A Heggstad petition can be an important tool when a named trustee or successor trustee needs court confirmation that assets pass to a trust rather than to an individual beneficiary or estate. If a decedent’s assets were not properly retitled into a revocable living trust before death, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership so assets can be distributed according to the trust terms. This process helps families avoid an extended probate and provides a clear path for trustees to administer and transfer property. It is often used alongside related estate planning documents to preserve the settlor’s intent and streamline administration.
When families in Topanga or elsewhere in Los Angeles County encounter property that was intended to be held in a trust but remains in a deceased person’s name, a Heggstad petition clarifies legal title and authorizes trustees to manage or transfer those assets. The petition outlines the trust, the settlor’s intent, and the trustee’s right to carry out the trust terms. While each case is fact-specific, prompt action can reduce delay, preserve value, and limit disputes among beneficiaries. Early communication with the trustee and clear documentation make the Heggstad process smoother and more predictable.
A Heggstad petition is valuable because it prevents assets from getting caught in probate when the decedent clearly intended they be held in trust. By asking a court to confirm trust ownership, trustees can more confidently transfer assets to the trust, access accounts, sell property, or distribute funds to beneficiaries according to the trust terms. This clarification reduces uncertainty that can lead to delays, creditor claims, or family disagreements. In practice, the petition often restores the intended flow of estate administration, preserves privacy compared with probate, and helps trustees meet their duties while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides trusted estate planning and trust administration guidance to individuals and families throughout California. Our team focuses on practical solutions for trust administration tasks such as Heggstad petitions, trust transfers, and related filings. We combine detailed document review, careful court filings, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to reduce friction during administration. Clients appreciate a straightforward, methodical approach that explains options, timelines, and likely outcomes so families can make informed decisions during a sensitive time.
A Heggstad petition is a focused court procedure used when property was intended to be held in a trust but remains in the decedent’s individual name at death. The petition typically asks a probate court to find that the decedent held the property as trustee of the trust or that a transfer should be recognized in favor of the trust. By establishing the trust’s ownership, trustees can then manage and distribute assets according to the trust instrument. This mechanism serves families when paperwork or timing prevented proper retitling before death and when beneficiaries seek a clear path to carry out the settlor’s wishes.
The Heggstad process involves gathering trust documents, title records, and other evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the trustee’s authority. The petition explains why the asset was not transferred earlier, who the affected parties are, and what relief the petition requests. Courts review the facts, supporting declarations, and legal arguments before issuing an order confirming ownership or permitting transfer. While not appropriate for every matter, this approach can be faster and less intrusive than full probate, helping trustees complete administration with court approval and legal certainty.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that specific property belongs to a trust despite the title being in the decedent’s name at the time of death. The petition relies on documentary and testimonial evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and that courts should recognize the transfer as effective for trust administration. The order requested typically allows trustees to retitle, sell, or distribute the asset without opening a full probate estate, which preserves time and privacy. Proper preparation and credible evidence are essential for convincing a court to grant the requested relief.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires compiling the trust agreement, declarations from the trustee or other witnesses, title documents, and any relevant correspondence showing intent to include the asset in the trust. The petition must identify interested parties and provide clear arguments for why the court should recognize trust ownership. After filing, the petition is served on heirs, beneficiaries, and creditors as required, and the court may set a hearing to review the evidence. If the court finds the petition persuasive, it will issue an order allowing the trustee to proceed with administration consistent with the trust’s terms.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the Heggstad process. Terms include trustee, settlor, trust instrument, title, probate, pour-over will, and notice. Each of these relates to how assets were intended to pass and which legal mechanisms are available when retitling was not completed before death. Clear definitions allow parties to communicate effectively with the court and with each other, reduce misunderstandings, and speed resolution. Knowing these terms also helps families gather the right documentation and describe the facts clearly in any filing.
A trustee is the person or entity authorized by a trust document to manage, control, and distribute trust property for the benefit of the beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee typically seeks court confirmation that specific assets belong to the trust so the trustee can exercise fiduciary duties. Trustees must act reasonably, keep accurate records, and follow the trust terms when distributing assets. In the context of a petition, the trustee provides evidence and declarations explaining the need for court recognition to allow proper administration and transfer of titled property.
A pour-over will functions alongside a trust by directing assets that remain in an individual’s name at death to the trust. If an asset was not retitled before death, the pour-over will may move it to the trust through probate. A Heggstad petition, in contrast, seeks a court declaration to avoid or minimize probate by establishing the trust’s ownership without requiring a full probate administration. Understanding how a pour-over will interacts with trust transfers helps trustees and heirs decide whether a petition or probate route better achieves timely distribution of assets according to the settlor’s plan.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and provided the assets and instructions governing its use. A Heggstad petition must often show that the settlor intended a particular asset to be part of the trust, even if the asset remained in the settlor’s name. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent can involve trust language, account statements, transfer records, or other evidence that the asset was held for the trust’s benefit. Establishing that intent is central to convincing a court to recognize the trust’s ownership so trustees can carry out the settlor’s directives.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate, paying debts, and distributing assets when no trust or other transfer mechanism applies. Probate can be time-consuming, public, and expensive compared with transfers that proceed through trust administration. A Heggstad petition is a tool used to limit probate involvement by getting a court to confirm trust ownership of assets that were intended to be in the trust. When successful, the petition reduces the need for a full probate process and allows trustees to distribute assets according to the trust instrument.
When addressing improperly titled assets after death, families can choose different legal paths depending on circumstances. Probate may be necessary when assets lack clear documentation showing trust ownership. A Heggstad petition aims to avoid or shorten probate by proving a trust’s claim to specific property. Other options include filing a small estate affidavit or using beneficiary designations if available. The right choice depends on the asset type, value, available documentation, and the level of dispute among heirs. A careful evaluation of those factors helps determine the most efficient and protective route for property transfer.
A limited approach may work when account statements, deeds, and trust documents plainly show the decedent intended the asset to be held in trust and the title issue is largely ministerial. If financial institutions or a title company will accept the trust documents with minimal court involvement, trustees can often retitle assets without a formal petition. That path can be faster and less costly, but it requires reliable documentation and cooperation from third parties. When records and communications demonstrate intent, informal resolution can protect beneficiaries and reduce stress during administration.
If the assets in question are low in value or already have beneficiary designations that transfer on death, a formal court petition may not be necessary. Small estate procedures or direct transfer forms with banks and brokers can sometimes achieve the needed result without litigation. Trustees should carefully verify applicable thresholds and procedural requirements, since reliance on informal transfers can backfire if a third party later challenges the status of the asset. When appropriate and permitted, these simpler routes preserve estate funds and reduce administrative complexity.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes important when title issues are complex, assets are high in value, or ownership is disputed among heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors. A detailed filing and careful court presentation reduce the risk of future challenges and provide stronger legal protection for trustees acting on behalf of the trust. When disputes are likely, taking a methodical course that includes formal petitions, full notice to interested parties, and airtight documentation helps protect the trust’s assets and the trustee’s decision-making authority while minimizing the chance of later litigation over distributions.
When several assets remain in the decedent’s name or when estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, and retirement plan trusts interact, a comprehensive strategy is often necessary. Coordinating transfers, addressing creditor claims, and updating trust records may require multiple filings or combined petitions. Thorough legal planning ensures that transfers are consistent across assets and documents, avoids unintended tax or title consequences, and supports a smooth final distribution according to the settlor’s overall plan. This holistic approach protects beneficiaries and streamlines administration in complex estates.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions and related trust administration reduces the risk of future litigation and clarifies title across multiple assets. By addressing potential conflicts, notifying interested parties, and securing court orders where appropriate, trustees minimize ambiguity about ownership and distribution authority. This method also helps preserve asset value by allowing timely sales or transfers when necessary and fosters clear recordkeeping that benefits beneficiaries. Ultimately, a more complete strategy supports orderly administration and minimizes surprises during what can be an emotional period for families.
Coordinated legal work also provides a single roadmap for trustees, beneficiaries, and professionals such as title companies or financial institutions. When filings are well-prepared and supported by evidence, the court is more likely to issue needed orders quickly, reducing delay and expense. A broad approach can also address secondary issues like updating trust instruments, filing trust certifications, and preparing pour-over wills, so that all elements of a decedent’s estate plan work together to effect the settlor’s intent. This reduces the likelihood of fragmented handling and inconsistent outcomes.
Securing court orders through a thorough petition process delivers greater legal certainty for trustees and beneficiaries by documenting the basis for transfers and confirming ownership. This reduces the potential for later challenges by heirs or creditors and enables trustees to act with confidence when selling, retitling, or distributing property. Clear judicial findings preserve the settlor’s intent and provide a record that third parties such as banks and title companies can rely upon, simplifying administrative steps and cutting down on delays that can erode asset values or complicate distributions.
By identifying and resolving title issues early through comprehensive filings, trustees reduce the administrative burden and the likelihood of contested distributions. The process clarifies responsibilities and deadlines, enabling trustees to meet fiduciary duties and communicate a clear timeline to beneficiaries. Effective coordination with financial institutions and title companies shortens delays and reduces the risk of errors. Overall, this approach preserves estate resources by minimizing repeated litigation and supports a smoother transition of assets to the trust beneficiaries.
Start by collecting all relevant trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent. Early assembly of these records reduces the risk of delays and supports a convincing presentation to the court. Include copies of the trust instrument, amendments, and trustee appointment language, as well as evidence of control over the asset prior to death if available. Clear documentation helps trustees explain why the property should be treated as trust property and can significantly shorten the court’s review time.
Notify heirs, beneficiaries, and potential creditors early in the process to reduce surprises and limit contests later. Timely notice and transparency can lessen the likelihood of objections and demonstrate good faith by the trustee. Where contact information is uncertain, take reasonable steps to locate interested parties and document those efforts. Clear communication about the proposed petition, the evidence supporting it, and the intended administrative timeline often eases tensions and supports a more cooperative resolution of title issues.
Families should consider a Heggstad petition when assets remain in the decedent’s name but the trust document and surrounding facts demonstrate the assets were meant to be part of the trust. This situation often arises with real property, bank accounts, or securities that were not retitled due to timing or oversight. A timely petition can avoid opening a lengthy probate case, allow trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust, and provide formal court approval of the trust’s ownership. Consideration should also include potential disputes and the level of documentary support available.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is when third parties like title companies or financial institutions require a court order to accept trust ownership. In some cases, informal retitling is not sufficient, and a judicial declaration clears obstacles to transfer. Additionally, when estate assets are substantial or there is potential for creditor claims, seeking court confirmation can protect trustees and beneficiaries by creating a formal record that supports later decisions. Timely legal review helps families choose the most appropriate path for their circumstances.
Typical situations include newly acquired property that was never retitled, assets purchased close to the settlor’s death, accounts mistakenly held in individual rather than trust name, and transfers that were intended but not completed. Additional circumstances include deeds that were prepared but not recorded, or property that was informally placed into a trust arrangement without formal title changes. When these gaps are discovered after death, a Heggstad petition clarifies ownership and authorizes trustees to proceed with administration in a way that aligns with the settlor’s documented plan.
Real estate sometimes remains titled in the decedent’s name from an oversight, a timing issue, or a transfer that was never completed. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize that the property was meant to be held in trust, allowing trustees to retitle, sell, or distribute the property in accordance with the trust’s provisions. Accurate deeds, trust excerpts, and any written evidence showing intent are helpful when presenting the case, and a court order provides the clarity needed for title companies and potential buyers.
Bank and investment accounts are frequently overlooked when updating title after creating a trust, and they may still bear the decedent’s individual name at death. Institutions may require a court order or other documentation before releasing funds or transferring accounts to a trustee. A Heggstad petition documents that the funds were intended for the trust and requests judicial recognition of the trustee’s authority. Careful assembly of account records and trust language showing intent supports a prompt resolution with minimal interruption to trust administration.
When assets were acquired or transferred just before a settlor’s death, there may not have been an opportunity to fully complete retitling into the trust. These circumstances often produce disputes about whether the property belongs to the estate or the trust. A Heggstad petition presents evidence regarding intent, timing, and the settlor’s plan to clarify ownership. Resolving these questions quickly protects value, enables appropriate distribution, and avoids protracted uncertainty for beneficiaries while preserving the settlor’s wishes.
We assist trustees and families in Topanga and throughout Los Angeles County with Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related estate planning matters. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough document preparation, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. We can help assemble the necessary paperwork, draft declarations, coordinate notice to interested parties, and present a concise petition to the court. Our goal is to reduce delay and uncertainty so trustees can focus on managing and distributing trust assets according to the settlor’s intentions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings focused experience in estate planning and trust administration to the handling of Heggstad petitions. We emphasize careful document review and thorough preparation so trustees have the evidence needed to present a persuasive petition. Our team works to explain the process, required documentation, and likely timeline in plain terms, helping clients understand what to expect and how to proceed. This practical guidance helps families move forward with confidence during administration tasks.
We coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and other professionals to streamline transfers and minimize administrative burdens for trustees. The firm prepares clear declarations and legal filings designed to address common questions a court will raise, reducing the chance of unnecessary delay. When disputes arise, we aim to resolve matters efficiently through negotiation where possible while preserving the trust’s goals. Our approach balances assertive representation with pragmatic problem solving to reach outcomes consistent with the settlor’s plan.
Local knowledge of filing procedures and court expectations in Los Angeles County helps ensure petitions are presented in the most effective way for a given circumstance. We provide responsive client communication, timely updates on case progress, and careful budgeting of legal steps so trustees can make decisions about filing and service. By guiding families through each step, we help restore normal trust administration and reduce stress so that assets are transferred and distributed according to the settlor’s documented wishes.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the assets at issue, review trust and title documents, and determine whether a Heggstad petition is the most appropriate path. We then gather supporting records, prepare sworn declarations, and draft a concise petition tailored to the facts. We handle service on interested parties, file the petition with the court, and represent the trustee at any hearing. Throughout this process we keep clients informed, coordinate with third parties like banks and title companies, and aim for an efficient resolution that honors the settlor’s plans.
The initial step focuses on collecting and reviewing the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence relevant to the asset’s intended treatment. We evaluate whether the available evidence supports a Heggstad petition or whether alternative routes like probate or informal transfers are necessary. This stage also identifies interested parties and assesses potential objections or creditor concerns. A careful assessment sets the stage for a focused petition and helps estimate timing and potential costs for the trustee and beneficiaries.
We request and review the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, account statements, and any documents showing interactions with financial institutions. This includes searching public records where necessary to confirm title history and ensure all relevant filings are located. Clear organization of documents makes it easier to draft persuasive declarations and reduces the chance of missing evidence that could support the petition. A comprehensive document set is essential to present a clear factual narrative to the court.
During this phase we identify heirs, beneficiaries, and creditors who must be given notice and determine whether disputes are likely. Anticipating common objections lets us tailor filings to address them proactively, reducing surprises and delays. We also assess creditor exposure and any statutory notice requirements that could affect timing. Early identification of potential issues improves the petition’s clarity and helps trustees prepare for possible proceedings or negotiations with interested parties.
Once documents and facts are assembled, we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, making a clear legal and factual case for recognizing trust ownership. The filing package includes the petition, declarations, exhibits such as trust excerpts and title records, and proposed orders for the court. We then file the documents with the appropriate probate court and arrange service on required parties. Attention to procedural detail at this stage reduces the chance of technical defects and increases the chance of a favorable court ruling.
Declarations from the trustee and knowledgeable witnesses describe the circumstances behind the asset’s title and the settlor’s intent, and exhibits provide documentary proof. We carefully craft those declarations to be factual, clear, and demonstrative of the evidence supporting trust ownership. Exhibits are organized to match points in the declarations, so the court can easily verify the connection between the trust and the asset. This careful presentation helps the judge understand the situation without having to piece disparate evidence together.
After filing the petition, we ensure all interested parties receive proper notice as required by law, which may include heirs, named beneficiaries, and creditors. We prepare proof of service and respond to any initial inquiries or objections that arise. Proper notice and documentation support the court’s ability to decide the matter on the merits and help avoid delays caused by defective service or missing parties. Good procedural handling is central to achieving a timely court order that trustees and third parties can rely upon.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the case and respond to any objections raised by interested parties. The judge reviews the petition, declarations, and exhibits before issuing an order that confirms trust ownership or authorizes specific transfers. Once the order is entered, trustees can retitle property, access accounts, or distribute assets according to the trust. We assist with post-order steps, such as preparing deeds, providing certified copies of orders to financial institutions, and closing the matter efficiently for the benefit of beneficiaries.
At the hearing, we explain the facts, summarize the evidence, and address any legal questions the court or opposing parties raise. Our goal is to present a clear and well-supported narrative so the judge can confidently make the findings needed to approve the requested relief. If objections are raised, we seek practical resolutions that preserve fiduciary duties and protect beneficiaries’ interests. After a favorable hearing, the court issues an order that gives trustees the authority to proceed with administrative tasks.
Following entry of the court order, we assist trustees with the operational steps needed to complete transfers, such as preparing deeds, submitting certified orders to banks, and coordinating with title companies for retitling. We also document the process for trust records and advise on distribution mechanics consistent with the trust instrument. Careful follow-through helps prevent later disputes and ensures that assets pass to beneficiaries in a manner consistent with the settlor’s intentions and with court approval.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize specific property as belonging to a trust despite the asset remaining in the decedent’s individual name. It is commonly used when the settlor intended an asset to be held in a revocable living trust but title was not transferred prior to death. The petition presents documentary and sworn evidence of the settlor’s intent and requests an order allowing the trustee to retitle or distribute the asset according to the trust. This judicial recognition provides the authority trustees need to complete administration without full probate. This petition is appropriate when adequate documentation exists to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and when avoiding probate or clarifying ownership is a primary goal. It is not the only option in every case, and factors such as the asset type, value, potential creditor claims, and the presence of contested heirs affect whether a petition is advisable. Careful review of trust documents and title records helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the right tool given the specific facts.
The time required varies depending on the court’s schedule, the completeness of documentation, and whether objections are filed. In straightforward, uncontested matters with full documentation, a Heggstad petition can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months from filing. More complex situations, disputed matters, or cases requiring additional evidence can extend the timeline significantly. Courts in Los Angeles County process many probate matters, so calendar availability and required notice periods are important considerations for estimating timing. To minimize delay, preparing a complete petition with strong supporting exhibits and clear declarations helps the court act more quickly. Prompt service on interested parties and proactive communication with beneficiaries can also reduce the likelihood of contested hearings. While timing can never be guaranteed, thorough preparation and early coordination with the court and interested parties provide the best opportunity for a timely resolution.
The strongest petitions include the trust document and any amendments showing the relevant asset should be part of the trust, deeds or account statements that show the asset’s history, and sworn declarations from the trustee and witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s plan, drafts of deeds or transfer documents, and records of attempts to retitle the property are also useful. These materials together create a factual narrative that supports the legal claim that the asset belongs to the trust. Courts evaluate both documentary evidence and witness testimony to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property. Clear, organized exhibits tied to specific statements in declarations make the court’s review simpler and more persuasive. The absence of key records may increase the need for supplemental proof or make alternative approaches like probate more likely, so early and thorough document collection is essential.
A Heggstad petition can often avoid or limit the scope of probate for specific assets when the court finds the evidence supports trust ownership. However, it does not automatically prevent probate in every circumstance. If multiple assets are involved, creditor issues exist, or the documentation is insufficient, the court may require a probate administration for certain matters. Additionally, if a pour-over will must be probated for other estate assets, that process may continue alongside or separate from a Heggstad petition for particular property. Because outcomes depend on facts and available documentation, trustees should seek a careful assessment of whether a petition will effectively avoid probate for the assets at issue. Preparing solid evidence and addressing potential creditor or heir concerns improves the chance that the court will grant the requested relief and limit the need for a full probate administration.
When a Heggstad petition is filed, the court’s rules require notice to interested parties such as heirs, beneficiaries named in the trust or will, and known creditors. The petitioner typically prepares and serves the required forms and proof of service documents to demonstrate that proper notice was given. The specific notice requirements depend on the jurisdiction and the nature of the relief requested, so it is important to follow local rules closely to avoid procedural defects that could delay the matter. If any interested party cannot be located, the petitioner may need to take additional steps such as publishing notice in approved publications or filing declarations of due diligence describing efforts to locate missing parties. Proper documentation of notice efforts and timely service helps protect the petition from challenges based on lack of notice and supports a smoother path to a court order confirming trust ownership.
Whether a trustee may sell property while a Heggstad petition is pending depends on the nature of the asset, any court-imposed restrictions, and the policies of third parties involved. In many cases, courts prefer trustees to wait until an order is entered so that title issues are resolved before transfer. However, in urgent circumstances where holding the property risks loss or expense, the court may grant limited interim authority to act. Trustees should avoid unilateral sales without court authorization when the asset’s ownership is disputed or unclear. If expedited action is necessary, trustees can request temporary relief from the court explaining the reasons and providing safeguards for interested parties. Seeking court permission or guidance avoids later disputes and protects the trustee from allegations of improper administration. Coordination with buyers, title companies, and the court minimizes the risk associated with transactions during a pending petition.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the number of affected assets, and whether hearings or contested matters arise. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified documents, service fees for notice, and legal fees for drafting the petition, declarations, and exhibits. Where matters are straightforward, overall costs can be relatively moderate. More complex or contested matters naturally require more time and incur higher expenses due to additional filings, discovery, or litigation-related work. Trustees can reduce expenses by assembling organized documentation, identifying interested parties early, and pursuing informal transfers when appropriate. Discussing likely costs and potential alternatives at the outset helps trustees make informed choices about whether to proceed with a formal petition or explore other pathways that may be more economical given the value and nature of the assets involved.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection along with the submitted evidence and may schedule hearings to resolve disputed issues. Objections typically raise questions about the settlor’s intent, the adequacy of documentation, or competing claims to the property. The trustee and counsel can respond with additional evidence, witness declarations, or legal argument to address the objection. If the objection has merit, the court may deny the petition or require additional steps to protect the objecting party’s interests. Often, disputes can be narrowed or resolved through negotiation before a contested hearing becomes necessary. Providing clear evidence and engaging in open communication with objecting parties can lead to settlements or agreed orders that accomplish the transfer while reducing expense and delay. When settlement is not possible, a hearing will give the court the opportunity to make definitive factual findings and issue an order resolving ownership.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include proceeding with probate administration, using small estate procedures where eligible, pursuing informal retitling with cooperation from financial institutions, or employing beneficiary designation mechanisms if they apply. Each alternative has pros and cons depending on the asset type, value, and the presence of disputes. Probate may be unavoidable in some circumstances, but it provides a comprehensive, court-supervised process for settling debts and distributing assets when trust recognition is not feasible. Choosing the right avenue depends on documentation, the number and nature of assets, creditor concerns, and the willingness of third parties to accept trust documents without court orders. A careful review of these factors helps trustees and families select the most efficient path, balancing cost, speed, and legal protection for beneficiaries.
Trustees can prepare efficiently by collecting the trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, and correspondence showing the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust. Clear organization of these records and identification of all interested parties speeds petition preparation and reduces the chance of missing information that could delay court action. Preparing detailed sworn declarations explaining why retitling did not occur before death and how the asset was handled helps present a persuasive case to the court. Additionally, trustees should determine whether third parties such as banks or title companies have specific requirements that might affect the petition and gather any supporting records from those institutions. Early communication with potential beneficiaries and a good faith effort to provide notice reduces the risk of objections and supports a smoother, more predictable court process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas