A Heggstad petition is a California court filing used to confirm that assets titled in a decedent’s name were intended to be part of a living trust and should be treated as trust property. For Long Beach residents navigating probate avoidance and trust administration, this legal process helps transfer property into the trust without full probate proceedings. The petition typically explains why the asset belongs in the trust, provides supporting documentation, and requests a court order recognizing the trust’s ownership. Our firm helps clients understand deadlines, required documents, and possible outcomes to minimize delay and cost in estate administration.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be a strategic step when assets were not retitled properly before death, but evidence shows intent to include those assets in the decedent’s trust. In many cases the petition reduces the estate’s exposure to lengthy probate, simplifies transfer to beneficiaries, and clarifies title issues for third parties such as banks or county recorder offices. The process requires careful proof, accurate paperwork, and coordination with trustees and beneficiaries. Whether a trust exists or needs clarification, understanding what to present in the petition and how to document ownership intentions is essential to achieving a smooth property transfer.
A Heggstad petition addresses situations where trust property was never fully transferred into the trust but was intended by the deceased to be trust property. By obtaining a court order recognizing the trust’s interest, beneficiaries and trustees can avoid the time, expense, and public nature of formal probate administration. This approach often results in clearer title for real estate, simpler asset liquidation or transfer to beneficiaries, and fewer disputes among interested parties. Additionally, a successful petition can streamline interactions with financial institutions and county recorders, enabling records to reflect the trust as owner and facilitating efficient estate settlement.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is based in San Jose and serves clients across California, including Long Beach, with a focus on estate planning and trust administration. Our team emphasizes clear communication, practical solutions, and careful preparation of filings such as Heggstad petitions. We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and local agencies to assemble supporting evidence and present a persuasive showing to the court. Clients receive guidance on timelines, likely outcomes, and the documents needed to substantiate the trust’s claim in order to protect family assets and honor the decedent’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is grounded in state law and case precedent and is used when assets that were intended to be trust property remain titled in the decedent’s name. The petition explains the factual background, cites the governing trust document, and provides evidence such as depositions, declarations, or transfer documents showing intent to transfer. Courts evaluate whether the transfer into the trust was intended but not completed and whether recognition is appropriate under the circumstances. Understanding both procedural requirements and practical evidence expectations helps petitioners present a complete case and reduces the risk of contested hearings.
The Heggstad petition often involves collaboration with trustees, beneficiaries, title companies, and other interested parties to obtain necessary declarations and records. Typical steps include reviewing the trust and related documents, gathering bank or title evidence, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and filing with the appropriate probate department. Hearings may be necessary if objections arise, and courts may require additional documentation to confirm ownership intent. Preparation focuses on addressing potential defenses, clarifying chain of title, and demonstrating consistency between the decedent’s actions and trust provisions.
A Heggstad petition requests a judicial determination that specific property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name. It explains why the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust, often citing the trust document, declarations from trustees or others, and supporting records. The court may then order that the property be treated as trust assets for purposes of administration and distribution, enabling transfer procedures consistent with the trust. The petition clarifies ownership status and reduces ambiguity for third parties, facilitating disposition of assets according to the trust’s terms.
Successful petitions typically include a clear narrative of events, the relevant trust provisions, and documentary or testimonial support such as bank records, transfer attempts, and consistent conduct by the decedent indicating intent to fund the trust. Petitioners must also identify interested parties and provide proper notice, submit declarations from witnesses or the trustee, and address any known objections. Courts will consider the sufficiency of the evidence and whether relief is appropriate without opening a formal probate estate. Careful drafting and thorough documentation reduce the chance of delays or contested proceedings.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the petition process and anticipate procedural requirements. Terms often encountered include trust funding, trustee, grantor, probate, title transfer, alternative dispute mechanisms, and court confirmation. Each term relates to how property is owned, managed, and transferred after death, and knowing these definitions helps beneficiaries and trustees make informed decisions. Our descriptions emphasize practical meaning and how the terms apply to a Heggstad petition, so parties know what documents to gather and what outcomes to expect during court review and post-order title adjustments.
Trust funding refers to the act of transferring ownership of assets into the name of the trust so they are controlled by the trust’s terms and trustee after the grantor’s death. Funding can involve retitling real property, changing beneficiary designations, assigning accounts, and executing deeds or assignments that place assets under the trust’s name. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to confirm that the asset was intended for the trust. Evidence of funding attempts and consistent behavior by the grantor are often important to support the claim that an asset should be treated as trust property.
Probate avoidance describes strategies and legal mechanisms designed to transfer assets outside the formal probate process, reducing time, expense, and public administration of the estate. Living trusts commonly serve this purpose by holding title to property, while techniques such as joint ownership, beneficiary designations, and payable-on-death arrangements also help. A Heggstad petition supports probate avoidance by asking a court to recognize assets as trust property even if they were not formally retitled, thereby allowing distribution under the trust rather than through probate administration. Courts evaluate whether avoidance is consistent with the decedent’s documented intent.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and for carrying out the grantor’s instructions regarding distribution. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and they often must present evidence to support Heggstad petitions when funding issues arise. Trustees may gather declarations, account records, and other proof to show an asset was intended for the trust. The trustee’s role extends to dealing with title companies, financial institutions, and the probate court to effectuate transfer and ensure beneficiaries receive their designated shares.
The term decedent refers to the person who has passed away and whose property and estate affairs are being administered under a will or trust. When a decedent created a living trust but failed to transfer certain assets into trust title prior to death, a Heggstad petition may be appropriate to show those assets should be treated as part of the trust. Evidence often revolves around the decedent’s written directions, communications, or actions demonstrating intent. Accurately documenting the decedent’s intent and the trust instrument helps courts determine whether to recognize the trust’s interest.
When assets remain in the decedent’s name, parties must choose between formal probate, informal transfer mechanisms, or a petition to recognize trust ownership. Formal probate may be necessary where there are contested claims or where no trust exists, but it tends to be more time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition can be a narrower, court-based remedy that seeks recognition for specific assets without full probate. Alternatives such as small estate affidavits or contractual arrangements with financial institutions may work in limited situations but often depend on the asset type and value. Selecting the right path depends on the facts and the objectives of trustees and beneficiaries.
For accounts or personal property with modest value, institutions sometimes allow informal transfers with an affidavit or proof of the trust document, avoiding court involvement. If the asset is valued below statutory thresholds or can be conveyed by a simple assignment, pursuing nonlitigious transfer may save time and expense. However, banks and title companies vary in their requirements and may insist on a court order when documentation is incomplete. Assessing asset value, institutional policies, and the clarity of supporting records helps determine whether a court petition is necessary or an informal approach will achieve a timely transfer.
When there is strong documentary proof such as signed deeds, account change requests, or beneficiary designations clearly linking the asset to the trust, many institutions will accept that evidence and process transfers without court orders. If available records show unequivocal intent and the affected parties agree, informal title corrections or direct transfers by institutions can resolve the issue efficiently. Still, even with clear documents, some situations call for a Heggstad petition to provide an unambiguous court ruling that prevents future disputes and ensures marketable title for real property transactions.
When beneficiaries, heirs, or third parties dispute whether an asset was intended for the trust, informal measures frequently fail or lead to future litigation. A Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate evidence and issue an authoritative determination on ownership, which reduces ambiguity and the risk of subsequent challenges. The court’s involvement creates a formal record that title companies and other institutions recognize, streamlining later transfers and protecting trustees and beneficiaries from claims. Litigation avoidance in the long term often depends on obtaining a clear judicial order in contested situations.
Real estate presents special challenges because recordable title matters for sales, refinancing, and ownership disputes. When deeds are not in the trust’s name, a Heggstad petition provides the legal foundation to have the court recognize the trust’s ownership interest and direct county recorders or title companies to accept corrected title. Complex chains of ownership, liens, or conflicting recordings may require judicial clarification to create marketable title. The petition process addresses these complications directly and produces a court order that third parties typically rely upon in subsequent transactions.
A comprehensive approach that includes a well-supported Heggstad petition reduces uncertainty by securing a judicial determination that assets belong to the trust. This outcome often prevents protracted disputes, clarifies rights and duties among beneficiaries and trustees, and results in clearer title for real estate and financial accounts. Courts may also resolve competing claims and set out procedures for distribution, which simplifies administration. By addressing contested issues early through the petition process, families and fiduciaries can move forward with asset distribution and estate settlement with greater confidence and fewer administrative obstacles.
Beyond the immediate legal determination, a court order from a Heggstad petition can facilitate interactions with county recorders, title insurers, and financial institutions that otherwise hesitate to change ownership records. The order provides a public, authoritative basis for transferring property, resolving liens, and clearing title for sale or refinancing. This certainty can increase the value and marketability of assets for beneficiaries and reduce the potential for future litigation. Ultimately, the comprehensive process aims to preserve estate value and protect beneficiaries’ rights through documented legal resolution.
When a court formally recognizes an asset as trust property, it creates a strong public record that limits opportunities for later challenges by heirs or creditors asserting competing claims. The judicial determination clarifies the grantor’s intent and prevents re-litigating ownership in the future. This certainty benefits trustees who must manage and distribute assets responsibly, and it benefits beneficiaries who can access their inheritances with less delay. The reduced risk of dispute can also lower overall estate administration costs and emotional strain on family members during what is often a sensitive time following a loved one’s death.
A court order confirming trust ownership makes it much easier to deal with title companies, banks, and other institutions that require clear evidence of ownership before transferring or releasing assets. For real property, the order helps create marketable title needed for sale or refinancing, and for financial accounts it supports account transfers to the trustee for distribution. By removing administrative hurdles, the comprehensive approach speeds up asset distribution and helps beneficiaries receive their intended property without unnecessary delays or additional legal hurdles.
Collecting thorough documentation is essential when preparing a Heggstad petition. Relevant materials can include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, transfer records, change-of-title requests, and any written or electronic communications showing the decedent’s intent. Declarations from the trustee or other witnesses that describe the decedent’s actions and statements can bolster a petition. Detailed records reduce uncertainty, speed the court’s review, and help avoid additional evidentiary hearings. Taking time to assemble clear and organized proof before filing increases the likelihood of a straightforward resolution and minimizes before-the-court complications.
Title companies and financial institutions often require a court order or specific documentation to change ownership records. Anticipate their standards by discussing the matter early with the title company, obtaining its list of required forms, and including relevant documentation with the petition. If the property will be sold, a clear court order addressing title issues can prevent last-minute delays at escrow. Coordinating with title professionals helps ensure that the court’s order will be effective in practice and that subsequent transactions proceed smoothly without additional corrective steps.
Families and trustees often consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name and informal transfers are not possible or have failed. The petition offers a court-based path to clarify ownership and implement the trust’s terms without full probate administration. It can be particularly useful when banks or title companies refuse to accept the trust document alone, or when property title issues complicate sales or refinancing. By pursuing a judicial determination, parties can obtain reliable documentation that supports transfer and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to reduce uncertainty and avoid successive disputes about the decedent’s intent. A court ruling that recognizes trust ownership provides finality for title companies and financial institutions, helping move transactions forward and enabling trustees to administer the estate efficiently. For families concerned about delays, conflicting claims, or administrative bottlenecks, a Heggstad petition can resolve problematic assets and preserve estate value while ensuring that distributions occur according to the trust’s provisions.
Typical scenarios include real estate that was never deeded into a trust, bank or brokerage accounts left in the decedent’s name, and instances where paperwork was prepared but not finalized before death. Often the decedent’s intent is evident through draft documents, receipts, or communications, but formal title changes were not completed. Other common circumstances include last-minute changes, clerical errors, or third-party refusals to accept trust copies. In each case, a well-documented petition seeks judicial recognition so assets can be administered under the trust without protracted probate.
Real property that remains titled in the decedent’s name despite trust planning is a frequent cause for Heggstad petitions. Deeds may have been prepared but not recorded, or transfers may not have been completed before death. Because real property often requires recordable title for sale or financing, a court order recognizing trust ownership helps clear title for market transactions and ensures the trustee can manage or convey the property as directed by the trust. This intervention addresses both administrative needs and the prevention of ownership disputes.
Bank and brokerage accounts are commonly overlooked in trust funding. Accounts in the decedent’s name can create access and distribution problems for trustees. Institutions may refuse to transfer accounts based on the trust alone, requiring court confirmation. A Heggstad petition demonstrates intent to fund the trust and provides the legal support institutions need to transfer account ownership to the trustee, enabling timely distribution and preventing delays that can diminish estate value through fees or missed investment opportunities.
Clerical mistakes, unsigned documents, or incomplete transfer forms may leave intended trust assets improperly titled at death. Even when the decedent took steps toward funding, a failure to complete a deed or account change can result in confusion. A petition addresses these mishaps by compiling proof of intent and requesting court recognition that the assets were meant to be in the trust. Correcting these errors through the petition process helps trustees and beneficiaries avoid additional administrative burdens and restores alignment with the decedent’s estate plan.
Although based in San Jose, Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation for estate planning and trust administration matters affecting Long Beach residents. We handle the preparation and filing of Heggstad petitions, coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries, and work with local probate departments to ensure filings meet county-specific requirements. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough documentation, and practical guidance so that clients understand each step. We also assist in post-order steps such as title updates and coordination with financial institutions to implement the court’s directives and effectuate transfers.
Our firm focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters, providing personalized attention to the unique facts of each case. We help clients assemble supporting documentation, draft persuasive petitions and declarations, and comply with local rules and procedures in Los Angeles County. From initial case evaluation through court proceedings and post-order implementation, we aim to reduce delays and simplify the process for trustees and beneficiaries. Clear communication about expectations, likely timelines, and procedural steps is a hallmark of how we work with clients during what can otherwise be a complex administrative phase.
We prioritize careful preparation of filings so courts have the evidence they need to make a favorable determination about trust ownership. This includes organizing records, obtaining witness declarations, and anticipating potential objections by interested parties. We also work with title companies and financial institutions to confirm the forms and orders required for practical transfer. Our goal is to secure a court order that is effective in the real world, enabling trustees to administer assets according to the trust and allowing beneficiaries to receive their distributions without unnecessary friction.
Clients appreciate straightforward guidance about options, requirements, and likely outcomes when addressing untransferred trust assets. We help evaluate whether an informal transfer is feasible or whether a petition is the better choice, and we present clear paths for resolving title issues and facilitating distributions. Our representation emphasizes resolving disputes efficiently and ensuring that actions taken align with the decedent’s documented intentions. Practical support during hearing preparation, negotiations with interested parties, and post-order steps helps bring estate administration to a timely conclusion.
The process typically begins with an initial consultation to review the trust, title documents, and any relevant correspondence or drafts indicating the decedent’s intent. We then gather supporting records and draft the petition and required declarations, ensuring compliance with county filing rules. After filing and serving notice on interested parties, we prepare for potential hearings and work to resolve objections through negotiation where possible. When a court order is obtained, we assist with implementing the order, including recording documents and coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to effectuate transfers.
Initial case evaluation focuses on reviewing the trust documents, deeds, account records, and any communications showing intent to fund the trust. We identify assets affected, potential interested parties, and any gaps in documentation that require additional proof. Part of this phase includes discussing possible outcomes and whether a petition or an informal transfer approach is most appropriate. A thorough document review allows us to plan the petition, determine which declarations will be necessary, and estimate likely timelines for filing and court action.
Gathering evidence includes obtaining account statements, copies of deeds, transfer requests, emails, correspondence, and declarations from people who can attest to the decedent’s intent. These materials are organized to show a consistent pattern of behavior demonstrating the grantor’s plan to place the asset in the trust. We also verify chain of title and identify any potential liens or encumbrances. Well-prepared evidence reduces the likelihood of lengthy hearings and helps the court understand the sequence of events leading to the funding omission.
We determine who must be served with notice under probate rules, including beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors, and prepare required service documents. Proper notice gives interested parties an opportunity to respond and helps avoid procedural challenges that could delay the petition. Early communication with these parties often reduces contested hearings and may lead to agreements that streamline resolution. We also handle filing fee calculations, prepare captioned pleadings, and ensure that local court rules are followed to minimize administrative obstacles at the time of filing.
After drafting the petition and supporting declarations, we file the documents with the appropriate probate department and serve required notices to interested parties. Filing includes preparing the court forms, exhibits, and any proposed orders, as well as paying statutory fees. Service is conducted according to legal requirements to ensure the court will consider the petition. This stage requires attention to procedural detail and local rules to prevent dismissal or delays due to improper service or incomplete paperwork, and it prepares the case for potential hearing dates.
Preparing the court filing involves assembling the petition, declarations, exhibits, and proposed order in the format required by the court. Attention to detail is important for clarity and to expedite the court’s review. We include exhibits that demonstrate the decedent’s intent, and prepare declarations that explain the factual background. Drafting anticipates likely questions and addresses them with documentary support, making filings easier for the court to evaluate and reducing the chance of supplemental requests that can delay resolution.
Service of process gives parties notice of the petition and an opportunity to respond. We ensure service is completed according to statutory requirements, which may include personal service, mail, or publication depending on the circumstances. Accurate service avoids procedural challenges that could derail the petition. When possible, we also seek stipulations from interested parties before hearings to streamline proceedings. Clear service and timely communication help reduce contested litigation and promote cooperative resolution where feasible.
The hearing phase includes presenting supporting declarations and evidence to the court and responding to any objections. If the court is satisfied, it will issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property. After obtaining the order, we assist with practical implementation, including recording any required documents with county recorders and coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to update ownership records. Ensuring the order meets the needs of third parties is an important part of this phase to prevent delays in title updates and distributions.
At the hearing, declarations and exhibits are presented to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the factual basis for recognizing trust ownership. The court evaluates the sufficiency of evidence and any objections from interested parties. Preparation for the hearing includes organizing witnesses, anticipating likely challenges, and ensuring that the proposed order accurately reflects the relief requested. A well-organized presentation helps the court reach a clear conclusion and reduces the likelihood of follow-up proceedings or additional evidentiary requirements.
Once a court order is issued, implementation includes recording deeds or other documentation, providing the order to title insurers and financial institutions, and completing required transfers to the trustee. We assist with post-order steps to ensure institutions accept the order and update records accordingly. This phase often requires coordination across multiple agencies and vendors, and we help make certain the court’s directive is effective in practice so trustees can manage and distribute assets under the trust without further administrative barriers.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used in California to ask the court to recognize certain assets as belonging to a trust even though those assets were not transferred into the trust’s name before the grantor’s death. It is commonly used when deeds, account changes, or other transfer steps were prepared or intended but not completed. The petition presents facts and supporting evidence to show the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and asks the court to issue an order that the asset be treated as trust property for administration and distribution purposes. Filing a petition is appropriate when institutions or third parties require a court order for title correction or when disputes among interested parties make straightforward transfers risky. The petition avoids opening a full probate estate for every asset and provides a judicial determination that institutions typically respect. The specific facts dictate whether a petition is necessary or whether an informal transfer or alternative remedy will suffice.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on the county’s calendar, complexity of the facts, and whether any objections are filed. In uncontested cases with clear documentation, the process can be relatively swift, limited to filing and a brief hearing, which may take a few weeks to a few months depending on the court’s availability. If interested parties contest the petition or additional evidence is required, the matter may take longer as hearings and supplemental filings extend the timeline and require additional preparation. Preparation time is also a factor, since gathering declarations, records, and title documentation can take several weeks. Working proactively to assemble evidence, serve notice properly, and address potential objections early often shortens the overall timeframe and reduces the chance of multiple court appearances.
Supporting evidence commonly includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, receipts for transfer efforts, and any written or electronic communications indicating the decedent’s intent. Declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or professionals who assisted the grantor can provide factual context describing steps taken toward funding. Where a deed was prepared but not recorded, or an account change form was submitted but not finalized, those documents are particularly useful to show intent to include the asset in the trust. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. Clear, organized documentation and credible declarations reduce the chance of contested hearings and strengthen the petition’s chance of success, while gaps in records may require additional proof or testimony.
A Heggstad petition can help avoid the necessity of a full probate proceeding for the specific asset at issue by obtaining a court order that treats the property as trust property. However, it does not automatically resolve all estate administration needs; other assets or claims may still require different procedures. The petition addresses the ownership question for particular assets and can prevent those items from being subject to probate administration, but the overall estate may still involve additional steps depending on other assets and liabilities. Whether the petition fully avoids probate depends on the case facts and whether all interested parties accept the court’s order. When multiple assets are affected or disputes persist, some probate steps may still be necessary, and the petition should be viewed as a tool to resolve title issues efficiently rather than an all-purpose replacement for other estate processes.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or creditors may object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should remain in the decedent’s estate or otherwise contest the claimed intent. Proper notice and clear evidence reduce the chance of objections, but when disagreements arise, the court will evaluate competing claims and may hold hearings to resolve factual disputes. If an objection is raised, parties can often negotiate stipulations or rely on the court’s factual determination to resolve the issue. When objections occur, having well-documented proof and careful preparation is especially important. The court will weigh the evidence presented by both sides and consider the trust document, conduct of the decedent, and any relevant communications in determining whether to grant the requested relief.
If the court grants a Heggstad petition recognizing real property as trust property, the resulting order provides the basis for recording corrected title documents or otherwise conveying the property in the trust’s name. Title companies and county recorders typically accept a judicial order as sufficient authority to change public records or insure title consistent with the court’s direction. This facilitates sales, refinancing, or trustee-driven transfers that require marketable title and clear documentation of ownership. Implementation requires careful drafting of post-order documents and coordination with title insurers to ensure the order satisfies their underwriting requirements. Working with title professionals to confirm necessary forms and recording steps prevents unexpected delays and ensures the court’s determination has practical effect for future transactions involving the property.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include informal transfers requested by financial institutions, small estate procedures for limited assets, or negotiated agreements among interested parties to effect transfer without court intervention. Institutions sometimes accept affidavits, copies of trust documents, or declarations when an asset’s value is low and ownership is clear. These alternatives can be quicker and less costly when parties are cooperative and documentation is strong, but they depend on institutional policies and the asset type. When informal measures are refused or disputes exist, a petition provides a formal remedy that establishes legal clarity. Choosing the right path depends on the asset, the willingness of institutions to cooperate, and whether interested parties agree to a nonjudicial resolution or require a court determination to protect their interests.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the petitioner receives a signed order that can be used to update records with title companies, county recorders, and financial institutions. The trustee can then take steps to record deeds, transfer accounts, or otherwise administer the asset under the trust’s terms. The order offers a public record of the court’s determination, which facilitates implementation and helps prevent future disputes over ownership. Following the order, attention turns to practical matters such as recording deeds, providing the order to institutions, and ensuring distributions adhere to the trust. We assist clients through these post-order steps to confirm that the court’s ruling leads to effective asset transfers in the marketplace and with third-party service providers.
Banks and title companies generally accept a properly drafted and entered court order as sufficient authority to change ownership records, but their acceptance may depend on the order’s specific language and supporting documentation. Title insurers may require particular wording or additional affidavits to issue clear title insurance, and banks may have internal protocols for transferring accounts. Engaging these institutions early and tailoring the proposed order to meet their needs helps ensure acceptance and prevents post-order complications. Coordinating with the relevant institutions before and after filing helps align the petition’s relief with practical requirements. This collaborative approach reduces surprises and makes it more likely that the court’s decision will be implemented smoothly by third-party entities responsible for record changes or account transfers.
To start the Heggstad petition process in Long Beach, gather the trust document, deeds, account records, and any proof of transfer attempts or communications reflecting the decedent’s intent. Contact a firm experienced in estate planning matters to review documents, identify interested parties, and outline the necessary evidence and procedural steps. An early review helps determine whether an informal transfer might suffice or whether a petition is advisable based on the asset type and institutional requirements. Once prepared, the petition is drafted and filed in the appropriate probate department, with service on required parties and coordination for any anticipated objections. From filing through post-order implementation, careful preparation and communication are important to achieve an efficient resolution that honors the decedent’s wishes and facilitates proper administration of trust assets.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas