If you are a California resident considering changes to a trust, a trust modification petition can provide a formal path to adjust terms while protecting the interests of beneficiaries. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Van Nuys and throughout Los Angeles County evaluate whether a petition to modify a trust is the right approach. This process can address changes caused by shifting family circumstances, tax law updates, or errors in the original trust documents. Understanding the legal standards, required notices, and court procedures is essential to a successful outcome and to minimizing disputes among interested parties.
Trust modification petitions are often used when the parties need a judicial order to correct mistakes, clarify ambiguous terms, or adapt a trust to current laws and circumstances. In Van Nuys and across California, courts will consider petitions where modification is fair, equitable, and consistent with the settlor’s intent. Your situation may involve contested issues or cooperative agreement among beneficiaries; both paths require careful preparation of evidence, clear legal arguments, and timely filings. Our office assists clients in preparing petitions, serving notices, and representing their interests in hearings to achieve durable and lawful trust modifications.
A properly pursued trust modification petition can prevent future disputes, correct drafting mistakes, and preserve the settlor’s original intent under changed circumstances. In many situations, informal changes are insufficient or legally ineffective, and a court-supervised modification creates a clear, enforceable record. Benefits include resolving ambiguities, ensuring distributions align with current family needs, and addressing tax or asset protection concerns. For trustees and beneficiaries alike, a petition can provide certainty and avoid prolonged litigation down the road. Taking action now with professional legal guidance reduces the risk of contested proceedings and helps secure a predictable outcome for all parties involved.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Van Nuys, San Jose, and throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust-related matters. Our firm brings decades of practical experience guiding clients through trust petitions, probate alternatives, and related proceedings. We emphasize clear communication, careful document review, and tailored strategies that reflect each family’s priorities. From initial assessment through court filings and hearings, we handle complex factual and legal issues while aiming to limit conflict and expense. Clients rely on our steady counsel when they need thoughtful solutions for trust modifications and estate plan updates.
A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes to an existing trust where private agreement or amendment procedures are insufficient. Under California law, courts may authorize modifications for reasons such as correcting mistakes, addressing changed circumstances, or clarifying ambiguous provisions. The process usually requires notice to interested parties, supporting evidence such as declarations or documents, and legal arguments demonstrating that the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s intent or equitable under the circumstances. Preparing a clear petition and responding to potential objections is essential to preserving family relationships and avoiding unintended consequences.
Not all modifications require court involvement; sometimes a trustee and beneficiaries can agree to an amendment under provisions of the trust document. However, when an agreement cannot be reached, the settlor is unavailable, or the modification sought affects rights of third parties, a court petition may be necessary. Petition proceedings often involve careful factual development, including affidavits, trust history, and evidence of changed circumstances such as property transfers, births, deaths, or tax law shifts. Legal counsel helps determine the most appropriate path and assembles the documentation needed to present a persuasive petition to the court.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court to change the terms of an existing trust. Common reasons for filing include correcting drafting errors, adapting trust provisions to new legal requirements, or resolving contradictions that cannot be settled by informal amendments. Courts evaluate petitions on whether the change reflects the settlor’s intent or is otherwise equitable. Petition outcomes create an authoritative, enforceable change to the trust document, which is beneficial for trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties who rely on clear trust instructions for asset management and distribution.
A successful petition typically includes a detailed declaration explaining the requested change, supporting documentary evidence, proper service to interested parties, and legal arguments based on California trust law. Courts also consider whether notice was adequate and whether any parties object. Preparatory work involves reviewing the trust instrument, identifying affected assets, and assessing potential objections from beneficiaries or creditors. Meticulous drafting, timely filings, and transparent communication with all parties increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling and reduce the chance of protracted litigation.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the petition process and communicate effectively with counsel. This glossary covers the roles of settlors, trustees, and beneficiaries, definitions of petitions and amendments, and related concepts like pour-over wills and certification of trust. Knowing these terms clarifies the legal options available and the typical steps required for court review. A well-informed client can better evaluate the merits of a petition, the likely hurdles, and the documentation needed to support requested changes to a trust.
A settlor, sometimes called a grantor or trustor, is the person who creates and funds a trust. The settlor’s original intent guides how courts interpret trust provisions during modification proceedings. When the settlor is alive, changes may be accomplished through amendments specified in the trust; when the settlor is unavailable or deceased, courts look to the trust document, extrinsic evidence, and surrounding circumstances to determine intent. Understanding the settlor’s objectives and the reasons for the proposed modification is central to crafting a persuasive petition that aligns with the trust’s foundational purpose.
A trustee manages trust assets and acts according to the trust terms and California fiduciary law. Trustees must act in beneficiaries’ best interests, follow distribution instructions, and keep accurate records. When a trustee seeks a modification or faces a petition from others, the trustee’s actions and documentation—such as accountings and communications—become critical evidence. Trustees considering changes should document the reasons, consider beneficiary positions, and consult counsel to ensure any proposed modification complies with the trust’s terms and state law while minimizing disputes.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to benefits under a trust. They have the right to receive notice of petitions affecting the trust, to object to proposed changes, and to seek court review if they believe a modification is improper. Courts balance beneficiary rights against the settlor’s intent and equitable considerations. Beneficiaries who communicate concerns early or engage in negotiation with other parties can sometimes reach a settlement that avoids contested litigation, preserving estate assets and family relationships while achieving a workable resolution.
A trust amendment is often a private document executed while the settlor is alive and competent, changing specified provisions within the trust. A petition to modify is a court proceeding used when informal amendment is not possible or when a judicial determination is needed to resolve ambiguity, remedy mistakes, or address changed circumstances. The petition route creates a public, enforceable order and typically involves notice, hearings, and potential objections. Selecting the correct mechanism depends on the trust language, the settlor’s status, and the nature of the proposed change.
When considering changes to a trust, there are several pathways: a settlor-led amendment, a beneficiary agreement where permitted, or a court petition. Amendments are simple when the settlor is available and the trust allows it. Beneficiary agreements may work if all interested parties consent and the trust permits such action. A petition becomes necessary when there is disagreement, uncertainty about the settlor’s intent, or legal obstacles that prevent other methods. Evaluating these options requires a careful review of the trust document, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the legal standards that govern modification in California.
If the settlor is alive and retains capacity, executing an amendment according to the trust’s amendment clause is often the simplest route. This avoids court involvement and preserves privacy. Typical scenarios include updating trustees, changing distribution timing, or adding beneficiaries. Proper execution and recordkeeping are important to prevent future disputes. Even with a straightforward amendment, consulting counsel ensures the change does not unintentionally affect other trust provisions or tax consequences. Clear documentation reduces the likelihood that beneficiaries will later challenge the amendment’s validity.
Some trusts contain clauses allowing beneficiaries to consent to modifications without court approval. When all affected parties agree, this path can save time and legal expense. However, unanimous consent is not always achievable, and certain changes may still require court oversight to protect creditor rights or third-party interests. Even where agreement is possible, formalizing the agreement with proper documentation and legal review helps ensure the modification is enforceable and minimizes future disputes among family members or other interested parties.
When trust language is ambiguous or parties disagree about intent, a court petition provides an authoritative resolution. Complex disputes involving multiple beneficiaries, competing claims, or questions about the settlor’s intent benefit from a formal legal process that evaluates evidence and issues a binding order. The petition route helps ensure that modifications are legally sound and reduces the chance of ongoing litigation. Properly preparing a petition involves gathering declarations, documentary evidence, and persuasive legal analysis tailored to the trust’s facts and the applicable California statutes.
If changes to a trust could affect creditor rights or third-party interests, court involvement often becomes necessary to ensure due process and legal protection for all parties. Courts examine whether the proposed modification harms creditors or violates statutory requirements. Petitions allow the court to balance competing claims and issue orders that protect legitimate interests while allowing appropriate modifications. This process can prevent future challenges, provide clarity for trustees, and preserve the trust estate for intended beneficiaries.
A court-approved modification provides legal certainty and an enforceable record that clarifies trustee duties and beneficiary expectations. When a trusted process yields a formal court order, trustees can act confidently and distributions proceed without the cloud of unresolved disputes. This approach is particularly beneficial where ambiguity, competing claims, or legal changes could otherwise lead to costly litigation. A formal modification also helps preserve family relationships by resolving contentious issues in a structured setting rather than through prolonged private conflict.
In addition to legal clarity, court involvement can address unforeseen consequences of private changes, such as tax implications or impacts on public benefits. An order from the court can resolve disputes over asset allocation, trustee replacement, or interpretation of trust terms. By creating a definitive ruling, parties reduce the likelihood of future challenges and provide trustees with a clear roadmap for administration. Achieving finality through the courts often leads to more predictable outcomes and conserves estate resources over the long term.
Court-ordered modifications carry the weight of judicial authority and are generally more resistant to later challenges than informal arrangements. The finality of a court ruling helps protect trustees who act in accordance with the order and gives beneficiaries assurance that the modification will be recognized by third parties, including financial institutions. This enforceability reduces uncertainty and supports efficient trust administration, avoiding repeated disputes that can erode estate value and family stability.
A formal petition compels parties to consider tax consequences, creditor claims, and unintended distribution issues that might be overlooked in informal changes. The court process encourages disclosure, documentation, and careful legal analysis, which together reduce the chance of adverse outcomes later. By addressing these matters within the petition, trustees and beneficiaries can implement changes that accomplish their goals without compromising other legal protections or financial plans, leading to a more durable and well-reasoned estate plan.
When preparing a petition, gather clear, contemporaneous documentation that explains why the modification is necessary. This can include correspondence, financial statements, medical records, or other evidence showing changed circumstances or drafting errors. Detailed records help the court understand the context and the settlor’s intent, and reduce the likelihood of objections based on missing information. Organizing documents early in the process also streamlines disclosures to beneficiaries and expedites resolution, making the petition more persuasive and easier to navigate.
Before filing a petition, evaluate the long-term implications of the proposed modification, including tax impacts, effects on public benefits for certain beneficiaries, and potential challenges from creditors. Careful analysis helps prevent unintended outcomes that could undermine the estate plan’s goals. Discussing alternatives, such as limited amendments or beneficiary agreements, is part of making an informed decision. Thoughtful planning and legal review can shape a petition that addresses immediate needs while preserving stability for the trust’s administration over time.
Families seek trust modifications for many reasons, including correcting a drafting mistake, updating provisions after a birth or death, addressing changes in asset ownership, or responding to tax law developments. When private amendment is unavailable or beneficiaries disagree, a petition provides a formal avenue to align the trust with current realities. The court evaluates whether the modification supports the settlor’s intent and protects interested parties. Engaging counsel early helps clarify whether a petition is the best approach and prepares the strongest possible case for the requested change.
Other circumstances prompting petitions include resolving conflicts about trustee authority, clarifying distribution schedules, or converting trust terms to meet new financial and family needs. Petition filings are also used when discoverable errors threaten to frustrate the trust’s purpose or when external obligations, such as creditor claims, require judicial oversight. A petition can create an enforceable solution that prevents incremental disputes and provides trustees with legal direction to administer the trust in line with the court’s ruling and the settlor’s presumed intentions.
Typical circumstances include ambiguous trust provisions, errors in beneficiary identification, unexpected tax liabilities, changes in family composition, and disputes over trustee powers. In such cases, parties may be unable to reach agreement without court intervention. Petitions help resolve these matters by allowing the court to interpret the trust, correct errors, or authorize changes that reflect current conditions. Preparing a petition requires evidence of the trust’s history and the reasons for modification, along with careful legal argument tailored to California trust law.
Ambiguities or internal conflicts within a trust can stall administration and cause disputes among beneficiaries. When language is unclear, trustees may be uncertain about distribution authority or priorities. A petition asks the court to construe the document, interpret the settlor’s intent, and issue an order that resolves the ambiguity. This judicial interpretation helps trustees act with confidence and prevents inconsistent actions that could expose them to liability. Seeking a court decision can be the most reliable way to restore clarity and momentum to trust administration.
Life events such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or financial upheaval can render trust provisions outdated or inappropriate. When these changes affect distributions or the roles of beneficiaries and trustees, a modification may be necessary to reflect the current family situation. A court petition allows parties to present evidence of changed circumstances and request adjustments that align the trust with present-day needs. This process helps ensure that the trust continues to serve its intended purpose as family dynamics evolve over time.
Drafting errors, omissions, or administrative mistakes in the trust document or related records can cause significant confusion about asset ownership and distribution. Petitions are often used to correct such errors, whether clerical or substantive, by providing the court with evidence of the mistake and the intended terms. Correcting these problems through a judicial proceeding produces a clear, enforceable resolution and reduces the risk of competing claims that could deplete the estate or delay distributions to beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation and guidance to individuals and families in Van Nuys seeking trust modifications or related trust administration advice. We handle the full petition process, from initial assessment and document collection through filing, notice, and representation at hearings. Our approach focuses on protecting your interests, preserving estate value, and seeking resolutions that minimize conflict and expense. Whether you are a trustee facing difficult choices or a beneficiary concerned about your rights, we offer attentive service and practical solutions tailored to local courts and procedures.
Choosing legal representation for a trust modification petition is an important decision that affects estate administration and family relationships. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings focused experience in estate planning matters, helping clients navigate California court processes and legal requirements. We provide thorough case preparation, clear communication about options and likely outcomes, and practical guidance to reduce conflict and delays. Our goal is to create a durable solution that respects the settlor’s intent and protects the interests of trustees and beneficiaries throughout the modification process.
Our team assists with drafting petitions, identifying and organizing supporting evidence, ensuring proper notice to interested parties, and advocating in court hearings. We strive to anticipate potential objections and address them proactively, which often streamlines proceedings and protects estate assets from unnecessary litigation costs. By focusing on practical solutions, we aim to reach outcomes that are legally sound and administratively workable for trustees who must carry out the court’s order after the petition is resolved.
We represent clients throughout Los Angeles County and maintain familiarity with local rules and judicial expectations that affect petition strategy. Whether the matter calls for negotiation to reach a consensual resolution or for firm advocacy in contested hearings, our approach is grounded in clear legal analysis, professional conduct, and attention to each client’s priorities. If you are dealing with a trust matter in Van Nuys, we can provide the guidance and representation necessary to pursue an effective modification.
Our process begins with a careful intake to understand the trust’s background, the facts leading to the requested modification, and the goals of the parties involved. We review the trust document, collect relevant records, and identify interested parties who must receive notice. After developing the factual and legal basis for the petition, we prepare filings and supporting declarations, coordinate service, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed and provide practical advice to reduce conflict and streamline the court proceeding toward a lasting resolution.
The first step involves a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and the events prompting the requested change. We identify assets affected by the modification, determine who must be notified, and gather evidence such as correspondence, appraisals, medical records, or transaction histories. This factual groundwork supports declarations and legal arguments in the petition. Thorough preparation at this stage often determines whether the petition will resolve quickly or encounter objections that require further litigation or settlement discussions.
Careful document review identifies potential ambiguities, errors, or provisions that limit amendment options. We analyze how the trust provisions interact with California law and evaluate alternative approaches, such as beneficiary agreements or private amendments if available. This analysis helps define the strongest legal theory for a petition and identifies evidence needed to support it. Clear legal reasoning and organized documentation are essential to persuading the court that the proposed modification furthers the trust’s purpose and is appropriate under the circumstances.
Once the scope of affected parties is clear, we prepare accurate notices and serve them according to legal requirements. Proper notice procedures ensure that beneficiaries and other interested parties have an opportunity to respond and that the court has assurance of procedural fairness. Addressing notice issues early prevents procedural defects that could delay the petition or require refiling. Transparency with interested parties can also encourage negotiations that narrow disputes and reduce the need for contested hearings.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires clear statements of facts, concise legal arguments, and well-organized supporting exhibits. We prepare declarations from relevant witnesses, attach documentary evidence, and craft legal memoranda tailored to the trust’s facts and applicable law. Filing with the appropriate court and ensuring that filings comply with local rules is critical to avoid delays. After filing, the court sets a schedule for responses and hearings, and parties can negotiate settlements or prepare for contested proceedings if objections arise.
Declarations provide the narrative and evidentiary backbone of a petition. We work with witnesses to produce clear, factual declarations that explain the reasons for the requested modification, and we attach exhibits such as trust pages, account statements, or correspondence. Well-organized exhibits and credible declarations make it easier for judges to understand the context and justification for the change. Attention to detail in this step often reduces the scope of disagreement and increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling without prolonged hearings.
After filing the petition, we ensure proper service on all interested parties and monitor responses. The court sets a hearing date, and parties may file oppositions or request settlement talks. We prepare briefs and oral argument to address likely objections and clarify legal issues for the judge. Effective scheduling and preparedness for the hearing reduce surprises and allow for efficient presentation of the case, whether the matter resolves by stipulation or proceeds to contested hearing.
Following the hearing, the court may issue an order granting the modification, denying relief, or issuing a limited remedy. When the court approves a modification, it typically issues a written order that becomes part of the trust record. Trustees must then implement the changes in administration, update beneficiary records, and take any steps directed by the court. If the petition is denied, parties may consider alternatives such as negotiated settlement or further legal action. We assist clients through post-order implementation and any necessary follow-up.
Once a modification is approved, trustees should update trust records, financial accounts, and beneficiary designations as directed. Clear implementation prevents confusion and ensures compliance with the court’s order. We help prepare the necessary documentation to reflect changes in asset ownership or distribution instructions and advise trustees on recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Proper follow-through reduces the risk of future disputes and helps beneficiaries receive distributions in accordance with the updated trust terms.
If objections persist after a ruling, parties may seek further relief through motions or appeals where appropriate. We evaluate post-order options and timelines under California law and advise on the most efficient path forward, whether that involves settlement discussions, limited motions for clarification, or appellate review. Our focus is on resolving outstanding issues while preserving estate value and minimizing delay, always communicating realistic expectations about possible outcomes and next steps for clients affected by the court’s decision.
A trust amendment is generally a private change made by the settlor while alive and capable, following the procedures set forth in the trust instrument. Amendments are recorded in internal trust records and do not require court approval when executed properly. A court modification, by contrast, is requested when private amendment is not possible or when the change affects third-party rights or involves ambiguous terms. A petition to the probate court seeks a judicial order that formally alters the trust and resolves competing claims or uncertainties. Filing a petition creates a public record and usually requires notice to interested parties, which can invite objections and lead to hearings. Courts evaluate petitions based on evidence and legal standards designed to honor the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries. While a court modification may involve more time and expense than a private amendment, it provides an enforceable, authoritative resolution that reduces the likelihood of later disputes over the same issues.
A petition to modify a trust may be required when the settlor cannot directly amend the trust, when beneficiaries disagree, or when the requested change could affect creditor or third-party rights. Situations that often prompt petitions include ambiguous language that prevents a trustee from acting, errors in drafting that undermine the trust’s purpose, or significant changes in circumstances such as asset transfers or family events. The court’s involvement ensures proper notice and an impartial determination when private resolution is not feasible. Before filing, it is advisable to evaluate whether the trust document allows beneficiary agreements or other non-court remedies. If those options are not available or are impractical, a petition becomes the primary way to obtain a binding modification. Preparing a thorough factual record and providing clear legal arguments increase the likelihood of an efficient court process and a reliable outcome for all parties involved.
Notice requirements vary by situation, but typically trustees must provide notice to all beneficiaries, the settlor if alive, any successor trustees, and parties with potential creditor claims or other legal interests. California law prescribes procedures for service and timelines to ensure that interested parties have an opportunity to object or participate in the proceedings. Proper and timely notice is essential to avoid procedural defects that could delay the petition or require additional filings. Accurate identification of interested parties is part of the initial case preparation. Parties who might be affected by the modification must be given the chance to respond, and their objections are addressed by the court during the hearing process. Working through the notice process carefully reduces surprises and supports a fair adjudication of the petition.
Yes, beneficiaries have the right to object to a proposed trust modification and to present evidence opposing the petition. The court considers objections and evaluates competing claims in light of the trust document and the settlor’s intent. Objections can raise factual issues, such as disputes about document authenticity or the accuracy of declarations, and legal issues about the propriety of the requested change. A contested petition may require hearings or additional discovery to resolve disputed points. Engaging affected beneficiaries early and attempting to negotiate can sometimes narrow contested issues or produce a settlement that the court will adopt. If objections proceed to hearing, thorough preparation and clear presentation of evidence are important to persuade the court. The goal in any contested matter is to reach a resolution that adheres to legal standards and minimizes disruption to trust administration.
The timeline for resolving a trust modification petition varies widely depending on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple, uncontested matters can move through the filing, notice, and hearing process in a matter of months, while contested petitions involving extensive evidence or multiple parties can take significantly longer. Local court calendars and procedural steps also affect timing, so realistic expectations should reflect those variables. Preparation at the outset—gathering documents, identifying parties, and addressing potential objections—can shorten the process. Early communication among parties may lead to a quicker consented resolution. When disputes persist, the court will schedule hearings that comply with procedural timelines, and post-hearing orders or appeals can extend the overall timeline further.
Helpful evidence for a trust modification petition often includes the trust document itself, related estate planning documents, correspondence showing intent or consent, financial records, and any records demonstrating changed circumstances such as medical or employment information. Declarations from the settlor, trustees, or beneficiaries that explain the reason for the proposed change are commonly used to present a coherent factual narrative to the court. Documentary evidence helps corroborate oral statements and clarifies the historical context. Organizing evidence into clear exhibits and supporting declarations strengthens a petition’s credibility. Courts rely on documented facts to determine whether a modification is appropriate. When documentary evidence is limited, credible sworn testimony and corroborating materials become even more important to establish the circumstances warranting judicial modification.
Courts do not automatically grant trust modification requests; they evaluate petitions based on the trust instrument, statutory law, and the evidence presented. A successful petition demonstrates that the proposed change is consistent with the settlor’s intent, corrects an error, or addresses changed circumstances in a way that is fair to interested parties. Courts weigh objections, creditor interests, and applicable legal standards before issuing an order. Each case is judged on its own merits rather than a presumption in favor of modification. Preparing a compelling factual record and clear legal argument increases the likelihood of a favorable decision. If a petition lacks sufficient evidence or raises unresolved legal issues, the court may deny or limit relief. Where appropriate, courts may also craft tailored remedies that balance competing interests while addressing the problem identified in the petition.
A court-approved modification becomes part of the trust’s governing record and defines how trustees should administer trust assets going forward. Trustees must follow the court order and update trust accounts, distribution instructions, and records accordingly. Following an order reduces trustee exposure to claims by beneficiaries who might otherwise dispute actions taken under an unmodified document. Trustees should document implementation steps and retain records reflecting compliance with the court’s directives. If the court’s order changes trustee powers or duties, trustees need to understand the practical implications for asset management, reporting, and communications with beneficiaries. Proper implementation preserves estate resources and enables trustees to perform their administrative responsibilities with the legal protection provided by the court’s ruling.
Alternatives to filing a petition include private amendments by the settlor, beneficiary agreements when permitted by the trust, or mediation to reach a consensual resolution. These paths can be faster and more private than court proceedings and may preserve family relationships by avoiding adversarial hearings. However, they require the cooperation of interested parties and must be carefully documented to ensure enforceability and prevent later disputes. Not all trusts or situations permit these alternatives, especially when third-party rights are implicated. Mediation or negotiation can narrow contested issues and sometimes produce agreements that the court will later approve. When alternatives are feasible, they often save time and expense. When they are not, a petition provides a formal mechanism for obtaining a binding resolution under California law.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition vary depending on complexity, the need for evidentiary development, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses can include attorney fees for document review and drafting, court filing fees, costs for serving notices, and potential fees for expert witnesses or appraisals if required. Uncontested petitions typically incur lower costs, while contested matters with multiple hearings and discovery will be more expensive. Budgeting for both expected and potential additional costs helps clients make informed decisions. Exploring alternatives such as beneficiary agreements or negotiated settlements can reduce expense. During the initial consultation, we outline likely costs and develop a strategy designed to achieve objectives efficiently. Transparent discussion about anticipated fees and procedural steps helps clients weigh options and choose the approach that best balances cost and desired outcomes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas