If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Lancaster, a trust modification petition can provide a clear legal path to update trust terms, correct errors, or address changed family or financial circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with petitions involving revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, Heggstad petitions, and related estate planning instruments. We serve residents in Lancaster and throughout Los Angeles County and California, and can explain whether a court petition is required or whether the trust can be amended outside of court. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss how a modification may affect your estate plan and beneficiaries.
Trust modifications arise for many reasons: marriage, divorce, remarriage, new children or grandchildren, retirement, sale or purchase of significant assets, or shifts in beneficiary needs. In Lancaster and nearby communities, local court practice and county filing requirements affect how petitions are processed, so it helps to review local rules early. Whether you have a revocable living trust created years ago or documents like a pour-over will or certification of trust, a careful evaluation ensures proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent and California law. Our goal is to outline realistic options and next steps in clear, practical terms.
Modifying a trust can prevent future disputes, clarify trustee authority, and ensure assets are distributed as intended. When personal circumstances change, an updated trust can reflect new priorities, remove or add beneficiaries, and correct drafting mistakes that might create ambiguity. A formal petition to the court can also address issues like trustee incapacity or clerical errors that cannot be resolved by private amendment. In many cases, securing a judicial order that validates a change reduces the risk of later litigation and helps trustees carry out their duties with greater confidence and transparency for beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust-related representation for clients across California, including Lancaster. Our firm handles a full range of documents from revocable living trusts and pour-over wills to Heggstad petitions and trust modifications. We focus on careful document review, clear communication, and pragmatic advice tailored to each family’s goals. Clients reach us at 408-528-2827 for initial discussions. We work to explain the legal framework, likely timelines, and practical implications of any proposed change so that clients can make informed decisions about their estate plans.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a judge to approve changes to a trust or to resolve ambiguities that prevent proper administration. In California, some trusts may be modified privately when the trust instrument allows it and all necessary parties consent, while other situations require a petition because a settlor is incapacitated, a trustee is deceased, or documents conflict. Petitions commonly request orders to correct mistakes, clarify ambiguous language, add or remove trustees, or validate transfers made to the trust. Understanding whether court involvement is necessary is the first step in planning an effective modification strategy.
California law provides specific mechanisms such as Heggstad petitions to incorporate assets that were transferred outside the formal trust record and pour-over wills to funnel estate assets into a trust. For irrevocable trusts, modification options are limited and often require beneficiary consent or judicial approval. The process generally involves reviewing trust documents, determining applicable statutory grounds, preparing supporting declarations and evidence, serving notice on interested parties, and attending any required hearings. Early assessment of each of these elements helps identify likely outcomes and potential objections so the matter can be advanced efficiently.
A trust modification petition formally requests that a court approve changes to an existing trust or resolve legal questions about trust terms. The petition should explain the legal basis for the requested change, present supporting evidence such as declarations or documents, and identify interested parties for notice. Reasons for filing include correcting drafting errors, clarifying trustee powers, addressing changes in family circumstances, or confirming that certain transfers belong to the trust. Once filed, the court evaluates the facts, hears objections if any, and may issue an order granting, denying, or conditioning the requested modification based on law and equitable considerations.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear description of the trust instrument, the specific changes requested, factual background that supports the changes, and legal authority under California law. The process typically begins with document review and fact gathering, followed by drafting the petition and supporting declarations. Proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is essential. The court may schedule a hearing to review objections and evidence, after which it may issue an order approving the modification, denying it, or suggesting an alternative remedy. Timely follow-up is important to implement the order and update trust records.
The following glossary explains common terms you will encounter when considering a trust modification petition. Familiarity with terms like revocable living trust, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, certification of trust, and trustee capacity helps when reviewing documents or speaking with counsel. Understanding these definitions reduces confusion and makes it easier to gather the right records, identify interested parties, and decide whether a court filing is necessary. The terminology also clarifies the differences between private amendments, beneficiary agreements, and court-ordered modifications under California law.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning document created during a settlor’s lifetime that can typically be amended or revoked by the settlor while they have capacity. It holds title to assets, directs how assets will be managed during incapacity, and specifies distribution instructions after death. Because it is revocable, the settlor generally retains broad authority to make changes without court intervention, provided the trust document permits amendment and required formalities are followed. If the settlor becomes incapacitated or the document is unclear, a petition may be needed to clarify or enforce the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a specific California procedure used to establish that an asset transferred without formal retitling or clear documentation was intended to be part of a trust. This petition asks the court to recognize the asset as trust property so that it can be administered under the trust terms. Heggstad petitions are commonly used when a transferor believed an asset had become part of the trust but legal title or documentary evidence was incomplete. The court reviews evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances before determining whether the asset belongs to the trust.
A pour-over will works together with a trust to ensure any assets not already placed into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime are transferred into the trust at death. The will directs that remaining probate estate assets be ‘poured over’ into the trust, so the trust governs final distributions. If a pour-over will is involved in a trust modification matter, the interplay between probate administration and trust administration must be considered. A court petition may sometimes be necessary to reconcile pour-over provisions with existing trust terms or to confirm asset ownership.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate or superior court seeking approval to change a trust, correct an error, confirm the status of assets, or resolve disputes about trustee authority or beneficiary rights. The petition should identify the trust, describe the requested change, provide supporting facts, and list interested parties for service. Courts evaluate petitions under applicable statutes and case law, considering the settlor’s intent, beneficiary interests, and fairness. Successful petitions result in court orders that clarify or alter trust terms and enable administrators to proceed with confidence.
When considering trust changes in Lancaster, you can often choose between private amendments, beneficiary agreements, or a court petition. Private amendment works when the settlor retains capacity and the trust permits changes. Beneficiary agreements may resolve issues when all beneficiaries consent. A court petition becomes necessary when the settlor is incapacitated, parties disagree, or there are ownership questions that must be resolved judicially. Each approach has trade-offs in terms of cost, timing, and the level of finality provided, so evaluating your objectives and the trust language helps identify the most appropriate path.
Limited updates address clerical or administrative issues such as correcting a name, updating a mailing address, or clarifying an ambiguous clause that does not alter beneficiary interests. These changes may be accomplished through a straightforward amendment when the trust allows it and the settlor is capable of signing the amendment. Addressing such matters promptly reduces confusion for trustees and beneficiaries and can prevent minor problems from escalating into more complex disputes that might later require judicial intervention.
When a trustee, successor trustee, or personal representative’s contact information becomes outdated, or when a named trustee is no longer able to serve, a limited update or amendment can be an appropriate solution. These changes keep trust administration efficient and ensure notices reach the right parties. If the trust document expressly permits simple substitutions, making these updates without court involvement saves time and expense. However, if the change affects beneficiary rights or is contested, court review may be necessary to achieve a durable resolution.
When family dynamics shift through marriage, divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, or when wealth increases or decreases substantially, a comprehensive review of the trust and related estate planning documents is often warranted. Such a review assesses whether current provisions reflect the settlor’s intentions, whether tax planning tools remain appropriate, and whether beneficiary needs have changed. A holistic review helps coordinate trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and advance directives to create a consistent plan that addresses financial, health care, and legacy concerns together.
When documents conflict, beneficiaries raise objections, or ambiguous language creates uncertainty, a comprehensive approach reduces the likelihood of future litigation. This may include reconciling multiple instruments, determining the proper interpretation of disputed clauses, and preparing evidence to support a court petition if necessary. Addressing these issues proactively through thorough review and careful document drafting improves the chances of securing court approval and achieving a durable outcome that protects the trust’s intended distributions and administration.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all documents work together and that modifications do not create unintended gaps or conflicts. By reviewing trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives as a package, potential issues such as inconsistent beneficiary designations or missing asset transfers can be identified and resolved. This approach helps protect the settlor’s goals, reduces the risk of disputes among beneficiaries, and improves the efficiency of administration when incapacity or death occurs. Comprehensive planning also supports orderly asset management and distribution.
Comprehensive review also clarifies trustee powers and successor arrangements so fiduciaries understand their duties and limitations. That clarity helps trustees make informed decisions about investments, distributions, and communications with beneficiaries. Where court petitions are required, a coordinated record and well-prepared presentation of facts increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling. Overall, a thorough review makes implementation smoother, increases transparency among interested parties, and provides a stronger foundation for carrying out the settlor’s intentions reliably.
Addressing inconsistencies and clarifying ambiguous provisions reduces the chances that beneficiaries will later contest distributions or trustee actions. A comprehensive approach documents intent, aligns related estate planning instruments, and anticipates areas of potential disagreement. Where necessary, a court-ordered modification can provide definitive resolution that limits future litigation. Reducing uncertainty benefits trustees and beneficiaries alike by making administration more predictable and minimizing the time and expense involved in resolving contested matters after the settlor’s incapacity or death.
A comprehensive review improves clarity about how assets should be managed and distributed, which supports efficient administration and helps protect the value of the estate. By confirming titles, beneficiary designations, and funding of the trust, the process reduces the need for probate and lowers administrative friction. Trustees benefit from unambiguous authority, and beneficiaries understand their rights and timelines. This clarity helps ensure that distributions occur according to the settlor’s intentions and that assets are handled in a manner consistent with estate planning goals and legal requirements.
Begin by collecting all related estate planning documents, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that relates to asset transfers. A folder containing the original trust document, amendments, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and letters to trustees streamlines the review. Having complete records makes it easier to determine whether assets are properly titled and whether a Heggstad or other petition is necessary. Early organization also helps identify interested parties who must be notified and reduces delays that can arise from missing or incomplete paperwork during the petition process.
When contemplating a modification, evaluate the long-term consequences for taxation, asset protection, creditor claims, and beneficiary needs. A seemingly simple change may have cascading effects on distribution timing, eligibility for public benefits, or the management of family assets. Reviewing the overall estate plan, including powers of attorney and advance health care directives, ensures consistency across documents. Taking a holistic view helps prevent unanticipated consequences and aligns revisions with broader goals for legacy planning and family financial security.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including to correct drafting errors, address changed family circumstances such as remarriage or new children, add or remove trustees, or resolve disputes over asset ownership. When a settlor has become incapacitated or has passed away, beneficiaries or trustees may need court assistance to clarify authority or confirm that certain assets belong to the trust. A petition provides a formal legal record that can guide administration and reduce future disputes among interested parties.
Other reasons include updating distributions to reflect changes in financial goals, ensuring trustee powers are adequate for evolving asset types, or reconciling inconsistencies between a trust and related instruments like pour-over wills or retirement plan trusts. When assets were intended for the trust but were never retitled properly, petitions such as a Heggstad filing can bring those assets under trust administration. Ultimately, a petition is a tool to achieve certainty, protect beneficiary rights, and implement the settlor’s intent under California law.
Common circumstances include changes in marital status, the death or incapacity of a trustee or beneficiary, acquisition or sale of significant assets, or the emergence of beneficiary needs such as special needs planning. Administrative mistakes, unclear language in the trust document, or transfers intended for the trust that lack clear title can also trigger the need for court action. Recognizing these situations early and assembling proper documentation helps determine whether a private amendment will suffice or whether a petition is required to resolve matters formally.
When a trustee dies or becomes unable to serve, successor trustees named in the trust may step in, but ambiguities in succession language can cause delays in administration. A petition can confirm successor authority, address gaps in the chain of title, and obtain orders that allow the new trustee to manage trust assets without interruption. Acting promptly helps preserve asset value, maintain continuity in administration, and ensure beneficiaries receive timely information about trust management and distributions.
Marriage, divorce, remarriage, or the birth of new children or grandchildren commonly prompt trust revisions. These life events often change the settlor’s priorities for asset distribution and trustee selection. A trust modification petition may be needed if the settlor cannot sign amendments due to incapacity, if parties disagree about changes, or if there are competing documents. Addressing these matters through a careful review helps align the estate plan with current family circumstances and the settlor’s intended legacy.
Acquiring significant assets such as a business interest, investment property, or retirement accounts may require updates to the trust to ensure proper management and distribution. If new assets were not retitled into the trust, a Heggstad petition or other court procedure may be necessary to confirm their inclusion. Ensuring that titles, beneficiary designations, and trust language reflect the settlor’s intentions prevents administrative complications and aligns the estate plan with current asset ownership and financial planning goals.
We serve Lancaster residents with practical representation for trust modifications and related probate matters. Whether your issue involves a revocable living trust amendment, a Heggstad petition, or a dispute over trustee authority, we explain local filing procedures and help prepare the record needed for court review. Clients find it helpful to discuss options before filing so the right approach can be selected for the circumstances. For assistance, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial review and learn about likely next steps in Lancaster and Los Angeles County.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer focused estate planning and trust services across California, including Lancaster. We assist clients in preparing petitions, coordinating with trustees and beneficiaries, and navigating court procedures. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document preparation, and practical planning to achieve enforceable results. Clients who engage our office receive personalized attention throughout the petition process, from initial review and evidence gathering through any hearings and final implementation steps.
We place a priority on timely updates and regular status reports so clients understand progress and practical implications at each stage. Whether the matter requires negotiation with beneficiaries or a formal court appearance, the goal is to resolve trust issues efficiently while protecting the settlor’s objectives and minimizing unnecessary delays. We also coordinate implementation tasks after a court order, such as updating trust records, retitling assets, and preparing any follow-up documents needed to complete the trust administration process.
The firm handles a broad range of estate planning documents that commonly intersect with trust modifications, including revocable living trusts, last wills and testaments, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, general assignments of assets to trust, certifications of trust, irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, special needs trusts, pet trusts, Heggstad petitions, trust modification petitions, pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations. Clients may call 408-528-2827 to discuss how these documents work together and what updates may be appropriate given current circumstances.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents, identification of the legal and factual issues, and a clear explanation of available options. We then gather evidence, prepare the necessary petition and supporting declarations, and ensure proper notice to interested parties. If a hearing is required, we prepare the record and advocate for a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory standards. After any order is obtained, we assist with implementing the changes and updating trust records to reflect the outcome.
The initial phase focuses on collecting all relevant materials, reviewing the trust language, beneficiary designations, titles, and any prior amendments. We assess whether the settlor retains amendment authority, whether beneficiaries consent, and whether court involvement is necessary. This assessment includes identifying parties who must be served and any potential objections that could arise. The goal is to create a realistic plan that balances cost, timing, and the likelihood of achieving the requested changes under California law.
Collecting original trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, powers of attorney, and related correspondence enables a full understanding of the factual and legal context. Careful review determines whether assets are properly titled, whether amendments exist, and whether supporting evidence is required to demonstrate intent. This stage includes identifying witnesses or records that may corroborate transfers or settlor intent, which can be essential for petitions such as a Heggstad petition or when correcting drafting errors.
After review, we discuss available legal options and their likely outcomes, including private amendments, beneficiary agreements, or court petitions. This conversation covers the steps involved, potential timelines, costs, and the risks associated with contested proceedings. With the client’s input, we select a strategy that aligns with goals and provides the best chance of a durable resolution. Clear communication about trade-offs ensures the client can make informed choices on how to proceed.
When court action is necessary, the next phase involves drafting the petition and assembling supporting declarations, exhibits, and evidence. We ensure the petition identifies the trust instrument, states the facts that justify modification, and cites applicable legal grounds. Proper service of notice on beneficiaries and other interested parties follows, and any tentative agreements are documented. Careful preparation at this stage improves the chance of a favorable result and helps shorten the time spent resolving objections.
Drafting requires framing the requested change clearly, presenting factual support, and attaching relevant documents such as trust excerpts, account statements, deeds, and declarations from knowledgeable parties. For petitions like Heggstad filings, evidence demonstrating intent to include assets in the trust is especially important. Clear, well-organized exhibits and declarations make it easier for the court to understand the request and the factual basis behind it, which can improve the likelihood of a favorable ruling without prolonged litigation.
After filing, stakeholders must be notified according to California procedural rules so they have an opportunity to respond. If objections are filed, we prepare responses and may engage in discussion to narrow issues or reach an agreement where possible. When disputes persist, we prepare for contested hearings by refining declarations, collecting additional evidence, and outlining legal arguments. Effective case management at this stage reduces surprises and helps present the strongest record to the court.
If the court holds a hearing, we present evidence and argument that supports the requested modification. Following a favorable order, we assist with implementing the decision by updating trust documents, retitling assets if required, notifying institutions, and preparing any follow-up paperwork. If the court denies the petition or issues conditions, we advise on next steps, which may include alternative planning measures or further proceedings. Timely implementation ensures that the trust administration proceeds in accordance with the court’s direction.
Preparation for hearings includes organizing exhibits, finalizing witness declarations, and rehearsing testimony or oral arguments. We prepare clear, factual presentations that convey the settlor’s intent and the legal basis for the requested relief. Effective preparation anticipates likely objections and addresses them with documentary evidence or corroborating statements. Well-prepared hearings streamline judicial review and increase the likelihood that the court will issue an order that supports reliable trust administration afterward.
After the court issues an order, we work to implement any required updates to trust records, retitle assets if necessary, and notify financial institutions so the trust can be administered according to the new terms. This may include preparing conforming amendments, updating certifications of trust, and recording documents with county offices where needed. Prompt implementation helps avoid administrative delays and ensures trustees can act with documented authority when managing or distributing trust assets.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request asking a judge to approve changes to a trust, to resolve ambiguities, or to confirm ownership of assets intended for the trust. It is used when the settlor cannot amend the trust privately due to incapacity, when parties disagree about the meaning of trust terms, or when assets were intended for the trust but lack clear title. The petition lays out the facts, legal grounds, and supporting evidence so the court can issue an order addressing the requested relief. The petition process requires identifying the trust, explaining the proposed changes or clarifying questions, and serving notice on interested parties. Evidence such as declarations, documentary proof of intent, or account statements may be necessary. The court evaluates the petition under applicable California law and issues an order that can validate, modify, or deny the requested changes. A well-prepared petition increases the likelihood of a timely and definitive resolution.
Yes, in many situations a trust can be changed without court involvement if the trust document explicitly permits amendment and the settlor has the capacity to sign any required amendment. When amendments are made while the settlor is capable, the update is typically straightforward and can avoid court expense and delay. Private amendments are appropriate for routine updates such as changing trustees, correcting clerical errors, or altering distribution instructions when the trust’s amendment provisions allow it. However, court involvement becomes necessary when the settlor lacks capacity, when beneficiaries or trustees contest the change, or when assets intended for the trust are not properly titled. In those situations, a petition provides a formal mechanism to obtain judicial authority to resolve disputes, confirm asset ownership, or validate changes that cannot be accomplished privately. Evaluating the trust language and the facts helps determine the appropriate route.
A Heggstad petition is a California-specific procedure used to ask the court to recognize that certain assets belong to a trust even though title or documentation does not show the trust as owner. This often occurs when a settlor intended to fund the trust but did not complete formal retitling. The petition requires demonstrating intent and supporting facts that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. The court examines the evidence and may declare the asset to be trust property for administration purposes. Heggstad petitions are often practical when preventing probate administration or when asset ownership questions would otherwise impede trust distribution. Supporting evidence may include declarations from the settlor or witnesses, account statements, and contemporaneous documents. Preparing a comprehensive record is important because the court’s decision turns on the demonstrated intent and surrounding circumstances.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on the complexity of the issues, the need for evidence gathering, local court schedules, and whether objections are filed. Simple, uncontested matters can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months after filing, while contested petitions that require discovery, extensive evidence, or multiple hearings can take longer. Local filing practices in Los Angeles County and Lancaster’s nearby courts also affect scheduling and processing times. Advance planning and thorough preparation often shorten the timeline by reducing surprises and minimizing the need for supplemental filings. Promptly serving interested parties, gathering complete documentation, and presenting a clear factual and legal record help move the petition forward. If objections arise, alternative dispute resolution or focused negotiation sometimes speeds resolution without prolonged litigation.
Yes, beneficiaries may object to a trust modification petition, and the court provides them an opportunity to be heard. Objections often focus on whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent, whether proper notice was given, or whether the requested modification unfairly affects beneficiary rights. When objections are raised, the court considers the evidence presented by all parties and determines whether the modification is justified under the law and facts. If an objection is anticipated, early communication and attempts to reach agreement can sometimes avoid contested hearings. When objections persist, preparing a strong factual record and addressing likely challenges in declarations and exhibits helps the court weigh competing positions. The goal in contested matters is to seek a resolution that the court finds consistent with legal standards and equitable considerations.
Modifying a trust can have implications for taxes and creditors, depending on the nature of the change and the type of trust involved. For revocable living trusts, changes typically do not create immediate income or gift tax consequences because the settlor retains control and tax liability remains with the settlor. For irrevocable trusts or transfers designed for asset protection or tax planning, modifications can have more significant tax and creditor implications and should be considered carefully. When substantial assets are involved, consulting tax advisers and reviewing creditor exposure is important before finalizing changes. A comprehensive review helps identify potential impacts, such as gift tax filing requirements or the effect on eligibility for public benefits. Coordinated planning among legal and financial professionals can reduce unintended consequences while achieving estate planning objectives.
Before seeking a modification, gather the original trust document and any amendments, the certification of trust if available, copies of deeds and account statements showing asset ownership, beneficiary designation forms for retirement and insurance accounts, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and any correspondence related to transfers or funding the trust. If a pour-over will exists, include that document as well. These records help establish the trust’s terms, asset titles, and any prior intentions regarding funding the trust. Also assemble documents supporting intent for transfers that are not clearly titled in the trust, such as contemporaneous letters, statements, or witness declarations. Complete documentation enables a thorough evaluation of whether a private amendment is possible or whether a petition such as a Heggstad filing is needed to bring assets under trust administration.
Costs to file a trust modification petition vary with the complexity of the matter, the need for evidence gathering, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested petitions that require minimal documentary support and no hearing are generally less expensive, while contested matters that require witness declarations, discovery, or multiple hearings will incur higher costs. Local court fees and costs for document recording or title transfers may also apply. Obtaining an early assessment helps estimate likely expenses and plan the most efficient approach. Where appropriate, exploring negotiation with beneficiaries or pursuing private amendment options can reduce out-of-pocket costs. For contested matters, a realistic budget plan and open communication about potential expenses help clients make informed decisions on how to proceed.
If the court denies a petition to modify a trust, the order will explain the reasons for denial and may suggest alternatives or conditions that could address the court’s concerns. Denial does not always foreclose other options; parties may consider negotiating a settlement, pursuing alternative remedies, or preparing a more detailed record to address the court’s objections. In some circumstances, an appeal may be available, but appeals require careful consideration of grounds and timelines. After a denial, revisiting the estate plan to identify nonlitigious ways to achieve objectives may be productive. For example, if the settlor retains capacity, private amendments may remain possible. If the issue involves asset titling, alternative transfer strategies or clarifying documents may resolve matters without further litigation. Discussing next steps in light of the court’s reasoning helps identify a realistic path forward.
Pour-over wills and certifications of trust commonly accompany trusts and affect how assets are identified and administered. A pour-over will directs that assets left outside the trust at death be transferred into the trust for distribution under its terms, while a certification of trust provides institutions with a summary of the trust’s existence and authority without disclosing the full trust. Both documents are often reviewed in a modification matter to ensure consistency across the estate plan and to confirm asset inclusion. When these documents indicate assets intended for the trust but title remains inconsistent, a petition such as a Heggstad filing or other court procedure may be necessary to confirm ownership. Reviewing pour-over provisions and certifications in tandem with the trust prevents conflicting instructions and supports a coherent administration plan that the court can rely on when approving any requested modifications.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas