A trust modification petition lets a settlor, beneficiary, or trustee request a court-approved change to an existing trust when circumstances, intent, or law require an adjustment. In Universal City and across Los Angeles County, trust modification work often arises when changes in family structure, tax law, assets, or incapacity make the original trust terms impractical. This page explains the legal basis for petitions, who can file, what documentation courts expect, and how the process typically unfolds. Our focus is on helping individuals and families understand options so they can pursue a modification that reflects current circumstances and long-term planning goals.
Trust modification petitions can address a wide range of matters including ambiguous language, changed asset composition, changes in beneficiaries’ needs, removal or substitution of trustees, or adjustments to address tax consequences. The specific path to modification depends on the trust instrument, whether all interested parties agree, and applicable California law. When parties are willing, informal settlement or stipulated modification can avoid contentious litigation. When disputes arise, courts weigh settlor intent, beneficiary rights, and the trust instrument’s language. This guide outlines how to evaluate whether a petition is appropriate and what to expect from the process in Universal City and nearby jurisdictions.
A trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s original goals while adapting to new realities, protecting beneficiaries’ interests and preventing unintended results. Modifications can reduce future conflicts, clarify ambiguous provisions, and realign trustee powers to meet current needs. In many cases, pursuing a formal petition promotes certainty and reduces the risk of later successful challenges. For families facing changed circumstances, a carefully drafted petition helps maintain asset protection, tax planning objectives, and continuity in administration of the trust. Understanding potential benefits and trade-offs helps people make informed decisions about whether to pursue modification now or defer action.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in California with a focus on trust and estate matters, including trust modification petitions, trust administration, and related proceedings. Our attorneys work to analyze trust instruments, communicate with affected parties, and present clear, persuasive petitions to the court when modification is needed. We emphasize practical solutions that aim to reduce expense and delay, including negotiating stipulated agreements when all parties are willing to cooperate. For those in Universal City and Los Angeles County, the firm provides hands-on guidance from initial analysis through court filings, hearings, and post-order implementation of modified trust terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing asking a judge to alter the terms of a trust. Under California law, petitions can be based on settlor intent, changed circumstances, mistake, or the need to effectuate tax or administrative changes. The procedure varies depending on whether the settlor is alive and competent, whether all beneficiaries consent, and whether the trust instrument contains specific amendment or modification provisions. Filing a petition involves drafting a clear statement of the requested changes, documenting facts that justify the modification, and identifying all interested parties. Preparing a complete record helps the court decide whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and policy considerations.
When parties agree to a modification, a stipulated settlement can be presented to the court for approval and entry of an amended order, which tends to be faster and less costly. When parties disagree, judges evaluate evidence, trust language, and legal standards such as whether the modification corrects a mistake or is necessary to effectuate the settlor’s probable intent. Courts are mindful of protecting beneficiaries’ rights while honoring the settlor’s wishes. Understanding the procedural steps, potential timelines, and likely outcomes in your county helps set realistic expectations and enables better preparation for hearings or negotiations.
A trust modification petition formally requests that a court change one or more provisions of a trust. Typical grounds include a mistake in the original instrument, changed circumstances that make the original terms unworkable, or clarification of ambiguous language. A petition may also seek to amend trustee powers, add a pour-over mechanism, or alter distribution terms when beneficiaries’ needs have changed significantly. The court examines the trust document, evidence of settlor intent, and any objections from interested parties. Successful petitions result in an order that legally amends the trust, ensuring the trustee administers the trust consistent with the court-approved changes.
Preparing a trust modification petition involves identifying the specific provisions to change, assembling evidence such as declarations and supporting documents, and notifying all interested parties under California probate rules. The petitioner must demonstrate why modification is warranted, whether by consent or judicial determination. Negotiation and mediation are often used to reach agreements before trial. If the case proceeds, the court will hold hearings where witnesses or declarations explain the reasons for modification. After a court order, the trustee implements changes and updates trust records. Accurate drafting and thorough notice help reduce the risk of appeals or future disputes.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate the modification process and communicate effectively with counsel and the court. This glossary defines frequently used words such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, and pour-over will, and explains how each relates to modification proceedings. Clear definitions make it easier to evaluate the legal standards that courts apply and the documentation required for filings. Familiarity with these terms supports informed decision-making during settlement talks, court hearings, and implementation of any approved changes to a trust.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and funded it with assets. The settlor’s original intent and any retained powers to amend or revoke the trust are central to modification petitions. If the settlor is alive and retains amendment powers, modification may be achieved without court involvement by executing a proper amendment per the trust’s terms. When the settlor is deceased or lacks authority, beneficiaries or trustees may petition the court to modify the trust to reflect what the settlor would have intended or to resolve issues that prevent effective administration.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust terms. Trustees play a role in modification proceedings when they need court guidance about how to interpret or implement trust provisions, or when they seek to replace, remove, or clarify their powers. Courts may approve modifications that alter trustee responsibilities or grant new authorities to address administration challenges. Trustees must provide beneficiaries with required notices and act in the best interests of the trust when considering or responding to modification petitions.
Beneficiaries are those who have rights under the trust to receive distributions or to enforce trust terms. When a modification petition is filed, beneficiaries must typically be notified and may consent, object, or request changes. Courts consider beneficiaries’ interests when deciding whether to approve modifications, particularly if changes affect distribution timing, amounts, or conditions. In many cases, reaching agreement among beneficiaries simplifies the process and allows a stipulated modification to be entered more quickly than a contested action.
A pour-over will works with a trust by directing assets not previously placed into the trust to be transferred into it upon the settlor’s death. In trust modification work, pour-over wills may be revised or implemented to ensure that newly discovered assets or assets omitted from funding are properly captured by the trust. Modifications can clarify how pour-over provisions operate or adjust testamentary language to coordinate with amended trust terms so that intended distributions occur smoothly after death.
When considering changes to a trust, people can pursue informal amendments if the trust instrument allows, negotiated stipulations among all interested parties, or a formal court petition. Informal amendments are quick but only possible when the trust grants amendment powers and the settlor is capable. Stipulated modifications are effective when beneficiaries and trustees agree, and a court can then approve the agreed changes. Contested petitions are necessary when parties disagree or legal authority is unclear. Each route has trade-offs in terms of cost, time, certainty, and the likelihood of future challenges; selecting the right option depends on the specific facts and relationships involved.
If the settlor is still alive and the trust instrument explicitly grants the settlor the ability to amend or revoke the trust, a nonjudicial amendment or restatement may be appropriate. This path avoids court proceedings and allows the settlor to directly update provisions, appoint new trustees, or change distribution terms. Even when a simple amendment is possible, it should be executed formally and in compliance with trust requirements to ensure validity. Proper documentation and, where appropriate, funding updates help prevent future disputes over the trust’s current terms and administration.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to specific, documented changes, they can often present a stipulated agreement to the court for approval or, in some cases, enter into a private settlement that modifies administration without litigation. This cooperative approach reduces expense, shortens timelines, and preserves family relationships. It’s important for parties to confirm that any agreement fully addresses tax, creditor, and procedural concerns, and that the resulting modification is clearly stated so trustees can implement the changes without ambiguity or unintended consequences.
When trust provisions are complex, inconsistent, or conflict with wills, retirement plan beneficiary designations, or other documents, a measured legal approach is important to coordinate all instruments. Courts will consider the whole record when evaluating petitions, and careful legal analysis helps avoid unintended consequences such as asset misallocation, tax exposure, or disputes over settlor intent. Addressing these issues thoroughly often requires reviewing related documents, obtaining valuations, and preparing clear evidence to show why the modification will produce results aligned with the settlor’s objectives.
In contested matters or when significant assets and important family interests are at stake, a comprehensive legal approach helps protect the rights of trustees and beneficiaries and establishes persuasive arguments for the court. Litigation often demands rigorous factual development, strategic pleadings, and skilled negotiation. Preparing for potential objections, defending trustee actions, and documenting the necessity of changes reduces the likelihood of appeals and long-term uncertainty. Engaging counsel early supports effective case planning and increases the chances of a favorable court outcome or a workable settlement.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification balances legal thoroughness with practical goals such as minimizing delays and protecting family relationships. Well-prepared petitions present clear evidence of the rationale for change, reducing the court’s need for extensive fact-finding and making it easier to obtain an order that accurately reflects intended results. When parties negotiate informed settlements, they preserve goodwill and avoid protracted litigation. Properly documented modifications also reduce the risk of future challenges by creating a transparent record of the reasons for change and the agreement of interested parties when applicable.
Comprehensive handling addresses collateral matters like tax implications, creditor considerations, and coordination with related estate documents to ensure that a modification does not unintentionally create new problems. Attention to procedure, notice, and record-keeping supports enforceability and smooth administration by trustees. This prevents confusion about distribution timing and trustee duties and helps beneficiaries receive intended benefits in an orderly way. Overall, combining strategic planning with careful documentation enhances predictability and protects the trust’s long-term purpose.
One significant advantage of a careful modification process is the clarity it provides for trustees and beneficiaries, which lowers the chance of future disagreements. Clear orders and revised trust documents create a straightforward roadmap for administration, limiting interpretive disputes and providing courts with a well-documented basis for the change. This clarity supports effective trust management, faster distributions where appropriate, and a lower likelihood of expensive, protracted litigation that can erode trust assets and family relationships over time.
A comprehensive approach helps preserve the settlor’s broader estate planning goals by ensuring modifications align with tax planning, guardianship nominations, and other legacy decisions. Thoughtful coordination with wills, powers of attorney, and trust funding documents prevents unintended gaps or overlaps in asset distribution. This attention to detail protects beneficiaries’ interests and maintains the settlor’s intended balance among financial security, asset protection, and personal wishes for care and distribution after incapacity or death.
Start by collecting all trust documents, related wills, beneficiary designations, recent account statements, and any correspondence that explains the settlor’s intent. Early document gathering reduces delays and helps identify conflicts between instruments that may require court consideration. Assembling a clear chronology of events and transactions provides context for why modifications are proposed. This preparation improves the quality of declarations and exhibits filed with the petition, making it easier for a judge or negotiating parties to understand the factual basis for the requested changes and to move toward resolution.
Evaluate the tax implications of any proposed trust changes and confirm that assets are properly titled to reflect the modification once approved. Changes that affect income tax treatment, generation-skipping transfer tax, or retirement plan designations deserve careful review. Make sure that funding gaps are addressed so assets flow consistent with amended terms. Coordinating with financial and tax advisors ensures that the modification accomplishes estate planning goals without creating unintended liabilities or administrative hurdles for trustees and beneficiaries.
People consider trust modification petitions for many reasons: family dynamics change, beneficiaries’ needs evolve, assets previously excluded are discovered, or the trust’s terms produce unintended tax consequences. A petition can reconcile discrepancies between the settlor’s current intent and the trust’s written language, address trustee authority issues, or adapt distribution schedules to meet beneficiaries’ changing circumstances. Whether the goal is to clarify administration, remove barriers to distribution, or respond to legal changes, a petition provides a legal mechanism to align the trust with current realities while seeking court approval where necessary.
Another common reason to modify a trust is to update trustee appointments or powers to reflect changes in capacity, location, or willingness to serve. Petitioning the court to replace a trustee or to define successor procedures can prevent administrative bottlenecks and ensure fiduciary duties are carried out. Additionally, modifications may be needed to integrate new estate planning elements such as irrevocable life insurance trusts, special needs provisions, or pet trusts, thereby preserving intended protections and benefits for those named in the plan.
Frequent circumstances prompting petitions include remarriage, divorce of beneficiaries, births or deaths that change family composition, discovery of omitted assets, trustee incapacity or misconduct, and changes in tax law that affect distribution strategies. Other triggers include ambiguous trust drafting, outdated provisions that no longer reflect modern family structures, or the need to add provisions for a beneficiary with special needs. Understanding which situation applies helps determine whether a informal amendment, stipulated modification, or contested petition is the appropriate course of action.
When family circumstances change significantly—such as through marriage, divorce, birth of children, or death—trust terms that once fit may no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions. Modifying the trust can adjust beneficiary shares, revise guardianship or care provisions, or add language to protect new family members. Addressing these changes promptly helps avoid confusion and potential litigation, ensuring that administration proceeds according to updated family priorities and the settlor’s values.
If a trustee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, or if actions raise concerns about proper administration, parties may petition the court to remove or replace the trustee or to clarify the trustee’s powers. Court supervision can also provide directions on recordkeeping, accountings, and steps needed to secure and manage trust assets. These proceedings help safeguard beneficiaries’ interests and allow the trust to continue functioning as intended with minimal disruption.
Drafting mistakes, omissions, or ambiguous language in a trust can result in unintended outcomes or disputes over interpretation. A modification petition can correct scrivener errors, clarify unclear provisions, or address inconsistencies between the trust and related instruments. Courts review objective evidence of the settlor’s intent and the surrounding circumstances to determine appropriate remedies. Fully documenting the reasons for correction and presenting clear evidence supports a successful petition and reduces the likelihood of later challenges.
If you are in Universal City or Los Angeles County and considering a trust modification petition, local counsel can help evaluate options, prepare petitions, and coordinate notice and filings with the appropriate probate court. Support includes reviewing your trust and related documents, identifying necessary parties, drafting pleadings and declarations, and negotiating with other interested parties to seek a stipulated resolution when possible. Having a local presence helps ensure filings comply with county procedures and timelines so your petition proceeds efficiently through the judicial process.
Clients select Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we combine deep knowledge of trust and probate practice with a practical approach to resolving disputes and implementing changes. We focus on clear communication and thorough preparation to reduce uncertainty and expense, and we aim to preserve relationships where possible through mediated solutions. Our attorneys work closely with clients to understand intentions and goals, then craft petition strategies that align legal options with family and financial realities in California courts.
We manage the full process, including gathering supporting documents, coordinating notices, preparing declarations and exhibits, and representing client interests at hearings. For cases that can be resolved by agreement, we negotiate comprehensive settlements and present stipulated modifications for the court’s approval. For contested matters, we pursue a focused litigation strategy emphasizing factual clarity, procedural compliance, and measured advocacy to obtain favorable rulings while controlling costs and timelines to the extent possible.
Throughout every matter, we keep clients informed about realistic options and possible outcomes so they can make informed decisions. We also coordinate with tax and financial professionals when needed to address implications of proposed changes and ensure that post-order implementation, such as retitling assets or updating beneficiary designations, proceeds smoothly for trustees and beneficiaries across Universal City and surrounding areas.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related estate planning documents to identify the issues and possible routes to resolution. We then advise on whether an informal amendment, stipulated modification, or court petition is the most effective path. If a petition is needed, we prepare detailed pleadings, gather supporting declarations and exhibits, and handle statutory notices to all interested parties. We pursue negotiated resolutions when possible and prepare for contested hearings when necessary, aiming to secure a clear, enforceable order that allows trustees to administer the trust as intended.
The first step involves a comprehensive intake and document review to understand the trust’s terms, related instruments, and the factual basis for requesting a change. We identify interested parties, assess potential objections, and determine the evidentiary support needed for court filings. This stage includes discussing client goals, exploring settlement options, and advising on timelines and likely costs. A careful initial evaluation sets the stage for focused drafting and helps avoid unnecessary filings or delays during the court process.
Collecting evidence such as declarations from witnesses, correspondence, financial records, and documents demonstrating changed circumstances strengthens a petition. Detailed exhibits that explain the reasons for a modification help judges understand the context and rationale. We assist clients in identifying and organizing this material so filings present a clear factual narrative. A compelling evidentiary presentation often facilitates negotiated solutions or a more straightforward judicial decision.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is essential under California probate procedure. We prepare and serve the required notices, file proof of service, and coordinate any requests for additional time or alternative service methods. Ensuring notice compliance reduces the risk of procedural challenges and supports the court’s ability to consider the petition on the merits without delay.
After preparing pleadings and supporting materials, we file the petition with the appropriate probate court in Los Angeles County and schedule hearings as required. We continue to engage with other parties to explore stipulations or mediated agreements that can resolve the matter efficiently. When negotiations succeed, we prepare stipulated modification orders for the court. If disputes persist, we proceed with motions and evidence presentation at hearing to advocate for the requested changes to the trust.
Mediation or facilitated settlement discussions can resolve contested matters without a full trial. We prepare negotiation positions supported by evidence and work to identify trade-offs that meet the core interests of parties while preserving estate planning goals. Successful mediated agreements are often memorialized as stipulated modifications and presented to the court for approval, saving time and expense and reducing the emotional toll of litigation.
When a hearing is necessary, we present declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments to the judge to support the requested changes. The court evaluates whether the modification aligns with statutory standards and the settlor’s probable intent. If the judge grants the petition or approves a stipulation, an order is entered that legally amends the trust. We then help implement the order by preparing revised trust documents and advising trustees on next steps for administration and record-keeping.
Once the court enters an order approving a modification, the trustee must update trust records, retitle assets if necessary, and follow the revised distribution directions. We assist with preparing amended trust documents, certifications of trust for financial institutions, and notices to beneficiaries about the change. Ensuring that assets are correctly transferred and that trustees understand new duties reduces the risk of administrative errors and fosters smooth ongoing management of the trust according to the court-approved modification.
After a modification, trustees often need to retitle assets, present the court order to financial institutions, and provide updated certification of trust documentation. We prepare the necessary forms and coordinate interactions with banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to ensure assets align with the modified trust terms. Proper post-order steps protect beneficiaries and allow trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the new directives without confusion.
Trustees must continue to keep accurate records, provide required accountings when necessary, and communicate with beneficiaries about the status of administration. We advise trustees on compliance with the court order, recordkeeping practices, and how to handle distribution requests consistent with amended terms. Transparent communication and diligent administration help maintain beneficiary trust and prevent future contests over the implementation of the modified trust.
Beneficiaries, trustees, or other interested parties may file a trust modification petition in California depending on the circumstances, and sometimes a settlor can effect changes without court involvement if the trust reserves amendment power. Courts typically allow petitions when there is a demonstrated need to correct a mistake, clarify intent, or address changed circumstances that make the trust’s provisions unworkable. The exact standing rules depend on the trust document and state law, and identifying the correct petitioner is an important early step in the process. Before filing, it helps to confirm that all interested parties are properly identified and notified. In some situations, a trustee might petition for instructions, or beneficiaries may seek modification if the settlor is unavailable to act. Proper notice and compliance with probate rules are essential to avoid procedural defects that could delay court consideration or prompt challenges to the proceeding’s validity.
A court petition becomes necessary when the settlor lacks authority to amend the trust, when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the proposed change, or when the requested modification involves judicial interpretation of ambiguous language. If all parties agree and the trust permits nonjudicial amendment, an informal amendment or stipulated modification can be faster and less costly. However, when parties are not unanimous or the legal basis for change is unclear, a petition provides a definitive, enforceable resolution through the court. Even when a nonjudicial route is available, courts sometimes recommend or require court involvement to protect the rights of unknown or missing beneficiaries, safeguard against creditor claims, or resolve disputes over trustee actions. Assessing whether the matter should go to court depends on risk factors such as contested interests, significant assets, and potential tax or creditor consequences, so careful evaluation at the outset helps choose the best path.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on complexity, the court’s calendar, and whether parties reach a settlement. Simple stipulated modifications may be resolved within a few weeks to a few months, while contested petitions can take several months to over a year. Procedural requirements such as notice periods, time for responses, discovery, and scheduling hearings all influence timing. Preparing complete filings and engaging in early settlement talks can shorten the process. Contested matters that require evidentiary hearings or extensive briefing will generally take longer. Courts prioritize cases according to local rules and caseloads, and delays can occur if additional documentation or clarification is requested. Planning for potential timelines and keeping communication open with opposing parties are practical steps to manage expectations and reduce avoidable delays.
Courts consider the trust instrument, declarations or testimony about the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous documents, and evidence of changed circumstances or mistakes in the original drafting. Judges evaluate whether the proposed modification aligns with what the settlor likely intended and whether it is consistent with public policy and statutory requirements. Documentary evidence, witness declarations, and any prior communications that reflect the settlor’s wishes can be persuasive to the court. When tax or creditor implications are relevant, courts may also examine financial records, valuations, and professional opinions to understand the potential effects of the modification. Solid, well-organized evidence that clearly explains why the change is necessary and how it preserves the settlor’s objectives increases the likelihood of favorable consideration by the court.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced through court proceedings when there is evidence of incapacity, misconduct, conflict of interest, or failure to perform fiduciary duties. Petitioning the court for removal allows a judge to evaluate the trustee’s actions and, if appropriate, appoint a successor. Courts weigh the need to protect beneficiaries and preserve trust assets against the importance of continuity in administration, and petitions must present clear reasons for removal supported by documentation. In less contentious situations, beneficiaries and trustees can agree on a successor and present a stipulated modification for court approval. This collaborative approach can be faster and less disruptive than contested removal proceedings. Regardless of the route, careful documentation and adherence to procedural notice requirements help ensure that any change to trustee status is legally effective and enforceable.
Beneficiaries and other interested parties are typically served with notice of the petition in accordance with California probate rules. Notices must include details of the relief sought and information about the right to object. Proof of service is filed with the court to demonstrate compliance. Proper service ensures that all parties have an opportunity to participate in or contest the proceedings, which protects the integrity of the court’s decision and reduces the risk of procedural appeals. When beneficiaries are hard to locate or unknown, the court may allow alternative service methods or additional steps to provide notice. Counsel can help identify interested parties, prepare and serve notices, and address requirements for publication or substituted service where permitted. Meeting notice obligations from the outset minimizes procedural challenges and supports a smoother resolution.
Modifying a trust can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change, the value of assets, and the specific tax rules that apply. For example, changes affecting generation-skipping transfer tax planning or retirement plan beneficiary designations may trigger different tax treatment. Creditors’ rights also can be implicated if the modification affects distributions or asset ownership. It is important to evaluate tax implications and creditor considerations as part of the decision to modify a trust. Coordinating with tax and financial advisors ensures that the proposed modification accomplishes the intended estate planning objectives without creating unintended liabilities. When possible, structuring the modification to minimize tax exposure and preserve creditor protections enhances the long-term effectiveness of the estate plan and reduces the risk of adverse financial consequences for beneficiaries.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the matter may proceed as a contested petition where the court evaluates evidence and legal arguments from both sides. Objections can be based on claims that the modification contradicts the settlor’s intent, harms beneficiary interests, or lacks proper legal basis. Courts review the trust document, supporting declarations, and relevant statutes to decide whether to permit the requested change. Objecting beneficiaries have opportunities to present opposing evidence and arguments in court. Settlement efforts such as mediation can often resolve objections by finding compromise solutions that preserve core interests and avoid protracted litigation. Even in contested cases, exploring negotiated resolutions can reduce costs and emotional strain. When settlement is not possible, careful litigation strategy and thorough evidence presentation are essential to achieving a favorable court decision.
Yes, trusts can often be modified after the settlor’s death through court petitions when circumstances justify a change, such as correcting mistakes, addressing ambiguities, or adapting to unforeseen circumstances. California law provides mechanisms for post-death modification where the court finds the change is necessary to effectuate the settlor’s probable intent or to adjust for events that make the original terms impracticable. The petition process requires notice to beneficiaries and a clear factual record supporting the requested modification. Post-death modifications require careful attention to related estate planning documents, tax consequences, and potential creditor issues. Because the settlor cannot directly amend the trust, the court closely scrutinizes evidence of intent and the reasons for change. Presenting clear, well-documented grounds increases the likelihood the court will approve modifications that align with the settlor’s wishes.
Begin by gathering all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, wills, beneficiary designations, account statements, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Prepare a timeline of events and a list of interested parties who must receive notice. Identifying potential objections early helps shape strategy and determine whether a petition, stipulated modification, or informal amendment is most appropriate. This preparation streamlines the filing process and reduces the risk of delays. Consider consulting legal counsel to evaluate legal grounds and procedural requirements, and to coordinate with tax or financial advisors as needed. Counsel helps draft precise pleadings, prepare supporting declarations, and manage service and court deadlines. Early legal guidance increases the chance of a clear, efficient resolution that protects beneficiaries and clarifies administration for trustees.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas