A Heggstad petition can be an important tool for families in Pico Rivera who need to transfer assets into a trust after a decedent’s death when title did not transfer as intended. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand how a petition to the court can confirm trust ownership and avoid a lengthy probate process. This guide explains the Heggstad procedure in clear, practical terms, including what documents are needed, how the court evaluates claims, and typical timelines in Los Angeles County. If you are handling a trust or estate issue, this overview will help you take measured steps toward resolving property transfer complications efficiently and respectfully.
Many California families encounter situations where assets were meant to be held in a revocable living trust but remained in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that property is an asset of the trust despite the lack of a recorded transfer. This process can prevent assets from passing through a more public and often slower probate proceeding. In Pico Rivera and surrounding communities, clients benefit from tailored guidance about required affidavits, declarations, and title documentation. Understanding these elements helps families preserve privacy, reduce delays, and move forward with distributing assets according to the trust maker’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition provides a pathway for confirming trust ownership when paperwork or recorded deeds are incomplete, ambiguous, or overlooked. By asking the court to recognize that particular assets belong to a trust, beneficiaries can avoid probate and keep estate affairs private. This can be particularly helpful for real property, bank accounts, or retirement assets that were intended to fund a pour-over will or other trust instrument. Filing such a petition can streamline transfer to successor trustees and reduce administrative friction, allowing distribution to proceed in accordance with the trust document while minimizing public court oversight and unnecessary delay.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman have provided estate planning and trust administration services to California residents for years, including matters in Los Angeles County and Pico Rivera. Our approach emphasizes careful analysis of the trust document, calibration of procedural steps, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries. We assist with gathering declaration evidence, preparing pleadings, and coordinating with title companies and courts to resolve ownership issues. Clients value our steady guidance through sensitive post-death matters and our practical focus on achieving timely, cost-effective outcomes while respecting the wishes of the decedent and the needs of the family.
A Heggstad petition is filed in probate court to establish that certain property is an asset of a trust despite there being no recorded transfer into the trust’s name. The petition typically includes declarations from persons with knowledge of the trust maker’s intent, copies of the trust instrument and related documents, and proof of attempts to transfer title where applicable. The court will evaluate whether clear and convincing evidence supports the claim that the property was intended to be trust property. This process can be used for real estate, bank accounts, and other assets, and it helps trustees take control of assets for distribution according to the trust terms while reducing the need for formal probate administration.
In Pico Rivera and the broader Los Angeles County area, courts expect thorough documentation and credible declarations to support a Heggstad petition. Typical supporting documents include the trust instrument, any related assignment or transfer documents, beneficiary designations, and communications that show the trust maker’s intent. The petition may also explain why a deed or title was never changed, such as oversight during estate planning or the existence of a pour-over will linking assets to the trust. Proper preparation reduces the risk of contested proceedings and increases the chance that the court will recognize the trust’s claim to the assets without protracted litigation.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain property should be treated as if it had been transferred into a trust during the decedent’s lifetime. The remedy addresses situations where title instruments were never updated but the trust maker clearly intended the trust to own the asset. The petition sets forth factual evidence demonstrating intent and often requests that the court order title be reformed or a declaration be recorded so that successors can administer and distribute the property through the trust. The goal is to honor the decedent’s estate plan while minimizing unnecessary probate steps and public disclosure of family affairs.
Successful petitions depend on assembling persuasive documentation and following court procedures accurately. Key elements include a certified copy of the trust instrument, declarations from people who can attest to the decedent’s intent, any attempted transfer documents, a proposed order for the court, and attachments such as deeds or beneficiary forms. The process involves filing the petition in the appropriate county court, serving interested parties, and providing the court with sufficient evidence to find that the property was intended to be trust property. Courts may set hearings to evaluate objections, and once granted, the order typically enables transfer or recording of title in the name of the trustee.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the Heggstad process. Terms like revocable living trust, trustee, successor trustee, pour-over will, and declaration are used frequently in petitions and court documents. Knowing what each term means and how it relates to transfer of assets makes it easier to gather the right paperwork and explain the situation to the court. Familiarity with these terms also helps parties recognize when additional filings, such as trust modification petitions or Heggstad motions, may be necessary to effectuate the trust maker’s intentions.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning document created during a person’s lifetime that holds title to assets for management and distribution. The trust maker retains the right to amend or revoke the trust while alive, and upon death, assets are typically distributed to named beneficiaries by a successor trustee without probate. Trusts are often used to maintain privacy and streamline post-death transfers. When property intended for the trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition may be used to confirm that those assets belong to the trust and should be administered accordingly.
A pour-over will operates in tandem with a trust, directing any assets that were not transferred into the trust during the decedent’s life to be transferred to the trust at death. While a pour-over will can funnel remaining assets into a trust, those assets may still be subject to probate unless there is a successful Heggstad petition or other mechanism to identify them as trust property. The will serves as a safety net for items overlooked during lifetime planning, and the combination of a trust and pour-over will aims to ensure that the trust’s distribution plan is ultimately carried out.
A successor trustee is the individual or entity designated in a trust to take over management and distribution of trust assets after the trust maker’s death or incapacity. The successor trustee gathers assets, pays debts, and distributes property according to the trust terms. When assets are not properly titled in the trust’s name, the successor trustee may seek a Heggstad petition to have the court confirm that those assets are trust property, enabling the trustee to carry out the trust maker’s wishes without opening a broad probate estate and without delay in transferring title.
A declaration of intent is a sworn statement by someone with knowledge about the trust maker’s wishes and actions, typically included with a Heggstad petition. Declarations may describe conversations, documents, or practices that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to have specific property held in the trust. Courts consider these declarations as evidence when deciding whether to recognize property as trust assets despite the absence of formal title transfer. Clear, consistent declarations that align with the trust instrument strengthen a petition and assist the court in rendering a favorable determination.
When property intended for a trust remains in a decedent’s name, interested parties have several options, including probate administration, informal attempts to transfer title, or filing a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership. Probate can be time-consuming and public, whereas a successful Heggstad petition helps move assets into trust administration with less disclosure. In some cases, a quiet title action or trust modification petition may be relevant, but those options address different legal questions. Choosing the right path depends on the asset type, the strength of supporting documentation, and whether heirs or creditors are likely to challenge ownership claims.
A limited approach may succeed when the decedent left clear, contemporaneous documentation showing intent to place the asset in the trust, such as a trust instrument explicitly describing the asset, contemporaneous correspondence, or recorded documents that align with the trust maker’s plan. If title issues are clerical or caused by oversight and all beneficiaries agree, the successor trustee may complete administrative transfers or file a simple declaration and notice to interested parties. This path can save time and expense when there is no credible dispute and the evidence strongly supports that the property belonged to the trust.
When beneficiaries and potential heirs are in agreement about the trust’s terms and the intended disposition of assets, a cooperative approach can often resolve title issues without prolonged court intervention. Parties may sign declarations, consents, or corrective deeds that support a trustee’s position and allow for recordation or transfer. This collaborative path reduces costs and emotional strain while preserving family relationships. Even when matters are amicable, proper documentation is essential to ensure the transfer is legally enforceable and to avoid future challenges from other interested parties.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when beneficiaries disagree about ownership or when title issues are complicated by multiple heirs, liens, or unclear conveyances. In such cases, filing a Heggstad petition with supporting declarations and potentially engaging in contested hearings may be required to obtain a definitive court determination. Addressing objections, coordinating with title companies, and resolving competing claims often involve careful legal strategy and thorough evidence collection to present a persuasive case that aligns with the trust’s written terms and applicable California trust law.
When large real property holdings or high-value assets are at stake, the potential consequences of an incomplete transfer justify a rigorous approach. A full proceeding ensures the court reviews extensive documentation and issues a ruling that allows the trustee to manage and distribute the property without ongoing title disputes. This approach can protect the estate from later challenges by creditors or heirs and provides clear authority for successors to act on behalf of beneficiaries. Thorough preparation and careful legal filings reduce the risk of future litigation and secure a dependable path to asset distribution.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title issues typically provides greater certainty for trustees and beneficiaries. By assembling detailed evidence, addressing potential objections proactively, and seeking a court order when necessary, parties can minimize the likelihood of future disputes. Secure court findings facilitate clear recordation of title, allow trustees to manage assets confidently, and reduce the risk that assets will revert to probate administration. For families in Pico Rivera, this peace of mind preserves the trust maker’s privacy and ensures distributions occur as intended, with legal backing that stands up to scrutiny.
Comprehensive handling also often leads to more efficient long-term administration. While the initial preparation may involve greater documentation and coordination, obtaining definitive court resolution prevents recurring legal challenges and makes it easier for trustees to sell, refinance, or transfer assets. This method protects beneficiary interests and simplifies interactions with banks, title companies, and public agencies. In cases involving complex assets or competing claims, the assurance of a clear judicial determination outweighs short-term costs and supports smoother estate settlement in the months and years following the trust maker’s death.
When the court issues an order recognizing property as trust assets, that order creates a durable record that enhances title clarity and enforceability. Trustees can rely on the order to complete transactions, satisfy creditors, and distribute assets without the threat of recurring litigation from claimants who might later challenge informal transfers. This certainty provides practical benefits for real estate transactions, beneficiary distributions, and estate tax matters. A clear judicial finding reduces administrative burdens on trustees and preserves the trust maker’s intentions for the beneficiaries named in the trust document.
By addressing potential conflicts thoroughly and securing a court determination when appropriate, families significantly lower the risk of future disputes over asset ownership. This approach helps avoid re-litigation of the same issues and streamlines future estate administration tasks. When title and distribution instructions are clarified through the court, trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with transactions and distributions without lingering uncertainty. The up-front investment in a rigorous legal process often produces savings over time by preventing litigation that could otherwise arise from unclear transfers or contested beneficiary claims.
Collecting clear, contemporaneous documentation can significantly strengthen a petition. This includes a certified copy of the trust instrument, any deeds or assignments, bank statements, beneficiary designation forms, and written communications that demonstrate the trust maker’s intent. Declarations from individuals who can describe how the asset was managed or intended to be included in the trust are also important. Organizing this evidence early helps the court understand the full context and reduces the risk of delay or dispute when seeking recognition that property belonged to the trust.
Work with title companies, banks, and financial institutions early to determine what documentation they will require to accept court orders or record corrected title. Title companies may request certified court orders, affidavits, or corrected deeds, while banks may need proofs of authority for successor trustees. Anticipating these requirements and obtaining the right forms in advance reduces processing delays and ensures a smoother transition of assets into trust administration. Early coordination also helps avoid repeated requests for additional paperwork from third parties.
Filing a Heggstad petition is appropriate when assets intended for a trust were not transferred into the trust’s name before death and probate would otherwise be required. Homeowners, account holders, and trustees often choose this route to preserve privacy, reduce the complexities associated with probate, and ensure the trust’s distribution plan is carried out. When documentation supports the trust maker’s intent, a court declaration can enable prompt title correction and allow successor trustees to manage or distribute assets in accordance with the trust terms, reducing administrative obstacles for families in Los Angeles County.
Another reason to consider a petition is to protect the estate from future disputes. A court order recognizing trust property creates an authoritative record that assists trustees in handling transactions like sales, refinances, or distributions. This can be particularly important when dealing with lenders, title companies, or institutions that require legal proof of trustee authority. Seeking judicial confirmation also minimizes the chance that assets will later be challenged and ensures beneficiaries receive their intended distributions without protracted legal costs or public probate proceedings.
Common circumstances include real estate left in the decedent’s name but intended to fund the trust, bank accounts that were not retitled, or retirement accounts with unclear beneficiary designations that should have been coordinated with trust planning. Other triggers include clerical errors, transfers that were attempted but not properly recorded, or assets acquired late in life that were never retitled. In these scenarios, successors may seek court recognition through a Heggstad petition to avoid probate and ensure the trust’s distribution instructions are followed.
A frequent issue arises when a deed intended to place real property into the trust was never recorded or was incorrectly prepared, leaving the property titled in the decedent’s name at death. In these situations, a successor trustee may file a Heggstad petition to demonstrate that the property was meant to be trust-owned, supplying declarations and the trust document to support the claim. A successful petition enables the trustee to effectuate title transfer, sell the property if necessary, or otherwise administer it under the trust’s terms without resorting to full probate.
Accounts that were intended to be owned by the trust but remain in the decedent’s personal name can present obstacles to administration. Financial institutions often require clear proof of trustee authority or a court order to release funds. A Heggstad petition may be used to demonstrate that the account should be considered trust property, accompanied by account statements, trust instruments, and declarations about the trust maker’s intent. Resolving these matters through the court simplifies access and ensures the successor trustee can manage or distribute assets as contemplated by the trust.
When the decedent acquired new assets near the time of death, there may have been insufficient time to retitle those assets into the trust. This timing gap can leave items such as newly purchased real estate or recently opened accounts outside the trust. A Heggstad petition addresses this by asking the court to recognize that the decedent intended those assets to be subject to the trust. Presenting contemporaneous documents and reliable witness declarations often helps the court grant relief so those assets can be administered under the trust.
Serving Pico Rivera and nearby communities in Los Angeles County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical legal help for trustees, beneficiaries, and families dealing with trust title issues. We assist with preparing petitions, assembling declarations and exhibits, and communicating with courts, title companies, and financial institutions. Our goal is to minimize delays and facilitate orderly management or distribution of assets while preserving family privacy. If you face property that should have been in a trust but remains in a decedent’s name, we can help you evaluate the best path forward and take steps toward a favorable outcome.
The firm focuses on practical solutions for trust administration and post-death asset transfer issues, with experience handling matters across California. We counsel trustees and beneficiaries on gathering necessary documents, preparing persuasive declarations, and presenting petitions that courts in Los Angeles County will consider. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with families, attention to procedural details, and coordination with third parties such as title companies and banks to ease transfers and reduce delays in estate settlement processes.
We aim to help clients navigate the emotional and technical complexities that arise after a loved one’s death. By carefully reviewing trust instruments, identifying supporting evidence, and explaining available legal options, we help trustees move forward with confidence. From drafting petitions and proposed orders to handling service and court filings, we guide clients through each procedural step while seeking to minimize cost and public exposure that often accompanies probate proceedings.
When third-party entities require formal documentation to transfer title or release assets, we help prepare court-ready materials and coordinate the process to meet those requirements. Whether working on unrecorded deeds, bank account access, or complex title questions, our goal is to achieve a durable resolution that allows trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust maker’s wishes, preserving family resources and reducing administrative burdens.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust document and relevant asset records to assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then identify necessary declarations, gather supporting exhibits, and prepare the petition and proposed order for court review. The firm handles service on interested parties and responds to inquiries from title companies and other stakeholders. If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the facts in a clear manner aimed at obtaining a timely court ruling that supports transfer of property into the trust for administration and distribution.
The first step involves collecting the trust instrument, relevant deeds, account statements, communications, and any previous transfer attempts. We interview trustees and witnesses to obtain declarations that explain the decedent’s intent. During this stage, we evaluate whether interested parties are likely to consent or contest and identify any competing claims or liens that must be addressed. Early diligence reduces the risk of surprises and allows us to prepare a petition based on a clear evidentiary foundation for court consideration.
We request certified copies of the trust, deeds, and transaction records from relevant institutions and recorders. Accurate copies of deeds and account statements help demonstrate the relationship between the asset and the trust. We also obtain beneficiary designations or related estate planning documents, like pour-over wills, that clarify the trust maker’s plan. This compilation of materials supports the factual assertions in the petition and makes it easier for the court and title companies to recognize the trustee’s authority.
Declarations from individuals who knew the trust maker or were involved in planning help explain the intent behind placing assets in the trust. These statements might describe conversations with the trust maker, the circumstances under which assets were acquired, or the trust maker’s routine handling of assets. Carefully drafted declarations present facts in a persuasive and credible manner for the court. We guide witnesses through what to include and how to present their observations to support the petition effectively.
After assembling the record, we prepare the Heggstad petition, supporting declarations, exhibits, and a proposed court order. The petition is filed with the probate court in the appropriate county and served on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties as required by law. Proper service and notice are essential to preserve procedural rights and to allow for objections. The court may set a hearing date to review the evidence and any responses. We handle the filing logistics and ensure compliance with local court rules to avoid delays.
We draft the petition to clearly state the factual basis for treating the property as trust assets and include exhibits such as the trust instrument and any relevant deeds or account records. Each filing is formatted to meet local court requirements, with attention to proper captioning, exhibit labeling, and proposed orders that the court can sign. Clear filings help the judge readily understand the requested relief and the evidence supporting it, improving the chances of a prompt decision in favor of the trustee’s requested determination.
Once the petition is filed, we arrange service on all required parties and monitor for any responses, objections, or motions. Timely notice preserves the court’s jurisdiction and allows other interested persons to participate. If objections arise, we assess their merits and propose ways to address them through negotiation or court argument. Managing responses proactively helps reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and can encourage early resolution through stipulation or supplemental evidence supporting the trustee’s claim.
At the hearing, the court evaluates the evidence and determines whether the property should be recognized as trust assets. If the court grants the petition, it signs an order that can be recorded or used to direct institutions to release assets to the trustee. We assist with recording the order, communicating with title companies and banks, and completing any follow-up steps such as preparing corrective deeds or facilitating transfers. Our focus is on implementing the court’s order efficiently so trustees can proceed with administration and distribution of assets.
When a hearing is necessary, we present a clear summary of documentary evidence and witness declarations to support the petition. Our goal is to demonstrate that the trust maker intended the property to be trust assets and that the requested relief is consistent with the trust’s terms. Effective presentation underscores the importance of well-organized exhibits and credible declarations. After the judge reviews the record and any objections, a written order may be issued confirming the property as belonging to the trust.
Following a favorable ruling, we prepare and record any necessary documents, such as a certified court order or corrective deed, to put title in the trustee’s name and satisfy third-party requirements. We coordinate with title companies and banks to provide the certifications they require for transactions. Ensuring that recording and third-party acceptance are handled promptly allows trustees to sell, refinance, or distribute assets according to the trust plan, reducing administrative burdens and preserving the trust maker’s wishes for the beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the judge to declare certain property belonged to the decedent’s trust despite not being formally retitled. It is typically used when assets intended for a revocable living trust were left in the decedent’s name due to oversight, clerical error, or late acquisition. The petition seeks an order confirming that the asset is trust property so that the successor trustee can manage or distribute it in keeping with the trust’s terms. This avoids treating the asset as part of a public probate estate and helps preserve the trust maker’s plan. You should consider a Heggstad petition when there is credible documentation and witness testimony demonstrating intent to hold the asset in the trust, and when probate would otherwise be required to transfer the asset. If interested parties agree and the evidence is strong, the petition can lead to a court order supporting a smooth transfer. When disputes or complex title issues exist, the petition remains a tool to obtain a final judicial determination about ownership so trustees can proceed with administration.
Timing for a Heggstad petition in Los Angeles County varies with case complexity, court schedules, and whether any party objects. Simple, uncontested matters with strong documentation may move more quickly, sometimes resolving within a few months from filing to order. More complex or contested petitions may take longer due to the need for additional evidence, extended service periods, or hearings. The timeline can also be affected by local court workloads and required notice periods for interested parties. To reduce delays, it is helpful to collect all relevant documents before filing, prepare clear declarations, and communicate with potential interested parties to encourage cooperation. When disputes arise, resolving them through negotiation or by presenting strong evidence at a hearing can help achieve a definitive ruling. Having properly prepared filings and accurate service documentation also prevents procedural issues that might otherwise prolong the process.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on a combination of documentary evidence and credible witness declarations. Essential documents often include a certified copy of the trust, deeds or attempted transfer documents if available, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence or notes that reflect the trust maker’s intent. Courts look for a consistent record demonstrating that the decedent meant the trust to own the asset. Properly labeled exhibits make it easier for the court to evaluate the claim. Witness declarations are also important and may describe conversations, the trust maker’s handling of assets, or the circumstances under which the asset should have been retitled. Declarations should be factual and specific, providing context for the asset’s relationship to the trust. When possible, obtaining corroborating documentation alongside declarations strengthens the petition and improves the chances of a favorable judicial determination.
A Heggstad petition can, in many cases, prevent the need for a separate probate administration for the assets in question by securing a court declaration that they were trust property. When the court recognizes the trust’s claim, those assets can be administered by the trustee under the trust’s terms without full probate. This keeps the matter more private and can speed up distribution. However, if other assets or disputes require probate, those matters may still proceed separately. If creditors or heirs contest the validity of the trust or ownership claims, additional proceedings may be necessary. The petition addresses the ownership issue for specific assets but does not resolve unrelated probate matters. A careful review of the estate’s overall circumstances helps determine whether a Heggstad petition will effectively avoid probate for the assets at issue or whether further filings might be required.
Notice requirements vary by jurisdiction, but generally interested parties who must be served include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law who would inherit by intestacy, and other persons with a legal interest in the asset, such as holders of recorded liens. Proper service is important to give those parties an opportunity to respond and to ensure the court’s ruling will be binding. The court will expect proof that required parties were notified according to statutory rules. In some circumstances, additional notice to known creditors or to parties listed in related estate documents may be necessary. Working with counsel helps ensure all required parties are identified and properly served to avoid challenges based on defective notice. Providing clear notice also encourages cooperation and reduces the risk of contested hearings that can lengthen the process.
Common objections to Heggstad petitions often contest whether the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust, or they assert competing claims of ownership or liens. Parties may also challenge the sufficiency of the evidence or the authority of the trustee. Addressing these objections requires thorough documentation, strong declarations, and a clear presentation of the trust instrument’s terms. When objections arise, it may be possible to resolve them through supplemental evidence or negotiation prior to a hearing. If objections cannot be resolved, the court will evaluate the competing evidence at a hearing. A well-prepared petition that anticipates potential objections and includes corroborating documentation increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In some cases, resolving disputes may involve supplemental filings, additional declarations, or stipulated orders that clarify title and trustee authority.
A certified court order recognizing property as trust assets is often sufficient for title companies and banks to accept the trustee’s authority and proceed with transfers or distributions. Title companies typically require an official court order or corrected deeds to insure title, and financial institutions may accept a court order as proof of the trustee’s right to access accounts. The exact documentation needed can vary by institution, so anticipating those requirements and including them in the petition process helps ensure a smooth transition. Coordination with the relevant institutions before filing can identify any specific forms or certifications they will require, which can then be incorporated into the petition or provided after the court’s order. Promptly recording court orders and preparing required follow-up documents helps complete transactions, such as sales or transfers, and facilitates trustee authority in managing estate affairs without unnecessary delays.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include full probate administration for assets not retitled, quiet title actions to resolve ownership, or informal transfers when all interested parties agree and institutions will cooperate without a court order. A pour-over will may bring some assets into a trust through probate, but that route tends to be more public and time-consuming. The right alternative depends on the asset type, the clarity of supporting documentation, and whether interested parties are likely to object to informal arrangements. When parties are cooperative and the evidence is strong, administrative solutions may suffice to transfer some assets. However, for real estate or institutions that insist on legal proof, a Heggstad petition often provides a more definitive and reliable resolution. Consulting with counsel helps determine which path will most efficiently and securely achieve the trust maker’s intent while minimizing costs and delays.
A successor trustee has certain powers under the trust and may begin taking steps to manage trust affairs, such as locating assets and notifying beneficiaries. However, when an asset remains titled in the decedent’s name, some institutions may not recognize the trustee’s authority until there is a court order or appropriate documentation. In those circumstances, a Heggstad petition provides the formal recognition needed to access or transfer the asset in accordance with the trust’s terms. While preliminary administrative actions are appropriate, trustees should avoid unilateral transfers of titled property without legal authority. Seeking a court determination when necessary protects the trustee from future challenges and ensures that transactions are legally valid. Early assessment of the need for a petition and careful coordination with institutions reduces the risk of acting without the documentation required by third parties.
To begin the process, gather the trust instrument, any relevant deeds, account statements, and known communications that show the decedent’s intent regarding the asset. Speak with other beneficiaries and heirs to determine whether there is likely to be agreement or objection. Early organization of these materials makes it easier to evaluate the strength of a petition and identify witnesses who can provide declarations supporting the trust claim. Contacting counsel to review the documents and suggest next steps helps ensure proper preparation and compliance with local court rules. Legal counsel can assist with drafting declarations, preparing the petition, managing service, and liaising with title companies or banks. Prompt, well-prepared action increases the likelihood of a timely court order and a smoother transfer of assets into trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas