A Heggstad petition is a legal tool used to transfer assets into a trust on behalf of a deceased person when the decedent’s intent to fund a living trust is clear but formal transfer was not completed during life. In Santa Fe Springs and throughout Los Angeles County, these petitions help families avoid full probate for assets that should have passed to a trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides thoughtful counsel on whether a Heggstad petition fits your case and how to proceed in California courts. We explain the process, required evidence, and likely outcomes so you can make informed decisions during an already difficult time.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that certain assets were never retitled into the living trust, despite clear intent. A Heggstad petition can allow those assets to be treated as trust property if testimony and documentation show the decedent intended the trust to own them. This can significantly streamline administration, reduce costs, and keep more matters private. Our approach is to gather the relevant estate planning documents, witness statements, and asset records, present a persuasive petition to the court, and pursue a practical resolution that respects the decedent’s wishes while minimizing delay and expense for heirs and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition matters because it can prevent assets from meandering through full probate when the decedent plainly intended those assets to be part of a living trust. Filing a petition can restore the trust’s intended operation and preserve privacy by avoiding public probate administration. It also can save time and reduce administrative expense for heirs, as trust administration typically requires fewer court procedures than probate. For families that find discrepancies between trust documents and title records, the petition process provides a clear legal path to align ownership with the decedent’s plan, helping to carry out their final wishes efficiently and with less disruption.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings decades of estate planning and trust administration practice to matters involving Heggstad petitions. Based in California, we represent clients across Los Angeles County, including Santa Fe Springs, with sensible, compassionate guidance. Our firm focuses on careful document review, fact gathering, and persuasive presentation of a client’s case to protect estate planning goals. We work closely with family members to collect declarations, financial records, and witness statements that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund a living trust, and then guide the petition through the probate court to achieve an outcome that honors the decedent’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare certain assets as trust property even though they were not formally re-titled into the trust before the decedent’s death. To succeed, petitioners generally present documentation and witness statements showing the decedent intended the trust to own the assets. This may include the trust instrument, drafts, correspondence, or testimony from the person who prepared the trust. The court then evaluates whether the supporting evidence meets California standards to treat the asset as a trust asset, allowing administration under the trust’s terms rather than through full probate administration.
The procedural path for a Heggstad petition includes filing the petition in probate court, giving notice to interested parties, and presenting evidence at a hearing. Courts look for clear indications of intent and may weigh competing claims. Outcomes can include court orders that transfer title into the trust or directives on how assets should be distributed under the trust terms. The process can resolve disputes, clarify authority for trustees, and prevent unnecessary probate steps, but it requires careful evidence gathering and strategic legal argument to present the decedent’s intent convincingly to the court.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that certain property belongs to a trust even though formal transfer paperwork was not completed prior to the decedent’s death. It is named after a California case that established the legal framework for courts to recognize the decedent’s intent when the transfer process was unfinished. The petition relies on documentary and testimonial evidence, and the goal is to effectuate the decedent’s plan without requiring full probate administration. When successful, the petition brings the asset under the trust’s direction, enabling distribution according to the trust rather than intestate or probate procedures.
Successful petitions typically present a combination of the trust document itself, communication showing intent to fund the trust, declarations from the person who prepared the trust, and evidence of the asset’s connection to the trust. Other helpful items include checklists, correspondence about asset transfer, and records demonstrating an intent to treat the asset as trust property. The process involves careful review of title documents, coordination with financial institutions when accounts are involved, and submission of persuasive declarations to the court. Thorough preparation helps to shorten proceedings and reduce the risk of contested outcomes.
Understanding the terminology in the Heggstad petition process helps family members and trustees know what to expect. Key concepts include trust corpus, testamentary intent, probate jurisdiction, petitions and declarations, and trustee obligations. Knowing these terms clarifies the evidence courts require and the legal effects of a favorable ruling. Clear definitions also assist in gathering the right documents and statements to support the petition. Familiarity with these terms empowers clients to participate effectively in the process and to understand the implications of court decisions for the estate and beneficiaries.
Trust corpus refers to the assets that make up a trust’s holdings. These are the properties, accounts, and other assets that a trust is intended to hold and manage for the benefit of named beneficiaries. When a trust is properly funded, the trust corpus is clear and readily identifiable. A Heggstad petition often focuses on bringing a particular item into the trust corpus when evidence shows that the decedent intended that asset to be part of the trust but formal transfer into trust records did not occur before death. Establishing trust corpus avoids unnecessary probate for those assets.
A petition is a formal request filed in probate court asking the judge to take a specific action, such as recognizing an asset as trust property under a Heggstad petition. Declarations are sworn statements provided by witnesses or involved parties detailing facts and observations relevant to the petition. Declarations may be prepared by the person who drafted the trust, family members, or others with personal knowledge of the decedent’s intent. Both petition and declarations form the evidentiary core of the case and must be presented in a clear, organized manner to support the requested relief.
Testamentary intent refers to the decedent’s clear intention regarding how their property should be distributed or managed after death. In the context of a Heggstad petition, proving testamentary intent means showing that the decedent intended particular assets to be included in a trust. This can be demonstrated by the trust document, correspondence, witness statements, and consistent patterns of behavior indicating the decedent treated the assets as trust property. Courts evaluate the totality of evidence to determine whether the decedent’s intent supports granting the petition.
Probate jurisdiction refers to the court’s legal authority to resolve disputes and oversee the administration of estates and related matters. Heggstad petitions are filed in probate court because they concern the court’s power to determine ownership of assets and the proper mechanism for carrying out the decedent’s plan. The probate court evaluates the evidence and issues an order that can change how an asset is administered. Understanding probate jurisdiction helps parties know where to file, how notice must be served, and what procedural steps the court will require.
When assets are not titled in the name of a trust, families often face the choice between filing a Heggstad petition or proceeding through conventional probate. A Heggstad petition can allow assets to be administered under the terms of the trust when evidence supports the decedent’s intent, typically reducing court supervision and preserving privacy. Probate can be more public and can involve broader court oversight, but it is a direct method to clear title and settle claims. Choosing the most appropriate path depends on the evidence, the size and nature of the estate, and the family’s goals for speed, cost, and privacy.
A limited approach such as a Heggstad petition can be sufficient when there is clear documentary evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Examples include the trust document itself, drafts showing the transfer plan, or correspondence instructing transfer of title. When such documentation is strong and uncontested, the court can often recognize the asset as trust property with minimal additional procedures. This approach can avoid the expense and publicity of full probate while honoring the decedent’s documented wishes and simplifying administration for trustees and beneficiaries.
A limited filing may also work well when interested parties are in agreement that the asset belongs in the trust. When heirs and beneficiaries share the same understanding and are willing to provide supporting declarations or sign stipulations, the court process can move forward with less opposition. Agreement among parties reduces litigation risk and can expedite court approval of a petition. Even when parties agree, careful documentation and court filings are still necessary to convert that agreement into an enforceable court order that transfers assets into the trust’s administration.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when ownership of an asset is disputed or when there are competing claims from creditors or family members. In such situations, more in-depth investigation, motion practice, and courtroom advocacy may be required to protect the estate and the trust’s intended distribution. Comprehensive representation includes thorough evidence collection, drafting persuasive pleadings, negotiating with opposing parties, and presenting the strongest possible case to the court so that the decedent’s plan can be honored and potential litigation risks are addressed.
Complex assets like business interests, retirement accounts, or real property with entangled title histories can require a more involved strategy. Resolving these matters may entail working with financial institutions, title companies, and other professionals to assemble evidence and clear title. A comprehensive approach anticipates procedural challenges, coordinates necessary third-party cooperation, and develops fallback strategies if initial petitions are contested. Such preparation reduces delays and helps ensure that assets are properly administered under the terms of the trust once the court’s determinations are secured.
A comprehensive approach provides a full review of estate documentation and assets, identifies potential obstacles early, and develops a tailored court filing strategy. By anticipating contested issues and collecting supporting declarations and records in advance, the process tends to proceed more smoothly. This can lower overall costs compared to drawn-out litigation and reduce uncertainty for beneficiaries. A careful plan also helps minimize delays in accessing and distributing assets, allowing trustees to carry out the decedent’s wishes with clarity and authority granted by the court when necessary.
Comprehensive representation also places priority on clear communication with family members and interested parties to reduce misunderstandings and potential conflict. When everyone understands the process and the evidence supporting the petition, contested outcomes become less likely. The firm coordinates with institutions, secures necessary documentation, and prepares the strongest possible presentation to the court, which can preserve family relationships and facilitate an orderly administration that aligns with the decedent’s expressed intentions. This measured approach helps secure durable outcomes that withstand later challenges.
Thorough preparation before filing often reduces the time and expense involved in obtaining court approval. Collecting essential documents, securing declarations from relevant witnesses, and resolving title questions in advance can prevent continuances and additional discovery. This front-loaded work shortens the path to a final order and lessens the administrative burden on trustees and beneficiaries. By organizing materials and communicating with court personnel and other parties, the process moves more efficiently, which ultimately benefits the estate by conserving assets that would otherwise be consumed by prolonged court involvement.
A comprehensive strategy improves the likelihood of a favorable and durable court decision by presenting the strongest available evidence and legal arguments. With well-prepared declarations, documentary proof of intent, and attention to procedural detail, courts are better positioned to recognize assets as trust property. This reduces the risk of later challenges and provides trustees with a clear basis for distributing property under the trust. Greater certainty benefits beneficiaries by clarifying rights and enabling prompt administration in accordance with the decedent’s documented plan.
Start by locating the trust document, any drafts, correspondence, and records that tie the asset to the trust. Bank statements, brokerage records, and emails that discuss moving an account into the trust can be persuasive. Also collect declarations from the person who prepared the trust or others who witnessed discussions about funding. Clear documentary evidence reduces the need for extended fact-finding and helps the court quickly see the decedent’s intent. Organizing these materials early shortens the timeline and strengthens the petition’s presentation in court.
Engaging financial institutions or title companies early can uncover simple administrative steps to resolve title issues without extended litigation. Sometimes a bank will accept a court order or a certified copy of trust documents to retitle an account. Title companies may assist in clearing records for real property matters. Early communication often reveals documentation the institution requires and may lead to cooperative solutions. If disputes remain, those records still help form the evidentiary basis for a successful Heggstad petition in court.
You should consider a Heggstad petition if assets that were intended for a living trust were not formally transferred before death and you wish to avoid full probate administration. Filing a petition can align legal title with the decedent’s plan, reduce court supervision, and preserve privacy. It is especially useful when documents and testimony show clear intent but paperwork is incomplete. Acting promptly to gather evidence and file the appropriate petition can streamline administration and help beneficiaries receive their distribution according to the trust terms rather than through a lengthy probate process.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to resolve uncertainty about who has authority to manage or distribute particular assets. A court order recognizing assets as trust property clarifies the trustee’s role and authority, which can be important when third parties or institutions question a trustee’s right to act. By obtaining clarity through the court, trustees can avoid disputes and proceed with administration. In cases where disagreement among heirs might arise, a properly supported petition can provide a strong legal foundation for orderly distribution under the trust.
Typical scenarios include bank or brokerage accounts left in the decedent’s name, real property with outdated title, or assets purchased late in life that were intended to be included in the trust. Other situations involve changes to estate planning documents that were not fully implemented or accounts that a decedent believed had been moved but were not. When heirs and trustees find mismatches between trust documents and actual asset titles, a Heggstad petition can bridge that gap by asking the court to recognize the decedent’s intent and bring those assets under trust administration.
Accounts that remained in the decedent’s individual name instead of being re-titled in the trust are a frequent cause for Heggstad petitions. These accounts may have been intended to fund the trust but paperwork was overlooked. Proof that the decedent intended the trust to own these assets—through statements, trust drafts, or preparer declarations—can persuade the court to order those accounts treated as trust property. Filing a petition can prevent lengthy probate and align account ownership with the trust’s terms for distribution to beneficiaries.
Real property that was never deeded into the trust or that retains an outdated title can present a significant administration issue. A Heggstad petition supported by the trust instrument, drafting records, and credible testimony may allow the court to recognize the property as trust-owned. This resolves the gap between the decedent’s estate plan and record title, enabling the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the property under the trust’s instructions rather than through a separate probate process, which can be more time-consuming and public.
Assets purchased or transferred close to the time of death sometimes miss administrative steps necessary to retitle them into a trust. When evidence shows the decedent intended these assets for the trust, a Heggstad petition can address the oversight. Documentation might include purchase contracts referencing the trust, conversations captured in emails or notes, or declarations from professionals involved in preparing paperwork. The petition helps ensure these late-acquired assets are treated consistently with the rest of the estate plan and distributed under the trust’s terms.
Although based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including Santa Fe Springs and Los Angeles County, in matters involving trust administration and Heggstad petitions. We provide thoughtful legal representations that focus on careful document review, evidence gathering, and practical court filings. If your family is facing title discrepancies or incomplete trust funding, we can assess the situation, advise on whether a petition is appropriate, and guide you through the process to secure a court order that reflects the decedent’s intentions while minimizing delay and cost.
Our firm takes a methodical and client-centered approach to Heggstad petitions. We prioritize thorough investigation into the estate documents and asset records, coordinate with financial institutions and title companies where appropriate, and prepare clear, persuasive petitions and declarations for court review. Communication with family members is managed sensitively to reduce conflict and uncertainty. We focus on practical solutions that align with the decedent’s planning and aim to resolve title issues efficiently so trustees can act with confidence in administering the estate.
We handle each matter with attention to procedural detail, making sure notice is properly given and court filings comply with local probate rules. Our work includes assembling required evidence, preparing sworn declarations, and advocating for an order that places assets under the trust’s oversight. By anticipating potential objections and addressing them proactively, we aim to minimize delays and litigation costs. Clients appreciate that we aim for clarity in the process, keeping beneficiaries informed and focused on achieving the goals set out in the decedent’s planning documents.
When coordinating with institutions or opposing parties, we advocate for practical resolutions that preserve estate value and honor the decedent’s wishes. Whether you need help collecting documents, filing the petition, or representing the estate at a hearing, we provide guidance tailored to your situation. Our commitment is to deliver realistic options and to guide clients toward an outcome that secures clear title and eases trustee administration under California law, all while keeping in mind the family dynamics that often accompany estate matters.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the asset, review trust documents, and assess the supporting evidence of intent. We then collect necessary records, prepare sworn declarations, and coordinate with relevant institutions to obtain account statements or title records. Next, we draft and file the petition with the probate court and serve required notices to interested parties. If a hearing is necessary, we present the evidence and request a court order recognizing the asset as trust property. After the order, we assist with implementation and title changes as needed to effectuate the court’s determination.
In the first step we evaluate the trust document, asset records, and any communications that show the decedent’s intention to include the asset in the trust. We identify potential declarants and gather supporting paperwork, such as drafts, correspondence, or preparer’s notes. This early-phase work determines the strength of a petition and frames the legal strategy. We also review title records and contact institutions to learn what documentation is required to effectuate transfers, which shapes the preparation of declarations and exhibits for the petition.
We carefully review the trust instrument and all related estate planning documents to confirm terms and beneficiaries. This includes examining any amendments, pour-over wills, or related directives that demonstrate intent to fund the trust. Understanding the trust’s terms clarifies which assets should be included and how distributions should proceed. This analysis helps shape the declarations and evidentiary approach needed to establish that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, forming the foundation for a successful petition.
Collecting supporting records involves obtaining account statements, deeds, purchase agreements, and communications that link the asset to the trust. We also prepare declarations from the person who drafted the trust, trustees, family members, or financial professionals who recall specific conversations or actions showing intent. These statements are drafted to be clear, factual, and meaningful to the court. Effective declarations combined with documentary evidence present the strongest possible case for recognizing the asset as trust property.
After assembling evidence and drafting declarations, we prepare the petition and supporting exhibits for filing with the probate court. Proper service of notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and interested parties follows local rules to ensure due process. The filing details the asset in question, the legal basis for the petition, and the evidence supporting the decedent’s intent. Timely and correct filings reduce the likelihood of procedural challenges and set the stage for the court’s review of the matter at a hearing or on submitted papers.
Court filings must be organized, clear, and supported by admissible exhibits. We prepare the petition, attach the trust instrument and supporting documents, and include sworn declarations that recount the facts in a way the court can evaluate. Exhibits are labeled and referenced throughout the petition for ease of review. Careful attention to detail in the filing minimizes the risk of defects that could cause delays and ensures the court can readily assess the merits of the requested relief.
Proper service to all interested parties is essential to the court’s jurisdiction and the enforceability of any resulting order. Once notice is served, interested parties may raise objections or disputes. We evaluate any objections, respond in writing when appropriate, and attempt to resolve issues through stipulation or focused legal argument. If litigation over the petition arises, we prepare to defend the petition with an emphasis on factual clarity and legal precedent that supports recognition of the asset as trust property.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, address any concerns raised by interested parties, and request an order recognizing the asset as trust property. Following a favorable ruling, we assist with the practical steps needed to implement the court’s order, such as providing certified copies of the order to financial institutions or recording documents with the county recorder for real property. These steps finalize the transition of the asset to trust administration so that distribution under the trust can proceed.
At the hearing we highlight the most persuasive documentary and testimonial evidence of the decedent’s intent, guiding the court through the sequence of facts that support the petition. We respond to questions and any opposing representations, ensuring the court has a clear record to base its decision upon. The goal is to secure an order that places the asset into the trust corpus or otherwise clarifies its treatment under the trust’s terms, enabling trustees to carry out the decedent’s wishes.
After the court enters an order, we coordinate with banks, brokerage firms, title companies, and other institutions to effectuate any required retitling or payment instructions. We provide certified court documents and liaise with third parties until the asset is administered under the trust. In cases involving real property, we assist with recording the order or related documents. These final steps ensure the court’s determination is translated into practical control and distribution consistent with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that seeks a judicial declaration that an asset should be treated as part of a living trust, even though formal retitling did not occur before the decedent’s death. It arises when the decedent clearly intended for the trust to own the property but administrative steps to transfer title were not completed. Parties present the trust instrument, supporting documents, and sworn declarations showing intent and actions taken toward funding the trust. The court then evaluates the evidence and may order the asset to be treated as trust property, allowing distribution under the trust’s terms. This remedy is used to align legal title with the decedent’s estate plan and to minimize the scope of probate. While not every case qualifies, a well-documented record of intent—such as drafts, correspondence, or declarations from the trust preparer—can persuade the court. The process helps families avoid extensive probate administration for assets that were meant to be administered through the trust, and it provides a legal pathway to effectuate the decedent’s wishes when paperwork was incomplete.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the matter, local court schedules, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, well-documented petitions with agreement among interested parties can sometimes be resolved in a few months, allowing for evidence gathering, filing, and court review. More complex cases with contested ownership, multiple interested parties, or title complications may take longer, especially if discovery or multiple hearings are required. Factors that affect timing include the need to obtain records from financial institutions or title companies, the availability of declarants, and the court’s calendar. Early, thorough preparation and clear communication with interested parties can shorten the timeline, while disputes or procedural issues will extend it. Planning for potential delays helps families make practical arrangements during the process.
The most persuasive evidence typically includes the trust instrument itself, drafts showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and correspondence or notes discussing transfer of particular assets. Declarations from the person who prepared the trust and from individuals who witnessed discussions about transfer can carry weight when they provide specific, factual details under penalty of perjury. Financial records tying an account or property to the decedent’s intent to use the trust strengthen the petition significantly. Other helpful materials are receipts, purchase documents, trustee notes, or emails that reference the trust. Clear, chronological documentation that connects the asset to the trust plan helps the court understand the decedent’s intent and the steps taken toward transfer. Combined, these elements create a coherent narrative that supports granting the requested relief.
A Heggstad petition can prevent certain assets from going through full probate if the court recognizes them as trust property. When the petition succeeds, the asset is administered under the trust’s terms, which typically involves less court supervision and less public exposure than probate. However, not all assets or situations qualify; the court’s decision depends on the evidence presented and whether the decedent’s intent can be shown with reasonable clarity. Even when a petition is successful, other estate matters may still require limited probate steps, depending on the estate’s composition and creditor issues. Securing a Heggstad order for specific assets helps reduce the overall scope of probate administration but may not eliminate all probate obligations if other untitled assets or claims exist.
When filing a Heggstad petition, notice must be given to heirs, beneficiaries, heirs-at-law, and any parties who might have an interest in the asset, as required by California probate rules. This ensures due process and allows interested parties to respond or object if they believe the petition is unwarranted. Proper service is essential to the court’s jurisdiction and to avoiding later challenges to the order. The exact list of required notice recipients depends on the estate’s circumstances, the asset involved, and local rules. We analyze the situation and prepare a notice plan that complies with statutory requirements, ensuring that interested parties receive timely information and have an opportunity to participate in the proceedings if they choose to do so.
If someone objects to the Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection alongside the petition and supporting evidence. Objections may raise questions about ownership, intent, or proper notice. The court may require additional evidence, hold a contested hearing, or order limited discovery to resolve disputed facts. Responding to objections requires focused legal argument and supplemental documentation to address the concerns raised by objecting parties. In many instances, objections can be resolved through mediation, stipulation, or additional declarations. When resolution is not possible, the court will adjudicate the competing claims. Thorough preparation and a clear evidentiary record help the court weigh objections and can increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling for the petitioner.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include initiating a probate proceeding to clear title or pursuing nonjudicial solutions with institutions or title companies. In some cases, banks or brokerages may accept court-certified documents or substitute procedures to change account ownership without a formal petition if all interested parties agree. For real property, quiet title actions or corrective deeds may be options depending on the circumstances. Each alternative has advantages and limitations depending on the asset and the parties’ willingness to cooperate. Choosing the most appropriate route depends on the strength of the evidence, the degree of agreement among interested parties, and the desired balance between speed, cost, and confidentiality. We evaluate alternatives and recommend the approach that best aligns with the estate’s facts and goals, seeking the most efficient path to a resolution.
A favorable court order recognizing an asset as trust property is an important step, but immediate distribution to beneficiaries may still require procedural follow-through. For instance, banks or title companies may require certified copies of the order and additional documentation before releasing funds or changing ownership records. The trustee must also comply with the trust’s terms for distribution, which may include notification and waiting periods. Once the order is implemented with the necessary institutions and any administrative steps are completed, beneficiaries can receive distributions according to the trust. The timing depends on how quickly third parties honor the court order and on the trustee’s compliance with the trust’s distribution requirements and any applicable creditor notice periods.
Courts may request live testimony at a hearing if they believe it will help resolve factual disputes, though many petitions are resolved based on declarations and documentary evidence. Witnesses such as the person who prepared the trust or close family members who recall discussions about funding the trust can provide helpful testimony. Whether testimony is required depends on the completeness of the written record and the existence of objections that necessitate more thorough fact-finding. When testimony is expected, we prepare witnesses to provide clear, factual accounts and to tie their observations directly to the documents filed with the court. Properly prepared declarations can sometimes limit the need for live testimony, but when live testimony is needed, presenting credible and consistent witness accounts improves the petition’s chance of success.
When the court recognizes an asset as trust property through a Heggstad petition, the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute that asset under the trust’s terms is clarified. The order provides legal recognition that the asset belongs to the trust, allowing the trustee to carry out duties such as sale, transfer, or distribution consistent with the trust instrument. This helps prevent third parties from contesting the trustee’s actions and provides a clear legal basis for administration. The trustee must still follow the trust’s provisions and applicable law, including any notice or debt resolution obligations. The court order facilitates trustee action by removing title impediments, but trustees continue to have fiduciary responsibilities to act in the best interests of beneficiaries and to administer the trust in accordance with governing documents and California law.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas