If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Walnut Park, a trust modification petition may be the legal path to update terms, beneficiaries, or administrative provisions. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps clients understand when a petition is appropriate and what the court will consider. We serve individuals and families throughout Los Angeles County and can explain state requirements, likely timelines, and the practical effects of modification on asset management and distribution. This introduction provides a clear starting point so you can decide whether pursuing a formal petition is the right step for your circumstances.
Trust modification petitions can arise from changes in family circumstances, tax law shifts, or mistakes in original drafting that created unintended results. This guide outlines common reasons to seek a modification, the legal standards California courts apply, and what documentation typically supports a petition. It also reviews options other than a court filing, such as decanting or trustee-initiated amendments when available. Our goal is to equip you with the information needed to make a thoughtful choice about pursuing a modification, recognizing that every trust situation is unique and requires careful factual review.
A properly handled trust modification petition can restore the trust creator’s intent, correct drafting mistakes, and respond to changed circumstances like remarriage, divorce, or the birth of new heirs. Seeking a petition may also resolve ambiguities that otherwise produce costly disputes among beneficiaries. When the court approves a change, the revised trust document reflects enforceable terms that guide trustees and protect beneficiaries. Pursuing a petition can provide clarity, reduce future litigation risk, and ensure assets are distributed in accordance with current wishes while maintaining oversight and legal validity under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services from San Jose with client representation throughout California, including Walnut Park and Los Angeles County. The firm assists with a wide range of trust matters such as revocable living trusts, irrevocable trusts, retirement plan trusts, and trust modification petitions. We focus on practical legal solutions that reflect each client’s objectives, offering clear guidance on documentation, court filings, and negotiation with interested parties. Clients receive responsive communication and attention to detail to help move matters forward with diligence and care.
A trust modification petition asks a court to approve changes to an existing trust when the parties cannot implement an amendment outside of court or when legal obstacles prevent a straightforward change. Grounds for a petition include ambiguity in language, changes in circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or the need to correct errors in the original document. The process typically begins with a factual review, preparation of a petition setting forth legal grounds, and notice to interested persons so the court can evaluate objections, evidence, and whether modification serves the trust’s overall intent.
The court will consider the trust’s original terms, the settlor’s intent as reflected in available evidence, and whether the proposed modification advances or restores that intent without unfairly harming beneficiaries. Interested parties have opportunities to respond, and the judge may schedule hearings to resolve factual disputes. The petition process can vary in duration depending on complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether contested issues arise. Proper preparation and clear documentary support are essential for presenting a persuasive case to the court for modification.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate or superior court asking for a change to the terms or operation of a trust. It applies when parties lack authority to amend the trust unilaterally, or when legal or factual obstacles require judicial approval. Modifications can address administrative provisions, beneficiary designations, distribution terms, or trustee powers. The petition must show why modification is appropriate under California statutes and case law, often relying on evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, or changes in circumstances that reveal the settlor’s intent and the necessity for adjustment.
A successful petition is grounded in clear factual statements, competent supporting documents, and legal arguments that demonstrate why the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or is required to correct an error. Typical steps include collecting trust instruments and related documents, preparing the petition and proposed order, serving notice on beneficiaries and interested parties, and attending hearings as needed. The court will review objections, consider depositions or declarations when necessary, and issue an order reflecting the approved modification. Timely, strategic preparation reduces the risk of contested litigation.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate a trust modification petition. Key terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, modification, decanting, reformation, and petition. These concepts describe who controls the trust, who benefits, the types of court actions available, and the legal standards for changing a trust. Familiarity with these terms helps clients follow the litigation or administrative path and communicate effectively with counsel about objectives, risks, and documentation needed to support a requested change in trust provisions under California law.
The settlor is the person who created the trust, established its terms, and transferred assets into it. Understanding the settlor’s expressed or demonstrated intent is central to any modification petition because the court’s goal is frequently to honor that intent. Evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or known circumstances at the time of drafting can help clarify intent. When the settlor is alive, their current wishes may also be relevant, but the legal standards vary based on trust type and applicable statutes that govern amendments or reformation in California.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust to reflect the settlor’s true intent when a mistake in the drafting process created an outcome inconsistent with that intent. A petition for reformation usually requires clear and convincing evidence of the mistake and the intent that should have been reflected. Reformation differs from routine amendment because it corrects a drafting error rather than implementing a new decision by the settlor. Courts will weigh documentation and testimony to determine whether reformation is warranted under California law.
The trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust assets, follow the trust terms, and distribute assets to beneficiaries. Trustee duties include record-keeping, making prudent investment decisions, and acting in beneficiaries’ best interests. When a trustee’s powers are insufficient to accomplish needed changes, a modification petition can ask the court to grant authority or approve specific amendments. The trustee may be a party to the petition, particularly if they seek guidance or court approval for actions that affect the trust’s administration.
Decanting is the process where a trustee transfers assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms, permitted under certain statutes and trust language. It can be an alternative to a court petition when the trustee has authority to reshape distributions or powers. Decanting may address tax planning, beneficiary needs, or administrative clarity without judicial intervention, but it requires careful analysis of trustee powers, timing, and notice requirements. When decanting is not available, a court petition may be the viable route to accomplish desired changes.
When considering changes to a trust, clients commonly weigh options such as informal amendment, trustee-led decanting, or filing a trust modification petition. Informal amendment may suffice when the settlor is alive and retains amendment power, while decanting can be efficient when trustee powers allow it. A petition becomes necessary when formal judicial approval is required to correct mistakes, resolve disputes, or grant authority beyond current trustee powers. Each option carries different procedural requirements, notice duties, and risks, so assessing the trust document and facts is essential to choose the most appropriate path.
If the settlor remains alive and the trust document expressly allows the settlor to amend or revoke the trust, a formal court petition may not be necessary. In those situations, executing a valid amendment or restatement that conforms to the trust’s requirements can achieve the desired result efficiently. This approach avoids court costs and public filings, and it preserves privacy. It is important to confirm that the amendment language is clear, correctly executed, and that any required notices to beneficiaries are provided to prevent future disputes or challenges to the validity of the change.
When the trust instrument grants the trustee explicit authority to decant or to exercise broad discretionary powers, the trustee may be able to implement changes by transferring assets into a new trust with updated terms. Decanting can address administrative problems, beneficiary needs, or tax considerations without involving the court. However, the trustee must ensure actions comply with statutory requirements and fiduciary duties, provide necessary notices, and document the rationale for the change to minimize the risk of future objections by beneficiaries who may view the transfer as altering their interests.
If the trust contains drafting errors, ambiguous language, or omissions that could defeat the settlor’s intended distribution plan, pursuing a court petition may be the most reliable route to secure a binding solution. A comprehensive legal approach includes assembling documentary evidence, preparing persuasive legal arguments, and conducting the necessary notice and hearing procedures. This level of representation helps ensure that the court fully understands the factual background and the specific correction or reformulation needed to align the trust with the settlor’s true objectives for asset management and distribution.
When beneficiaries or co-trustees disagree about a proposed change, a petition provides a formal forum for resolving disputes with judicial authority. Representation that covers investigation, negotiation, and litigation ensures that procedural requirements are met and that your position is presented effectively to the court. Handling contested matters thoroughly reduces the risk of incomplete or reversible actions and can help achieve a durable resolution that protects fiduciary duties and beneficiaries’ rights under California law, while addressing legitimate concerns raised by interested parties.
A comprehensive approach to a trust modification petition can deliver clarity, enforceability, and finality. When a court approves a modification or reformation, the resulting order typically reduces ambiguity and limits future challenges. The process also creates a documented record of the rationale for the change and the legal basis, which trustees and beneficiaries can rely on when administering the trust. For families facing complex asset structures or potential disputes, judicial approval often provides the strongest assurance that the modification will hold over time and under scrutiny.
Another advantage of pursuing a formal petition is the opportunity to involve the court in balancing competing interests and resolving contested issues in a neutral setting. This can be especially important when beneficiaries have conflicting expectations or when proposed changes affect statutory rights. A court order can clarify trustee powers, confirm distributions, and authorize actions that trustees otherwise could not take. Ultimately, the comprehensive route safeguards the integrity of the estate plan and helps ensure that the settlor’s intentions are honored within the framework of California law.
Obtaining court approval for a trust modification creates a binding order that clarifies rights and obligations for trustees and beneficiaries. This binding result reduces the likelihood of future litigation over the same issue and gives administrators a clear directive to follow. In cases involving complex family dynamics or significant assets, a binding order can be essential to prevent subsequent disputes that drain estate resources. The clarity provided by the court’s decision also supports stable trust administration and provides a reliable basis for fiduciary decision-making going forward.
A comprehensive petition process focuses on restoring or preserving the settlor’s intent where possible, ensuring that the trust documents reflect the underlying wishes rather than unintended drafting outcomes. By presenting evidence and legal argument, the petition seeks to align the operative document with the settlor’s purpose while maintaining legal form. This careful approach protects beneficiaries’ expectations and prevents inconsistencies that could arise if changes were made informally without adequate legal process or documentation to support the revised terms.
Before initiating a petition, collect the original trust document, any amendments or restatements, related wills like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, beneficiary designations, and relevant correspondence. Providing a complete documentary record allows the court to assess intent and identify drafting errors. Accurate records of asset ownership, account statements, and prior trustee actions also help clarify administration questions. This preparation reduces delays and strengthens your position by giving the judge and all interested parties a clear factual foundation for any requested modification.
Anticipate the kinds of objections beneficiaries might raise and assemble supporting evidence in advance, such as earlier drafts, emails, or declarations that reflect the settlor’s intent. Consider whether independent valuations, financial records, or medical documentation are needed to explain changed circumstances that justify modification. Preparing witness statements or declarations that address key factual disputes can streamline hearings and reduce surprises. Thorough preparation positions you to address objections effectively and to present a concise, focused case that explains why the court should grant the requested modification.
Families often consider a petition when the trust no longer meets current needs due to life changes such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or moves across state lines. Financial changes like new tax law impacts or the discovery of drafting errors that cause unintended results are also common reasons. A petition can correct errors, clarify ambiguous language, or grant trustees authority needed for proper administration. Where privacy, finality, and enforceability matter, pursuing a court-approved modification helps ensure the trust functions as intended for both present administrators and future beneficiaries.
Other compelling reasons include resolving disputes among beneficiaries, addressing special needs or elder care concerns, and clarifying retirement or life insurance trust terms. A petition can address provisions that hinder asset management or create administrative burdens that were not anticipated. When careful legal analysis shows that a judicial order will better protect the trust’s purposes and the interests of beneficiaries, initiating a petition may be the most prudent course to secure a lasting, legally defensible outcome that supports effective long-term trust administration.
Trust modification petitions commonly arise from situations such as ambiguous beneficiary definitions, changes in family composition, trustee incapacity, or mistakes in trust drafting that yield unintended distributions. In some instances, tax law changes or shifts in asset ownership require adjustments to trust terms to maintain intended tax outcomes. Petitions may also be necessary when a trustee needs court authorization to exercise a power not clearly granted, or when a conflict among beneficiaries must be resolved to permit proper administration of trust assets in accordance with the settlor’s intent.
Ambiguous language or conflicting provisions within a trust can create uncertainty that undermines effective administration and prompts disputes among beneficiaries. When plain reading of the document does not resolve the inconsistency, a petition for reformation or clarification asks the court to interpret or correct the terms. The court will consider extrinsic evidence if necessary to determine the settlor’s intent and issue an order that resolves the ambiguity. Clearing up such language protects beneficiaries and trustees and provides an authoritative directive for future administration.
Major life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or significant changes in wealth can render original trust provisions outdated or impractical. When the settlor is unable to amend the trust directly, or when changes affect third-party rights, a petition may be needed to align the trust with current realities. Courts will examine how any proposed modification supports the settlor’s probable intent and whether it protects the interests of beneficiaries. Addressing these changes through the proper legal channel helps ensure that the trust remains an effective tool for estate planning.
Trustees sometimes face limitations in authority that prevent them from taking needed administrative actions, such as selling property, reallocating assets, or adjusting distribution schedules. When the trust does not provide necessary powers, a petition can request court authorization to permit appropriate management steps. Administrative obstacles may also include outdated provisions that complicate routine actions. Seeking judicial clarification or modification allows trustees to fulfill their fiduciary duties while giving beneficiaries and the court assurance that actions taken are lawful and consistent with the trust’s purposes.
Although the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is based in San Jose, the firm represents clients across California, including Walnut Park and greater Los Angeles County. We provide personalized attention whether matters are handled remotely or require in-person appearances for hearings. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical planning, and careful documentation to support any petition or trust administration task. Contact us by phone or email to discuss your particular situation and determine whether a trust modification petition or another course of action best achieves your objectives.
Clients seek representation that combines attentive client service with a deep understanding of California trust law, thorough preparation, and clear courtroom presentation when required. Our firm focuses on building a complete factual record, presenting persuasive legal arguments, and managing communications with interested parties to reduce conflict and streamline proceedings. We aim to provide service that respects client priorities, preserves privacy where possible, and seeks durable court-authorized resolutions that permit trustees to administer the trust with confidence.
We place emphasis on listening to your goals, identifying documentary support for requested changes, and advising on alternatives such as decanting or negotiated amendments when appropriate. Our representation includes preparing petitions, handling required notices, coordinating with financial and tax advisors as needed, and advocating for reasonable outcomes at hearings. For matters involving complex assets or family dynamics, strategic planning and thorough presentation are essential to achieving effective and lasting results through a petition process.
When seeking a trust modification, clear communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and the court is essential. We assist clients in anticipating objections, documenting intentions, and crafting proposals that are legally sound and practical to implement. Whether the matter is straightforward or contested, our goal is to guide clients through each stage of the process with timely updates, careful preparation, and an emphasis on achieving a resolution that honors the settlor’s intent while protecting stakeholders’ interests.
Our process begins with an initial review of your trust documents and a consultation to identify objectives and constraints. We then assemble supporting materials, evaluate alternatives such as decanting or amendment if applicable, and prepare a petition with proposed orders for court consideration. We handle required notices to beneficiaries, respond to any objections, and represent you at hearings. Throughout, we prioritize clarity in documentation and communication to present a focused case that helps the court reach a decision that aligns with the trust’s purposes.
The first step involves a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and all available evidence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. We assess whether a judicial petition is necessary or whether alternative mechanisms may achieve the same result. This stage includes identifying interested parties, determining notice requirements, and developing a legal strategy that considers likely objections and the court standards that will apply to any requested modification or reformation.
We gather the original trust, amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and related correspondence to establish the factual background for the petition. Additional evidence such as prior drafts, financial records, or medical documentation may be compiled to support claims about intent or changed circumstances. Having a complete record allows us to draft a petition that clearly identifies the legal grounds and factual basis for the requested modification, increasing the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reducing the chance of procedural setbacks.
After assembling documents, we evaluate whether reformation, modification, decanting, or another option best aligns with your goals and the trust’s language. This assessment includes reviewing statutory authority, relevant case law, and the practical implications for beneficiaries and trustees. When a petition is recommended, we outline the necessary steps, estimated timeline, and required notices so you understand the process and can make an informed decision about proceeding with court action or pursuing a different route.
Once we determine filing is appropriate, we prepare a detailed petition that explains the factual background, legal basis for modification or reformation, and the precise changes requested. The petition typically includes proposed orders, declarations or affidavits from relevant witnesses, and exhibits such as copies of the trust and related documents. We ensure compliance with California procedural requirements and arrange for service of the petition on all required interested parties to allow for appropriate responses and potential settlement discussions before or during court proceedings.
Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses can provide essential factual support for the petition and explain the circumstances that justify modification. Exhibits such as prior drafts or financial statements help demonstrate the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. Clear, well-organized documentary support helps the court evaluate the request efficiently and minimizes disputes about foundational facts. We draft and assemble these materials carefully to present a coherent narrative that aligns with applicable legal standards.
After filing, we serve the petition on interested parties as required and monitor any responses or objections. In many matters, targeted negotiations with beneficiaries or co-trustees can resolve disagreements without a contested hearing. When settlement is not possible, we prepare to litigate by organizing evidence, preparing witnesses, and setting hearing dates. Keeping lines of communication open while advancing the petition often leads to more efficient outcomes than surprise litigation and helps manage costs and emotional strain on family relationships.
If objections arise that cannot be resolved, the court will schedule hearings where the parties present evidence and arguments. We represent clients at these hearings, addressing factual disputes and legal issues the judge identifies. When the court issues an order approving or denying modification, we assist with implementing the order through updated trust documents, filings, and communications with trustees and financial institutions. Proper follow-through ensures that the court’s decision is translated into effective administration and that trustees have the authority needed to carry out the trust’s terms.
At the hearing, declarations, documentary exhibits, and witness testimony help convince the court that the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or corrects an error. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and deliver clear legal arguments addressing statutory standards. Attention to procedural details and evidentiary preparation increases the likelihood that the court will issue a comprehensive order that resolves issues and provides trustees with workable authority to manage and distribute assets in accordance with the revised terms.
Once an order is entered, we assist in updating trust documents, notifying financial institutions, and taking any administrative steps required by the order. This may include recording amended documents, transferring accounts, or revising distribution procedures. Ensuring proper implementation eliminates confusion and helps trustees comply with the court’s directives. Clear documentation of these administrative steps protects trustees and beneficiaries and preserves the effectiveness of the modified trust for future administration and distribution.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate or superior court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when amendment outside court is not available or is contested. People consider filing when there are drafting errors, ambiguities, changed family circumstances, or when trustee powers are insufficient to accomplish needed actions. The petition explains the legal and factual basis for the requested change and seeks a court order to make the modification legally effective and enforceable. Filing a petition may be appropriate when informal solutions like a settlor-directed amendment or trustee decanting are unavailable or when interested parties cannot agree. The court process includes document review, serving notice to beneficiaries, and hearings if objections arise. Thoughtful preparation and clear documentation improve the odds of a favorable resolution and help ensure the trust functions according to the settlor’s intent moving forward.
In some situations a trustee may have authority within the trust document to make changes such as decanting assets into a new trust or exercising broad discretionary powers. When such powers are clearly granted, a trustee-led change can avoid court involvement and achieve updated terms more quickly. However, the trustee must carefully comply with statutory limits, duty-of-care obligations, and notice requirements to reduce the risk of later disputes by beneficiaries. When trustee authority is unclear, absent, or when beneficiaries object, a court petition may be necessary for a binding change. Petitioning the court provides judicial approval that clarifies trustee powers and reduces the potential for subsequent challenges. Determining whether a trustee can act without court approval requires close review of the trust language and applicable California law.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple uncontested matters can move relatively quickly, while contested petitions involving factual disputes or multiple beneficiaries can take many months or longer. Factors that influence timing include the need for discovery, scheduling of hearings, and time required for settlement negotiations if parties seek to resolve differences outside of court. Early, thorough preparation often shortens the process by reducing surprises and clarifying issues for the court. Providing complete documentation, engaging in pre-filing communications with beneficiaries when possible, and promptly responding to procedural requirements all contribute to a more efficient timeline. Your attorney can give a more specific estimate based on your trust’s facts and the local court’s calendar.
Courts consider the trust instrument itself, any amendments or restatements, and relevant extrinsic evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or declarations that illuminate the settlor’s intent. The court will also weigh declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, financial records, and any medical or other documentation that explains changed circumstances if those facts are part of the basis for modification. The legal standard varies depending on whether the petition seeks reformation, clarification, or another remedy under California law. Clear, admissible documentary support and credible witness declarations strengthen a petition by showing consistency with the settlor’s likely objectives. Courts focus on whether the proposed modification restores or honors the settlor’s intent or corrects an obvious drafting mistake. Presenting organized evidence and a coherent factual narrative enhances the court’s ability to evaluate the request fairly.
Yes. California procedure generally requires that interested parties, including beneficiaries and co-trustees, receive formal notice of a petition to modify a trust so they have an opportunity to respond. Proper service and notice are procedural prerequisites that ensure fairness and protect parties’ rights. Failure to provide required notice can lead to delays or the court setting aside an order, so careful attention to service rules is essential during the filing process. Providing notice can also open channels for negotiation that sometimes lead to settlements without a contested hearing. Documenting outreach and attempts to resolve issues can be persuasive to the court and may encourage reasonable resolutions among parties. Nonetheless, when disagreements persist, the court will consider objections at a hearing and issue a ruling based on the evidence and law.
Alternatives to filing a modification petition include executing a settlor-directed amendment if the settlor retains amendment power, trustee decanting when the trustee has statutory or contractual authority, or negotiating a private settlement among beneficiaries to amend or restate the trust. These options can be less costly and faster than court proceedings, and they preserve privacy by avoiding public filings. Each alternative requires careful analysis of the trust terms and applicable statutes to ensure the change is valid and defensible. When alternatives are unavailable or contested, mediation or collaborative negotiations often provide a middle ground that can avoid protracted litigation. Engaging in structured negotiations with clear documentation of agreements can achieve workable outcomes, but failure to reach a consensus may make a judicial petition the necessary next step to obtain a binding resolution.
A court-approved modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Alterations that affect ownership, control, or distribution timing may trigger tax considerations for the trust or beneficiaries. It is important to evaluate potential income tax, gift tax, and estate tax consequences before implementing changes that could materially affect tax liabilities. Consulting with financial and tax advisors alongside legal counsel helps identify and plan for tax consequences associated with proposed modifications. Coordinated planning ensures that the petition’s design minimizes unintended tax impacts and that any court-ordered changes are implemented in a manner consistent with broader financial and estate planning objectives.
Family disputes can complicate and lengthen the trust modification process when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes. Conflicting interests may lead to objections, discovery disputes, and contested hearings that increase costs and emotional strain. In such situations, representation that focuses on clear legal strategy, documentation, and open communication can help manage conflict and allow the court to resolve contested issues efficiently. When disputes are significant, alternative dispute resolution such as mediation may help parties find common ground without extensive litigation. Mediation can preserve relationships by focusing on mutually acceptable solutions, while a petition remains available to obtain a definitive court order when agreement is impossible. Balancing negotiation efforts with readiness to litigate is often the most practical approach.
It is possible to challenge a trust modification after a court rules, particularly if a party believes there was inadequate notice, procedural error, newly discovered evidence, or fraud. Challenges are typically subject to strict timelines and procedural requirements, and the grounds for overturning a final order can be limited. Courts usually require strong reasons and supporting evidence to revisit or set aside a prior decision. To minimize the risk of successful challenges, parties should ensure that all procedural rules are followed, notices are properly served, and the record is thorough. Clear documentation of the factual basis for modification and transparency with interested parties reduces the likelihood of later successful attacks on the court’s order.
Begin by gathering the trust document, any amendments, related estate planning papers, and relevant correspondence or prior drafts that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule a consultation so an attorney can review the materials, assess legal options, and outline the likely next steps, whether that means attempting an out-of-court resolution or preparing a petition for filing. During the initial consultation, the firm will discuss notice requirements, potential timelines, and what evidence may be necessary to substantiate the request. Based on this assessment, you can make an informed decision about pursuing a petition, exploring alternatives like decanting, or engaging in negotiated settlement efforts with beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas