If you are considering changes to a trust in Lake Los Angeles, a trust modification petition can provide a legal path to adjust trust terms, trustees, or beneficiaries. This introductory overview explains how a petition works, what issues commonly prompt modifications, and the practical steps involved. Whether the need arises from changed family circumstances, updated tax concerns, or corrections to drafting mistakes, understanding the process helps you make informed choices. We also outline typical timelines and the types of documentation that support a petition, so you can prepare before filing or consulting with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to amend an existing trust when the parties cannot resolve the change through the trust’s amendment provisions. This second introduction emphasizes why clear evidence and proper notice matter. Courts consider factors such as settlor intent, changes in law, and unforeseen circumstances. In Lake Los Angeles and throughout Los Angeles County, petitions must meet local procedural rules and provide robust factual support. Early preparation, including gathering financial records, prior trust documents, and witness statements, increases the likelihood the court will approve necessary adjustments while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Bringing a trust modification petition can preserve a settlor’s intent while adapting the trust to present realities. This process can resolve ambiguities, correct drafting errors, and address life events such as divorce, remarriage, relocation, or changes in health and finances. A successful modification can prevent future disputes, reduce administrative burdens for trustees, and ensure assets are distributed according to current intentions. The legal process also creates a formal record of the change, offering beneficiaries clarity and protecting trustees from future liability. Properly handled petitions balance the interests of all parties and seek outcomes that reflect the trust’s purposes.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical legal assistance in complex estate planning matters, including trust modification petitions, for clients in Lake Los Angeles and across Los Angeles County. The firm focuses on clear communication, careful document preparation, and strategic navigation of local court procedures. Our approach emphasizes thorough fact gathering and thoughtful advocacy so petitions are well supported and presented effectively. Clients receive guidance through each stage of the process, from initial evaluation to court filings and hearings, with attention to minimizing delay and reducing conflict among affected parties while protecting the settlor’s articulated intentions.
A trust modification petition asks the probate or superior court to approve changes to an existing trust when informal amendment options are unavailable or contested. Typical grounds include changes in circumstances that make original trust terms impracticable or inconsistent with the settlor’s likely intentions. The petition must present a coherent factual narrative, legal basis for the change, and appropriate notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties. Courts evaluate whether modifications respect the settlor’s purpose and whether the proposed change is equitable. Procedural details vary locally, so careful preparation and adherence to filing rules are essential for a favorable outcome.
Before filing, it is important to review the trust document for amendment clauses, successor trustee provisions, and any no-contest or dispute resolution language that might affect your options. Gathering contemporaneous evidence of the settlor’s intent, medical records if incapacity is involved, and financial statements helps build a persuasive case. In some situations, beneficiaries may reach an out-of-court agreement and submit a stipulated modification for court approval. When that is not possible, the petition process provides a formal avenue to resolve disagreements and achieve a binding modification approved by a judge, protecting the trust from future uncertainty.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing that seeks the court’s authority to change trust provisions, correct ambiguities, or approve transactions affecting trust property. It is used when the trust instrument itself cannot be amended by simple trustee action or when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes. The petition should clearly state the grounds for modification, the specific changes requested, and the factual support for those changes. The court assesses whether the modifications align with the settlor’s probable intent and whether implementing the changes serves the trust’s purpose. Proper notice to interested parties ensures due process and reduces the risk of later challenges.
Successful petitions generally include a clear petition document, supporting declarations, authenticated copies of the trust and related instruments, and evidence such as correspondence, financial records, or medical documentation. The process requires serving notice to beneficiaries and posting or publication when required by local rules. After filing, interested parties may respond or object, and the court may schedule hearings. Settlement discussions often occur before trial, and agreed modifications can be presented for the court’s approval. The judge will consider legal standards, settlor intent, and fairness to beneficiaries when deciding whether to permit the proposed changes.
Understanding common terms makes it easier to follow a trust modification petition. This section defines frequently encountered words and explains how they relate to the process. Terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust amendment, petition, decree, and related procedural concepts. Knowing these definitions helps you evaluate the case and recognize the roles of various documents and court filings. It also aids in communicating effectively with legal counsel and ensures that decisions are informed and deliberate, reducing surprises during the court process and improving the prospects for a smooth modification.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and set its original terms and purposes. The settlor’s intent and directives are central to any modification petition, as courts aim to honor those intentions when possible. Evidence regarding the settlor’s statements, lifestyle changes, or subsequent actions can inform the court’s view about whether a proposed change aligns with the trust’s core objectives. If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, the petition must rely on documentary proof and testimony to demonstrate that the requested modification reflects what the settlor would have wanted under current circumstances.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have a legal interest in trust property and must be provided notice of petitions that affect their rights. Their responses or objections play a significant role in the court’s assessment of proposed modifications. The court will weigh beneficiary interests, whether modifications would unduly prejudice anyone, and whether alternative solutions exist that respect both the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries’ reasonable expectations under the trust.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for administering the trust, managing assets, and carrying out distributions in accordance with the trust terms. In modification proceedings, trustees may file petitions, object to proposed changes, or request court guidance. The trustee’s fiduciary duties require impartiality and adherence to the trust document and court orders. If a trustee seeks to modify a trust, the court will scrutinize the rationale and supporting evidence to ensure any changes comply with legal standards and protect beneficiaries from self-dealing or conflicts of interest.
A modification petition is the formal legal filing that requests the court to change trust provisions, remove or replace a trustee, or clarify ambiguous language. It should include the relief sought, legal authority, and facts supporting the request. The petition identifies interested parties, explains notice procedures, and may include proposed orders for the judge to sign. When a petition resolves a genuine issue of trust administration or aligns the trust with changed circumstances, the court may grant the requested relief and issue a binding order reflecting the approved modifications.
When circumstances change, parties may consider several pathways: informal amendment by the settlor, beneficiary consent and stipulated modification, court petition for modification, or, in limited situations, trust decanting where allowed. Each option has procedural and evidentiary differences. Informal amendments work best when the settlor is able and willing to act. Stipulated modifications reduce litigation but require agreement. Court petitions are necessary when parties disagree or the settlor cannot act. Decanting can transfer assets to a new trust with different terms, but it depends on statutory authority and trustee powers, and it may not be appropriate for every situation.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when beneficiaries have conflicting positions, the trust contains ambiguous language, or there are allegations of undue influence or incapacity. In such situations, careful case development is essential to establish facts, collect documentary evidence, and craft persuasive legal arguments. Courts examine the totality of circumstances, so methodical preparation enhances the petition’s credibility. A thorough approach also anticipates potential objections and identifies procedural strategies that reduce the risk of delay or adverse rulings, helping to secure a durable resolution.
When proposed modifications affect asset distribution, tax planning, or estate liquidity, an in-depth legal assessment is necessary to avoid unintended consequences. Modifications that change beneficiary shares, alter trust funding, or redirect retirement benefits can trigger tax events or expose the estate to liabilities. A careful analysis coordinates legal, financial, and tax considerations and ensures that filings and proposed orders accurately reflect the intended outcomes. The goal is to implement changes that preserve value, reduce future disputes, and maintain compliance with applicable tax and trust law requirements.
A comprehensive approach provides clarity, protects beneficiaries’ rights, and reduces the likelihood of future litigation by creating a carefully documented record of the reasons for change. Thorough preparation ensures the court has the evidence necessary to approve sensible modifications and helps trustees act with confidence. It also supports negotiated solutions where appropriate, saves time by anticipating objections, and builds orders that withstand later challenges. Overall, a deliberate process protects family relationships and trust assets while achieving legally sound outcomes.
Comprehensive preparation also addresses ancillary issues such as successor trustee designations, funding adjustments, and related estate planning documents like pour-over wills or power of attorney updates. By coordinating associated planning steps, the trust and overall estate plan remain aligned with current goals and circumstances. This reduces administrative complexity for trustees and provides beneficiaries with clearer expectations about distributions and long-term planning. In many cases, the effort invested upfront prevents costly disputes and helps maintain continuity in trust administration.
One important benefit of a comprehensive approach is enhanced legal certainty. When changes are supported by detailed evidence, clear legal arguments, and well-drafted orders, the resulting court approval is less susceptible to challenge. This stability helps trustees perform their duties without second-guessing, and beneficiaries receive a reliable framework for their expectations. Reduced dispute risk preserves family relationships and prevents costly litigation that can deplete estate assets and cause prolonged uncertainty for those who depend on trust distributions.
A thorough review and modification process ensures the trust reflects present-day realities, from family changes to shifts in financial circumstances. Aligning trust terms with current needs supports better asset management, clearer distribution plans, and a more efficient administration process. It also provides an opportunity to address related documents such as financial powers of attorney, health care directives, and pour-over wills, creating a cohesive estate plan. The result is a trust structure that is practical to administer and better suited to fulfill the settlor’s ongoing objectives.
Collecting clear documentation to support a proposed modification is essential. This includes the original trust, any prior amendments, correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent, and financial records showing changes in asset composition. If health or capacity are relevant, contemporaneous medical records and professional observations can be important. Witness statements or affidavits that corroborate the settlor’s wishes add persuasive weight. Having organized, credible evidence streamlines the petition process and communicates to the court and interested parties that the request is reasonable and well-founded.
When proposing modifications, review related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and trust funding instruments. Changes to trust terms may affect how assets flow, who has authority during incapacity, and how distributions will be handled. Ensuring consistency across documents prevents unintended consequences and administrative confusion later. Updating or confirming beneficiary designations and trustee appointments at the same time can provide a cohesive plan that is easier to administer and less likely to invite disputes down the line.
People seek trust modifications for many practical reasons, including correcting drafting errors, addressing changed family structures, adapting to tax law changes, or responding to trustee incapacity or misconduct. A petition can clarify ambiguous terms, remove or replace trustees who cannot fulfill their duties, or adjust distribution schemes to reflect new circumstances. It is also used to reconcile conflicts among beneficiaries or to enforce what the settlor apparently intended. Timely action helps prevent administrative issues and ensures trust assets are managed as intended under present conditions.
Other reasons to pursue a petition include addressing unanticipated trust funding issues, modifying provisions that have become impractical, or adapting legacy planning to current family dynamics. Requests may aim to add or remove beneficiaries, update trustee powers, or account for changes in real estate or retirement assets. Seeking court approval provides an authoritative resolution that binds interested parties and reduces the likelihood of future challenges. Thoughtful consideration of the broader estate plan accompanies most successful petitions to ensure the requested change integrates well with overall planning goals.
Circumstances prompting modifications often involve events such as divorce, remarriage, death of a beneficiary, the settlor’s decline in health, or significant changes in asset composition. Other triggers include ambiguous language discovered during administration, conflicts among beneficiaries, or newly discovered assets that need to be integrated into the trust. Additionally, legislative or tax law changes may make existing terms inefficient or counterproductive. Identifying the principal reason for modification helps tailor the petition and supporting evidence so the court can evaluate the requested relief effectively.
A family event such as divorce, remarriage, or the birth of a child often leads to reconsideration of trust terms. These life changes may warrant adjustments to beneficiaries, distribution timing, or trustee powers. Modifications can preserve the settlor’s goals while adapting to new family structures. The petition should document how the change affects the trust’s operation and why the proposed adjustment better reflects current intentions. Courts look for evidence that the modification respects the settlor’s probable wishes and treats beneficiaries fairly given the changed circumstances.
Drafting errors, unclear language, or internal inconsistencies can hinder trust administration and invite disputes. A modification petition can correct mistakes, clarify ambiguous provisions, or reconcile conflicting clauses to enable the trustee to act with confidence. The petition should present the drafting problem, explain its practical effect on administration, and propose precise wording for the court to approve. Clear and narrowly tailored corrections reduce the chance of unintended consequences and streamline future trust management.
When a trustee becomes incapacitated, resigns, or engages in conduct that prevents proper administration, a petition can remove or replace the trustee and appoint a successor. The filing should document the reasons for removal and propose a suitable replacement or range of candidates. Courts carefully consider fiduciary accountability and the need to protect beneficiaries while maintaining continuity in trust management. Properly supported petitions help ensure the trust remains effectively managed and that beneficiaries’ interests are preserved.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation and guidance for residents of Lake Los Angeles and surrounding areas in Los Angeles County. Our firm assists with preparing and filing trust modification petitions, coordinating notices, and managing court hearings. We focus on organizing the factual record, drafting clear proposed orders, and working with trustees and beneficiaries to seek efficient and equitable resolutions. Clients receive attentive communication about local court procedures and timelines, ensuring they understand the requirements and possible outcomes involved in the modification process.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for practical, process-focused representation in trust matters. The firm emphasizes careful document preparation, consistent communication, and familiarity with Los Angeles County probate procedures. We assist clients in assembling the evidence needed to support a petition, manage required notices, and present proposed orders that are clear and legally sound. Our approach is designed to reduce delay and expense while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries during the court process.
We help clients evaluate whether a stipulated modification is possible and pursue negotiated resolutions when feasible, while also preparing thorough petitions for contested matters. Attention to procedural detail, clear legal reasoning, and careful drafting of pleadings improve the likelihood of a favorable court ruling. Throughout the engagement, clients receive transparent explanations of their options, potential risks, and expected timelines so they can make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition in Lake Los Angeles and Los Angeles County courts.
Our firm also coordinates with other advisors, including financial and tax professionals, to ensure that modifications do not produce unintended consequences. We prepare comprehensive proposed orders and support documents so the court can approve effective, enforceable changes. By focusing on practical solutions and clear communication among parties, we seek to resolve trust administration challenges with as little disruption as possible and to protect the long-term interests of beneficiaries and trustees.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents, related estate planning instruments, and the facts prompting the requested change. We then identify interested parties, gather supporting evidence, and evaluate potential legal grounds for modification. If negotiations are possible, we pursue stipulations to streamline court approval. When litigation is necessary, we prepare a detailed petition, file required notices, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, required documentation, and likely outcomes so they can participate in informed decision-making.
The first formal step is a thorough review of the trust, any amendments, related estate documents, and relevant facts. This assessment determines whether an informal amendment, stipulated modification, or court petition is the appropriate course. Key tasks include identifying beneficiaries, reviewing trustee powers, and gathering evidence showing why a change is warranted. This phase also considers potential objections and legal defenses so that the petition strategy can address foreseeable challenges and present a coherent request for relief to the court.
Gathering all existing trust documents, amendments, and supporting records is essential to draft a persuasive petition. This includes copies of the trust instrument, financial statements, property deeds, correspondence relevant to settlor intent, and any previous court orders affecting the trust. Medical records or witness statements may be necessary when capacity or intent is questioned. Comprehensive records allow for accurate proposed language and reduce ambiguity in filings. Well-documented cases proceed more smoothly through notice, response, and hearing stages.
Identifying and notifying all interested parties is a procedural necessity. This includes beneficiaries, heirs, named trustees, and sometimes creditors. Accurate notice prevents procedural defects and ensures that objections are timely and properly filed. Local court rules determine specific requirements for service, publication, and filing. Properly prepared notice documents explain the relief sought and the timeline for responses. Attention to this phase avoids delays and preserves the jurisdictional integrity of the petition proceeding.
Once records and parties are identified, we prepare a clear, well-researched petition that states the facts, legal basis, and requested modifications. Supporting declarations and exhibits provide factual foundation. Proposed orders and redlined trust language help the court understand the precise changes sought. After filing, we ensure service of notices and monitor response deadlines. If objections arise, we evaluate their merits and pursue negotiation or prepare responsive pleadings. Accurate and persuasive filings set the stage for judicial review and possible approval.
Supporting declarations explain the factual context and grounds for modification, often including witness statements and documentary exhibits. Declarations should be clear, factual, and tied to specific provisions of the trust. Exhibits such as financial records and correspondence corroborate assertions. Together, these materials help the court assess whether the proposed change advances the trust’s purpose and respects the settlor’s intentions. Presenting organized evidence makes hearings more efficient and helps judges reach informed decisions.
After filing, we manage formal service on all interested parties and monitor responsive pleadings or objections. If beneficiaries respond with concerns, we evaluate options for negotiation, stipulation, or litigation. Timely management of procedural deadlines and communication with opposing counsel or pro se parties is crucial to maintaining momentum. In many cases, resolving issues through settlement reduces court time and expense, while contested matters require focused advocacy at hearings and possible trial to obtain the requested relief.
The final phase includes hearings where the court reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections. We present the factual and legal basis for the requested modification and respond to challenges. If the court approves the modification, it issues an order that legally amends the trust terms. The order should be clear about implementation steps, trustee responsibilities, and any conditions. Following court approval, trustees and beneficiaries take the actions necessary to apply the new terms and update related estate planning documents as required.
At hearing, clear argumentation and organized evidence help the judge evaluate the request efficiently. Witness testimony may support factual claims, and counsel addresses legal standards governing modifications. The goal is to demonstrate that the proposed change is appropriate given the settlor’s intent, the trust’s purpose, and the facts presented. Skilled presentation of the petition and a readiness to answer questions about implementation often influence the court’s decision and the scope of any order the judge signs.
After a court order, trustees must take specific steps to implement changes, such as updating trust records, transferring assets, and notifying financial institutions or beneficiaries. The order should be recorded or presented to third parties as necessary to effectuate changes in title or account designations. We assist with follow-up actions, drafting conforming documents, and advising trustees on compliance with the order. Proper implementation prevents future disputes and ensures the trust operates under the revised terms as intended.
Circumstances that commonly prompt a petition include changes in family status such as divorce or remarriage, the death of a beneficiary, trustee incapacity, drafting errors, ambiguities discovered during administration, or changes in financial circumstances that render original provisions impractical. A petition is also appropriate when the settlor cannot act to make a direct amendment, or when parties cannot agree on a stipulated modification. Courts look for evidence that the requested change serves the trust’s purpose and aligns with what the settlor likely wanted. Filing a petition should be considered after evaluating alternative routes such as an informal amendment by the settlor, a stipulated modification among beneficiaries, or available statutory remedies. The decision to petition the court depends on the strength of supporting evidence and the likelihood of opposition. Early fact gathering and careful assessment of risks and benefits help determine whether judicial intervention is the appropriate path.
Timing varies significantly based on case complexity, local court schedules, and whether parties agree to a stipulated modification. In straightforward, uncontested matters with complete documentation and cooperative beneficiaries, the process can be resolved in a few months. Contested petitions involving disputes, extensive evidence, or multiple hearings may take longer. Court calendars in Los Angeles County can influence scheduling, and procedural steps such as required notices and objection periods contribute to the timeline. Preparing well-documented filings and pursuing negotiated resolutions where possible can shorten the process. Prompt communication with interested parties and timely responses to court requirements also reduce delay. While some uncertainty is inherent, careful planning and proactive case management often lead to more predictable timelines and quicker implementation of approved modifications.
Beneficiaries have the right to receive notice and to object to a proposed modification. If beneficiaries file timely objections, the court will consider their concerns and the merits of the petition. Objections can lead to further discovery, evidentiary hearings, or settlement discussions. The court weighs beneficiary interests against the petition’s justification, settlor intent, and the trust’s purpose when deciding whether to grant the requested change. While objections may delay or complicate the proceeding, they do not automatically prevent a petition from succeeding. A well-supported petition that addresses objections with factual evidence and legal reasoning can still prevail. In many cases, mediation or negotiation among parties reduces conflict and leads to a stipulated resolution that the court will approve, avoiding protracted adversarial litigation.
Courts find contemporaneous documentation and clear witness statements particularly persuasive. Evidence includes original trust documents, prior amendments, written communications from the settlor expressing intent, financial records, and medical documentation when capacity is at issue. Affidavits from witnesses who can testify about the settlor’s statements or circumstances surrounding the trust’s creation add credibility. Clear, organized exhibits and declarations that directly support the requested modification improve a petition’s chances. In contested matters, objective documentary evidence outweighs hearsay or uncorroborated claims. Demonstrating how the proposed modification resolves a practical problem or better effectuates the settlor’s intent helps the court see the necessity of change. Providing proposed orders and redlined trust language also assists the court in understanding the precise relief sought and how it will be implemented.
A trust modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change, the types of assets involved, and applicable state and federal laws. For example, modifications that alter grantor trust status or change beneficiary allocations in ways that trigger tax events should be evaluated with tax considerations in mind. Potential creditor claims may also be affected, depending on the timing and nature of the modification. Consulting financial advisors or tax professionals alongside legal counsel helps identify and mitigate adverse consequences. When modifications are designed to correct errors or reflect new circumstances without creating avoidance schemes, courts generally focus on intent and fairness. Proper documentation and transparent procedures reduce the risk of allegations that changes were made to defraud creditors or improperly deprive beneficiaries. Careful coordination with financial planning mitigates unforeseen tax or creditor exposure and supports a legally sound modification.
A trustee may file a petition to modify a trust when the trustee determines that a change is necessary for proper administration, when authority granted in the trust allows for such action, or when the trustee seeks court instruction on ambiguous terms. The trustee’s duty of impartiality and fidelity to the trust’s purpose guides any petition, and courts will scrutinize petitions by trustees to ensure they are justified and not self-serving. Trustees must provide appropriate notice and documentation showing why the requested modification benefits the trust and beneficiaries. When a trustee initiates a petition, the court considers the trustee’s motives and the evidence presented to assess whether modification is warranted. If beneficiaries object, the trustee must address their concerns and demonstrate how the change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent. Transparent procedures and careful factual support help the trustee obtain judicial approval while maintaining trust administration integrity.
Alternatives to court petitions include direct amendments by the settlor when they retain capacity, stipulated modifications agreed to by all interested parties, and, where allowed, trust decanting by a trustee with statutory authority to transfer assets to a new trust with different terms. Each alternative has legal prerequisites and potential limitations. Informal approaches are efficient when they are feasible, but they require clear authority and documentation to avoid future challenges. Stipulated modifications are particularly useful when beneficiaries and trustees reach consensus, as the court can approve the settlement and issue an order that formalizes the change. Decanting may be appropriate in some contexts but depends on trustee powers and state law. Where alternatives are not available or parties disagree, a petition remains the formal route to secure enforceable changes.
Disputes among beneficiaries during a petition are often resolved through negotiation, mediation, or court-directed settlement discussions. Courts encourage parties to narrow disputed issues and may refer them to alternative dispute resolution to conserve judicial resources. Mediation allows parties to explore compromises that preserve relationships and reach a mutually acceptable resolution. When settlement proves impossible, the court holds hearings and decides based on the factual and legal record presented. Constructive communication and willingness to consider reasonable compromises can significantly reduce litigation costs and delay. Counsel often helps structure proposals that address primary concerns while maintaining key elements of the trust. Even when formal litigation proceeds, prior attempts at negotiation demonstrate to the court that parties acted in good faith and may influence the court’s approach to equitable relief.
Costs vary based on complexity, whether the matter is contested, and local court fees. Uncontested or stipulated modifications incur lower costs, largely consisting of filing fees, minimal attorney fees for document preparation, and possible costs for service and record retrieval. Contested petitions involve additional expenses for discovery, depositions, motion practice, and hearing time, which can increase fees and prolong timelines. Accurate budgeting and early case assessment help clients understand and manage anticipated costs. Transparent communication about fee structures, anticipated tasks, and potential additional expenses helps clients plan. Pursuing negotiated resolutions when feasible reduces costs, while careful preparation and efficient case management limit time spent in court. Reviewing alternatives and realistic outcomes in the early stage often helps control costs and aligns expectations about the financial investment required to achieve the desired result.
After the court approves a modification petition, it issues an order that legally implements the agreed or adjudicated changes. The order should specify the revised trust language, any trustee appointments, and directions for implementing distributions or asset transfers. Trustees and beneficiaries must follow the court’s instructions, update trust records, and make necessary account and title changes to reflect the modification. The order becomes part of the trust’s formal record and reduces the risk of future disputes about the same issues. Following approval, we assist with implementation tasks such as preparing conforming documents, updating beneficiary designations where applicable, and communicating with financial institutions to effectuate transfers. Proper follow-up ensures the practical results of the court’s decision are realized and that trust administration continues smoothly under the revised terms, protecting both trustee and beneficiary interests in the long term.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas