification of trust, deeds, account statements, transfer forms, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intention is essential. These documents build the factual foundation showing that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. We help clients locate records and request information from institutions when necessary. A complete evidentiary package increases the likelihood of court acceptance and reduces the chance of additional discovery or requests for supplemental documentation during the petition process.
Before filing a petition, we explore whether banks, title companies, or other institutions will accept the provided documentation to retitle assets without court involvement. When institutions cooperate, this path can save time and expense. If institutional remedies are not available or if third parties dispute ownership, we proceed with petition preparation. Evaluating institutional policies early helps determine whether court action is necessary and clarifies the expected timeline for resolving the title issue.
If filing a Heggstad petition is the best course, we prepare the necessary pleadings, exhibits, and declarations that document the settlor’s intent and the asset’s connection to the trust. The petition is formatted to meet court rules and is filed with the appropriate superior court in California. We also prepare and serve notice to interested parties as required by law. Clear, organized filings increase the chance of efficient court review and reduce the likelihood of procedural objections or requests for additional evidence.
Drafting includes assembling the trust instrument, certification of trust, title documents, and affidavits supporting the settlor’s intent. Declarations from trustees or witnesses describing funding efforts and relevant communications can be persuasive. Exhibits must be labeled and authenticated to meet evidentiary standards. Our preparation focuses on presenting a coherent narrative that ties documents together and supports a court order recognizing trust ownership and authorizing the trustee to retitle or administer the asset.
After filing, legal notice must be provided to beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with court rules. We manage proof of service and monitor court deadlines, responding to any inquiries or objections. If hearings are required, we prepare the record and present arguments to the court. Our involvement ensures procedural requirements are satisfied so the court can consider the merits of the petition without unnecessary delay or procedural defects.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we assist the trustee in retitling assets, recording deeds, and completing financial transfers consistent with the court order. We also help prepare the paperwork that institutions require to accept the order and update records. This stage ensures that the court’s decision translates into practical changes in ownership and allows trustees to continue administering and distributing assets to beneficiaries under the trust terms, closing the loop on a successful petition process.
Implementing the court’s order often requires recording a deed for real property, delivering court-certified documents to financial institutions, and completing retitling forms. We coordinate with title companies and banks to confirm the requirements and complete the steps needed to reflect the trust as owner. Accurate recording and prompt follow-through reduce the risk of administrative setbacks and ensure beneficiaries can receive distributions according to the trust.
After assets are retitled, trustees can proceed with trust administration tasks such as paying debts, resolving creditor claims if any, and distributing assets to beneficiaries in line with the trust provisions. We assist with preparing accounting records, responding to beneficiary inquiries, and ensuring that distributions comply with the trust instrument and court directives. Proper closure of these steps protects trustees and provides beneficiaries with a clear record of how property was handled and distributed.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that seeks a judicial determination that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite being titled in an individual’s name. It is commonly used when a settlor intended to fund a trust but failed to retitle assets before death. The petition provides a way to align legal title with the settlor’s documented intent by presenting the trust document and supporting evidence to the court. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it can issue an order recognizing trust ownership and enabling the trustee to retitle or administer the asset. The petition process requires clear documentary support and careful presentation of facts showing intent to include the asset in the trust. It is used to resolve title discrepancies and reduce the need for full probate administration where appropriate. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, and outcomes depend on the clarity of documentation and whether interested parties contest the petition. Preparing a thorough petition increases the chances of a timely and favorable court decision.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on factors such as the court’s calendar, whether interested parties need to be served, and whether objections are raised. In uncontested matters with prompt handling, the process may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. When hearings or additional discovery are required, the timeline can extend longer. Local court procedures and the complexity of evidentiary issues influence how quickly the matter progresses. Early preparation of complete documentation and timely service on interested parties helps reduce delays. Working closely with counsel to address potential objections and ensure filings meet court requirements also shortens the process. While every case is different, proactive management and clear evidence are key to achieving an efficient resolution.
Courts typically expect the trust instrument, a certification of trust if available, deeds or account statements showing the asset, transfer forms, and any correspondence demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Affidavits or declarations from the trustee or witnesses describing efforts to retitle assets and explaining inconsistencies are commonly submitted. Clear labeling and authentication of exhibits support the court’s review. The more complete and organized the record, the more persuasive the petition will be. Additional documents may include a pour-over will if one exists, prior funding records, beneficiary designations, and bank or brokerage statements. If third-party institutions have specific retitling forms or policies, including that correspondence can clarify why informal retitling was not possible. Preparing a comprehensive evidentiary package helps streamline the court’s decision-making and reduce follow-up requests for supplemental materials.
A trustee may initiate a Heggstad petition, but the process typically requires notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties under probate court rules. Serving interested parties provides them with an opportunity to respond or object, which is a necessary component of due process. Even when beneficiaries are cooperative, proper notice and proof of service are usually required to satisfy court procedures and prevent future challenges to the order. Engaging beneficiaries early and explaining the rationale for filing the petition often reduces the chance of objections. When beneficiaries agree, the matter can proceed more smoothly. However, the trustee must still comply with procedural requirements such as service and filing deadlines to ensure the court will consider the petition and issue a valid order that stands up to later scrutiny.
Filing a Heggstad petition can avoid full probate for the specific assets at issue by obtaining a court order that those assets belong to the trust. However, whether probate is required depends on the overall estate plan, the types of assets, and any claims by creditors or other parties. A Heggstad petition addresses title discrepancies for particular assets rather than replacing all aspects of the probate process. It is a tool aimed at recognizing trust ownership for assets that should be administered under the trust. For some estates, other assets or legal issues may still require formal probate administration. If the estate includes assets that cannot be transferred through a petition or if there are outstanding creditor claims needing resolution, probate may still be necessary. Evaluating the complete estate and planning strategy helps determine whether the petition resolves all required matters or if additional probate steps are warranted.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on court filing fees, required service fees, and the time needed to prepare the petition and supporting documents. Filing fees are set by court rules and can change, while attorney fees depend on the complexity of the matter and the amount of work required to assemble evidence, respond to objections, and attend hearings. Less complex, uncontested petitions generally cost less than contested matters that require extensive discovery or litigation. When estimating cost, consider the value of the asset at issue, the number of interested parties, and whether title companies or financial institutions will cooperate. Discussing expected fees and potential additional costs up front helps trustees plan for the process and make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus other resolution methods.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may require additional evidence, briefing, or a hearing to resolve the dispute. Objections can raise questions about the settlor’s intent, competing ownership claims, or procedural issues. The court will evaluate the evidence from both sides and issue a ruling based on the law and the record presented. Resolving objections may involve negotiation, supplemental documentation, or litigation on contested factual or legal points. When objections arise, timely responses and clear evidentiary support are important. Trustees should be prepared to address challenges with documentation and legal argument. In some cases, mediation or settlement discussions can resolve disagreements without prolonged litigation. Where disputes cannot be resolved informally, the court’s decision will determine title and the appropriate path forward for administration.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include pursuing institutional retitling through banks or title companies, using affidavits of successor trustee when accepted by third parties, or negotiating voluntary transfers with interested parties. If institutions accept a certification of trust and transfer forms, retitling can be completed without court involvement. These alternatives can be faster and less expensive but depend on institutional policies and the absence of competing claims or disputes among beneficiaries. When informal approaches are not feasible or when title issues are contested, a petition provides formal legal resolution. Evaluating the asset type, institutional responsiveness, and the likelihood of objections guides the choice between informal remedies and court filing. Careful analysis helps trustees choose the approach that protects beneficiary interests while minimizing cost and delay.
A Heggstad petition can address assets located out of state if the property is governed by California law and the trust’s administration involves California courts, but additional jurisdictional considerations may arise. For real property located in another state, local recording and transfer rules may apply, and coordination with counsel in the other state may be necessary. The court addressing the petition must have appropriate authority, and practical steps to retitle out-of-state assets can be more complex than for in-state property. When dealing with out-of-state assets, careful evaluation of governing law, recording requirements, and the cooperation of local institutions is essential. In some instances, parallel filings or local counsel engagement may be advisable to complete transfers efficiently and in compliance with the other state’s procedures. Clear planning and coordination help ensure that court orders translate into effective transfers across jurisdictions.
To begin preparing a Heggstad petition, start by locating the trust instrument, certification of trust if available, deeds, account statements, transfer paperwork, and any communications that show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Make a list of interested parties and verify current contact information. Gathering a complete set of records and organizing them logically provides the foundation for a persuasive petition. Early documentation collection reduces the likelihood of follow-up requests and supports the petition’s credibility. Next, consult with counsel who can assess the strength of the evidence and advise whether institutional remedies might work or if filing is recommended. A lawyer can assist in drafting the petition, preparing affidavits, ensuring proper service, and representing the trustee in court if necessary. Proactive steps and clear documentation help streamline the process and increase the chance of obtaining a court order that effectively resolves the title issue.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas