A Heggstad petition can be an important procedural step when assets transferred to a trust are not recorded in the trust’s name but should be treated as trust property. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition functions in California probate and trust administration, who may file, and what outcomes to expect. If you are a trustee, beneficiary, or heir facing questions about asset ownership after a trustmaker’s death, understanding this petition can help clarify title transfer and reduce confusion during distribution. The goal is to resolve title issues and align legal record with the trustmaker’s intentions so property can be managed or distributed according to the trust document.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist people in San Jose and across California with trust-related matters including petitions to quiet title and confirm trust ownership. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that property transferred outside of probate is effectively owned by the trust despite imperfections in the recorded title. This is commonly used for assets that were intended to be in the trust but remained titled in an individual’s name. Readers will learn when filing is appropriate, what evidence is needed to support a petition, and how the petition fits into the broader estate planning and trust administration process so that property can be properly handled for beneficiaries.
A successful Heggstad petition provides a clear legal pathway to have property recognized as trust property without full probate proceedings. This can save time and expense, facilitate title transfers, and prevent disputes among beneficiaries or third parties. Courts consider intent and surrounding evidence to determine whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be governed by the trust, and a Heggstad petition presents that evidence formally. For trustees, beneficiaries, and successors, the petition can remove clouds on title, enable sale or transfer of real estate, and allow trust assets to be administered in accordance with the trust instrument rather than probate law. It is a useful tool to ensure the trustmaker’s directions are honored.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clients across California with representation in trust and estate matters, including Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related filings such as trust modification and pour-over wills. Our team brings extensive experience handling title disputes and coordinating with trustees, beneficiaries, and county recording offices to correct ownership records. We focus on clear communication, careful document review, and practical solutions that align with the trustmaker’s intended distributions. When matters involve sensitive family dynamics or complex asset ownership issues, we pursue strategies designed to resolve disputes efficiently and protect client interests while navigating California procedural requirements.
A Heggstad petition is a petition to the probate court seeking recognition that an asset belongs to a trust despite the asset’s recorded title not reflecting the trust’s ownership. California courts will examine the circumstances, including trust documents, transfer instruments, and contemporaneous acts by the trustmaker, to determine intent. This type of petition is often used as a remedy when forms of transfer were incomplete, deeds were not recorded, or other administrative oversights left property titled in the deceased’s name. Filing a petition clarifies ownership, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the property in accordance with the trust and avoiding delays that could impede administration.
The evidence needed typically includes the trust instrument, any conveyance documents, declarations of intent, and proof of the trustmaker’s actions consistent with transferring property into the trust. Courts look to whether the trustmaker treated the asset as trust property during their lifetime and whether there was a clear intention to include the asset in the trust. A petition may also be used in conjunction with other filings, such as trust certification or petitions to modify the trust record. Understanding procedural timelines and notice requirements is essential to avoid contested outcomes and to complete administration smoothly.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request asking the court to deem property to be trust property despite imperfect title records. Originating from California case law, the petition provides a method to align recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s expressed intent so trustees can exercise their powers. The court reviews documentary evidence and factual circumstances to conclude whether property should be controlled by the trust. This remedy is particularly useful when assets were intended to pass via trust rather than probate but administrative errors, missing paperwork, or failure to retitle assets have left ownership unclear. The petition promotes orderly distribution consistent with the trust.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts weigh several factors, including the trust document itself, proof of the trustmaker’s intent, actions taken to transfer assets into the trust, and any written instruments suggesting the trust should control ownership. The process typically begins with a petition filed in probate court, followed by service of notice to interested parties, and presentation of evidence at a hearing. Counsel may gather deeds, trust certifications, bank records, and declarations from witnesses to support the claim. Successful petitions often require clear, consistent documentation and persuasive factual narratives showing the asset was meant to be part of the trust.
This glossary covers common terms encountered when pursuing a Heggstad petition, such as trust certification, beneficiary, quiet title, and probate court procedures. Familiarity with these terms helps trustees and beneficiaries understand filings, evidence standards, and the roles of various parties. Knowing the difference between an asset being in a trust versus subject to probate is central to grasping why a petition may be necessary. Properly labeling documents and assembling clear proof of intent and transfer activity can make the difference between a routine petition and a contested proceeding.
A Heggstad petition is a formal request to a probate court to recognize that an asset belongs to a trust despite the recorded title indicating otherwise. The petition is supported by evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent and any steps taken to transfer the asset into the trust. Courts rely on both documents and behavior indicating ownership was intended to shift to the trust. The remedy enables trustees to manage, sell, or distribute the asset according to the trust instrument, avoiding unnecessary probate delay and aligning legal title with the settlor’s instructions.
A trust certification is a document that summarizes essential information from a trust, such as the trustee’s name and powers, without disclosing private terms. It provides third parties like title companies or banks the documentation needed to recognize the trustee’s authority to act on behalf of the trust. In Heggstad matters, a trust certification can support a petition by establishing the trustee’s role and the trust’s existence while preserving confidentiality of the trust’s full content. It is often used alongside deeds and declarations to clarify ownership for transactions and court purposes.
Quiet title describes a court procedure to resolve competing claims to real property and remove clouds on title. While Heggstad petitions specifically address ownership in the context of trusts, quiet title actions can be a related remedy when third parties assert competing rights. A quiet title process clarifies who holds legal title and can eliminate encumbrances or claim disputes. In trust administration, combining a Heggstad petition with quiet title relief may be necessary to secure a fully marketable title for sale or transfer of real property.
Beneficiary rights refer to the legal and equitable interests that individuals or entities hold under a trust. Beneficiaries are entitled to information about trust administration, notification of proceedings, and distributions according to the trust’s terms. When a Heggstad petition is filed, beneficiaries may have notice rights and opportunities to contest the petition if they believe the property should not be treated as trust property. Understanding beneficiary rights ensures that trustees fulfill fiduciary duties and that interested parties have the chance to protect their interests in the administration process.
When addressing assets with defective or missing trust transfer records, several paths exist including Heggstad petitions, formal probate, or other probate-court filings such as petitions to determine title. A Heggstad petition specifically seeks court recognition that assets are trust property and can be quicker and less costly than full probate if successful. Probate may be necessary when there is no valid trust or when the trustmaker’s intent cannot be established. Alternative filings like quiet title actions or petitions for instructions can also resolve disputes. Choosing the appropriate route depends on the strength of evidence, the number of interested parties, and the nature of the asset at issue.
A limited approach such as filing a Heggstad petition is often appropriate when there is clear documentary evidence that the trustmaker intended the asset to belong to the trust. Examples include an unambiguous trust instrument, deeds prepared for transfer, or contemporaneous statements and bank records showing trust funding efforts. In those circumstances, courts are more likely to accept a petition confirming trust ownership rather than initiating full probate. Pursuing a focused petition can reduce time and costs, particularly when there is broad agreement among interested parties about the trustmaker’s intentions.
When beneficiaries, trustees, and potential heirs are largely in agreement about the trust’s terms and the intended treatment of specific assets, a limited petition can resolve title issues without escalated litigation. Courts prefer efficient resolutions where disputes are minimal and evidence supports the trustmaker’s intent. Filing a narrowly tailored petition can preserve relationships and limit costs by avoiding broad contested probate proceedings. Communication among parties and voluntary disclosure of documents can make a focused petition an efficient and practical choice to align recorded title with trust administration objectives.
A more comprehensive approach may be necessary when assets are entwined with complex titles, multiple heirs contest ownership, or when the record contains liens, mortgages, or competing claims. In such cases, combining a Heggstad petition with additional filings, title company coordination, and potential settlement negotiations can be required to secure clear legal ownership. Addressing each encumbrance methodically, preparing robust evidence, and coordinating with all stakeholders helps resolve multifaceted disputes and reduces the risk of future challenges to the property’s disposition under the trust.
When beneficiaries or potential heirs contest whether the asset belongs to the trust, or when the trustmaker’s intent is ambiguous due to inconsistent documentation, a comprehensive strategy is often required. This may involve litigation, witness declarations, forensic review of records, and careful motion practice to establish the trustmaker’s intent and secure court orders. Preparing for potential contests and preserving evidence, while seeking negotiated resolutions where possible, helps protect client interests and moves the process toward a final determination that allows administration to continue.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title issues provides several benefits including stronger documentation, reduced risk of later challenges, and a clearer path to distributing or selling assets. By addressing all potential claims, coordinating with title companies and recording offices, and preparing thorough legal filings, trustees and beneficiaries increase the likelihood of obtaining court recognition of trust ownership. This approach supports stable administration, protects beneficiary rights, and helps ensure that the trustmaker’s intentions are honored while minimizing the chance of reopening disputes in the future.
Comprehensive handling also improves negotiation leverage and may facilitate settlements that avoid prolonged litigation. Properly documenting chain of title, collecting witness statements, and presenting a consistent narrative to the court can prevent procedural delays. For real property and sensitive assets, resolving title issues thoroughly helps preserve marketability and streamlines transactions like sales or refinances. Taking the time to address related matters such as trust certifications, deeds, and beneficiary notices results in efficient administration and a lower chance of post-judgment complications.
Thorough documentation and court findings reduce the possibility that competing claimants will successfully challenge the property’s treatment as trust property later on. A comprehensive petition that establishes intent and produces clear judicial determinations creates a more stable title record. This can be especially important for real estate and other valuable assets where lenders, buyers, or heirs may later scrutinize ownership. By addressing potential weaknesses up front and securing formal court recognition, trustees and beneficiaries protect the trust estate and help ensure smoother transactions down the road.
When title issues are resolved comprehensively, trustees can proceed with administration tasks such as selling property, distributing proceeds, or refinancing with greater confidence. Clearing title of ambiguities and obtaining necessary court orders makes assets more marketable and assists in obtaining cooperation from banks and title companies. This readiness reduces delays, lowers transactional friction, and enables trustees to fulfill fiduciary duties efficiently. A complete approach supports timely distributions and finalizes estate matters in a way that aligns with the trust’s terms.
Gathering complete documentation at the outset makes a petition more persuasive and can shorten court proceedings. Useful items include the trust instrument, deeds, bank records showing transfers, signed transfer documents, and any correspondence indicating the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from witnesses who observed the trustmaker’s actions can also be important. Document organization and clear chains of custody for evidence help the court understand the factual narrative, reduce challenges, and support efficient resolution so trustees can proceed with administration without undue delay.
Contacting title companies and county recording offices early helps identify exactly what documents are missing or defective. Title professionals can indicate what will be required to obtain marketable title following a successful petition, and clarity about recording procedures prevents further delays. Working with these entities during preparation for a petition ensures that required deeds or certifications will be properly recorded after the court issues an order. This coordination reduces surprises and helps trustees complete necessary steps promptly once the court has ruled.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended to be in a trust are not reflected as such in public records and simple administrative corrections are insufficient. Typical scenarios include deeds not recorded properly, bank accounts still in the deceased’s name, or real property that was to be transferred into the trust but never retitled. A petition can align title records with the trustmaker’s stated intent and allow trustees to manage those assets as part of the trust estate. Timing, evidence, and the presence of interested parties all influence whether the petition is an appropriate remedy.
You may also consider this service if there is uncertainty about how to proceed with sales, refinances, or distributions involving property with defective title. Petitioning the court can provide a definitive legal determination that eases negotiations with buyers or lenders and helps trustees meet fiduciary responsibilities. When family members are uncertain or disputes loom, addressing title issues formally through the probate court can prevent future litigation, protect beneficiary interests, and ensure the trustmaker’s estate plan is carried out according to their documented wishes.
Common circumstances include unrecorded deeds, failure to retitle real property, bank accounts left in the deceased’s name, or assets that were intended to pass through a trust but remained in the trustmaker’s personal name at death. Other situations arise when a third party contests trust ownership or when the county record does not reflect a transfer that the trustmaker clearly intended. Identifying these issues early and assessing evidence of intent helps determine whether a petition is likely to succeed and is the most efficient method to resolve title uncertainty.
A deed prepared to transfer property into a trust may not have been recorded before the trustmaker’s death, leaving title in the individual’s name. In that case, a Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that the deed, related transfer documents, or the trustmaker’s actions demonstrate the intent to place the property in the trust. Securing a court determination facilitates recording corrective documents and enables the trustee to act on the property as trust property for sale, refinance, or distribution according to the trust’s terms.
Accounts intended to be trust property but left in the trustmaker’s individual name can create delays in administration and access to funds. When account institutions require a court order to recognize the trustee’s authority, a Heggstad petition can provide the legal basis for institutional cooperation. The petition can present bank statements, beneficiary designations, and other documentation showing that the accounts were meant to fund the trust, allowing trustees to manage accounts appropriately and use funds for trust obligations or distributions.
When heirs or other parties assert competing claims to property, or when trust documents and surrounding actions appear inconsistent, a Heggstad petition can bring the issue before the court for resolution. Presenting coherent evidence regarding the trustmaker’s intent helps the court weigh competing narratives and determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. This process offers a structured method for resolving disputes and provides judicial findings that support trustees in carrying out their duties and beneficiaries in receiving appropriate distributions.
Residents of Temple City and Los Angeles County who face title uncertainties after a trustmaker’s death can seek assistance to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We provide counsel on evidence collection, drafting petition documents, and navigating probate court procedures so that trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with administration. Whether the matter involves a single piece of property or multiple assets across county lines, timely assessment and well-prepared filings help avoid unnecessary delays and ensure the trust’s instructions are followed in a way consistent with California rules and local court practices.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a longstanding practice assisting clients with trust administration matters including Heggstad petitions, trust certifications, and related filings. We focus on practical solutions that protect beneficiary interests and support trustees in fulfilling duties. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review, careful preparation, and clear communication with clients and other parties involved in the administration. Clients benefit from a dedicated process for collecting evidence, preparing petitions, and guiding matters through probate court to achieve recognition of trust ownership when appropriate.
We counsel clients on the range of options available when title is defective and recommend efficient paths that align with the trustmaker’s intent. Whether resolving unrecorded deeds, clarifying account ownership, or pursuing court recognition of trust property, our team assists with notice requirements, court filings, and post-judgment recording needs. We work to minimize disruption for families, reduce administrative delay, and pursue resolutions that enable trustees to administer assets as intended by the trustmaker, while keeping clients informed at every step of the process.
Our office represents trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties across California and coordinates with local title companies and county offices to ensure that court orders can be implemented effectively. We prepare the documentation and evidence necessary to present a persuasive petition, and we assist with follow-up actions such as recording deeds, obtaining trust certifications, and addressing any ancillary matters that may arise. This comprehensive support aims to streamline trust administration and provide clients with clear pathways to resolve title defects.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust instrument, related conveyance documents, and records to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We identify interested parties, assess evidence of the trustmaker’s intent, and recommend documentation to gather, such as deeds, bank records, and witness declarations. Once prepared, we file the petition, manage required notices under California law, and represent clients at hearings. After court approval, we coordinate recording of instruments and title company follow-up so the trustee can administer assets in accordance with the court order and the trust terms.
The initial phase involves collecting and reviewing all relevant documents to build the factual record supporting trust ownership. We examine the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, previous communications, and any prepared but unrecorded conveyances. Declarations from individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s intent may be requested, and we identify any potential obstacles such as liens or conflicting claims. A detailed review helps determine whether a petition is likely to succeed and establishes the evidence plan for filing, serving notice, and presenting the matter to the court.
We assist clients in assembling the necessary documentation and conducting an investigation into the history of the asset’s ownership. This includes locating deeds, transfer instruments, account records, and correspondence that indicate the trustmaker’s intent. We also help gather witness statements and other supporting materials that demonstrate consistent treatment of the asset as trust property. A careful, organized compilation of evidence increases the chance of a favorable court ruling and helps address potential challenges from interested parties.
Before filing, we consult with the trustee and interested parties to explain options and potential outcomes. We discuss notice requirements, possible objections, and alternative dispute resolution opportunities. Developing a clear strategy ensures that the petition is tailored to the facts and that the client understands realistic timelines and next steps. This stage is also an opportunity to attempt cooperative resolutions where feasible, reducing the need for contested litigation and streamlining the path to court recognition when all parties agree on the trustmaker’s intent.
After gathering evidence and preparing the petition, we file with the appropriate probate court and ensure all statutory notice requirements are met. Notice is provided to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties so they may respond or object. Proper service is important to preserve the court’s authority to decide the matter. During this phase, we monitor any responses and prepare supplemental declarations or exhibits as necessary to address factual disputes and to present a coherent case for why the asset should be recognized as trust property.
The filing must comply with local court rules and California probate procedures, including the correct forms, supporting exhibits, and proofs of service. We prepare tailored pleadings that present the factual basis for trust ownership and attach the trust instrument and other documentary evidence. Careful attention to procedural details reduces the chance of delays or dismissal and ensures the petition advances to a court hearing where the factual record can be considered and resolved.
We arrange for proper service of the petition on all required parties and track any objections or responses. If objections arise, we evaluate whether negotiation or additional evidence might resolve disputes prior to hearing. In contested matters we prepare responsive pleadings and declarations to address opposing claims. Managing service and responses promptly and accurately preserves client rights and positions the case for a productive hearing or settlement discussions that can resolve competing claims without protracted litigation.
At the hearing, the court evaluates the submitted evidence and any objections before deciding whether to recognize the property as trust property. If the petition is granted, we assist with drafting and recording any required documents, such as corrected deeds or certificates, and coordinate with title companies to clear the record. Post-judgment steps often include filing the court order with the county recorder and notifying relevant institutions to reflect the trust’s ownership, enabling trustees to complete sales, distributions, or refinancing as directed by the trust.
During the hearing, we present documentary evidence and sworn declarations that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and actions consistent with placing the asset in the trust. The court reviews this evidence and any objections from interested parties before making findings and issuing an order. The order typically states whether the property is to be treated as trust property and authorizes necessary steps to correct public records. Achieving a clear court determination provides legal certainty for trustees and beneficiaries going forward.
After securing a court order, we handle post-judgment recording to effectuate the change of title and provide necessary documents to title companies and financial institutions. This may involve recording corrective deeds, presenting the court order to banks, and completing trust certification procedures. Ensuring that the court’s decision is properly reflected in county records and with relevant entities is essential to completing administration and enabling transactions such as sales or distributions without further title encumbrances.
A Heggstad petition requests that the probate court recognize property as belonging to a trust despite imperfections in public records. It is appropriate when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to be part of the trust but the recorded title does not reflect that intent. The petition presents documentary evidence and testimony to show the trustmaker’s actions and intent, enabling the trustee to manage or distribute the asset as part of the trust once the court issues an order. This process is often used instead of full probate when evidence is sufficient and interested parties are cooperative. It addresses a narrow issue of ownership recognition rather than distributing the entire estate, and it can be a more direct and cost-effective path when title irregularities are administrative rather than substantive disputes.
Timing varies depending on local court calendars, the need for additional evidence, and whether interested parties raise objections. In uncontested situations with well-organized documentation, a petition can move relatively quickly through initial filing and a hearing, often in a matter of weeks to a few months. When disputes arise or supplemental evidence is required, the process can extend longer as parties prepare responsive pleadings and the court schedules additional hearings. Preparing the petition with complete supporting exhibits and complying strictly with notice requirements reduces delays. Working proactively to resolve objections through communication or mediation can also shorten the timeline by avoiding extended litigation and allowing the court to rule based on a clear factual record.
Key evidence includes the trust instrument, deeds or documents indicating intent to transfer, account records, correspondence, and declarations from witnesses who observed the trustmaker’s actions. The court looks for consistency between the trustmaker’s stated intentions and documented acts that demonstrate funding of the trust. Documentary evidence that predates or contemporaneous to the trustmaker’s actions carries weight in establishing the intended treatment of assets. Additional helpful items can include unrecorded conveyances, settlement statements, and any communications with banks or title companies showing attempts to transfer assets into the trust. A clear and organized presentation of these materials makes the petition more persuasive and helps the court determine whether to recognize the asset as trust property.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may contest a Heggstad petition. The court provides notice to those entitled to receive it so they can object if they believe the property should not be treated as trust property. Common grounds for contest include assertions that the trustmaker lacked intent to transfer the asset or that competing claims exist on the property, such as liens or prior conveyances. If an objection is filed, the court will consider competing evidence and may schedule additional hearings. In many contested cases, parties attempt to negotiate or mediate before trial to reach an agreement that resolves title issues without protracted litigation. Presenting robust evidence and responding to objections promptly helps protect the petitioner’s position.
Not necessarily. A Heggstad petition seeks a focused determination of ownership, which can be an alternative to full probate when the trustmaker’s intentions are clear and evidence supports recognition of trust ownership. Probate becomes necessary if there is no valid trust, if the trustmaker’s intent cannot be established, or if broad estate distribution issues must be resolved under probate law. Choosing between a petition and probate depends on the specific facts, available evidence, and the parties involved. When practical, seeking a petition can preserve efficiency and reduce the expense and publicity associated with probate by resolving narrower title issues in the probate court context.
Title companies and lenders typically require clear, marketable title before completing transactions. A court order recognizing an asset as trust property can satisfy title companies and lenders by removing uncertainty about ownership. After obtaining an order, the trustee and counsel usually coordinate to record any corrective deeds and present the court order and trust certification to the title company to facilitate closing or financing. Early coordination with title professionals helps identify what evidence or recorded instruments will be necessary following the court order. Preparing in advance for the recording process reduces friction and ensures that the asset becomes marketable or acceptable to lenders once judicial recognition of trust ownership is obtained.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the matter, whether the petition is contested, and local court fees. Typical expenses include filing fees, service fees, costs for obtaining records and certified copies, and attorney fees for preparing and prosecuting the petition. Contested matters will generally incur higher costs due to additional pleadings, hearings, and potential discovery. Investing in thorough preparation and organization of evidence may reduce total expense by minimizing contested issues. Discussing budget expectations and potential cost-saving measures early in the process helps clients plan and pursue the most efficient path to resolve title defects and complete trust administration.
A Heggstad petition can address a variety of asset types, including real estate, bank accounts, and investment accounts when those assets were intended to be part of the trust but remain in the deceased’s name. For accounts, the petition may be supported by records showing attempts to retitle, beneficiary designations, or other indications that the account was meant to fund the trust. Different institutions have varying procedures for recognizing trust authority, and a court order often resolves institutional concerns. Real property matters frequently require recorded corrective deeds after the court issues an order, while accounts might require presenting the court order and trust certification to the financial institution. Each asset type has procedural considerations, so tailoring the petition and follow-up actions is important.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the petitioner may need to consider alternative remedies, such as pursuing a quiet title action, initiating probate proceedings, or gathering additional evidence to support a renewed request. A denial generally indicates that the facts presented did not sufficiently demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent or that competing claims created reasonable doubt about ownership. Following a denial, parties should evaluate the court’s reasoning and explore options for appeal, settlement, or supplemental filings if appropriate. Addressing gaps in the factual record and coordinating negotiations among interested parties can lead to alternative resolutions that secure clear title and permit trust administration to proceed.
Begin by gathering the trust instrument, any deeds, account statements, correspondence, and evidence of the trustmaker’s actions that demonstrate intent to fund the trust. Collect records of meetings with title companies or banks, draft deeds, or other materials that indicate a transfer was contemplated. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent are also helpful. Organizing these documents chronologically and creating a clear summary of events will aid counsel in preparing a persuasive petition. Additionally, identify all potential interested parties and provide accurate contact information for service. Early coordination with title professionals and banks helps reveal what records are missing and what post-order recordings will be necessary, allowing you to prepare for a smooth resolution once the court acts.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas