A general assignment of assets to trust is a practical legal document used to transfer ownership of certain assets from an individual to a living trust when immediate formal funding of the trust is not possible. This instrument serves as a temporary means to direct assets into the trust’s control, helping ensure continuity of management and avoiding probate delays. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients in West Puente Valley with clear procedures for preparing and executing these assignments to align with their overall estate plans, including related documents such as revocable living trusts and pour-over wills.
Many individuals pursue a general assignment when they form a trust but cannot yet retitle bank accounts, real property, or investment accounts into the trust’s name. This document records intent and can be recognized by financial institutions, beneficiaries, and courts as part of a complete estate plan. Our approach emphasizes careful review of asset records, coordination with trustee duties, and ensuring accompanying documents like powers of attorney and health care directives are consistent with the assignment. The result is a smoother transition of asset control and greater clarity for family members managing affairs.
A properly drafted general assignment of assets to trust reduces the risk of assets becoming subject to probate, provides a written record of intent to fund the trust, and supports continuity in asset management if incapacity arises. It can be especially helpful for assets that are hard to retitle immediately, or when coordinating multiple account types. This document complements a full funding plan and can simplify interactions with banks and brokers. In combination with a pour-over will, powers of attorney, and trust certification, a general assignment strengthens overall estate administration and reduces ambiguity for loved ones during a stressful time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized estate planning services to residents of West Puente Valley and surrounding communities in Los Angeles County. Our attorneys work closely with clients to design trust funding strategies that reflect individual circumstances, whether the estate plan requires a general assignment as a bridge to retitling assets or a full transfer. We emphasize responsive communication, attention to detail, and practical solutions tailored to family needs, including drafting revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and trust certifications to ensure a cohesive and effective plan.
A general assignment of assets to trust is a recorded declaration by the trustmaker that certain personal property or accounts are to be treated as trust assets. It does not always replace formal retitling but serves as clear evidence of intent and can be used to guide trustees, financial institutions, and probate courts. The assignment typically identifies the trust by name and date and lists asset categories or specific items. When combined with related estate planning documents like a pour-over will and trust certification, it helps ensure assets are managed and distributed according to the trustmaker’s wishes.
This document often addresses movable personal property and accounts that may be difficult to retitle promptly, offering a temporary but legally significant step in trust funding. It can be used for bank accounts, brokerage accounts, certificates, and other assets where owners wish to avoid immediate probate exposure. While some assets, such as real property and retirement accounts, typically require formal transfer procedures, a general assignment still provides clarity that those assets are intended to be administered under the trust. The assignment is an important piece of a practical funding strategy.
A general assignment is a written instrument that records the settlor’s intent to assign specified assets to a living trust. It commonly includes identifying information about the trust, the assignor, and a description of assets or asset categories. The document can be signed and notarized to increase its formality and acceptance. While not a substitute for full retitling in all circumstances, it creates an official record showing the trustmaker’s direction for property management and distribution, which can be valuable evidence for trustees, financial institutions, or courts during estate administration.
A typical general assignment includes the trust name and date, the assignor’s identifying information, a clear statement assigning assets to the trust, and signatures with notarization as appropriate. The process generally starts with an inventory of assets, drafting the assignment to reflect those holdings, and executing the document in accordance with California legal formalities. After execution, the assignment should be stored with the trust documents and made available to the successor trustee. Where necessary, additional follow-up steps include contacting financial institutions to confirm acceptance and retitling assets when feasible.
Understanding the terminology used in trust funding helps clients make informed decisions. Terms such as trust funding, pour-over will, trust certification, revocable living trust, and assignment each carry specific meanings in estate planning. Clear definitions reduce confusion when preparing documents, communicating with institutions, and during trust administration. The following glossary entries explain common concepts and how they relate to a general assignment of assets to a trust, providing practical context for clients and family members involved in implementing an estate plan.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning instrument that holds legal title to assets under terms established by the trustmaker while allowing changes or revocation during lifetime. It names a trustee to manage trust assets and successor trustees to handle administration after incapacity or death. Funding the trust involves transferring assets into its name, and when immediate retitling is impractical, a general assignment can serve as a temporary measure to document intent to treat certain assets as trust property. The trust supports privacy and can reduce probate exposure when properly funded.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name at death to be transferred into their trust. It serves as a safety net for assets not formally retitled into the trust before death. While a pour-over will usually must go through probate to transfer those assets, it ensures that the trust’s terms ultimately govern distribution. A general assignment of assets to trust works alongside a pour-over will to minimize the number of assets needing probate and to document intent during the trustmaker’s lifetime.
A trust certification is a summary document that provides proof of a trust’s existence and the authority of a named trustee without disclosing the trust’s full terms. Financial institutions often accept a certification to confirm transaction authority, such as cashing checks or managing accounts on behalf of the trust. When presenting a general assignment, a trust certification can help show that assets are intended for trust administration, facilitating interactions with banks and brokers while preserving confidentiality of the trust’s contents.
A power of attorney is a legal document that designates an agent to manage financial or legal matters on behalf of the grantor during incapacity or while the grantor is unavailable. It often accompanies a trust and general assignment to ensure continuity in asset management. When a trustee or agent needs to take steps to retitle or manage assets, a valid power of attorney can authorize necessary transactions. Coordination between powers of attorney and trust documents ensures decisions align with the trustmaker’s wishes and provide a consistent plan for managing property.
Choosing between a general assignment and immediate retitling depends on asset types, administrative burdens, and timing. Full retitling transfers title into the trust and eliminates ambiguity, but it can be time-consuming and require institutional cooperation. A general assignment offers a practical interim solution that records intent and eases administration when immediate retitling is not feasible. In many cases, a thoughtful combination of assignment and planned retitling provides the best balance between legal clarity and administrative convenience, supported by related documents like pour-over wills and trust certifications.
There are circumstances where a temporary approach is sensible, such as when financial institutions require additional documentation or when real property title changes are delayed by administrative processes. A general assignment records the trustmaker’s intent to include those assets while allowing time to obtain required paperwork. This avoids leaving assets ambiguously titled during important life events or unexpected incapacity. The assignment provides a documented plan that trustees and family members can rely on while long-term retitling is completed, reducing potential disputes and uncertainty.
Some assets, such as small personal property or accounts with limited balances, may present little probate risk but still be cumbersome to retitle in the short term. When the administrative cost of immediate retitling outweighs the benefit, a general assignment can record intent and include these items within the trust’s scope without creating undue paperwork. This approach balances practicality with estate planning goals by ensuring the trust’s terms will govern distribution while allowing the trustmaker to prioritize retitling of higher-value or more complex assets first.
A comprehensive approach is often advisable when the estate includes real property, business interests, retirement accounts, or titled securities that require formal transfer procedures. In these situations, fully retitling assets into the trust or arranging beneficiary designations and account rulings can reduce probate exposure and provide clearer administration. The process may involve deed preparation, beneficiary form updates, and coordination with financial institutions and retirement plan administrators. A full funding strategy helps ensure that each asset is handled in the way that best preserves the trustmaker’s intent and reduces post-death complications.
When a trust includes detailed distribution provisions, ongoing trusts for beneficiaries, or multiple contingent beneficiaries, a comprehensive funding plan helps ensure assets are placed in the trust with the appropriate titles and provisions in place. Proper funding prevents mismatches between the trust’s terms and the assets available for distribution, reducing the risk of conflicts or unintended results. Coordinating retitling, beneficiary designations, and trust provisions in a cohesive plan supports clear administration and facilitates the trustee’s ability to carry out the trustmaker’s intentions.
A comprehensive funding plan seeks to retitle key assets into the trust, align beneficiary designations with trust terms, and minimize the need for probate. This approach increases clarity for successors and reduces administrative burdens after incapacity or death. When assets are properly titled and documentation is coordinated, trustees can more easily manage and distribute property according to the trust terms. Comprehensive funding is particularly beneficial for real estate holdings, business ownership interests, and investment accounts where title and beneficiary designations directly impact administration and control.
Beyond reducing probate exposure, a full funding strategy can help preserve privacy, because assets held in trust generally avoid public probate records. It also simplifies successor trustee duties, allowing them to rely on clear title and documentation when managing and distributing assets. While achieving complete funding may require additional steps and institutional coordination, the long-term benefits include reduced uncertainty, fewer disputes among beneficiaries, and a smoother administration process that better reflects the trustmaker’s intentions for asset distribution and care of dependents.
Fully funding a trust reduces the likelihood that assets will be subject to probate, which can save time and expense for beneficiaries and preserve privacy for the estate. Clear title and documentation allow the trustee to exercise authority over trust property without court involvement in many cases. This streamlined control makes it easier to address immediate needs after incapacity or death, such as paying bills and managing ongoing affairs, without the delays and public exposure associated with probate proceedings.
When assets are properly titled to reflect the trust’s terms, successor trustees can manage and distribute property with greater certainty and less conflict. Clear documentation reduces ambiguity that can lead to disagreements among family members about how assets should be handled. A cohesive funding plan aligns accounts, deeds, and beneficiary forms with the trustmaker’s intentions, which simplifies administration and lowers the risk of contested estates, ensuring a more orderly and respectful transition for heirs and loved ones.
Begin by preparing a complete inventory of assets intended for the trust, including bank accounts, investment accounts, personal property, and any items that are difficult to retitle. Accurate records help determine which assets may require immediate retitling and which can be covered temporarily by a general assignment. Including account numbers, institutional contacts, and documentation status in the inventory simplifies subsequent steps and communication with successor trustees and family members, reducing confusion during transitions.
Ensure that a general assignment is integrated with the rest of the estate plan, including a pour-over will, powers of attorney, health care directive, and trust certification. This alignment provides clarity on authority and intent in the event of incapacity or death. Storing all related documents together and informing successor trustees of their location reduces delays and ensures a coordinated approach to trust funding and administration, making transitions smoother for those responsible for implementing the plan.
Consider a general assignment when you have established a revocable living trust but cannot immediately retitle all assets into the trust due to institutional requirements, timing, or administrative delays. It provides a practical interim record of intent to include specific assets in the trust, and helps ensure those assets will be treated consistently with the overall estate plan. This can be particularly useful for personal property and certain account types where immediate retitling would be burdensome or face temporary obstacles.
A general assignment can also be appropriate when coordinating estate plans with successors or when preparing for potential incapacity, as it clarifies the trustmaker’s wishes and supports trustee authority. It should be used as part of a broader funding strategy that identifies assets requiring immediate attention and those that can be addressed later. By documenting intent and providing a path for subsequent retitling, the assignment helps reduce ambiguity and supports more efficient administration for family members and trustees.
Common circumstances include recently created trusts where owners have yet to complete retitling, assets held in accounts that require additional documentation for transfer, and situations where immediate retitling would create undue administrative burden. It is also useful when clients travel or are temporarily unavailable to sign transfer paperwork, or when property is spread across multiple institutions requiring time to coordinate. A general assignment provides clarity and continuity while these more detailed steps are completed.
When a trust is newly established, owners may not have had time to retitle every asset into the trust’s name. A general assignment records the intent to fund the trust and can be used to cover assets that remain in the individual’s name temporarily. This helps ensure that the trustmaker’s instructions are documented and available to trustees and family members, reducing the chance that assets are overlooked or treated inconsistently with the trust’s provisions.
Certain accounts and institutions request additional forms, background documentation, or legal review before agreeing to retitle assets into a trust. These requirements can create delays that leave assets in the individual’s name longer than intended. A general assignment provides interim documentation of intent and can help institutions understand the trustmaker’s plans while they process retitling forms, enabling better coordination and continuity of asset management during the interim period.
Some types of property, including vehicles, personal collections, or small business holdings, may require additional paperwork or valuation before they can be transferred into a trust. When immediate retitling is impractical, a general assignment records the trustmaker’s intent and helps successor trustees understand that these assets are intended to be administered under the trust. This can reduce disputes and provide a clear starting point for subsequent transfer actions when circumstances allow.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local estate planning services in West Puente Valley, assisting residents with trust formation, funding strategies, and related documents. We offer guidance on preparing general assignments, pour-over wills, trust certifications, powers of attorney, health care directives, and other essentials of a complete estate plan. Our goal is to help clients organize their affairs in a way that reflects their priorities, reduces future burdens on family members, and provides a clear roadmap for trustees and loved ones to follow during administration.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for practical, client-focused estate planning services that address both the legal documents and the administrative steps necessary to fund a trust. We prioritize clear communication, timely follow-up with institutions, and careful documentation so clients understand what is required to protect their wishes. Whether drafting a general assignment as a temporary measure or coordinating full retitling of assets, we assist with the procedural details that often determine how smoothly a trust functions when it is needed most.
Our firm emphasizes realistic planning that accounts for the many types of property individuals hold and the different institutional procedures those assets may require. We work with clients to prepare inventories, draft cohesive documents, and develop a funding timeline that addresses high-priority assets first. By providing comprehensive document packages and guidance on interacting with financial institutions, we help reduce the administrative load on clients and their family members during times of transition.
We also focus on ensuring that documents such as the general assignment, trust certification, pour-over will, and powers of attorney are consistent and accessible when needed. Clear labeling and storage of original documents, along with instructions for successor trustees, help make the process of trust administration more efficient and less stressful for loved ones. Our approach aims to preserve the trustmaker’s intentions and to support orderly asset management in the future.
Our process begins with a consultation to review existing estate planning documents, inventory assets, and identify which items require immediate attention. We draft a general assignment tailored to the client’s trust and asset mix, coordinate with institutions when necessary, and provide guidance on retitling priority assets. We also prepare complementary documents such as trust certifications and pour-over wills to ensure a cohesive plan. Throughout the process we keep clients informed of timelines and next steps to reduce uncertainty and ensure orderly administration in the future.
The initial stage involves reviewing the trust document, existing wills, powers of attorney, and any beneficiary designations to assess funding needs. We help clients compile a detailed asset inventory that identifies accounts, deeds, and personal property, and note each asset’s transfer requirements. This assessment determines which assets can be retitled immediately and which may be covered by a general assignment as an interim measure, enabling a prioritized approach to trust funding focused on immediate risk and administrative feasibility.
We examine the revocable living trust, pour-over will, and any existing powers of attorney to confirm that the trustmaker’s instructions are coherent and to identify potential conflicts. This review clarifies who the trustee and successor trustees are, how distributions are structured, and whether any beneficiary designations need updating. Understanding the full document set allows us to draft a general assignment that aligns with the estate plan and to recommend specific retitling steps for assets that present the highest administrative priority.
We assist clients in compiling a comprehensive asset inventory that includes account numbers, institutional contacts, and documentation status for each asset. This practical checklist identifies which accounts require additional documentation for transfer, which can be covered by an assignment temporarily, and which must be retitled immediately. The inventory becomes a roadmap for funding the trust and helps successor trustees locate important items quickly, reducing delays and administrative burdens during transition.
After identifying the assets and discussing priorities, we draft a general assignment tailored to the trust and the client’s needs. The document names the trust, specifies asset categories or items, and includes the assignor’s signature and notarization if necessary. We review the assignment with the client to ensure clarity and compliance with California formalities. Once executed, the assignment should be kept with the trust documents and distributed to successor trustees and relevant institutions as needed.
The assignment is customized to reflect the trust’s title and date and to accurately describe the assets covered. We tailor the language to avoid ambiguity and to ensure the document is consistent with related estate planning instruments. Including clear descriptions and cross-references to the trust helps financial institutions and trustees understand the assignment’s purpose. Proper execution and notarization increase the document’s acceptance and usefulness as part of the funding record.
After execution, we advise clients on how to store the assignment with their trust documents and when to provide copies to successor trustees and financial institutions. In some cases we assist with direct communication to confirm acceptance or to begin retitling. Notifying institutions promptly helps prevent confusion if the trustmaker becomes incapacitated and ensures institutions know the trustmaker’s intentions. Where additional forms are required for retitling, we coordinate the process to streamline completion.
The final stage focuses on following up to complete retitling for high-priority assets and updating beneficiary designations where appropriate. We track progress with institutions, prepare deeds or account transfer documents, and confirm that each title change aligns with the trust’s terms. Completing these steps reduces the number of assets that remain dependent on a pour-over will and further minimizes probate exposure, ensuring the trust functions as intended for administration and distribution.
Where real property is part of the estate, we prepare and review deeds necessary to transfer title into the trust’s name, ensuring proper recording in the appropriate county. Real property transfers can involve mortgage considerations, tax questions, and co-ownership implications that require careful handling. We assist in coordinating with title companies and county recorders to confirm accurate recording and to address any title issues that could hinder trust administration or cause disputes among heirs.
We help clients update bank, brokerage, and retirement plan records as needed to reflect trust ownership or appropriate beneficiary designations. For retirement accounts where direct retitling is not possible, we review alternatives that align with the trustmaker’s objectives. Ensuring that account records correspond with the trust and will reduces confusion for successor trustees and beneficiaries and supports an orderly administration of the estate according to the trustmaker’s instructions.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a written declaration that certain assets should be treated as trust property. It is often used when a trust has been created but some assets remain titled in the individual’s name due to administrative delays or institutional requirements. The assignment documents the trustmaker’s intent and provides successor trustees and institutions with a clear indication that those assets are intended for trust administration. It can be especially useful for movable personal property and accounts that are cumbersome to retitle immediately. While a general assignment helps clarify intent, it may not replace formal retitling for all asset types. Certain assets like real estate or retirement accounts often require specific transfer procedures. The assignment is best used as part of a broader funding strategy that includes retitling high-priority assets when feasible and coordinating beneficiary designations and trust certifications to support smooth administration.
A general assignment can reduce the number of assets requiring probate by documenting the trustmaker’s intent to include certain property in the trust, but it does not automatically avoid probate for every type of asset. Assets with valid beneficiary designations or those already properly titled in the trust’s name typically bypass probate. The assignment helps for assets that are practical to treat as trust property, yet it may not substitute for required legal retitling when specific procedures apply. For complete probate avoidance, a comprehensive funding plan is often necessary. This plan includes retitling deeds, updating account ownership, and aligning beneficiary designations with the trust’s terms. Using the assignment alongside a pour-over will and trust certification can improve outcomes, but certain asset classes may still require probate or further legal processes.
A pour-over will is a testamentary instrument that directs any assets remaining in the individual’s name at death to the trust. The general assignment complements a pour-over will by documenting the trustmaker’s intent during their lifetime, reducing uncertainty about which assets should ultimately be administered under the trust. While the pour-over will transfers remaining assets into the trust after probate, the assignment may reduce the number of assets that actually need to go through probate by providing evidence of intent to treat them as trust property. Together, these documents form a safety net and a roadmap. The assignment provides interim clarity while the pour-over will ensures that any residual assets are ultimately captured by the trust even if formal retitling was not completed before death, helping to align final distributions with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Notarization of a general assignment is often recommended because it increases the document’s formality and acceptance by financial institutions and other parties. Recording the assignment in public records is less common and typically not necessary for personal property assignments, but deeds transferring real property into a trust should be recorded with the county recorder. Notarization provides a verifiable signature and can reduce challenges about the assignment’s authenticity during administration. Deciding whether to notarize or record depends on asset types and institutional preferences. We advise clients to notarize assignments and to consult about recording deeds for real property transfers. Proper storage and distribution of notarized originals to trustees and institutions help ensure seamless recognition when the assignment is needed.
Successor trustees can generally rely on a validly executed general assignment as evidence of the trustmaker’s intent to include certain assets in the trust. The assignment helps guide trustees when managing assets, paying debts, and distributing property according to the trust terms. However, trustees will often need additional documentation or cooperation from institutions to access accounts or transfer titles, so the assignment functions as part of a broader documentation package that includes trust certification and account records. To increase the assignment’s practical usefulness, trustees should be provided with originals or certified copies of the trust, the assignment, and any related powers of attorney or certifications. Clear instructions about the location of documents and contact information for institutions reduce delays and empower trustees to act efficiently on behalf of the trust and beneficiaries.
Certain asset types typically require formal retitling rather than relying solely on an assignment. Real property transfers generally require deed preparation and recording with the county recorder. Retirement accounts and IRAs often cannot be retitled into a trust without adverse tax or legal consequences and instead may require updated beneficiary designations to align with planning goals. Business interests and certain titled vehicles may also require specific transfer procedures to reflect trust ownership properly. Because these asset classes involve formal steps, a comprehensive funding plan identifies which assets need immediate retitling and which can be covered temporarily by an assignment. Coordinating with institutions and preparing necessary deeds or beneficiary forms helps ensure the trust’s terms govern those assets in the intended manner.
Financial institutions have varied practices regarding general assignments and retitling. To improve acceptance, provide a clear and notarized assignment that names the trust and trustmaker, and include a trust certification if the institution requests proof of the trust’s existence. Early communication with institutions to learn their documentation requirements and procedures for transferring accounts can prevent surprises. Preparing required forms in advance and offering to coordinate directly with the institution often expedites processing. When institutions require additional information, such as identification, tax documents, or account-specific authorization, fulfilling those requests promptly helps ensure the assignment serves its intended purpose. We work with clients to identify institutional requirements and facilitate direct communication to increase the likelihood of smooth acceptance and to plan subsequent retitling where necessary.
A general assignment is typically revocable while the trustmaker is alive and of sound mind, allowing the trustmaker to amend or revoke the assignment if circumstances change. Because a revocable living trust itself can be modified, the assignment may be updated to reflect changed asset lists or different funding plans. It is important to follow formal signing and notarization procedures for any amendments to ensure institutional acceptance and retain clarity for trustees and beneficiaries. When considering changes, document the revocation or amendment clearly and replace or distribute updated copies to trustees and any institutions that were given earlier versions. Keeping a dated record of changes prevents confusion and ensures that successor trustees can follow the trustmaker’s most current instructions regarding asset ownership and administration.
Store original trust documents and any general assignment in a secure yet accessible location, and provide copies to successor trustees and close family members as appropriate. Inform designated trustees of the documents’ location and consider keeping originals with a trust attorney or a secure safe deposit arrangement while ensuring designated individuals can access them when necessary. Maintaining a clear inventory of where documents are kept reduces delays when they are needed for administration or institutional requirements. Sharing copies with financial institutions in advance, when appropriate, can also help facilitate future transactions. However, exercise caution and limit distribution to trusted individuals to preserve confidentiality. Labeling and organizing documents with a clear checklist makes it easier for trustees and family members to find the paperwork needed to implement the trustmaker’s objectives.
After executing a general assignment, the next steps include storing the original with the trust documents, notifying successor trustees of its existence and location, and providing copies to institutions where appropriate. Begin a plan to retitle high-priority assets and update beneficiary designations to reduce reliance on the assignment over time. Ongoing follow-up with banks, brokers, and title companies will move the process toward complete funding of the trust for greater certainty and reduced probate exposure. Clients should also review related documents like powers of attorney and health care directives to ensure coordination with the assignment and trust. Periodic reviews of the funding plan and asset inventory will keep the estate plan current and aligned with changing circumstances, ensuring that the trust functions as intended for the benefit of the trustmaker and beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas