A trust modification petition can help property owners and fiduciaries address changed circumstances, correct drafting mistakes, or adapt to new family or financial realities. In Montebello and greater Los Angeles County, property owners commonly seek modifications to update beneficiaries, adjust trustee powers, or clarify trust terms without having to dissolve or rebuild an entire estate plan. This guide explains the typical grounds for filing a petition, the procedural steps in state courts, and practical considerations when deciding whether a petition is the right path. Readers will gain a realistic sense of how a modification can preserve family intentions while responding to unexpected events.
Many clients approach a trust modification petition with concerns about timelines, costs, and the likelihood of court approval. A petition is often appropriate when parties agree on the change but need judicial authority to ensure enforceability. It can also resolve disputes over ambiguous language or grant courts the power to reform terms that were based on mistake or misapprehension. This article outlines when a petition is commonly used, what documentation the court typically expects, and how Montebello residents can weigh the benefits of a petition against alternative routes like trustee action, beneficiary consent, or a full trust restatement.
A trust modification petition provides a formal, court-supervised way to adapt an existing trust to current needs while maintaining legal protection for trust assets. For families in Montebello, modification can prevent unintended outcomes, address tax or creditor concerns, and clarify trustee authority during transitions. When beneficiaries are in agreement, a court order creates certainty for financial institutions and third parties that might otherwise refuse to follow changed instructions. For trustees facing ambiguous provisions or external challenges, a petition reduces risk by obtaining clear judicial direction, which helps protect fiduciary decision-making and preserve the settlor’s original intentions as circumstances evolve.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across California with a wide range of estate planning matters, including trust creation, amendment, and modification petitions. Our team focuses on practical solutions tailored to each client’s family and financial situation, offering clear guidance on procedural requirements, documentation, and likely outcomes in probate court. We work to ensure clients understand their options, the timeline for petitions, and the potential impacts on beneficiaries and trustees. Whether a trust requires minor clarifications or formal court approval to reflect changed intentions, we support clients through each stage of the process.
A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes to an existing trust document when circumstances make the original terms impractical, ambiguous, or inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. Grounds for modification may include drafting errors, changed tax laws, relocations, beneficiary changes, or newly discovered property interests. The petition typically explains the reason for modification, identifies the proposed changes, and provides notice to interested parties. Court approval formalizes the amendment, helping trustees administer assets in accordance with updated directions and giving third parties confidence that the modified terms are legally binding.
Not all trust changes require a court petition. Some amendments can be handled directly by a settlor through a recorded amendment or restatement, while other situations can be resolved with beneficiary consent and supporting documentation. A petition becomes necessary when a trustee or beneficiary seeks judicial authority to change terms due to ambiguity, mistake, or a need for judicial clarification to protect the trust’s administration. Courts assess the petition in light of applicable statutory provisions, the trust document’s wording, and evidence about the settlor’s intent and present circumstances.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing made to a probate or superior court requesting approval to change the terms of an existing trust. The petition outlines the proposed amendment or reformation, the factual basis supporting it, and the parties affected by the change. If the settlor is alive and capable, the court may sometimes approve changes requested by the settlor or facilitated by a judge under statutory authority. If the settlor is unavailable or incapacitated, courts evaluate whether reformation or modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or is necessary to remedy mistakes and facilitate proper administration.
A successful petition typically includes a clear statement of the requested modification, supporting declarations or affidavits, the original trust document, any relevant amendments, and proof of notice to beneficiaries and interested parties. The court will review statutory standards, evaluate evidence of the settlor’s intent or mistake, and consider objections from beneficiaries or creditors. Depending on local practice, settlement conferences or mediation may be encouraged to avoid contested litigation. Once the court rules, the order is recorded or provided to trustees and institutions to effectuate the change in trust administration.
Understanding common terms helps petitioners and beneficiaries navigate the process more effectively. This glossary clarifies legal and procedural language such as reformation, decanting, settlor, trustee duties, and Heggstad petitions. By recognizing these terms, parties can better prepare documentary evidence, understand the scope of relief the court can grant, and anticipate possible responses from other interested parties. Clear definitions also improve communication with trustees, banks, and advisors when implementing a modification after court approval.
Reformation is a judicial remedy that adjusts the written terms of a trust to reflect the settlor’s actual intent when the document contains a mistake or fails to express that intent. Reformation petitions present evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or testimony showing the settlor’s intention at the time the trust was created. Courts require convincing proof that the written language misstates the settlor’s intent due to mistake. Reformation results in a court-ordered change to the trust document, which directs trustees to administer assets according to the corrected terms going forward.
Decanting involves a trustee transferring assets from one trust into a new trust with different terms, using statutory authority granted in many states. This administrative option can be used to adjust distributions, extend trust terms, or change trustee powers without court intervention when statutes and trust provisions allow it. Decanting is controlled by state law and by the specific powers granted in the trust document, and it typically requires careful documentation to ensure the new trust reflects permissible changes while protecting fiduciary responsibilities and beneficiary interests.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to establish that assets were intended to be part of a trust even though title or documentation incorrectly lists them in an individual’s name. The petition proves that the transferor intended trust treatment for the assets, enabling the court to direct that the property be administered under the trust terms. This procedure is especially useful when administrative or record-keeping oversights created unintended gaps between the trust document and asset titles, and the petition helps prevent disputes among beneficiaries and creditors about asset ownership.
A pour-over will directs that any assets not already placed in a trust at death be distributed into the settlor’s trust, ensuring comprehensive asset coverage. It functions alongside a revocable living trust and other instruments such as a financial power of attorney and advance health care directive. When combined with trust-related court petitions, a pour-over will helps maintain the settlor’s estate plan goals by capturing stray assets and directing them to the trust, though it still goes through probate for assets titled exclusively in the deceased’s name.
Parties considering changes to a trust should weigh several approaches. A restatement or amendment signed by the settlor can directly alter terms without court involvement if the settlor is available and has capacity. Consent among beneficiaries can sometimes authorize administrative changes, though not all changes can be effected by consent alone. Decanting relies on trustee powers and statutory authority. When there is disagreement, ambiguity, or a need to correct mistakes, a trust modification petition provides authoritative relief through court involvement. The right choice depends on settlor capacity, document language, beneficiary positions, and the nature of the requested change.
If the settlor of a revocable trust remains capable, they may directly execute an amendment or restatement to make targeted changes. This approach is usually faster and less costly than court petitions because it avoids litigation and formal court filings. Amendments require proper execution, often with witnessing or notarization consistent with the trust’s execution requirements. When changes are limited to beneficiary names, distribution schedules, or trustee appointments and the settlor has capacity, a signed amendment or restatement ensures the trust reflects current intentions without involving the court or risking contested proceedings.
In some cases trustees can take administrative actions under the authority granted by the trust’s terms or by state law, such as decanting or reallocating assets within permitted parameters. Beneficiaries may also reach an agreement to amend certain provisions when allowed by the trust. These nonjudicial routes can resolve straightforward issues efficiently and without public court records. However, to be effective, such actions must be documented clearly and comply with the trust instrument and statutory requirements to avoid later disputes or challenges by dissenting beneficiaries or creditors.
When the trust language is unclear, when evidence suggests a drafting mistake, or when beneficiaries disagree about administration, a court petition may be the appropriate way to obtain definitive relief. Judicial involvement ensures that the record is thorough and that the court’s order will be respected by financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties. In situations where stakes are high or conflicts are likely to persist, pursuing a modification petition provides an authoritative resolution and reduces ongoing uncertainty about how trust assets should be handled.
Trusts holding complex assets, business interests, retirement accounts, or assets with tax consequences may require judicial review to ensure changes do not create unintended tax liabilities or breach fiduciary duties. A petition allows courts to consider competing legal and financial factors when approving modifications, and the resulting order can guide trustees in executing changes without exposing the trust to future challenges. This process is especially important when proposed modifications could affect creditor rights, charitable distributions, or the long-term management of family wealth.
A comprehensive approach that includes a properly prepared petition and supporting evidence yields several benefits. It creates an enforceable court order that clarifies trustee authority and beneficiary rights, reduces the risk of future disputes, and provides a formal record for banks and title companies. For families concerned about clear administration of assets across jurisdictions, the court’s decision can streamline transfers and reduce administrative friction. The process may also identify and resolve ancillary issues such as inadvertent omissions, ambiguous successor provisions, or conflicts between asset titles and the trust document.
By engaging the court when necessary, petitioners help ensure that modifications are durable and less vulnerable to later challenge. Comprehensive petitions often include detailed evidentiary support, such as contemporaneous documents and beneficiary declarations, which strengthen the legal basis for the requested changes. The resulting judicial order can be recorded or provided to institutions to effectuate changes efficiently, preserving the settlor’s intended distribution and administration while protecting trustees and beneficiaries from uncertainty and disputes over trust assets.
Court approval of a trust modification provides legal certainty that the updated terms are valid and enforceable, which simplifies interactions with banks, brokerage firms, and title companies. Trustees receive explicit instructions backed by judicial authority, reducing hesitation in administering assets. Beneficiaries also benefit from a formal resolution that limits future contests. This clarity can be especially valuable for assets held across institutions or when the modification affects distributions and successor trustee powers, as the court’s order serves as clear guidance for carrying out the settlor’s revised intentions.
Seeking court approval can decrease the likelihood of future litigation by addressing potential disputes proactively and placing the resolution on the public record. A court-sanctioned modification is less susceptible to collateral attack, and it provides trustees with a defensible course of action if contested by other parties. While the petition process may involve more upfront effort than informal fixes, the resulting order often delivers long-term stability and predictability in how the trust will be administered for the benefit of the named beneficiaries and successor fiduciaries.
Collecting clear documentary evidence is fundamental when preparing a trust modification petition. Look for drafts, correspondence, email exchanges, or signed notes that demonstrate the settlor’s intent, any drafting mistakes, or circumstances that justify the requested change. Bank statements, asset titles, and beneficiary communications can also support claims about asset ownership or intended distributions. Strong documentation improves the likelihood of court acceptance and can streamline notice to interested parties. Organize files chronologically and provide concise declarations explaining the relevance of each document to the requested modification.
Before filing a petition, assess alternatives such as trustee-authorized actions, decanting, or settlor-signed amendments when available. If court filing remains the best route, prepare for scrutiny by ensuring pleadings are thorough and evidence addresses likely objections. Anticipate questions about the settlor’s capacity, the nature of any mistake, and the effect of the modification on creditors or charitable interests. Thorough preparation increases the chance of a favorable outcome and can shorten the overall process by limiting procedural delays and narrowing contested issues.
Residents may consider a trust modification petition when the trust no longer aligns with a family’s needs or when written terms conflict with documented intentions. Common triggers include changes in family structure, updated tax or trust law, the need to correct drafting errors, or when asset ownership records do not match trust schedules. A petition can address these issues while protecting fiduciary duties and ensuring proper administration. It is a useful tool for preserving the settlor’s goals while providing a formal mechanism to resolve ambiguity or fix unintended provisions in an established trust.
Another reason to file a petition is to obtain judicial clarity when third-party institutions refuse to recognize informal changes or when beneficiaries question the validity of trustee actions. Seeking a court order reduces uncertainty and creates an authoritative record for transfers, distributions, and trustee decision-making. When beneficiaries or trustees face disputes that could delay asset administration or expose the trust to claims, a properly supported petition can provide a definitive resolution that allows the trust to continue functioning according to updated terms.
Common circumstances include discovery of drafting errors, discrepancies between asset titles and the trust schedule, changes in family relationships such as marriages or divorces, and newly identified tax consequences. Trustees may also seek modification when administrative provisions are unclear or when circumstances outside the settlor’s control make original directions impractical. In some cases, beneficiaries may request modification to address changed needs or hardships. Each situation requires careful review of the trust document, relevant statutes, and potential impacts on creditors and charitable beneficiaries.
Drafting errors or ambiguous provisions in a trust can create uncertainty about a settlor’s intended distributions or trustee powers. When language is unclear or conflicts with other terms in the trust, interested parties often seek judicial reformation or clarification so trustees can administer assets without risk of liability. Evidence to support reformation may include earlier drafts, communications with advisors, or other documentation showing the settlor’s likely intent. Courts will carefully review such evidence before ordering changes, as the remedy permanently alters the trust’s written terms.
When assets were intended to be part of a trust but remain titled in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad petition or similar proceeding can establish that the property should be treated as trust property. This type of petition prevents distribution delays and clarifies ownership for creditors and beneficiaries. Documentation such as transfer instructions, beneficiary designations, and contemporaneous records indicating the settlor’s intention to place assets in the trust are often critical to success. Resolving title discrepancies ensures the trust functions as intended after the settlor’s incapacity or death.
Significant life events, such as the birth of a child, divorce, death of a beneficiary, or major changes in financial status, may render existing trust provisions inappropriate. A petition can adjust distributions, alter successor trustee arrangements, or modify spending powers to reflect new realities. Courts will consider the settlor’s original goals and whether the proposed modification reasonably harmonizes with those goals. This process helps ensure the trust remains a functional and durable instrument for managing assets in light of updated family dynamics and financial needs.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers guidance to Montebello residents seeking trust modifications, petition assistance, or related estate planning services. We provide detailed help preparing petitions, assembling supporting evidence, and serving notice to beneficiaries while explaining the implications of each option. Whether resolving a title discrepancy, clarifying trustee powers, or correcting a drafting mistake, our approach focuses on practical, well-documented solutions to protect trust assets and facilitate proper administration. We aim to help clients navigate court procedures and ensure modifications reflect the settlor’s intent.
Clients choose our office because we emphasize clear communication, careful documentation, and practical outcomes in trust modification matters. We work closely with clients to gather relevant records, explain the statutory standards that courts apply, and develop persuasive petitions that address likely points of court inquiry. Our goal is to provide a road map that assists trustees and beneficiaries in understanding how a petition will be handled and what evidence will be most compelling, so the court has a full record to evaluate the requested changes.
We assist clients with all phases of the petition process, from preliminary analysis and evidence collection to drafting pleadings and coordinating notice to interested parties. When informal resolution is possible, we help document agreements and take steps to implement administrative changes. When court involvement is necessary, we prepare thorough filings and support clients through hearings and post-order implementation. Throughout, we focus on clear explanations of potential outcomes, timelines, and options for minimizing delay and expense while securing durable results.
Our approach is client-centered and designed to reduce uncertainty in trust administration. We advise trustees about their duties when addressing modifications, help beneficiaries understand their rights, and coordinate with financial institutions to ensure that court orders are properly recognized. For Montebello residents dealing with title issues, ambiguity, or contested matters, we offer practical guidance to move the case forward in a way that preserves the settlor’s intent and protects the trust’s integrity for current and future beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and related records to identify the most appropriate path forward. We evaluate whether the settlor can act directly, whether trustee authority or beneficiary consent might achieve the objective, or whether a petition is necessary. If court action is recommended, we collect evidence, draft the petition, and coordinate service and notice requirements. We also keep clients informed about anticipated timelines, potential objections, and procedural steps so they can make informed decisions throughout the process.
Preparation focuses on gathering the documents and testimony needed to support the requested modification. This includes locating the original trust, any amendments, drafts, correspondence, financial records, and asset titles. We prepare declarations from relevant witnesses and compile a chronology that explains why the proposed change is needed. A well-prepared petition anticipates likely objections and presents a narrative that helps the court understand the settlor’s intent, the nature of any mistake, and the practical effects of the requested modification.
We carefully review all trust-related documents to determine how the existing language interacts with assets and beneficiary designations. This review identifies ambiguities, inconsistencies, or drafting mistakes that a petition should address. We also examine ancillary documents such as deeds, account statements, and communications with advisors to build a factual record demonstrating the settlor’s intent or the circumstances that justify modification. This thorough review informs the legal theory and the evidentiary presentation in the petition.
Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, and other witnesses may be necessary to support factual assertions in the petition. We prepare these declarations to provide clear, admissible statements about intent, property ownership, and communications. In parallel, we prepare proof of service documents to ensure all interested parties receive proper notice. Proper notice reduces the risk of procedural challenges and helps ensure that the petition proceeds on a solid foundation compliant with statutory and local court rules.
Once the petition and supporting materials are assembled, we file the petition with the appropriate probate or superior court and serve interested parties according to statutory requirements. The court may set hearings, schedule case management conferences, or encourage settlement discussions. We monitor deadlines for responses, address any procedural issues the court raises, and work to keep the process moving efficiently. If beneficiaries file objections, we evaluate the objections and pursue resolution through negotiation, stipulation, or court briefing as needed.
Coordinating proper service on all interested parties is essential to avoid delays or jurisdictional problems. If objections arise, we assess their basis, provide supplemental evidence when appropriate, and negotiate toward resolution. Where settlement is possible, we document agreements and present them to the court for approval. Where disputes persist, we prepare focused briefs and evidentiary submissions to address objection issues and clarify the legal standards supporting the requested modification.
Courts often encourage alternative dispute resolution to limit adversarial proceedings. We explore settlement options and structured agreements among beneficiaries to achieve desired outcomes without a contested hearing. When mediation is appropriate, we represent our clients’ interests to negotiate terms that reflect the settlor’s intent while addressing stakeholder concerns. Documented settlements can then be submitted to the court for approval, streamlining the process and reducing the time and expense typically associated with contested litigation.
If the petition proceeds to a hearing, we present the factual record and legal arguments supporting modification or reformation. The court will evaluate whether the requested change aligns with statutory requirements and the settlor’s probable intent. When the court issues an order, we assist with recording or providing the order to financial institutions, updating asset titles if necessary, and advising trustees on implementation steps. Post-order actions ensure that the trust operates under the newly clarified terms and that third parties recognize the court-approved changes.
At hearing, clear, well-organized evidence is crucial to persuading the court to grant the requested modification. We present declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument that address the statutory basis for relief and anticipated counterarguments. The court’s order will specify the exact modifications approved and any conditions or directions for trustees. Obtaining a clear, well-drafted order reduces future disputes and provides trustees with the authority needed to administer trust assets consistent with the ruling.
After obtaining a court order, we assist with recording or delivering the order to banks, title companies, and other institutions to effectuate changes in title, beneficiary status, or trustee authority. We develop a checklist for trustees to follow that includes updating account records, transferring assets if necessary, and ensuring distributions comply with the new terms. This implementation phase is important to make the court’s decision effective in practice and to protect trustees and beneficiaries from future administrative disputes.
Courts will consider a petition to modify or reform a trust when there is evidence of a drafting mistake, ambiguous language, or changed circumstances that make the original provisions impractical. Grounds can include clerical errors, an incomplete transfer of assets, changes in family relationships, or legal developments that interfere with the trust’s operation. The petition should clearly explain the factual basis for the requested change and how the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or statutory standards for reformation. Documentary evidence like drafts, correspondence, contemporaneous notes, and asset records strengthens a pleading by showing why the written trust does not reflect the settlor’s true intentions. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence and the proposed change’s effect on beneficiaries and creditors before granting relief. A thoughtfully prepared petition that anticipates potential objections is more likely to result in a favorable court order and practical clarity for trust administration.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, whether objections are filed, and the court’s schedule. Uncontested matters resolved by agreement may conclude more quickly, often within a few months, while contested petitions that require extensive discovery or hearings can take longer. Local court practices and the need for additional evidence or briefing also affect the timetable for resolution. Preparing a thorough petition and providing clear notice to interested parties can reduce delays. Early communication and efforts to resolve disputes through mediation or settlement often accelerate the process. We advise clients on realistic timelines based on the specific facts of each case and the likely procedural steps required by the court.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes agree to modify a trust without filing a petition, depending on the trust’s provisions and state law. When all interested parties consent and the proposed change is within the powers granted by the trust instrument or by statute, they may execute a written agreement or amendment that accomplishes the change. This route avoids court filings and public proceedings but requires careful documentation to ensure enforceability and to protect the trustee from future claims. If not all parties agree or if statutory approval is required for certain changes, a court petition may still be necessary. Even where beneficiary consent is available, recording clear written documentation and obtaining a court-acknowledged order can provide additional certainty and reduce the risk of later disputes over the trust’s administration.
Helpful evidence for a reformation petition includes earlier drafts of the trust, emails or letters reflecting the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous meeting notes, and declarations from witnesses who participated in the drafting process. Financial records and asset transfer documents showing intended placements into the trust can also be critical. The more direct and contemporaneous the evidence tying the settlor’s intent to the requested modification, the stronger the petition. Affidavits or declarations that explain the context and identify the precise nature of the mistake or ambiguity help the court evaluate the request. Courts look for persuasive, reliable evidence that the written document does not reflect what the settlor intended, so compiling a clear and organized evidentiary record is essential to success.
A trust modification petition can affect creditor claims and tax consequences depending on the nature of the changes and the timing of the petition. Courts will consider whether a modification impairs creditor rights or creates tax liabilities, especially if the change affects distributions or ownership of assets. Where creditor concerns exist, the court may require notice or other protective measures before approving a modification. Regarding taxes, modifications that alter ownership, beneficiary designations, or the structure of trusts may have estate, gift, or income tax implications. It is often beneficial to coordinate the petition with tax counsel or financial advisors to ensure the proposed changes achieve the intended result without unintended tax consequences for beneficiaries or the trust estate.
A Heggstad petition is filed to establish that property titled in an individual’s name was intended to be trust property. This petition presents evidence that, despite title inconsistencies, the settlor intended the asset to be governed by the trust. Heggstad proceedings can be important when transfers were incomplete or when documentation does not match the trust schedule, allowing the court to direct that the property be administered under the trust terms. Success in a Heggstad petition typically depends on evidence such as transfer instructions, contemporaneous statements, account records, and witness declarations showing the settlor’s intent. Resolving title discrepancies through a Heggstad filing helps ensure assets are distributed according to the trust and reduces administrative obstacles after the settlor’s incapacity or death.
Decanting is an option available under certain statutes and trust provisions where a trustee transfers assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms. It can accomplish many administrative changes without court involvement, but it depends on trustee powers and state law limits. Decanting is useful for addressing restrictive provisions, extending trust duration, or making distribution changes when the instrument and statute permit such action. If decanting authority is unclear or if beneficiaries object, a petition may still be necessary to achieve the desired change. When decanting is available and properly documented, it provides a nonjudicial alternative that can be faster and less public than a court petition. Careful analysis ensures decanting is executed in a way that protects trustee duties and beneficiary rights.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will consider their concerns as part of the petition process. Objections may raise issues about the settlor’s intent, potential harm to beneficiaries, or procedural deficiencies such as inadequate notice. The court will weigh the objection evidence against the petition’s supporting documentation and legal arguments before deciding whether to grant the requested change. Resolving objections may involve negotiation, additional evidence, or limited hearings to address specific factual disputes. In some cases, a mediated agreement can reconcile differences without a protracted contested hearing. Preparation and careful presentation of evidence are key to overcoming objections and obtaining a clear court order that reconciles competing interests.
The cost of filing a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the case, the need for discovery, the number of interested parties, and whether the matter is contested. Filing fees, costs for serving notice, and expenses associated with obtaining and preparing documentary evidence all contribute to the total. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation are typically less expensive than contested matters involving hearings and extensive legal briefing. We provide clients with an initial assessment of expected costs after reviewing the trust and related documents. Where possible, we explore alternatives that may reduce expense, such as beneficiary agreements or trustee-authorized actions, while ensuring any chosen approach provides durable and enforceable results for the trust’s administration.
For an initial consultation about a trust modification, bring the original trust document and any amendments, related wills or pour-over documents, and records of asset ownership such as deeds, account statements, and beneficiary designations. Also provide any correspondence, drafts, or notes that suggest the settlor’s intentions or identify potential drafting mistakes. These materials help evaluate whether a petition, restatement, or other action is appropriate. If you have questions about beneficiaries, trustee actions, or creditor claims, bring contact information and any notices or communications you have received. The more information available at the outset, the quicker we can evaluate likely options, outline procedural steps, and estimate timelines and costs for pursuing a modification petition or an alternative solution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas