A trust modification petition can be the right path when changes to a trust are needed due to altered family circumstances, tax considerations, or changes in law. If you are in Temple City or elsewhere in Los Angeles County and must modify an existing trust, this guide explains when a petition is required, what the court considers, and how the process typically unfolds. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with clear planning and representation so their intentions for loved ones and assets are honored and updated according to current needs and legal standards.
Navigating trust modification involves both legal procedure and thoughtful planning to ensure that trustee powers, beneficiary designations, and asset distributions align with your current goals. Whether the trust needs a technical correction, a change to adapt to new family dynamics, or an update to reflect tax or retirement considerations, a petition may be necessary to make those changes valid and enforceable. Our approach is to review the trust document thoroughly, explain options in plain language, and pursue the petition process efficiently to minimize stress and protect your family’s future.
Filing a trust modification petition helps ensure that a trust continues to reflect the grantor’s current intentions and the family’s evolving needs. Benefits include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous terms, updating beneficiaries or trustee powers, and addressing changed circumstances like remarriage, divorce, or disability. Bringing modifications before a court can also provide clear legal authority for the changes, reducing the risk of later disputes. The result is a trust document that functions as intended, protects assets, and provides peace of mind to trustees and beneficiaries as circumstances change over time.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with practical estate planning and trust services designed to protect families and assets. Our firm focuses on comprehensive planning documents such as revocable living trusts, wills, advance directives, and various trust forms to meet diverse needs. We guide clients through trust administration and modification petitions when changes are needed. We emphasize clear communication, careful document review, and strategic representation to achieve outcomes that reflect client intentions while addressing legal requirements and procedural steps in probate and trust court.
A trust modification petition asks a court to approve alterations to an existing trust document when the original terms no longer reflect the grantor’s wishes or present interpretive issues. Typical grounds include mistakes in drafting, changes in family structure, correction of ambiguous language, or changes required by tax or property law. The petition outlines proposed amendments, the reasons they are necessary, and any supporting evidence. Courts will consider the grantor’s intent, the nature of the requested changes, and whether beneficiaries or other interested parties are affected before ruling on the petition.
Not every change requires a court petition; some trusts include amendment provisions that allow the grantor or trustee to make certain updates without court involvement. However, where formal judicial approval is needed—such as when beneficiaries object, the trust lacks clear amendment language, or the change involves a fundamental alteration of the trust—filing a petition is the appropriate procedure. The petition process includes notice to interested parties, submission of legal motion papers, and potentially a hearing, where the court evaluates whether approving the change aligns with the trust’s purposes and legal standards.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate or superior court asking for approval to change the terms of a trust. It describes the current trust provisions, the proposed changes, and the factual and legal basis for the modification. The petition can seek to correct mistakes, update trustee authorities, modify beneficiary designations, or clarify language that has led to uncertainty. The court’s role is to ensure the modification is consistent with the grantor’s intent, does not harm protected beneficiaries unnecessarily, and complies with statutory requirements before issuing an order that implements the changes.
Preparing a trust modification petition involves careful document review, gathering supporting evidence, drafting clear proposed amendments, and identifying interested parties for notice. The filing typically includes a petition form, declarations or affidavits explaining the reasons for the change, a proposed order for the judge, and a copy of the trust with highlighted modifications. Once filed, the court schedules review and may hold a hearing if objections arise. The court evaluates whether the modification is proper under trust law, whether notice requirements were met, and whether the modification serves the trust’s purpose and protects beneficiaries.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification proceedings helps clients follow the process and participate meaningfully in decisions. This glossary covers basic concepts such as grantor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, decanting, and petition. It explains how notice is provided to interested parties, what evidence supports a modification, and how court orders formalize changes. Familiarity with these terms helps reduce confusion and ensures you can evaluate proposed revisions with clarity when planning trust modifications or responding to petitions filed by others.
The grantor is the person who originally created the trust and transferred assets into it. The grantor’s intent, as expressed in the trust document and supporting evidence, is central to any modification petition because courts seek to honor those original intentions when considering changes. When the grantor is alive and retains amendment powers, modifications may be made without court involvement if the trust permits. If the grantor is deceased or incapacitated, a petition may be needed to address unforeseen circumstances or correct errors in the original trust document.
Beneficiary rights refer to the legal interests and entitlements of individuals or entities designated to receive benefits from the trust. When a modification petition is filed, beneficiaries must often be notified so they can object or consent. Courts weigh beneficiary rights closely, especially when modifications alter distributions or the timing of benefits. Protecting those rights involves clear notice, transparency about the proposed changes, and legal arguments that the modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and does not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries who have enforceable interests under the trust.
The trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust’s terms and for acting in the beneficiaries’ interests. Trustees play a key role in the modification process when their powers or duties need clarification or expansion. A trustee may petition the court to approve changes that enable better administration, to resolve ambiguities, or to address impractical provisions. Courts evaluate trustee petitions to ensure proposed changes serve the trust’s objectives and that any adjustments protect the beneficiaries and follow legal standards for fiduciary conduct.
Notice and hearing are procedural safeguards that ensure interested parties learn about a proposed trust modification and have an opportunity to respond. Notice typically involves sending legal documents to beneficiaries, potential heirs, and other interested persons. If objections arise, the court may schedule a hearing where parties present evidence and arguments. This process aims to provide fairness and transparency, allowing the court to consider the perspectives of all affected parties before approving any substantive change to the trust’s terms.
There are several legal routes to adjust a trust, including informal amendments under the trust’s amendment clause, decanting assets into a new trust, or filing a trust modification petition with the court. Informal amendments are often quicker when the grantor is alive and retains amendment power. Decanting may transfer assets to a trust with different terms when permitted by law. A petition is the formal option when court approval is needed due to death, incapacity, beneficiary objections, or lack of clear amendment authority. Each option carries different procedural steps, timelines, and risks that should be evaluated carefully.
When the grantor is alive and the trust includes clear language permitting amendments, a limited approach can be effective. The grantor may sign an amendment or restatement that updates terms without court involvement. This method is often faster and less costly than filing a petition, and it preserves privacy by keeping changes out of the public record. It works well for routine updates like changing trustees, adjusting distributions, or adding new assets when there is no dispute among beneficiaries and the trust’s amendment procedures are followed precisely.
If all beneficiaries have full legal capacity and agree to the proposed changes, many jurisdictions allow a private agreement or settlement to modify a trust without formal court proceedings. This approach requires documented consent from all parties and careful drafting to ensure the change is legally effective and binding. When beneficiaries unanimously consent, the process can be efficient, but it is important to memorialize the agreement properly to prevent future disputes. Legal counsel can help draft an enforceable amendment or settlement that reflects the consensus and protects everyone’s interests.
When the original grantor is incapacitated or has passed away, informal amendment options are often unavailable, and a petition becomes necessary to adjust the trust. A court petition allows a judge to consider evidence regarding the grantor’s intent, correct errors, and authorize changes that are in the trust’s best interest. The formal process provides transparency to beneficiaries and creates a clear legal record of the modification, which can prevent future disputes and ensure that the trustee has proper authority to administer the trust according to updated terms.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes or when trust language is ambiguous, a trust modification petition provides a structured legal forum to resolve disputes and obtain a binding court ruling. Courts examine the trust document, the grantor’s intent, and relevant evidence to determine whether a modification is appropriate. Filing a petition helps address conflicting interpretations and provides legal clarity that informal measures cannot. This ensures the trust can be administered consistently and reduces the likelihood of prolonged litigation after changes are implemented.
A court-approved modification provides certainty and enforceability by producing an official order that memorializes the change. This reduces the risk of later challenges and gives trustees clear authority to follow revised terms. Formal proceedings also ensure proper notice to affected parties and allow a judge to balance competing interests when necessary. For families with complex situations, contested beneficiary claims, or significant assets, court approval helps create a durable solution that stands up to scrutiny and helps avoid ambiguity during trust administration.
Another benefit of pursuing a formal modification is that it creates a transparent record explaining why the change was made, which can be important for tax reporting, creditor matters, or family disputes. The court’s involvement can facilitate settlements and structured resolutions that reflect the trust’s purpose while protecting vulnerable beneficiaries. Overall, a comprehensive approach is often the best path where clarity, enforceability, and long-term stability of the trust’s terms are priorities for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Obtaining a court order for a trust modification gives legal certainty to trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties such as banks and title companies. That formal approval minimizes disputes over authority and helps trustees act confidently when managing or distributing trust assets. For beneficiaries, court confirmation reduces ambiguity about entitlements and timing. This kind of enforceable ruling is particularly valuable when the change affects significant assets, complex distribution plans, or issues where potential conflicts could otherwise lead to costly litigation and administrative delays.
A formal modification process includes notice and a review that helps safeguard the interests of vulnerable beneficiaries such as minors, individuals with disabilities, or those with limited capacity. Courts can evaluate whether the proposed changes protect these beneficiaries and may require additional safeguards, such as the appointment of a guardian ad litem or representation for protected parties. This oversight reduces the risk that changes will unintentionally harm those who rely on trust distributions for support and ensures that any modifications align with legal duties to protect beneficiary welfare.
Begin by closely reviewing the original trust document to identify amendment clauses, trustee powers, and any language that might limit changes. Understanding the trust’s explicit amendment procedure helps determine whether a court petition is necessary or if the grantor can make changes directly. It is also important to check for provisions that govern notice to beneficiaries and to locate any related documents such as wills or powers of attorney that might affect overall planning. A careful document review minimizes surprises and helps shape a clear path forward for modifications.
Open communication with beneficiaries, trustees, and potential heirs can prevent misunderstandings and may lead to consensual solutions that avoid court proceedings. When parties understand the reasons for a proposed change and its benefits, they may be more willing to agree or at least narrow their objections. If disagreements persist, prompt notice and documentation preserves legal rights and allows the court to consider all viewpoints. Thoughtful communication often reduces emotional strain and helps achieve practical resolutions that align with family goals.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust no longer reflects your intentions or when circumstances such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or changes in tax law make the original terms impractical. Modifications can resolve drafting errors, clarify administrative powers for trustees, or adjust beneficiary designations to match current relationships and needs. A petition is also appropriate when the grantor lacks formal authority to amend the trust or when beneficiaries disagree and court approval is necessary to implement a fair, enforceable solution that honors the trust’s purpose and protects interests.
Other reasons to pursue a petition include updating distribution timing to provide for dependents, changing trustee appointment or powers to ensure proper management, and addressing unforeseen issues such as property sold or moved into new accounts. A petition helps create a clear legal path to change while ensuring notice and review by the court. This formal approach is often the most reliable way to create binding changes that third parties and institutions will accept during trust administration and when transferring assets.
Typical circumstances prompting a trust modification petition include a deceased grantor who left ambiguous language, trustee authority that needs clarification, beneficiaries who contest the trust terms, and life events such as marriage, divorce, or disability that make original provisions impractical. Another common situation is correcting scrivener’s errors or updating the trust to reflect changes in assets and account ownership. In each case, a petition gives the court the opportunity to consider evidence and issue an order that updates the trust in a manner consistent with legal standards.
When the grantor has died and the trust contains ambiguous or inconsistent provisions, a petition can resolve how the trust should be interpreted and administered. Courts examine the document and relevant evidence to determine the grantor’s likely intent and to correct contradictions that hinder administration. This process protects beneficiaries by providing an authoritative construction of the trust, enabling trustees to distribute assets correctly and preventing prolonged disputes that could deplete trust resources or delay distributions to intended recipients.
Significant family changes like divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths can make original trust provisions inconsistent with current relationships and needs. A petition allows the trust to be updated formally so that distributions align with the grantor’s revised wishes or address support needs for new dependents. Courts consider whether requested changes are consistent with the trust’s purpose and whether beneficiaries are protected. This approach provides a legal mechanism to ensure that the trust reflects present circumstances rather than outdated assumptions.
Changes in tax law, retirement account rules, or the composition of assets can necessitate trust modifications to avoid unintended tax consequences or to enable efficient administration. A petition can authorize structural changes, adjust fiduciary powers, or permit transfers that improve tax outcomes or simplify management. By seeking court approval, trustees gain clear authority to take necessary administrative actions while ensuring that the trust continues to serve its intended purposes in light of evolving financial and legal conditions.
We provide guidance and representation for trust modification petitions serving residents of Temple City and nearby areas in Los Angeles County. Whether you need to correct a trust, update beneficiary designations, clarify trustee powers, or seek a judicial construction, our approach emphasizes careful review, clear communication, and diligent preparation of petition documents. We help clients understand procedural requirements, prepare the necessary filings and notices, and represent their interests in court when hearings are required, all with the goal of preserving family intentions and facilitating effective trust administration.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning matters for clients across California, offering assistance with trust creation, administration, and modification petitions. Our practice emphasizes thorough document review and practical strategies tailored to each client’s goals, whether updating a revocable living trust or seeking court approval for a complex modification. We prioritize clear explanations of options, realistic timelines, and effective representation in court when needed, ensuring clients understand the process and can make informed decisions for their family’s future.
Clients can expect careful preparation of petition materials, timely notice to interested parties, and focused advocacy at hearings to present the facts and legal basis for modifications. We coordinate with accountants, financial institutions, and other professionals as needed to address tax and administrative concerns associated with changes. Our aim is to provide reliable guidance throughout the petition process so trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with confidence and minimize delays in trust administration.
Communication and responsiveness are central to our approach. We explain complex issues in straightforward terms, outline potential outcomes, and keep clients informed at every step. When disputes or ambiguities arise, we work to resolve matters efficiently, whether through negotiations, settlement discussions, or court hearings. Our goal is to achieve durable results that reflect client intentions and protect beneficiaries while minimizing emotional and financial strain during the process.
Our firm follows a structured process for trust modification petitions that begins with a document review and fact-gathering phase. We identify the specific changes requested, assess whether informal amendment is possible, and determine whether court approval is required. We then prepare the petition, supporting declarations, proposed order, and notice to interested parties. If objections arise, we represent clients at hearings and seek resolutions that align with the trust’s purpose. Throughout, we keep clients informed and work to obtain clear, enforceable outcomes that facilitate administration.
The first step involves reviewing the trust and related documents to understand the grantor’s intent, identify amendment clauses, and gather facts supporting the proposed change. We evaluate whether the trust allows for private amendment or whether a petition is necessary, and we develop a strategy that considers beneficiary interests and likely court response. This phase also includes locating interested parties, compiling evidence, and outlining the proposed modifications in a way that will be clear and persuasive to the court if judicial approval becomes necessary.
During document review, we examine the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that sheds light on the grantor’s intent and the reasons for change. Gathering evidence may involve medical records, financial documents, or testimony supporting the requested modification. Clear, well-organized evidence is essential to persuade a court that the proposed change is appropriate and aligned with the trust’s purpose. Effective preparation at this stage often determines whether the petition will be resolved quickly or require further litigation.
We determine who must receive notice under California probate law, including beneficiaries, heirs, and certain creditors or guardians when applicable. Proper notice preserves rights and avoids delays due to defective service. We prepare and serve the required documents and file proof of service with the court. Addressing notice requirements carefully is critical to ensuring the court has jurisdiction to decide the petition and that any resulting order is enforceable against all affected parties.
In the filing stage, we draft the petition and supporting declarations that explain the requested modifications, present evidence, and propose an order for the judge. The petition sets forth legal grounds for the change and demonstrates why the modification is consistent with the trust’s objectives. We ensure all filing requirements and local court rules are followed, submit the documents to the court, and serve copies on interested parties. Proper preparation at filing increases the likelihood of a favorable and timely resolution.
Drafting involves clearly stating the current trust provisions, the specific language to be changed, and the legal and factual support for the requested modification. The proposed order guides the court in implementing the change if approved. Careful drafting anticipates potential objections and addresses them proactively to ease the court’s decision. Including precise language for replacement provisions helps trustees and third parties carry out the modified terms without additional interpretation or litigation.
After filing, we ensure that all interested parties receive proper service of the petition and supporting papers. Serving notice according to legal requirements allows those affected to object or consent and helps the court proceed with an informed record. We file proof of service with the court and track any responses or objections. Timely and correct service prevents procedural challenges that could delay resolution, and it preserves the integrity of the court’s authority to approve the modification.
If objections arise or the judge requires further review, the court will schedule a hearing where parties can present evidence and arguments. We prepare witness statements, supporting exhibits, and legal briefs as needed to present a persuasive case. Courts assess the grantor’s intent, beneficiaries’ interests, and whether the modification serves the trust’s purpose. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order that implements the change. That order becomes part of the trust’s legal record and guides trustees in administering the modified terms.
Preparing for a hearing includes assembling evidence, preparing witnesses, and developing clear legal arguments that show the modification is appropriate. We anticipate likely objections and prepare responses to demonstrate that the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s intent and protects beneficiary interests. Effective hearing preparation aims to present the court with a concise factual record and persuasive legal framework so the judge can make an informed ruling without unnecessary delay.
Once the court issues an order approving the modification, we help implement the changes by updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and advising trustees on administration under the new terms. We ensure the order is properly recorded or filed where necessary and coordinate transfers or re-titling of assets in line with the modified provisions. This phase ensures the court’s decision leads to practical results and that trustees have the documentation needed to act without risk of future challenge.
To file a trust modification petition in California, you must prepare a formal petition that identifies the trust, explains the proposed change, and sets forth factual and legal grounds for the request. The petition should include a copy of the trust with proposed revisions highlighted and supporting declarations or evidence that justify the modification. Proper notice must be served on all required parties, such as beneficiaries and heirs, and proof of service must be filed with the court. Local court rules dictate filing formats and fees, so following those procedures carefully is important. In many cases, additional documentation such as medical records, financial statements, or affidavits from witnesses may strengthen the petition by demonstrating changed circumstances or drafting errors. A proposed order for the judge to sign is usually submitted with the petition to show the exact relief requested. The court will review the materials, consider any objections, and may schedule a hearing if further testimony or argument is needed before issuing a ruling.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed trust modification by filing written objections with the court and presenting their concerns during any scheduled hearing. An objection usually argues that the proposed change contradicts the grantor’s intent, harms the objecting beneficiary’s rights, or lacks sufficient evidence to justify the modification. Beneficiaries must be given proper notice of the petition so they have the opportunity to respond, and their objections become part of the court record for consideration during the decision-making process. When objections arise, courts carefully weigh the interests of all parties and assess evidence supporting the requested change. In some cases, objections can lead to negotiated settlements that modify the petition or reach a compromise, while in others the court may hold a hearing and issue a ruling based on the factual record. Effective responses to objections often involve clear documentation of the reasons for the modification and legal arguments showing the change aligns with the trust’s purpose and applicable law.
The timeline for a trust modification petition can vary depending on the court’s schedule, the complexity of the issues, and whether beneficiaries object. Simple matters with no objections may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested petitions involving extensive evidence or multiple parties can take significantly longer. Preparing thorough documentation and following all procedural requirements helps avoid delays related to defective filings or improper notice, which are common reasons for extensions. If a hearing is necessary, additional time is required to prepare witness testimony, exhibits, and legal briefs. Settlement negotiations can also extend or shorten the timeline depending on how quickly parties reach agreement. Working proactively to address likely objections and to provide clear supporting evidence often leads to a more efficient process and a faster court resolution where appropriate.
Modifying a trust can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the change. Certain structural modifications may alter tax treatment of assets, affect basis adjustments, or change the way retirement accounts are handled within estate planning. Creditors may have claims that relate to distributions or transfers depending on timing and the legal effect of the modification. It is important to consider potential tax and creditor consequences when proposing changes so that the modification does not create unintended liabilities or adverse tax results. Consulting with tax or financial professionals as part of the planning process can help identify and mitigate risks associated with modifications. Courts also review whether changes may prejudice creditors or otherwise conflict with legal obligations. When necessary, a modification petition can include provisions or orders that address potential creditor concerns or clarify administrative steps to reduce adverse impacts on estate tax positions or creditor claims.
Yes, a trustee can petition the court to modify a trust when authority is needed to administer the trust effectively or when the trustee faces uncertainties in interpretation. Trustees may seek clarification of ambiguous terms, expanded authority to manage assets, or court approval for changes that respond to unforeseen circumstances. The trustee’s role requires acting in beneficiaries’ best interests, and a petition can provide judicial authorization to proceed in ways that protect beneficiaries and enable proper administration under updated terms. When a trustee petitions for modification, courts evaluate whether the requested changes serve the trust’s purpose and protect beneficiary rights. Trustees must provide clear factual support for the modification and demonstrate that the change is necessary for effective administration or to correct errors. Courts will also ensure that notice is given to interested parties and that any potential conflicts of interest are addressed before granting relief.
Court approval is not always necessary to change a trust. If the grantor is alive and the trust contains a valid amendment clause that the grantor follows, changes can often be made privately without court involvement. Beneficiaries with full legal capacity may also agree to modifications by written consent in some situations. These informal routes are typically quicker, less expensive, and maintain privacy because they do not create public court records. However, when the grantor is deceased or incapacitated, when amendment language is unclear or absent, or when beneficiaries object, court approval is often required. A petition becomes the formal mechanism to obtain judicial authorization for changes that cannot be made privately. The decision to pursue a petition depends on the trust’s terms, stakeholder consensus, and the nature of the proposed change.
Courts consider a range of evidence in trust modification petitions, including the trust document itself, related estate planning instruments, declarations from interested parties, and any contemporaneous communications that shed light on the grantor’s intent. Medical records, financial statements, and affidavits from witnesses who observed the grantor’s intentions can also be relevant. The court assesses whether the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and whether the evidence supports that outcome without unfairly harming beneficiaries with vested interests. Judges also consider statutory standards and precedent that guide when modifications are permitted, including whether the change corrects a drafting mistake, responds to changed circumstances, or is necessary for practical administration. Clear, well-organized evidence that addresses these issues generally strengthens a petition and helps the court reach a reasoned decision based on the trust’s goals and applicable law.
Courts use procedural safeguards to protect minors and individuals with disabilities during trust modifications. This may include appointment of a guardian ad litem to represent their interests, requiring additional notice, or ordering independent evaluations to confirm that proposed changes serve those beneficiaries’ welfare. Such measures ensure that modifications do not reduce essential support or otherwise jeopardize the care and resources those beneficiaries rely upon under the trust’s terms. Legal counsel and court-appointed representatives work to ensure that any modifications balance the needs of vulnerable beneficiaries with the overall goals of the trust. Courts take a cautious approach and often require detailed evidence demonstrating that proposed changes will not harm these beneficiaries and that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect their long-term interests.
Common reasons courts deny trust modification petitions include insufficient evidence of the grantor’s intent, proposed changes that would unjustly prejudice beneficiaries with vested interests, or petitions that attempt to circumvent clear statutory protections. If the petition fails to show a legal basis—such as correcting a drafting mistake or addressing materially changed circumstances—the court may reject the request. Procedural defects like improper notice or incomplete filings can also lead to denial or dismissal until corrected. Courts are mindful of preserving the integrity of trust documents and protecting beneficiary rights. To avoid denials, petitioners should present comprehensive evidence, follow notice requirements precisely, and demonstrate that the modification is consistent with the trust’s purpose. Addressing potential objections proactively often reduces the risk of an unfavorable ruling.
The cost to file a trust modification petition varies based on factors like court filing fees, the complexity of the matter, whether contested hearings are required, and whether expert testimony or additional professionals are needed. Some cases proceed with minimal expense when parties agree, while contested matters with multiple hearings and extensive discovery can be significantly more costly. Local court fee schedules and the need for specialized analyses, such as tax or valuation studies, also affect total costs. Planning for expected expenses and discussing fee structures early in the process helps clients understand likely costs and options to manage them. When possible, reaching a settlement or limiting disputes reduces expense. Transparent communication about anticipated fees and strategies for efficient resolution can help clients make informed decisions about how to pursue a modification.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas