If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Topanga, a trust modification petition can provide a legal pathway to update provisions, correct errors, or adapt to new circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients throughout Los Angeles County with careful review of trust documents and clear guidance on when a petition is the appropriate step. We explain procedural requirements under California law, potential court involvement, and options that may avoid litigation. This introductory overview prepares you to evaluate whether a modification petition aligns with your goals and the needs of your family or beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition can address a range of situations, from clarifying ambiguous language to responding to changed family dynamics or tax considerations. In Topanga, where property and family circumstances often evolve, a petition lets account for new realities while preserving the integrity of the trust. Our approach emphasizes careful document analysis, clear communication about potential outcomes, and thorough explanation of timelines and court procedures when necessary. This section outlines the typical scenarios leading to a petition and the practical steps you can expect when pursuing modification under California law.
A trust modification petition is important because it provides a formal legal mechanism to update or clarify trust terms when circumstances have changed since the trust was created. Modifications can prevent future disputes among beneficiaries, ensure that the trust reflects current intentions, and address tax or asset management considerations. Filing a petition may involve court oversight, which can offer finality and a clear record of the modification. For many clients, pursuing a petition reduces long-term uncertainty and helps protect family relationships by resolving contested issues within a structured legal framework.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Los Angeles County with a focus on estate planning and trust matters, including trust modification petitions. The firm provides detailed document review, personalized counseling about possible changes, and representation in court when a petition is required. We prioritize practical solutions that minimize conflict and advance client objectives. Clients in Topanga turn to the firm for steady legal direction during sensitive transitions, such as family changes, updated asset ownership, or the need to correct drafting errors in existing trust instruments.
A trust modification petition in California is a legal filing asking the court to approve changes to a trust when the trust terms, settlor intent, or circumstances warrant intervention. Petitioning the court may be necessary when the trust document lacks a mechanism for amendment, when parties disagree on interpretation, or when a formal judicial determination is needed to resolve ambiguity. The process typically involves preparation of petition documents, notice to interested parties, and a hearing where the court evaluates the request against statutory standards and the trust’s original purpose. Understanding when court involvement is necessary helps clients select the most efficient route to achieve their goals.
Not every desired change requires a petition, and in some cases informal agreement among beneficiaries or use of amendment powers reserved in the trust instrument can accomplish updates. However, when those avenues are unavailable or contested, a petition provides a clear legal path to resolve disputes and effect revisions. The court considers evidence of settlor intent, the best interests of beneficiaries, and statutory requirements. Petition outcomes can include approval of specific changes, clarification of terms, or orders that guide the trustee’s administration of the trust going forward, providing legal certainty for all parties involved.
A trust modification petition asks the probate or superior court to change a trust’s provisions or to resolve uncertainties about the trust’s meaning or administration. California law provides several paths for modification, including agreements among beneficiaries where permitted, judicial petitions for modification or construction, and petitions to remove or replace trustees when administration is at issue. The court examines trust documents, relevant communications, and applicable statutes to determine whether a modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and legal criteria. Proper preparation of a petition includes compiling supporting declarations and relevant trust history to present a persuasive and orderly case.
Preparing a trust modification petition involves identifying the specific provisions to change, gathering documentation that supports the proposed revision, and notifying interested parties such as beneficiaries and trustees. The petition must present legal grounds for modification and factual evidence, and it should explain how the requested change furthers the trust’s purpose or corrects a mistake. Court procedures include filing the petition, serving notice, responding to any objections, and attending a hearing. Effective petitions are organized, grounded in relevant law, and designed to minimize disputes while achieving a durable resolution that the court can endorse.
Understanding key terms helps demystify the petition process. Terms commonly used in trust modification matters include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, amendment, reformation, and petition for instructions or construction. Each term has specific legal meaning influencing how courts evaluate proposed changes. For example, reformation addresses mistakes in drafting, while construction concerns interpreting unclear provisions. Familiarity with these concepts helps clients follow the process, identify appropriate remedies, and communicate effectively with counsel to prepare for hearings and possible negotiations with other parties.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and set its original terms. The settlor’s intent is central to any modification petition, as courts seek to honor the original purpose and direction of the trustmaker. Evidence of the settlor’s intent may include the trust document itself, related estate planning instruments, correspondence, and testimony from individuals familiar with the settlor’s wishes. When circumstances have changed since the settlor established the trust, petitions to modify must be presented in a way that respects the settlor’s documented intentions and legal constraints under California law.
Reformation is a legal remedy used to correct mistakes in a trust document so that the written terms reflect the settlor’s actual intent. A reformation petition requires evidence showing the discrepancy between intent and the instrument’s language, such as drafting errors or misunderstandings. The court may approve reformation when clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that the trust as written fails to capture the settlor’s true wishes. Reformation provides a way to align the document with original intent without completely rewriting the trust, preserving existing structures while correcting errors.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust terms and applicable law. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including loyalty and prudent administration. Disputes about trustee actions or interpretation of trustee powers often lead to petitions for instruction, modification, or removal. Courts can clarify trustee authority, approve modifications that change trustee duties, or address alleged breaches of duty. Evaluating trustee conduct and proposed changes to trustee responsibilities is a regular part of trust modification proceedings in California.
Construction refers to the judicial process of interpreting unclear or ambiguous provisions in a trust. When the language of a trust allows multiple reasonable interpretations, interested parties may petition the court for instructions on how the terms should be applied. The court evaluates evidence of settlor intent, the trust’s overall framework, and legal principles governing trust interpretation. Construction provides authoritative guidance for trustees and beneficiaries and can prevent future disputes by clarifying duties, distributions, and other operative provisions within the trust document.
When considering changes to a trust, clients may weigh informal agreements, use of amendment powers contained in the trust, or filing a formal petition. Informal paths can be quicker and less costly but require cooperation of all interested parties and clear authority under the trust instrument. A formal petition provides court oversight and a binding determination when agreements are not possible or when resolution requires judicial clarification. Choosing the right path depends on the trust’s language, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the legal risks associated with leaving issues unresolved without a court order.
If all beneficiaries and relevant parties agree on a change and the trust instrument allows for amendments or nonjudicial settlement agreements, an informal approach may be sufficient. Such agreements can be faster and less expensive than court proceedings, and they can preserve family relationships by resolving matters cooperatively. However, the parties must ensure that changes are properly documented and legally effective under California law. Legal review is advisable to confirm that the agreed revisions are permissible and to draft documents that clearly implement the parties’ understanding while protecting fiduciary duties.
Minor clarifications that do not alter the trust’s fundamental dispositions or the settlor’s intent may be handled through trustee actions, nonjudicial agreements, or limited amendment procedures provided in the trust. When changes are technical or administrative and do not increase conflict among beneficiaries, parties can often effect updates with less formal processes. It remains important to document any modifications carefully and confirm legal validity, as insufficient documentation can lead to future disagreements. Good recordkeeping ensures that minor adjustments do not become sources of later contention.
When beneficiaries dispute proposed changes or when trust language is ambiguous enough to prompt differing interpretations, filing a petition and securing legal representation helps ensure that your position is thoroughly presented to the court. A formal petition allows for evidentiary presentation, examination of relevant documents, and judicial resolution that binds all parties. Proper legal preparation anticipates likely objections, compiles necessary declarations and records, and frames arguments to align with statutory standards. This structured approach reduces uncertainty and helps protect the interests of those seeking appropriate modification or clarification.
When trust modifications implicate complex assets, business interests, retirement plans, or tax planning vehicles, the legal and financial consequences can be significant. A court-approved modification provides clarity and legal authority to implement intricate changes while ensuring that fiduciary duties are observed. Detailed petitions help address ancillary matters like re-titling, beneficiary designations, or interactions with retirement or life insurance trusts. Coordinating legal steps with financial and tax counsel can prevent unintended consequences and ensure that the modification achieves its intended purpose without creating new liabilities.
A comprehensive, court-approved modification offers legal finality, clear instructions for trustees, and a reduced risk of future disputes. When the court reviews and approves changes, the resulting order serves as an authoritative record that guides trust administration and protects trustees who act in accordance with the ruling. This pathway can be particularly valuable when parties are concerned about later challenges or when significant assets or complex arrangements are involved. The certainty provided by a judicial determination often outweighs the additional time and expense required to obtain formal approval.
Court involvement also clarifies responsibilities and reduces ambiguity, which can preserve relationships among beneficiaries by removing ongoing uncertainty. A comprehensive approach helps ensure that modifications are consistent with statutory requirements and the settlor’s intent. It also creates a documented trail that trustees and successor trustees can rely on, aiding continuity in trust administration. For many clients, the combination of legal clarity and protection against subsequent litigation makes a formal petition the preferable route when meaningful or contested changes are at issue.
Obtaining a court order approving a trust modification gives trustees guidance and insulation from liability when they act under the court’s direction. Trustees can rely on the judicial determination to administer the trust according to the revised terms without fearing later accusations of breach. This finality matters when assets are substantial or when successor trustees may encounter questions about past decisions. Documented court approval reduces ambiguity and helps ensure that distributions and administrative choices align with legally supported interpretations of the trust.
A court-approved modification creates a binding resolution that discourages future litigation by establishing a clear legal basis for the revised terms. When parties understand that the changes have been vetted and authorized by the court, they are less likely to pursue subsequent challenges. This stability benefits beneficiaries and trustees alike by lowering the chance of costly disputes and enabling steady administration. Achieving this level of certainty is especially valuable in families where emotions or competing interests might otherwise lead to recurrent disagreements.
Begin by collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, certification of trust, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intentions. Accurate and thorough documentation supports claims that a modification is necessary or justified, including evidence for reformation or construction requests. Records of asset ownership, beneficiary designations, and past trustee actions can be essential to the court’s evaluation. Well-organized materials help streamline the petition process and present a clearer, more persuasive case to interested parties and the court.
Evaluate whether proposed modifications have tax or financial implications, particularly when trusts include retirement accounts, life insurance, or business interests. Court-approved changes should align with broader estate planning objectives and avoid unintended tax consequences or re-titling issues. Coordination with financial advisors or tax counsel can identify potential pitfalls and help structure revisions that achieve desired outcomes without creating new liabilities. Thoughtful planning before filing reduces the likelihood of needing further corrective actions down the road.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s language is ambiguous, when a drafting error misstates the settlor’s intent, or when beneficiaries disagree about interpretation or administration. Changes in family structure, such as marriages, divorces, births, or deaths, can create reasons to update distributions or trustee roles. Additionally, changes in asset ownership or the emergence of tax planning needs may make formal modification appropriate. A petition may provide lasting clarity and protect trustees and beneficiaries by resolving uncertainties that could otherwise lead to disputes or improper administration.
You should also consider a petition when the trust lacks a mechanism for amendment but circumstances require alteration, or when a trustee’s actions raise concerns that must be addressed through court guidance. Petitioning the court is a way to secure enforceable changes and a record of judicial approval, which can be particularly valuable when substantial assets or complex arrangements are involved. Seeking legal direction early in the process helps evaluate alternatives, anticipate potential objections, and design a petition that stands up to judicial review under California law.
Typical circumstances prompting a petition include clarifying ambiguous beneficiary designations, addressing errors in the trust instrument, resolving disputes over trustee authority, reacting to significant changes in family dynamics, and accommodating tax or asset planning adjustments. Business interests or retirement accounts that interact with trust provisions may also necessitate judicial clarification. Courts often become involved when parties cannot reach agreement through nonjudicial means or when the trust requires authoritative interpretation to guide trustees and beneficiaries fairly and consistently.
When trust language is unclear or contains conflicting provisions, a petition for construction can provide a judicial interpretation to resolve competing views. Ambiguity often arises from drafting inconsistencies or vague phrasing, and without clarity, trustees may face uncertainty about how to administer the trust. A court’s interpretation produces a binding instruction that reduces future disputes. Preparing a petition in such cases involves compiling evidence of the settlor’s likely intent and explaining why the court’s guidance is necessary to implement the trust’s purpose effectively.
Drafting errors, omissions, or inadvertent consequences in the trust instrument can create results that differ from the settlor’s intentions. Reformation petitions ask the court to correct such mistakes so the written instrument reflects what the settlor actually meant to accomplish. Demonstrating the gap between intent and the document often requires contemporaneous evidence, supporting declarations, or other documentation. Courts may reform a trust when the record convincingly shows an error and the requested correction aligns with the settlor’s established goals and the trust’s overall design.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, birth of descendants, significant asset transfers, or changes in beneficiary circumstances can make the existing trust terms impractical or inconsistent with current needs. Administrative clarification or modification ensures that the trust functions as intended under new conditions. When parties disagree or the trust lacks clear amendment procedures, a petition facilitates court review and a solution that balances fairness with the settlor’s objectives. Courts can tailor modifications to address practical administration challenges while preserving the trust’s fundamental purpose.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers assistance to individuals and families in Topanga and throughout Los Angeles County who are considering trust modification petitions. We provide careful assessment of the trust document, discuss available options to resolve disputes or make changes, and explain the benefits and implications of seeking court approval. Our goal is to help clients choose the path that best protects their intentions and minimizes friction among interested parties. Reach out to discuss your situation and learn how to move forward with confidence.
Clients select the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for dependable legal guidance on trust modification petitions because of the firm’s practical approach to resolving complex trust issues. We focus on careful document analysis, clear communication with all parties, and preparation of well-structured petitions. Our legal team works to identify the most efficient route to achieve a durable outcome, whether that involves negotiation, nonjudicial agreement, or court proceedings. We emphasize managing legal and emotional complexities with respect and professionalism while protecting client interests.
Our practice includes detailed preparation of petition documents, coordination of service and notices to interested parties, and advocacy during hearings when court action is necessary. We aim to reduce uncertainty by presenting organized factual and legal support for requested modifications. The firm’s approach is to anticipate likely objections, propose practical solutions, and secure clear resolutions that trustees and beneficiaries can rely upon. We also coordinate with financial and tax advisors when needed to ensure that modifications align with broader estate planning goals.
We recognize that trust modification matters involve sensitive family dynamics and potential conflicts. Our counsel seeks to preserve relationships where possible through constructive negotiation, while being prepared to represent clients at court when required. We provide straightforward explanations of procedures, timelines, and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. By focusing on clear legal strategy, careful documentation, and respectful representation, the firm helps clients reach solutions that reflect the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiary interests over time.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust, identify desired changes, and discuss potential pathways for achieving modification. We gather and analyze documents, prepare necessary petitions and supporting declarations, ensure proper notice to interested parties, and represent clients in hearings. Throughout the process we emphasize clarity, thorough preparation, and timely communication. Our goal is to achieve reliable outcomes that align with the settlor’s intentions while minimizing conflict and administrative disruption.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument and related estate planning documents to determine the nature of the issue and the appropriate remedy. This assessment identifies whether the trust contains amendment powers, whether nonjudicial settlement agreements are viable, and whether a court petition is necessary. We also identify interested parties, gather supporting evidence such as correspondence or records, and map out the likely procedural path. This foundational work ensures petitions are focused, well-supported, and tailored to the specific legal landscape of the case.
Collecting the original trust, any amendments, wills, powers of attorney, asset records, and relevant correspondence is critical to building a persuasive petition. We review these materials to locate ambiguities, errors, or gaps that support modification, and we document the settlor’s intent where possible. Evidence may include communications with the settlor, contemporaneous notes, or records showing the trust’s administration history. Thorough documentation strengthens the petition and provides clarity for the court when evaluating requested changes.
Identifying all interested parties and understanding notice requirements is essential for a valid petition. California law requires proper service to beneficiaries, trustees, and others with standing, ensuring that procedural rights are respected. We prepare notice materials, calculate appropriate deadlines, and manage service in compliance with statutory rules. Proper notice limits the risk of procedural defects that could delay proceedings and ensures that all parties have an opportunity to respond or object, which helps the court reach a fair and enforceable decision.
After the initial assessment and document collection, we draft a petition that clearly articulates the requested modification, the factual basis supporting it, and the legal authorities that justify court relief. The petition includes declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order for the court’s consideration. We file the petition with the appropriate court, manage service of process, and monitor any responses or oppositions. Clear and persuasive petition drafting increases the likelihood of favorable resolution and helps focus issues for possible hearing or negotiated settlement.
Drafting requires careful articulation of the requested changes and thorough presentation of factual evidence. Supporting declarations explain the basis for the petition, referencing documents and witness statements that illuminate the settlor’s intent or the nature of drafting errors. Exhibits such as trust pages, amendments, and related estate planning instruments provide the court with the documentary support needed to evaluate the request. Attention to clarity and evidentiary support helps streamline proceedings and minimizes grounds for successful opposition.
Once filed, the petition must be properly served on interested parties, who then have the opportunity to respond or object. Managing timelines and addressing objections promptly is an important part of the process. We evaluate any oppositions, prepare responsive pleadings or declarations, and explore opportunities for negotiation to narrow contested issues. Strategic responses can reduce the need for extended litigation while preserving the client’s goals, and well-prepared rebuttals support the court’s ability to consider the petition on a solid evidentiary record.
The court will set a hearing to consider the petition, during which parties may present argument, testimony, and evidence. Our preparation focuses on organizing materials, preparing witnesses or declarants, and presenting a persuasive legal and factual narrative to the judge. The court will evaluate the petition against statutory standards and the trust’s context, and it may grant, deny, or alter the requested modification. Following a hearing, the court issues an order reflecting its determination, which becomes the guiding document for trust administration going forward.
Preparing for a hearing includes assembling witness declarations, documentary exhibits, and a clear presentation of the trust’s history and proposed changes. We organize evidence to demonstrate consistency with the settlor’s intent and to address potential objections. Presenting evidence effectively often requires anticipating questions the court might ask and ensuring that testimony and documents are admissible and persuasive. Thorough hearing preparation increases the chances of obtaining an order that implements the desired modifications while withstanding later challenges.
When the court issues an order approving or directing modifications, the trustee and beneficiaries receive clear instructions for implementing the changes. Implementation may include re-titling assets, updating beneficiary designations, or revising administrative procedures to reflect the order. The court’s written decision creates a binding record that trustees can rely on in administering the trust. We assist clients in interpreting the court order and taking the practical steps necessary to put the modification into effect smoothly and in compliance with the judge’s directives.
A trust modification petition is a court filing requesting judicial approval to change, reform, or clarify the terms of an existing trust when other methods of amendment are unavailable or contested. Petitioning the court becomes necessary when the trust lacks an amendment mechanism, when beneficiaries dispute proposed changes, or when a drafting error or ambiguous language prevents straightforward administration. The petition sets out the factual and legal basis for the requested modification and asks the court to issue an order that binds all interested parties. Filing a petition begins a formal process that includes document preparation, notice to interested parties, and potentially a hearing before the court. The judge will evaluate evidence of the settlor’s intent, statutory criteria, and the impact of proposed changes on beneficiaries and trust administration. A court-approved modification provides legal certainty, reduces future disputes, and gives trustees clear instructions on how to carry out the trust under the revised terms.
Yes, beneficiaries may be able to change a trust without court involvement if the trust instrument permits amendments or if all interested parties reach a nonjudicial settlement agreement allowed under California law. When unanimous consent among beneficiaries and proper documentation exist, informal approaches can be faster and less costly than filing a petition. It is important that any agreement is carefully drafted and legally valid so it accomplishes the intended change without leaving openings for future disputes. However, when parties cannot agree, when the trust lacks authority for nonjudicial change, or when the change affects rights that cannot be altered without court approval, filing a petition becomes necessary. A court proceeding ensures formal notice and judicial review, producing an enforceable order that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on for long-term administration.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Los Angeles County varies depending on the complexity of the issues, number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Some uncontested petitions with clear supporting documentation can be resolved in a few months, while contested matters that require evidentiary hearings or extensive discovery may take longer. Court calendars, required notice periods, and responses from opponents all affect the overall duration. Careful preparation can help streamline the process, but clients should anticipate that contested matters will require more time for discovery, briefing, and hearings. Early assessment of procedural requirements and proactive communication with parties help manage expectations about timelines and potential outcomes.
To reform a trust for drafting errors, courts typically require clear evidence demonstrating that the written terms do not reflect the settlor’s actual intent. Such evidence may include contemporaneous correspondence, drafts, declarations from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s wishes, or other documents showing a mistake in the instrument. The petition should clearly identify the discrepancy and propose language that aligns with the settlor’s intent as proven by the available record. Because reformation alters the written document to conform to intent, the court examines the totality of evidence and applies legal standards to ensure that the modification accurately represents the settlor’s objective. Well-organized declarations and exhibits increase the petition’s persuasive force and help the court determine that reformation is warranted under governing law.
A court-modified trust may have tax or retirement plan consequences depending on the nature of the changes. Modifications that affect asset ownership, distribution timing, or beneficiary designations can create tax implications or alter retirement account beneficiary arrangements. It is wise to consider tax consequences when designing a proposed modification and to coordinate with tax or financial advisors as needed to avoid unintended liabilities or inefficiencies. When retirement accounts remain governed by account beneficiary designations outside the trust, modifications to the trust may not change account payout outcomes. Ensuring alignment between trust provisions and account designations often requires separate steps, such as updating beneficiary forms in addition to obtaining court approval for the trust modification.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced through a petition when grounds exist under California law, such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, or an inability to administer the trust effectively. Petitions seeking trustee removal should present evidence supporting the request and propose a suitable successor trustee or plan for administration. Courts consider the best interests of beneficiaries and the trust’s purpose when deciding whether removal is warranted. Alternatives to removal include seeking court instruction to limit trustee powers or negotiating a resignation and successor appointment if the trustee is willing to step down. However, when cooperative solutions are not feasible, a formal petition provides a structured way to address trustee concerns and establish an orderly transition to a new administrator.
Before filing a petition, gather all relevant documents, including the original trust, amendments, related estate planning instruments, asset records, and any correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent. Identify interested parties and attempt to communicate with them about proposed changes. Early document preparation and outreach can sometimes lead to nonjudicial resolutions and narrow contested issues if a petition becomes necessary. Additionally, consider the financial and tax impacts of proposed modifications and consult with financial professionals if changes involve complex assets. Preparing clear factual support, organizing exhibits, and clarifying legal objectives help ensure that a petition is focused and ready for court consideration, improving the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
California law requires proper notice to interested parties when filing a trust modification petition, and the exact forms of notice and timelines depend on the petition type and local court rules. Notice typically involves serving petition documents and relevant exhibits on beneficiaries, trustees, and other parties with a legal interest in the trust. Proof of service must be filed to demonstrate compliance with procedural requirements and to allow parties the opportunity to respond. Failing to provide correct notice can delay proceedings or jeopardize the petition’s effectiveness, so managing service carefully is an important part of the process. Proper notice protects procedural fairness and ensures that all interested parties can participate in or oppose the petition as allowed by law.
If a beneficiary objects to the petition, the objection becomes part of the court record and may lead to a contested hearing where both sides present evidence and legal argument. Objections can raise issues such as disagreement over settlor intent, allegations of impropriety, or competing interpretations of the trust. The court evaluates all submitted evidence and issues a ruling that resolves the contested matters and provides instructions for trust administration. Often, objections create opportunities for negotiation or narrowing of disputed issues before a hearing. Skilled representation seeks to address reasonable concerns and explore settlements that preserve resources and relationships, while also preparing a robust response to objections when settlement is not achievable.
To discuss a trust modification petition in Topanga, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial consultation. During the consultation we will review the trust document, discuss your objectives and concerns, and outline potential legal pathways to achieve the desired modification. We aim to provide practical advice about the likely process, timelines, and alternatives to court involvement when possible. Bringing relevant documents to the consultation expedites the assessment and helps identify whether a petition is necessary. Early communication allows us to explain notice obligations, evidentiary needs, and strategies to accomplish your goals while minimizing conflict and preserving the settlor’s intended outcomes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas