A Heggstad petition can be an effective legal step when property intended to be part of a trust was never formally transferred into that trust. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition works in California and what clients in Rolling Hills should expect. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical guidance on preparing and filing the petition, gathering supporting documentation, and presenting evidence to the court that asset transfer to the trust was intended. Understanding the petition process and the typical timeline helps families preserve trust plans and avoid unintended probate for assets that should be governed by the trust.
Many families discover that important assets were never formally re-titled in the name of their trust despite clear intentions to do so. When this happens, a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize the trust as the true owner of the asset. This step prevents assets from becoming subject to probate and aligns administration with the trust maker’s documented plan. Our team helps clients collect deeds, declarations, affidavits, and other evidence that show the decedent intended to place assets into the trust. Clear documentation increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
A Heggstad petition supports the goals of a living trust by asking the court to acknowledge that specific property was always intended to be trust property. The primary benefit is avoiding probate for assets that should have passed under the trust’s terms, which saves time and reduces court involvement. Filing a petition can also reduce disputes among beneficiaries by providing a formal legal ruling on ownership. Additionally, resolving title issues assures trustees can manage and distribute trust assets without delay. Timely action and coherent documentation are important to protect beneficiaries’ interests and honor the trust maker’s wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across California with trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document review, and thoughtful preparation of the petition and supporting affidavits. We work closely with family members and trustees to locate deeds, declarations of trust, and other evidence that demonstrate intent to transfer assets. Our goal is to present a concise, persuasive case to the probate court so trust property is recognized without unnecessary delay. Clients receive regular updates and practical guidance on next steps throughout the process.
A Heggstad petition asks a California probate court to recognize that property should be treated as trust property despite failures to complete formal transfer paperwork. This legal remedy derives from case law that permits courts to correct title when the trust maker clearly intended the asset to be part of the trust. Petition preparation requires assembling deeds, trust documents, correspondence, and witness statements that show intent and actions taken to transfer property. For trustees and beneficiaries, understanding the petition grounds and evidentiary needs is essential to resolving title questions and ensuring proper trust administration.
The petition filing typically involves identifying the asset, providing copies of trust instruments, and presenting evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be governed by the trust. Courts evaluate whether the trust maker’s intent was clear and whether equitable considerations support recognition of the trust’s ownership. The process may include a court hearing where trustees or interested persons present affidavits or testimony. While outcomes depend on the facts and proof, a well-prepared petition often persuades the court to confirm trust ownership and avoid probate proceedings for the disputed item.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that an asset belongs to a trust rather than passing through probate. The petition usually cites documents such as the trust instrument and any written or oral statements that show the decedent intended to retitle the asset in the trust’s name. The court’s role is to examine the totality of the evidence and determine whether equity requires recognizing the trust’s ownership. This remedy is most appropriate where there is strong proof of intent but a gap in the formal transfer process, helping preserve the trust maker’s estate plan and reduce unnecessary administration.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves gathering core documents, drafting clear factual statements, and identifying interested parties who must be notified. Typical evidence includes the trust document, copies of deeds or account statements, correspondence indicating intent to fund the trust, and declarations from witnesses or trustees. The petition explains the factual basis for the court declaration and requests that the property be recognized as trust property. Depending on the case, the process may include informal negotiation with family members, a filed petition and notice, a response period, and, if necessary, a hearing to obtain a court order confirming ownership.
Understanding common legal terms helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow the Heggstad petition process. Terms like trustee, settlor, deed, grantor, probate, and declaration of trust appear frequently in petitions and supporting documents. Clarifying these definitions can reduce confusion and make it easier to gather the right evidence. This section defines important vocabulary used during petition preparation and court proceedings so clients know what documents to locate and how different roles affect the outcome of a petition seeking recognition of trust ownership over specific assets.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person known as the trust maker places assets under the control of a trustee to be managed and distributed for beneficiaries according to the trust document. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable and are commonly used to avoid probate, provide privacy, and plan for incapacity. For Heggstad petitions, the trust document is central evidence showing the decedent’s intent to have assets governed by the trust. The trust instrument typically identifies the trustee, beneficiaries, and instructions for asset management and distribution.
Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing a decedent’s assets when there is no valid trust or when assets were not transferred into an existing trust. Probate can be time-consuming, public, and more costly than trust administration. A successful Heggstad petition can prevent assets from entering probate by establishing that those assets were intended to be trust property. That outcome preserves privacy and often shortens the timeline for distribution. Individuals considering a petition should weigh the evidence required to demonstrate trust ownership against the cost of initiating court proceedings.
A deed is a legal document used to transfer title to real property. In trust planning, deeds are commonly used to transfer property into the name of a trust. When a deed was not prepared or recorded, a Heggstad petition may be used to show that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust despite the lack of formal transfer. Supporting documents such as drafts, correspondence, or witness declarations can help establish that intent when the recorded deed is missing or flawed, enabling the court to recognize the trust’s ownership.
A declaration or affidavit is a written statement made under penalty of perjury that provides facts relevant to the petition. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals can describe the decedent’s actions and statements indicating intent to transfer assets to the trust. Such statements can provide persuasive evidence in support of a Heggstad petition by documenting conversations, instructions, or steps taken toward funding the trust. Properly drafted declarations explain the basis for the petition and assist the court in assessing ownership questions.
When an asset was not formally transferred to a trust, there are different approaches to resolve the ownership issue. Options include informal settlement agreements among heirs, initiating probate, pursuing a Heggstad petition, or seeking corrective documents such as a corrective deed if possible. A Heggstad petition is particularly appropriate where the decedent’s intent is clear but formal transfer is incomplete. Each option has tradeoffs in terms of cost, time, and likelihood of resolving title. Evaluating family dynamics, available evidence, and the value of the asset helps determine the most appropriate path forward.
When the asset in question is low in value and all interested parties agree on distribution, an informal resolution may avoid court proceedings. For example, beneficiaries might sign a written agreement acknowledging how the asset should be treated, and trustee actions can proceed with mutual consent. This approach reduces legal fees and speedily resolves ownership questions. However, informal agreements should be documented carefully to prevent future disputes, and parties should consider whether a formal court order may be necessary to provide lasting protection and certainty for the trust administration.
If parties can obtain corrective documentation such as a corrective or reformation deed signed by appropriate parties, corrective measures may avoid filing a petition. Securing properly executed and recorded documents that reflect the trust maker’s original intent can remedy title defects without court intervention. This solution typically requires cooperation from those with legal authority to sign and clear evidence explaining the mistake. When corrective documents are feasible, the process is often faster and less costly than petitioning the court, though it depends on the availability of the necessary signatories and proof.
When multiple parties claim an interest in the asset or title records are unclear, a comprehensive legal approach that includes filing a Heggstad petition may be required. Complex facts, inconsistent documentation, or competing beneficiary assertions make informal resolution unlikely to produce a durable outcome. A formal petition creates a court record and final determination that clarifies ownership, enabling trustees to administer and distribute assets with legal certainty. Preparing a persuasive petition in such circumstances often involves thorough research, document collection, and clear presentation of the factual record to the court.
For significant assets, taking a comprehensive approach protects beneficiary interests and reduces the risk of future litigation. High-value property that lacks clear title documentation may jeopardize the trust distribution plan and create costly disputes if left unresolved. A Heggstad petition seeks a definitive court judgment that recognizes the trust’s interest, eliminating ambiguity and enabling trustees to manage or transfer the asset. In these situations, careful legal planning, documentation, and court filings can preserve estate value and ensure the decedent’s intentions are followed.
A comprehensive legal approach to a Heggstad petition helps ensure key evidence is collected, deadlines are met, and required notices are properly served. This thorough preparation reduces the chance of procedural defects that could delay a court ruling. By documenting intent through recorded deeds, declarations, and other records, the petition becomes stronger and more persuasive. Comprehensive preparation also addresses potential objections proactively and clarifies the interests of all parties, which often leads to quicker resolution and less post-judgment conflict among beneficiaries and trustees.
Comprehensive handling of a Heggstad petition tends to reduce long-term costs and risks by producing a durable court order recognizing trust ownership. That formal recognition streamlines subsequent trust administration and distribution, avoids uncertainties that could trigger probate, and helps trustees act with confidence. When the petition is supported by a well-documented factual record and clear legal argument, courts are more likely to issue an order that resolves title issues definitively. This outcome protects the estate’s value and helps families move forward with the trust maker’s intended plan.
A comprehensive petition creates a robust factual record that the court can rely on when deciding whether to recognize trust ownership. Detailed documentation, clear affidavits, and consistent evidence of intent reduce the likelihood that heirs will challenge the outcome later. This thorough record benefits trustees by providing legal backing for their management decisions and reduces the chance of costly litigation after the petition is decided. In short, building a stronger evidentiary foundation at the outset helps secure a stable, lasting resolution for the trust and its beneficiaries.
When a Heggstad petition is backed by careful preparation, courts can more readily confirm trust ownership and allow trustees to proceed with distribution. That clarity shortens the administrative timeline and reduces the practical burdens on trustees and families. Rather than leaving assets in limbo or subject to probate, a successful petition helps ensure assets are handled according to the trust’s terms. The resulting administrative certainty benefits beneficiaries who rely on timely distributions and trustees who need clear authority to manage trust property responsibly and transparently.
Gathering all relevant documents early accelerates the petition process and strengthens your case. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, correspondence that references funding the trust, and any draft documents or prior recorded instruments. Written declarations from family members or trustees who recall the trust maker’s intentions can be very helpful, as can records of attempted transfers or drafts of deeds. Organizing these materials chronologically and providing clear explanations of each item will make it easier to assemble a persuasive petition and reduce delays caused by incomplete documentation.
Courts focus on the trust maker’s intent when ruling on a Heggstad petition, so prepare to explain actions that demonstrate that intent. This can include statements the trust maker made about placing assets into the trust, records of attempted transfers, and any evidence showing that the trustee managed the asset with trust administration in mind. Clear affidavits from witnesses who recall relevant conversations or instructions may be persuasive. Responding to potential objections in advance and framing the narrative around the trust maker’s consistent conduct will strengthen the petition’s likelihood of success.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an important asset intended for a trust was never formally transferred and there is meaningful documentary or testimonial evidence of intent. If leaving the asset subject to probate would defeat the trust maker’s plan, if beneficiary interests are at stake, or if title problems prevent trustees from managing or disposing of the property, a petition can create a legal record confirming trust ownership. Seeking a court declaration is especially relevant when informal agreements won’t provide lasting protection or when multiple parties dispute the asset’s rightful ownership.
A petition may also be advisable when real property or other high-value assets lack clear title documentation because the potential costs and delays of probate could substantially reduce the estate’s value. By asking the court to recognize the trust’s interest, trustees can avoid the administrative and financial burdens that accompany probate litigation in some cases. Parties should weigh the strength of available evidence, the likelihood of opposition, and the value of obtaining a definitive judicial ruling that preserves the trust maker’s intended distribution plan.
Typical circumstances include a deed that was never recorded or signed before the trust maker’s death, bank or investment accounts that remained in the decedent’s name despite intentions to fund the trust, and assets bought or titled in ways that overlooked the trust. Family members moving quickly after a death may discover gaps between the trust document and recorded titles. When missing transfers threaten to derail a trust-based distribution plan, a Heggstad petition offers a way to align legal title with the trust maker’s documented intentions and prevent those assets from entering probate.
One frequent scenario is real property that was meant to be transferred via a deed but remains in the decedent’s individual name. This oversight can result from delays in signing or recording deeds, uncertainty about tax implications, or misunderstandings about the trust funding process. When real estate is involved, resolving ownership is important because property often comprises a large portion of an estate’s value. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the property was trust property despite the absence of a recorded deed, based on the available evidence of intent.
Bank or investment accounts sometimes remain titled in the decedent’s name due to missed beneficiary designation updates or administrative oversight. These assets can be brought into the trust through a petition when the trust maker’s intent to fund the trust is documented. Collecting statements, correspondence with financial institutions, and testimony about the trust maker’s instructions can support the petition. Recognizing those accounts as trust property prevents them from passing through probate and aligns administration with the trust’s distribution provisions.
Personal property, vehicles, or unique assets like collectibles may lack formal title or have ambiguous ownership records, especially if transfers were informal. When the trust instrument indicates that such items were intended to be trust property, a petition can help establish ownership for administration and distribution. Evidence can include contemporaneous notes, lists of assets, photographic records, and witness statements. Establishing title through a court declaration helps trustees inventory, manage, and distribute these items in accordance with the trust maker’s directions.
Although based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman advises clients across California on trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions for property in Los Angeles County communities like Rolling Hills. We coordinate document collection, evaluate the strength of evidentiary materials, prepare the petition, and guide clients through court filing and hearing procedures. For local matters we consult closely with trustees and heirs to develop a clear presentation of intent and necessary documentation. Our priority is to help clients secure a court determination that aligns legal title with the trust maker’s documented plan.
Choosing representation means you have a legal team that focuses on trust administration and understands what courts look for when deciding a Heggstad petition. We help clients assemble the factual record, prepare persuasive declarations, and navigate procedural requirements. Our practice emphasizes timely communication, careful review of title records, and practical strategies that prioritize reducing delays and resolving disputes. Clients appreciate straightforward guidance about evidence collection, notice requirements, and likely timelines so they can make informed decisions throughout the process.
We assist trustees and family members in assembling deeds, trust instruments, and corroborating statements needed to support a petition. This includes coordinating with title companies, financial institutions, and witnesses to retrieve documentation and prepare declarations. We explain options for resolving title defects and recommend petition strategies tailored to the facts, whether informal settlement is possible or court action is needed. Our goal is to achieve a durable resolution that protects beneficiaries and preserves the trust maker’s plan while keeping clients informed and involved.
Clients often value having clear steps to follow when an asset intended for a trust was overlooked. We offer guidance on whether corrective documentation or a court petition is the best path, and we work to minimize unnecessary expense and delay. Throughout the process we focus on practical outcomes: obtaining orders that let trustees manage or transfer property, reducing the risk of future litigation, and ensuring distributions proceed according to the trust’s terms. Our representation supports efficient, well-documented resolutions for trust funding gaps.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust, related documents, and the asset at issue. We then identify necessary evidence, prepare declarations, and collect supporting records such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence. After drafting the petition and required notices, we file with the probate court and serve interested parties according to the rules. If a hearing is necessary, we prepare exhibits and sworn testimony to present the factual case. Throughout the matter we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed and coordinate any settlement communications to reduce the need for contested proceedings.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust instrument and any documentation related to the asset. We help clients locate deeds, correspondence, account records, and any written drafts or notes reflecting the trust maker’s intent. This stage includes interviewing potential witnesses who can provide declarations supporting the petition. By compiling a clear factual narrative and organized evidence file, we set the foundation for a persuasive petition and avoid common procedural errors that could delay a court ruling.
Collecting the trust document and title records is essential to show the relationship between the asset and the trust maker’s plan. We work with clients to obtain recorded deeds, mortgage records, and account ownership statements that illustrate ownership history. If records are incomplete, we assist in obtaining copies from county recorder offices or financial institutions. Clear presentation of these records helps the court understand why the asset should be recognized as trust property and supports a streamlined petition filing.
Witness statements and declarations explaining the trust maker’s intent can be critical evidence. We identify individuals who witnessed discussions, saw draft documents, or participated in steps to fund the trust and prepare clear, properly formatted declarations for court submission. These statements should describe specific observations and the basis for the witness’s knowledge. Affidavits are prepared carefully to avoid hearsay issues and to present a factual, credible narrative that complements documentary evidence in support of the petition.
Once evidence is collected, we draft a petition that explains the factual background, cites applicable legal authority, and requests a court declaration recognizing the trust’s ownership of the asset. The filing includes supporting exhibits such as the trust document, deeds, account statements, and declarations from witnesses. We also prepare and file required notices to interested parties and ensure procedural requirements are satisfied. Accurate pleading and proper service reduce the risk of procedural challenges that could delay resolution.
Supporting exhibits and a clear statement of facts are the backbone of a Heggstad petition. We organize exhibits to tell a chronological story showing the trust maker’s intent, attach declarations that explain actions taken, and frame legal arguments that guide the court’s analysis. Presenting a logically ordered file with clear references to exhibits helps judges understand the factual basis and reach a decision that aligns title with the trust maker’s plan. Proper attention to detail at this stage enhances the petition’s persuasiveness.
After the petition and exhibits are prepared, we file with the appropriate probate court and serve interested parties as required by the rules. Service documentation is important to show that all potentially affected persons received notice and had an opportunity to respond. Timely and proper service prevents procedural objections and establishes a clear timeline for responses. If opposition arises, early notice also provides opportunities for settlement discussions prior to a contested hearing.
If required, a court hearing provides the forum for presenting testimony and evidence supporting the petition. We prepare exhibits, review witness testimony, and outline the factual narrative to be communicated to the judge. Our goal is to present a concise, well-documented case that demonstrates the trust maker’s intent and justifies a court declaration of trust ownership. Once the judge issues an order, we ensure the order is recorded or otherwise implemented so the asset is administered and distributed according to the trust terms.
During a hearing we present documentary evidence and witness declarations that explain the trust maker’s actions and intent. We anticipate potential objections and prepare responses that emphasize the weight of the factual record and equitable considerations. Clear presentation helps the court distinguish strong proof of intent from mere assertions. When objections arise, addressing them directly with supporting documents and witness statements often leads the court to a reasoned conclusion that recognizes trust ownership when the evidence supports that outcome.
After a favorable ruling, the court’s order can be used to update title records or satisfy institutions that require confirmation of ownership. We assist in recording orders with county recorder offices, notifying financial institutions, and taking steps to reflect the court’s determination in asset records. Implementing the order ensures trustees have the clear authority needed to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust. This final administrative phase ensures the legal outcome is translated into practical control over the property.
A Heggstad petition is a court request in California asking the probate court to recognize that specific property belongs to a trust even though formal title transfer paperwork was not completed. It is used when the trust instrument and supporting evidence show the decedent intended the asset to be trust property, but the deed or title was never corrected before the decedent’s death. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence to the court and asks for a judicial determination that aligns legal title with the trust maker’s intentions. Preparing a petition requires collecting the trust document, any attempted transfer records, and declarations from witnesses or trustees who can explain the decedent’s actions and statements. The court will evaluate the totality of evidence to decide whether equity favors recognizing the asset as trust property. When successful, the petition avoids probate for that asset and allows trustees to administer or distribute it under the trust’s terms, preserving the trust maker’s plan.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies by county, court workload, and case complexity. Simple matters supported by clear documentary evidence and without opposition can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months. More complex situations that involve disputed facts, missing records, or contested objections may require a longer period, possibly extending to many months or more. Preparing thorough paperwork and serving interested parties promptly helps avoid procedural delays. Scheduling, response periods, and potential hearings affect timing. After filing, the court provides time for interested persons to respond, and a hearing may be set if there are objections or factual disputes. Efficient case management, clear evidence, and cooperative parties tend to shorten the timeline, while contested matters and extensive evidence gathering can lengthen it significantly.
The most helpful evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument itself, any draft or unrecorded deed showing intent to transfer, correspondence or notes where the decedent described funding the trust, and financial account records. Deeds or settlement statements showing attempts to transfer property, and records from financial institutions indicating beneficiary designations or ownership changes, are also useful. Evidence that shows consistent intent over time strengthens the petition. Declarations from trustees, family members, or others who heard or saw the decedent take steps to fund the trust are often persuasive when they describe specifics such as dates, conversations, and actions. Photographs, contemporaneous notes, and records of prior attempts to re-title assets can support the narrative and give the court a clear picture of why the asset should be treated as trust property.
Yes, beneficiaries or potential heirs can oppose a Heggstad petition. Opposition commonly arises when parties believe the asset should pass through probate, claim the trust is invalid, or contest the sufficiency of the evidence showing intent to fund the trust. When opposition occurs, the court considers the objections along with the petitioner’s evidence and may schedule a hearing to evaluate competing positions and witness testimony. Responding to opposition requires clear documentation and factual declarations that address the opponents’ concerns. Often, objections can be resolved through negotiation or additional evidence, but some disputes require a formal hearing. Preparing a well-supported petition and engaging in early communication with interested parties can reduce the likelihood and impact of opposition.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent the specific asset at issue from entering probate by establishing it as trust property, but it does not automatically remove other assets from probate or affect unrelated estate matters. The petition targets particular items whose title documentation is inconsistent with the trust maker’s intent. When the court recognizes the asset as trust property, that item is administered under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. However, not every petition succeeds; outcomes depend on the strength of evidence and the absence of legally persuasive objections. If the evidence is weak or contested and the court is not convinced, the asset may still be subject to probate. Careful preparation and comprehensive documentation increase the chances that the petition will achieve the intended probate-avoidance result for the disputed asset.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, costs of serving notice to interested persons, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting materials. The total amount varies based on case complexity, the need for additional discovery or document retrieval, and whether a hearing becomes necessary. Simple, uncontested petitions will generally be less costly than contested matters that require more extensive preparation and courtroom time. Reducing costs often depends on early organization of documents and cooperative parties who help locate records and provide timely declarations. When cases are contested or when substantial evidence gathering is required, costs can increase. Discussing expected steps and possible fee structures at the outset helps clients plan and understand likely expenses for pursuing a petition.
Yes, Heggstad petitions can apply to bank or investment accounts that remain titled in the decedent’s name despite an intention to fund a trust. Evidence such as account statements, correspondence with financial institutions, beneficiary designation forms, and witness declarations indicating the decedent’s intent are relevant. Financial institutions often require a court order or other proof to permit the trustee to access or transfer accounts, so a petition that secures a judicial declaration can be especially useful for these assets. In some cases, it may be possible to obtain corrective documentation from the financial institution without a petition if records clearly show the intent and the institution cooperates. When institutions are unwilling to act or when ownership is disputed, a petition provides a formal legal basis for recognizing the trust’s interest and enabling trustees to manage those accounts under the trust terms.
A hearing is not always required, but it may be necessary if interested persons object or if the court requests oral argument to resolve factual disputes. In uncontested matters where the petition and evidence are clear and no parties oppose, the court may decide the petition based on the written record. When a hearing is scheduled, it provides an opportunity to present witness testimony and address objections directly before the judge. Anticipating the possibility of a hearing is important during preparation. Gathering strong declarations and organizing documentary evidence to withstand scrutiny increases the likelihood that the court can reach a decision, whether through written submissions or at a hearing if one is needed. Good preparation also reduces surprises at the hearing stage.
Filing a Heggstad petition can initially extend the trust administration timeline because it introduces a formal court process and potential waiting periods for replies and hearings. However, obtaining a court order recognizing trust ownership often streamlines later administration by removing title uncertainty and clarifying the trustee’s authority. The net effect can be a faster overall distribution of the disputed asset compared with a protracted probate process or protracted negotiation among heirs. Planning ahead and organizing evidence promptly helps minimize delays related to the petition. When the petition resolves title questions early in administration, trustees can proceed confidently with asset management and distribution according to the trust’s terms, which may ultimately shorten the trust administration timeline for affected assets.
If you discover an asset that was intended for a trust but not transferred, start by locating the trust document and any relevant records such as deeds, account statements, settlement documents, or correspondence that indicate the decedent’s intent. Speak with family members or witnesses who may have knowledge about the transfer and document their recollections. Early organization of these materials helps determine whether corrective documentation or a petition is needed. Next, consult with a legal advisor who handles trust administration to evaluate the evidence and discuss whether a Heggstad petition is warranted. A legal review will help you understand likely outcomes, required notices, and procedural steps. Prompt action preserves evidence and can improve prospects for a successful resolution that aligns title with the trust maker’s intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas