A Heggstad petition is a court procedure used when property intended to be part of a trust was not formally retitled into the trust’s name, and a beneficiary or trustee asks the court to recognize the asset as trust property. For many families, this petition resolves ownership questions without undoing the trust or triggering undue delay. Residents of West Hills and surrounding Los Angeles County often find this process helpful after transfers or estate planning work that didn’t include complete paperwork. Understanding how a Heggstad petition works and what it can achieve helps families protect their goals and move forward with a smoother administration of trust assets.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition typically involves preparing a petition, presenting supporting evidence, and requesting the court to declare that property belongs to the trust despite not being formally titled in the trust’s name. The petition can address bank accounts, real property, stock holdings, and other assets where documentation shows an intent to make the trust the owner. For West Hills residents, a Heggstad petition can reduce estate administration delays and clarify asset ownership, which may lessen disputes among beneficiaries. Knowing the steps and likely outcomes helps people make informed decisions about whether to pursue this approach.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be an effective way to confirm that assets belong to a trust when formal retitling did not occur. This remedy reduces uncertainty about ownership and can streamline trust administration by allowing trustees to manage or distribute assets without protracted disputes. For families in West Hills, confirming trust ownership through the court can help avoid probate, clarify beneficiary rights, and allow timely access to funds or property needed for bills and ongoing care. While outcomes depend on documentation and circumstances, the petition often provides a practical path to honoring the settlor’s intentions and preserving estate planning goals.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services with a focus on clear communication and practical solutions. Serving clients across California, including West Hills and the greater Los Angeles area, the firm handles matters such as trust funding issues, Heggstad petitions, and related estate tasks. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, transaction records, and other evidence to build a persuasive position for the court when a retitling oversight has occurred. Clients appreciate a steady, organized process that prioritizes preserving the settlor’s intentions and minimizing delays in settling an estate or administering trust assets.
A Heggstad petition addresses situations in which property was intended to be included in a trust but was never formally transferred on title documents. The petition asks the court to recognize the trust as the rightful owner based on written instructions, transfer documents, or other evidence demonstrating the transfer intent. In California, courts look for clear signs that the asset was meant to belong to the trust, such as trust provisions, promissory notes, bank communications, or contemporaneous writings. For West Hills residents, the petition can be an important tool to avoid probate and allow trustees to carry out the settlor’s plan without unnecessary delay.
The Heggstad petition process typically begins with a thorough document review to collect proof of intent and any actions taken to fund the trust. Evidence might include trust language, drafting notes, transaction history, correspondence with financial institutions, and deeds or transfer paperwork. The petition is filed in appropriate court and may be uncontested or require a hearing if beneficiaries or interested parties challenge the request. Throughout the process, clear factual documentation and consistent testimony increase the likelihood the court will grant the requested relief and deem the asset part of the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a California court filing that asks a judge to declare that specific property should be treated as owned by a trust despite not being formally retitled. The court evaluates written evidence that shows the settlor’s intent and any actions taken toward transferring the asset, looking for a demonstrated plan to include the property in the trust. Judges weigh documentation and testimony to determine whether the trust’s instructions and the settlor’s conduct align. Successful petitions hinge on credible documentary evidence and coherence between the trust terms and the surrounding transfer activities, which together support judicial recognition of trust ownership.
Essential elements of a Heggstad petition include demonstrable intent to transfer, contemporaneous documents supporting the transfer, and a clear connection between the asset and the trust terms. The typical process involves collecting the trust, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any transfer-related notes. Once the petition is prepared and filed, interested parties are notified and the court may schedule a hearing. If the petition is supported by convincing documentation and no valid claims oppose it, the judge can sign an order confirming the trust’s ownership of the asset. Careful preparation and factual clarity are important at every step.
This glossary provides plain-language definitions of common terms encountered when pursuing a Heggstad petition. Understanding these terms helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow the process and communicate effectively with counsel and the court. The definitions below cover basic concepts such as trust funding, transfer documents, petition filings, and judicial orders. If terms remain unclear, requesting an explanation tailored to the specific facts of a case can make the path forward more transparent and reduce confusion during trust administration or court proceedings.
Funding the trust refers to the act of transferring ownership of assets from an individual into a trust so the trustee can manage or distribute them according to the trust terms. Funding can involve changing title on real property, retitling bank or brokerage accounts, assigning ownership of business interests, or executing beneficiary designations consistent with the trust. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to confirm that an asset intended for the trust should be treated as part of the trust’s estate, based on evidence of the transfer intent and the settlor’s instructions.
A petition to determine trust ownership is a legal request asking the court to declare that particular property belongs to the trust despite a gap in formal retitling. The petition sets out facts showing intent to fund the trust and often includes copies of the trust document, related correspondence, and transaction records. The court examines whether the evidence demonstrates that the settlor intended the trust to own the property, and if satisfied, may enter an order recognizing the trust’s ownership, allowing trustees to proceed with management or distribution under the trust’s terms.
Settlor intent refers to what the person who created the trust intended regarding the disposition and ownership of assets. Courts consider the settlor’s intent when deciding whether an asset should be treated as trust property, especially in Heggstad petition cases. Evidence of intent may include the trust document itself, drafting notes, declaration of trust language, transfer instructions, or communications with financial institutions. Clear, contemporaneous documentation that indicates the settlor meant the trust to own an asset strengthens the case for a favorable court determination.
A court order confirming trust title is the judicial ruling that formally recognizes an asset as belonging to the trust even though title was not correctly changed. This order clarifies ownership for banks, title companies, and other institutions, allowing trustees to manage, sell, or transfer the asset under the trust’s terms. The order is especially useful when financial institutions require proof of ownership or when beneficiaries need clarity to move forward with administration. Such an order resolves disputes and helps enforce the settlor’s plan.
When addressing assets that were intended for a trust but not formally retitled, several approaches are available. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership based on evidence of intent, while alternatives include initiating probate, pursuing informal settlement among heirs, or attempting to have institutions accept documentation without court involvement. Probate can be more time-consuming and public, while informal solutions may work only if all parties agree. Choosing the best route depends on the asset type, the relationships among interested parties, and the strength of documentation supporting the trust funding.
A limited approach may be sufficient when documentary evidence strongly supports the trust ownership and all interested parties are cooperative. If the bank, title company, or beneficiaries agree with the evidence and the matter can be resolved through a simple declaration or administrative correction, a formal court proceeding may be unnecessary. This route can save time and expense, and it often works when the asset’s transfer history and trust paperwork leave little room for dispute. Still, parties should be cautious and seek confirmation in writing to prevent future disagreements about the assertion of trust ownership.
A limited approach can work well when there is minimal risk of a challenge from heirs or creditors. If no beneficiaries stand to benefit from contesting the asset’s inclusion in the trust and creditors are not claiming a competing interest, the parties involved may accept the documentation and proceed without a court order. This path is often faster and less formal, but it depends on the willingness of institutions and parties to accept the evidence. Where uncertainty or potential claims exist, seeking a court determination can provide more durable protection.
A formal Heggstad petition is often necessary when beneficiaries disagree about whether an asset belongs to the trust or when creditors or other parties assert competing rights. In such circumstances, a court ruling brings finality and clear direction for trustees, financial institutions, and heirs. Litigation can address factual disputes, weigh the significance of documents, and provide an enforceable order that institutions respect. Pursuing a petition helps prevent ongoing disputes and allows trustees to follow the settlor’s wishes with judicial backing when voluntary resolution is not possible.
There are times when institutions require an enforceable court order before transferring or releasing assets, especially with real property or large accounts. A Heggstad petition provides a formal judicial determination that financial institutions and title carriers will recognize. This approach reduces the risk of later disputes and protects trustees who need to manage or distribute assets without personal exposure to claims. When clear documentation alone is not sufficient to satisfy third parties, obtaining a court order can be the most reliable means to achieve the settlor’s objectives.
A comprehensive approach using a Heggstad petition offers certainty and legal protection by creating a court order that clarifies asset ownership. This certainty helps trustees manage accounts, sell property, or distribute proceeds in accordance with the trust, without fear of later challenges. For families in West Hills, the order can simplify interactions with banks, title companies, and other institutions that require definitive proof. While the process involves preparation and possible hearings, the ultimate result provides a durable resolution that supports the settlor’s plan and reduces the risk of prolonged disputes among beneficiaries.
Another key benefit of a formal petition is that it creates a public record reflecting the court’s determination, which third parties must respect. This record helps prevent subsequent contests and provides clarity to successor trustees and beneficiaries. Additionally, the petition process encourages careful documentation and review, ensuring that all relevant facts are presented to the court. The methodical nature of the proceeding also gives trustees a structured path to follow, reducing uncertainty during trust administration and helping ensure distributions are carried out as intended by the settlor.
One major advantage of obtaining a court order through a Heggstad petition is the legal finality it provides. Financial institutions and title companies are far more likely to accept a judicial order than informal assurances, which reduces delays in accessing or transferring assets. When trustees need to sell property or access accounts to pay expenses, having an enforceable order removes ambiguity and helps prevent refusal by third parties. This clarity also lowers the risk that trustees will face liability for acting on incomplete information while administering the trust.
Securing a court determination through a Heggstad petition tends to diminish the likelihood of future litigation over the same asset because the order resolves ownership questions on the record. Interested parties who might otherwise have grounds to dispute the transfer are confronted with an official ruling that supports trust administration. This deterrence can save families time, stress, and expense down the road by reducing the chance of successive challenges. A decisive resolution helps preserve relationships and allows beneficiaries to focus on implementing the settlor’s wishes rather than prosecuting repeated disputes.
Start by collecting all documents that reflect the settlor’s intent at the time the trust was created and when the asset transfer was planned. Useful items include the trust document, drafting notes, bank statements, deeds, correspondence with financial institutions, and any signed transfer instructions. Contemporaneous records that show steps taken toward funding the trust strengthen a petition. Organizing this evidence chronologically makes it easier to present a coherent narrative to the court and increases the chances that a petition will be accepted and a favorable order entered.
Even when documentation is strong, be prepared for the possibility of a court hearing where witnesses or affidavits may need to explain the circumstances surrounding the transfer. Preparing clear affidavits, identifying witnesses who can corroborate the settlor’s intent, and organizing exhibits will help present a persuasive case. Anticipating questions the court may have and addressing potential weak points in the record ahead of time can improve the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduce the chance of continued litigation after the order is entered.
Residents may consider a Heggstad petition when property was intended for a trust but remains titled in the individual’s name, which can obstruct trust administration and access to funds. Common triggers include transfers that were started but not completed, title issues with real estate, or accounts where beneficiary designations were inconsistent with trust planning. When timely access to assets is necessary to pay debts, medical expenses, or to distribute funds to beneficiaries, a petition can clarify ownership and allow trustees to act efficiently and in accordance with the trust’s provisions.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to prevent assets from entering probate solely because of a retitling oversight. Probate can be time-consuming, public, and costly; a Heggstad petition offers a pathway to maintain the trust’s benefits by securing a court declaration that the asset belongs to the trust. For families seeking continuity and reduced administrative burdens, this procedure can protect the settlor’s intent and streamline the process of settling estates, particularly when documentation supports the trust funding despite the lack of formal title transfer.
Typical circumstances prompting a petition include recently created trusts where some assets were overlooked, death of a settlor before title changes were completed, miscommunication with financial institutions about retitling, or misplaced deeds and transfer documents. Other common situations involve stock or brokerage accounts not retitled at account opening, retirements accounts with conflicting beneficiary designations, or real property where deeds were not recorded in the trust name. Each scenario requires careful documentation review and, in many cases, a court determination to clear title for trust administration.
Real property is often overlooked when funding a trust, especially if the settlor believed a deed had been recorded or relied on a title company to complete the transfer. When a property remains in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad petition can invite the court to recognize that the settlor intended the trust to hold the property, based on deeds, escrow instructions, tax records, or related correspondence. A court order clarifying ownership helps trustees sell, refinance, or manage the property under the trust’s terms without resorting to probate, provided the evidence supports the claim.
Financial accounts are another frequent source of trouble when trusts are created but accounts are not retitled. Accounts intended to belong to the trust can remain in the individual’s name due to oversight or changes in bank procedures. A petition supported by account statements, transfer forms, and communications with the institution can persuade the court to treat the funds as trust property. This route helps trustees access required funds to cover estate expenses and distribute assets according to the trust document, avoiding delays that could affect beneficiaries.
In some cases, the settlor executed transfer documents, assignment language, or promissory notes that clearly show an intention to fund the trust even though title was not changed. These documents, along with the trust itself and supporting correspondence, can form the basis for a Heggstad petition. Courts evaluate the totality of the record to determine whether the settlor intended the trust to own the asset. When that intent is evident in contemporaneous writings, the petition offers a useful means to align formal ownership with the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in West Hills and across Los Angeles County, helping families resolve trust funding issues and pursue Heggstad petitions when necessary. We focus on gathering relevant documents, preparing clear petitions, and guiding clients through court procedures when a judicial determination is the best available path. Whether dealing with real property, bank accounts, or other assets, our role is to present a complete factual record to the court so trustees can proceed with confidence in administering the trust in accordance with the settlor’s intentions.
Selecting the right legal assistance for a Heggstad petition matters because the process requires attention to documentary detail and an understanding of how courts evaluate intent and transfer evidence. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman emphasizes careful preparation, thorough evidence gathering, and clear presentation to the court. We help clients compile deeds, account records, correspondence, and affidavits to create a persuasive record. Our goal is to obtain a court order that allows trustees to carry out the trust’s directives without unnecessary delay or exposure to later challenges.
We provide personalized guidance on whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative approach is appropriate for each situation. Some matters can be resolved administratively, while others require court determination. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of the available paths, explain likely timelines and costs, and work with clients to select the best option. Clear communication and practical planning help ensure decisions are aligned with family priorities and the settlor’s intentions, reducing surprises as the trust is administered and assets are handled.
Throughout the process, our team coordinates with financial institutions, title companies, and beneficiaries to present facts in a coherent, well-documented manner. When hearings are necessary, we prepare affidavits, exhibits, and witness statements that address the issues the court will consider. This level of preparation helps reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings and supports a focused resolution. For West Hills families seeking a reliable path to confirm trust ownership, having thorough representation helps ensure the settlor’s plan is honored and assets are managed appropriately.
Our process begins with an initial document review to identify the evidence supporting trust ownership. We gather the trust document, deeds, account statements, transfer instructions, communications with institutions, and any contemporaneous notes that demonstrate intent. After evaluating the record, we advise whether an administrative resolution is feasible or whether filing a Heggstad petition is the most reliable course. If a petition is needed, we prepare the filing, serve interested parties, and represent the case at any necessary hearings, all while keeping clients informed about timing and possible outcomes.
The first step is a comprehensive collection of documents and an assessment of the legal and factual strengths of the claim. We request copies of the trust, deeds, account statements, closing instructions, correspondence with financial institutions, and any other writings that show the settlor’s intention to fund the trust. This detailed review identifies potential gaps in the record and supports a recommendation on whether a petition will likely succeed. Organizing evidence early makes subsequent filings clearer and more persuasive to the court.
We request and review the trust document, relevant deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, and any documents that reference the transfer of the asset. These records can establish a consistent narrative showing the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. When documents are missing, we identify alternative sources such as escrow records, title company notes, or email correspondence that can supplement the record. A thorough and organized compilation provides the strongest foundation for moving forward with a petition or an alternative resolution.
We identify all interested parties, including beneficiaries, co-owners, and potential creditors, and consider how each might respond to a petition. Understanding likely objections and the parties’ positions allows us to prepare effective responses and determine whether negotiation or immediate filing is preferable. Early identification of contested issues supports a strategy tailored to resolve disputes efficiently, whether through settlement or court proceedings. Accurate assessment of the landscape helps reduce surprises and informs realistic expectations about timelines and potential outcomes.
If the assessment supports court action, we prepare a detailed petition outlining the facts, supporting exhibits, and legal arguments for treating the asset as trust property. The filing includes declarations or affidavits from witnesses or interested parties, along with documentary evidence arranged to show the settlor’s intent. We ensure proper service on all required parties and meet procedural requirements to avoid delays. Clear and well-supported filings increase the likelihood the court will be willing to enter a determinate order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the asset.
Our team drafts the petition and supporting affidavits that present the narrative of intent and the documentary proof. Affidavits may come from trustees, witnesses, or institutional representatives who can corroborate the steps taken to fund the trust. Exhibits are organized to align with the factual chronology, and legal points are framed to address the court’s standard for Heggstad relief. Careful drafting helps the court quickly understand the basis for the petition and increases the chance of a favorable determination without unnecessary hearings where possible.
After finalizing the petition and exhibits, we file the documents with the appropriate court and serve copies on all interested parties in accordance with procedural rules. Proper service ensures the court has jurisdiction to make a determination and allows parties the opportunity to respond. Prompt and accurate service avoids procedural defects that could delay the matter. We track deadlines, prepare responses to likely objections, and communicate with parties and counsel to explore opportunities for stipulation or streamlined hearings when appropriate.
If a hearing is scheduled, we present the evidence and respond to any opposition or questions from the judge. Hearings vary depending on the complexity and whether objections exist. When the court finds the documentation persuasive, it may enter an order declaring the asset to be trust property, enabling trustees to act on the order. If the court requests further proofs or clarifications, we respond accordingly and seek the most efficient route to resolution. Once an order is entered, we assist with obtaining the institutional acceptance needed to effectuate transfers or distributions.
At a hearing, the court will review affidavits, documentary exhibits, and any testimony offered to establish the settlor’s intent and the steps taken toward funding the trust. We focus on presenting a clear, chronological story supported by relevant documents and witness statements. Addressing anticipated questions and clarifying any apparent discrepancies in the record helps the judge reach a reasoned decision. The hearing is an opportunity to resolve uncertainties and to demonstrate why the court should treat the asset as belonging to the trust under applicable California law.
If the court rules in favor of the petition, it will enter an order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the specified asset. We then assist in providing the order to banks, title companies, or other institutions to effect transfers or facilitate sales and distributions. Where additional steps are needed to clear title or update records, we guide trustees through those formalities. The court order provides the legal foundation trustees need to manage trust assets responsibly and to proceed with administration in accordance with the settlor’s instructions.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing that asks the court to recognize that certain property belongs to a trust even though it was not formally retitled. It is typically used when a settlor intended for the trust to hold the asset but a gap in paperwork or title transfer prevented the asset from being placed in the trust name. The petition presents documentary evidence and declarations to show the settlor’s intent and the steps taken toward funding the trust, allowing the court to enter an order that clarifies ownership. This remedy is particularly useful for closing administrative gaps that would otherwise force an asset into probate or create uncertainty during trust administration. By securing a court order, trustees can manage, sell, or distribute the asset under the terms of the trust with institutional acceptance and reduced exposure to later disputes. The process hinges on clear documentation and a well-organized factual presentation to the court.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors such as court schedules, whether the petition is contested, and the completeness of the supporting documentation. In uncontested matters where evidence is clear and parties are cooperative, it may be possible to obtain a resolution more quickly. However, contested matters that require hearings and additional proofs can extend the timeline significantly. Preparing a complete and organized filing at the outset helps prevent delays. Delays can also arise when institutions require particular forms of evidence or when additional discovery is needed to gather missing documents. Early document collection and careful attention to procedural requirements reduce the likelihood of avoidable setbacks and help the matter move forward efficiently once filed.
The most persuasive evidence for a Heggstad petition is contemporaneous documentation that connects the asset to the trust and demonstrates the settlor’s intent. Helpful items include the trust document itself, deeds, escrow instructions, account statements showing transfers or instructions to retitle, emails or letters discussing funding, and signed forms that indicate a plan to place the asset in the trust. Affidavits from individuals who were involved in the transactions can also corroborate the facts. A coherent chronological narrative that links these documents is critical. Courts assess the totality of the record to determine whether the settlor intended the trust to own the property. Where direct documentary proof is limited, consistent statements and corroborating exhibits can strengthen a petition, but stronger contemporaneous evidence generally increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
A successful Heggstad petition can help avoid probate for the specific asset at issue by obtaining a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust, not the decedent’s probate estate. When assets are recognized as trust property, trustees can manage or distribute them according to the trust terms without the need to open probate for those items. This outcome preserves many of the privacy and efficiency benefits associated with trusts compared to probate administration. However, not every asset or situation will be resolved without probate; the petition’s success depends on the strength of the documentation and the absence of competing claims that require separate resolution. When probate is otherwise unavoidable, the petition may still provide clarity for certain assets and reduce the scope of probate proceedings.
Not every Heggstad petition requires a contested court hearing. If documentation is strong and all interested parties agree with the facts, the court may resolve the matter on the papers or schedule a short hearing. In practice, uncontested petitions supported by clear evidence often move more quickly and require less court time. When no objections are filed and the petition is well-documented, a judge can enter an order without a full adversarial proceeding. When beneficiaries or creditors object, or when records are incomplete, hearings are more likely. Parties should be prepared to present testimony and respond to questions from the judge. Proper preparation and careful filing help reduce the chance of protracted litigation, but being ready for a hearing is prudent when disputes are possible.
Financial institutions and title companies generally respond to a valid court order by accepting it as proof of the trust’s ownership and updating their records accordingly. Banks often require certified copies of the order and may have internal procedures to review judicial determinations before releasing funds or changing account titles. Title companies usually accept a recorded order or other official documentation when clearing title for sale or transfer of real property. Because institutional policies vary, having clear, court-approved documentation streamlines interactions and reduces further back-and-forth. Trustees should expect to provide certified orders and additional paperwork as requested to complete transfers, and the court order typically provides the legal foundation institutions require to act.
Failing to pursue a Heggstad petition when funding is incomplete can leave assets vulnerable to probate, delay access to necessary funds, and create uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. Without a court declaration, institutions may refuse to transfer or release assets, and disputes among heirs can escalate into costly litigation. These outcomes can undermine the settlor’s planning goals and prolong estate administration, increasing stress for families during an already difficult period. Additionally, unresolved title issues may interfere with the timely sale or refinancing of property, complicate ongoing care expenses, and create exposure for trustees who act without clear legal authority. Seeking resolution through a court determination when documentation warrants it helps reduce these risks and enables trustees to proceed with appropriate steps under the trust.
Disputes among beneficiaries can lead to objections that prolong a Heggstad petition, but having strong documentary proof and a clear narrative of the settlor’s intent reduces the likelihood that such objections will succeed. Courts evaluate evidence rather than mere disagreements and will consider the documentation and testimony presented. When conflicts arise, the court’s role is to weigh competing claims and decide whether the trust should be recognized as the owner of the asset in question. Where disputes are anticipated, early communication and efforts to resolve differences can sometimes limit contested issues. If resolution is not possible, the judicial process provides a forum to resolve ownership conclusively, though contested cases typically take longer and may require additional evidentiary steps.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include attempting administrative corrections with financial institutions, negotiating a written agreement among beneficiaries, or pursuing a declaratory action with different procedural framing. In some cases, banks or title companies will accept sufficient documentation and a trustee’s affidavit to effect a change without court involvement. Informal resolution is possible when all parties and institutions agree and the documentation is persuasive. However, these alternatives depend on cooperation and institutional policies. When institutions insist on judicial confirmation or when disputes exist among parties, pursuing a formal petition provides the greatest certainty and durable protection. Evaluating the strengths of available alternatives is part of the initial case assessment.
Preparing for a potential Heggstad petition begins with gathering all relevant documents related to the trust and the asset, including the trust instrument, deed or account statements, escrow instructions, drafting notes, communications with financial institutions, and any signed transfer documents. Creating a clear timeline that links the trust’s creation and the steps taken to transfer the asset helps craft a persuasive narrative. Early organization reduces the time needed to prepare filings and identifies any gaps that require further inquiry. It is also helpful to identify and contact potential witnesses who can corroborate the settlor’s intent, and to notify interested parties about the planned approach. Preparing affidavits and obtaining institution records early can speed the process and increase the chance of an efficient resolution, whether administrative or judicial.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas