When a trust no longer reflects your goals or circumstances, a trust modification petition can provide a path to update terms, correct errors, or address changes in family, finances, or law. The process involves preparing legal documents, demonstrating the required grounds for modification, and filing a petition with the appropriate court in Los Angeles County if necessary. A well-crafted petition and clear supporting documentation help present the case efficiently and reduce delays. This page explains what a trust modification petition is, when it may be appropriate, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approaches these matters for clients in Signal Hill and the surrounding communities.
A trust modification petition may be sought for many reasons, including changes in beneficiary needs, tax planning adjustments, removal of ambiguities, or to reflect changed intentions after life events like marriage, divorce, or inheritance shifts. Not every change requires court involvement; some trusts include amendment procedures that allow adjustments without a petition. When court approval is required, clarity in the petition, supporting affidavits, and any consent from interested parties will affect the outcome. Understanding the legal standards, realistic timelines, and potential objections from beneficiaries helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a modification.
Seeking a trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s original intentions while addressing newly arisen issues that the trust did not anticipate. A court-approved modification can resolve ambiguities in trust language, correct administrative errors, update fiduciary powers, and adapt distributions to changed family or financial circumstances. By having the change formalized through the court, parties achieve legal clarity that reduces future disputes and streamlines trust administration. The process also provides an opportunity to document consent from beneficiaries or explain why consent is not feasible, which can prevent contested litigation later on and protect family relationships.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists California clients with estate planning and trust matters, including trust modification petitions for residents throughout Los Angeles County and Signal Hill. Our approach focuses on careful document review, practical planning, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to identify the best route forward. We handle petitions, prepare necessary pleadings, coordinate supporting affidavits, and work to reach consensual resolutions whenever possible. If court intervention is required, we prepare a persuasive record tailored to the applicable statutory standards and local court practices so clients have a clear path to achieving their goals.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking a court to change the terms of an existing trust or to clarify ambiguity that affects administration. Reasons for filing can include correcting drafting errors, adapting distributions to reflect changed circumstances, addressing tax considerations, or modifying administrative provisions like trustee powers and successor appointment. The court evaluates the request based on statutory criteria, the trust instrument, any consent from interested parties, and evidence that the change aligns with the settlor’s intent or statutory grounds for modification. Petition preparation requires attention to procedural rules and careful proof of the factual basis for the requested change.
Not all trust changes require court approval; many trusts contain provisions for amendment or revocation by the settlor while living. When such provisions are not available or when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, parties may need to petition the court. The petition must identify the trust, explain the requested modification, state the reasons, and list interested parties. Courts often prefer resolutions based on beneficiary consent, but will grant modifications when the law and facts support the request. Knowing when court intervention is necessary and how to present the matter efficiently is essential to achieving timely results.
A trust modification petition formally requests a court to change or interpret the terms of a trust because of changed circumstances, drafting errors, or other legal reasons. The petition typically outlines the history of the trust, the authority relied upon to support modification, the proposed changes, and the reasons those changes are appropriate. Supporting documents may include the original trust instrument, certifications, affidavits from relevant parties, and any consent forms. Courts review the petition in light of statutory standards and the settlor’s intent, balancing the need for clarity and fairness to beneficiaries with respect for the original document.
Core elements of a successful trust modification petition include a clear description of the requested change, evidence supporting the basis for modification, identification of interested parties, and any consents or objections. The process often starts with a careful review of the trust instrument, client interviews, and collection of supporting evidence such as medical records or financial statements when relevant. After drafting the petition and supporting declarations, the documents are filed with the court and served on interested parties. The court may schedule a hearing, encourage settlement discussions, or rule based on the written record if no contest arises.
This glossary defines key terms you may encounter during a trust modification petition, including settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, affidavit, and court order. Understanding these definitions helps clarify roles and expectations throughout the process. The settlor is the person who created the trust, the trustee administers the trust according to its terms, and beneficiaries receive distributions. A petition is the formal request to the court, and affidavits provide sworn statements supporting the facts of the case. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to follow procedural steps and to communicate effectively with legal counsel and other parties.
Settlor refers to the individual who created the trust and established its terms and purposes. The settlor’s expressed intentions and the language of the trust instrument are central to any modification dispute because courts strive to honor the settlor’s wishes when legally possible. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, the court evaluates evidence about the settlor’s intent, such as prior drafts, related documents, or testimony from those who knew the settlor’s preferences. Understanding who the settlor is and what they intended is a foundational part of preparing a petition to modify a trust.
Trustee denotes the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust according to its terms and in the interests of the beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to manage trust assets prudently, follow distribution provisions, and avoid conflicts of interest. When a modification petition is filed, the trustee is an important party who may consent to or resist changes depending on fiduciary considerations and possible liability. Trustees may also be tasked with implementing approved modifications and ensuring that any court orders are properly executed and incorporated into trust records.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries can be current recipients of income or principal, contingent recipients, or remainder beneficiaries. Their interests can be affected by proposed modifications, so courts and trustees typically notify beneficiaries of petitions and consider objections. A beneficiary’s consent can greatly streamline the process, but if consent is absent or impossible, the court assesses whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and the law. Understanding beneficiary interests helps shape strategy for seeking changes.
A petition is the formal court filing requesting a change to the trust, clarifying its terms, or seeking judicial approval for other trust-related actions. The petition must identify the trust, the proposed modification, the legal basis for relief, and the interested parties. Supporting evidence is typically included through declarations or exhibits. Once filed, the petition triggers notice and service requirements so that beneficiaries and other interested parties can respond. The court evaluates the petition in light of statutory criteria and the factual record before deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
When considering changes to a trust, clients can often choose between informal approaches such as beneficiary agreements or trustee actions, versus formal court petitions. Informal resolutions may be faster and less costly when all parties agree, but they may not be sufficient if the trust language prevents unilateral changes or when a settlor cannot act. A petition offers a binding court determination and can be necessary to resolve disputes, fix errors, or handle situations involving incapacity or the settlor’s death. Evaluating the pros and cons, including timing, cost, and potential for objections, helps determine the most appropriate path.
If the trust document explicitly allows the settlor to amend or revoke trust provisions while alive and competent, those in-place amendment procedures can often be used without court involvement. Similarly, trustees and beneficiaries may reach written agreements to address administrative matters or clarify ambiguous language when the trust permits such actions. These limited approaches are generally quicker and less expensive than filing a petition. However, ensuring that any informal steps fully comply with the trust terms and state law is important to avoid future challenges or misunderstandings among beneficiaries.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a modification and the trust permits such agreements, parties can often execute a written consent that documents the change and updates trust records. Unanimous consent reduces the need for court intervention and can preserve privacy and reduce costs. It is important to ensure that the agreement includes clear language about the changes, any conditions, and how the modification will be implemented to avoid ambiguity. Legal oversight in drafting the consent helps ensure enforceability and alignment with the settlor’s original intent and applicable law.
When beneficiaries disagree or when a trustee’s authority is disputed, a formal petition provides a structured process for resolving conflicts and obtaining a definitive court ruling. Litigation or contested petitions require careful factual development, legal argument, and management of procedural requirements such as notice and service. The court’s decision can resolve competing claims and provide guidance on trust administration moving forward. Engaging comprehensive legal services helps ensure the record is prepared effectively and that the client’s position is presented clearly to the court.
Certain modifications raise complex issues such as tax consequences, ambiguous terms that affect significant assets, or allegations of undue influence or incapacity at the time the trust was created. In such circumstances, court approval and a thorough legal presentation are often necessary to produce a binding and enforceable result. Preparing for these petitions requires gathering medical, financial, and testimonial evidence, and anticipating objections. A well-managed petition can address complex facts and deliver a solution that protects the interests of the trust and the beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification includes careful initial planning, document review, communication with beneficiaries, and thorough preparation of any court filings. This proactive method helps identify potential problems early, reduces the likelihood of costly disputes, and increases the chance of obtaining a prompt and favorable result. Managing both the legal and practical aspects of a modification, including tax and administrative implications, produces solutions that align with the settlor’s intent and the beneficiaries’ needs. Clear communication and documentation create a durable record for future trust administration.
Comprehensive handling also provides benefits in matters involving multiple jurisdictions or complex assets, such as real estate, retirement accounts, and business interests. Coordinating with financial advisors, trustees, and other professionals ensures that the modification is implemented effectively and that all ancillary documents, like certification of trust or affirmations for banks and brokers, are updated. This integrated approach protects the trust’s value, simplifies future administration, and reduces the risk of unintended consequences or creditor claims that might result from poorly planned changes.
By obtaining a court order for modifications when appropriate, parties secure a legally enforceable document that clarifies successor duties, distribution terms, and administrative rules. This reduces uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries and helps avoid future litigation over interpretation or compliance. A clear judicial determination also simplifies interactions with financial institutions and title companies by providing authoritative direction on how the trust should be administered moving forward.
A thorough process that considers the needs and concerns of beneficiaries can reduce conflict and preserve family relationships while achieving necessary modifications. By providing notice, encouraging dialogue, and documenting agreements or court-approved changes, the process fosters transparency and trust among parties. When disputes do arise, a comprehensive approach seeks solutions that balance fairness and the settlor’s wishes, helping to maintain stability in trust administration and reducing future contested matters.
Begin by collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, beneficiary designations, and financial statements. Documentation such as medical records, financial statements, and correspondence about the settlor’s intentions can be important when preparing a petition. Early document gathering speeds up the process and allows for a realistic assessment of whether a petition is necessary, whether informal amendments are possible, or whether beneficiary consent might be obtained. Organizing records also helps identify interested parties who must be notified in any court proceeding.
Modifying trust terms can have tax or administrative impacts, especially where retirement accounts, life insurance, or significant real estate holdings are involved. Consider consulting with financial and tax advisors to understand potential consequences and structure modifications to minimize unintended liabilities. Preparing updated trust certifications and beneficiary communications ensures financial institutions and title companies accept the changes. Anticipating these practical issues avoids delays in asset transfers and helps maintain continuity in trust administration after the modification is approved.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions, when language errors create uncertainty, or when changed circumstances make current provisions impractical. Events such as divorce, remarriage, a beneficiary’s disability, or changes in tax law often prompt reevaluation of trust provisions. If the settlor lacks the ability to amend the trust directly, a petition may be the appropriate method to obtain a court order that preserves the settlor’s intent and aligns distributions with present realities. Timely action can prevent further complications during trust administration.
Clients also consider a petition when dealing with trustee misconduct, ambiguous successor appointment language, or when consolidating multiple trust instruments into a single coherent plan. A court-approved modification provides a clear legal framework for trustees to follow and for financial institutions to recognize. In many cases, the petition clarifies long-term administration, protects beneficiaries’ rights, and streamlines the transition of assets. Understanding the legal standards and likely outcomes helps determine whether a petition is the most efficient route.
Typical circumstances prompting a trust modification petition include clarifying ambiguous language, correcting drafting mistakes, adjusting distributions after a beneficiary’s death or changed needs, and addressing tax-related restructuring. Other common reasons are disputes over trustee powers, removal or replacement of trustees, or correction of errors affecting property title. When these situations cannot be resolved through informal means or when the settlor cannot act, a petition to the court provides the necessary authority to address the issue and establish a clear path forward for trust administration.
When marriages, divorces, births, or deaths alter family dynamics, trust terms that once made sense may need adjustment. Such changes can affect beneficiary needs, guardian nominations, and distribution timing. A petition can update the trust to reflect new priorities, provide for dependents with special needs, or rebalance distributions among beneficiaries. When possible, documenting beneficiary consent can simplify matters. In cases where disagreements exist, court approval clarifies how the trust should operate going forward.
Drafting errors, ambiguous language, or omitted provisions can create confusion for trustees and beneficiaries. A petition to correct or interpret the document helps avoid misadministration and potential litigation. The court may reform the trust to reflect the settlor’s probable intent or clarify confusing provisions to guide trustees. Providing evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or testimony that sheds light on the settlor’s intentions can be instrumental in winning approval for corrective modifications.
When trustee actions raise concerns about proper administration, or when a trustee must be removed, modified trustee powers or successor appointments often require court involvement. Administrative problems like difficulty transferring title, unclear certification language, or institutional refusal to accept trustee directions can necessitate a petition to resolve practical obstacles. In these situations, the court can issue orders that clarify the trustee’s authority, mandate turnover of assets, or provide other remedies necessary to preserve trust value and ensure proper administration for beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to Signal Hill residents facing trust modification questions, offering guidance from initial document review through petition filing and court proceedings if needed. Our team listens to client goals, evaluates the trust instrument and relevant facts, and recommends the most efficient path forward—whether through beneficiary agreements, trust amendments, or court petitions. We prioritize clear communication and practical solutions so clients understand timing, likely outcomes, and the steps required to accomplish modifications while protecting beneficiaries and trust assets.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we focus on careful legal preparation, thoughtful client communication, and effective handling of procedural requirements for trust petitions. We review documents thoroughly, identify potential issues early, and prepare filings designed to address the court’s concerns. Our approach aims to resolve matters efficiently through negotiation when possible while being prepared to present a strong factual record when court action is necessary. Clear guidance throughout the process provides clients with confidence and predictable next steps.
We also assist with related estate planning documents and administrative matters to ensure modifications are properly implemented. That includes preparing updated trust certifications, notifying financial institutions, and coordinating with trustees, beneficiaries, and advisors to effectuate the court’s directives. This integrated handling reduces the risk of implementation errors and future disputes, and helps organizations and professionals accept the updated trust terms without delay. Practical follow-through after approval is an important component of our service.
For clients in Signal Hill and across Los Angeles County, our office is available to discuss case specifics, timelines, and options. We provide transparent information about likely steps, required evidence, and potential outcomes so that clients can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or seeking alternative solutions. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation or to request an initial document review. We aim to be responsive and clear about how to move forward with trust matters.
Our process begins with an intake and document review to understand the trust, the desired changes, and the positions of trustees and beneficiaries. We assess whether informal resolution is possible, or whether a petition is the recommended path. If a petition is needed, we draft the pleadings, gather supporting declarations and exhibits, ensure proper notice to interested parties, and file with the appropriate court. Throughout, we communicate status updates, explore settlement opportunities, and prepare for any necessary hearings to achieve a durable result for clients.
The initial review focuses on understanding the trust instrument, identifying any amendment clauses, and gathering background information from the client and other available documents. We evaluate whether beneficiary consent is feasible, whether administrative fixes are available, and whether the facts support a petition. Establishing a strategy at the outset helps control costs and reduces surprises. We also identify what evidence will be needed for a court petition and develop a timeline consistent with court filing and service requirements.
We carefully examine the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents such as wills and powers of attorney, and any prior communications that shed light on intent. A detailed client interview uncovers the history, goals, and potential witnesses or records to support a petition. This early diligence ensures the petition is grounded in a clear factual narrative and helps identify possible objections from beneficiaries or trustees so that those issues can be addressed in advance of filing.
When appropriate, we reach out to trustees and beneficiaries to explore whether a consensual resolution is possible. Early outreach can uncover common ground, limit litigation risk, and sometimes avoid court proceedings altogether. If a consensual path is not available, these communications still provide useful information about likely positions, potential objections, and avenues for negotiating or presenting evidence to the court in the most persuasive manner possible.
Once the decision to proceed is made, we draft the petition and supporting declarations, assemble exhibits, and prepare any proposed orders or settlement documentation. Accurate identification of interested parties and compliance with local filing rules are key to avoiding procedural delays. The filing initiates notice obligations so that beneficiaries may respond. We also coordinate with courts and opposing counsel as needed to set hearings or mediation sessions and to present the strongest possible record in support of the requested modification.
Supporting declarations present the factual evidence necessary to justify the requested modification, such as medical records, correspondence, financial documents, or testimony about the settlor’s intent. Well-crafted declarations explain why the modification is necessary, who will be affected, and how the change should be implemented. These declarations are often decisive in demonstrating to the court that the proposed modification is appropriate under the law and consistent with the settlor’s intentions.
After filing the petition, the court’s clerk issues a case number and scheduling information. Proper service on beneficiaries and other interested parties follows, allowing them to appear or file objections. Initial responses may include stipulations, settlement proposals, or contested pleadings. We monitor deadlines closely, respond to inquiries from the court, and coordinate hearings or settlement efforts to advance the matter toward resolution as efficiently as the circumstances allow.
After a hearing or written consideration, the court may grant, deny, or modify the requested relief, or parties may reach a settlement. If the court approves the modification, we work to ensure the order is properly integrated into revised trust documents and that financial institutions receive updated certifications. Implementation includes updating records, transferring assets if necessary, and documenting the change for future trustees and beneficiaries so that the trust functions smoothly according to the new terms.
When the court issues an order approving a modification, timely execution of updated trust instruments, certification of trust, and notification to banks, brokers, and title companies is necessary for seamless administration. We prepare or review the revised documents and assist in delivering them to institutions that require proof of authority. Ensuring that administrative records match the court’s order reduces the risk of future disputes and facilitates the trustee’s ability to act under the revised terms.
After implementation, ongoing support may include advising trustees on administrative tasks, coordinating distributions, and addressing any follow-up issues that arise. We remain available to assist with questions about the order’s scope, compliance matters, or subsequent adjustments that might be needed. Clear documentation and careful follow-through help preserve the trust’s integrity and ensure beneficiaries receive their intended benefits under the court-approved changes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court asking for a change to the terms of an existing trust or for an interpretation of ambiguous language. It is typically necessary when the trust cannot be amended through provisions within the document itself or when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and the parties cannot resolve the matter informally. The petition outlines the requested modification, presents the factual basis supporting the change, identifies interested parties, and requests that the court issue an order approving the modification under applicable California law. Courts consider whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory grounds for modification, which may include correcting mistakes, clarifying language, or addressing changed circumstances. When all beneficiaries agree, informal solutions may be feasible and avoid the need for a petition. However, when consent is not possible or when significant legal or factual issues exist, a petition provides a binding resolution. Proper preparation of the petition and supporting evidence improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome and helps minimize delays in the process.
Yes, beneficiaries and the trustee can sometimes agree to modify a trust without court involvement if the trust instrument allows amendments or if unanimous written consent is adequate under state law. When all interested parties sign a clear and properly executed written agreement that records the change, that agreement can be used to implement modifications without a petition. Legal review of such agreements is important to ensure they comply with the trust terms and state requirements and to avoid challenges later on. However, when the trust lacks amendment provisions, when the settlor is unavailable to act, or when a beneficiary objects, court involvement may be required to achieve a binding modification. A petition is also advisable when implementing changes that affect third-party institutions or when the law requires judicial approval. Considering the practical needs of asset holders and the potential for future disputes, parties often seek legal guidance before relying solely on informal agreements.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Los Angeles County varies depending on the complexity of the facts, whether parties consent, and the court’s schedule. If beneficiaries agree and the matter is uncontested, the process can be resolved more quickly, often within a few months to allow for drafting, notice, and entry of an order. Contested matters or cases requiring extensive evidence, hearings, or formal discovery typically take longer and may extend six months or more, depending on court availability and procedural requirements. Preparation time before filing should also be considered, as gathering medical records, financial documents, and supporting declarations can require significant effort. Early engagement with counsel and proactive outreach to interested parties often shortens the overall timeline. Courts may also encourage settlement or alternative dispute resolution to resolve petitions more efficiently when possible.
Evidence for a trust modification petition depends on the grounds for modification but commonly includes the original trust instrument and any amendments, medical records if capacity is at issue, correspondence or earlier drafts that reflect the settlor’s intent, and financial records that show changed circumstances. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or others with direct knowledge may provide factual context. Courts are more receptive when the evidentiary record clearly explains why the proposed change reflects the settlor’s wishes or corrects an identifiable mistake. In contested matters, additional documentation such as expert opinions, witness testimony, or formal discovery responses may be necessary. The strength and clarity of supporting evidence can be decisive in persuading the court to grant a modification, particularly when beneficiary objections are raised. Preparing a detailed and well-organized evidentiary record improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A trust modification may have implications for other estate planning documents, depending on how beneficiaries, distributions, or fiduciary powers are changed. For example, changes to beneficiary designations or distribution timing could interact with wills, beneficiary forms on retirement accounts, or powers of attorney. Coordinating updates across related documents helps ensure consistency and prevent unintended consequences during probate or trust administration. It is prudent to review the entire estate plan after a trust modification to confirm that related documents remain aligned with the client’s overall objectives. Updating certifications, successor nominations, and notifying institutions of changes can prevent confusion and ensure that the modified trust functions as intended when assets are transferred or accessed.
Yes, petitions can request removal or replacement of a trustee in certain circumstances, including alleged misconduct, incapacity, inability to perform duties, or breaches of fiduciary duty. The petition must present facts supporting removal and propose a suitable successor or a procedure for selecting one. Courts weigh the trustee’s conduct against fiduciary obligations and the best interests of beneficiaries when considering such requests, and they may order appropriate remedies or oversight measures. Because removal of a trustee is a serious step that can disrupt administration, petitioners often present evidence showing why less drastic measures are insufficient. Alternatives may include court supervision, clarification of powers, or negotiated resignations. Preparing a thorough factual record helps the court assess whether removal or another remedy is warranted and ensures that the transition preserves trust assets and administration.
If a beneficiary objects to a proposed modification, the court will consider the objection and the evidentiary record before deciding whether to grant the petition. Objections may be based on claims that the modification contradicts the settlor’s intent, was procured by undue influence, or would unfairly prejudice the objecting beneficiary. The court evaluates the merits of those claims and the supporting facts presented by both sides before issuing a ruling. Often, objections prompt settlement discussions or mediation to explore compromises that address the concerns of all parties. When settlement is not possible, the court resolves the dispute based on statutory criteria and the evidence. Effective advocacy and a well-documented petition are important to address objections and secure a durable resolution that can be implemented without ongoing litigation.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the changes and the assets involved. Changes to beneficiary designations, distributions, or the structure of ownership may affect estate tax considerations, generation-skipping transfer tax, or income tax treatment of certain assets. Consulting with tax and financial advisors as part of the modification process helps identify and address potential tax consequences and plan modifications that minimize adverse effects. When tax issues are significant, petitions and accompanying planning may be structured to preserve favorable tax treatment while achieving the desired administrative or distributional changes. Coordinating legal changes with tax planning ensures the modification accomplishes goals without creating unintended tax liabilities that could reduce the value passed to beneficiaries.
Not all trust modifications require a court hearing. When beneficiaries and the trustee agree and the trust permits amendment by consent, parties may document the change without a hearing. Even when a petition is filed, courts sometimes grant relief based on written submissions if no party contests the request. The presence of objections or complex factual disputes makes a hearing more likely so the court can evaluate testimony and cross-examination. Local court practices and the specifics of the petition also influence whether a hearing is scheduled. Preparing a thorough written record and engaging in early settlement efforts can reduce the need for an evidentiary hearing, but parties should be prepared to present oral argument if contested issues remain unresolved.
To begin the process in Signal Hill, gather the trust document, any amendments, related estate planning papers, and relevant records that explain the reasons for the requested change. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial review. During the first meeting, we will evaluate whether an informal amendment or beneficiary agreement is feasible or whether a court petition is likely required, and we will outline the necessary documentation and steps. After the initial review, we advise on strategy, prepare any required affidavits and filings, coordinate notice to interested parties, and move forward with either negotiation or court filing as appropriate. Early engagement helps identify potential obstacles, estimate timelines and costs, and set a clear path for achieving a durable modification that aligns with your objectives.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas