If you are considering a trust modification petition in San Pedro, this guide explains how the process works, who can file, and what outcomes to expect. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across California with trust issues including modifications, terminations, and court petitions. A trust modification petition may be appropriate when circumstances change, when ambiguities in the trust documents create disputes, or when life events require a legal adjustment. This overview helps you understand the legal route to adjust a trust and how to prepare supporting documentation and evidence to present a persuasive case to the court.
Trust modification petitions involve legal procedures to alter terms of an existing trust under California law. Whether you are a trustee, beneficiary, or interested party, obtaining clarity on the grounds for modification, court timelines, and potential outcomes helps reduce stress and uncertainty. The firm draws on decades of estate planning experience to assess whether a petition is likely to succeed and to identify alternatives such as settlement discussions or negotiated amendments. This section lays out realistic expectations for filing, the types of relief the court may grant, and how legal counsel can support documentary preparation and procedural filings throughout the case.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can protect beneficiary interests, clarify trustee authority, and adapt estate plans to changing circumstances. When a trust no longer reflects the grantor’s intent or when unforeseen events create inequities or administrative problems, the court can approve adjustments that preserve the trust’s integrity. Filing a petition may prevent lengthy disputes, enable efficient administration, and ensure assets are distributed in a way that aligns with updated needs. Proper legal guidance helps present persuasive evidence, manage procedural requirements, and negotiate with other interested parties to reach an outcome that balances legal standards and practical family considerations.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services across California, including representation for trust modification petitions in San Pedro. Clients benefit from a firm history of representing individuals and families through complex estate matters, from drafting trust instruments to handling contested petitions in probate court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough case preparation, and practical solutions that reflect each client’s goals. The firm is responsive to client concerns and prioritizes timely handling of petitions to reduce emotional strain and avoid delays in trust administration and asset distribution.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to change one or more terms of a living or testamentary trust under California law. Grounds for filing include mistakes in the trust document, changes in tax or family circumstances, or other situations where the original terms no longer serve the grantor’s intent. The petition must clearly state the legal basis for modification, present supporting evidence such as declarations or documentary proof, and follow strict procedural rules. Understanding these foundational elements helps set expectations for timelines, notices to interested parties, and potential court inquiries during the proceeding.
The process typically begins with evaluating the trust document and gathering evidence to demonstrate the need for change. Notices to beneficiaries and other interested parties must be provided under California probate rules, and the court may schedule hearings to consider objections. Sometimes issues can be resolved through negotiation or mediation before a contested hearing. Having counsel that prepares a coherent legal argument and organizes documentary support reduces the likelihood of surprises and enhances the chance of a favorable outcome. A careful factual record and persuasive legal presentation are central to successful petition practice.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms, administration, or provisions of a trust. The petition must identify specific provisions to be modified, explain the legal grounds such as mistake, changed circumstances, or ambiguity, and propose the precise relief sought. Courts weigh the grantor’s intent, the interests of beneficiaries, and statutory provisions to determine whether a modification is proper. Remedies can include clarifying language, reformation of terms to reflect intent, or removal of administrative obstacles that prevent proper trust administration while protecting beneficiary rights.
Preparing a petition involves drafting a clear legal statement of the facts, attaching the relevant trust documents, collecting supporting declarations, and ensuring all necessary notices are served. The petitioner must follow California probate procedures for filing, pay required fees, and be prepared to respond to objections or requests for additional evidence. Hearings may focus on credibility of testimony, interpretation of trust language, and whether the proposed modification respects the grantor’s intent. Proper case chronology, exhibits, and witness declarations are essential to present a persuasive, court-ready petition.
This glossary highlights common terms encountered during a trust modification petition, providing plain-language definitions to help you navigate filings and court processes. Knowing definitions for terms such as grantor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, and decanting allows you to follow pleadings and understand the issues presented. Familiarity with these concepts streamlines communications with counsel and helps you comprehend proposed court orders. The goal is to equip clients with language and context so they can make informed decisions throughout petition drafting, served notices, and any hearings that may follow.
Grantor refers to the individual who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The grantor’s original intent and the language of the trust document are central to any petition seeking modification, since courts aim to honor what the grantor intended. When the grantor is alive, they may have limited ability to consent or execute amendments depending on the trust terms. If the grantor is deceased, the court will interpret the document in light of the grantor’s intent and applicable law to decide whether a modification is justified.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from the trust. Beneficiaries have standing in modification proceedings and will usually receive formal notice of petitions that could affect their interests. Courts consider beneficiary objections and priorities when evaluating whether a proposed change unfairly affects distribution outcomes. Beneficiary rights include reviewing trust accounting, receiving notices of significant actions, and responding in court to petitions that alter distribution timing or amounts.
The trustee is the individual or institution charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms. Trustees may file petitions to clarify their powers, modify administrative provisions, or seek court instructions when duties are unclear. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including loyalty and prudent administration, and the court monitors trustee actions to ensure those duties are respected. If a trustee seeks a modification, the petition should explain how the change supports proper administration while protecting beneficiary interests.
Reformation is a legal remedy that allows the court to correct or modify the trust document to reflect the grantor’s actual intent when the written terms contain mistakes or were affected by clerical errors or ambiguity. Reformation requires convincing evidence about the intended terms and that the written document fails to reflect those intentions. Courts exercise caution with reformation given the importance of preserving testamentary intent and will generally require clear and convincing evidence to grant such relief.
When addressing trust problems, you may choose a limited approach such as negotiation or targeted court instruction, or pursue a full modification petition that seeks substantive changes. Limited measures might resolve minor administrative questions quickly and with less expense, while a comprehensive petition seeks broader judicial approval for substantive changes and can provide finality. Choosing between options depends on the goals, complexity of the trust, positions of beneficiaries, and potential for litigation. Counsel can evaluate whether a limited action is practical or whether broader judicial relief is necessary to protect long-term interests.
A limited approach can be effective when the issue concerns interpretation of administrative provisions or when parties agree on a narrow clarification. If the trustee and beneficiaries can reach consensus on a practical interpretation or short-term administrative step, this avoids the time and expense of a full court petition. Such agreements should be documented in writing and, when appropriate, presented to the court for ratification. When parties are cooperative and the needed change is minor, negotiating an agreed amendment or obtaining a court instruction can be an efficient resolution.
Mediation and settlement discussions can resolve disputes over trust administration and reduce the need for contested petitions. Neutral facilitation helps parties explore compromise options that preserve relationships and achieve practical solutions without the formality of trial. Mediation can be particularly useful when the conflict stems from communication breakdowns or mistaken assumptions about the trust terms. Documenting and formalizing any agreement reduces the risk of future disputes and can often be incorporated into the trust record or a stipulation filed with the court.
A comprehensive petition is appropriate when proposed changes affect beneficiary distributions, alter fiduciary powers, or correct significant legal errors that cannot be addressed through simple agreement. When beneficiaries disagree or the stakes involve meaningful financial interests, the court’s determination provides enforceable finality. A full petition allows the court to review evidence, hear objections, and issue orders that resolve ambiguities. Preparing a comprehensive petition requires careful factual development, legal argumentation, and readiness to respond to opposing positions in hearings or trial.
Comprehensive petitions yield court orders that bind all parties and reduce the chance of future litigation over the same issues. When parties seek certainty about trustee powers, distribution schemes, or trust construction, a judicial ruling provides clarity and enforcement mechanisms. This approach is often preferred where ambiguity threatens long-term administration or when potential conflicts could undermine asset distribution plans. A sustained legal resolution reduces ongoing administration risk and helps trustees act confidently under court guidance.
A court-approved modification can permanently resolve disputes, clarify trustee authority, and ensure distributions align with applicable legal standards. By securing judicial approval, parties obtain enforceable orders that reduce the likelihood of future challenges and provide a clear roadmap for asset management. This route can be particularly valuable where multiple beneficiaries have competing interests or where trust language is ambiguous. The clarity produced by a court order supports consistent administration and reduces administrative delays that might otherwise arise from contested interpretations.
In addition to finality, a comprehensive approach allows the court to consider equitable factors and craft orders tailored to preserve the grantor’s intent while addressing practical realities. Courts can appoint special administrators, approve accounting practices, or restructure trustee powers to support efficient administration. These remedies are designed to balance legal requirements and practical family considerations, reduce friction among interested parties, and protect asset values during prolonged administration. The result is a structured, legally enforceable plan for moving forward under court supervision.
One central benefit of comprehensive court action is finality: a court order resolves disputes in a way that is legally binding on all parties. This enforceability prevents repeat litigation over the same issues and gives trustees the ability to act with confidence. When trustees implement court-approved modifications, beneficiaries and creditors have clear expectations regarding distributions and administration. Final orders also provide remedies for noncompliance and create a public record that documents the legal basis for changes, which can be important for tax and estate administration.
A court can craft remedies that address both legal and practical concerns, such as clarifying ambiguous language, appointing interim administrators, or restructuring trustee powers to reduce conflict. This tailored approach helps ensure the trust functions as intended while accommodating unavoidable changes. Administrative clarity reduces day-to-day disputes and makes it easier for trustees to fulfill duties. Courts may also order accounting or reporting measures to increase transparency and protect beneficiary interests, resulting in smoother trust administration going forward.
Assemble the original trust document, all amendments, beneficiary designations, and related financial records before filing a petition. A complete record strengthens your case by showing the trust’s evolution and any discrepancies that justify modification. Include correspondence, trustee reports, account statements, and any documents that show the grantor’s intent or administrative difficulties. Well-organized exhibits and clear chronological documentation help the court evaluate the petition efficiently and reduce opportunities for procedural disputes or evidentiary objections from other parties.
Explore mediation or settlement discussions before pursuing a contested hearing, especially when relationships among beneficiaries are strained but compromise remains possible. Alternative dispute resolution can preserve family relationships, reduce legal fees, and result in solutions crafted to meet everyone’s practical needs. If mediation succeeds, document the agreement and, when appropriate, formalize it through a court filing or stipulated order to ensure enforceability. ADR often leads to quicker, more private resolutions that avoid the time and uncertainty of prolonged litigation.
Consider a trust modification petition when trust provisions no longer reflect changed family circumstances, contain drafting errors, or create administrative difficulties that hinder proper asset management. Life events such as remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in asset values can render original terms impractical or unfair. If the trustee faces legal uncertainty about their powers or if beneficiaries dispute distribution terms, court action can provide clarity and enforceable solutions. Early assessment of these issues helps determine whether formal modification or another remedial step is most appropriate.
You should also consider a petition when third-party interests such as creditor claims or tax consequences require court-reviewed changes to how assets are held or distributed. When documentation is ambiguous or when the grantor’s intent is in doubt, a judicial determination can protect trustee decisions and reduce exposure to future claims. Where the alternative is prolonged conflict or inefficient administration, a well-supported petition may be the most reliable path to preserving asset value and ensuring distributions align with both legal requirements and stated intentions.
Common reasons to file a trust modification petition include clerical errors in the trust instrument, changed family dynamics, inability of the trustee to perform duties, ambiguities that generate dispute, or unforeseen tax consequences. Other circumstances include the discovery of assets not addressed in the original trust or conflicting beneficiary designations that require court resolution. Each case requires careful factual investigation to identify the right legal theory, whether reformation, modification by court order, or instruction to the trustee, and to assemble evidence that supports the requested relief.
Ambiguities in trust language can produce conflicting interpretations among beneficiaries and trustees, leading to disputes that hinder administration. In such situations, a petition asking the court to interpret or reform the provision can provide binding guidance. The court evaluates the grantor’s intent, the trust’s overall structure, and extrinsic evidence such as drafts or correspondence that shed light on the intended meaning. Resolving ambiguity protects the trust’s operation and reduces the chance of inconsistent actions by trustees or contested distributions.
Life changes like births, deaths, divorce, or significant shifts in asset values can make trust terms impractical or inequitable. When the trust no longer achieves the grantor’s apparent goals, parties may seek modification to realign outcomes with current realities. Courts consider whether changes were foreseeable and whether modifying the trust better serves the documented intent while protecting beneficiary expectations. Courts also weigh the potential impact on non-requesting beneficiaries, seeking solutions that balance fairness and the trust’s continuing validity.
Drafting mistakes or omissions may leave out intended beneficiaries or misstate distribution rules, creating administrative problems and potential unfairness. Petitioning the court to correct clear drafting errors or to incorporate the grantor’s demonstrated intent helps restore the trust to its intended form. Proof might include earlier drafts, communications with the drafter, or other documents that demonstrate what the grantor meant. Courts require reliable evidence to make these changes and exercise care to ensure that adjustments reflect the grantor’s true wishes.
Residents of San Pedro and surrounding Los Angeles County areas can access personalized assistance for trust modification petitions through the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman. The firm provides clear guidance on procedural steps, document collection, and strategic options tailored to local probate court practices. Whether you need help evaluating the strength of a petition, preparing declarations, or negotiating with beneficiaries, you can expect responsive communication focused on practical outcomes. The firm works to reduce procedural delays and ensure that filings comply with county court procedures to keep the process moving forward.
Selecting the right legal partner for a trust modification petition is important because the success of the petition often depends on thorough preparation and clear presentation. Our firm emphasizes careful case assessment, transparent fee discussions, and thoughtful planning so clients understand their options and likely outcomes. We focus on practical solutions that aim to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting legal rights. Clear written communication and consistent client updates are central to how the firm supports individuals through each step of the petition process.
Clients benefit from assistance beginning with initial document review and continuing through filing, notice, and hearings. The firm can coordinate with financial institutions, gather necessary records, and prepare the declarations and exhibits needed to support a petition. Where settlement is appropriate, the firm negotiates with opposing parties to achieve enforceable agreements. When litigation is unavoidable, we prepare the factual record and legal arguments thoroughly to present a clear case to the court while managing procedural deadlines and evidentiary requirements.
Communication and client-focused service are priorities to ensure clients understand options and possible timelines. The firm explains the court process in plain terms, helps clients weigh alternatives such as mediation versus litigation, and keeps parties informed about filing schedules and hearing dates. This practical approach reduces uncertainty and empowers clients to make decisions that align with their long-term objectives for trust administration and asset protection, while also addressing the immediate needs that prompted the petition.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust documents and the circumstances prompting the request for modification. We identify the most appropriate legal basis for the petition and gather supporting evidence including declarations, financial records, and any communications that show the grantor’s intent. We prepare the petition and all required notices, coordinate proper service on interested parties, and monitor court timelines. If objections arise, we seek to resolve them through negotiation or present a focused evidentiary case at hearings to achieve enforceable outcomes for trust administration.
The first step is a thorough evaluation of the trust documents, amendments, and related materials to determine if a petition is appropriate and what relief to seek. We review grantor communications, prior drafts, and any accounting records to build a factual narrative. Preparation includes drafting declarations, compiling exhibits, and outlining the legal grounds under California law. This front-end work ensures the petition clearly articulates the need for modification and that evidentiary support is organized for filing and potential hearings.
Careful review of all trust-related documents is essential to identify inconsistencies, omissions, or language that supports a petition. We examine the operative trust instrument, amendments, beneficiary designations, and any related estate planning documents. Gathering supporting evidence such as correspondence, financial records, or prior drafts helps demonstrate the grantor’s intent. This phase also identifies parties who must receive formal notice and any potential procedural hurdles that could affect the timing or scope of the petition.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires a clear statement of facts, a proposed order, and supporting declarations that present documentary evidence. We assemble exhibits in a logical sequence, prepare witness statements when necessary, and draft legal argumentation tailored to court standards. Attention to procedural form and detail ensures the petition complies with local rules and reduces the risk of technical challenges. Clear, organized pleadings improve the court’s ability to evaluate the request and speed resolution.
After filing the petition, required notices must be served on beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with probate rules. The court will set timelines for responses and may require additional documentation. If objections are filed, the parties may engage in discovery, negotiation, or motion practice to narrow issues. Our role includes coordinating service of process, tracking response deadlines, and responding to any procedural requests from the court to keep the matter moving efficiently toward resolution.
Proper notification of beneficiaries and interested parties is essential to establish the court’s jurisdiction and permit parties to assert rights or objections. We prepare required notices, certify service, and, where necessary, document diligent search efforts for missing parties. Clear communication with notified parties can sometimes reveal common ground and open opportunities for negotiated settlements or agreements that streamline court involvement. When parties are cooperative, the court process can be simplified and expedited.
If objections arise, parties may exchange information through informal disclosure or formal discovery. We manage responses to discovery requests, prepare any needed declarations to address contested facts, and propose procedural paths such as mediation or focused hearings to resolve disputes. Efficient handling of objections reduces delay and narrows the factual issues the court must decide. Where possible, we seek agreements that limit contested matters and reduce litigation costs while protecting client interests in the final outcome.
If matters remain contested, the court will hold hearings to evaluate the petition and objections. Hearings focus on credibility of declarations, the interpretation of trust language, and legal standards for modification or reformation. We present a clear, evidence-based narrative and propose a precise order that implements the court’s decision. Once the court issues its order, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, and advising trustees on administration steps necessary to comply with the modified terms and maintain accurate documentation for beneficiaries and accounting purposes.
At hearing, the focus is on presenting a concise record that supports the requested modification, including witness declarations and documentary exhibits. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present legal argument linking facts to the legal standard for modification or reformation. Clear presentation helps the court understand the grantor’s intent and the practical need for change. Judges often appreciate streamlined hearings that focus on dispositive issues, and careful preparation increases the likelihood the court will issue a considered, enforceable order.
After the court issues an order, trustees must update trust records, notify affected institutions, and take any administrative steps required by the new terms. We assist with drafting amended documents, submitting required filings, and ensuring financial institutions accept the order for account changes. Proper follow-up avoids confusion and ensures distributions and management proceed under the court-approved framework. Maintaining accurate records and communicating changes to beneficiaries helps prevent further disputes and supports smooth long-term administration.
California allows trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes other interested parties to file a petition seeking modification or reformation of a trust. Trustees may petition to clarify their powers or seek instructions from the court when duties are uncertain. Beneficiaries who believe the trust terms are incorrect or unfair may also initiate proceedings to correct errors or seek a judicial interpretation. Standing is determined by the probate code and depends on whether the party has a direct interest in the outcome of the trust’s terms or administration. Before filing, it is helpful to evaluate the strength of the petition by reviewing the trust document, related estate planning instruments, and any evidence of the grantor’s intent. Notice requirements mean other interested parties will be informed and have an opportunity to respond. Early case assessment can identify procedural issues and potential for resolution through negotiation, which may avoid contentious court hearings and delay in trust administration.
Common legal grounds for modification include clerical mistakes, ambiguity in the trust language, changed circumstances that frustrate the grantor’s intent, or provisions that prevent efficient administration. Reformation is used to correct written errors that do not reflect the grantor’s actual intent, while modification petitions may seek practical adjustments when circumstances fundamentally change. Each ground requires factual support that the court can evaluate, often through declarations and documentary evidence showing intent or the need for change. The required showing varies with the remedy sought. Courts are cautious with changes that affect beneficiary distributions and generally require persuasive evidence to deviate from clear trust language. Strong factual documentation and a well-prepared legal argument help the court determine whether the requested relief properly reflects the grantor’s intent and balances beneficiary rights with the need for administrative efficiency.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the degree of opposition from beneficiaries, and the court’s schedule. Simple petitions with cooperative parties can be resolved in a matter of weeks or a few months, while contested petitions may extend several months to a year or more. Factors such as discovery requests, interim hearings, and the need for additional evidence can lengthen the process significantly. Engaging counsel early and preparing a thorough petition with organized exhibits can shorten delays by anticipating common objections and procedural requirements. Pursuing mediation or settlement talks alongside court filings can also expedite resolution. Clear communication with the court and timely responses to procedural requests further reduce the likelihood of unnecessary postponements.
Yes, California law requires that beneficiaries and other interested parties receive notice of a trust modification petition so they can respond or object. Proper service is a key procedural requirement that establishes the court’s authority to decide the matter and protects the rights of those affected by potential changes. Notices must be documented and, if a party cannot be located, the petitioner should show diligent efforts to effect service according to court rules. Providing accurate notice can sometimes open channels for negotiation that lead to settlements or stipulated agreements, reducing the need for contested hearings. When parties are properly informed and engaged early, misunderstandings may be resolved without prolonged litigation, saving time and expense for all involved.
A trustee’s power to modify a trust without court approval depends on the authority set out in the trust document and applicable law. Some trusts contain provisions that allow trustees to make limited administrative adjustments or to exercise discretion in certain circumstances. However, when changes affect fundamental distribution terms or when the trust lacks explicit modification authority, court approval may be required to prevent challenges and ensure enforceability. When in doubt, seeking court instruction or filing a petition provides legal protection for trustees acting in good faith under ambiguous circumstances. Court involvement reduces the risk of beneficiary objections and potential personal liability by obtaining an order that clarifies the trustee’s powers and authorizes the requested actions under the trust’s revised terms.
Supporting a reformation request generally requires evidence showing that the written trust does not reflect the grantor’s actual intent due to mistake or drafting error. This evidence can include prior drafts, correspondence with the drafter, contemporaneous statements, and other documentation that indicates what the grantor intended. Affidavits or declarations from witnesses who observed the grantor’s intent may also be persuasive when coupled with documentary proof. The court will evaluate the totality of the evidence and may require clear and convincing proof for substantial changes that affect distributions. Building a coherent evidentiary narrative that ties documents to the grantor’s intent and demonstrates the inconsistency in the written document increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling on reformation requests.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiation among beneficiaries, mediation, and stipulated agreements that clarify terms without a contested hearing. When parties are willing to compromise, a mediated settlement can produce practical outcomes that preserve family relationships and reduce fees. Documenting any agreements and presenting them to the court for approval, when appropriate, makes resolutions enforceable and reduces the risk of subsequent disputes. Another option is seeking limited court instructions rather than a full modification, which can resolve technical issues or administrative questions more quickly. Assessing alternatives early helps determine whether litigation is necessary or whether a negotiated path offers an effective and less adversarial solution.
If beneficiaries object to the petition, the court will provide an opportunity to present evidence and argument before ruling. Objections may focus on the legal basis for modification, evidentiary sufficiency, or the potential impact on distributions. Resolving objections may involve discovery, additional declarations, or focused hearings to narrow contested facts. Effective case management and clear communication can sometimes encourage settlement even after objections are filed. When objections persist, the court will weigh competing evidence and legal authority to decide whether modification or reformation is warranted. Preparing a clear factual record and legal theory in advance helps address common objections and improves the court’s ability to render a decisive, enforceable order.
Yes, a petition can seek clarification or modification of a trustee’s administrative powers when those powers impede efficient trust management or when the trust language is unclear. Courts can authorize changes that improve administration, appoint temporary administrators if needed, or delineate limitations on trustee actions to protect beneficiary interests. Such orders are useful in resolving disputes about investment decisions, distribution timing, or authority to sell assets. When proposing changes to administrative powers, the petition should explain how the modification supports sound administration and what safeguards will protect beneficiaries. Courts balance the trustee’s need for practical powers with beneficiary protections, and well-documented proposals that include oversight mechanisms are more likely to be accepted.
Before contacting a lawyer, gather all trust-related documents including the trust instrument, amendments, beneficiary designations, recent account statements, and any correspondence related to the trust. Creating a clear timeline of events and noting key facts such as changes in family circumstances will enable the attorney to evaluate the situation efficiently. If possible, gather any drafts or notes that might show the grantor’s intended terms. Having this information ready reduces delays and allows counsel to advise on options more accurately during the initial consultation. Provide names and contact information for trustees, beneficiaries, and any known financial institutions that hold trust assets so counsel can promptly assess notice requirements and identify potential procedural steps for filing a petition if that is the recommended course.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas