A Heggstad petition is often used in California when property that was meant to be held in a trust was never formally transferred into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime. This page explains the reasons families and fiduciaries pursue a Heggstad petition and how the process can help move assets into a trust for orderly administration. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we focus on clear communication and practical steps to help fiduciaries and beneficiaries understand options available under state law, whether a trust exists or further court action is needed to clarify ownership and title issues.
Many families encounter delays or uncertainty when a trustmaker’s assets were not retitled into a trust before incapacity or death. A Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to demonstrate that certain assets were intended to belong to the trust despite lacking formal record changes. This guide sets out how that petition works in Los Angeles County, what documentation is typically required, and how the petition interacts with probate and trust administration. We also discuss timelines, likely outcomes, and how to protect beneficiary interests while minimizing cost and delay for estate settlement.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent lengthy probate proceedings and help enforce the decedent’s or trustmaker’s clear intentions regarding asset distribution. By presenting evidence that certain assets were meant to be held in the trust, the court can order those assets treated as trust property, allowing trust administration to proceed without additional probate. That judicial recognition can protect beneficiaries’ rights, facilitate the efficient management or distribution of property, and reduce the administrative burden on trustees and families. The petition can also help clear title for real property, allowing sales or transfers to occur without further delay.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman advises clients across California on estate planning and trust administration matters, including cases involving Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, thoughtful negotiation with interested parties, and strategic court filings when necessary. We prioritize clear explanations so clients understand options and likely timelines, and we coordinate with fiduciaries, title companies, and other professionals to resolve title and ownership issues efficiently. We handle petitions on behalf of trustees, successor trustees, and beneficiaries while maintaining professional communication with all relevant parties.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that specific assets should be treated as belonging to a trust even though the formal paperwork or title transfers were not completed. This is often necessary when the trustmaker intended certain property to be included in the trust but legal title remained in the individual’s name. The petition supplies evidence such as trust documents, declarations of intent, correspondence, and other records to show that the assets were meant to be part of the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence in deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
The petition process typically requires establishing that the trust existed and identified the property, and that the trustmaker took actions demonstrating an intent to place the asset into the trust. It may involve declaratory relief and a judicial order directing county records or third parties to recognize the trust’s interest. The remedy can be faster and less costly than full probate when supported by convincing documentation. However, the specific procedures and evidentiary thresholds vary by county, so localized knowledge of court practice and filing requirements is important for a successful outcome.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court declaration that a particular asset should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the name of the settlor or decedent. The underlying goal is to align the legal record with the trustmaker’s intent and enable trustees or beneficiaries to manage, sell, transfer, or distribute the asset under the trust terms. Evidence such as trust documents, prior transfers, beneficiary communications, appraisals, and affidavit testimony may all be used to demonstrate the intent and relationship between the asset and the trust. The court’s order formalizes that relationship for purposes of administration.
Successful preparation for a Heggstad petition involves gathering documentary evidence, preparing a clear factual declaration, and identifying all interested parties with potential claims to the asset. The petition must outline the trust’s terms, the asset’s history, and any steps previously taken to transfer title or incorporate the asset into the trust. Notices to beneficiaries and creditors may be required, and coordination with the county recorder or title company is often necessary to implement the court’s order after it is obtained. Working methodically through these steps helps avoid delays and objections.
This section defines common terms that arise in Heggstad petitions and trust administration, including settlor, trustee, successor trustee, beneficiary, title, probate, and declaratory relief. Understanding these terms facilitates clearer communication with fiduciaries, courts, and third parties. Knowing what each role entails and how title differs from beneficial ownership helps trustees take appropriate action to preserve assets and fulfill fiduciary duties. Familiarity with these concepts also makes it easier to assemble the evidence a court may need to recognize trust ownership.
The settlor, also called the trustmaker, is the person who creates and funds a trust. That individual sets out the trust’s terms, names beneficiaries and trustees, and intends for certain assets to be managed or distributed under the trust after incapacity or death. When a Heggstad petition is necessary, the focus is often on the settlor’s intentions and actions regarding specific assets. Demonstrating what the settlor intended and any steps taken toward transferring an asset into the trust forms the core of the documentary record the court will review in evaluating the petition.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets and follow the trust’s terms. A successor trustee steps into that role after the settlor’s incapacity or death. When assets are not formally titled in the trust, the trustee may need to file a petition to have the court recognize that certain property was intended to be trust property. The petition supports the trustee’s authority to manage or distribute the assets consistent with the trust, and to take steps such as transferring title or coordinating with third parties to implement the trust’s provisions.
Title refers to whose name legally appears on public records as the owner of an asset, while beneficial ownership refers to who has the rights to enjoy the asset’s benefits under a trust or agreement. A Heggstad petition seeks to bridge gaps between title and beneficial ownership by showing that the trustmaker intended the trust to have beneficial ownership even if title was not retitled. Demonstrating this disconnect through documentation and testimony helps the court issue an order aligning legal records with the trustmaker’s intent.
Declaratory relief is a court determination that clarifies the rights and legal status of parties regarding an asset or dispute. In the Heggstad context, the petition asks the court to declare that certain property is trust property despite title defects. A court order then provides the legal authority to record changes, direct third parties to recognize the trust, or otherwise resolve title issues. This formal declaration can prevent later disputes and supports efficient trust administration through clear legal recognition of ownership.
When assets were not transferred to a trust, families and fiduciaries often consider several options including probate, an affidavit of death and survivorship, small estate procedures, or a Heggstad petition. Probate can be lengthy and public, while affidavits and streamlined remedies are limited by asset value or type. A Heggstad petition offers a focused court procedure to recognize trust ownership for specific assets, potentially avoiding full probate and preserving privacy. Each option has tradeoffs in time, cost, and evidentiary requirements, so choosing the best route depends on the asset involved and the strength of documentary proof.
Smaller estates or certain types of assets may qualify for simplified procedures that avoid formal probate or a full court hearing. When total estate value falls below statutory thresholds, an affidavit of death or small estate affidavit can transfer personal property without a formal judicial proceeding. Those remedies are often quicker and less costly, but they typically lack the power to resolve title disputes for real property or complex ownership questions. Evaluating whether a limited approach is appropriate requires careful review of asset types, values, and the presence of competing claims.
When title is already clear or when the parties agree on ownership and are willing to execute straightforward transfer deeds or beneficiary forms, a court petition may not be necessary. Mutual agreement among beneficiaries and a cooperating title company can sometimes accomplish record changes quickly. However, if there are uncertainties, missing documentation, or potential objections from heirs or creditors, relying on voluntary transfers may leave parties exposed to future disputes. Assessing whether voluntary action is sufficient depends on the clarity of records and the absence of competing claims.
Title discrepancies that cannot be resolved through voluntary transfers or simple affidavits often require a formal court order to provide lasting clarity. A Heggstad petition provides that clarity by allowing a judge to consider the evidence and declare that the asset belongs to the trust. This judicial recognition can be essential when third parties such as title companies or county recorders require documentation before recording a transfer, or when there are competing claims that threaten to stall administration. A court order reduces future uncertainty and potential litigation over the same asset.
Disagreements among beneficiaries, potential creditor claims, or unclear documentation increase the risk that informal transfers will provoke later disputes. In these circumstances, seeking a court determination through a Heggstad petition can resolve conflicting positions and provide a defensible record for trustees to act upon. The court process allows evidence to be tested and objections to be addressed in a structured way, resulting in a removable cloud on title and enabling the trustee to proceed with administration or disposition of the asset in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Pursuing a formal petition when evidence supports trust ownership creates a permanent judicial record recognizing the trust’s interest in the asset. That recognition assists with title transfers, sales, and distributions, as well as interactions with financial institutions and third parties. A carefully prepared petition also reduces the likelihood of subsequent challenges by providing the court with a clear factual and documentary foundation. While court proceedings require time and resources, the resulting clarity can save time and expense over the long run by preventing future litigation or disputes over the same property.
A comprehensive approach includes thorough evidence gathering, timely notices to interested parties, and strategic coordination with title companies and recorders to implement the court’s order. That coordinated sequence helps ensure that once the judge issues a decision, the administrative steps needed to place the asset under the trust are completed efficiently. This attention to detail benefits trustees and beneficiaries by enabling predictable outcomes and reducing administrative friction, allowing the trustee to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities with a clear legal foundation.
One immediate benefit of a successful petition is the ability to clear title so assets can be sold or transferred under the trust without additional dispute. The court’s declaration gives county recorders and title companies the authority they need to update public records, which often unlocks the ability to close sales or refinance property. That clarity helps fiduciaries act decisively to manage assets, satisfy obligations, and distribute proceeds as the trust provides, reducing administrative delay and improving outcomes for beneficiaries who depend on timely resolution of estate matters.
A court order resolving ownership disputes significantly reduces the chance that the same issues will lead to later litigation. By presenting evidence and receiving a judicial determination, trustees and beneficiaries gain legal finality that discourages subsequent challenges. This enhanced certainty can protect estate assets and reduce both emotional strain and financial cost associated with protracted disputes. For families seeking a dependable path forward, pursuing the appropriate court remedy can provide a stable foundation for administering the trust consistent with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Begin gathering all available trust documents, deeds, bank statements, correspondence, and affidavits that show the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust. Early collection of these materials helps build a firm factual record and reduces the chance that critical evidence will be overlooked or lost. Documentation of prior attempts to transfer title or communications with financial institutions can be especially persuasive. Organizing records in a clear chronological order helps the court and other parties follow the history of the asset and the trustmaker’s intent.
After obtaining a court order, coordinating promptly with county recorders and title companies ensures the order is properly implemented and title is updated without unnecessary delay. Understanding the recorder’s requirements for submitting court documents, deed forms, or affidavits avoids rejections that can stall resolution. A proactive approach includes confirming whether any additional documents are necessary to release liens or satisfy recorder rules. This coordination helps the trustee complete administration tasks and prevents administrative obstacles from prolonging estate settlement.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a trust exists but one or more assets remain titled in the trustmaker’s name, especially when those assets are important to the estate’s administration or require a clear title to be sold, refinanced, or distributed. The petition is appropriate when documentary evidence and other facts support the conclusion that the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust. If informal transfers are impossible or contested, the petition offers a path to a definitive judicial declaration that aligns legal records with the trust’s terms.
Another reason to pursue a formal petition is when third parties, including title companies or financial institutions, will not accept informal explanations and require a court order to change records. A petition is also advisable if there is risk of dispute among heirs or potential creditor claims that could complicate transfers. By seeking judicial confirmation, trustees can act with assurance when managing or distributing assets, which protects beneficiaries and helps accomplish the trustmaker’s documented objectives.
Typical scenarios include real property recorded in the decedent’s name, bank accounts or investment accounts not retitled before death, and assets subject to outdated beneficiary designations. Other circumstances involve administrative oversights where the settlor intended funding of the trust but paperwork was not completed. When these kinds of title issues arise, a Heggstad petition may be the most direct way to convert record ownership into trust ownership and allow the trustee to manage or distribute assets as intended without unnecessary delay or complication.
Real property is a frequent trigger for a Heggstad petition when a deed was never recorded in the name of the trust. Because title companies and buyers rely on recorded deeds, unresolved title can prevent sales, refinances, or transfers. A successful petition typically yields a court order that clarifies trust ownership and authorizes the county recorder to update records. This remedy is particularly useful when there is convincing evidence of the settlor’s intent to include the real property in the trust but administrative steps were omitted during the settlor’s lifetime.
Financial accounts, brokerage accounts, or vehicles that were not retitled into the trust can create obstacles for trustees trying to gather assets for management or distribution. Institutions often require clear proof before transferring ownership, and a Heggstad petition can provide the court-ordered documentation they need. This is especially important when accounts contain significant value or when access to funds is necessary to meet obligations, pay taxes, or distribute assets to beneficiaries according to the trust’s provisions.
When beneficiaries or potential heirs raise competing claims, or when documentation about the settlor’s intent is incomplete, formal judicial involvement can resolve uncertainties. A Heggstad petition allows the court to consider available evidence and weigh competing assertions, producing a binding declaration that clarifies ownership. This judicial process helps prevent repeated litigation over the same issues and provides trustees with the authority to proceed without fear of later successful challenges to their actions in administering trust property.
Residents of South San Gabriel can seek representation to prepare and file a Heggstad petition, manage notices to interested parties, and coordinate with the appropriate court and county recorder. Local knowledge of Los Angeles County filing practices, courtroom procedures, and recorder requirements helps streamline the process. We assist trustees and beneficiaries in assembling evidence, preparing declarations, and obtaining the orders needed to transfer or record trust ownership. Prompt communication, careful document preparation, and practical guidance help families navigate these matters with less stress.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused counsel on trust administration and related court proceedings, including Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that reflect a clear understanding of California trust law and the procedural steps local courts typically require. We strive to prepare persuasive petitions supported by organized documentation and to manage communications with beneficiaries and third parties to minimize disputes. Clients receive straightforward explanations of options and likely timelines so they can make informed decisions during a sensitive time.
We work to coordinate each step of the process, from evidence gathering through court filings and post-order recordation. This includes preparing declarations, coordinating with title companies and county recorders to implement the court’s order, and advising trustees on how to proceed following a judicial determination. Our goal is to reduce administrative delays and help trustees fulfill their responsibilities efficiently while protecting beneficiary interests and preserving the intent reflected in the trust documents.
Clients appreciate timely communication and a pragmatic approach to resolving ownership and title issues. Whether the matter can be resolved through cooperation and voluntary transfers or requires a formal petition, we help identify the most effective and cost-conscious path forward. We assist in weighing alternatives and recommend the route most likely to achieve a lasting resolution that supports the orderly administration of the trust and the settlor’s documented intentions.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents, deeds, account records, and any communications that evidence the settlor’s intent. After identifying interested parties and potential objections, we develop a strategy for filing a petition that provides a clear factual narrative for the court. We prepare declarations and exhibits, manage required notices, and represent the trustee at hearings if needed. Following a favorable order, we coordinate with recorders and title companies to implement changes and advise trustees on next steps to administer and distribute trust assets.
The first step is assembling the documentary proof that supports trust ownership, such as the trust document, deeds, bank records, correspondence, and any prior transfer attempts. We assess the strength of the available evidence and determine which additional attestations or affidavits may be helpful. This assessment shapes the petition’s factual narrative and identifies the parties who must be noticed. Early and careful evidence collection helps ensure the petition is persuasive and minimizes the need for additional follow-up during the court process.
Identifying pertinent records and preserving them in an organized manner is essential to support the petition. That includes locating original trust documents, copies of deeds, account statements, correspondence with financial institutions, and any prior legal filings. Organizing these materials chronologically and including clear explanations for each item helps the court see the progression of events demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent. Prompt preservation reduces the risk of losing critical evidence and strengthens the factual basis for the petition.
We prepare clear declarations from the trustee or other witnesses that describe the settlor’s actions and intent regarding the asset. Documentary exhibits are labeled and referenced in the petition to make the evidentiary showing straightforward for the court. These prepared materials should anticipate potential questions and provide a coherent narrative that ties the documents to the trust’s terms. A well-organized set of declarations and exhibits increases the likelihood of securing a favorable judicial declaration.
Once the petition and supporting evidence are prepared, the next step is filing with the appropriate probate court and providing required notices to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties. Proper notice ensures that all potentially affected people have an opportunity to respond and protects the court’s jurisdictional requirements. We ensure filings comply with local rules, statutory notice periods, and procedural requirements so the petition proceeds without avoidable procedural defects that could delay resolution.
Local courts have specific filing procedures, fees, and form requirements that must be satisfied to proceed smoothly. We verify local practices, prepare required forms, and confirm deposit amounts or bond requirements, if any. Meeting these procedural requirements at the outset prevents unnecessary continuances and rejections. Close attention to local court procedures helps move the petition to a hearing efficiently, reducing time to resolution and enabling trustees to address asset management and distribution once a ruling is obtained.
Serving notice to all interested parties and monitoring any responses is a critical part of the process. We prepare proof of service and track any objections or responses that may require additional briefing or negotiation. If disputes arise, we evaluate options for resolution through stipulation or litigation. Keeping organized records of service and responses helps the court and parties follow the timeline and understand the positions of those affected by the petition, which supports efficient adjudication.
After notice and filing, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition. We present the factual showing through declarations and oral argument as needed, respond to objections, and seek a judicial order clarifying trust ownership. Once an order is obtained, the final phase includes implementing the court’s directives, recording necessary documents with the county recorder, and coordinating with title companies or institutions to effect transfer. Post-order steps ensure the court’s decision produces the intended practical result for trust administration.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition and supporting documents and may hear objections or questions from interested parties. Presenting a clear, well-documented record helps the judge understand the trustmaker’s intent and the factual basis for the requested relief. We advocate for our client’s position while remaining responsive to the court’s inquiries and any issues raised by other parties. A calm, methodical presentation of the record often results in an effective judicial resolution that advances trust administration.
Once the court issues an order, implementing it through proper recording and communication with institutions finalizes the transfer of title into the trust. We coordinate submission of the order and any required conveyance documents to the county recorder and assist with closing steps such as removing clouds on title, satisfying recorder requirements, and advising trustees how to proceed with administration. Timely execution of these tasks ensures that the court’s determination translates into practical control of the asset by the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a court request to recognize certain assets as belonging to a trust even though title was not formally transferred into the trust. It is used when the trustmaker clearly intended to place assets into the trust but administrative transfer steps were not completed, or when title remains in the individual’s name. The petition presents evidence of intent, such as the trust document, declarations, prior deeds, and correspondence, to ask the court for a declaratory order identifying the asset as trust property. Filing a petition becomes appropriate when informal remedies are insufficient, when title companies require a judicial order to change recorded ownership, or when there are potential disputes among heirs or beneficiaries. The petition is a focused remedy that can provide a definitive legal basis for transferring or recording the asset under the trust, helping trustees to manage or distribute property in accordance with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the factual record, the number of interested parties, and local court schedules. In Los Angeles County, straightforward petitions supported by clear documentation and uncontested notices can proceed more quickly than cases with objections or missing evidence. Typical timelines can range from a few months to longer if additional discovery, hearings, or negotiation is needed. Local procedural requirements and the court’s calendar influence how quickly a hearing can be scheduled. Preparing the petition thoroughly and addressing potential objections proactively often shortens the timeline. Gathering complete records, providing proper notice to all interested parties, and coordinating with title companies or recorders to understand post-order requirements can streamline implementation after a court order is obtained. Early organization and clear communication with the court and other parties help reduce avoidable delays.
Most persuasive evidence includes the original or a certified copy of the trust document that names the asset or describes the settlor’s intent, deeds or transfer documents showing prior attempts, contemporaneous correspondence indicating intent to fund the trust, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s actions. Bank and account statements, beneficiary designations, and related paperwork that align with trust terms can also support the petition. A coherent narrative tying these documents together is essential for convincing the court. Affidavits from persons with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions and documentary proof of steps taken toward funding the trust strengthen the petition. When records are incomplete, corroborating testimony and consistent contemporaneous documents become more important. The court weighs the totality of evidence, so organizing materials in a clear and persuasive way is critical to success.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets addressed in the petition when the court determines they belong to the trust. However, it does not retroactively convert all estate assets into trust property for every purpose. Probate may still be needed for assets that are not subject to the trust or where claims require resolution through probate procedures. The petition’s scope is limited to asserting trust ownership for the assets specifically identified and supported by evidence. Choosing the correct remedy depends on the asset type and the overall estate plan. While a Heggstad petition can resolve title issues and prevent probate for specific assets, a comprehensive review of the estate’s inventory is necessary to determine whether probate or other procedures are required for other assets. A careful assessment helps determine the most efficient path to complete estate administration in a way that honors the trustmaker’s documented intent.
Required notice typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestacy rules, and any persons or entities with potential claims against the asset, such as known creditors. Proper service and proof of notice are often prerequisites to proceeding with the petition, and the court may set timeframes for responses or objections. Ensuring comprehensive and correct notice helps protect the petition from procedural challenges and supports the court’s ability to enter a binding order. Notifying interested parties early also allows potential disputes to surface so they can be addressed either through stipulation or in court. Documenting the method and timing of service is important for the court record. In some situations, additional notice procedures such as publication or special service may be required depending on the circumstances and the identities of interested parties.
Yes, a successful Heggstad petition can clear title for real property by obtaining a court order that recognizes the property as trust-owned, which can then be recorded with the county recorder. Title companies typically require such an order before issuing updated title insurance or allowing a sale, refinance, or transfer to proceed. The petition’s effectiveness in clearing title depends on the evidence provided and the court’s willingness to issue a declaratory order aligning recorded ownership with the trust’s terms. Following the order, trustees usually coordinate promptly with recorders and title companies to ensure the judgment is implemented and public records reflect the trust’s ownership. This implementation phase is critical because the court’s ruling alone does not update public records until the necessary recording steps are completed, so timely action after the order is essential to complete sales or other transactions involving the property.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the case, the need for additional evidence or depositions, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested petitions supported by organized documentation and agreement among interested parties typically incur lower attorney and court costs, while contested matters requiring hearings or discovery will increase expenses. Ancillary costs may include fees for obtaining certified documents, appraisals, or record retrieval. Understanding likely costs early helps clients plan and make informed decisions about proceeding. A careful initial assessment to determine the strength of the record and the likelihood of objections can help control costs. Where possible, resolving matters through stipulation or negotiating with interested parties can reduce the need for extensive litigation. Transparent budgeting and clear communication about anticipated steps and associated fees provide clients with realistic expectations about the financial aspects of pursuing a petition.
Trustees can prepare by organizing trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that demonstrates the settlor’s intent to include assets in the trust. Creating a chronological file that ties each document to specific actions or communications can make the petition more persuasive. Trustees should also identify potential interested parties early and prepare notices, and consider obtaining declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Early preparation reduces the risk of missing evidence that could be important to the court. Additionally, trustees should confirm local court requirements and potential recorder procedures to avoid procedural setbacks. Engaging legal counsel early to assess the evidence, identify likely objections, and prepare clear declarations often expedites the process. Trustees who take a proactive, organized approach help ensure the petition is supported by a coherent factual record and move more efficiently through the court process.
If someone objects to the petition, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the objections and evaluate the evidence in greater depth. Objections can raise factual disputes about intent, competing claims, or challenges to the sufficiency of documentation. The court will consider testimony, declarations, and documents from both sides before deciding whether to grant the petition. In some cases, objections can be resolved through negotiation or stipulation without a full hearing, but contested matters may require more extensive proceedings to reach a resolution. When objections arise, having organized evidence and credible witness declarations helps address challenges effectively. The court weighs the credibility and weight of the evidence presented, so responding promptly and thoroughly to objections is important. Counsel can work to narrow disputed issues, propose compromise measures, or present the strongest possible factual record to support the petition and persuade the court to issue a binding declaration.
A Heggstad petition can still be appropriate when some documentation is missing, but the petition’s success depends on the strength of available corroborating evidence. Where original documents are unavailable, testimony from individuals with direct knowledge, contemporaneous correspondence, and consistent account records can help fill gaps. The court assesses the totality of the evidence, so a thoughtful presentation that explains why certain documents are missing and provides alternative proof can persuade the judge to grant relief when the overall record supports trust ownership. When documentation is incomplete, careful preparation and honesty about evidentiary gaps are essential. Supplementing the record with affidavits, reconstructions of transactions, or related documents that show intent can be persuasive. Consulting early with counsel to evaluate the feasibility of obtaining corroborating materials and to craft a persuasive factual narrative increases the likelihood of achieving a favorable outcome despite missing paperwork.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas