If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Rancho Palos Verdes, a trust modification petition may be the pathway to update terms, correct drafting errors, or reflect changed family or financial circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with thoughtful review of trust documents and guidance on whether a petition to modify existing trust terms is appropriate. We explain the legal standards, timing considerations, and potential outcomes so you understand how a court-supervised modification could preserve your intentions while complying with California trust law.
Modifying a trust through a petition involves procedural steps that protect beneficiaries’ rights and ensure the court understands the requested changes. Whether you need to change trustees, update distribution provisions, correct ambiguous language, or address changes in tax or eldercare planning, a petition can be a formal way to implement those changes. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful drafting of proposed orders, and preparing the factual record the court will review, so the modification reflects current needs and minimizes future disputes among family members or other interested parties.
A trust modification petition provides a lawful process to adjust trust terms when circumstances evolve or original provisions no longer fit the grantor’s intentions. Filing a petition can secure court approval for changes that affect distributions, trustee appointments, or administrative provisions, reducing the risk of later challenges. It also creates an official record that courts and financial institutions can rely upon, which can simplify asset management and prevent confusion for trustees and beneficiaries. Thoughtful petitions can protect family harmony and ensure the trust continues to operate as intended.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handle estate planning and trust-related petitions with long-standing service to California clients. Our practice helps clients navigate petitions to modify trusts by reviewing documents, assessing legal options, and preparing the pleadings and declarations courts require. We prioritize clear explanations of potential outcomes and work to keep the process as efficient and cost-effective as possible. Clients benefit from a practical, client-focused approach aimed at resolving trust issues while respecting family dynamics and legal obligations.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a court to change the terms of an existing trust when the trust instrument does not permit the change by private agreement or when a court order is needed to correct defects. Typical reasons for a petition include clarifying ambiguous language, removing or replacing a trustee, updating beneficiaries or distribution schedules, and addressing circumstances that were unforeseeable when the trust was created. The court reviews the petition, supporting declarations, and any opposition before deciding whether to grant the requested modification under state law.
Not every adjustment requires a petition; some trusts allow amendment by the settlor or require consent from beneficiaries. Where those options are unavailable or contested, a petition may be necessary to protect the trust’s integrity. The petition should present a persuasive factual and legal basis for modification, including evidence of changed circumstances or drafting errors. The court also considers the interests of all beneficiaries and whether the proposed change aligns with the original trust purpose, balancing respect for the settlor’s intent with current realities facing trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition typically includes a clear statement of the existing trust terms, the specific changes being requested, and the legal grounds supporting the modification. The petition must identify interested parties, explain why the change is necessary or appropriate, and attach relevant documents such as the trust instrument and any amendments. Supporting declarations from the settlor, trustees, or other witnesses often accompany the filing to provide factual context. The court may hold a hearing and will issue an order granting or denying the requested modification based on evidence and legal standards.
Preparing a petition requires gathering the trust document and related records, drafting a proposed order that reflects the desired changes, and preparing declarations that explain the factual basis for modification. Notices to beneficiaries and potentially interested parties are often necessary, and the process may include mediation or informal negotiations to reduce disputes. If objections arise, the court will consider the arguments and evidence presented by all sides. A well-prepared petition reduces the risk of delays and increases the chance the court will approve modifications that align with legal standards and the settlor’s intent.
Understanding the terms commonly used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and communicate effectively with the court and other parties. This glossary highlights terms you are likely to encounter such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, probate avoidance, amendment, reformation, and modification. Knowing these definitions clarifies the roles and potential outcomes and prepares clients for the documents and discussions that will arise during a petition. If a term remains unclear, we will explain it in plain language so you can make informed decisions.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor or trustor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s original intent and instructions are central to any request to modify the trust. Courts give substantial weight to the settlor’s expressed purposes, and when changes are proposed, the court evaluates whether the modification aligns with or corrects deviations from that original intent. Understanding the settlor’s role helps beneficiaries and trustees assess whether a modification petition is appropriate and how it should be framed.
Reformation and modification are terms that describe court-ordered changes to a trust, but they may be used in different legal contexts. Reformation commonly addresses situations where the written trust does not reflect the settlor’s actual intent due to mistake or ambiguity, while modification may adjust the trust legally to reflect changed circumstances. Both processes typically require a petition, supporting evidence, and court approval, and both seek to align the trust documents with the settlor’s intent or current needs of beneficiaries and trustees.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties, including duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and must follow the trust instrument as written unless a court authorizes a modification. When a petition seeks to replace or direct a trustee, the court considers whether the change serves the trust’s purpose and protects beneficiaries’ interests, balancing the trustee’s actions against the obligations defined by state trust law.
Beneficiaries are persons or entities entitled to receive benefits from a trust, and they have legal rights that must be respected during modification proceedings. Courts typically require notice to all affected beneficiaries so they can consent to or object to proposed changes. Beneficiary involvement ensures transparency and protects against unauthorized alterations that could harm inheritance expectations. Notices and the opportunity to be heard help the court evaluate whether the petition respects each beneficiary’s legal rights under state law and the trust document.
When changes are needed, trusts may sometimes be amended directly by the settlor if the trust allows it and the settlor is able and willing to act. Reformation is an option when the written trust contains errors that do not reflect the settlor’s intent. A trust modification petition provides a court-based mechanism when amendment is not possible or when parties disagree. Each route has procedural differences, evidentiary requirements, and timelines. Choosing the right path depends on document language, settlor capacity, beneficiary positions, and the nature of the requested change.
When trust language needs only minor clarification and all interested parties agree, a consent-based amendment or a clarifying memorandum may resolve the issue without court involvement. This approach can be faster and less costly because it avoids litigation and formal hearings. Documents that explicitly allow the settlor to amend during their lifetime are often simpler to adjust. However, any informal agreement should be carefully documented to avoid future disputes and to ensure trustees and financial institutions accept the change.
Some updates, such as changing contact information for trustees, updating bank account details, or replacing an agent due to relocation, may be managed administratively without a petition when the trust instrument permits such actions. These changes generally do not affect beneficiary entitlements or the core operation of the trust. Handling minor administrative matters informally can preserve resources and maintain trust continuity, provided all parties understand and document the updates to avoid confusion with future asset management or beneficiary communications.
When beneficiaries disagree, when trust language is ambiguous, or when important changes affect distributions, a comprehensive legal approach that includes filing a petition may be necessary to obtain an authoritative court decision. Courts can issue orders that resolve disputes, clarify intent, or correct defects in trust documents. Pursuing a petition under these circumstances reduces the risk of ongoing uncertainty and conflicting claims and provides a clear legal basis for trustees to manage assets in compliance with the court’s direction.
When modifications involve complex financial arrangements, tax planning, or multiple asset classes, a comprehensive approach ensures that proposed changes are legally sound and coordinated with other planning tools. Court-approved modifications can address questions about tax consequences, retirement account designations, or irrevocable trust terms in a manner that administrative updates cannot. A careful, comprehensive petition anticipates downstream implications and seeks a resolution that protects the trust’s purpose and the beneficiaries’ long-term interests.
Pursuing a court-approved modification brings the benefit of clarity and finality, reducing the risk of future disputes and providing trustees with an enforceable order to follow. The process creates a record explaining why changes were needed and how they align with the settlor’s intent or current circumstances. For families experiencing change, a clear legal resolution can help maintain relationships and ensure assets are managed and distributed as intended. Court orders also help financial institutions accept updated instructions without delay.
A comprehensive approach also helps preserve the trust’s integrity by ensuring that all interested parties receive notice and an opportunity to be heard, which supports transparency and fairness. When tax implications or creditor issues are present, a formal petition allows the court to consider these broader consequences and weigh them against the requested changes. This level of legal oversight can reduce future litigation risk and provide beneficiaries with confidence that the trust’s administration is being conducted under the court’s supervision.
A court-issued order granting a trust modification provides a definitive legal basis for trustees and beneficiaries to follow, removing ambiguity about the trust’s terms going forward. This greater certainty helps trustees make asset management decisions, allows beneficiaries to understand their rights, and reduces the potential for future disagreements. The enforceable nature of court orders also encourages compliance by all parties and makes it easier to resolve any post-modification disputes efficiently through established court procedures.
Pursuing modification with court involvement protects beneficiary interests by ensuring notice and an opportunity to respond, and by creating a formal record that documents the reasons for the change. Clear documentation helps trustees and financial institutions accept the updated terms and reduces the chance of misinterpretation. When families face complex situations, a documented court order reduces ambiguity and supports consistent administration of the trust according to the newly established terms.
Begin by collecting all trust-related records including the original trust instrument, amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, certificates of trust, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Include associated documents like financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and HIPAA authorizations where relevant. Organizing these materials early streamlines drafting the petition, supports factual declarations, and helps identify whether minor corrections or a full petition is needed. Well-organized documentation also facilitates communication with beneficiaries and the court.
Trust modification petitions require procedural steps like notice, service, and potentially hearings, so plan for timelines that allow responses and potential court scheduling. Complex factual disputes or contested issues can lengthen the process, and the need for additional documentation or expert testimony may arise. Starting early and preparing comprehensive filings reduces the likelihood of repeated continuances. Being realistic about timing helps clients make interim arrangements for asset management and maintain stability while the petition proceeds.
Consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains ambiguous provisions, drafting errors, or if changed circumstances mean the original terms no longer serve their intended purpose. Examples include missing trustee instructions, distribution language that does not reflect current family relationships, or provisions that interfere with effective estate or tax planning. A petition allows the court to evaluate the reasons for change and issue an order that clarifies trust administration, protecting beneficiaries and guiding trustees on how to proceed under the revised terms.
Also consider a petition when parties cannot reach agreement privately or when the settlor is no longer able to amend the trust directly. If a trustee needs direction to carry out complex financial decisions or if there are concerns about capacity or undue influence, the court can address those issues in a modification proceeding. Seeking judicial resolution preserves the legal record and provides a confident basis for trustees to manage assets, while offering beneficiaries the opportunity to voice concerns and be heard under court supervision.
Common circumstances that lead clients to seek a petition include changes in family composition such as births, deaths, or divorce, relocation of trustees or beneficiaries, newly discovered drafting mistakes, and evolving tax or asset protection considerations. Other triggers include disputes among beneficiaries, concerns about trustee performance, or the need to align trust terms with contemporaneous planning instruments like wills and powers of attorney. Identifying the specific facts helps determine whether a petition is appropriate and how best to frame the requested relief.
Ambiguities in trust language can create uncertainty about how trustees should interpret and implement the settlor’s intentions. Conflicting provisions or unclear distribution instructions often require a court to interpret the document or correct drafting mistakes through reformation or modification. Filing a petition in such situations provides a definitive resolution that clarifies administration and reduces the chance of ongoing disputes. The petition should present evidence of the settlor’s intent and explain why the proposed change resolves the ambiguity while honoring the trust’s purpose.
Significant life events like the birth of grandchildren, divorce, remarriage, death of a beneficiary, or substantial changes in asset values can justify modifying a trust to reflect new priorities. Similarly, new tax considerations or retirement account issues may require adjustments to trust provisions. A petition can adapt the trust to protect beneficiaries’ interests and preserve the settlor’s goals despite changed circumstances. The court reviews evidence of the need for change and how the modification will affect all interested parties.
When a trustee is unable or unwilling to act, when there are allegations of misconduct, or when trustees need legal direction for complex decisions, a modification petition can address trustee replacement or clarify administrative powers. Courts can also authorize actions that trustees hesitate to take without judicial approval. Seeking court guidance in these situations protects beneficiaries and ensures trustees have a lawful framework for decision-making, especially when trust assets require careful handling or when disputes threaten efficient administration.
We provide local legal services tailored to residents of Rancho Palos Verdes and surrounding communities, offering careful attention to trust modification matters. Whether your issue relates to a revocable living trust, irrevocable trust, pour-over will, or other estate planning documents such as a certification of trust or special needs trust, we focus on practical solutions that reflect California law. Our goal is to guide clients through every step of the petition process, from document review to court filings and hearings, while keeping communication clear and responsive.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman have a deep practice in estate planning and trust matters, including petitions to modify trusts. We emphasize personalized attention and careful preparation of petitions and supporting declarations so courts have a clear record to evaluate. Our firm helps clients understand the legal standards involved and develops strategies that aim to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and trustees’ ability to administer assets in accordance with the court’s order.
Clients receive practical guidance through each phase of the process, including document collection, drafting proposed orders, providing notices to interested parties, and representing clients at hearings if necessary. We work to anticipate issues that may arise during the petition and prepare the factual record accordingly, helping clients make informed decisions at every step. Clear communication with clients, trustees, and beneficiaries is a central part of our approach, and we strive to reduce stress and avoid unnecessary delays whenever possible.
The firm’s services extend to coordination with other estate planning tools such as wills, powers of attorney, HIPAA authorizations, and various trust types including irrevocable life insurance trusts and special needs trusts. When tax or retirement plan matters intersect with modification needs, we coordinate with financial and tax advisors to ensure proposed changes align with broader planning objectives. Our priority is practical, legally sound outcomes that serve the long-term interests of clients and their families.
Our process begins with a thorough document review and an initial consultation to identify the desired changes and likely legal pathway. We gather relevant documents including the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and financial records. After reviewing the facts, we prepare a draft petition, supporting declarations, and a proposed order for the court. We then serve notices to beneficiaries and interested parties, respond to any opposition, and present the case at hearings as needed, always keeping clients informed of developments and next steps.
The first step is to assess the situation and collect all relevant trust and estate planning documents. This includes the trust itself, amendments, certificates of trust, related wills, powers of attorney, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Gathering this material early helps identify whether a petition is necessary or whether a less formal remedy will suffice. The assessment also considers beneficiary positions, potential objections, and timing concerns so the petition can be tailored to the case’s specifics.
During the initial consultation we review the facts, explain possible legal options, and discuss the likely procedural steps and timelines. We outline possible outcomes and consider whether negotiation with beneficiaries can resolve the matter without court action. If a petition is advisable, we explain the evidence needed to support the filing and identify documents and witnesses that will strengthen the case. Clients receive clear information about costs, potential responses from interested parties, and what to expect at each stage of the process.
After agreeing to proceed, we collect and analyze all relevant records, prepare declarations, and identify factual support for the requested modification. This may include obtaining financial statements, correspondence, and testimony that explain the settlor’s intent or demonstrate changed circumstances. Meticulous document preparation helps shorten hearings and reduces surprises from opposing parties. Creating a clear, organized record for the court is key to obtaining an order that accurately reflects the proposed changes and withstands potential challenges.
The second step involves drafting a clear petition that sets out the existing trust provisions, identifies the desired changes, and explains the legal and factual basis for modification. We prepare a proposed order for the court and assemble supporting declarations and exhibits. Notices are drafted and served on beneficiaries and other interested parties in compliance with California procedure. Filing the petition begins the formal process and triggers response deadlines so all parties have an opportunity to participate in resolving the matter.
Drafting focuses on precision and clarity, including articulating exactly what language should be modified and why the change satisfies legal standards. A proposed order accompanies the petition so the judge can easily see the requested relief. Clear drafting reduces ambiguity and helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently. Including detailed declarations and exhibits that explain the underlying facts makes the petition more persuasive and can limit the need for extensive discovery or additional hearings.
Once the petition is filed, proper service and notice requirements must be met so beneficiaries and interested parties can respond. We manage the logistics of serving documents, address any procedural objections, and respond to petitions or motions filed by others. Early engagement with opposing parties can sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions, while formal responses may require additional filings. Maintaining organized records of service and responses is important for demonstrating compliance with court rules and preserving the integrity of the proceeding.
After filing and response periods, the court may set a hearing to consider the petition and any opposition. At the hearing, the court reviews declarations, evidence, and arguments from all sides before issuing an order. If the petition is granted, the court’s order will specify the changes and provide guidance for implementation. We assist clients with obtaining certified copies of the order, notifying financial institutions, and updating trust administration documents so trustees can carry out the revised terms in compliance with the court’s instructions.
Preparation for a hearing includes organizing exhibits, coordinating witness testimony, and rehearsing key points so the court clearly understands the factual and legal basis for the requested modification. We present the petition’s rationale, respond to opposing arguments, and highlight evidence that supports the change. Effective hearing preparation often shortens court time and clarifies issues for the judge, increasing the likelihood of a prompt, well-reasoned order that addresses the parties’ concerns and provides specific directions for trust administration.
Once the court issues an order, we help implement the changes by preparing updated trust records, providing the trustee with instructions on carrying out the order, and assisting with notifications to financial institutions and other entities holding trust assets. Where necessary, we assist with filings such as certification of trust or revised beneficiary communications. Clear implementation ensures the trust operates under the new terms and reduces the risk of confusion or noncompliance by third parties responsible for holding or disbursing trust property.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting changes to an existing trust when private amendment is unavailable or when parties dispute proposed changes. The petition outlines the current trust provisions, the specific modifications sought, and the legal and factual reasons supporting the request. Courts review petitions to ensure changes align with the settlor’s intent or address legitimate issues such as drafting errors, changed circumstances, or trustee-related concerns. Filing provides a court-authorized pathway to adjust trust terms while preserving beneficiaries’ rights and creating an enforceable record. A petition may be needed when the settlor cannot amend the trust directly, when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, or when a trustee seeks judicial guidance for complex administration decisions. The court process involves serving notice to interested parties, allowing responses, and potentially holding a hearing. Petition outcomes can include orders that clarify trust language, authorize trustee actions, replace trustees, or reform the document to reflect the settlor’s actual intent. The goal is a legally sound resolution that supports proper trust administration.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, whether parties contest the changes, and the court’s schedule. In straightforward, uncontested matters the process can be completed in a matter of weeks to a few months if all notices and documents are in order and beneficiaries consent. More complex or contested petitions often extend over several months and sometimes longer, particularly when discovery, multiple hearings, or additional evidence is required. Court calendars and local procedural timelines also influence how quickly matters progress. Proactive preparation and clear, well-documented filings can shorten the process by reducing the need for repeated continuances or supplemental evidence. Early communication with beneficiaries and trustees may also streamline resolution. If an urgent matter arises, such as an immediate administrative need, the petition can request expedited consideration, although the court will evaluate urgency in light of all parties’ rights. Working with counsel to anticipate potential objections helps keep the timeline as efficient as possible.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties are normally required to receive notice of a trust modification petition. California procedures typically mandate that all persons with a legal or equitable interest in the trust receive sufficient notice so they can review the petition and participate in the proceedings if they choose. Proper notice ensures transparency and gives beneficiaries the opportunity to consent, object, or otherwise protect their interests. Failure to provide adequate notice can result in procedural challenges or delay the court’s ability to issue a final order. The notice process also allows beneficiaries to evaluate the petition’s merits and to seek counsel if they have concerns. Where practical, engaging beneficiaries in early discussions can sometimes avoid formal objections and lead to agreed solutions. When objections do arise, the court will consider the positions of all notified parties before making a determination, ensuring that the rights of beneficiaries are respected throughout the modification process.
Yes, a trustee can be replaced or a trustee’s powers modified through a trust modification petition if the court finds adequate grounds and determines the requested change is consistent with the trust’s purpose. Grounds for removing a trustee may include incapacity, conflict of interest, inability to perform duties, or misconduct. A petition requesting replacement should present evidence supporting the change and propose a qualified successor or mechanism for appointing one, while explaining how the change protects beneficiaries’ interests and facilitates proper administration of the trust. Courts evaluate trustee-related petitions carefully to balance the need for continuity in asset management with protecting beneficiaries from harm. The court may also limit or clarify trustee powers rather than remove a trustee outright, depending on the circumstances. Proposed orders should clearly define the scope of new duties or limitations so trustees and financial institutions have clear guidance for ongoing administration.
Courts typically require clear factual evidence supporting a requested modification, such as the settlor’s intent, documentation of changed circumstances, or proof of drafting mistakes. Supporting materials often include copies of the trust instrument and any amendments, declarations from witnesses or parties familiar with the settlor’s intent, financial records showing changed circumstances, and any correspondence or documents that clarify ambiguous provisions. A well-developed factual record helps the court understand why the requested modification is necessary and how it aligns with the trust’s purpose. In some cases, expert testimony or formal discovery may be required to resolve factual disputes, but many petitions succeed with thorough documentary evidence and persuasive declarations. The petition should anticipate likely objections and address them with clear factual support. Courts weigh the evidence presented and consider whether the change preserves the settlor’s intent and serves the beneficiaries’ interests before granting an order.
A trust amendment is typically a change made according to the trust instrument’s provisions, often by the settlor if the trust is revocable and the settlor has capacity to act. Reformation is a court-ordered correction that addresses mistakes or ambiguities to reflect the settlor’s actual intent. A trust modification petition is a broader court process that seeks to alter the trust for reasons such as changed circumstances, administration needs, or when private amendment is not possible. Each approach has distinct procedural requirements and evidentiary standards, and choosing the best route depends on the document language and circumstances. Amendments are generally less formal when the settlor can act, while reformation and modification involve court oversight and notice to beneficiaries. Reformation focuses on correcting what the settlor intended but mistakenly failed to reflect in writing, whereas modification can adapt the trust to new circumstances. When parties disagree or when the settlor cannot amend, a petition is often the appropriate mechanism to obtain court authorization for changes.
Yes, certain changes to a trust can have tax implications for beneficiaries or the trust itself, particularly when modifications alter distribution timing, income allocations, or the character of assets held by the trust. If changes affect estate, gift, or generation-skipping transfer tax consequences, consulting tax or financial advisors alongside legal counsel is advisable. The court may consider tax consequences when evaluating a petition, and well-coordinated planning helps avoid unintended tax burdens that could undermine the benefits of a proposed modification. When retirement accounts, insurance trusts, or irrevocable trusts are involved, documentation and careful drafting become even more important to ensure changes do not create adverse tax results. Coordinating with qualified tax professionals ensures that modifications align with broader financial planning goals and that the petition addresses potential tax concerns in a way the court can consider.
If a beneficiary objects to a proposed modification, the objection becomes part of the court record and the court will consider opposing arguments and evidence before issuing a decision. Objections may raise issues such as lack of notice, insufficient evidence of changed circumstances, or claims that the modification conflicts with the settlor’s intent. When objections arise, counsel for both sides may file briefs, declarations, and exhibits to support their positions, and the court may hold a hearing to evaluate the competing claims and issue an appropriate ruling. Objections can lengthen the process and increase costs, so early communication and attempt at resolution are often beneficial. Where disputes cannot be resolved, the court’s role is to weigh the evidence and legal standards, issue a reasoned decision, and, if necessary, provide instructions for implementation that protect beneficiaries’ rights while honoring the trust’s purpose.
Courts sometimes encourage or require parties to attempt mediation or settlement efforts before proceeding to contested hearings, especially where disputes involve family relationships or complex factual issues. Mediation can provide a less adversarial setting for reaching an agreement that preserves relationships and reduces cost and time. If mediation succeeds, the parties can present a joint petition or a stipulation to the court for approval, often avoiding a lengthy contested hearing and fostering cooperative administration of the trust after modification. If mediation fails or is not appropriate, the court will proceed to consider the petition and any objections under normal adjudicative procedures. Attempting settlement early demonstrates good faith and may reflect favorably in the court’s consideration of both procedural matters and requests for relief, while allowing parties to retain control over outcome rather than leaving decisions solely to a judge.
Before filing a petition, gather all relevant documentation and organize it clearly for review. This includes the trust instrument and any amendments, related estate planning documents like pour-over wills and powers of attorney, financial statements, correspondence that clarifies intent, and records showing changed circumstances. Identifying interested parties and their contact information, and preserving any evidence supporting the requested modification, strengthens the petition and shortens the time needed to respond to court inquiries or opposing parties. Consider opening lines of communication with beneficiaries and trustees to explore whether an agreement is possible before formal filing. Preparing thorough, well-supported declarations and exhibits and being ready to explain the factual basis for change helps the court assess the petition efficiently. Early coordination with financial or tax advisors can also identify issues that should be addressed in the petition to ensure a comprehensive approach.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas