A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool for beneficiaries and trustees when a trust fails to transfer assets as intended after a grantor’s death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist Littlerock and greater Los Angeles County residents with clear, practical steps to resolve trust transfer issues through the Heggstad process. This page explains what a Heggstad petition is, when it may be appropriate, and how the legal process typically unfolds. If you are facing a trust distribution concern, this overview will help you understand options and next steps without legal jargon or unnecessary complication.
Many families discover gaps when a trust administration does not accomplish the grantor’s intentions as expected. A Heggstad petition is a court action used in California to request that property be declared part of a decedent’s trust despite not having been formally transferred into the trust administration. This remedy can be especially important for preserving the trust plan, avoiding probate where possible, and ensuring assets pass to named beneficiaries. The discussion below covers common scenarios, potential benefits, and what to expect from the process so you can take informed action for your family’s estate matters.
A Heggstad petition serves to protect testamentary intent by asking the court to recognize that particular assets should be treated as trust property. This can prevent unnecessary probate, reduce delay in distribution, and preserve tax or creditor planning reflected in the trust documents. For beneficiaries and fiduciaries, pursuing a Heggstad petition can clarify title issues, remove uncertainty about asset ownership, and create a judicial record confirming the trust’s scope. When used appropriately, the petition helps families move forward with administration and distribution while maintaining the estate plan chosen by the deceased.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on estate planning, trust administration, and post-death trust issues such as Heggstad petitions. Our approach is to provide practical, clear guidance tailored to each family’s circumstances, drawing on years of experience handling trust-related courtroom and out-of-court resolutions. We prioritize communication, document review, and careful case preparation so clients understand their options and the likely outcomes. For Littlerock residents, we offer local knowledge of county procedures and reasonable, straightforward counsel to help resolve trust transfer disputes efficiently.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare certain property to be part of a deceased person’s trust despite apparent defects in formal transfer. Common triggers include assets titled in the decedent’s name alone, beneficiary designations that were not updated, or situations where the trust instrument clearly shows intent but paperwork is incomplete. Filing such a petition typically requires presenting the trust document, affidavits or testimony showing the decedent’s intent, and evidence of the connection between the asset and the trust plan. The court evaluates those facts and can order that the asset is treated as trust property.
Not every title issue requires a Heggstad petition; some matters can be resolved through administrative steps, transfers, or corrected documentation. When the parties disagree about whether an asset belongs to the trust or when third parties refuse to recognize trust claims, a petition provides a formal remedy. The process involves preparing pleadings, serving interested parties, and sometimes attending a hearing. The timeline varies with complexity and local court schedules. Understanding both the evidentiary standard and practical steps helps families weigh the benefits and potential cost and time involved in pursuing a petition.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California probate court asking the judge to declare that specific property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust. It is named after a reported case that established the remedy when trust property was never formally transferred but the deceased clearly intended to include it. The petition requires demonstrating the decedent’s intent and linking the property to the trust through documents, witness statements, or other evidence. When successful, the court’s order clarifies title and allows distribution under the trust without subjecting the property to full probate administration.
Important elements of a Heggstad petition include identifying the asset, proving the decedent’s intent for that asset to be included in the trust, and presenting supporting documentation to the court. Evidence may consist of the trust instrument, correspondence, declarations from persons familiar with the decedent’s intent, and any corporate or financial records that link the asset to the trust plan. The petition process also requires clear notice to beneficiaries and potentially affected parties, an opportunity for objections, and court review. Attorneys commonly prepare the petition, coordinate discovery if needed, and present arguments at hearing to obtain a declaratory order.
Understanding the terminology used in trust litigation and Heggstad matters helps you follow the process and communicate with fiduciaries, institutions, and counsel. Below are concise definitions of terms you will likely encounter, designed to demystify common phrases in pleadings and court discussions. A clearer grasp of this vocabulary aids decision making and ensures you know what documents and evidence to gather when pursuing a petition. Keep these terms handy as you review trust documents and prepare to discuss options with legal counsel or court staff.
A Heggstad petition is a court action in California seeking to treat property as trust property despite formal titling or transfer defects. The petition asks the probate court to declare the decedent intended the asset to be governed by the trust and to order distribution under trust terms rather than through probate. Filing such a petition typically involves sworn declarations, documentary evidence, and notice to interested persons. The court examines the presented evidence of intent and circumstance to decide whether to issue the requested declaratory relief.
Trust administration refers to the post-death process by which the trustee gathers assets, pays debts, and distributes trust property to beneficiaries according to the trust document. When assets are not properly titled or recognized as trust property, administration can be complicated. A Heggstad petition can be part of administration when a trustee needs judicial confirmation to include specific assets in the trust estate. Administration typically requires recordkeeping, notice to beneficiaries, and compliance with fiduciary duties and applicable state law.
A declaration of intent is evidence that the decedent intended certain assets to be part of the trust, which may include written statements, draft documents, or testimony from witnesses familiar with the decedent’s planning. In Heggstad matters, showing intent is often the central issue: the court evaluates whether the available evidence sufficiently connects the asset to the trust plan. Declarations of intent can come from the trustee, family members, or professionals who assisted with estate planning, and they help the judge determine whether to grant the petition.
Declaratory relief is a court-ordered statement that defines legal relationships or clarifies rights, such as declaring that an asset is owned by a trust. In a Heggstad petition the petitioner seeks declaratory relief so the court will officially recognize the trust’s interest in specified property. This remedy creates a judicial record that third parties, title companies, and financial institutions can rely upon when transferring or distributing assets. Declaratory relief reduces ambiguity and can expedite subsequent trust administration steps.
When property intended for a trust is not properly titled, several avenues may be available: administrative transfers with cooperation from third parties, corrective deeds or beneficiary changes, or filing a Heggstad petition to obtain a court declaration. Choosing the right route depends on whether parties agree, the type of asset involved, potential tax or creditor consequences, and how quickly a resolution is required. Administrative fixes may be faster when banks or title companies accept supporting affidavits, while contested matters or unwilling institutions often require a formal petition to secure a binding court decision.
If a financial institution, title company, or transfer agent accepts an affidavit, corrective deed, or supporting documentation that establishes the decedent’s intent, a full court petition may not be necessary. These administrative solutions depend on the willingness of third parties to rely on available paperwork and on beneficiaries’ agreement to the approach. For straightforward matters where ownership is clear and uncontested, this path can avoid court costs and expedite transfer. It remains important to confirm that the documents used provide adequate protection and do not create future disputes over title or distribution.
A limited approach often works when all beneficiaries and fiduciaries agree on the outcome and the asset can be retitled through nonjudicial means. Consensus among interested parties reduces the need for a Heggstad petition and can lead to efficient transfers or amendments that accomplish the trust’s intent. Even in these cases, careful documentation and clear signatures are needed to prevent later challenges. Confirming the legal effect of any private resolution with counsel helps ensure the transfer will be recognized by institutions and will not lead to unintended consequences for beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries, heirs, or third parties dispute whether an asset belongs to a trust, a formal court petition provides a binding resolution. Conflicts over title, inconsistent beneficiary designations, or refusal by institutions to retitle property can leave administration stalled and risks of competing claims. A petition clarifies ownership, creates official direction for transfer, and reduces the potential for future litigation. While court proceedings involve additional steps and cost, they ensure that the matter is resolved under judicial authority and provide a record that third parties and title professionals will accept.
Some situations hinge on reconciling ambiguous documents, draft instruments, or conflicting testimony about the decedent’s wishes. When evidence is contested or incomplete, the probate court is the venue to evaluate testimony, weigh documents, and issue an authoritative decision. The Heggstad petition process allows for discovery, sworn declarations, and hearings where the judge determines whether the asset should be integrated into the trust. This judicial evaluation is necessary when nonjudicial solutions cannot establish clear control over the property.
Taking a comprehensive approach to resolving trust transfer problems can reduce long-term risk, provide certainty to beneficiaries, and create a clear record for financial institutions and title companies. When matters are handled thoroughly, courts can issue orders that prevent future disputes, and trustees can proceed confidently with distribution. Comprehensive preparation includes reviewing relevant documents, obtaining declarations from knowledgeable witnesses, and anticipating potential objections so the petition proceeds efficiently. This methodical preparation often leads to smoother administration and fewer surprises down the road.
A comprehensive strategy also helps preserve the grantor’s estate plan by addressing tax, creditor, and family considerations that might otherwise be overlooked. The process of compiling evidence and presenting a petition helps ensure that the court order aligns with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s demonstrated intent. For families concerned about timing, coordination with institutions and clear court orders can speed title transfers and distribution while minimizing the chance of additional litigation. Thoughtful legal planning supports a durable resolution that beneficiaries can rely upon.
A central benefit of pursuing a complete legal remedy is achieving clear title and an authoritative court declaration that an asset is trust property. This certainty makes it easier for trustees to distribute assets and for institutions to accept transfers without fearing later challenges. Clear title reduces delays and helps avoid separate disputes over ownership that could arise years later. By addressing potential objections early and securing a court order, families create a reliable path to carry out the trust’s provisions and protect beneficiaries’ interests with a defensible legal record.
When a court issues declaratory relief confirming that property is part of the trust, that ruling reduces the risk of later challenges from heirs, creditors, or other interested parties. The judicial record provides evidence that can be used to satisfy title companies, banks, and retirement plan administrators. This protection supports orderly administration by limiting the grounds for subsequent disputes over distribution. While the process requires care and attention, the resulting stability often outweighs the initial effort, especially in larger or more complex estates where uncertainty could be costly.
Collecting all relevant documents at the outset makes the Heggstad petition process more efficient. This includes the trust instrument and any amendments, wills, deeds, beneficiary designations, financial account statements, and correspondence that reflect the decedent’s intent. Also gather records showing how the asset was managed and any draft instruments or notes that reference the trust. Early organization helps clarify issues, reduces the need for discovery, and provides the evidence judges look for when assessing whether an asset should be treated as part of the trust.
Maintaining clear, documented communication with beneficiaries and potential interested parties reduces the chance of contested litigation and speeds resolution. Explain the reason for any petition or corrective action, share relevant documents, and invite questions so misunderstandings can be addressed early. When family members are informed and aligned on the approach, administrative fixes may be possible; when disagreements exist, early communication helps clarify positions and may narrow contested issues, easing the path to a focused court hearing if necessary.
You might consider a Heggstad petition if assets intended to fund a trust were not properly retitled, if beneficiary designations conflict with trust terms, or when institutions refuse to recognize trust claims. The petition is also appropriate when private remedies are unavailable or when there is a risk of probate if the matter remains unresolved. Families often pursue this remedy to preserve the grantor’s estate plan, avoid unintended distributions, and achieve a definitive judicial ruling that clears title and allows timely administration and distribution under the trust.
Consider this service when disputes arise among heirs, when clear documentation of intent exists but formal transfer is incomplete, or when there is uncertainty about how a particular asset should be administered. A court order can prevent future contest and provide a stable record for institutions handling transfers. For trustees who need authority to move forward and for beneficiaries seeking clarity, the petition offers a formal path to resolve ownership issues and implement the trust’s provisions without resorting to full probate litigation when a trust-based solution better reflects the decedent’s plan.
Typical scenarios include real property left in the decedent’s name and not deeded into the trust, bank or investment accounts still titled in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts with outdated beneficiary designations, and assets that were intended to be covered by a pour-over will but were never transferred. Other circumstances include disputes among family members about the decedent’s wishes or institutions refusing to rely on nonjudicial documents. In these situations, a petition seeks judicial recognition so the trust plan can be carried out as intended.
Real estate that remained in the decedent’s individual name at death is a frequent cause for a Heggstad petition, especially when the trust document indicates the property was to be held in trust. Mortgages, deed records, and title objections can complicate transfer. A petition asks the court to declare the property part of the trust so the trustee can manage or distribute it under trust terms. Resolving such matters avoids full probate and helps ensure that the decedent’s intentions for the property are honored when straightforward title transfers are not available.
Retirement or insurance accounts with beneficiary designations inconsistent with the trust plan can create ambiguity at death. If the decedent clearly intended the asset to fund the trust, a Heggstad petition can provide the court with evidence to align the asset with the trust, subject to applicable rules for designated accounts. These matters often require careful review of plan documents and consideration of contract language, but a court order reflecting the decedent’s intent can facilitate transfer and reduce disputes among potential payees or beneficiaries.
When a decedent updated estate planning documents but neglected to retitle assets or to follow through on administrative changes, gaps can occur that interfere with trust administration. Whether due to oversight or changing circumstances, such title issues can leave intended trust assets in limbo. A Heggstad petition helps address those gaps by demonstrating to the court how the decedent intended their estate plan to operate and seeking an order that treats the affected assets as part of the trust for distribution purposes.
For Littlerock and Los Angeles County residents, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers guidance on trust transfer issues and Heggstad petition options. We help clients gather necessary documentation, communicate with institutions, and prepare the petition when court intervention is required. Our goal is to resolve title and distribution questions efficiently while keeping families informed at every stage. If you need help determining whether a petition is appropriate or want assistance preparing a strong factual record to support trust inclusion, local counsel can provide practical next steps tailored to your situation.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we focus on clear legal guidance for estate and trust matters, including Heggstad petitions. We emphasize thorough document review, careful fact gathering, and tailored communication so clients understand options and likely outcomes. Our representation aims to be pragmatic and cost-conscious, helping clients pursue administrative solutions when available and preparing robust petitions when court action is necessary. This practical approach helps families navigate what can be an emotional and complex process with steady legal support and attention to detail.
We prioritize collaboration with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions to resolve title problems while minimizing delay. When a petition is required, we prepare clear pleadings, coordinate evidence, and present a focused case to the probate court. Our attorneys are experienced in managing discovery, objections, and hearings that commonly arise in trust inclusion matters. Clients receive regular updates and a plan that balances efficiency with the need to secure a durable judicial ruling that preserves the decedent’s plan and protects beneficiary interests.
Our office assists with related documents commonly encountered in trust matters, such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and powers of attorney. We work to identify potential title or beneficiary issues early, which can reduce conflict and cost. If litigation becomes necessary, we prepare a focused case that emphasizes the decedent’s demonstrated intent, aiming for a resolution that returns assets to the trust administration and allows distribution according to the trust terms while avoiding unnecessary litigation where possible.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and asset records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed and whether nonjudicial remedies exist. We then help clients gather declarations and documentary evidence, communicate with institutions, and attempt administrative resolution if appropriate. When court action is needed, we prepare and file the petition, provide required notices, respond to any objections, and present the case at hearing. Throughout, we keep clients informed and focused on achieving a practical outcome consistent with the trust.
The first step is a careful assessment of the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or notes evidencing the decedent’s intent. This review identifies the assets in question, assesses the strength of available evidence, and determines whether institutions might accept corrective documentation without court involvement. By establishing a clear factual record early, we can advise on likely success, anticipated timeline, and whether to pursue an administrative path or prepare a Heggstad petition for filing in probate court.
We assist in collecting all relevant records, including copies of the trust and amendments, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, beneficiary forms, and any communications that reflect the decedent’s planning. We also help identify and prepare declarations from witnesses who can describe the decedent’s intent. These materials form the foundation for a petition or for convincing third parties to accept transfers. Organized evidence streamlines the process and helps the court or institution evaluate the claim more quickly and favorably.
Before filing a petition, we explore whether banks, title companies, or plan administrators will accept affidavits, corrective deeds, or other documentation to retitle property. If institutions will cooperate, this can avoid court intervention and save time and cost. We prepare the requested paperwork, coordinate signatures, and ensure that any administrative route provides sufficient legal protection. When institutions decline to assist, these efforts help demonstrate the need for a Heggstad petition and clarify the factual record in court filings.
If court action is necessary, we draft and file the Heggstad petition in the appropriate probate court, setting forth the factual basis for inclusion of the asset in the trust. The filing includes supporting declarations and documentary evidence. We ensure that all required parties and potential interested persons receive formal notice of the petition, giving them an opportunity to respond. Proper notice and careful preparation of pleadings reduce procedural risk and help the court address the matter on the merits.
Preparation involves drafting a clear petition that identifies the assets, explains the factual basis for inclusion in the trust, and attaches the trust instrument and supporting records. Declarations from witnesses and copies of relevant documents are included to create a persuasive evidentiary showing. The pleadings explain why declaratory relief is warranted under California law and request an order that the property be treated as trust property, enabling the trustee to proceed with administration and distribution.
After filing, formal notice must be provided to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties so they can object if they choose. We coordinate service and monitor responses, addressing any procedural objections and resolving disputes when possible. If objections are raised, we work to narrow contested issues through exchange of documents and, when needed, prepared testimony. Clear procedural handling preserves the strength of the petition and helps the court focus on the key factual questions about the decedent’s intent and asset connection to the trust.
The final step is typically a court hearing where the judge reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections. We present declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument demonstrating that the asset should be treated as trust property. The judge may issue an order declaring the property part of the trust, which creates the judicial basis for retitling and distribution. Where disputes remain, hearings may be contested, but clear preparation and persuasive presentation increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution consistent with the decedent’s documented intent.
During hearing preparation we organize evidence to show the decedent’s intention and the asset’s connection to the trust. Sworn declarations, copies of the trust and related documents, and witness testimony are organized to present a coherent narrative to the judge. Careful preparation helps the judge evaluate credibility and factual links between the asset and the trust terms. A focused presentation of these materials supports a judicial declaration that streamlines subsequent trust administration and clarifies title for institutions.
If the court grants the petition, it issues an order declaring the asset to be part of the trust, which trustees and institutions can rely upon for retitling or distribution. We assist in implementing the court order, coordinating with title companies, banks, and other entities to complete transfers. The court’s declaration provides a durable remedy that reduces the likelihood of future disputes. After implementation, trustees can continue trust administration with the confidence that the asset is legally recognized as trust property.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing in California that asks the judge to declare that specific property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite defects in formal transfer or title. It is used when the trust instrument and surrounding facts demonstrate that the decedent intended the asset to be governed by the trust, but the asset was never properly retitled or otherwise documented as trust property. The petition seeks declaratory relief so the trustee can administer and distribute the asset according to the trust terms without resorting to full probate. A petition is appropriate when administrative corrections are not possible or when third parties refuse to accept nonjudicial evidence of intent. The petitioner must present a clear factual record linking the asset to the trust, including the trust document, relevant account or deed records, and witness declarations that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. If the court is persuaded, it will issue an order that clarifies ownership and allows the trustee to proceed with distribution under the trust.
The duration of a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the case, the responsiveness of interested parties, and the local court’s schedule. Simple, uncontested matters where institutions agree to administrative fixes can be resolved in weeks, while contested petitions that require discovery and hearing can take several months. Timeframes also depend on how quickly documentary evidence and witness declarations can be assembled and served on interested persons. To improve efficiency, early document gathering and proactive communication with institutions and beneficiaries are helpful. Where there are objections, additional time may be needed for briefing, hearings, and possible settlement discussions. Your attorney can provide an estimated timeline after reviewing the facts and assessing the potential for administrative resolution versus court intervention.
A Heggstad petition can help avoid probate for a particular asset by getting a judicial declaration that the asset is trust property, which allows the trustee to manage and distribute it under the trust rather than through probate proceedings. This remedy is particularly useful when the decedent clearly intended the asset to be part of the trust but formal title was never corrected before death. When the court issues an order, financial institutions and title companies generally accept the ruling and proceed with transfers consistent with the trust. However, the petition itself is a court process and does involve probate court procedures. While it can prevent an asset from being administered through a full probate estate, it still requires filing in the probate court for judicial determination. The overall effect is often to preserve the trust framework and avoid a broader probate administration for the specific asset in question.
Evidence to support a Heggstad petition commonly includes the trust document and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and correspondence that indicate the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from people who can testify about the decedent’s planning or conversations, as well as records showing attempts to retitle or otherwise treat the asset as trust property, strengthen the case. The more direct and contemporaneous the evidence of intent, the stronger the petition will appear to the judge. In addition to documentary proof, testimony or affidavits from trustees, family members, or professionals who assisted with planning can help establish the connection between the asset and the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be integrated into the trust, so thorough preparation and organized presentation are important.
A court order obtained through a Heggstad petition is generally persuasive to banks, title companies, and other institutions and can resolve disputes regarding whether an asset should be treated as trust property. Institutions that previously declined to retitle assets may accept the probate court’s declaratory order as definitive authority to transfer or distribute the property according to the trust. This judicial backing helps clear administrative roadblocks and gives trustees clear direction for moving forward with trust administration. Before filing, attempting to resolve problems administratively with institutions is often advisable, since cooperation can avoid court proceedings. If institutions refuse to cooperate, documenting those efforts and presenting that evidence in the petition supports the need for judicial relief and demonstrates to the court that a formal order is warranted to resolve the dispute.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include administrative corrections such as corrective deeds, affidavits of trust, or beneficiary designation updates when institutions are willing to accept such documentation. If all interested parties agree, a private resolution can sometimes retitle assets or accomplish transfers without court intervention. These measures can be faster and less costly but require cooperation from employers, plan administrators, banks, or title companies. When institutions decline to accept corrective documents or when interested parties disagree, these alternatives are insufficient. In those cases the petition provides a formal judicial avenue to obtain a binding declaration that the asset is trust property. Consulting with counsel early helps determine whether an administrative fix is realistic or whether a court filing is the safest path.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must provide notice to beneficiaries, heirs, creditors when appropriate, and any other interested parties identified under probate rules. Proper notice ensures due process and gives others an opportunity to object. The court’s local rules specify who must be notified and how service must be made. Ensuring accurate notice is essential to avoid procedural defects that could delay or invalidate the petition’s outcome. If parties object after receiving notice, the court will consider their objections and the supporting evidence. Advance communication and offering mediation or settlement discussions can sometimes narrow disputes before hearing. Where objections remain, the court will adjudicate based on the submitted evidence and legal arguments.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary with case complexity, attorney fees, filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Simple matters that proceed uncontested may involve modest filing fees and reasonable attorney time for document preparation and coordination with institutions. Contested petitions that require discovery, multiple hearings, or extended attorney involvement naturally incur higher costs. The specific fee range depends on how much preparation and litigation are required to present a persuasive factual record to the court. Many clients find it helpful to request a cost estimate after an initial review so they can weigh the potential expense against the benefit of obtaining a binding court order. In some cases, administrative alternatives can reduce cost, but when a durable judicial resolution is necessary, the potential expense is often justified by the reduced risk of future dispute and clearer title for trust administration.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will schedule proceedings to consider evidence and legal argument from both sides. Objections can raise factual disputes about the decedent’s intent or procedural concerns about notice or standing. When objections are raised, the parties may exchange documents, submit declarations, and present testimony at a hearing so the judge can evaluate credibility and determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property under the law. Resolving objections may involve negotiation or limited discovery to clarify disputed facts. If objections cannot be resolved consensually, the court will decide based on the evidence presented. Proper preparation and a focused presentation of the decedent’s intent can persuade the court to grant declaratory relief despite objections.
Yes, a trustee may file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust to clarify that certain property is part of the trust estate and to obtain an order authorizing administration or distribution. Trustees have a duty to protect trust assets and to act in beneficiaries’ interests; when title problems impede administration, seeking a court declaration can be an appropriate fiduciary action. The trustee must follow procedural rules for notice and demonstrate the factual basis for including the asset in the trust. In some circumstances beneficiaries or other interested parties may also be petitioners, particularly if the trustee is unwilling to act. Regardless of who files, the court will assess the merits of the petition based on evidence of the decedent’s intent and applicable law. Clear documentation and careful procedural compliance help the trustee fulfill duties while pursuing a durable outcome for the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas