A Heggstad petition can be a vital tool for beneficiaries and trustees seeking to transfer assets properly into or out of a trust after a trustmaker’s death. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition works in California probate and trust administration practice, what courts typically require, and how local procedures in Los Angeles County can affect timing and documentation. We also cover related documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and notices that are commonly involved when assets need to be moved to match the trustmaker’s intent. Call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to discuss your specific situation.
Many families encounter confusion when assets are titled improperly or when a successor trustee needs to clear title to property after a trustmaker passes. A Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that property belongs to the trust despite formal title discrepancies, often avoiding a full probate. In Tujunga and throughout Los Angeles County, understanding the petition process, the required evidence, and potential objections from heirs or creditors helps trustees act confidently. This page outlines practical steps, common challenges, and ways the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with filings, notices, and court hearings tailored to your circumstances.
A Heggstad petition serves several important purposes for trust administration by allowing a court to recognize trust ownership where title paperwork does not clearly reflect the trust. This can prevent lengthy probate, simplify transfers of real property, and protect beneficiaries from disputes over ownership. The process produces a judicial order that clarifies the trustmaker’s intent and authorizes successors to act, including transferring assets, updating records, and closing the trust estate. For trustees in Tujunga, obtaining such an order helps provide legal certainty when dealing with banks, title companies, and county recorder offices that require formal documentation before accepting changes in ownership.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families across California with estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our office helps prepare the necessary forms, assemble supporting declarations and evidence, coordinate title and financial documentation, and file petitions in the appropriate county court. With experience handling revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents like advance health care directives and powers of attorney, we guide trustees and beneficiaries through procedural requirements and hearing preparation. We also assist with guardianship nominations and special needs planning to ensure a comprehensive approach to each client’s estate plan and administration needs.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court order clarifying that specific assets are trust property despite an inconsistency in legal title or transfer paperwork. Common scenarios include assets retained in the decedent’s name, accounts not retitled to the trust, or property that was intended to be transferred but lacked completed formalities. The petition shows that the decedent intended the property for the trust and asks the court to correct records accordingly. Understanding the burden of proof, the type of evidence courts rely on, and potential objections from heirs or creditors is key to planning a successful filing and avoiding delays in administration.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves preparing a clear declaration of the trustee, compiling supporting documents such as the trust instrument and communications showing intent, and providing notice to known interested parties. The court evaluates whether the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property and whether any competing claims exist. In Los Angeles County, local civil and probate rules may affect filing requirements, timelines, and hearing procedures, so careful attention to local practice is important. A well-prepared petition can streamline asset transfer, reduce disputes, and provide official documentation for banks and title companies.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request made to a probate court asking it to determine that certain assets should be treated as trust property. The name comes from a California case that established the framework for such petitions. The petition sets out facts showing that the decedent intended assets to be part of the trust and often includes the trust document, correspondence, and other evidence. If the court agrees, it issues an order permitting the trustee to act on behalf of the trust. That order can be used to update property titles, access accounts, and wind up trust administration without invoking a full probate estate process.
A successful Heggstad petition typically includes a verified petition or declaration from the trustee outlining the trustmaker’s intent, a copy of the trust instrument, proof of the trustmaker’s death, and evidence demonstrating that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. Additional evidence can include beneficiary communications, drafts of estate planning documents, or records showing funding efforts. The petition must be served to notice recipients and filed according to local court rules. The court may set a hearing, consider objections, and then issue an order that clarifies title and authorizes trustee actions to effect the intended transfers.
Below are concise definitions of common terms you will encounter when dealing with Heggstad petitions and trust administration. Understanding these terms helps trustees and beneficiaries prepare the right documents, communicate effectively with the court and title companies, and anticipate objections or evidentiary needs. These definitions are aimed at helping you recognize which documents to gather, how hearings may proceed, and which parties must receive notice. If you need help interpreting any term in your particular case, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for a case-specific discussion.
A Heggstad petition is a petition to the probate court asking it to recognize that property belongs to a trust despite issues with formal title. The petition is used when assets that should have been transferred to a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name or otherwise not properly funded into the trust. It provides a judicial determination that the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust and authorizes the trustee to transfer or manage the asset accordingly. The court order resulting from the petition commonly helps clear title with banks and recorders.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so the trust can hold legal title and provide for distribution under the trust terms. Funding may include retitling real estate, designating the trust as beneficiary on accounts, and assigning personal property. Proper funding prevents many disputes and can reduce the need for court proceedings. When funding is incomplete or overlooked, a Heggstad petition can provide a remedy by demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and obtaining court authority to treat the asset as trust property for administration purposes.
A successor trustee is the individual or entity named in a trust to manage and distribute trust assets after the original trustee or trustmaker can no longer perform those duties. Responsibilities include locating assets, paying debts and expenses, notifying beneficiaries, and filing necessary petitions or accountings. When title discrepancies exist, the successor trustee often files a Heggstad petition to confirm ownership so the trustee can access and transfer assets according to the trust terms. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and to follow the trust instrument and applicable law.
A pour-over will is a will that directs any assets remaining in the decedent’s probate estate to be transferred into the decedent’s previously established trust. This type of will helps ensure that assets unintentionally left out of funding are eventually distributed under the trust terms. While a pour-over will still goes through probate to transfer those assets, it simplifies beneficiary designations and provides a safety net. When property is intended for the trust but remains titled elsewhere, a Heggstad petition can sometimes serve as an alternative remedy to probate for certain assets.
When assets are improperly titled, multiple legal paths exist depending on the nature of the asset and the strength of the evidence that the decedent intended the trust to own it. A Heggstad petition can be a focused remedy to confirm trust ownership, while probate may be necessary when clear title transfers or creditor claims are present. Other options include informal transfers with bank or title company acceptance, beneficiary claims, or quiet title actions in certain situations. Selecting the most appropriate approach requires assessing risk, timing, potential costs, and the likelihood of third-party acceptance without court involvement.
In some circumstances, banks or title companies will accept documentation such as a certification of trust, a death certificate, and a trustee declaration to transfer or retitle accounts and property without a court order. If the institution’s internal procedures are satisfied by those documents and there are no anticipated disputes from heirs or creditors, an informal transfer may resolve the issue more quickly and with lower cost. Trustees should ensure that the documentation meets the institution’s requirements and that notice obligations to beneficiaries are observed to reduce the risk of later challenges.
When there is little chance that heirs or creditors will object—perhaps due to clear beneficiary designations, minimal estate value, or an amicable family situation—pursuing informal administrative solutions may be appropriate. In such cases, a trustee might secure necessary items like a certification of trust and proceed with title transfers. However, trustees should remain mindful of statutory notice requirements and the potential consequences of failing to obtain judicial approval where it is advisable. Consulting with legal counsel helps evaluate whether an informal route is appropriate for the specific facts.
When title issues are complex or when there are creditor claims, contested beneficiary rights, or ambiguous trust terms, filing a Heggstad petition and pursuing court approval can provide a more secure resolution. A judicial determination reduces the risk of future litigation over ownership and gives trustees a formal order to present to title companies, banks, and other institutions. This path is often recommended when the cost of potential disputes or the value of assets justifies the time and expense of court involvement to achieve legal certainty and to ensure proper administration under California law.
Complex matters may involve assets located in different counties or states, or procedural requirements that differ between local courts and institutions. When filings must comply with specific Los Angeles County probate rules, recorder requirements, or federal regulations for certain accounts, obtaining legal support to prepare and prosecute a petition helps ensure compliance and avoid inadvertent errors. Comprehensive legal assistance includes preparing declarations, serving notices correctly, scheduling hearings, and responding to objections, all of which reduce the likelihood of delays and adverse rulings.
A comprehensive approach to trust administration and Heggstad petitions offers multiple benefits: formal court recognition of trust ownership, clearer title for future transfers, potential avoidance of later disputes, and an authoritative record for institutions that require judicial orders. This approach helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties with documented steps and reduces uncertainty for beneficiaries. It also creates a structured path for addressing creditor notices, competing claims, and administrative complexities so that asset distribution proceeds in line with the trustmaker’s intent while conforming to applicable law and local court practices.
Comprehensive handling includes detailed review of the trust instrument and related estate planning documents like pour-over wills, power of attorney, and health care directives, ensuring all pieces work together. It means preparing accurate petitions, assembling credible declarations, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting the case at hearing if necessary. That thoroughness minimizes the chance of future litigation or title rejection and assists institutions in accepting trustee actions. Ultimately, it helps families complete the administrative steps required to settle affairs and move forward with confidence.
A primary benefit of pursuing a comprehensive Heggstad petition is obtaining a court order that clarifies legal ownership, which third parties respect. That certainty streamlines the process of retitling property, transferring bank or investment accounts, and resolving registration issues with county recorders. Clear title reduces the risk of claims by creditors or heirs and provides trustees with documented authority to act, which is especially important for significant assets such as real estate or retirement accounts that require formal documentation before institutions will accept changes.
By securing judicial confirmation through a petition, trustees lower the chance that beneficiaries or third parties will later challenge a transfer. A court order resolves contested questions and records findings that can be relied upon in future disputes. This proactive measure often prevents time-consuming and costly litigation down the road. Where assets are valuable or relationships among heirs are strained, pursuing a robust, court-based solution provides a durable legal foundation for administering and distributing trust property in accordance with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Start by compiling the trust instrument, death certificate, account statements, correspondence indicating the trustmaker’s intent, and any assignments or transfer documents related to the asset. Having a thorough set of supporting documents before filing helps the court evaluate your petition efficiently and reduces the need for follow-up filings. Also collect evidence of attempts to retitle assets and any institutional communications that clarify why a court order may be necessary. Early preparation saves time and improves the chances of a straightforward hearing and order.
If there are signs of potential disputes, creditor claims, or ambiguous ownership records, pursue a petition to secure a formal court order rather than relying on informal institutional approvals. A judicial order provides a stronger basis for changing title and resolving contestable claims, and it may be the only way to obtain acceptance from certain institutions. Evaluate the cost-benefit of court involvement in light of asset value and dispute risk, and prepare to document the trustmaker’s intent thoroughly for a durable resolution.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in a decedent’s name, when institutions refuse to accept trust documentation alone, or when there is a reasonable risk of contested claims. The petition provides judicial recognition of trust ownership, which helps trustees access accounts, retitle property, and carry out distributions according to the trust. For families facing complex title issues, the petition can bring clarity and closure, preserving the trustmaker’s wishes and avoiding extended administrative delays that hinder beneficiaries from receiving their intended shares.
You should also consider this service if you are a successor trustee encountering banks or title companies that demand court orders, or if heirs are unsure about the trustmaker’s intentions. A petition helps manage creditor concern and diminishes the potential for later litigation by creating a public record confirming the trust’s ownership. Whether the matter involves real estate, investment accounts, or personal property, a Heggstad petition can be an effective step to ensure assets are treated in accordance with the trust and to facilitate a smooth administration process.
Typical circumstances calling for a Heggstad petition include real property left in the decedent’s individual name, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled to the trust, assets with unclear beneficiary designations, or cases where title companies will not accept a certification of trust alone. Situations involving out-of-state property or complicated account ownership can also benefit from a court order. When evidence supports that the asset was intended for the trust but formalities were not completed, a petition offers a focused remedy to align title with the trustmaker’s plan.
When real property remains recorded in the decedent’s name rather than the trust, title companies often require a court order to transfer the deed. Filing a Heggstad petition in such cases helps produce the documented authority needed to retitle the property into the trust or to effect a sale. This is a common issue when the trustmaker did not complete a grant deed transfer prior to death or when clerical oversights occurred. A petition clarifies the trustmaker’s intent and authorizes the successor trustee to take necessary actions regarding the property.
Brokerage and bank accounts that were not changed to reflect trust ownership can prevent trustees from accessing funds needed to pay debts, taxes, or distributions. Institutions may accept trustee affidavits for small accounts, but for larger or more complex accounts they may insist on a court order. A Heggstad petition presents evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and asks the court to confirm the trustee’s power to manage or distribute that property. Obtaining such confirmation can resolve institutional hesitancy and expedite administration.
If beneficiaries disagree about whether certain property belongs to the trust or if third parties assert claims, a Heggstad petition can produce an authoritative court ruling. The petition process allows interested parties to be notified and to raise objections, which the court then evaluates. Resolving disputes through the court avoids continued uncertainty and helps trustees act with formal authorization. In contentious situations, a judicial determination often protects the trustee from later allegations of mismanagement or improper distribution.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists trustees and beneficiaries in Tujunga and throughout Los Angeles County with Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related estate planning matters. Whether you need guidance assembling evidence, preparing declarations, complying with local court rules, or presenting the matter at hearing, we provide practical assistance tailored to the local process. Our team can help coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and county recorders to secure the outcomes needed to transfer assets and complete administration efficiently and with attention to minimizing risk.
Clients work with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we focus on clear communication, careful preparation, and practical solutions for trust administration issues. We prioritize assembling comprehensive documentation, observing notice requirements, and presenting petitions in a compelling, organized manner so the court and third parties can act efficiently. Our approach is to reduce friction with institutions and potential objectors while making sure trustee duties are fulfilled and beneficiaries’ interests are respected throughout the process.
We assist with preparing all necessary filings, coordinating service on interested parties, responding to objections if they arise, and working with title companies and banks to effect transfers once an order is obtained. For trustees facing complex asset portfolios, multiple jurisdictions, or anticipated creditor issues, our practice offers thorough preparation designed to limit delays and prevent procedural missteps. We also provide guidance on related documents such as certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and power of attorney matters that often accompany trust administration.
Every matter receives individualized attention so that petitions reflect the facts and supporting evidence essential for a favorable outcome. We help trustees understand their responsibilities, prepare the required declarations, and navigate judicial hearings when needed. Whether the case is straightforward or involves contested claims, our firm’s process emphasizes clarity, documentation, and compliance with local probate rules, helping clients achieve a reliable resolution for title and transfer issues.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents, asset records, and any communications that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. We then identify the assets requiring a petition, gather supporting evidence, prepare the verified petition or declaration, and ensure proper notice to interested parties in accordance with probate rules. If a hearing is set, we prepare declarations and evidentiary exhibits and represent the trustee at the hearing. After an order issues, we assist in presenting the order to title companies, banks, and recorders to complete needed retitling and transfers.
The initial phase focuses on understanding the facts, identifying assets affected by funding issues, and collecting documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any relevant correspondence. We evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy or if alternative administrative steps can resolve the issue more efficiently. Determining potential notice recipients and assessing the likelihood of objections help shape the strategic plan and timeline for the filing and resolution of the matter.
We carefully analyze the trust language to confirm the trustee’s powers and the trustmaker’s intent regarding specific assets. This review includes checking schedules of assets, prior transfers, and any documents indicating intent to fund the trust. Detailed scrutiny helps identify gaps in funding and prepares the factual narrative that supports the petition. Gathering coherent, organized evidence at this stage significantly improves efficiency when drafting the petition and reduces the need for supplemental filings or clarifications later in the process.
After identifying the assets in question, we compile declarations, death certificates, account statements, and communications that demonstrate the asset was intended for the trust. We also prepare required notices to beneficiaries and other interested parties and determine proper methods of service under local rules. Properly executed notices and organized evidence are essential for a smooth filing and increase the chance that the court will grant the requested relief without unnecessary delay or challenge.
In this stage we draft the Heggstad petition or verified declaration, incorporating the assembled evidence and legal justification for treating the asset as trust property. We ensure the petition complies with local probate rules, prepare proof of service documents, and file the matter with the appropriate court. Attention to procedural detail—such as proper captioning, correct service lists, and timely filing—is critical to avoid procedural defects that could delay the hearing or open the filing to challenge.
We draft a clear, concise verified petition that sets out the factual basis for the requested relief and attaches the trust, death certificate, and other documents as exhibits. Declarations from the trustee or relevant witnesses help establish the trustmaker’s intent. Exhibits are organized to allow the court to see the chain of events and the rationale for treating the asset as trust property. Well-structured filings minimize the need for additional briefing and facilitate the court’s review.
We file the petition with the probate department in the appropriate county and serve copies on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties as required. Proof of service is prepared and filed to document compliance with notice rules. If objections arise, we evaluate them and prepare responses or stipulations to resolve disputes. Proper service and documentation maintain the integrity of the proceeding and help the court reach a timely decision on the petition.
If the court sets a hearing, we present the evidence and arguments supporting the petition, addressing any objections and providing clarifying declarations as needed. Once the court issues an order confirming the asset as trust property, we assist the trustee in presenting the order to title companies, banks, or recorders and completing required retitling or transfers. We also prepare any follow-up filings or notifications necessary to finish administration and help trustees document the completion of required tasks.
At the hearing, we explain the documentary and testimonial evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent and why the court should recognize the asset as belonging to the trust. We address objections by clarifying facts, submitting additional documentation if necessary, and proposing reasonable orders that reflect the trust terms. Our goal is to secure an order that the trustee can use with third parties to complete asset transfers, while protecting the rights of beneficiaries and honoring statutory notice and procedural requirements.
After obtaining the court order, we coordinate the practical steps needed to present the order to banks, brokerage firms, and county recorders to retitle assets or authorize transfers. We help prepare any additional documents those institutions require, such as certified copies of the order, trustee certifications, and updated account documentation. Ensuring that institutions accept and act on the court order is essential to completing trust administration and allowing beneficiaries to receive their distributions as intended.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize that specific property should be treated as trust property despite defects or inconsistencies in formal title. It is commonly used when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name, when transfers were incomplete, or when institutions demand judicial confirmation before accepting a change in ownership. The petition provides a judicial finding that clarifies the trustmaker’s intent and authorizes the trustee to take appropriate actions to manage or transfer the asset. The petition relies on documentary and testimonial evidence to show that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. Courts consider the trust instrument, communications, efforts to fund the trust, and other relevant facts. If the court is satisfied, it issues an order allowing the trustee to proceed, which banks and title companies often accept when changing titles or releasing funds. The petition is a focused remedy that can avoid a broader probate in many cases.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on local court schedules, the complexity of the evidence, and whether there are objections from interested parties. In relatively straightforward matters with no opposition, a petition can be prepared and heard within a few weeks to a few months, depending on the court’s calendar. Preparing thorough documentation and following local probate filing rules helps prevent delays and reduces the chance of additional motions or supplemental filings. If objections arise or additional evidence is needed, the process can take longer as hearings may be continued and further briefing may be required. Matters involving out-of-state assets, disputed ownership claims, or contested beneficiary rights often require more time to resolve. Early assessment and careful preparation improve the likelihood of a timely resolution and help manage expectations about the schedule.
Evidence to support a Heggstad petition commonly includes a copy of the trust instrument, the decedent’s death certificate, account or title statements showing the asset, and declarations from the successor trustee explaining the basis for the claim. Additional supportive items may include correspondence, drafts of estate planning documents, or proof of attempts to retitle assets before the trustmaker’s death. These items together create a factual narrative showing the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Courts evaluate the credibility and sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. The more cohesive and documentary the evidence, the better the likelihood the court will grant the petition. Organizing exhibits logically and preparing clear declarations that link facts to the trust terms helps the court understand and rule on the request.
A Heggstad petition can sometimes avoid the need for full probate by resolving title issues through a focused court order. If assets are properly determined to be trust property, they can be administered under the trust without transferring through probate. However, if assets have no clear evidence of trust funding or if there are creditor claims and other estate issues, probate may still be necessary to distribute the decedent’s estate assets properly. The decision to pursue a petition instead of probate depends on the nature of the assets, the evidence available, and potential objections. In many cases a petition is an efficient alternative, but trustees should evaluate the specifics of each situation to determine whether a petition or probate is the more appropriate path forward.
Notice requirements vary by jurisdiction, but generally beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors must receive notice of the petition so they have an opportunity to object. Proper service and proof of notice are important procedural steps that support the court’s ability to consider the petition and prevent later challenges based on inadequate notice. Courts expect clear documentation showing that required parties were informed according to applicable probate rules. Failing to provide proper notice can result in delays or the need for re-service. Trustees should identify all interested parties early in the process, prepare accurate service lists, and follow local rules for methods and timelines for service. Proper notice helps protect both the trustee and the integrity of the court proceeding.
Accounts with beneficiary designations typically pass outside of the trust according to the designation, so a Heggstad petition is not usually necessary for those assets. If an account was intended to be controlled by the trust but retains a different beneficiary designation or the designation is ambiguous, a court may need to resolve where the account should be directed. In such cases, clarifying documents and evidence of intent are essential to present to the court. When beneficiary designations and trust intentions conflict, the trustee should review account agreements and beneficiary forms and consult with counsel to determine the best course. If the institution refuses to follow the trustmaker’s intent without a court order, a petition can be a way to request judicial resolution and ensure assets are distributed as planned.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and evaluate the competing evidence. Objections often raise issues about whether the decedent actually intended the asset to be part of the trust, the sufficiency of supporting documents, or creditor concerns. The court may continue the hearing to allow supplemental evidence or may require additional briefing from the parties before issuing a decision. Resolving objections may involve demonstrating stronger documentary proof, negotiating a stipulation, or addressing creditor claims through appropriate notices and procedures. Trustees and beneficiaries should be prepared to provide clear factual support for the petition and consider settlement options if disputes arise to minimize time and cost.
A court order confirming trust ownership is generally persuasive to banks, title companies, and county recorders, and it often resolves institutional reluctance to change title. Title companies in particular rely on recorded judgments and orders to clear titles, and banks accept judicial orders as authorization for trustees to access or transfer accounts. After a court order issues, trustees can present certified copies and follow each institution’s procedures to complete required changes. Occasionally, institutions may request additional documentation or specific forms, so coordination with counsel to prepare the exact paperwork requested improves acceptance. If an institution continues to resist, certified orders and documented compliance with the court’s directions provide strong legal grounds to compel compliance or seek enforcement.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on court filing fees, the complexity of the factual record, and whether contested hearings are necessary. Filing fees are set by county courts and additional costs may include service of process, certification of documents, title company fees, and attorney fees for drafting documents and appearing at hearings. Simple, uncontested petitions are generally less expensive because they require less time and fewer court appearances. Contested matters, multiple objections, or cases that require substantial evidence gathering and multiple filings will increase costs. Early case assessment and thorough preparation often reduce total expense by minimizing the need for repeated hearings and supplemental filings. Discussing the expected scope and a fee structure with counsel early in the process helps plan for reasonable cost management.
A trustee may represent themselves for limited administrative tasks and filings, but representing oneself at a contested Heggstad petition hearing can be challenging due to procedural rules and evidentiary requirements. Courts expect petitions to comply with local probate formatting, notice, and proof of service rules. Complex legal arguments and objections from interested parties may also arise, making representation by counsel advisable to ensure proper preparation and presentation before the court. When matters are straightforward and uncontested, self-representation may be feasible if the trustee is comfortable preparing filings and navigating court procedures. However, where disputes, creditor issues, or complicated evidentiary questions exist, having legal assistance improves the likelihood of an efficient and favorable resolution and reduces the risk of procedural missteps.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas