If you are considering changes to a living trust in Paramount, a trust modification petition may be the right path to adjust distributions, update fiduciary appointments, or correct drafting errors. A petition filed in the appropriate probate or superior court can address formal obstacles that prevent otherwise acceptable changes from taking effect. This guide explains how petitions work, when they are needed, and what documentation and testimony typically support a successful request. We also outline options available to settlors, trustees, beneficiaries, and personal representatives to help you make informed decisions about trust structure and administration.
Trust modification petitions can arise from a wide range of circumstances, including changed family dynamics, tax planning needs, or ambiguous trust language that creates administration problems. When informal amendment is not possible, a court petition can clarify intent, remove or replace trustees, or correct technical errors without undermining the settlor’s overall plan. This page focuses on the procedural steps, evidence considered by the court, and practical strategies for preparing a petition in Los Angeles County. It also describes how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approach these matters for clients in Paramount and surrounding areas.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s original intent while adapting to new circumstances that could otherwise frustrate the trust’s operation. Successful petitions can resolve ambiguity, allow changes to trustee appointments, and authorize distributions that reflect current family or financial realities. Court review adds a layer of formal validation that can prevent future disputes among beneficiaries. This process can also correct drafting oversights that would otherwise delay administration. Using a petition can reduce long-term costs and conflict by addressing issues proactively, providing clarity for trustees, beneficiaries, and successor fiduciaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients across California with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters, bringing a focus on clear communication and careful preparation. Our team works to understand the background of each trust, the settlor’s goals, and the relationships among interested parties. We prepare petitions, gather supporting affidavits, and coordinate with courts in Los Angeles County. Our goal is to secure timely resolutions that align with the settlor’s intent while minimizing adversarial proceedings and unnecessary expense for families in Paramount and nearby communities.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when direct amendment is not possible or when a neutral determination is needed. Reasons for filing can include ambiguities in trust language, mistakes in execution, incapacity of a settlor, or conflicts among beneficiaries. The court examines evidence such as the trust instrument, declaration of settlor intent, testimony from witnesses, and related estate planning documents. Outcomes may include judicial clarification, authorization of modifications, or directions for trustees to follow to honor the settlor’s probable intent.
The petition process typically begins with careful fact gathering and drafting to frame the legal issues clearly for the court, including the remedy sought and supporting authorities. Local court rules in Los Angeles County can dictate filing requirements, notice procedures, and timelines. Interested parties usually receive notice and an opportunity to respond, and courts favor solutions that uphold settlor intent while protecting beneficiary rights. When contested, hearings may be necessary, but many petitions resolve through negotiation or stipulation, preserving relationships and reducing litigation costs.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change, interpret, or otherwise adjudicate matters related to an existing trust when informal remedies are unavailable or disputed. This can include correcting drafting errors, resolving ambiguous provisions, confirming the validity of consent-based amendments, or addressing situations where the settlor is incapacitated. The petition sets forth factual background, legal arguments, and the relief requested, and is supported by declarations, exhibits, and sometimes testimony. The goal is to obtain an order that clarifies rights and duties so trustees and beneficiaries can carry out the settlor’s plan with legal certainty.
Successful trust modification petitions require a clear statement of facts, a persuasive explanation of the requested change, and evidence showing that the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or corrects a legal defect. Essential documents often include the trust instrument, related wills or pour-over wills, powers of attorney, prior amendments, and affidavits from those with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions. Procedural steps include filing the petition, serving notice on interested parties, responding to any opposition, and presenting supporting evidence at a hearing if needed. Courts evaluate authority, procedural compliance, and the impact on beneficiaries.
Understanding commonly used terms can make the petition process more accessible. This glossary explains important words and concepts frequently encountered in trust modification matters, including the roles of settlor and trustee, documents like pour-over wills and certification of trust, and court procedures such as Heggstad and trust modification petitions. Clear definitions help parties prepare accurate filings and communicate effectively with the court and other stakeholders involved in administering or changing trust arrangements.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it with the intent to establish terms for management and distribution. The settlor’s documented intent, statements, and relevant estate planning documents are central to petitions seeking modification or interpretation of the trust. Courts look to the settlor’s expressed objectives when deciding whether a requested change aligns with original purposes. Evidence may include the trust instrument, contemporaneous notes, and testimony from witnesses who understood the settlor’s intentions at the time of trust formation.
A trust amendment is a formal written change made to a trust instrument by the settlor according to the amendment provisions in the trust. When the settlor followed the trust’s amendment procedures, a separate amendment document can alter terms without judicial intervention. However, when an amendment cannot be executed due to incapacity or a dispute exists about its validity, a trust modification petition may be necessary for the court to confirm or implement what the settlor intended. Documentation and clear proof of intent are important in these circumstances.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for beneficiaries. Trustees owe fiduciary duties such as loyalty and prudence, and petitions often involve requests to remove, replace, or clarify trustee powers. When trustee conduct is questioned or a trustee is unable or unwilling to serve, a petition can ask the court for instructions or a change in fiduciary appointments. Courts consider the best interests of beneficiaries and the settlor’s directions when making decisions about trustee matters.
A Heggstad petition addresses the situation where assets remain in the decedent’s name rather than being transferred into a trust before death. Named for a controlling California decision, this type of petition asks the court to determine whether certain assets should be treated as trust property and transferred according to trust terms. The court examines intent and circumstances surrounding asset ownership at death. Filing a Heggstad petition can be essential for ensuring that remaining assets are distributed according to the trust rather than through probate.
When changes to a trust are needed, parties can consider several routes: informal amendment by the settlor, mutual agreement and consent among beneficiaries and trustees, or a court petition to modify or interpret the trust. Informal amendment is simplest when available, but incapacity or disputes can make it unavailable. Consent agreements can be effective if all interest holders agree and legal requirements permit. When formal resolution is required, a petition provides a court-sanctioned remedy that clarifies rights and duties. Choosing the most appropriate path depends on the trust language, settlor capacity, and the presence of conflicting interests.
If the settlor retains capacity and the trust’s terms permit amendment, a direct amendment is often the most efficient path. This approach avoids judicial costs and public court records, allowing the settlor to implement changes quickly. Preparing a clear amendment that follows the trust’s formalities, and ensuring proper execution and witness or notary requirements, preserves the settlor’s control. Trustees and beneficiaries benefit from timely updates that reflect current intentions without the delay and expense associated with court petitions, provided there are no competing claims or ambiguities that require judicial clarification.
When all beneficiaries and other interested parties agree about a change and consent is legally sufficient, they may execute a written agreement or amendment to effectuate the desired modification. This cooperative approach can resolve issues without involving the court, preserving family relationships and reducing expense. Proper documentation and legal review help ensure that the agreement complies with trust provisions and state law, and that creditor and third-party rights are addressed. When consent is unavailable or contested, court intervention may become necessary to resolve disputes.
When a trust contains ambiguous language or drafting errors that could lead to different interpretations, filing a petition provides a formal mechanism for the court to decide how the trust should operate. Judicial resolution offers enforceable clarity and reduces the risk of future disputes among beneficiaries and trustees. Preparing a petition requires careful assembly of documentary evidence, witness statements, and legal argument tailored to local court requirements, ensuring the court has the necessary information to reach a reasoned decision that aligns with the settlor’s intent and the interests of beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries disagree about how the trust should be interpreted or administered, or when a trustee’s actions are questioned, a court proceeding may be the most reliable way to resolve the conflict. A petition can seek instructions, removal or replacement of a trustee, or specific directives to avoid mismanagement. Courts assess evidence and balance interests to reach decisions that protect beneficiaries while preserving the settlor’s intent. A well-prepared petition helps ensure all parties receive proper notice and the court has a complete factual record to guide its ruling.
A comprehensive, court-ready approach to trust modification petitions increases the likelihood of a clear, enforceable outcome. When issues are complex or contested, investing time in gathering precise documents, securing credible declarations, and addressing potential defenses can shorten litigation and reduce the risk of remand or further disputes. Courts respond well to concise presentation of facts and legal authorities that highlight the settlor’s intent. This approach also helps trustees and beneficiaries better understand their roles moving forward, reducing administrative uncertainty and the likelihood of future litigation.
Comprehensive preparation can also save money over the long term by avoiding repeated court appearances and protracted disputes that drain estate assets. When a petition resolves latent issues such as improperly titled assets or ambiguous fiduciary duties, subsequent administration proceeds more smoothly. Thoughtful documentation and settlement-focused negotiation often result in agreements that preserve family relationships while securing a practical resolution. This strategic perspective balances legal rigor with sensitivity to family dynamics and financial stewardship.
When a court issues clear orders in response to a trust modification petition, trustees receive authoritative direction that reduces hesitation about distributions and administrative decisions. Beneficiaries gain confidence that their rights are protected under court oversight, which can decrease conflict and promote compliance. Judicial clarification resolves uncertainty about interpretation, successor appointments, or asset treatment, enabling trustees to carry out their duties with legal backing. This clarity helps avoid contested actions and supports timely, organized administration of trust assets for the benefit of intended recipients.
By addressing ambiguous provisions and disputed issues through a formal petition, parties can minimize the chances of subsequent litigation that might arise from unresolved questions. A final court determination provides legal closure and can deter later challenges by establishing a clear record of intent and judicial reasoning. This forward-looking approach preserves estate assets and reduces legal fees over time. It also helps families move forward with confidence that the trust will be administered in accordance with a court order that reflects the settlor’s intentions and applicable law.
Begin by assembling all relevant documents, including the original trust instrument, amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Also collect financial statements, asset titles, and records of transfers to the trust. Clear and well-organized documentation strengthens a petition and reduces discovery disputes. Early attention to evidentiary matters allows for efficient drafting and can identify areas where additional declarations or witness statements are needed. Being thorough early helps streamline the court process and supports a persuasive presentation of the facts.
Evaluate whether the desired outcome can be achieved through an internal amendment, beneficiary consent, or by rescinding prior transactions if permitted, rather than initiating litigation. When formal action is necessary, assess venue, timing, and likely costs to choose the most efficient forum and strategy. Preparing for potential objections and anticipating what evidence the court will require helps avoid unexpected delays. Thoughtful planning may produce a less adversarial solution that meets the settlor’s goals while conserving estate assets and preserving family relationships.
You may consider a trust modification petition when the trust contains ambiguous provisions, when assets are not properly titled in the trust, or when the settlor’s instructions were not captured accurately in drafting. Situations such as remarriage, changes in beneficiary circumstances, or the need to appoint a new trustee can also prompt a petition. Similarly, when the settlor becomes incapacitated and intended changes were not executed, a petition can provide a lawful path to align administration with known wishes. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent, so careful documentation and witness statements are important.
A petition can also be appropriate when there are concerns about trustee conduct or when a trustee needs authoritative direction to act on distributions or investments. If trust assets are mixed with personal assets or titled incorrectly, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to clarify ownership and effectuate distributions according to the trust. Considering a petition early, before disputes escalate, often yields better outcomes by preserving estate resources and fostering cooperative resolutions when possible, while ensuring that the settlor’s objectives are realized.
Typical circumstances include a settlor’s incapacity preventing execution of an amendment, ambiguous or conflicting trust provisions, asset titling errors, and trustee disputes. Changes in family structures such as divorce or the birth of new descendants, as well as tax planning adjustments, can also trigger the need for court intervention when other remedies are unavailable. Sometimes clerical or drafting mistakes produce results contrary to the settlor’s likely intent, and a petition becomes the best way to correct the trust while preserving its original purpose and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
When the settlor lacks capacity to execute a formal amendment, interested parties may seek a court order to implement changes consistent with the settlor’s prior statements or evident intent. Declarations from family members or professionals who understood the settlor’s plan, along with contemporaneous notes or documents, can support such a petition. Courts look for clear evidence of the settlor’s intent and will act to honor those decisions when legal standards are met, balancing the interests of beneficiaries and the integrity of written instruments.
If assets intended for the trust were never retitled or otherwise transferred, a Heggstad petition or similar proceeding can request that the court treat those assets as trust property based on the settlor’s clear intent. This commonly occurs with bank accounts, real property, or retirement accounts where transfers were incomplete. Documentation such as transfer forms, beneficiary designations, and estate planning correspondence helps establish the settlor’s intent and supports the court’s authority to correct ownership records or order distribution under the trust terms.
When beneficiaries challenge trustee decisions or disagree over interpretation of trust provisions, a petition can request court instructions, removal of a trustee, or resolution of contested provisions. Evidence of trustee conduct, financial records, and written communications can inform the court’s decision. Formal adjudication provides a binding resolution that protects beneficiary rights and sets a clear course for administration. Courts prefer solutions that align with the settlor’s wishes while ensuring fair treatment of all interested parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance and representation for clients in Paramount and throughout Los Angeles County who face trust modification issues. We help evaluate whether a petition is appropriate, prepare filings, coordinate notices, and represent clients at hearings when necessary. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, careful evidence gathering, and practical solutions aimed at preserving estate assets and honoring the settlor’s intent. Clients can expect responsive support through each step of the petition process.
Choosing legal representation for a trust modification petition means partnering with an attorney who understands local court practices and trust law. We provide focused assistance in documenting settlor intent, preparing thorough petitions, and advising clients about alternatives to litigation. Our team communicates clearly about likely timelines and procedural requirements, helping clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue a petition or seek cooperative solutions with other parties. We strive to balance legal rigor with sensitivity to family dynamics.
Our work includes analyzing trust instruments, collecting supporting affidavits, coordinating required notices, and preparing the legal arguments courts expect in Los Angeles County. For trustees and beneficiaries, we offer practical recommendations to minimize administrative disruption while protecting rights. Where disputes arise, we advocate for resolution through negotiation when possible, and present concise, well-supported petitions when court intervention is necessary. Our goal is to obtain clear, enforceable orders that facilitate proper trust administration and distribution according to the settlor’s plan.
We also assist with related estate planning documents often implicated in trust petitions, including pour-over wills, powers of attorney, certifications of trust, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations. Coordinating these documents ensures coherent estate administration and reduces future uncertainty about asset treatment and fiduciary authority. Clients in Paramount receive practical guidance tailored to their circumstances, with the aim of resolving trust issues efficiently and preserving estate value for beneficiaries while following applicable California law and local court procedures.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust and related estate planning documents, followed by a meeting to clarify goals and identify interested parties. We then gather evidence, prepare a petition tailored to the specific relief sought, and ensure compliance with Los Angeles County filing and notice requirements. If possible, we pursue negotiated resolutions to avoid contested hearings. When court proceedings are necessary, we present a focused case supported by declarations, documents, and legal argument designed to obtain clear, enforceable orders that accomplish the settlor’s intentions.
The first step is a diligent case assessment to determine whether a petition is appropriate and what relief should be sought. This includes identifying the settlor, trustees, beneficiaries, and any relevant transactions or amendments, and collecting the trust instrument, related wills, powers of attorney, and financial records. We evaluate potential procedural hurdles and gather declarations from witnesses with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent. This foundation ensures the petition addresses the court’s concerns and presents persuasive factual support for the requested modification.
During the initial consultation, we discuss the trust’s history, the specific problem to be resolved, and the client’s objectives. We outline possible solutions, including informal amendments, consent agreements, or a petition, and provide a realistic assessment of costs, timing, and likely outcomes. This session helps prioritize actions and identify documents or witnesses to support the petition. Clear planning at this stage makes subsequent filings more efficient and reduces the risk of avoidable procedural defects when seeking court relief.
We identify and obtain the documentary and testimonial evidence necessary to support the petition, including the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, correspondence, and records of asset transfers. We also prepare declarations from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intentions or the circumstances surrounding asset ownership. Well-prepared declarations and exhibits help the court understand the factual background and justify the requested modification or clarification, improving the petition’s prospects for a favorable decision.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file with the appropriate court and serve notice on all interested parties in accordance with California probate rules and local requirements. Proper notice is essential to ensure parties have an opportunity to respond and to comply with statutory procedures. We monitor deadlines for responses, coordinate with opposing counsel if parties seek to negotiate, and address any procedural objections promptly. Attention to these procedural details reduces delays and increases the likelihood of a clear, timely resolution.
We prepare and serve statutory notices on beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties, ensuring service meets jurisdictional standards. We track response periods and evaluate any objections or competing petitions that may arise. When possible, we use the response window to engage in settlement discussions or stipulations that can streamline the court process. If opposition develops, we promptly analyze the objections and gather additional evidence or legal argument to address the contested issues and support our client’s requested relief.
Procedural or jurisdictional defects can derail a petition, so we carefully confirm venue, standing, and compliance with filing requirements. We review whether additional approvals, consents, or bond requirements are necessary and address any jurisdictional challenges early. Correcting procedural issues before hearings saves time and resources. If the court requests supplemental materials or clarification, we respond promptly to avoid continuances and present a complete record when the matter proceeds to hearing.
Once the court hears the petition, it may issue an order granting, modifying, or denying the requested relief. When an order is entered, we assist with implementing the court’s directives, such as re-titling assets, filing updated certification of trust documents, or instructing trustees about new distribution instructions. We also advise on any follow-up actions beneficiaries or trustees must take to comply with the order, including updating related estate planning documents to reflect approved changes and ensuring administrative steps are completed in a timely manner.
After the court issues its order, we ensure the order is properly recorded and served on relevant institutions, such as banks or title companies, so trustees can carry out authorized transactions. We prepare any ancillary documents required by financial institutions or governmental entities to effectuate transfers and distributions ordered by the court. If enforcement becomes necessary, we assist in obtaining compliance through further court filings or negotiated resolutions, always aiming to execute the settlor’s plan with as little disruption as possible.
Following implementation of a court order, we advise clients on remaining administrative matters, including updating beneficiary records, preparing revised trust certifications, and ensuring successor trustees understand their responsibilities. We review whether related estate documents should be updated to reduce future ambiguity and help facilitate smooth ongoing administration. These final steps complete the process and help prevent future disputes by creating a clear, documented path forward consistent with the settlor’s intentions and the court’s directives.
Trust modification petitions are commonly filed when the trust contains ambiguous language, when the settlor lacks capacity to sign an amendment, or when assets intended for the trust were never properly transferred. Other reasons include disputes among beneficiaries, trustee conflicts, or clerical mistakes that frustrate the settlor’s intended distributions. In those situations, a petition asks the court to clarify intent, correct drafting errors, or provide directions to trustees so that the trust can be administered in accordance with the settlor’s plan. Preparing a petition involves documenting the factual background, assembling supporting evidence such as the trust instrument and relevant communications, and explaining the legal basis for the requested change. The court reviews this record, applies statutory and case law, and issues an order that provides clear guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. Where possible, parties often attempt to resolve differences through negotiation before a hearing.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property even though title was not changed before the settlor’s death. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent to include those assets in the trust, such as transfer paperwork, beneficiary designations, and contemporaneous statements. The court examines whether the settlor intended the trust to own the assets and whether equity favors treating them as trust property to effectuate the settlor’s plan. If the court grants a Heggstad petition, it will issue an order directing the transfer or distribution of assets consistent with trust terms. This helps avoid probate for assets that were intended to pass through the trust, and provides a judicially enforceable mechanism to complete estate administration according to the settlor’s wishes.
Courts consider the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent or the circumstances surrounding asset transfers. Financial records, title documents, and correspondence that show planning steps or instructions are also persuasive. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intention and whether enforcement of the original language would produce results contrary to that intent. The credibility of supporting declarations and the clarity of documentary evidence are important. Courts also consider statutory rules and precedent when deciding whether to permit a modification, and they weigh the impact on beneficiaries to ensure the order is equitable and consistent with the settlor’s purposes.
Yes, beneficiaries may challenge a trust modification petition by filing objections or appearing at hearings to present contrary evidence. Challenges commonly assert that the requested change conflicts with the trust’s plain language, that the settlor’s intent has been misrepresented, or that procedural defects exist in the petition. The court will consider competing evidence and legal arguments from all interested parties before making a decision. When disputes occur, the court may hold hearings to examine testimony and documents and may ask for supplemental briefing. If a petitioner lacks sufficient proof, the court may deny the request or limit relief. In all cases, the judicial process provides an opportunity for each side to present its position and for the court to reach a binding resolution.
The timeline for a petition varies depending on case complexity, the need for additional evidence, and whether the matter is contested. Some petitions can be resolved through stipulated agreements and short court calendars, while contested matters may require multiple hearings and extend over several months. Local court schedules and procedural requirements in Los Angeles County can also affect timing, as can the need for personal service and response periods for interested parties. Prompt and thorough preparation can shorten the process. Clear documentation and early engagement with interested parties may lead to settlements that avoid protracted litigation. When hearings are necessary, having a complete factual record and well-organized legal arguments helps the court reach a timely decision.
Alternatives include a direct amendment executed by the settlor if capacity remains, or a written agreement among beneficiaries and trustees that effectuates the desired change where legal standards permit. Utilizing beneficiary consent and careful documentation can often implement adjustments without court involvement. In addition, administrative steps such as re-titling assets or updating beneficiary designations may accomplish planning goals when a petition is unnecessary. When those options are unavailable or contested, informal negotiation and mediation between parties can sometimes produce a practical solution. If disputes persist, a petition remains the formal legal avenue to obtain a definitive court order that resolves the matter for all interested parties.
Court orders issued in response to trust modification petitions generally become part of the public record, which means that the contents and the court’s rulings are accessible unless sealed or restricted by court order. Parties often discuss confidentiality concerns with counsel to evaluate whether sealing portions of the record or redacting sensitive information is feasible under local rules. In many cases, courts balance transparency with privacy interests and may limit public disclosure where appropriate and permitted by statute. If privacy is a significant concern, early discussions about confidentiality and the possibility of stipulations or agreed orders can sometimes reduce the extent of public filings. Counsel can advise on the practical implications of public records and strategies to manage sensitive information during the petition process.
Yes, a petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee when grounds exist, such as incapacity, inability to perform duties, or serious breaches of fiduciary duties. The petition must present evidence supporting the requested change and propose a suitable successor trustee or process for selecting one. Courts carefully weigh the settlor’s instructions, the trustee’s conduct, and the best interests of beneficiaries before granting such relief to ensure continuity and proper administration of the trust. If removal is granted, the court’s order will guide transfer of responsibilities and assets to the successor trustee and may address any accounting or restitution issues needed to protect beneficiaries. Properly documenting trustee actions and decisions strengthens the case for removal when appropriate.
Documenting assets for a petition includes gathering title documents, account statements, transfer records, beneficiary designations, and any written instructions or correspondence showing the settlor’s intent to include assets in the trust. Clear evidence that the settlor intended the trust to own certain property, or that a clerical error prevented transfer, supports petitions such as a Heggstad filing. Detailed records reduce ambiguity and make it easier for the court to grant the requested relief. Supporting declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of transfers or the settlor’s planning intent can supplement documentary proof. Collecting this evidence early and organizing it into a coherent package helps present a persuasive and efficient petition to the court.
To start the process, gather the trust instrument, any amendments or related estate planning documents, records of asset ownership and transfers, and contact information for trustees and beneficiaries. Schedule a consultation to review the documents and discuss goals and potential remedies, including whether a petition is necessary or whether alternatives may exist. A careful intake helps identify the scope of the issue and the evidence needed to support a filing. After the initial review, counsel typically prepares a plan that includes required documents and witness declarations, outlines the filing and notice process, and estimates likely timelines and costs. Timely preparation and clear communication with interested parties increase the chances of an efficient resolution, whether through agreement or court action.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas