A Heggstad petition can play a key role when assets were intended for inclusion in a trust but were never formally transferred. Residents of Rowland Heights who discover assets still in an individual name or otherwise outside the terms of a trust may benefit from filing a petition to have those assets treated as trust property. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can explain how California probate and trust law may address these situations and help clients preserve the intent behind their estate plans while minimizing delay and dispute. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful documentation, and tailored court filings when needed.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process is important for anyone administering a trust or handling a loved one’s estate in Rowland Heights. The petition asks a court to recognize trust ownership for assets that were intended to pass to the trust but were not properly titled. That outcome helps prevent probate and honor the decedent’s plan. Clients often turn to experienced counsel to gather evidence, prepare declarations, and present the petition to the court. Good preparation increases the chances that a judge will accept the trust-centered solution and avoid lengthier probate proceedings, reducing stress for family members during an already difficult time.
A successful Heggstad petition achieves a practical result: assets intended to be in a trust are legally treated as trust property, which preserves the decedent’s plan and often keeps those assets out of probate. That result can save time and expense and reduce public exposure of private estate details. The petition also provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries, allowing for a smoother administration of trust terms. For family members, this can mean fewer court appearances, faster distribution according to the trust, and a more predictable resolution of property issues. Preparing convincing evidence and an accurate legal record is a core part of securing these benefits.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has assisted California clients with estate planning and trust administration matters for many years, helping individuals and families navigate complex probate and trust-related challenges. We blend thorough document review with practical courtroom experience when filings are required. Our firm assists with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, trust amendments, and petitions to the court such as Heggstad petitions. We aim to provide clear guidance, keep families informed at each stage, and pursue outcomes that align with clients’ intentions while minimizing procedural delays and unnecessary expense.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request to treat property that was never retitled as though it had been transferred into a trust during the decedent’s lifetime. This remedy is available when the underlying documents and surrounding circumstances show a clear intent to fund the trust even if the formal title transfer was not completed. Courts examine declarations, transfer paperwork, and the overall estate plan to determine whether trust ownership should be recognized. For trustees and families, pursuing a Heggstad petition can resolve disputes about asset ownership and allow the trust to function as intended without a full probate process.
The legal standard for a Heggstad petition centers on intent and documentation, which makes the pre-filing investigation important. Evidence can include trust terms, draft or executed transfer instruments, correspondence, bank statements, and witness declarations that confirm intent to place assets into the trust. When preparing a petition, it is important to assemble a coherent record that demonstrates the transfer should be recognized. Timely action is often advisable because delays can complicate proof or allow other claims to arise. The petition procedure can vary by county, so local rules and practices in Los Angeles County should be considered when planning next steps.
At its core, a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain property belongs to a trust even though formal transfer paperwork was not completed before the decedent’s passing. The petition typically requests a judicial finding that the decedent intended the property to be trust assets, accompanied by supporting evidence. When granted, the court’s order clarifies title and allows the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms. This path helps avoid separate probate administration and ensures that the trust beneficiaries receive property according to the trust’s provisions rather than intestacy rules or a separate probate distribution.
Successful petitions rely on careful documentation and a stepwise approach. Typical elements include identifying the assets at issue, gathering documents that show intent to fund the trust, obtaining affidavits or declarations from individuals with first-hand knowledge, and preparing clear legal pleadings that present the evidence coherently. The petitioner must also follow local procedural rules for filing and serving interested parties. In some situations, negotiations with beneficiaries or interested parties resolve issues before a hearing. If the matter proceeds to court, persuasive declarations and proper exhibit organization are essential to demonstrate that trust treatment of the assets matches the decedent’s plan.
This glossary highlights terms commonly encountered in trust administration and Heggstad petition practice, providing plain-language definitions that help trustees and family members understand the process. Definitions cover what a trust is, the role of a trustee, how a pour-over will interacts with a trust, and what kinds of documentation courts consider persuasive when evaluating a petition. Familiarity with these terms helps clarify the evidence needed to support a petition and the possible outcomes of court involvement. Reviewing relevant documents early can streamline the petition process and reduce potential disagreements among heirs.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing asking the probate court to treat particular property as part of a trust despite a failure to complete the formal retitling required to transfer ownership. The petition must present evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent that the asset be governed by the trust. Evidence may include the trust document, declarations from the trustee or others, written transfer attempts, or account records. The court reviews these materials and may issue an order recognizing the property as trust assets, which facilitates trust administration and can avoid separate probate procedures for those assets.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets not properly placed into a trust during the decedent’s life into that trust upon death. It functions as a safety net to ensure the decedent’s overall estate plan funnels assets into the trust structure. While a pour-over will can send assets to a trust, property passing through a will may still be subject to probate administration. This is one reason why a Heggstad petition can be valuable when documents or actions show the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust instead of passing through probate.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets into a trust so that the trustee can administer those assets according to the trust terms. Funding often requires changing account titles, re-titling real property, or executing assignments of ownership rights. Failure to complete these steps may leave assets in the decedent’s name, creating the potential need for probate. Documentation showing steps taken toward funding, or clear intent to fund the trust, is central to Heggstad petitions that ask the court to recognize property as trust-owned despite incomplete formalities.
Trust administration is the process the trustee follows to manage, settle, and distribute trust assets according to the trust’s provisions and applicable law. Administration includes locating assets, paying debts and taxes, handling creditor claims, and distributing assets to beneficiaries. When title issues exist, such as assets not retitled into the trust, administration may require court action like a Heggstad petition to clarify ownership. Proper administration depends on careful documentation, timely communication with beneficiaries, and adherence to statutory duties and timelines under California trust and probate law.
When assets intended for a trust are not properly titled, families may consider several legal options, including filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or attempting informal resolution among beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition asks a court to recognize trust ownership and can avoid the broader probate process if successful. Probate may still be necessary for assets that cannot be shown to belong to a trust, which can add time and cost. Informal settlements sometimes resolve matters without court involvement, but those agreements require agreement among interested parties and thorough documentation to prevent future disputes.
A limited approach can be appropriate when documentation clearly shows the decedent intended a specific asset to be part of the trust and there is no realistic opposition from other parties. Examples include bank statements reflecting trust account activity, signed transfer forms that were prepared but not completed, or contemporaneous correspondence stating the intent to fund the trust. When records are strong and potential claimants agree, informal retitling or a simplified court filing may resolve the matter quickly and with minimal expense, preserving the trust’s terms without full probate administration.
In some situations the assets in question are modest in value or the beneficiaries are in agreement about the distribution, making a limited approach sensible. If parties share the same understanding and there are no competing claims, they may elect to resolve title informally or through a short court procedure that confirms ownership without an extensive hearing. This pathway reduces legal fees and administrative burden. Even when choosing a limited approach, documenting the agreement and any actions taken is important to reduce the risk of later challenges.
A comprehensive approach is often necessary when title issues are complex, assets are significant, or there are competing claims among heirs, creditors, or other parties. In those circumstances, thorough investigation and deliberate court filings may be needed to protect the trustee’s ability to administer the estate. That work typically involves gathering detailed documentation, preparing declarations from multiple witnesses, addressing objections, and presenting a clear legal argument to the court. When stakes are high, careful preparation reduces the risk of delays, appeals, or successful challenges to the trust’s intended distributions.
When documentation is incomplete, ambiguous, or missing, a thorough legal review becomes essential to reconstruct the decedent’s intent and prepare a persuasive petition. This may require obtaining witness statements, locating archival records, and analyzing prior transfers or account histories. A careful approach can identify the most probative evidence and craft declarations that address likely courtroom concerns. With this level of preparation, a petition can anticipate opposing arguments and present the facts in a way that helps the court reach a finding that aligns with the documented intent of the trust maker.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions and related trust issues limits uncertainty and helps protect the trust maker’s intentions. By assembling a complete evidentiary record, coordinating with beneficiaries, and adhering to local court practices, a well-prepared petition is more likely to succeed and achieve a timely resolution. Thorough preparation also reduces the risk of unexpected objections, loopholes in documentation, or procedural missteps that can cause delay. For trustees, that means clearer authority to manage assets and deliver distributions as the trust requires.
Comprehensive handling also provides ancillary benefits such as improved communication among family members and a structured plan for addressing related estate administration tasks. Preparing for potential contest scenarios, outlining likely outcomes, and documenting settlement efforts can prevent protracted litigation. When the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, the trustee gains legal clarity to take necessary actions like transferring assets, closing accounts, or completing distributions. The overall result is a more orderly and predictable administration that reflects the decedent’s wishes.
One key benefit of pursuing a thorough petition strategy is the potential to keep assets out of probate and preserve privacy. Probate proceedings are public and can be time-consuming, which can increase stress for family members. A successful petition that recognizes trust ownership allows the trustee to manage and distribute assets under the trust instead of through probate court, often streamlining the process. By documenting the decedent’s intent and addressing title issues proactively, trustees can minimize public exposure and expedite distribution according to the trust.
Comprehensive preparation places the trustee and beneficiaries in a stronger position if challenges arise. Detailed declarations, corroborating records, and clear legal arguments reduce the likelihood that an objector will prevail. Even where disagreements emerge, having a well-assembled record can facilitate negotiation or settlement and may deter meritless challenges. In addition, when the court issues an order based on extensive evidence, that order provides a durable resolution that helps close estate matters and permit final distribution under the trust’s terms.
Begin collecting all potentially relevant documents as soon as a trust funding issue is discovered. Useful records include the trust instrument, bank and account statements, deeds, transfer forms, correspondence indicating intent, and any drafts or notes about asset transfers. Witness statements from individuals who recall the trust maker’s instructions can also be valuable. Early collection reduces the risk that important evidence is lost, misfiled, or forgotten, and it allows for a more coherent presentation if a court filing becomes necessary. Organized records also help reduce disputes among beneficiaries by providing a clear factual basis for actions taken.
Court procedures and filing requirements vary across California counties, so familiarize yourself with the local rules in Los Angeles County and the Rowland Heights area. Timely service on interested parties, proper captioning of pleadings, and adherence to evidence presentation standards matter. Preparing declarations with clear exhibits, using appropriate forms where available, and calendaring deadlines for notices and hearings will streamline the submission. Taking account of local practice reduces procedural objections and helps ensure that the petition is considered on its substantive merits rather than delayed by technical deficiencies.
Consider filing a Heggstad petition when assets that were intended to be part of a trust remain titled outside the trust at the time of death and informal resolution is not achievable. A petition is useful when the trust maker’s intent is documented but formal retitling was not completed, and when leaving the asset to probate would undermine the trust plan or create unnecessary public administration. Petitioning the court to recognize trust ownership can maintain the trust’s distribution scheme and reduce the administrative burden of dealing with those assets separately in probate proceedings.
Another reason to consider the service is when multiple parties have competing positions about ownership or when creditor or tax issues could complicate administration. Filing a petition clarifies title and provides the trustee with judicial authority to act. It can also prevent future litigation by resolving the ownership question through a court order. When assets are significant or the family wishes to expedite distribution under the trust rather than through probate, a formal petition often provides the most reliable path to resolution.
Typical scenarios include a decedent who signed a trust but never completed the paperwork to retitle a bank account or deed, an attempted transfer that was left incomplete, or assets managed jointly that are subject to competing claims. Other situations involve transfers into a trust that were documented in part but lack the final step of changing the account title. Guardianship nominations or other estate planning instruments that reference trust distributions can complicate matters if title is inconsistent, creating a need for a judicial determination to align ownership with the decedent’s intentions.
A frequent occurrence is real property that the trust maker intended to fund to the trust but left titled in individual names. Deeds that were prepared but not recorded, or transfers that were delayed, can leave the property outside the trust. Because real property often constitutes a significant portion of an estate, clarifying ownership through a Heggstad petition can preserve the trust’s distribution plan and avoid probate for that parcel. Assembling deeds, transfer drafts, and witness declarations helps establish intent and supports the petition.
Bank or investment accounts that were meant to be owned by the trust but remained in the decedent’s personal name are another common trigger for a Heggstad petition. Such accounts may have been overlooked during lifetime re-titling or held in anticipation of transfer procedures that were not completed. Account statements, transfer forms, and correspondence with financial institutions can demonstrate the decedent’s intent. Recognizing these assets as trust property via a petition can simplify administration and allow the trustee to access and manage funds consistent with trust directions.
Mixed titling situations occur when different pieces of evidence point in different directions, such as partial paperwork, drafts, or inconsistent beneficiary designations. Conflicting documentation can create uncertainty about where assets belong. A Heggstad petition can reconcile these conflicts by presenting a coherent narrative of intent and supporting evidence. The court can then issue an order recognizing trust ownership when the record supports that conclusion, enabling orderly administration and limiting the potential for future disputes among heirs.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides legal assistance to families and trustees in Rowland Heights and surrounding Los Angeles County communities who face trust funding and title challenges. We help clients assemble evidence, prepare petition pleadings, coordinate service on interested parties, and present the record to the court. Our goal is to achieve clear legal recognition of trust ownership where appropriate, streamline administration, and reduce unnecessary delay. We also advise trustees on practical next steps after an order is obtained to ensure assets are properly managed and distributed under the trust.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for practical guidance through trust and probate challenges because we combine a thorough document-driven approach with an understanding of local court practices. We work closely with trustees and family members to gather the most persuasive evidence, prepare clear declarations, and navigate the applicable procedural requirements. Communication about timing, potential outcomes, and costs is an important part of our service, and we strive to keep clients informed at each step so they can make confident decisions during a difficult time.
Our firm also focuses on resolving title issues in a manner that aligns with the client’s goals, whether that means pursuing a petition, negotiating a settlement, or taking limited court action to confirm ownership. We carefully evaluate the facts of each situation, identify the most efficient path forward, and document efforts to notify interested parties. This attention to detail promotes durable resolutions that facilitate trust administration and limit avenues for future disputes, helping families move forward with distribution and financial matters.
We are accessible to clients throughout the process, offering practical advice about collecting records, communicating with financial institutions, and completing the necessary court filings. Our aim is to reduce uncertainty, provide realistic assessments of likely outcomes, and help trustees carry out their duties with confidence once an order is obtained. Whether the matter is straightforward or requires more extensive litigation, we tailor our approach to the needs of the client and the circumstances presented by the estate.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust documents, asset records, and any attempted transfer paperwork to determine whether a petition is likely to succeed. We then help assemble declarations, supporting exhibits, and a clear legal narrative for court review. We handle required notices and service to interested parties, explore potential settlements, and prepare court filings if agreement cannot be reached. Throughout the process we communicate options and timing, aiming to secure an order that recognizes trust ownership and allows the trustee to continue administration without unnecessary delay or expense.
The first step is a comprehensive evaluation of available documentation and a plan to collect additional evidence. This includes locating the trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, transfer drafts, correspondence, and any declarations from individuals aware of the trust maker’s intentions. We assess whether the record supports a petition and advise on the likely pathways forward. This stage sets the foundation for all subsequent filings by identifying the strongest factual support and any areas that may need further investigation or corroboration.
During document collection, we gather all potentially relevant records and evaluate them for probative value. This may include reviewing trust amendments, account histories, property deeds, and correspondence that references the trust and intended transfers. We also look for evidence of steps taken toward retitling and any communications with financial institutions. Careful examination helps determine which documents will form the core exhibits to a petition and whether witness declarations are needed to corroborate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust.
Witness statements and sworn declarations provide context and firsthand accounts of the trust maker’s intent and any actions taken to fund the trust. These statements can come from family members, advisors, or professionals who assisted with trust preparation. Declarations should be drafted to highlight relevant facts while anticipating questions a court might raise. Properly prepared declarations, together with documentary evidence, create a compelling narrative that supports the requested judicial recognition of the asset as trust property.
After compiling the evidence and drafting supporting materials, we prepare the formal petition seeking a judicial declaration that assets are trust property. This filing includes the petition itself, declarations, exhibits, and any required forms specific to the local court. Proper service and notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties are essential, and we handle those requirements in accordance with local rules. We also explore whether informal resolution is possible before a hearing, which can save time and expense for all involved.
Drafting clear pleadings involves presenting the factual record and legal argument in a manner that addresses common court concerns. Exhibits must be organized and referenced within declarations so the judge can readily review the supporting evidence. We ensure that documents are properly authenticated and that citations to the trust and related records are precise. Attention to detail in this stage minimizes procedural objections and positions the matter for a focused hearing on the central ownership question.
Proper service and notice give interested parties the opportunity to review the petition and respond if they have objections. We handle the logistics of service according to applicable rules and timelines, ensuring all required notices are filed. In many cases, the notice process also encourages early settlement discussions. If objections are filed, we evaluate them and prepare responsive pleadings or seek to resolve the dispute informally when appropriate, all while keeping the court informed about efforts to narrow issues and avoid unnecessary hearings.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition record and address any objections or questions that arise. The goal at hearing is to secure an order recognizing the asset as trust property so the trustee can administer it under the trust’s terms. Following an order, we assist trustees with practical steps like transferring titles, updating account records, and completing any filings required to reflect the change in ownership. This stage focuses on implementing the court’s order to facilitate proper and efficient trust administration.
Presenting the case involves summarizing the documentary evidence, guiding testimony through declarations, and explaining why the record supports a finding of trust ownership. We prepare to address common judicial concerns and respond to objections grounded in competing title claims or procedural defects. Clear, organized presentation of exhibits and declarations helps the judge understand the trust maker’s intent and the basis for the requested ruling. The hearing is an opportunity to resolve title issues decisively and obtain an order the trustee can rely upon.
Once the court issues an order, we advise trustees on the practical steps needed to implement the decision, including recording deeds, retitling accounts, and providing court-certified copies of the order where institutions require them. We also help resolve any follow-up matters such as creditor claims, tax reporting, or distribution logistics. Ensuring proper implementation avoids future disputes and allows beneficiaries to receive assets under the trust in a timely and orderly manner.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare certain property to be part of a trust despite a failure to complete formal retitling before the decedent’s death. It applies when the trust document and surrounding circumstances demonstrate the trust maker’s intent to have the asset governed by the trust, but the legal title remained in the person’s name. The petition sets out the evidence of intent and requests that the court recognize trust ownership so the trustee can administer the asset under the terms of the trust. Courts look for a coherent evidentiary record when evaluating a petition. This can include the trust instrument itself, draft or executed transfer documents, account records, and declarations from people with direct knowledge of the trust maker’s intentions. When the court finds the evidence persuasive, it can issue an order treating the asset as trust property, which helps avoid separate probate administration for that asset and aligns distribution with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is focused on recognizing specific assets as trust property, whereas probate is a broader process that administers an estate when assets are distributed under a will or under intestate succession rules. Probate typically involves validating a will, paying debts and taxes, and distributing remaining assets under court supervision. By contrast, a successful Heggstad petition allows particular assets to be administered through the trust, often avoiding probate for those assets and keeping administration private and consistent with the trust maker’s intent. Choosing between petitioning and initiating probate depends on the assets involved and the clarity of evidence showing intent. When strong documentation supports that an asset was intended for the trust, a petition can be the more efficient path. If evidence is lacking or contested, probate may become necessary for final disposition, and a careful evaluation of the facts will guide the appropriate legal strategy for each asset.
Typical evidence includes the trust document, any executed but unrecorded deeds or transfer forms, bank or account statements reflecting intent to fund the trust, and correspondence that references planned transfers. Declarations from individuals who directly observed the trust maker’s actions or instructions are also important. Courts assess the totality of the record to determine whether the preponderance of evidence supports treating the asset as part of the trust. Supporting documents should be organized and authenticated where possible, and witness statements should address key facts such as conversations about the trust and any efforts made to retitle assets. Proactive collection and careful presentation of evidence increase the likelihood the court will accept the petition and issue an order that facilitates trust administration.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition, and the court will provide them an opportunity to be heard. Notice and service requirements ensure that interested parties receive the petition and have the chance to file objections or present competing evidence about ownership. When objections arise, the court evaluates the evidence from all sides to determine whether the trust ownership claim is supported. If objections are raised, negotiations or settlement discussions sometimes resolve disagreements without a contested hearing. When disputes proceed to court, the party seeking recognition of the asset as trust property must present a convincing record that supports the requested finding. A carefully prepared petition anticipates likely objections and addresses them through declarations and documentary exhibits.
The timeline can vary depending on the complexity of the title issues, the need to gather evidence, local court schedules, and whether objections are filed. In straightforward, uncontested matters where documentation is strong, a petition may be resolved relatively quickly once filed and served. Complex or contested cases may take longer, requiring additional discovery, briefing, or multiple hearings before the court reaches a decision. Planning for the process includes allowing time for evidence collection, proper service on interested parties, and any administrative steps required by the local court. Communicating with beneficiaries and addressing potential objections early can shorten the timeline and reduce the chance of protracted litigation.
Costs vary based on the scope of work required, including document collection, drafting pleadings, handling service, and attending hearings if necessary. A relatively simple, uncontested petition will generally cost less than a contested matter that requires extensive factual development and courtroom advocacy. Our office discusses fees and likely costs upfront so clients can make informed decisions about the most appropriate approach for their circumstances. Efforts to gather records promptly and reach agreement with interested parties can reduce expense. When the stakes are high or objections are likely, investing in thorough preparation often saves time and cost overall by avoiding delays, repeated filings, or appeal-level disputes that increase expense and prolong resolution.
If a Heggstad petition is denied, the court has determined that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate an intent to treat the asset as trust property. In that event, the asset may remain subject to probate administration, or parties may pursue alternative remedies if available. The trustee and beneficiaries would need to review next steps, which might include additional evidence, reconsideration, or negotiation with interested parties to reach an agreed resolution outside of a court order. A denial does not always mean the end of the matter; sometimes further factual development or clarification can change the outcome. Careful assessment of why the petition was unsuccessful helps identify whether supplemental evidence or a different legal pathway can accomplish the trust maker’s objectives while complying with the court’s reasoning.
Yes, Heggstad petitions can address a range of asset types, including bank accounts, investment accounts, and real property, when the facts support recognition of trust ownership. The evidence needed will vary by asset: deeds and title documents are often central for real estate, while account statements, transfer forms, and correspondence may be more important for financial accounts. The court’s focus remains on whether the trust maker intended the asset to belong to the trust despite a failure to complete formal retitling. Each institution may have its own procedures for updating titles after a court order, and a successful petition usually needs to be followed by practical steps like recording a certified order or presenting it to a bank to retitle accounts. We assist trustees with both obtaining the court order and implementing the post-order steps to reflect trust ownership properly.
Sometimes matters can be resolved without a court filing if interested parties reach an agreement about ownership and sign the necessary documents to reflect the transfer into the trust. Informal resolutions require unanimous agreement among those with an interest in the asset and clear documentation of the transfer to avoid future disputes. Negotiated outcomes can save time and cost but depend on cooperation among beneficiaries and other interested parties. When agreement cannot be reached or the evidence is contested, a court filing may be the most reliable way to obtain a binding determination. Even when a filing is ultimately necessary, early settlement efforts are often beneficial and can reduce the scope of contested issues, so attempting informal resolution is frequently a sensible first step.
To begin, gather the trust document and any relevant records such as deeds, account statements, transfer drafts, and correspondence that reflect the trust maker’s intentions. Make a list of potentially interested parties, including beneficiaries, heirs, and institutions holding the assets, and preserve any records that relate to attempted transfers. Early organization of documents helps determine whether a petition is appropriate and what evidence will be needed. Next, contact counsel to evaluate the assembled records and discuss the likely options. An attorney can advise whether a Heggstad petition is the proper vehicle, what evidence would be persuasive in your county, and how to proceed with notices and filings. Taking prompt steps to document the facts and discuss strategy reduces uncertainty and positions trustees to act effectively on behalf of the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas