A Heggstad Petition can be an important legal tool when assets titled in an individual’s name should instead be treated as trust assets after their death or incapacity. Many families encounter this issue when a trustmaker intended to move assets into a living trust but left property or accounts titled incorrectly. Our Lomita practice helps clients understand the petition process, the legal standards courts apply, and what outcomes to expect. We focus on clear communication, timely filings, and protecting your family’s financial and estate planning goals while navigating California law and local court procedures.
This guide explains what a Heggstad Petition seeks to accomplish, when it is appropriate, and how it fits into broader estate planning and trust administration efforts. It will outline the typical steps involved in proving that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust and describe common evidentiary approaches used in probate court. Whether you are a trustee, successor trustee, beneficiary, or family member, understanding the petition process can help you decide how to proceed and whether court intervention is likely to be necessary to transfer assets to the trust.
A Heggstad Petition can restore the intended distribution of trust assets when administrative mistakes or incomplete transfers have left property outside the trust. The petition provides a legal pathway to have a court recognize certain assets as belonging to the trust despite the absence of formal retitling. For families and trustees, this can prevent assets from being delayed in probate, reduce disputes among beneficiaries, and align distributions with the trustmaker’s documented wishes. Effectively pursuing a petition requires careful collection of evidence and a clear presentation of the trustmaker’s intent and the facts surrounding the asset’s titling.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles a range of estate planning and trust administration matters for clients throughout Los Angeles County and the broader California area. Our approach emphasizes personalized service, timely communication, and practical legal solutions tailored to each client’s circumstances. We assist with petitions, trust administration documents, and coordination with financial institutions and courts, working to minimize stress and delay for families. If court filings are necessary to transfer assets into a trust, we prepare documentation, gather supporting evidence, and represent trustees in probate proceedings when needed.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing under California law intended to establish that certain assets held in an individual’s name should be treated as trust property. The petition typically argues that the decedent or trustmaker intended to transfer the asset to their trust but did not complete formal retitling. The court examines the trust document, surrounding facts, and available evidence to determine whether the asset should be considered part of the trust. This process can be essential to ensure distributions follow the trust’s terms and to avoid unnecessary probate steps and delays in administering the estate.
The petition process varies depending on the asset type, the clarity of supporting documentation, and whether interested parties contest the petition. Evidence can include the trust instrument, account statements, beneficiary designations, declarations, communications indicating intent, and testimony from witnesses. Courts weigh the totality of the circumstances to determine intent. Filing a petition can resolve title issues, allow the trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust, and reduce the risk of assets being incorrectly subjected to probate distribution rules.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to recognize that assets titled in an individual’s name were intended as trust property and therefore should be distributed under the trust’s terms. Awarded under California precedent, the petition requires proof that the trustmaker intended the transfer, even if the formal steps to retitle the asset were not completed. The petition explains the factual basis for that intent and requests an order to treat the asset as trust property. When successful, the petition streamlines trust administration by clarifying ownership and avoiding separate probate proceedings for the contested assets.
Courts focus on several central elements when reviewing a Heggstad Petition, including the trust document’s terms, the decedent’s or trustmaker’s intent, the asset’s history and documentation, and any actions taken that indicate an intent to fund the trust. Evidence such as correspondence, draft documents, bank or title company communications, and consistent estate planning patterns can support the petition. The process also involves preparing pleadings, providing notice to interested persons, and potentially presenting testimony at hearings to demonstrate that the asset should be treated as having been transferred into the trust.
Understanding common terms used in trust and probate contexts makes it easier to follow the petition process. This glossary explains phrases such as trustmaker, trustee, probate, retitling, pour-over will, and intestacy. Knowing these definitions helps clarify the legal roles involved and the consequences of assets being titled outside a trust. Clear terminology can also assist trustees and beneficiaries when gathering evidence and communicating with financial institutions, counsel, and the court during petition preparation.
A trustmaker is the individual who creates a trust and sets out how assets are to be managed and distributed. In the context of a Heggstad Petition, the trustmaker’s intent and documented instructions are central to proving that certain assets should be treated as trust property. Evidence of the trustmaker’s consistent planning or direct communications about moving property into the trust strengthens the argument that retained title was unintended. Understanding the trustmaker’s role is essential when determining whether assets should be transferred to the trust through court order.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a deceased person’s estate when assets are not held in a trust or otherwise transferred by beneficiary designation. One purpose of a Heggstad Petition is to avoid unnecessary probate for assets that the trustmaker intended to be trust property. When an asset is successfully recognized as part of a trust, it typically bypasses probate and follows the trust’s distribution instructions. Probate procedures include validating wills, identifying assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing assets to heirs according to law when no trust governs those assets.
Retitling is the process of changing the ownership designation on an asset so it is held in the name of a trust rather than an individual. Failure to complete retitling is a common reason that a Heggstad Petition becomes necessary. Documents, account forms, deeds, or beneficiary designations may show whether retitling was intended but not finished. Evidence of steps taken toward retitling, such as pledge forms, draft deeds, or communications with banks or title companies, can support a petition to have the asset treated as trust property despite the lack of formal transfer.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s individual name at death to be transferred into their living trust. While a pour-over will helps capture assets not retitled before death, assets passing under a pour-over will typically must go through probate. A Heggstad Petition can instead establish trust ownership for specific assets, potentially avoiding probate for those items and allowing the trustee to administer them under the trust’s terms rather than through court-supervised probate distribution.
When assets are improperly titled, families and trustees consider several paths: filing a Heggstad Petition to have assets recognized as trust property, proceeding through formal probate using a will or intestacy, or handling matters informally if institutions accept the trust’s claims. Each option has tradeoffs related to time, cost, privacy, and finality. Petitions can be more efficient than full probate for discrete assets, but they require evidence and court approval. Choosing the right approach depends on the asset type, the strength of supporting documentation, potential disagreements among heirs, and the client’s goals for timely distribution and privacy.
A targeted Heggstad Petition may be appropriate when there is clear documentary evidence showing the trustmaker intended to fund the trust. Documentation might include drafts of deeds, account forms, correspondence with financial institutions, or consistent estate planning documents reflecting the same intent. When such evidence is strong, a court is more likely to accept the petition without protracted litigation. Pursuing a limited petition for a specific asset can be cost-effective and preserve privacy by avoiding a broader probate administration when only a few items are affected.
A focused approach can work well when interested parties are largely in agreement or when potential challengers are unlikely to contest the asset’s inclusion in the trust. If beneficiaries and trustees share an understanding of the trustmaker’s intent, the judge can often resolve title issues based on submitted evidence and declarations. This reduces the time and expense compared to full probate. However, even when a limited approach is suitable, complete and well-organized evidence remains essential to obtain a favorable court ruling and to facilitate the trustee’s ability to manage and distribute the asset.
A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when multiple assets have incorrect titles or when ownership involves complex structures such as joint accounts, business interests, or property in multiple jurisdictions. Coordinating retitling, beneficiary updates, and court petitions requires careful planning and consistent legal strategy. Broader representation helps ensure that all affected assets are identified, that legal steps are taken in the most efficient order, and that related matters such as creditor claims and tax implications are addressed to reduce the likelihood of future disputes or unexpected liabilities.
When beneficiaries or other interested persons contest the trustmaker’s intent or the proposed transfer of assets to a trust, a more comprehensive legal response is often required. This may include preparing for contested hearings, conducting discovery, gathering witness testimony, and coordinating multiple court filings. Robust representation also helps protect the trustee’s duties and the trust’s terms while working to resolve disputes efficiently. Comprehensive representation aims to preserve assets and achieve outcomes consistent with the trustmaker’s documented plan despite disagreements.
A comprehensive approach to resolving title issues can reduce the risk of overlooked assets, inconsistent filings, and future challenges. By auditing the decedent’s estate plan, coordinating with financial institutions, and filing appropriate petitions, the trustee can consolidate administration under the trust and follow the trustmaker’s instructions. This approach also supports efficient distribution, helps protect family relationships by minimizing surprises, and addresses tax and creditor matters proactively. Comprehensive planning provides a structured pathway from identifying issues to obtaining court orders and completing distributions.
Handling Heggstad Petitions as part of a broader estate administration plan can preserve time and reduce cumulative costs compared with addressing each asset in isolation. Consolidating legal tasks allows for coordinated documentation gathering and unified court filings, which courts often find persuasive. It also makes it easier to address related matters such as funding pour-over wills, updating records, and preparing final accounting for beneficiaries. Overall, the full-service route aims to provide clarity, reduce delays, and secure the trustmaker’s intended legacy for the family.
Addressing title issues and trust funding comprehensively can cut down on administrative delays caused by fragmented actions or overlooked documents. Timely petitions and coordinated communication with banks and title companies streamline access to assets, enabling trustees to manage expenses and distributions promptly. This continuity helps beneficiaries receive their intended support and reduces the likelihood that important bills or obligations will be missed. A cohesive plan also supports a smoother transition of asset control from the individual to the trustee for proper management under the trust terms.
A full-service approach helps minimize future disputes by ensuring all relevant assets are considered and by documenting the reasons underlying trust funding decisions. When courts see a well-supported petition and a thorough administration plan, they are better positioned to grant orders that settle title questions and limit grounds for future challenges. Proper notice to interested parties, clear accounting, and comprehensive filings create a transparent record that protects trustees and beneficiaries, and contributes to long-term peace of mind for families seeking to honor the trustmaker’s intentions.
Collect all documents that reflect the trustmaker’s intent to transfer assets to the trust, including the trust instrument, draft deeds, account change forms, and relevant correspondence. Statements from financial institutions or title companies about attempted transfers can be particularly helpful. Organize these materials chronologically and prepare a clear narrative explaining why each asset was meant to be part of the trust. Well-prepared documentation often reduces the need for contested proceedings and strengthens the petition by providing the judge with a coherent factual record to evaluate.
Engage banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators early to determine what documentation they require to transfer accounts or property to a trust. Some institutions accept a Heggstad Petition or related court order as sufficient to change account ownership, while others have specific forms and processing timelines. Proactive communication can prevent delays and unnecessary filings. Request written confirmation of any steps taken or requirements communicated by the institution to include as supporting evidence with the petition or to guide subsequent administrative tasks.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in an individual’s name, when a pour-over will alone would subject property to probate, or when the trustee lacks clear authority to manage those assets. The petition may be necessary to align legal title with the trustmaker’s documented wishes and to enable trustees to carry out distributions without lengthy probate procedures. Addressing these title issues promptly can prevent wasted time, added legal fees, and family tension that arises from unclear ownership or delays in accessing funds needed for expenses and distributions.
You should also consider a petition if you encounter financial institutions or recorders that will not accept trust claims without a court order. Situations involving jointly held assets, real property with title irregularities, or outdated beneficiary designations can particularly benefit from a formal petition. Filing a Heggstad Petition may be the most efficient legal step to establish trust ownership, permitting the trustee to perform their duties and preserving the estate plan’s goals. Early legal review helps identify whether a petition or alternate remedies are best suited to your situation.
Typical scenarios include real property with deeds still in the deceased’s name, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled to the trust, retirement accounts with outdated beneficiary forms, and transfers that were intended but not completed prior to the trustmaker’s death. Administrative oversights, last-minute changes, or misunderstanding of retitling procedures can all create circumstances where petitioning the court becomes necessary. Identifying these circumstances early and gathering supporting evidence helps streamline the petition and improves the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
Real estate is a common asset that remains in an individual’s name after the trustmaker’s death, especially when deeds were not executed or recorded before death. In such cases, a Heggstad Petition can ask the court to recognize that the property was intended to be trust property, allowing the trustee to administer or distribute it under the trust. Supporting evidence might include the trust document, communications with title companies about retitling, or drafts of deeds. The petition process helps avoid a separate probate proceeding for that property when trust ownership can be established.
Bank and brokerage accounts are often overlooked during funding of a living trust, leaving them titled in the trustmaker’s name. Institutions may refuse to transfer assets without a court order when account ownership is disputed or unclear. A Heggstad Petition can provide the court’s recognition that the accounts were intended for the trust and authorize the trustee to access and manage funds. Gathering account statements, change forms, and any correspondence indicating attempted transfers supports the petition and helps the trustee bring those assets under trust control.
Retirement plan accounts and life insurance policies sometimes have outdated beneficiary designations or conflicting paperwork that does not reflect the trustmaker’s overall estate plan. While many retirement accounts pass by beneficiary designation, mismatches between those forms and the trust can complicate administration. A Heggstad Petition may be needed when account records suggest an intent to include the asset in the trust or when retitling steps were initiated but incomplete. Carefully documenting communications with plan administrators and review of plan paperwork can be vital to resolving these matters in court.
If you are dealing with assets that should have been part of a trust but remain titled individually, our Lomita area practice can evaluate the facts and advise on whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate. We assist trustees and families in collecting evidence, preparing pleadings, and navigating court procedures to seek recognition of the trustmaker’s intent. Timely action and organized documentation are important to achieving an efficient resolution. Contact us to discuss your situation and learn about next steps to align asset ownership with the trust’s terms and minimize administration delays.
Filing a Heggstad Petition involves careful factual presentation and compliance with probate court procedures. Legal counsel helps ensure filings meet court standards, that notice is properly given to interested persons, and that supporting evidence is organized for the judge’s review. Counsel also coordinates with institutions that hold the assets and advises trustees on interim asset management and distribution decisions. This coordination reduces the risk of procedural mistakes that could delay court action or weaken the petition’s persuasiveness.
Beyond filing the petition, legal counsel can assist with gathering testimony, drafting declarations, and negotiating with potential objectors when disagreements arise. Counsel can also advise trustees about fiduciary duties and documentation for accounting and distribution to beneficiaries. Counsel’s role includes preparing clear legal arguments that reflect the trustmaker’s documented plan and presenting those facts to the court in a way that supports a favorable ruling to treat assets as trust property.
Working with counsel experienced in trust administration and probate filings helps trustees navigate timelines and statutory requirements while focusing on the practical needs of beneficiaries. Counsel can often anticipate common issues institutions raise and address them proactively, which can shorten delays in accessing accounts or transferring title. Ultimately, legal guidance aims to protect the trust’s integrity and to enable the trustee to carry out distributions consistent with the trustmaker’s intentions.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust document, the assets in question, and available records indicating the trustmaker’s intent. We then advise on evidence to collect and draft the necessary petition and supporting declarations. We coordinate service and notice to interested parties and respond to any inquiries from institutions or potential objectors. If a hearing is necessary, we prepare a clear presentation of facts and evidence for the court. Throughout, we keep trustees informed about timelines and administrative steps needed to secure trust ownership.
The first step involves thoroughly reviewing the trust, wills, deeds, account records, and any communications that shed light on the trustmaker’s intent. We identify assets likely affected and outline documentation that strengthens a petition. This may include draft transfer documents, beneficiary designations, records of attempted transfers, and witness statements. Early attention to evidence reduces the chance of surprises later and often streamlines the petition process by presenting a coherent factual narrative for court consideration.
Collecting trust documents, account statements, and any communications with financial institutions is foundational. These records help show the trustmaker’s plan and whether steps toward retitling were taken. We will request copies of deeds, bank statements, brokerage records, and correspondence indicating funding attempts. Organizing these materials in a logical order supports the petition narrative and allows us to identify any gaps that may need supplementary evidence or declarations from persons with firsthand knowledge.
Interviewing individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s intent and preparing sworn declarations can be persuasive for the court. Declarations from successors, family members, and professionals who discussed funding the trust help corroborate documentary evidence. We assist in drafting clear, factual declarations that explain the circumstances and efforts undertaken to transfer assets to the trust. These statements, when combined with records, develop a compelling account of how and why the asset should be recognized as part of the trust.
After assembling evidence and preparing supporting declarations, we prepare and file the Heggstad Petition with the appropriate probate court. The filing includes legal argument, exhibits, and a proposed order. Statutory notice requirements must be met, and we ensure all interested parties receive proper notice to allow them an opportunity to respond. Timely and accurate notice is essential to the court’s consideration and to protecting the process from procedural challenges that could delay resolution.
Drafting the petition requires clear presentation of the trust, the asset’s history, and the evidence reflecting the trustmaker’s intent. We assemble exhibits such as account records, draft deeds, and declarations into an organized filing package. The petition explains the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property and proposes a court order that allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust. Well-prepared exhibits help the court evaluate the petition efficiently and make informed rulings.
Following filing, the petition must be served on interested persons according to statutory requirements, which may include beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. We coordinate service and monitor for any responses or objections. If objections arise, we work to address them through negotiation, additional documentation, or court briefing. Managing responses promptly helps maintain momentum in the case and can lead to resolution of issues before a contested hearing becomes necessary.
If the court requires a hearing, we prepare to present declarations, exhibits, and factual testimony that support the petition. The judge evaluates the evidence and, if persuaded, issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property. After an order is entered, we assist with presenting the order to financial institutions or recording the order to effect title changes. Post-order steps include coordinating transfers, updating trust inventories, and advising trustees on distribution and accounting obligations under the trust’s terms.
At any required hearing, we present the documentary record and witness declarations that establish the trustmaker’s intent. Our preparation focuses on a concise factual narrative supported by exhibits, so the court can readily determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. If objections exist, we address legal and factual issues through argument and evidentiary presentation. A well-structured hearing often leads to an order that clarifies title and permits the trustee to manage and distribute the asset as the trust directs.
After the court grants relief, implementing the order involves presenting it to institutions to effect account transfers or recording it for real property. We assist trustees with the administrative steps required to bring assets fully under trust control, including obtaining replacement titles, redirecting payments, and documenting transactions in the trust inventory. Completing these steps helps ensure the trustee complies with fiduciary duties and that beneficiaries receive distributions consistent with the trustmaker’s intent without unnecessary delay.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing seeking recognition that specific assets titled in an individual’s name should be treated as trust property because the trustmaker intended those assets to be part of the trust. The petition asks a probate court to examine the trust, the asset’s history, and any supporting evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the circumstances, including documents and witness statements, to determine whether formal recognition of the asset as trust property is appropriate. Petitions are commonly used when attempts to retitle assets were not completed before death or incapacity, when institutions will not accept the trustee’s claim without an order, or when clear documentary evidence supports the trustmaker’s intent but title remains inconsistent. A successful petition allows the trustee to administer or distribute the asset under the trust without separate probate for that specific asset, simplifying administration when supported by adequate evidence and proper procedures.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition depends on the asset type, the quality of supporting evidence, the court’s calendar, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In straightforward cases with strong documentation and no objections, the process can be completed in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on local court schedules. When additional discovery, witness declarations, or hearings are required, the matter can take longer as parties prepare and the court sets hearing dates. If objections arise, preparation for contested hearings and potential discovery responses can extend the timeline significantly. Coordination with financial institutions or title companies to implement the court order may also add administrative time after the court issues relief. Prompt evidence collection and clear communication with interested persons can help expedite the process and reduce delays where possible.
Strong documentary evidence tends to be most persuasive in Heggstad matters. Examples include the trust instrument itself, draft deeds or account change forms, correspondence with banks or title companies reflecting attempted transfers, and contemporaneous notes or emails indicating the trustmaker’s intention. Statements from professionals who advised the trustmaker or from family members with firsthand knowledge can also reinforce the documentary record when presented as sworn declarations to the court. Bank and title company communications that show attempts to retitle assets or instructions to transfer to the trust are particularly useful. Combining these records with witness declarations that explain the context and intent provides a coherent narrative the judge can evaluate. Consistency among documents and testimony strengthens the petition and reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings.
A successful Heggstad Petition will cause a court to recognize the specified asset as trust property for the purpose of administration and distribution under the trust. In many cases, this avoids full probate for the particular asset. However, whether the petition entirely prevents probate depends on the asset type and other estate circumstances. Assets that are recognized as trust property under the petition are generally administered under the trust rather than through probate, reducing the need for separate probate proceedings related to those items. That said, some assets may still require additional administrative steps even after a court order, such as recording the order for real estate or meeting institution-specific requirements for account transfers. The petition primarily addresses title recognition; implementation may involve supplementary actions to fully transfer control and ensure distributions follow the trust terms.
California law requires notice to interested persons when filing petitions that affect property rights in probate matters. Typically, this includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs, known creditors, trustees, and anyone else with a legally protected interest in the asset. The exact notice requirements depend on the court rules and the petition’s scope. Proper and timely service of notice is essential to ensure the petition is procedurally sound and not subject to challenge based on inadequate notice. Failure to provide required notice can delay proceedings and may require refiling or corrective service steps. For this reason, careful identification of interested parties and adherence to statutory deadlines and methods of service help protect the petition process. Counsel can assist in determining who must be noticed and how to document service effectively for the court.
Financial institutions and title companies sometimes impose additional administrative requirements even after a court grants a Heggstad order. For example, a bank may request certified copies of the order, proof of the trustee’s authority, or completion of the institution’s internal forms before transferring accounts. Recording offices may have specific procedures for entering court orders affecting real property. Each institution has separate internal processes that need to be followed to effect the transfer after the court’s recognition. To avoid surprises, it helps to communicate with institutions early and confirm their post-order requirements. Gathering the required certified documents and completing institution-specific forms expedites implementation of the court’s order. Legal counsel can coordinate with these entities to obtain the necessary confirmations and reduce administrative friction after relief is granted.
If a beneficiary objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will typically allow the objector to present objections and evidence at a hearing. Objections can raise factual disputes about the trustmaker’s intent, question the sufficiency of documentation, or assert competing claims to the asset. When objections occur, the process may involve discovery, additional declarations, or contested hearings where both sides present evidence and argument for the judge to decide. Resolving objections can take more time and resources than an uncontested petition, but many disagreements are settled through clarification of records or negotiated settlements. Counsel can help manage objections by collecting further evidence, addressing legal issues, and pursuing resolution either through negotiation or by presenting a persuasive case at the hearing to support recognition of the asset as trust property.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad Petition include negotiating directly with financial institutions for voluntary retitling, using a probate process such as a small estate affidavit when applicable, or relying on a pour-over will though that may require probate. In some cases, institutions are willing to accept the trust’s claim with sufficient documentation without a court order. Exploring these alternatives can be appropriate when parties are cooperative and documentation is strong enough to satisfy institutional requirements. However, when institutions decline voluntary cooperation or when disagreements among interested persons exist, a petition may be the most reliable way to obtain a clear legal ruling. Discussing the options early helps determine whether nonlitigious solutions are feasible or if court intervention is the most effective path to align title with the trustmaker’s intentions.
The cost of a Heggstad Petition varies with the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence to assemble, whether contested hearings are required, and court filing fees. Straightforward petitions with clear documentation and no objections can be less costly than contested matters that require discovery, multiple hearings, or depositions. Additional expenses may include fees for obtaining certified documents, title searches, or professional declarations. Because every case differs, an initial consultation to review the trust and affected assets helps provide a clearer estimate of likely costs. Early evidence collection and organized documentation also reduce attorney time and overall expense. We provide transparent communication about fees and anticipated costs to help clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition.
To start the Heggstad Petition process, gather the trust document, any wills or related estate planning documents, deeds, account statements, and correspondence with institutions regarding transfers. Compile any records that show attempted retitling or the trustmaker’s intention to include the asset in the trust. Having a clear inventory of the affected assets and copies of relevant documents speeds the initial review and allows counsel to evaluate the strength of a petition. Next, schedule a consultation to discuss the facts and determine whether a petition is appropriate. During that consultation, counsel can outline the required evidence, explain notice obligations, estimate timeline and costs, and advise on the best next steps to preserve the trustmaker’s plan and minimize administrative delay.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas