If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Vermont Square, a trust modification petition can provide a formal path to updating trust terms to reflect current circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with petition preparation, strategy, and filing, whether adjustments are needed for family changes, tax planning, or to clarify ambiguous provisions. We can review your Revocable Living Trust, Pour-Over Will, or other related documents to determine the proper petition approach and support you through the court procedures and required notices. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss how a petition may help you move forward.
Trust modification petitions are often used when unforeseen events or changes in the law make existing trust terms unworkable or unfair. Common reasons include the need to update distributions, correct drafting errors, add or remove trustees, or address changed beneficiary circumstances. The petition process typically involves preparing legal paperwork, notifying interested parties, presenting grounds for modification, and seeking court approval. In many matters, a carefully drafted petition and clear supporting facts can help avoid protracted disputes and protect family assets for their intended beneficiaries while maintaining fidelity to the settlor’s general intent.
A properly drafted trust modification petition preserves the settlor’s intent while addressing realities that have changed since the trust was created. Pursuing a petition can prevent confusion among beneficiaries, reduce the risk of future litigation, and realign trust administration with current family or financial needs. When handled with careful legal and factual support, a petition can update beneficiary designations, clarify trustee powers, or correct procedural defects without undoing the essential purpose of the trust. For clients in Vermont Square and throughout Los Angeles County, the petition route often provides a controlled, court-supervised solution that reduces long-term uncertainty for heirs and fiduciaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients in probate and trust matters, offering practical legal guidance for estate planning, trust administration, and litigation when necessary. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document review, and strategic filing of petitions or other court documents tailored to the client’s goals. We handle matters involving Revocable Living Trusts, Pour-Over Wills, Heggstad Petitions, and trust modifications, always focused on protecting assets and preserving family relationships where possible. Clients receive straightforward advice about procedural timelines, notice requirements, and potential outcomes so they can make informed decisions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court asking for changes to an existing trust. The petition must identify the trust, explain why modification is necessary, and state the proposed changes. Courts will consider whether the requested modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether the change serves the trust’s overall purpose. Grounds for modification might include changed circumstances, mistakes in the original drafting, or the settlor’s changed intent that was not reflected in the trust document. Properly preparing a petition requires attention to both legal standards and factual detail to persuade the court to approve the requested change.
In many cases, interested parties must be given notice of the petition and an opportunity to respond. The court may schedule a hearing and consider evidence or briefing before ruling. The process also requires careful review of related documents like a Revocable Living Trust, Certification of Trust, Pour-Over Will, and any powers of attorney or health care directives that touch on the settlor’s intent. When beneficiaries or trustees disagree, mediation or settlement efforts can sometimes resolve disputes without a contested hearing, but the court’s oversight provides a definitive resolution when needed to effect the requested modification.
A trust modification petition asks the court to change specific terms of a trust or approve actions that deviate from the original trust language. Petition grounds include clerical errors, ambiguous terms, changes in circumstances for beneficiaries, or provisions that are impossible to implement. The petition explains both the legal basis and the factual reasons for the requested alteration. For trust amendments that cannot be accomplished under the trust’s amendment clause or without all parties’ consent, a petition provides a judicial avenue to achieve equitable adjustments while preserving the trust’s overall purpose and protecting the interests of beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Preparing a petition for trust modification typically involves identifying the trust instrument, describing the proposed changes precisely, gathering supporting declarations or evidence, and determining the appropriate parties to serve with notice. Counsel must assess whether the trust contains an amendment clause, whether the settlor is capable of consenting, and whether any statutory requirements apply. After filing, the court process may include service, responses from interested parties, possible discovery, and a hearing. Carefully documenting the reasons for modification and attempting resolution with beneficiaries can reduce conflict and help the court reach a fair, reasoned outcome.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the petition process and communicates clearly with counsel and the court. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, and certification of trust frequently arise during petitions. Knowing what a Heggstad Petition or a general assignment of assets to trust means can clarify whether court action is needed. This glossary offers concise definitions to demystify legal phrases and ensure informed decision-making while navigating trust modifications, notices, and hearings in Los Angeles County courts.
The settlor is the person who originally established the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intent is central to any petition to modify the trust, and courts generally seek to preserve that original intent unless there is a compelling legal reason to change the terms. When the settlor is alive and capable, their consent can simplify modifications; if the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, petitions must be supported by evidence that the requested changes align with the settlor’s objectives or address unforeseen issues that impede administration.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing used to transfer assets that were intended to be in a trust but were left in the settlor’s name at death. It seeks judicial recognition that those assets belong to the trust despite not having been formally retitled. This remedy can simplify administration and help distributions proceed according to the trust’s terms. The petition requires presenting evidence of the settlor’s intent, the nature of the asset transfer, and why the court should treat the asset as trust property for probate and distribution purposes.
A Certification of Trust is a short document that summarizes essential terms of a trust without disclosing the full trust instrument. It typically verifies the trustee’s authority to act and is used to facilitate transactions with banks, brokers, or other third parties. In the context of a petition, the certification may be used to demonstrate the trust’s existence and the trustee’s power to request court relief. It helps protect the settlor’s privacy while allowing necessary verification of trust terms for legal and administrative purposes.
A Pour-Over Will is a testamentary document that directs any assets not already included in the trust at the settlor’s death to be transferred into the trust for distribution according to its terms. It acts as a safety net ensuring that unforeseen or overlooked property becomes part of the trust estate. When issues arise concerning assets that should have poured into the trust, a petition or related court filing may be used to confirm the trust’s claim and allow the trustee to administer those assets in alignment with the settlor’s trust plan.
When trust issues arise, there are several routes to consider: informal agreement among interested parties, filing a petition for modification, or pursuing contested litigation to resolve disputes. Informal resolution can be faster and less costly when beneficiaries and trustees are aligned, but it requires consensus and proper documentation. Petitions to the court create a formal record and provide a binding outcome when parties disagree or when statutory requirements prevent informal changes. Each option carries trade-offs in time, cost, privacy, and finality, so choosing the right path requires thoughtful evaluation of the facts and likely responses from interested parties.
Minor drafting ambiguities, clerical errors, or circumstances where all beneficiaries and trustees agree can often be resolved through a limited approach without full-scale litigation. A written amendment signed by the settlor, if possible, or consent forms from all interested parties can accomplish modest changes while preserving relationships. Documentation that clearly states the parties’ agreement and records the intent behind the change is essential to prevent future disputes. When all parties cooperate, a streamlined process can be both efficient and cost-effective, avoiding the need for extended court involvement.
Administrative mistakes, such as misnamed accounts or assets left in the settlor’s individual name, can sometimes be addressed through corrective documents and coordination with financial institutions. Instruments like a general assignment of assets to trust or a Certification of Trust can help move assets into the trust without altering substantive trust terms. Properly documenting these corrections and notifying affected parties reduces the chance of later contention. Working with counsel and financial institutions to ensure accurate records often resolves these issues without the need to petition the court for modification.
Comprehensive changes that affect distributions, alter beneficiary interests, or change trustee powers generally require court involvement because they can materially affect third-party rights. Courts will evaluate whether the proposed modification respects the settlor’s overall intent and whether notice and due process have been provided to interested parties. When significant interests are at stake or beneficiaries object, a petition brings the matter before a judge who can issue a binding order. This formal approach ensures transparency, preserves legal protections for all parties, and provides an enforceable resolution.
If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or if the trust language conflicts with other estate documents such as a Pour-Over Will or health care directives, a petition may be required to resolve competing interpretations. The court examines evidence, including the trust instrument, related documents, and relevant testimony, to determine the appropriate remedy. Resolving such disputes through the judicial process provides a definitive answer that trustees can rely upon when administering the trust and distributing assets according to the court’s judgment.
A comprehensive, court-supported approach to trust modification offers certainty and finality that informal agreements can lack, particularly when parties have conflicting views. Court approval creates a binding order that clarifies legal rights, limits future challenges, and provides a formal record for trustees, financial institutions, and beneficiaries. When a petition is well-supported by documentation and legal reasoning, courts can craft tailored remedies that resolve complex issues in a single proceeding, thereby reducing the likelihood of piecemeal disputes and administrative delays during trust administration.
Additionally, involving the court can help protect vulnerable beneficiaries and ensure that trustees act within their authority under judicial oversight. For families with complicated asset structures, blended relationships, or contested distributions, a definitive court ruling prevents ongoing uncertainty and helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties with confidence. While the process may require more time and preparation than informal solutions, the long-term benefit of clear, enforceable directives for managing and distributing trust assets often outweighs the initial investment.
A court-approved modification provides legal protection by creating an authoritative resolution that trustees can rely on when taking actions on behalf of the trust. This finality reduces the risk that future disputes will reopen settled issues, and it clarifies distribution plans for beneficiaries. Trustees benefit from knowing their decisions are supported by a judicial order, and beneficiaries gain clarity on their entitlements. In complex estates, this stability can prevent drawn-out conflicts and help families move forward with administration and distribution in an orderly manner.
A comprehensive petition can resolve inconsistencies among multiple estate planning instruments, including a Revocable Living Trust, Pour-Over Will, HIPAA Authorization, and powers of attorney. By presenting all relevant documents and evidence to the court, the petition process allows a single ruling that aligns the estate plan and addresses clerical mistakes or conflicting provisions. This holistic resolution streamlines administration and reduces the risk of later litigation by ensuring the court’s decision governs all related assets and directives, rather than leaving issues unresolved across multiple documents.
Begin by assembling the trust instrument, any amendments, the Certification of Trust, Pour-Over Will, powers of attorney, advance health care directive, and any assignments of assets. Full documentation allows the petition to clearly explain the trust’s original terms and the basis for proposed changes. Gather bank statements, account titles, and records showing any assets that should have been transferred to the trust. The more complete and organized the record, the more persuasive the petition and supporting declarations will be when presented to the court.
Supporting declarations, affidavits, and documentary evidence explaining the changed circumstances, drafting errors, or other reasons for modification make a petition more persuasive. Provide factual context for why the requested changes align with the settlor’s intent and why they are necessary for proper administration. Where appropriate, include records of communications, medical evidence for incapacity issues, or financial documentation showing the practical need for modification. Clear, organized evidence helps the court understand the matter and grants relief that reflects the trust’s purpose.
Consider a petition if the trust contains ambiguous language, the settlor is incapacitated and unable to amend the trust, assets intended for the trust were not transferred, or beneficiary circumstances have changed significantly. A petition can also address errors in the original drafting, correct account titling issues, or resolve conflicts between trust provisions and other estate planning documents. When informal solutions are impractical or when legal rights of beneficiaries are affected, a carefully prepared petition brought to court can provide a definitive path forward and reduce future uncertainty for trustees and heirs.
You might also consider a petition when trustees require judicial instruction on how to proceed with administration due to unclear directives, or when a third party disputes the trust’s authority over certain assets. In cases involving blended families, complex assets, or charitable provisions, judicial review can reconcile competing interpretations and deliver a binding order. Early evaluation of the trust, relevant documents like Pension or Retirement Plan Trusts, and potential claims against the trust helps determine whether a petition is the most appropriate remedy versus negotiated amendments or other administrative corrections.
Petitions commonly arise when a trust maker failed to transfer assets into the trust before death, when beneficiaries’ needs change over time, or when administrative errors create uncertainty about who should receive trust assets. Other triggers include ambiguous drafting, trustee disputes over authority, or the discovery of previously unknown creditors or claims. Additionally, changes in family structure, such as marriage, divorce, or the birth of new beneficiaries, often prompt requests for modification to ensure the trust’s distribution plan reflects current intentions and circumstances.
A frequent circumstance is finding assets that were intended to be held in the trust but were never retitled, such as bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or real property left in the settlor’s name. When that happens, the trustee may file a Heggstad Petition or related petition to have the court recognize those assets as trust property for distribution purposes. Proper documentation showing intent to fund the trust and relationships between the settlor and the assets helps the court make a determination that aligns administration with the trust plan.
Shifts in beneficiary needs, such as financial hardship, disability, or changes in living arrangements, can make existing trust terms impractical or unfair. When the trust does not provide adequate flexibility for changing circumstances, a petition can request modifications that better serve beneficiaries while remaining faithful to the settlor’s overall intent. Addressing these changes through the court ensures that decisions are documented and enforceable, and that trustees have clear authority to act in ways that reflect the revised plan.
Ambiguous language or conflicts between the trust and other estate planning documents can lead to disputes among trustees and beneficiaries. Whether the issue involves inconsistent distribution instructions, unclear trustee powers, or conflicts with a Pour-Over Will, a petition asks the court to resolve interpretation issues. The court will examine the documents, the settlor’s intent, and relevant facts to produce an order that clarifies how the trust should be administered and which document controls when inconsistencies arise.
Residents of Vermont Square and nearby neighborhoods can rely on the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for guidance on trust modification petitions and related estate administration matters. We help clients understand their options, collect necessary documents like Revocable Living Trusts and Certifications of Trust, and navigate notice and filing requirements in Los Angeles County courts. Our aim is to secure practical solutions that protect assets and minimize family conflict, while providing clear next steps and an honest assessment of likely outcomes for your situation.
Clients turn to our firm for a combination of personalized attention and practical court experience in trust and probate matters. We prioritize clear communication about procedures, timelines, and potential outcomes, and we tailor petition strategies to the specifics of each client’s trust documents and family dynamics. Our goal is to help clients preserve the settlor’s intent, secure necessary court orders, and protect beneficiaries’ rights while managing costs and reducing unnecessary conflict during trust administration.
From initial document review through petition drafting, service, and court hearings, we provide thorough preparation designed to support favorable resolutions. We work closely with trustees and beneficiaries to collect evidence, prepare declarations, and explain the legal standards the court will apply. By anticipating likely objections and addressing procedural requirements early, we seek to keep matters focused and avoid surprises at hearing, which often leads to more predictable and satisfactory outcomes for all parties involved.
We also assist with related estate planning tasks that commonly arise during petition matters, such as preparing or updating Pour-Over Wills, Certifications of Trust, HIPAA Authorizations, financial powers of attorney, and guardianship nominations. Addressing interrelated documents together helps create a cohesive plan and reduces the chance of future disputes. Our client-centered approach emphasizes practical solutions that protect family relationships while ensuring legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and all related documents to identify the needed changes and the legal basis for a petition. We then prepare the petition and supporting declarations, identify and notify interested parties, and file the matter in the appropriate Los Angeles County court. Throughout the process we advise on potential settlement opportunities and represent clients at hearings if required. Clear communication and careful preparation are central to our approach, which seeks to achieve legally sound and practically workable outcomes.
The first step is collecting and reviewing the trust instrument, amendments, Certification of Trust, Pour-Over Will, and any related powers of attorney or health care directives. We assess whether the petition is the appropriate route by examining the trust’s amendment provisions, the settlor’s capacity, and the interests of beneficiaries. This review identifies potential procedural issues, required notice recipients, and the evidence necessary to support the petition. A clear assessment at this stage sets the foundation for effective petition drafting and strategy.
Gathering complete documentation is essential: trust instruments, bank and brokerage statements, deeds, beneficiary communications, and medical records if incapacity is an issue. Photos of documents, email exchanges, and affidavits from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent or actions may also be useful. Organizing this evidence into a coherent narrative supports the factual assertions in the petition and strengthens the likelihood of a favorable judicial decision. Accuracy and thoroughness in this stage are key to avoiding surprises later in the process.
Identifying all interested parties and determining proper service is a critical procedural consideration. Beneficiaries, alternate beneficiaries, trustees, and other persons with potential claims must often be given notice. We evaluate statutory notice obligations and the court’s local rules to ensure compliance, reducing the risk of procedural challenges. Early and proper notification also creates opportunities for dialogue and potential resolution before a contested hearing, which can save time and resources for everyone involved.
Once the factual and legal basis for modification is established, we draft the petition, including precise proposed modifications, supporting factual declarations, and any required exhibits. The petition outlines the relief requested and the legal grounds the court should apply. After targeted proofreading and client review, the petition is filed with the court and served on interested parties. We prepare to respond to any initial objections and to pursue settlement discussions to resolve matters without a contested hearing when possible.
Supporting declarations explain the facts underpinning the requested changes, such as evidence of the settlor’s intent, documentation of administrative errors, or medical information demonstrating incapacity. Exhibits may include relevant trust provisions, bank records, deeds, and correspondence. Clear, well-organized declarations make it easier for the court to understand the reasons for the petition and the practical effects of the proposed modification. Precision in these materials enhances credibility and provides the court with a reliable factual basis for its ruling.
After filing the petition, we follow the court’s procedures for case management, scheduling, and mandatory disclosures. Proper service on interested parties is confirmed, and the court may set deadlines for responses or discovery. We monitor the case calendar, prepare any necessary preliminary motions, and engage in settlement discussions when appropriate. Keeping the process organized and responsive to court requirements helps move the matter forward efficiently and positions clients for the best possible procedural and substantive outcome.
The final stage may involve negotiation and settlement or a contested hearing where the court hears evidence and issues a ruling. If the court approves the petition, it will enter an order reflecting the modified trust terms or other relief granted. We draft proposed orders, assist with compliance steps, and advise trustees on implementing the court’s directives. If objections remain, we advocate for our client’s position at hearing while presenting evidence that the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose.
Many matters resolve through negotiation or mediation before a hearing, especially when the parties prioritize certainty and cost control. Settlement agreements can be incorporated into court orders to provide enforceable resolutions that preserve relationships and avoid protracted litigation. We facilitate productive discussions, propose reasonable solutions, and draft settlement language that can be presented to the court for approval. This path often achieves practical results while minimizing stress and expense for trustees and beneficiaries.
When hearings are necessary, we present evidence, examine witnesses if required, and advocate for a judicial order that effectuates the requested modification. The court’s decision becomes the authoritative directive for trustees and third parties handling trust assets. After obtaining an order, we assist with implementation tasks such as retitling assets, updating account records, and communicating changes to beneficiaries and financial institutions. Ensuring proper execution of the court’s order helps prevent future disputes and supports orderly administration of the trust.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court asking for changes to an existing trust when amendment under the trust instrument or unanimous consent is not feasible. People consider a petition when there are drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, assets left outside the trust, changed beneficiary circumstances, or conflicting estate documents. The petition explains the proposed change, the factual basis for modification, and why the court should approve the relief sought, with supporting declarations and documentation. Deciding to file depends on the specific facts and the likelihood of reaching agreement among interested parties. If affected beneficiaries and trustees are receptive to a negotiated amendment, that approach may avoid court time and expense. When consensus is absent or legal rights are implicated, the petition route provides a binding judicial resolution. Early assessment of the trust, ancillary documents, and potential parties to serve helps determine whether a petition is the appropriate next step.
The time to resolution varies based on case complexity, the number of interested parties, and court schedules. Simple matters with cooperative parties and clear evidence may resolve in a few months, while contested petitions involving multiple objections, discovery, or hearings can take longer. Local court backlogs and the need for additional filings or continuances also affect the timeline. Preparing strong documentation and seeking early case management can reduce delays and help set realistic expectations for the process. Working proactively to identify and contact interested parties, gather supporting evidence, and attempt informal resolution where appropriate often shortens the overall time frame. If a hearing is necessary, scheduling depends on the court’s calendar and any preliminary matters that must be resolved first. Counsel can advise on likely timelines based on similar matters in Los Angeles County and recommend steps to expedite proceedings when practicable.
Typically, all beneficiaries, trustees, and other persons with a legal interest in the trust must be notified of a petition to modify the trust. Parties who may have notice rights include named beneficiaries, contingent beneficiaries, surviving spouses, and sometimes certain creditors or personal representatives, depending on the nature of the relief sought. Following the court’s rules and statutory notice requirements is important to prevent procedural challenges to the petition. Proper service includes preparing and sending required documents and filing proof of service with the court. In some situations, providing notice by publication or through alternate methods may be necessary when a party cannot be located. Ensuring comprehensive and correct notice at the outset reduces the risk of delays or objections based on improper service.
A trust can sometimes be modified after the settlor’s death or upon the settlor’s incapacity, but the grounds and procedures differ from modifications made while the settlor is capable. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, petitions often rely on evidence that the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s intent or that administrative errors must be corrected to carry out the trust’s purpose. The court carefully examines such requests to ensure they do not improperly alter the settlor’s original objectives. If the settlor is alive and has capacity, direct amendment or execution of an amendment document may be possible without court involvement. When capacity is lacking or the settlor has passed away, bringing a petition allows the court to evaluate the evidence, hear from interested parties, and issue an order that clarifies the trust’s terms and instructs trustees on proper administration despite the settlor’s inability to participate.
A Heggstad Petition requires clear evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust despite the asset remaining in the settlor’s name. Useful evidence includes account statements, beneficiary designations, correspondence with financial institutions indicating the settlor’s plan, drafts or copies of trust funding instructions, and testimony from witnesses who were aware of the settlor’s intentions. Documentation showing the asset was meant to be managed or distributed under the trust bolsters the petition. The court will look for a coherent narrative demonstrating intent and the practical effects of treating the asset as trust property. Where necessary, affidavits from trustees or witnesses, along with supporting records, help establish that the assets should be administered according to the trust rather than through probate. Careful assembly of these materials increases the likelihood the court will recognize the asset as part of the trust.
Court filings generally become part of the public record, which means that the petition and related documents may be accessible through court records. However, it is sometimes possible to limit public disclosure by submitting narrowly tailored pleadings, requesting sealing for particularly sensitive materials, or using summaries or redacted exhibits when allowed by the court. Discussing privacy concerns early in the process helps identify steps to protect confidential information while still providing the court with necessary evidence. Certain financial institutions accept a Certification of Trust instead of the full trust document for routine transactions, which helps preserve privacy in many administrative matters. When court filings are likely to reveal sensitive provisions, counsel can explore limited filing strategies and protective orders, although availability depends on the court’s rules and the specific facts of the case.
Yes, beneficiaries can challenge a proposed modification by filing objections with the court and presenting opposing evidence. Common objections question whether the requested change reflects the settlor’s intent or whether proper notice and procedural steps were followed. The court will consider the objections and weigh the evidence before ruling. When challenges arise, the process may involve discovery, briefing, and a contested hearing where both sides present their positions. Because objections can prolong resolution and increase costs, many parties attempt negotiation or mediation to reach an agreed solution. Settlement can provide certainty and avoid the expense of litigation. When objections are uncontested or are resolved through compromise, the court can approve modifications that reflect the parties’ agreement and the settlor’s intent, streamlining administration thereafter.
Alternatives to a petition include seeking unanimous written consent from all beneficiaries to execute an amendment, using available amendment clauses in the trust if the settlor is able to sign, or resolving disputes through mediation or negotiated settlement. Administrative corrections such as a general assignment of assets to trust or updating account titles may address some issues without court involvement. These alternatives can be quicker and less costly when parties agree and the legal changes required are minor. However, when unanimity is not possible, parties disagree about the settlor’s intent, or formal court authorization is required to change substantive rights, a petition may be the only way to achieve a binding resolution. Evaluating the feasibility and risks of each approach helps determine whether informal solutions or a formal petition best protects the parties’ interests and the trust’s purpose.
Before contacting counsel, gather the trust instrument and any amendments, related estate planning documents such as a Pour-Over Will or Certification of Trust, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence with financial institutions. Collect records that show the intent to fund the trust or evidence of assets that should have been included. Organize photos or copies of documents, and prepare a timeline of key events including dates of execution, amendments, or relevant communications. Also compile information about beneficiaries and trustees, including contact details and known addresses, which will help determine notice requirements. If medical or capacity issues are relevant, collect medical records or statements from treating professionals. Having these materials prepared before the first meeting allows counsel to provide a focused assessment of options and likely next steps.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, the extent of required discovery, and whether the petition is contested. Typical costs include attorney fees for document review, petition drafting, service of process, court filing fees, and potential costs for obtaining medical or other expert declarations or testimony if needed. Uncontested matters are generally less expensive, while disputes that require hearings and extensive litigation will incur higher costs. Many clients benefit from a clear fee estimate early in the process and discussions about cost-saving options such as mediation or targeted litigation to address only the most important issues. Counsel can often propose phased approaches, starting with document review and a case assessment to provide a better cost projection and to identify opportunities for limited, efficient resolution where appropriate.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas